RESUMEN
Allergies have been known to be an abnormally vigorous immune response in which the immune system fights off an allergen or antigen, initiating mast cells to release histamine into the blood. Substances that prevent mast cells from releasing histamine are considered antiallergic agents. The drugs utilized to treat allergy are mast cell stabilizers, steroids, anti-histamine, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and decongestants. Anti-histamine drugs have side effects such as drowsiness, confusion, constipation, difficulty urinating, blurred vision, etc. The use of medicinal plants for the effective and safe management of diseases has recently received much attention. Various herbs are utilized for their antiallergic and anti-histaminic properties. Some of the herbs useful in the management of allergic diseases of the respiratory tract, like Piper longum, Ocimum tenuiflorum, Solanum xanthocarpum have been discussed. Ample scientific evidence is available for the anti-histaminic and antiallergic activity of Azadirachta indica, Aloe vera, Tinospora cordifolia, and many other such herbs are safer to use as antiallergic agents have been reported. The review summarizes a wide variety of herbs and botanical ingredients with their common scientific names and distribution for easy identification and usage as safe antiallergic agents and discusses their molecular mechanisms involved in combating allergic reactions.
Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos , Hipersensibilidad , Humanos , Antialérgicos/farmacología , Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Estabilizadores de Mastocitos , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/uso terapéutico , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios/farmacología , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Hipersensibilidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Histamina/uso terapéutico , AlérgenosRESUMEN
Middle ear barotrauma (MEB) is a common complication of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy. It has been reported in more than 40% of HBO2 treatments and can interrupt the sequence of HBO2. MEB may lead to pain, tympanic membrane rupture, and even hearing loss. The aim of this study was to determine if pretreatment with intranasal fluticasone and oxymetazoline affected the incidence of MEB. We conducted a retrospective chart review of subjects undergoing HBO2 at our institution between February 1, 2014, and May 31, 2019. Subjects in the fluticasone/oxymetazoline (FOT) treatment group used intranasal fluticasone 50 mcg two times per day and oxymetazoline 0.05% one spray two times per day beginning 48 hours prior to initial HBO2. Oxymetazoline was discontinued after four days. Fluticasone was continued for the duration of HBO2 therapy. A total of 154 unique subjects underwent 5,683 HBO2 treatments: 39 unique subjects in the FOT group underwent 1,501 HBO2; 115 unique subjects in the nFOT (no oxymetazoline or fluticasone treatment) group underwent 4,182 HBO2 treatments. The incidence of MEB was 15.4% in the FOT group and 16.2% in the nFOT group. This was not a statistically significant difference (OR = 0.77; p = 0.636). Treatment pressure, age over 65 years, male sex, and BMI were not associated with a difference in MEB incidence. In summary, pretreatment with intranasal oxymetazoline and fluticasone in patients undergoing HBO2 did not significantly reduce MEB. More investigation with larger numbers of participants and prospective studies could further clarify this issue.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Barotrauma/prevención & control , Oído Medio/lesiones , Fluticasona/uso terapéutico , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Oximetazolina/uso terapéutico , Administración Intranasal , Anciano , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Barotrauma/epidemiología , Barotrauma/etiología , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Fluticasona/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Descongestionantes Nasales/administración & dosificación , Rociadores Nasales , Oximetazolina/administración & dosificación , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Acute upper respiratory tract infections are extremely common in adults and children, but only a few safe and effective treatments are available. Patients typically present with nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, sore throat, cough, general malaise, and/or low-grade fever. Informing patients about the self-limited nature of the common cold can help manage expectations, limit antibiotic use, and avoid over-the-counter purchases that may not help. Treatments with proven effectiveness for cold symptoms in adults include over-the-counter analgesics, zinc, nasal decongestants with or without antihistamines, and ipratropium for cough. Lower-quality evidence suggests that Lactobacillus casei may be beneficial in older adults. The only established safe and effective treatments for children are acetylcysteine, honey (for children one year and older), nasal saline irrigation, intranasal ipratropium, and topical application of ointment containing camphor, menthol, and eucalyptus oils. Over-the-counter cold medications should not be used in children younger than four years. Counseling patients about the importance of good hand hygiene is the best way to prevent transmission of cold viruses.
