A retrospective cohort study on the influencing factors for macrosomia in singleton pregnancies.

To explore the influencing factors of singletons with macrosomia, and to develop interventions for the prevention of macrosomia. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 26,379 pregnant women who established the Maternal and Child Health Record and gave birth from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 in a community health service center in Haidian district, Beijing. The study analyzed factors such as maternal age, ethnicity, education level, prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), parity, folic acid supplementation, gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational hyper, hypothyroidism in pregnancy (including subhypothyroidism), hyperthyroidism in pregnancy, and infant gender. Univariate analysis was performed using the χ2 test, and multivariate analysis was performed using non-conditional multivariate logistic regression analysis. Out of 26,379 live births, 5.8% (1522/26,379) were macrosomia and 94.2% (24,857/26,379) were non-macrosomia. Univariate analysis revealed that maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, education level, parity, hypothyroidism during pregnancy, and infant gender were identified as influencing factors for macrosomia (P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that maternal age ≥ 35 years, education level of high school or below, pre-pregnancy BMI, hypothyroidism, male infant, and parity were all influencing factors for macrosomia (P < .05). Prepregnancy overweight or obesity, male infants, multiparity, and low education level are risk factors for macrosomia. Multiple factors can contribute to macrosomia, and therefore, maternal health care should be strengthened, and early interventions should be taken for the above-mentioned factors in the local area.

Diabetes in pregnancy: Women's views of care in a multi-ethnic, low socioeconomic population with midwifery continuity-of-care.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes in pregnancy is diagnosed in 6% of pregnancies annually in Aotearoa-New Zealand, disproportionately affecting multi-ethnic, low socio-economic women. Little is known about the care experience of this population within the model of midwifery continuity-of-care, including views of telehealth care. AIM: Increase understanding of the experience of diabetes in pregnancy care, including telehealth, among multi-ethnic, low socio-economic women receiving midwifery continuity-of-care. METHODS: Qualitative interview study with primarily indigenous and migrant women who had diabetes in pregnancy and gave birth 6-18 months previously. Interviewers were matched with participants by ethnicity. Transcripts were analysed using Framework analysis. RESULTS: Participants were 19 women (5 Maori, 5 Pacific Peoples, 5 Asian, 4 European). Data analysis revealed three key themes: 1) 'shock, shame, and adjustment' to the diagnosis 2) 'learning to manage diabetes in pregnancy' and 3) 'preparation for birth and beyond' to the postpartum period. DISCUSSION: Receiving the diagnosis of diabetes in pregnancy was a shock. Managing diabetes during pregnancy was particularly challenging for indigenous and migrant women, who wished for better access to culturally appropriate dietary and lifestyle information. Women appreciated having options of telehealth and face-to-face consultations. Preparation for birth and postpartum diabetes follow-up were areas requiring significant improvement. Challenges were mitigated through care from a consistent diabetes specialist midwife and community-based midwifery continuity-of-care. CONCLUSION: Midwives were the backbone of diabetes in pregnancy care for this multi-ethnic, low socio-economic population. Care could be improved with more culturally appropriate diet and lifestyle information, better birth preparation, and expanded postpartum diabetes support.

The association between prepregnancy dietary fatty acids and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Epidemiologic studies have examined the association between dietary fatty acids and type 2 diabetes risk in general populations. Evidence regarding their associations with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate prepregnancy fatty acids intake in relation to GDM risk. METHODS: 3,725 pregnant women from the Xi'an Birth Cohort Study who were free of previous GDM or pre-existing chronic diseases were included. Dietary intake of total fat and individual fatty acids (including saturated fatty acids [SFA], monounsaturated fatty acids [MUFA], polyunsaturated fatty acids [PUFA], and trans fatty acids) during the year preceding pregnancy was assessed by a validated food-frequency questionnaire before 16 weeks of gestation. GDM was confirmed based on the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. Log-binomial or modified Poisson regression models were applied to estimate the relative risks (RRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95%CIs) of GDM for fatty acids intake. Generalized linear regression was adopted for blood glucose levels with fatty acids intake. RESULTS: 644 (17.3 %) incident GDM cases were confirmed in our study. Participants in the highest intake of total fat substituting for carbohydrates had a 33 % reduced risk of GDM than those in the lowest intake (RR:0.67; 95%CI:0.55,0.81). For individual fatty acids, only PUFA intake was associated with a lower risk of GDM, with RR comparing extreme tertiles of 0.61 (95%CI:0.49,0.76). Each 2 % increase in energy from total fat and PUFA replacing carbohydrates decreased the risk of GDM by 6 % (95%CI:3 %,9 %) and 15 % (95%CI:9 %,21 %), respectively. Similar inverse associations with intake of total fat and PUFA were observed for blood glucose levels. Further analyses of SFA substitution showed that replacement of 2 % energy from SFA with PUFA and MUFA was associated with 26 % (RR:0.74; 95%CI:0.62,0.88) and 30 % (RR:0.70; 95%CI:0.50, 0.98) decreased risk of GDM, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Greater intake of total fat and PUFA before pregnancy was associated with lower risk of GDM when replacing carbohydrates. Substitution SFA with PUFA and MUFA was also inversely associated with GDM risk. These findings support the important role of optimal dietary fatty acids composition in the prevention of GDM.

