Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
3.
Circulation ; 142(16_suppl_1): S41-S91, 2020 10 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33084391

RESUMEN

This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations on basic life support summarizes evidence evaluations performed for 22 topics that were prioritized by the Basic Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. The evidence reviews include 16 systematic reviews, 5 scoping reviews, and 1 evidence update. Per agreement within the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, new or revised treatment recommendations were only made after a systematic review. Systematic reviews were performed for the following topics: dispatch diagnosis of cardiac arrest, use of a firm surface for CPR, sequence for starting CPR (compressions-airway-breaths versus airway-breaths-compressions), CPR before calling for help, duration of CPR cycles, hand position during compressions, rhythm check timing, feedback for CPR quality, alternative techniques, public access automated external defibrillator programs, analysis of rhythm during chest compressions, CPR before defibrillation, removal of foreign-body airway obstruction, resuscitation care for suspected opioid-associated emergencies, drowning, and harm from CPR to victims not in cardiac arrest. The topics that resulted in the most extensive task force discussions included CPR during transport, CPR before calling for help, resuscitation care for suspected opioid-associated emergencies, feedback for CPR quality, and analysis of rhythm during chest compressions. After discussion of the scoping reviews and the evidence update, the task force prioritized several topics for new systematic reviews.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/normas , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida/normas , Adulto , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Desfibriladores , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia
4.
Eur J Gen Pract ; 26(1): 33-41, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31686571

RESUMEN

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major cause of premature mortality. Survival is possible when timely cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation are available in the community. GPs are well placed to provide early OHCA care and significantly increased rates of survival are achieved when GPs participate in resuscitation. A novel project alerts volunteer GP first responders to nearby OHCAs in Ireland.Objectives: To explore the reasons why GPs volunteer to be OHCA first responders and their experience of participation.Methods: A qualitative study involving in-depth, semi-structured interviews followed by thematic analysis was undertaken in 2017/18. Fourteen GPs from differing geographical areas in Ireland, who volunteered as OHCA first-responders were recruited to participate by purposive methods.Results: GP participation in OHCA voluntary first response was understood as a function of GPs relationship to the community, their ability to manage competing demands in their personal and professional lives and also specific participatory gains. GPs expressed both altruistic motivations and a sense of obligation. GPs described a complex, multifaceted role in providing OHCA first response; they derived an inherent sense of satisfaction in delivering potentially life-saving interventions but also in the provision of holistic, compassionate end-of-life care for patients and their families. Participation was not without psychosocial risk for GPs.Conclusion: GPs volunteer to provide early OHCA emergency care because of their relationship to the community. Care provided is complex and includes both resuscitation and end-of-life care.


Asunto(s)
Socorristas , Médicos Generales , Motivación , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Voluntarios , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Desfibriladores , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Sistemas de Comunicación entre Servicios de Urgencia , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Humanos , Irlanda , Masculino , Investigación Cualitativa , Envío de Mensajes de Texto
5.
BMJ Open ; 9(1): e022776, 2019 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30782685

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is the combination of acute heart failure syndrome (AHF) and renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≤60 mL/min). Real-life data were used to compare the management and outcome of AHF with and without renal dysfunction. DESIGN: Prospective, multicentre. SETTING: Twenty-six academic, community and regional hospitals in France. PARTICIPANTS: 507 patients with AHF were assessed in two groups according to renal function: group 1 (patients with CRS (CrCl ≤60 mL/min): n=335) and group 2 (patients with AHF with normal renal function (CrCl >60 mL/min): n=172). RESULTS: Differences were observed (group 1 vs group 2) at admission for the incidence of chronic heart failure (56.42% vs 47.67%), use of furosemide (60.9% vs 52.91%), insulin (15.52% vs 9.3%) and amiodarone (14.33% vs 4.65%); additionally, more patients in group 1 carried a defibrillator (4.78% vs 0%), had ≥2 hospitalisations in the last year (15.52% vs 5.81%) and were under the care of a cardiologist (72.24% vs 61.63%). Clinical signs were broadly similar in each group. Brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and BNP prohormone were higher in group 1 than group 2 (1157.5 vs 534 ng/L and 5120 vs 2513 ng/mL), and more patients in group 1 were positive for troponin (58.2% vs 44.19%), had cardiomegaly (51.04% vs 37.21%) and interstitial opacities (60.3% vs 47.67%). The only difference in emergency treatment was the use of nitrates, (higher in group 1 (21.9% vs 12.21%)). In-hospital mortality and the percentage of patients still hospitalised after 30 days were similar between groups, but the median stay was longer in group 1 (8 days vs 6 days). CONCLUSIONS: Renal impairment in AHF should not limit the use of loop diuretics and/or vasodilators, but early assessment of pulmonary congestion and close monitoring of the efficacy of conventional therapies is encouraged to allow rapid and appropriate implementation of alternative therapies if necessary.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Cardiorrenal/terapia , Diuréticos/administración & dosificación , Furosemida/administración & dosificación , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Síndrome Cardiorrenal/mortalidad , Síndrome Cardiorrenal/fisiopatología , Comorbilidad , Desfibriladores , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Diuréticos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Furosemida/efectos adversos , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Riñón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos
6.
Int Heart J ; 60(2): 470-473, 2019 Mar 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30745545

