[Clinical efficacy of local injection of platelet-rich plasma combined with double-layer artificial dermis in treating wounds with exposed tendon on extremity].

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of local injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with double-layer artificial dermis in treating wounds with exposed tendon on extremity. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted. From December 2017 to October 2022, 16 patients were admitted to Department of Orthopaedic Trauma of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, and 32 patients were admitted to Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery of Guiyang Steel Factory Staff Hospital. All the patients had wounds with exposed tendon on extremity caused by various reasons and met the inclusion criteria. There were 39 males and 9 females, aged 26 to 58 years. The patients were divided into PRP alone group, artificial dermis alone group, and PRP+artificial dermis group, with 16 patients in each group. The wounds were treated with autologous PRP, double-layer artificial dermis, or thei combination of autologous PRP and double-layer artificial dermis, followed by autologous split-thickness scalp grafting after good growth of granulation tissue. On the 7th day after the secondary surgery, the autograft survival was observed, and the survival rate was calculated. The wound healing time and length of hospital stay of patients were recorded. At 3 and 6 months after wound healing, the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) was used to score the pigmentation, height, vascularity, and pliability of scars, and the total score was calculated. Adverse reactions during the entire treatment process were recorded. Data were statistically analyzed with chi-square test, Fisher's exact probability test, one-way analysis of variance, least significant difference test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Nemenyi test, and Bonferroni correction. Results: On the 7th day after the secondary surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in the autograft survival rate of patients among PRP alone group, artificial dermis alone group, and PRP+artificial dermis group (P>0.05). The wound healing time and length of hospital stay of patients in PRP+artificial dermis group were (20.1±3.0) and (24±4) d, respectively, which were significantly shorter than (24.4±5.5) and (30±8) d in PRP alone group (P<0.05) and (24.8±4.9) and (32±8) d in artificial dermis alone group (P<0.05). At 3 and 6 months after wound healing, the pliability scores of patients in PRP+artificial dermis group were significantly lower than those in PRP alone group (with Z values of 12.91 and 15.69, respectively, P<0.05) and artificial dermis alone group (with Z values of 12.50 and 12.91, respectively, P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in pigmentation, vascularity, height scores, and total score of scar of patients among the three groups (P>0.05). In artificial dermis alone group, one patient experienced partial liquefaction and detachment of the double-layer artificial dermis due to local infection of Staphylococcus epidermidis, which received wound dressing change, second artificial dermis transplantation, and subsequent treatment as before. No adverse reactions occurred in the remaining patients during the whole treatment process. Conclusions: Local injection of PRP combined with double-layer artificial dermis is effective in treating wounds with exposed tendon on extremity, which can not only significantly shorten wound healing time and length of hospital stay, but also improve scar pliability after wound healing to some extent in the long term. It is a clinically valuable treatment technique that is worth promoting and applying.

Time to start putting down the knife: A systematic review of burns excision tools of randomised and non-randomised trials.

AIMS: Dermal preservation during acute burn excision is key to obtaining superior healing/scar outcomes, however, determining the most appropriate excision tool is an ongoing challenge. Novel tool development means the knife is no longer our only option, yet for the majority it remains the gold standard. This systematic review aims to evaluate evidence for burns excision approaches (knife/hydrosurgery/enzymatic). METHODS: CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE (1946-2017) were searched with MeSH terms: 'debridement', 'burns', 'sharp', 'enzymatic', 'hydrosurgery'. Relevant randomised control trials (RCTs)/non-randomised controlled case series/trials were extracted/analysed. In vitro/burn non-specific studies were excluded. Main methodological parameters were intervention/excision efficacy. RESULTS: Eighteen articles met inclusion criteria (n=7148): three were RCTs, involving comparator enzymatic (NexoBrid™ (EDNX)) or hydrosurgical (Versajet™) excision to surgical Standard of Care. Both showed statistically significant decreased need for excisional excision and auto-grafting by viable tissue preservation allowing spontaneous healing by epithelialisation. CONCLUSION: Level 1 Evidence comparing excision modalities for acute burns is sparse. Although early excision with a knife is still often considered best practice, there is no tool choice consensus or robust comparison with alternate, possibly superior, tools. EDNX or Versajet™ should be considered alternatively. Further RCTs are indicated, with regards final scar outcomes and to allow consensus within current evidence.