Integrated health system intervention aimed at reducing type 2 diabetes risk in women after gestational diabetes in South Africa (IINDIAGO): a randomised controlled trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: South Africa has a high prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM; 15%) and many of these women (48%) progress to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) within 5 years post partum. A significant proportion (47%) of the women are not aware of their diabetes status after the index pregnancy, which may be in part to low postnatal diabetes screening rates. Therefore, we aim to evaluate a intervention that reduces the subsequent risk of developing T2DM among women with recent GDM. Our objectives are fourfold: (1) compare the completion of the nationally recommended 6-week postpartum oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between intervention and control groups; (2) compare the diabetes risk reduction between control and intervention groups at 12 months' post partum; (3) assess the process of implementation; and (4) assess the cost-effectiveness of the proposed intervention package. METHODS AND ANALYSES: Convergent parallel mixed-methods study with the main component being a pragmatic, 2-arm individually randomised controlled trial, which will be carried out at five major referral centres and up to 26 well-baby clinics in the Western Cape and Gauteng provinces of South Africa. Participants (n=370) with GDM (with no prior history of either type 1 or type 2 diabetes) will be recruited into the study at 24-36 weeks' gestational age, at which stage first data collection will take place. Subsequent data collection will take place at 6-8 weeks after delivery and again at 12 months. The primary outcome for the trial is twofold: first, the completion of the recommended 2-hour OGTT at the well-baby clinics 6-8 weeks post partum, and second, a composite diabetes risk reduction indicator at 12 months. Process evaluation will assess fidelity, acceptability, and dose of the intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted from University of Cape Town (829/2016), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (M170228), University of Stellenbosch (N17/04/032) and the University of Montreal (2019-794). The results of the trial will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations to key South African Government stakeholders and health service providers. PROTOCOL VERSION: 1 December 2022 (version #2). Any protocol amendments will be communicated to investigators, Human Ethics Research Committees, trial participants, and trial registries. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PAN African Clinical Trials Registry (https://pactr.samrc.ac.za) on 11 June 2018 (identifier PACTR201805003336174).

Ferritin and iron supplements in gestational diabetes mellitus: less or more?

Iron metabolism has been found to be closely related to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Excessive ferritin levels were shown to be related to an increased risk of GDM because of iron overload which may lead to insulin resistance and ß-cell injury by enhancing oxidative stress and inflammatory responses. On the contrary, insufficient ferritin levels can cause a number of obstetric complications, such as high incidence rates of anaemia and gestational hypertension. Therefore, high or low ferritin levels may have adverse effects on the mother and the foetus, putting clinicians in a dilemma when giving pregnant women iron supplements. This also explains why there have been more conflicting findings in the studies on dietary or oral iron supplementation during pregnancy. Hence, there is an urgent need for more evidence and strategies for appropriate recommendations for ferritin levels and iron supplementation during pregnancy to prevent iron insufficiency without causing iron overload and increasing the risk of GDM. Therefore, we gave an updated review on the association of GDM with ferritin metabolism, ferritin levels and iron supplementation based on the summary of the latest research.

The Efficacy and Safety of Myo-inositol Supplementation for the Prevention of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Overweight and Obese Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Myo-inositol has emerged as one of the preventive therapies for the development of gestational diabetes mellitus in at-risk populations. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of myo-inositol in decreasing the incidence of gestational diabetes in overweight and obese pregnant women. Methodology: This meta-analysis was conducted using the standard Cochrane methodology and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled overweight and obese pregnant women and used myo-inositol supplementation. The primary outcome was the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus at 24-28 weeks. Secondary outcomes included cesarean section rate, the incidence of pregnancy-induced hypertension, macrosomia and preterm delivery. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for dichotomous data. Results: Six RCTs were included. Compared to standard micronutrient supplementation, standard dose of myo-inositol (4 g) may reduce the incidence of GDM (RR 0.54; CI [0.30, 0.96]; n = 887 women), but the certainty of evidence is low to very low. With low-dose myo-inositol however, evidence is uncertain about its benefit on the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus in overweight and obese women with RR 0.71; CI [0.14, 3.50]. No adverse effects were noted. For the secondary outcomes, standard dose myo-inositol appears to reduce the incidence of pregnancy-induced hypertension and preterm delivery, but the certainty of evidence is low to very low. Conclusion: Current evidence is uncertain on the potential benefit of myo-inositol supplementation in overweight and obese pregnant women. While studies show that 4 g myo-inositol per day may decrease the incidence of GDM, pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-term birth with no associated risk of serious adverse events, the certainty of evidence is low to very low. Future high-quality trials may provide more compelling evidence to support practice recommendations.

Predicting comorbidities of pregnancy: A comparison between total and free 25(OH)D and their associations with parathyroid hormone.

Pregnancy is a unique time when amplified sex steroid concentrations promote an escalation in vitamin D binding protein (DBP) synthesis, associated with increased total vitamin D and metabolites, including 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D). Free 25(OH)D concentration increases disproportionately to total 25(OH)D during pregnancy, likely an adaptation to supply the woman and fetus with readily available 25(OH)D. Highlighting the importance of the calcium metabolic stress during pregnancy, the interactional relationship between serum 25(OH)D and PTH has been evaluated. Maternal total 25(OH)D and total 25(OH)D/iPTH are measures of vitamin D status and biomarkers for potential pregnancy complications. It has been proposed that free 25(OH)D and free 25(OH)D/iPTH could be better indicators of vitamin D status and predictors of pregnancy complications such as gestational diabetes (GDM), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and preterm delivery. This study aims to determine if free 25(OH)D and its association with PTH are more accurate predictors of comorbidities of pregnancy than total 25(OH)D and its association with PTH. In this post hoc analysis of the Kellogg Pregnancy Study, a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, participants included 297 women with singleton pregnancies: 191 participants were randomized into a group receiving a daily prenatal (400 IU vitamin D3) while 196 received a prenatal plus extra supplementation (4400 IU vitamin D3). Blood and urine samples were collected monthly. 297 participants' serum total 25(OH)D concentrations were measured using radioimmunoassay at baseline (visit 1) and 5-7 months' gestation (visit 6-7). 93 participants' serum free 25(OH)D and PTH concentrations were measured using ELISA and immunoradiometric assay, respectively, at visit 1 and 6-7; 66 participants had paired samples and were included in this analysis. Data were analyzed using SAS 9.4, Cary, N.C. or SPSS v28, IBM Corporation, Armonk, N.Y. Results were considered significant with a p < 0.05. A significant relationship exists between the ratio of total 25(OH)D/iPTH and free 25(OH)D/iPTH grouped by total 25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/mL and < 30 ng/mL as an indicator of maternal vitamin D status. There was a statistically significant relationship between lower mean free 25(OH)D/iPTH and the development of GDM at visit 1 (p = 0.0003) and at visit 6-7 (p = 0.001) while total 25(OH)D/iPTH and GDM were significantly related only at visit 1 (p = 0.029). In this exploratory cohort, neither free 25(OH)D/iPTH nor total 25(OH)D/iPTH were significantly associated with increased incidence of preterm delivery, hypertensive disorders, or combined comorbidities of pregnancy. An univariate logistic regression evaluating the outcome of gestational diabetes while independently controlling for independent factors showed the ratio of free 25(OH)D/iPTH was more closely associated with gestational diabetes than the ratio of total 25(OH)D/iPTH, although neither were significant. This proof-of-concept analysis suggests that the ratio of free 25(OH)D/iPTH is associated with the development of gestational diabetes throughout pregnancy while total 25(OH)D/iPTH is only associated with the outcome early in pregnancy. Further investigation is warranted to explore this relationship between calcium metabolic stress during pregnancy with a larger cohort to improve validity,reproducibility, and relevance to other pregnancy comorbidities.

Glycemic control and neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggest that strict glycemic control in twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus may not improve outcomes but might increase the risk of fetal growth restriction. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the association of maternal glycemic control with the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus-related complications and small for gestational age in twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients with a twin pregnancy complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus in a single tertiary center between 2011 and 2020, and a matched control group of patients with a twin pregnancy without gestational diabetes mellitus in a 1:3 ratio. The exposure was the level of glycemic control, described as the proportion of fasting, postprandial, and overall glucose values within target. Good glycemic control was defined as a proportion of values within target above the 50th percentile. The first coprimary outcome was a composite variable of neonatal morbidity, defined as at least 1 of the following: birthweight >90th centile for gestational age, hypoglycemia requiring treatment, jaundice requiring phototherapy, birth trauma, or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit at term. A second coprimary outcome was small for gestational age, defined as birthweight <10th centile or <3rd centile for gestational age. Associations between the level of glycemic control and the study outcomes were estimated using logistic regression analysis and were expressed as adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients with gestational diabetes mellitus in a twin pregnancy met the study criteria. The overall rate of the primary outcome was 32.4% (34/105), and the overall proportion of pregnancies with a small for gestational age newborn at birth was 43.8% (46/105). Good glycemic control was not associated with a reduction in the risk of composite neonatal morbidity when compared with suboptimal glycemic control (32.1% vs 32.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.06 [95% confidence interval, 0.77-5.49]). However, good glycemic control was associated with higher odds of small for gestational age compared with nongestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies, especially in the subgroup of diet-treated gestational diabetes mellitus (65.5% vs 34.0%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 4.17 [95% confidence interval, 1.74-10.01] for small for gestational age <10th centile; and 24.1% vs 7.0%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 3.97 [95% confidence interval, 1.42-11.10] for small for gestational age <3rd centile). In contrast, the rate of small for gestational age in gestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies with suboptimal control was not considerably different when compared with non-gestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies. In addition, in cases of diet-treated gestational diabetes mellitus, good glycemic control was associated with a left-shift of the distribution of birthweight centiles, whereas the distribution of birthweight centiles among gestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies with suboptimal control was similar to that of nongestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies. CONCLUSION: In patients with gestational diabetes mellitus in a twin pregnancy, good glycemic control is not associated with a reduction in the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus-related complications but may increase the risk of a small for gestational age newborn in the subgroup of patients with mild (diet-treated) gestational diabetes mellitus. These findings further question whether the gestational diabetes mellitus glycemic targets used in singleton pregnancies also apply to twin pregnancies and support the concern that applying the same diagnostic criteria and glycemic targets in twin pregnancies may result in overdiagnosis and overtreatment of gestational diabetes mellitus and potential neonatal harm.

Pregnancy complications and endometrial cancer in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a Korean National Health Insurance Service study.

OBJECTIVE: Polycystic ovarian syndrome is associated with diverse pregnancy related complications and endometrial cancer. However, research on the relationship between pregnancy complications and endometrial cancer in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome is scarce. We aimed to examine the association between gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy induced hypertension, and preterm birth and the risk of endometrial cancer in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. METHODS: We analyzed data from the National Health Information Database established by the Korean National Health Insurance Service between January 2002 and December 2019. We included women with gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy induced hypertension, preterm birth, and endometrial cancer from among the polycystic ovarian syndrome population. All conditions were diagnosed according to the Korean Informative Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes. Age, area of residence, income, body mass index, waist circumference, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein, triglycerides, fasting blood sugar, and creatinine levels were included as covariates in the multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 467 221 women with polycystic ovarian syndrome included, 5099 had endometrial cancer. Age, residence, income, body mass index, waist circumference, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein, triglycerides, fasting blood sugar, and creatinine levels differed significantly between the endometrial cancer and non-endometrial cancer groups (p≤0.001-0.032). Among the polycystic ovarian syndrome population, the odds ratios (ORs) of endometrial cancer were 1.50, 1.43, and 1.23 in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy induced hypertension, and preterm birth, respectively, compared with those without a history of these conditions (OR 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32 to 1.69, p<0.001; 1.43, 1.04 to 1.97, p=0.027; and 1.23, 1.05 to 1.45, p=0.011, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a history of pregnancy complications (gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy induced hypertension, and preterm birth) increases the risk of endometrial cancer in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome.

The relationship between urinary selenium levels and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A nested case-control study.

Background: Selenium (Se) is an essential trace element for the human body. Serum Se and urinary Se are also biomarkers to assess Se exposure status. However, studies focusing on the association between urinary Se and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are rare. Objective: To investigate the association between urinary Se and the risk of GDM. Methods: A nested case-control study based on a prospective birth cohort in Wuhan, China, which focuses on the effects of prenatal environmental factors exposure on pregnant women and children's health was conducted. Two hundred and twenty-six cases and 452 controls were included. Maternal urine samples were collected before GDM diagnosis, and the urinary Se levels were determined. We assessed the association of urinary Se with GDM by conditional logistic regression with maternal urinary Se level as a categorical variable, and estimated the association between Se and glucose levels by multiple linear regression. The potential modifier roles of maternal age and fetal sex have also been assessed. Results: Lower urinary level of Se was significantly associated with a higher risk of GDM (OR = 2.35 for the tertile 1, 95% CI:1.36-4.06; adjusted OR = 1.79 for the tertile 2, 95%CI:1.09-2.95; p for trend = 0.01). Fetal sex had an interaction with Se in the association with GDM. The association was more pronounced among pregnant women with female fetuses than with male fetuses. Discussion: Our study suggested a significant negative association between urinary Se and the risk of GDM, and this association may vary depending on the fetal sex.

Longitudinal plasma magnesium status during pregnancy and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study.

Emerging evidence has shown that magnesium (Mg) was associated with type 2 diabetes while few focused on abnormal glucose metabolism during pregnancy. The study is aimed at investigating the association between longitudinal changes in plasma Mg during pregnancy and subsequent risk of gestational diabetes (GDM) and exploring the possible influence of iron supplementation on the changes of plasma Mg levels. One thousand seven hundred fifty-six pregnant women from Tongji Maternal and Child Health Cohort (TMCHC) were involved. Blood samples were collected at gestational weeks 17.0 ± 0.9 and later 26.2 ± 1.4. Plasma Mg was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) with decline rates calculated. Information on general characteristics and iron supplementation was collected by questionnaires. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was conducted at 24-28 gestational weeks to diagnose GDM. Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to estimate relative risks (RR) of GDM. Median concentrations of plasma Mg were 0.69 mmol/L and 0.63 mmol/L respectively at two collections. The prevalence of hypomagnesemia at the first collection was 73% and associated with a 1.59 (95%CI: 1.07, 2.37) fold risk of GDM. Adjusted RRs were 1.74 (95%CI: 1.06, 2.83) and 2.44 (95%CI: 1.54, 3.85) for women with hypomagnesemia and followed more tertile (T2 and T3 vs. T1) of Mg decrement. Iron supplementation above 30 mg/day was found associated with more Mg decrement (25.5% and 27.5% in T2 and T3 vs. 19.5% in T1). In conclusion, hypomagnesemia during pregnancy is prevalent and associated with increased GDM risk, especially in women followed by more plasma Mg decrement during pregnancy. High-dose iron supplementation may involve more plasma Mg decrement.

Joint effect of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and folic acid supplements on gestational diabetes mellitus risk: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The joint effect of folic acid (FA) supplements and maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has not been fully addressed. This study aimed to examine the joint effect of FA supplements and pre-pregnancy BMI on GDM. METHODS: Pregnant women at 4 to 14 weeks of gestation (n = 3186) were recruited during their first prenatal visit in Qingdao from May 1, 2019, to June 27, 2021. The main outcome was GDM at 24-28 weeks' gestation. Screening was based on 75 g 2-hour oral glucose tolerance (OGTT), a fasting glucose ≥ 5.1 mmol/L, or a 1-hour result ≥ 10.0 mmol/L, or a 2-hour result ≥ 8.5 mmol/L. The interactive effect of FA supplements and pre-pregnancy BMI on GDM was examined using logistic regression analysis and ratio of odds ratios (ROR) was used to compare subgroup differences. RESULTS: Overall, 2,095 pregnant women were included in the analysis, and GDM incidence was 17.76%. Compared with women with pre-pregnancy BMI lower than 25.0 kg/m2 and FA-Sufficient supplements ≥ 400 µg/day (FA-S) population, the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of FA-S and FA-Deficiency supplements < 400 µg/d (FA-D) were 3.57 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.02-6.34) and 10.82 (95% CI: 1.69-69.45) for the obese women (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2), and the aORs of FA-S and FA-D were 2.17 (95% CI: 1.60-2.95) and 3.27 (95% CI: 1.55-6.92) for overweight women (25.0 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 30.0 kg/m2). However, the risk of GDM did not differ significantly between the FA-D and the FA-S group in pre-pregnancy obese women (ROR = 2.70, 95%CI: 0.47-2.30), or overweight women (ROR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.30-1.49). After further stratification of FA supplementation time, F-D and FA-S in obese women showed an interaction when FA supplement intake time < 3 months. However, there was no significant difference between subgroups (ROR = 1.63, 95% CI: 0.37-7.04). CONCLUSION: Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI was associated with the incidence of GDM, the dose of FA supplementation from pre-pregnancy to early pregnancy was not found to be related to the incidence of GDM. The dosage of FA supplement was not associated with GDM irrespective of maternal pre-pregnancy BMI.

Perinatal Outcomes After Bariatric Surgery Compared With a Matched Control Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perinatal outcomes associated with pregnancy after bariatric surgery within a large integrated health care system using propensity score matching. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study that evaluated perinatal outcomes in pregnant patients after bariatric surgery from January 2012 through December 2018. History of bariatric surgery was identified by using International Classification of Diseases codes and a clinical database. Primary outcomes were preterm birth (PTB), gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, impaired glucose tolerance or gestational diabetes, a large-for-gestational-age (LGA) or small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates, and cesarean birth. Propensity scores were estimated by using logistic regression that accounted for age at delivery, prepregnancy body mass index, year of delivery, parity, neighborhood deprivation index, race and ethnicity, insurance status, initiation of prenatal visit in the first trimester, smoking during pregnancy, chronic hypertension, and preexisting diabetes. Five patients in the control group were matched to each patient in the case group on linear propensity score, and modified Poisson regression was used to adjust for covariates. Sensitivity analyses by timing and type of surgery were performed. RESULTS: We identified a case cohort of 1,591 pregnancies in patients after bariatric surgery and a matched cohort of 7,955 pregnancies in patients who had not undergone bariatric surgery. Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. In multivariate models, pregnancy after bariatric surgery was associated with a decreased risk of preeclampsia (7.5% vs 10.2%, adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.86), gestational diabetes or impaired fasting glucose (23.5% vs 35.0%, aRR 0.73, 95% CI 0.66-0.80), and LGA (10.6% vs 19.9%, aRR 0.56, 95% CI 0.48-0.65) and an increased risk of SGA (10.9% vs 6.6%, aRR 1.51, 95% CI 1.28-1.78). No significant differences were observed in PTB, gestational hypertension and cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy after bariatric surgery in a racially and ethnically diverse cohort of patients is associated with decreased risk of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes or impaired fasting glucose, and LGA neonates; it is also associated with an increased risk of SGA neonates compared with pregnant patients in a matched control group.

Pregnancy thiamine and riboflavin intake and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Thiamine and riboflavin deficiencies exist to varying degrees worldwide, especially in developing countries. Evidence regarding the association between thiamine and riboflavin intake and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is scarce. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the association of thiamine and riboflavin intake during pregnancy, including dietary source and supplementation, with GDM risk in a prospective cohort study. METHODS: We included 3036 pregnant women (923 in the first trimester and 2113 in the second trimester) from the Tongji Birth Cohort. A validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire and a lifestyle questionnaire were used to assess thiamine and riboflavin intake from dietary source and supplementation, respectively. GDM was diagnosed using the 75 g 2-h oral glucose tolerance test at 24-28 weeks of gestation. A modified Poisson regression or logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between thiamine and riboflavin intake and GDM risk. RESULTS: Dietary intake of thiamine and riboflavin was at low levels during pregnancy. In the fully adjusted model, compared with participants in quartile 1 (Q1), those who had more total thiamine and riboflavin intake had a lower risk of GDM during the first trimester [thiamine: Q2: RR: 0.58 (95% CI: 0.34, 0.98); Q3: RR: 0.45 (95% CI: 0.24, 0.84); Q4: RR: 0.35 (95% CI: 0.17, 0.72), P for trend = 0.002; riboflavin: Q2: RR: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.37, 1.09); Q3: RR: 0.45 (95% CI: 0.24, 0.87); Q4: RR: 0.39 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.79), P for trend = 0.006]. This association was also observed during the second trimester. Similar results were observed for the association between thiamine and riboflavin supplement use but not dietary intake and GDM risk. CONCLUSIONS: Higher intake of thiamine and riboflavin during pregnancy is associated with a lower incidence of GDM. This trial was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn as ChiCTR1800016908.

Comparing the effects of water temperature and additives in glucose solution on pregnant women's taste, side effects, and glycemic levels during an oral glucose tolerance test: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The oral glucose tolerance test is a common method of diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus. This test causes several unpleasant side effects such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal bloating, and headache. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effect of liquid temperature and additives on pregnant women's taste perception, side effects, and glycemic levels in an oral glucose tolerance test. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a single-center, randomized, and multi- and open-arm clinical trial. A total of 399 participants receiving the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test for gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis were included. Solutions for use in the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test were prepared in 8 formulas, with the participants randomly assigned to 1 of the 8 groups: room-temperature water, hot water, cold water, hot water with tea bag, room-temperature water with tea bag, cold water with tea bag, room-temperature soda water, and cold soda water. The main study outcomes were glycemic levels, satisfaction, perceived taste, side effects, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Glycemic levels were measured when fasted and at 1 hour and 2 hours after glucose administration. Satisfaction, taste perception, and side effects were evaluated immediately after the oral glucose tolerance test, and gestational diabetes mellitus was determined on the basis of glycemic levels. RESULTS: The cold soda water solution led to a significantly higher glycemic level at 1 hour after glucose intake compared with room-temperature soda water solution (P=.009). Glucose formula was found to not significantly affect gestational diabetes mellitus incidence (P>.05) or the participants' satisfaction, vomiting, headache, or abdominal bloating (P>.05). However, the formula did significantly affect perceived taste (P=.027) and the degree of nausea (P=.014). CONCLUSION: Several glucose solutions, such as cold glucose solution and any-temperature glucose solution containing a tea bag, led to slightly higher taste scores and a lower degree of nausea compared with the room-temperature water-based glucose solution. However, soda water was found to affect the glycemic level at 1 hour after glucose intake, and is not suggested for use for gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis.

Probiotic Supplement for the Prevention of Gestational Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Probiotic supplements may have some potential in preventing gestational diabetes, and this meta-analysis aims to explore the efficacy of probiotic supplements to prevent gestational diabetes. METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched, and we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of probiotic supplements on the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus. Meta-analysis was performed using the fixed-effect or random-effect model as appropriate. RESULTS: Six RCTs were finally included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control intervention in pregnant women, probiotic supplementation intervention showed no obvious impact on the incidence of gestational diabetes (OR=0.68; 95% CI=0.39 to 1.20; P=0.18), fasting plasma glucose (SMD=-0.05; 95% CI=-0.29 to 0.19; P=0.69), 2 h-OGTT (SMD=-0.07; 95% CI=-0.27 to 0.13; P=0.47), gestational age (SMD=0.04; 95% CI=-0.14 to 0.21; P=0.69) or preeclampsia (OR=1.22; 95% CI=0.83 to 1.78; P=0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Probiotic supplementation was confirmed to have no benefits for the prevention of gestational diabetes.

Pre-pregnancy health of women with pre-existing diabetes or previous gestational diabetes: Analysis of pregnancy risk factors and behavioural data from a digital tool.

AIMS: To examine health behaviours and risk factors in women with pre-existing diabetes or previous gestational diabetes mellitus who are planning pregnancy. METHODS: Health behaviour, risk factor and demographic data obtained from a digital pregnancy planning advisory tool (Tommy's charity UK) were analysed. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed, stratified by diabetes type. RESULTS: Data from 84,359 women, including 668 with type 1 diabetes, 707 with type 2 diabetes and 1785 with previous gestational diabetes obtained over a 12-month period (September 2019-September 2020) were analysed. 65%, 95%CI (61,68%) of women with type 2 diabetes and 46%, 95%CI (43,48%) with previous gestational diabetes were obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2 ), compared with 26%, 95%CI (26,26%) without diabetes. Use of folic acid supplements was low; 41%, 95%CI (40,41%) of women without diabetes and 42%, 95%CI (40,45%) with previous gestational diabetes reported taking folic acid (any dose) while 47%, 95%CI (43.50%) women with type 1 diabetes and 44%, 95%CI (40,47%) women with type 2 diabetes respectively reported taking the recommended dose (5 mg). More women with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes reported smoking (20%, 95%CI [17,23%] and 23%, 95%CI [20,26%] respectively) and taking illicit/recreational drugs (7%, 95%CI [6,10%] and 9%, 95% CI [7,11%]) compared to women without diabetes (smoking 17%, 95% CI [16,17%], drug use 5%, 95%CI [5,5%]). Alcohol consumption, low levels of physical activity and of fruit and vegetable intake were also evident. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the potential of online pregnancy planning advisory tools to reach high-risk women and emphasises the need to improve pre-pregnancy care for women with pre-existing diabetes and previous gestational diabetes, many of whom are actively seeking advice. It is also the first to describe pre-pregnancy health behaviours in women with previous gestational diabetes.