RESUMEN

A 41-year-old man developed cardiac arrest. A resting 12-lead electrocardiogram showed a delta wave, suggestive of preexcitation syndrome. An electrophysiological test revealed the existence of inducible atrial fibrillation and a fasciculoventricular accessory pathway (FVAP). After these examinations, idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia was suspected. For evaluating concealed Brugada syndrome, pilsicainide was administered, which diminished the delta wave and no Brugada-like electrocardiogram was observed. Ventricular double extra-stimulation from the RV apex easily induced VF, which could not be defibrillated by an external defibrillator, and later stopped spontaneously. These results established the diagnosis of FVAP and idiopathic VF, and not pre-excited atrial fibrillation or Brugada syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Fascículo Atrioventricular Accesorio , Síndrome de Brugada/diagnóstico , Cardioversión Eléctrica/métodos , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Síndromes de Preexcitación , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia , Fascículo Atrioventricular Accesorio/diagnóstico , Fascículo Atrioventricular Accesorio/fisiopatología , Fascículo Atrioventricular Accesorio/terapia , Adulto , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Desfibriladores , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Síndromes de Preexcitación/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Preexcitación/fisiopatología , Síndromes de Preexcitación/terapia , Remisión Espontánea , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
7.
Rev. Soc. Cardiol. Estado de Säo Paulo ; 28(3): 291-295, jul.-ago. 2018. graf
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | LILACS | ID: biblio-916538

RESUMEN

Um dos grandes desafios no atendimento dos pacientes nas unidades de emergência é o tratamento das arritmias ventriculares, principalmente, quando sustentadas e recorrentes, pois são de difícil tratamento e estão associadas à alta mortalidade. O principal mecanismo envolvido na sustentação das taquicardias ventriculares é o mecanismo de reentrada, devido às cicatrizes miocárdicas secundárias a diversas cardiopatias estruturais. A tempestade elétrica pode ser séria quando ocorre em portadores de desfibriladores automáticos, provocando múltiplos choques correspondentes fora do ambiente hospitalar. Nesses casos é necessária a internação hospitalar, onde medidas específicas e escalonadas de tratamento são realizadas, indo desde o manejo clínico até intervenções específicas, como programação de dispositivos eletrônicos, intervenções eletrofisiológicas ou cirúrgicas


One of the biggest challenges in the care of patients in emergency units is the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias, particularly when sustained and relapsing, as they are difficult to treat and are associated with high mortality. The main mechanism involved in the maintenance of ventricular tachycardias is the mechanism of reentry, due to myocardial scars secondary to various structural heart diseases. The electrical storm may be serious when it occurs in patients with automatic defibrillators, causing multiple corresponding shocks outside the hospital setting. In these cases, admission to hospital is necessary, where specific and stepwise treatment measures are performed, ranging from clinical management to specific interventions, such as programming of electronic devices, and electrophysiological or surgical interventions


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Marcapaso Artificial , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Propranolol/uso terapéutico , Quinidina/uso terapéutico , Verapamilo/uso terapéutico , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Desfibriladores , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Síndrome de Brugada/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Brugada/terapia , Corazón , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Amiodarona/uso terapéutico
9.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM | ID: wpr-67974