Eschar removal by bromelain based enzymatic debridement (Nexobrid®) in burns: An European consensus.

Early debridement and/or eschar removal is regarded as a significant step in the treatment of deep partial and full thickness burns. It aims to control wound bioburden and allows early wound closure by conservative treatment or skin grafting. Preservation of viable dermis accompanied by early wound closure, is regarded as a necessary step to reduce scar related complication, e.g. functional limitations and/or unaesthetic scar formation. Aside from the classical techniques of surgical excision as tangential excision for eschar removal, hydro-surgery, maggot therapy, laser, enzymatic debridement have been described as additional techniques in the burn surgeon's armamentarium. It is widely accepted that early eschar removal within 72h improves the outcome of burn wound treatment by reducing bacterial wound colonization, infection and length of hospital stay. In contrast, the right technique for eschar removal is still a matter of debate. There is increasing evidence that enzymatic debridement is a powerful tool to remove eschar in burn wounds, reducing blood loss, the need for autologous skin grafting and the number of wounds requiring surgical excision. In order to assess the role and clinical advantages of enzymatic debridement by a mixture of proteolytic enzymes enriched in Bromelain (Nexobrid®) beyond the scope of the literature and in view of users' experience, a European Consensus Meeting was scheduled. The aim was to provide statements for application, based on the mutual experience of applying enzymatic debridement in more than 500 adult and pediatric patients by the consensus panelists. Issues to be addressed were: indications, pain management and anesthesia, timing of application, technique of application, after-intervention care, skin grafting after enzymatic debridement, blood loss, training strategies and learning curve and areas of future research needs. Sixty-eight (68) consensus statements were provided for the use of enzymatic debridement. The degree of consensus was remarkably high, with a unanimous consensus in 88.2% of statements, and lowest degree of consensus of 70% in only 3 statements. This consensus document may serve as preliminary guideline for the use of enzymatic debridement with user-oriented recommendations until further evidence and systematic guidelines are available.

[Effectiveness of scar split thickness skin graft combined with acellular allogeneic dermis in treatment of large deep II degree burn scar].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of using scar split thickness skin grafts combined with acellular allogeneic dermis in the treatment of large deep II degree burn scar. METHODS: Between January 2013 and December 2013, 20 cases of large deep II degree burn scar undergoing plastic operation were enrolled. There were 14 males and 6 females, aged 4 to 60 years (mean, 40 years). Burn reasons included hydrothermal burns in 10 cases, flame burns in 9 cases, and lime burns in 1 case. The burn area accounted for 70% to 96% total body surface area (TBSA) with an average of 79% TBSA. The time from wound healing to scar repair was 3 months to 2 years (mean, 7 months). Based on self-control, 0.7 mm scar split thickness skin graft was used to repair the wound at the right side of joints after scar resection (control group, n=35), 0.5 mm scar split thickness skin graft combined with acellular allogeneic dermis at the left side of joints (trial group, n=30). Difference was not statistically significant in the scar sites between 2 groups (Z=-1.152, P=0.249). After grafting, negative pressure drainage was given for 10 days; plaster was used for immobilization till wound healing; and all patients underwent regular rehabilitation exercises. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in wound healing, infection, and healing time between 2 groups (P > 0.05). All patients were followed up for 6 months. According to the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), the score was 5.23 ± 1.41 in trial group and was 10.17 ± 2.26 in control group, showing significant difference (t=8.925, P=0.000). Referring to Activities of Daily Living (ADL) grading standards to assess joint function, the results were excellent in 8 cases, good in 20 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case in trial group; the results were excellent in 3 cases, good in 5 cases, fair in 22 cases, and poor in 5 cases in control group; and difference was statistically significant (Z=-4.894, P=0.000). CONCLUSION: A combination of scar split thickness skin graft and acellular allogeneic dermis in the treatment of large deep II degree burn scar is feasible and can become one of solution to the problem of skin source tension.