Asunto(s)
Resfriado Común/terapia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Adulto , Ácido Ascórbico/uso terapéutico , Niño , Echinacea , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Humanos , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature continues to grow. Critical evaluation and understanding of this literature is important to appropriately utilize this knowledge in the care of AR patients. The International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR) has been produced as a multidisciplinary international effort. This Executive Summary highlights and summarizes the findings of the comprehensive ICAR:AR document. METHODS: The ICAR:AR document was produced using previously described methodology. Specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. RESULTS: Over 100 individual topics related to AR diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR were addressed in the comprehensive ICAR:AR document. Herein, the Executive Summary provides a synopsis of these findings. CONCLUSION: In the ICAR:AR critical review of the literature, several strengths were identified. In addition, significant knowledge gaps exist in the AR literature where current practice is not based on the best quality evidence; these should be seen as opportunities for additional research. The ICAR:AR document evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature. This Executive Summary condenses these findings into a short summary. The reader is also encouraged to consult the comprehensive ICAR:AR document for a thorough description of this work.
Asunto(s)
Rinitis Alérgica/diagnóstico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Alérgenos/análisis , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Terapias Complementarias/métodos , Costo de Enfermedad , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Combinación de Medicamentos , Costos de los Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Endoscopía/métodos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/prevención & control , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Anamnesis/métodos , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Examen Físico/métodos , Preparaciones de Plantas/uso terapéutico , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/uso terapéutico , Rinitis Alérgica/etiología , Rinitis Alérgica/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Solución Salina/uso terapéutico , Pruebas Cutáneas , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR). METHODS: Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. RESULTS: The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR. CONCLUSION: This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding.
Asunto(s)
Rinitis Alérgica/diagnóstico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Alérgenos/análisis , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Terapias Complementarias/métodos , Citocinas/fisiología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Quimioterapia Combinada , Endoscopía/métodos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/fisiología , Microbiota , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Examen Físico/métodos , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Mucosa Respiratoria/fisiología , Rinitis Alérgica/etiología , Rinitis Alérgica/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Solución Salina/uso terapéutico , Pruebas Cutáneas/métodos , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
To observe and analyze the effect of compound shuanghua tablets combined with western medicine on serum and secretion inflammatory factors in patients with acute secretory otitis media caused by swimming. The 140 patients who had been treated in our hospital for acute secretory otitis media were selected as research objects, all of which were caused by swimming. The patients were divided into two groups, namely the control group accepting routine western drug therapy and the research group accepting compound shuanghua tablets combined with western drug therapy, each group contains 70 patients. The therapeutic effect of patients in two groups were observed and compared. Through observation, the levels of tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 were found to be significantly improved in the research group compared with the control group, and the intergroup difference was of statistical significance, p<0.05; The overall treatment efficiency of the research group was significantly higher than that of the control group, with statistical significance, p<0.05. For patients with acute secretory otitis media caused by swimming, the compound shuanghua tablets combined with Western medicine treatment can not only actively reduce various inflammatory factors in middle ear effusion, but also significantly improve the overall treatment efficiency.
Asunto(s)
Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/uso terapéutico , Mediadores de Inflamación/sangre , Otitis Media con Derrame/tratamiento farmacológico , Otitis Media con Derrame/metabolismo , Natación , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/farmacología , Exudados y Transudados/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Interleucina-10/sangre , Interleucina-10/metabolismo , Interleucina-6/sangre , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Masculino , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Otitis Media con Derrame/sangre , Oximetazolina/uso terapéutico , Comprimidos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/sangre , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/metabolismo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study examined the association between mean age of pilot, pilot license, pilot medical certificate and drug use trends in pilots fatally injured in aircraft accidents. The prevalence of prescription drugs, OTC drugs, controlled drugs and drugs that may be potentially impairing was also examined. METHODS: This study was a descriptive observational study in which the NTSB Aviation Accident Database was searched from the period beginning January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014. RESULTS: During the study period a total of 706 accidents involving 711 fatalities were investigated by the NTSB. This study included 633 of these accidents, involving 646 fatalities. Of these pilots, 42.1% had drugs in their biological samples. The prevalence of prescription drugs, controlled drugs, OTC drugs, opioids, and potentially impairing drugs in the fatally injured pilot population over the study period was 28.9%, 15.0%, 20.1%, 5.1%, and 25.5%, respectively. Pilots with any drugs in their samples were significantly older than those without drugs. Medical certificate held was associated with drug use; pilots who held third class certificates had the highest prevalence at 54.1%. Pilot license was not associated with drug use. In 3.8% of the accidents, drugs were a contributing factor in the cause. DISCUSSION: Despite current FAA medical regulations, potentially impairing drugs are frequently found in biological samples of fatally injured pilots in the U.S. More education of airmen by aviation medical examiners is needed on the safety of drug use.Akparibo IY, Stolfi A. Pilot certification, age of pilot, and drug use in fatal civil aviation accidents. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017; 88(10):931-936.