U-shaped Association Between Folic Acid Supplementation and the Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Women.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim in this study was to assess the association between folic acid (FA) supplementation before and during pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in Chinese women. METHODS: This case-control study was conducted at 2 hospitals in central China. A total of 1,300 pregnant women, including 396 GDM patients and 904 controls, participated in the study. Information on the dose and duration of FA supplementation was collected using a self-report questionnaire at enrolment (24 to 28 weeks of gestation). RESULTS: We observed a U-shaped association between FA supplementation and GDM risk that demonstrated a 228% increased risk of GDM among women who never took FA supplements, a 28% increased risk among women who took supplements containing <400 µg/day FA or took FA supplements for <1 month and a 188% increased risk among women who took supplements containing ≥800 µg/day FA for an adequate duration (>1 month before pregnancy and >3 months during pregnancy) compared with women who took supplements containing 400 to 799 µg/day FA for an adequate duration (all p<0.05). For women who took supplements containing ≥800 µg/day FA for an adequate duration, the association between FA supplementation and GDM risk appeared to be stronger among those women with a prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) of ≥25 kg/m2 than among those with a prepregnancy BMI of <25 kg/m2 (p=0.006 for interaction). CONCLUSIONS: There was a U-shaped association of FA supplementation with GDM risk; that is, FA supplementation both below and above the recommended levels may increase the risk of GDM.

The association of iron status, supplement iron in the first-trimester pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus: A nested case-control study.

AIMS: The objective of this study was to examine whether the level of iron and iron supplements in the first-trimester pregnancy is associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: This was a nested case-control study using data from an established cohort in the Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital (HPMCHH) in South China. A total of 119 patients with GDM and 238 controls were enrolled in the study. Iron status indicators were tested in early pregnancy. Information on iron supplements use was collected by questionnaires. Binary logistic regression was used to obtain odds ratio (OR). The relative excess risk of interaction (RERI) was applied to evaluate the interaction. RESULTS: We observed that pregnant women with normal ferritin levels (≥30 ng/ml) and iron supplements were associated with a 3.701-fold increased risk of GDM (OR: 3.701, 95% CI: 1.689-8.112) compared with the ferritin <30 ng/ml and without iron supplements group. Similarly, pregnant women with normal serum iron (SI) levels (≥9 µmol/L) and iron supplements were associated with a 5.447-fold increased risk of GDM (OR: 5.447, 95% CI: 2.246-13.209) compared with the SI < 9 µmol/L and without iron supplement group. We found an additive interaction between ferritin and iron supplements on the presence of GDM (RERI: 1.164, 95%CI: 0.333-1.994) and SI and iron supplements on the risk of GDM (RERI: 6.375, 95%CI: 4.494-8.256). CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with normal ferritin or SI levels and iron supplements could significantly increase the risks for GDM.

The association between serum folate and gestational diabetes mellitus: a large retrospective cohort study in Chinese population.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between folate levels and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk during the whole pregnancy. DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study of pregnant women, serum folate levels were measured before 24 gestational weeks (GW). GDM was diagnosed between 24th and 28th GW based on the criteria of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups. General linear models were performed to examine the association of serum folate with plasma glucose (i.e. linear regressions) and risk of GDM (i.e. log-binomial regressions) after controlling for confounders. Restricted cubic spline regression was conducted to test the dosage-response relationship between serum folate and the risk of GDM. SETTING: A sigle, urban hospital in Shanghai, China. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 42 478 women who received antenatal care from April 2013 to March 2017 were included. RESULTS: Consistent positive associations were observed between serum folate and plasma glucose levels (fasting, 1-h, 2-h). The adjusted relative risks (RR) and 95 % CI of GDM across serum folate quartiles were 1·00 (reference), 1·15 (95 % CI (1·04, 1·26)), 1·40 (95 % CI (1·27, 1·54)) and 1·54 (95 % CI (1·40, 1·69)), respectively (P-for-trend < 0·001). The positive association between serum folate and GDM remained when stratified by vitamin B12 (adequate v. deficient groups) and the GW of serum folate measurement (≤13 GW v. >13 GWs). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study may provide important evidence for the public health and clinical guidelines of pregnancy folate supplementation in terms of GDM prevention.