Combined anti-calcification treatment of bovine pericardium with amino compounds and solvents.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of treatment with amino compounds and solvents in vivo on calcifications of glutaraldehyde (GA)-fixed pericardium. Groups of bovine pericardium samples were fixed with 0.5% GA. We used urazole and glutamate to neutralize the free aldehyde and some solvents (ethanol with octanol or octanediol) to reduce the phospholipid content in the bovine pericardial tissue. Tensile strength and thermal stability were evaluated before implantation. Twelve weeks after rat subdermal implantation, the pericardial samples were harvested from eight juvenile rats. Urazole [calcium (Ca(2+)): 11.86 ± 2.85 µg/mg; inorganic phosphorus (IP): 32.59 ± 7.73 µg/mg] or glutamate (Ca(2+): 7.95 ± 1.21 µg/mg; IP: 21.76 ± 3.48 µg/mg) alone significantly decreased the Ca(2+) and IP concentrations (without any anti-calcification treatment, Ca(2+): 277.85 ± 17.51 µg/mg; IP: 147.07 ± 8.32 µg/mg), but when used with organic solvents, the Ca(2+) and IP concentrations were the lowest (Ca(2+): 0.05 ± 0.04 µg/mg; IP: 3.36 ± 0.61 µg/mg). After anti-calcification treatment, the calcifications in microscopic images were dramatically decreased. Anti-calcification treatment with glutamate, urazole, and solvents did not worsen the physical properties of bovine pericardium, and significantly prevented in vivo calcifications compared to GA fixation only. There should be additional studies done to understand the other mechanism underlying xenograft tissue calcification.

Acroqueratodermia siríngea acuagénica. Presentación de dos casos / Aquagenic syringeal acrokeratoderma. Presentation of two cases

La acroqueratodermia siríngea acuagénica es una queratodermia adquirida y transitoria que se exacerba tras sumergir en agua las palmas y/o las plantas. Se manifiesta como pápulas y placas blanquecinas o amarillentas, translúcidas y aplanadas localizadas en las zonas de presión o traumatismo de palmas y/o plantas. La afectación suele ser bilateral. La histología es inespecífica, mostrando una ligera dilatación de la porción intraepidérmica del conducto excretor ecrino. El proceso tiende a la remisión espontánea. Presentamos el caso de 2 mujeres de 20 y 21 años que presentaban un cuadro de acroqueratodermia siríngea acuagénica de largo tiempo de evolución

Aquagenic syringeal acrokeratoderma is an infrequently described acquired, transitory keratoderma that is exacerbated when the palms and/or soles are immersed in water. It manifests as whitish or yellowish flattened, translucent papules and plaques, located in areas of pressure or trauma on the palms and/or soles. Involvement is usually bilateral. The histologic features are non-specific, showing a slight dilation of the intraepidermal portion of the eccrine sweat duct. The process tends to remit spontaneously. We present the case of two women, aged 20 and 21

"Cook Weekend Alternative to the Facelift". Liposculpture of the face, neck, and jowls with laser dermal resurfacing and platysmal plication.

The "Cook Weekend Alternative to the Facelift" is a combined liposculpture and laser surgical procedure which produces excellent cosmetic results, in many cases comparable to the results of traditional surgical rhytidectomy, without the extensive surgical intervention and prolonged recovery time needed for rhytidectomy. The procedure consists of liposculpture of the face, neck, and jowls; laser resurfacing of the platysma and underside of the dermis; vaporization of subcutaneous fat; resection of a small ellipse of excess submental skin; separation of the neck septa; and plication of the platysma, with or without chin augmentation. Cosmetic results can be dramatic, and most patients return to normal activities approximately three days postoperatively.