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Aviación/mortalidad , Certificación , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Pilotos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Accidentes de Aviación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trastornos Relacionados con Anfetaminas/epidemiología , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Antiulcerosos/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Relacionados con Cocaína/epidemiología , Femenino , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Abuso de Marihuana/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Prevalencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Respiratory tract infections in young children are the most common cause of general practice visits in Australia. Despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines, the treatment and management of respiratory tract infections in young children is inconsistent. The aim of the study was to explore the management of respiratory tract infections in young children from a multi-disciplinary perspective using across-sectional qualitative research design based on the theoretical domains framework and the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation-B model. In-depth interviews were conducted with 30 primary care providers to explore their knowledge, views and management of respiratory tract infections in young children. Interviews focused on symptomatic management, over-the-counter medications and antibiotic use, and data were thematically analysed. Our findings showed that factors such as primary care providers' time constraints, parental anxiety, general practitioners' perception of what parents want, perceived parental pressure, and fear of losing patients were some of the reasons why primary care providers did not always adhere to guideline recommendations. Primary care providers also provided conflicting advice to parents concerning over-the-counter medications and when children should resume normal activities. Overall, this study showed that complex interactions involving emotional and psychological factors influenced the decision making process of primary care providers' management of respiratory tract infections in young children. A team care approach with consistent advice, and improved communication between primary care providers and parents is vital to overcome some of these barriers and improve guideline adherence. The findings of this research will inform the development of interventions to better manage respiratory tract infections in young children. RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONS: CLINICIANS SWAYED BY PARENTAL ANXIETY AND PRESSURE: The emotions and psychology of both parents and clinicians influence how respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are managed in young children. Researchers in Australia, led by Ruby Biezen from Monash University, interviewed 30 primary care clinicians about their views on how to care for children with RTIs, such as the common cold. The interviews focused on symptomatic management, over-the-counter medications and antibiotic use. Despite the availability of best-practice guidelines, clinicians did not always follow the recommendations owing to factors such as time constraints, parental anxiety, perceived parental pressure, and fear of losing patients. These are some of the reasons why clinicians sometimes advise or prescribe unnecessary medications. The authors suggest that a team approach involving multiple healthcare professionals who deliver consistent advice could improve guideline adherence.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Fluidoterapia , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Pediatría , Atención Primaria de Salud , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/terapia , Antitusígenos/uso terapéutico , Australia , Preescolar , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Médicos Generales , Humanos , Lactante , Enfermería Maternoinfantil , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Comodidad del Paciente , Farmacéuticos , Extractos Vegetales/uso terapéutico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Investigación Cualitativa , DescansoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The review presents some information on known options for treatment of nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) with introduction to new therapies. The merits and limitations of recent advancements in pharmacotherapy of this common problem are briefly discussed as well. RECENT FINDINGS: Intranasal corticosteroids are first-line therapy for NAR. Fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone remain the only topical corticosteroids approved for NAR. The use of azelastine - another first-line option - has also been found to be effective even though NAR is a nonallergic entity by definition. Combination of fluticasone propionate and azelastine is a promising option in achieving better symptom reduction. Coadministration of intranasal corticosteroid and topical decongestants is an attractive topic that requires additional safety studies before recommending treatment. Although promising, no scientifically valid recommendation can be made for treatment of NAR with capsaicin. Surgical options in patients with refractory NAR are limited. New studies demonstrate a lack of correlation between objective outcome of radiofrequency ablation of the inferior turbinate and subjective patient symptoms. SUMMARY: The heterogeneity in clinical presentation makes NAR treatment a daily challenge for otolaryngologists. The diversity of clinical studies with use of unique outcome measures limit systematic reviews which may be instrumental in providing strong recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Rinitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intranasal , Beclometasona/uso terapéutico , Capsaicina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Fluticasona/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Rinitis/cirugía , Fármacos del Sistema Sensorial/uso terapéuticoAsunto(s)
Lactancia Materna/métodos , Trastornos de la Lactancia/diagnóstico , Adulto , Extracción de Leche Materna , Cabergolina , Ergolinas/uso terapéutico , Estrógenos/uso terapéutico , Conducta Alimentaria , Femenino , Homeopatía/métodos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Trastornos de la Lactancia/etiología , Trastornos de la Lactancia/terapia , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Embarazo , Prolactina/uso terapéutico , Seudoefedrina/uso terapéutico , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Allergic rhinitis (AR) results from a complex allergen-driven mucosal inflammation in the nasal cavity. Current guideline-based therapy for allergic rhinitis include oral and nasal antihistamines, topical and systemic glucocorticoids, decongestants, antimuscarinic agents, mast cell stabilizing drugs, leukotriene-receptor antagonists, and others. In spite of guideline recommendations, most patients are using multiple therapies in an attempt to achieve symptom control. Therefore, more effective therapies for the management of AR are clearly required. Recently, a novel fixed dose combination containing azelastine and fluticasone propionate has successfully been introduced. At present, it represents the only meaningful topical drug combination. Perhaps, it will be followed by others.
Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intranasal , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Antagonistas de Leucotrieno/uso terapéutico , Descongestionantes Nasales/administración & dosificación , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Preparaciones de Plantas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Fluticasone propionate and nasal saline irrigation have been used in the treatment of sinonasal diseases for a long time. Our study investigates the effect of the combination of large volume low pressure nasal saline irrigation and fluticasone propionate for the treatment of pediatric acute rhinosinusitis. METHODS: Ninety-one pediatric patients with acute rhinosinusitis were included in our study. The patients were randomized into two groups. The first group (n=45) was treated with standard therapy (antibiotherapy+nasal decongestant) for 2 weeks, the second group was treated with the large volume low pressure nasal saline+fluticasone propionate combination for 3 weeks. The clinical scores, radiologic evaluations (X-ray Waters view), peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) measurements, total symptom scores and hematologic parameters (WBC, CRP, ESR) of the patients were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in between the two groups regarding age, gender, height and weight. Even though the clinical scores of Group 2 improved more rapidly, there were no significant differences in between groups regarding clinical scores by the 21st day. There were no significant differences in post treatment radiologic evaluations (Waters graphy). Both groups had significant improvement of their post treatment PNIF values, yet the improvement was more marked in Group 2 than in Group 1. The rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, throat itching and cough symptoms improved more rapidly in Group 2 than in Group 1. Post-treatment nose itching and sneezing symptoms were significantly less in Group 2. The values of hematologic parameters were significantly reduced at the end of the 3rd week in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is a first in investigating the combined use of large volume low pressure nasal saline and fluticasone propionate in acute pediatric rhinosinusitis, and the results reveal that the combination therapy was effective. Low pressure large volume nasal saline+fluticasone propionate combination can be employed as a new line of therapy for the treatment of pediatric acute rhinosinusitis, either by itself or combined with standard therapy.
Asunto(s)
Androstadienos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Lavado Nasal (Proceso) , Rinitis/terapia , Sinusitis/terapia , Cloruro de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Combinación Amoxicilina-Clavulanato de Potasio/uso terapéutico , Sedimentación Sanguínea , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Niño , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Fluticasona , Humanos , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Inhalación , Masculino , Seno Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Rhinitis is normally defined by the symptoms of nasal congestion, postnasal drainage, rhinorrhea, and sneezing. It has been associated with various pathologic changes, but can occur in the absence of any inflammation. Thus, the diagnosis is based on the clinical presentation. There are no clear-cut criteria to distinguish when rhinitis becomes chronic, but in its chronic form, it can be complex. Chronic forms of rhinitis that occur in the absence of any detectable specific IgE against relevant aeroallergens in its broadest sense can be called chronic nonallergic rhinitis. This review will concentrate on chronic nonallergic rhinitis in its various forms, discussing the epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and its therapy.