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Skin erosion is a dire complication of implantable cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators. Classical treatments involve removal of the entire generator and lead systems, however, these may result in fatal complications. In this study, we present our experience with a simplified salvage technique for exposed implantable cardiac electronic devices (ICEDs) without removing the implanted device, in an attempt to reduce the risks and complication rates associated with this condition. METHODS: The records of 10 patients who experienced direct ICED exposure between January 2012 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The following surgical procedure was performed in all patients: removal of skin erosion and capsule, creation of a new pocket at least 1.0–1.5 cm inferior to its original position, migration of the ICED to the new pocket, and insertion of closed-suction drainage. Patients with gross local sepsis or septicemia were excluded from this study. RESULTS: Seven patients had cardiac pacemakers and the other 3 had implantable cardiac defibrillators. The time from primary ICED placement to exposure ranged from 0.3 to 151 months (mean, 29 months. Postoperative follow-up in this series ranged from 8 to 31 months (mean follow-up, 22 months). Among the 10 patients, none presented with any signs of overt infection or cutaneous lesions, except 1 patient with hematoma on postoperative day 5. The hematoma was successfully treated by surgical removal and repositioning of the closed-suction drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our experience, salvage of exposed ICEDs is possible without removing the device in selected patients.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Anestesia Local , Desfibriladores , Drenaje , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hematoma , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia Recuperativa , Sepsis , Piel , Colgajos Quirúrgicos
10.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM | ID: wpr-28877

RESUMEN

A 56-year-old man with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) presented with unexplained heart palpitations, which were usually aggravated after ingesting alcohol. He had a history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery 8 years ago, and an ICD was placed (i.e. a single ventricular shock coil with integrated atrial-sensing rings [VDD ICD lead]) 1.5 years ago for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death associated with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Repeated electrocardiograms and echocardiograms showed no evidence of atrial flutter-fibrillation; this was clearly demonstrated using several atrial electrogram strips during the ICD analysis.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fibrilación Atrial , Cardiomiopatías , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca , Desfibriladores , Desfibriladores Implantables , Electrocardiografía , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Corazón , Prevención Primaria , Choque , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Trasplantes
12.
Circulation ; 132(16 Suppl 1): S51-83, 2015 Oct 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26472859

RESUMEN

This review comprises the most extensive literature search and evidence evaluation to date on the most important international BLS interventions, diagnostics, and prognostic factors for cardiac arrest victims. It reemphasizes that the critical lifesaving steps of BLS are (1) prevention, (2) immediate recognition and activation of the emergency response system, (3) early high-quality CPR, and (4) rapid defibrillation for shockable rhythms. Highlights in prevention indicate the rational and judicious deployment of search-and-rescue operations in drowning victims and the importance of education on opioid-associated emergencies. Other 2015 highlights in recognition and activation include the critical role of dispatcher recognition and dispatch-assisted chest compressions, which has been demonstrated in multiple international jurisdictions with consistent improvements in cardiac arrest survival. Similar to the 2010 ILCOR BLS treatment recommendations, the importance of high quality was reemphasized across all measures of CPR quality: rate, depth, recoil, and minimal chest compression pauses, with a universal understanding that we all should be providing chest compressions to all victims of cardiac arrest. This review continued to focus on the interface of BLS sequencing and ensuring high-quality CPR with other important BLS interventions, such as ventilation and defibrillation. In addition, this consensus statement highlights the importance of EMS systems, which employ bundles of care focusing on providing high-quality chest compressions while extricating the patient from the scene to the next level of care. Highlights in defibrillation indicate the global importance of increasing the number of sites with public-access defibrillation programs. Whereas the 2010 ILCOR Consensus on Science provided important direction for the "what" in resuscitation (ie, what to do), the 2015 consensus has begun with the GRADE methodology to provide direction for the quality of resuscitation. We hope that resuscitation councils and other stakeholders will be able to translate this body of knowledge of international consensus statements to build their own effective resuscitation guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/normas , Desfibriladores , Cardioversión Eléctrica/normas , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Niño , Cardioversión Eléctrica/métodos , Urgencias Médicas , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Educación en Salud , Paro Cardíaco/inducido químicamente , Paro Cardíaco/tratamiento farmacológico , Masaje Cardíaco/métodos , Masaje Cardíaco/normas , Humanos , Naloxona/uso terapéutico , Ahogamiento Inminente/terapia , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia
13.
Diving Hyperb Med ; 45(1): 50-6, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25964040

