[Assessment of quality in day-case hand surgery]. / Démarche d'assurance qualité en chirurgie ambulatoire de la main.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of satisfaction in terms of pain relief and comfort among patients receiving different postoperative analgesia protocols after hand surgery under regional anaesthesia in a day care unit. METHODS: Cohort study among patients after hand surgery under regional anaesthesia during two consecutive three months time periods, with patient stratification according to the expected pain level with different balanced analgesia protocols (group A: carpal tunnel, group B: other surgery without bone involvement, group C: bone surgery). A telephone survey, scoring analgesia and comfort, each with a numerical (0-10) scale was conducted on days 1 and 7. During the first period analgesia for groups A and B was the same (acetaminophen-dextropropoxyphene or acetaminophen-codeine) and group C patients were treated with acetaminophen-ketoprofen-tramadol. In the second period analgesia was reduced for group A (acetaminophen alone) and increased for group B (acetaminophen-ketoprofen-tramadol) and group C (duration increased from 3 to 7 days). RESULTS: For carpal tunnel surgery, analgesia with acetaminophen alone was efficient, (Pain scale [PS] d0=2[0-10], PS d1=1 [0-10] and PS d2-d4=0,5 [0-10]). This surgery does not elicit important pain, there is no benefit in adding other analgesics. For group B, a significant improvement in postoperative pain was observed (postoperative d1 p<0.03) with a major increase in side effects (2/57 vs 17/48 p<0.001). For group C, therapeutic changes were ineffective (PS d0=2 vs 3.5 et PS d1=3 vs 5 [NS]) and we noticed an increase in side effects (p<0.05). One third of all patients are totally satisfied on day 7, logistic regression showing the role of inefficient analgesia in late postoperative period (PS>2 between d2-d4). Between day 1 and day 7, 20% of the patients change their point of view, those who feel less satisfied on day 7 complained of a more severe postoperative pain between day 2 and 4 (p<0.001) and between day 5-7 (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: For hand surgery on day case, quality of late postoperative analgesia (day 2-day 7) is strongly related to patient's satisfaction on day 7.

Analgesic effect of electroacupuncture in postthoracotomy pain: a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The role of electroacupuncture in postthoracotomy pain control is uncertain. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the role of electroacupuncture in the management of early postthoracotomy wound pain. METHODS: A total of 27 patients with operable non-small cell lung carcinoma who received thoracotomy were recruited and randomized to receive either electroacupuncture or sham acupuncture in addition to routine oral analgesics and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for postoperative pain control. All patients received acupuncture twice daily with visual analog pain score recorded for the first 7 postoperative days. Specific chest acupoints (LI 4, GB 34, GB 36, and TE 8) were targeted. Patient-controlled analgesia was used for the first 3 postoperative days in all patients, and the cumulative dosage used was recorded. RESULTS: Two patients were excluded after randomization because of complications unrelated to acupuncture. Interventions and data collection were completed for the remaining 25 patients (13 in the electroacupuncture group; 12 in the sham acupuncture group). There was a trend for lower visual analog scale pain scores in the electro-acupuncture group between postoperative days 2 and 6, although this did not reach statistical significance. The cumulative dose of patient-controlled analgesia morphine used on postoperative day 2 was significantly lower in the electroacupuncture group (7.5 +/- 5 mg versus 15.6 +/- 12 mg; p < 0.05). Such delay of onset of pain control may be related to the frequency of electroacupuncture used. CONCLUSIONS: Electroacupuncture may reduce narcotic analgesic usage in the early postoperative period. A prospective randomized controlled trial using different electroacupuncture frequency is warranted to verify this benefit.

Estudio comparativo de las dosis de opioides recomendadas por la asociación internacional para el estudio del dolor (IASP) y de las dosis permitidas en Venezuela / Comparative study of opioids recomended dosages by the international association for the study of pain and the allowed dosages in Venezuela

Uno de los cuatro componentes del programa de control del cáncer de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) es el tratamiento del dolor asociado al cáncer y las restricciones gubernamentales con respecto aluso de opioides, constituye uno de los obstáculos de este programa. Con la idea de identificar las barreras en nuestro país se realizó este estudio para comparar las dosis recomendadas de opioides por la Asociación Internacional para el estudio del dolor (IASP) y las dosis permitidas por el Ministerio de Sanidad y Asistencia Social (MSAS) en Venezuela. Los datos fueron obtenidos de la Gaceta Oficial y del Task Force on Acute Pain de la IASP y se observó que todas las dosis permitidas de opioides por el MSAS en Venezuela se escuentran entre un 40 por ciento y 75 por ciento de las dosis recomendadas (IASP), con un menor porcentaje para la morfina, a pesar de ser este analgésico indicador de un buen tratamiento del dolor por cáncer. Sin embargo estas restricciones gubernamentales fueron modificadas y los médicos tratantes pueden aumentar las dosis si hacen un informe médico que lo justifique. La gaceta oficial no determina las dosis por vía oral ni parental de algunos opioides disponibles en el país