Asunto(s)
Rinitis/inmunología , Terapia por Acupuntura , Enfermedad Crónica , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Rinitis/terapia , Cloruro de Sodio/uso terapéuticoAsunto(s)
Resfriado Común/prevención & control , Suplementos Dietéticos , Terapia por Ejercicio , Desinfección de las Manos , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Antitusígenos/uso terapéutico , Ácido Ascórbico/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/uso terapéutico , Resfriado Común/terapia , Combinación de Medicamentos , Echinacea , Ajo , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Miel , Humanos , Ipratropio/uso terapéutico , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Panax , Extractos Vegetales/uso terapéutico , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Terpenos/uso terapéutico , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Zinc/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
This article intends to place new treatments in the context of allergic rhinitis (AR) treatment history. The medical literature was searched for significant advances and changes in AR treatment. Historical data on AR treatment options and management were selected. Reviews of AR management published throughout the 20th century were included to provide context for treatment advances. Modern AR treatment began in the early 20th century with immunotherapy and was soon followed by the emergence of antihistamine therapy in the 1930s. Numerous treatments for AR have been used over the ensuing decades, including decongestants, mast cell stabilizers, and leukotriene receptor antagonists. Topical corticosteroid options were developed the 1950s, and, added to baseline antihistamine therapy, became the foundation of AR treatment. Treatment options were significantly impacted after the 1987 Montreal Protocol, which phased out the use of chlorofluorocarbon propellant aerosols because of environmental concerns. From the mid-1990s until recently, this left only aqueous solution options for intranasal corticosteroids (INSs). The approval of the first hydrofluoroalkane propellant aerosol INSs for AR in 2012 restored a "dry" aerosol treatment option. The first combination intranasal antihistamine/INSs was also approved in 2012, providing a novel treatment option for AR. Treatment of AR has progressed with new therapeutic options now available. This should continue to move forward with agents to alter the allergic mechanism itself and impact the disease burden that has a significant impact on patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos/historia , Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia , Rinitis Alérgica/terapia , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/historia , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Antialérgicos/administración & dosificación , Terapias Complementarias/historia , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/historia , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia/historia , Descongestionantes Nasales/administración & dosificación , Descongestionantes Nasales/historia , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Rinitis Alérgica/historiaRESUMEN
The algorithm and recommendations provided here can help you take an evidence-based approach to your patient's allergic rhinitis.
Asunto(s)
Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne , Pruebas Cutáneas/métodos , Administración Intranasal , Adulto , Algoritmos , Niño , Terapias Complementarias , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/diagnóstico , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/fisiopatología , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/terapiaRESUMEN
The common cold, or upper respiratory tract infection, is one of the leading reasons for physician visits. Generally caused by viruses, the common cold is treated symptomatically. Antibiotics are not effective in children or adults. In children, there is a potential for harm and no benefits with over-the-counter cough and cold medications; therefore, they should not be used in children younger than four years. Other commonly used medications, such as inhaled corticosteroids, oral prednisolone, and Echinacea, also are ineffective in children. Products that improve symptoms in children include vapor rub, zinc sulfate, Pelargonium sidoides (geranium) extract, and buckwheat honey. Prophylactic probiotics, zinc sulfate, nasal saline irrigation, and the herbal preparation Chizukit reduce the incidence of colds in children. For adults, antihistamines, intranasal corticosteroids, codeine, nasal saline irrigation, Echinacea angustifolia preparations, and steam inhalation are ineffective at relieving cold symptoms. Pseudoephedrine, phenylephrine, inhaled ipratropium, and zinc (acetate or gluconate) modestly reduce the severity and duration of symptoms for adults. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and some herbal preparations, including Echinacea purpurea, improve symptoms in adults. Prophylactic use of garlic may decrease the frequency of colds in adults, but has no effect on duration of symptoms. Hand hygiene reduces the spread of viruses that cause cold illnesses. Prophylactic vitamin C modestly reduces cold symptom duration in adults and children.
Asunto(s)
Resfriado Común/terapia , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Antitusígenos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/uso terapéutico , Terapias Complementarias , Expectorantes/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Descongestionantes Nasales/uso terapéutico , Lavado Nasal (Proceso) , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The eye has become the target of intense pharmacologic development because it represents one of the most active sites of allergic inflammation, due to it having no mechanical barrier to prevent the impact of allergens such as pollen on its surface. Over the past 20 years, we have witnessed an astonishing growth in therapeutic advances, ranging essentially from derivatives of simple aspirin to various newly developed biological immunomodulatory agents, using implantable drug delivery devices that exceed the safety and efficacy of those available for other organ systems and resorting to advanced surgical techniques for the correction of sight-threatening, disease-related complications. Overall, with the expanding knowledge base, the intricacy of ocular inflammation appears to be becoming ever more manageable and the clinical allergist/immunologist has an increasing role in the treatment outcomes of patients with anterior inflammatory disorders of the ocular surface primarily allergic conjunctivitis but also including dry eye syndromes.