RESUMEN

In an emergency, life support can be provided during recompression or hyperbaric oxygen therapy using very basic equipment, provided the equipment is hyperbaric-compatible and the clinicians have appropriate experience. For hyperbaric critical care to be provided safely on a routine basis, however, a great deal of preparation and specific equipment is needed, and relatively few facilities have optimal capabilities at present. The type, size and location of the chamber are very influential factors. Although monoplace chamber critical care is possible, it involves special adaptations and inherent limitations that make it inappropriate for all but specifically experienced teams. A large, purpose-designed chamber co-located with an intensive care unit is ideal. Keeping the critically ill patient on their normal bed significantly improves quality of care where this is possible. The latest hyperbaric ventilators have resolved many of the issues normally associated with hyperbaric ventilation, but at significant cost. Multi-parameter monitoring is relatively simple with advanced portable monitors, or preferably installed units that are of the same type as used elsewhere in the hospital. Whilst end-tidal CO2 readings are changed by pressure and require interpretation, most other parameters display normally. All normal infusions can be continued, with several examples of syringe drivers and infusion pumps shown to function essentially normally at pressure. Techniques exist for continuous suction drainage and most other aspects of standard critical care. At present, the most complex life support technologies such as haemofiltration, cardiac assist devices and extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation remain incompatible with the hyperbaric environment.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/instrumentación , Aire , Lechos , Tecnología Biomédica/instrumentación , Tecnología Biomédica/métodos , Análisis de los Gases de la Sangre , Desfibriladores , Drenaje , Suministros de Energía Eléctrica/normas , Diseño de Equipo , Arquitectura y Construcción de Instituciones de Salud/normas , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Oxígeno/provisión & distribución , Seguridad , Camillas , Ventiladores Mecánicos/normas
14.
Cardiol Clin ; 32(1): 135-44, ix, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24286584

RESUMEN

Sudden cardiac deaths account for 350,000 to 380,000 deaths in the United States annually. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators have improved sudden death outcomes in patients with heart failure, but only a minority of patients with defibrillators receives appropriate therapy for ventricular arrhythmias. The risk prediction for sudden death and selection of patients for defibrillators is based largely on left ventricular ejection fraction and heart failure symptoms because there are no other risk stratification tools that can determine the individual patients who will derive the greatest benefit. There are several other pharmacologic strategies designed to prevent sudden death in patients with heart failure.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/métodos , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Desfibriladores , Electrocardiografía , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas/métodos , Pruebas de Función Cardíaca , Humanos , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Reperfusión Miocárdica/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología
15.
Diving Hyperb Med ; 44(4): 223-7, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25596835

RESUMEN

The aim of this paper is to present current controversies concerning the safety of medical devices and procedures under pressure in a hyperbaric chamber including: defibrillation in a multiplace chamber; implantable devices during hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) and the results of a recent European questionnaire on medical devices used inside hyperbaric chambers. Early electrical defibrillation is the only effective therapy for cardiac arrest caused by ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia. The procedure of defibrillation under hyperbaric conditions is inherently dangerous owing to the risk of fire, but it can be conducted safely if certain precautions are taken. Recently, new defibrillators have been introduced for hyperbaric medicine, which makes the procedure easier technically, but it must be noted that sparks and fire have been observed during defibrillation, even under normobaric conditions. Therefore, delivery of defibrillation shock in a hyperbaric environment must still be perceived as a hazardous procedure. Implantable devices are being seen with increasing frequency in patients referred for HBOT. These devices create a risk of malfunction when exposed to hyperbaric conditions. Some manufacturers support patients and medical practitioners with information on how their devices behave under increased pressure, but in some cases an individual risk-benefit analysis should be conducted on the patient and the specific implanted device, taking into consideration the patient's clinical condition, the indication for HBOT and the capability of the HBOT facility for monitoring and intervention in the chamber. The results of the recent survey on use of medical devices inside European hyperbaric chambers are also presented. A wide range of non-CE-certified equipment is used in European chambers.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores/efectos adversos , Equipos y Suministros , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/instrumentación , Neuroestimuladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Bombas de Infusión Implantables/efectos adversos , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Seguridad de Equipos , Europa (Continente) , Incendios , Humanos , Monitoreo Fisiológico
16.
Pain Physician ; 16(5): 489-96, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24077195

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulators (SCS) have been used for many years to treat a myriad of chronic pain conditions using electrical signals to diminish the perception of a painful stimulus. Because of the electrical nature of the devices, there is a concern about the potential for electromagnetic interaction between the device and lifesaving cardiac implantable cardioverters-defibrillators (ICVD). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use a swine model to evaluate the potential for interaction between an implanted SCS and ICVD using the closest possible proximity, highest stimulation settings, and most sensitive ICVD settings. METHODS: A pig was anesthetized and subsequently an ICVD and ICVD lead (Cogni 100-D and Endotak Reliance®, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) were placed into the right prepectoral region and the right ventricle, respectively. An SCS (50 cm linear ST Precision Plu octad electrode lead [Boston Scientific, Valencia, CA] with 3 mm wide contacts spaced one mm apart- ) was implanted using fluoroscopic guidance into the posterior epidural space. Remote interrogation and programming of the ICVD were performed while the SCS lead was placed in as close proximity as possible, using fluoroscopy to guide the final position of the SCS electrode. After confirming that both systems were working, appropriately 9 stimulating configurations of varying current, pulse width, and frequency, including maximal settings, were delivered through the SCS. The effects on the ICVD were recorded at 2 sensitivity settings. RESULTS: None of the tested SCS configurations caused interference with the proper functioning of the ICVD. LIMITATIONS: The anatomical proximity of the posterior epidural space and right ventricle of the swine is different from humans. While the entire pacer, including generator, was imbedded in a subcutaneous pocket, an implantable pulse generator for the SCS was not implanted, which did not allow us to study if any damage or a resetting of settings had occurred to the generator. Only one manufacturer was used in this study. Also, this study was performed in an anesthetized pig and the anatomical positions remained static. Realistically, changes in position of the devices would occur in patients who perform activities of daily living, and this can potentially shorten the distance between the 2 leads causing adverse interaction. CONCLUSION: This study clearly demonstrated the feasibility of the 2 devices coexisting and functioning appropriately in an animal model using an ICVD and SCS donated by Boston Scientific. Further studies are needed to elucidate restrictions, optimal settings and parameters in a human setting.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Desfibriladores , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Espacio Epidural/cirugía , Médula Espinal/fisiología , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Masculino , Manejo del Dolor , Porcinos , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol ; 6(4): e58-63, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23962865
19.
Heart Rhythm ; 10(8): 1209-17, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23628521

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low-voltage termination of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and atrial fibrillation has shown promising results; however, the mechanisms and full range of applications remain unexplored. OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the mechanisms for low-voltage cardioversion and defibrillation and to develop an optimal low-voltage defibrillation protocol. METHODS: We developed a detailed magnetic resonance imaging-based computational model of the rabbit right ventricular wall. We applied multiple low-voltage far-field stimuli of various strengths (≤1 V/cm) and stimulation rates in VT and ventricular fibrillation (VF). RESULTS: Of the 5 stimulation rates tested, stimuli applied at 16% or 88% of the VT cycle length (CL) were most effective in cardioverting VT, the mechanism being consecutive excitable gap decreases. Stimuli given at 88% of the VF CL defibrillated successfully, whereas a faster stimulation rate (16%) often failed because the fast stimuli did not capture enough tissue. In this model, defibrillation threshold energy for multiple low-voltage stimuli at 88% of VF CL was 0.58% of the defibrillation threshold energy for a single strong biphasic shock. Based on the simulation results, a novel 2-stage defibrillation protocol was proposed. The first stage converted VF into VT by applying low-voltage stimuli at times of maximal excitable gap, capturing large tissue volume and synchronizing depolarization; the second stage terminated VT. The energy required for successful defibrillation using this protocol was 57.42% of the energy for low-voltage defibrillation when stimulating at 88% of VF CL. CONCLUSIONS: A novel 2-stage low-voltage defibrillation protocol using the excitable gap extent to time multiple stimuli defibrillated VF with the least energy by first converting VF into VT and then terminating VT.


Asunto(s)
Cardioversión Eléctrica/métodos , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia , Animales , Simulación por Computador , Desfibriladores , Conejos
20.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 137(44): 2251-5, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23093395

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although most laypersons have incomplete knowledge of first aid, the placement of automated external defibrillators (AED) on public places suggests AED application by laypersons. Unfortunately, previous results are disappointing; many people don't even recognize AED. Therefore, most authors suggest to force medical education about sudden cardiac death and AED use among laypersons. We wanted to find out whether intensive medical education can improve the recognition of AED at public places and the attendance to acquire knowledge in first aid. METHODS: In 2001 eight AED were placed in the amusement swimming park "LAGO - die Therme". Contemporaneously, we started public education regarding sudden cardiac death, resuscitation and AED among layperson visiting the LAGO. After 10 years we interviewed the visitors with special regard to their knowledge of first aid and AED use. RESULTS: 531 persons (260 men, age 48,4 ± 21,9 [range 8-95] years) fulfilled the questionnaire. 59 (11,1%) stated heart disorder, 219 (41,2%) at least one cardiovascular risk factor. As ten years ago, knowledge of first-aid (59,1%) and AED use (45,2%) was poor, especially among persons younger than 17 years or older than 67 years. 398 (75%) of the interviewed visitors recognized the installed AED, 511 (96,2%) supported the placement of AED. CONCLUSION: The placement of AED on public places in combination with an intensive medical education results in a high acceptance and recognition of AED. Nevertheless, following our date it seems to be doubtful that this results automatically in a higher attendance to acquire knowledge in first-aid and AED use.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/educación , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Desfibriladores , Educación Médica , Primeros Auxilios , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Balneología , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Femenino , Alemania , Colonias de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Cardiopatías/complicaciones , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA