Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 313
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Ethnopharmacol ; 283: 114732, 2022 Jan 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34637967

RESUMEN

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Duhuo Jisheng Decoction (DHJSD) is the most frequently prescribed herbal formula for the treatment of osteoporosis. However, efficacy and safety of DHJSD add-on bisphosphonate medications remain unclear. AIM OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to reveal efficacy and safety of DHJSD add-on bisphosphonate medications in patients with osteoporosis through a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Five important databases were searched for RCTs on this topic, and two authors individually extracted information and data concerning study design, baseline characteristics, efficacy rate, bone mineral density (BMD), pain score, and adverse event. Meta-analysis was done mainly with risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) for BMD and pain, using random-effects model; while Peto odds ratios (PORs) were used for pooling adverse event rates due to sparse data. Point estimate was reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Seventeen RCTs (n = 1526) met eligibility criteria, and were included in this synthesis. Pooled estimates demonstrated that as compared with no DHJSD, DHJSD-B led to significantly higher efficacy rates (RR = 1.25, 95%CI: 1.19-1.31; I2 = 0%), more lumbar BMD (SMD = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.25-0.96; I2 = 20%), lower pain score (SMD = -1.10, 95%CI: 1.40-0.79; I2 = 33%), and lower overall adverse event rates (POR = 0.40; 95%CI: 0.20-0.97; I2 = 27%). CONCLUSION: Adding DHJSD on bisphosphonate medications seems to be an effective and safe strategy in treating patients with osteoporosis.


Asunto(s)
Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/administración & dosificación , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
2.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 25(9): 3557-3566, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34002830

RESUMEN

Osteoporosis is a metabolic disease of the skeletal system which currently affects over 200 million patients worldwide. The WHO criteria define osteoporosis as low bone mineral density, with a T-score ≤ -2.5 found in the spine, the neck of the femur, or during a full hip examination. Osteoporosis considerably reduces a patient's quality of life. QoL should be carefully evaluated before fractures occur to enable the development of an appropriate treatment plan. The progression of osteoporosis may be significantly inhibited by following a proper diet, leading a healthy lifestyle, taking dietary supplements, and receiving appropriate treatment. Education and the prevention of the disease play a major role. Potentially modifiable risk factors for osteoporosis are vitamin D deficiency, smoking, alcohol consumption, low calcium intake, low or excessive phosphorus intake, protein deficiency or a high-protein diet, excessive consumption of coffee, a sedentary lifestyle or lack of mobility, and insufficient exposure to the sun. Pharmaceutical treatment for osteoporosis involves bisphosphonates, calcium and vitamin D3, denosumab, teriparatide, raloxifene, and strontium ranelate. Data indicates that 30%-50% of patients do not take their medication correctly. Other methods of treatment include exercise, kinesitherapy, treatment at a health resort, physical therapy, and diet.


Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Quinesiología Aplicada , Osteoporosis/terapia , Colecalciferol/administración & dosificación , Colecalciferol/uso terapéutico , Denosumab/administración & dosificación , Denosumab/uso terapéutico , Suplementos Dietéticos , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Clorhidrato de Raloxifeno/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Raloxifeno/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Teriparatido/administración & dosificación , Teriparatido/uso terapéutico , Tiofenos/administración & dosificación , Tiofenos/uso terapéutico
3.
Drug Deliv ; 28(1): 37-53, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33336610

RESUMEN

Some cancers such as human breast cancer, prostate cancer, and lung cancer easily metastasize to bone, leading to osteolysis and bone destruction accompanied by a complicated microenvironment. Systemic administration of bisphosphonates (BP) or denosumab is the routine therapy for osteolysis but with non-negligible side effects such as mandibular osteonecrosis and hypocalcemia. Thus, it is imperative to exploit optimized drug delivery systems, and some novel nanotechnology and nanomaterials have opened new horizons for scientists. Targeted and local drug delivery systems can optimize biodistribution depending on nanoparticles (NPs) or microspheres (MS) and implantable biomaterials with the controllable property. Drug delivery kinetics can be optimized by smart and sustained/local drug delivery systems for responsive delivery and sustained delivery. These delicately fabricated drug delivery systems with special matrix, structure, morphology, and modification can minimize unexpected toxicity caused by systemic delivery and achieve desired effects through integrating multiple drugs or multiple functions. This review summarized recent studies about optimized drug delivery systems for the treatment of cancer metastatic osteolysis, aimed at giving some inspiration in designing efficient multifunctional drug delivery systems.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Nanoestructuras/química , Osteólisis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteólisis/patología , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Materiales Biocompatibles , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Portadores de Fármacos/química , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/administración & dosificación , Terapia Genética/métodos , Humanos , Hidrogeles/administración & dosificación , Osteoclastos/metabolismo , Osteogénesis/fisiología , Fototerapia/métodos , Andamios del Tejido
4.
BMJ Case Rep ; 13(10)2020 Oct 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33033001

RESUMEN

A 76-year-old woman was treated with oral bisphosphonate, alendronate, for osteoporosis in an outpatient clinic. Routine blood tests 4 months after alendronate prescription surprisingly revealed severe hypophosphataemia. The patient was hospitalised and treated with intravenous and oral phosphate supplements. Alendronate was later reintroduced as treatment for osteoporosis and the patient once again presented with severe hypophosphataemia in subsequent routine blood tests. The patient had only presented with lower extremity pain, muscle weakness and difficulty walking. Blood tests in the emergency department both times reconfirmed severe hypophosphataemia. Plasma (p-)ionised calcium levels were normal or slightly elevated and p-parathyroid hormone levels were normal or slightly suppressed. The p-25-hydroxyvitamin-D and p-creatine were in the normal range. Critical illness, malabsorption, nutritional issues and genetics were reviewed as potential causes but considered unlikely. Phosphate levels were quickly restored each time on replacement therapy and the case was interpreted as bisphosphonate-induced severe hypophosphataemia.


Asunto(s)
Alendronato , Difosfonatos , Hipofosfatemia , Osteoporosis , Anciano , Alendronato/administración & dosificación , Alendronato/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Calcio/sangre , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Humanos , Hipofosfatemia/sangre , Hipofosfatemia/inducido químicamente , Hipofosfatemia/fisiopatología , Hipofosfatemia/terapia , Osteoporosis/sangre , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Hormona Paratiroidea/sangre , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Vitamina D/sangre
5.
Drugs ; 80(15): 1537-1552, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32725307

RESUMEN

The incidence of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease increases with age, and there are potentially shared mechanistic associations between the two conditions. It is therefore highly relevant to understand the cardiovascular implications of osteoporosis medications. These are presented in this narrative review. Calcium supplementation could theoretically cause atheroma formation via calcium deposition, and in one study was found to be associated with myocardial infarction, but this has not been replicated. Vitamin D supplementation has been extensively investigated for cardiac benefit, but no consistent effect has been found. Despite findings in the early 21st century that menopausal hormone therapy was associated with coronary artery disease and venous thromboembolism (VTE), this therapy is now thought to be potentially safe (from a cardiac perspective) if started within the first 10 years of the menopause. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are associated with increased risk of VTE and may be related to fatal strokes (a subset of total strokes). Bisphosphonates could theoretically provide protection against atheroma. However, data from randomised trials and observational studies have neither robustly supported this nor consistently demonstrated the potential association with atrial fibrillation. Denosumab does not appear to be associated with cardiovascular disease and, although parathyroid hormone analogues are associated with palpitations and dizziness, no association with a defined cardiovascular pathology has been demonstrated. Finally, romosozumab has been shown to have a possible cardiovascular signal, and therefore post-market surveillance of this therapy will be vital.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Placa Aterosclerótica/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Calcio/administración & dosificación , Calcio/efectos adversos , Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/efectos adversos , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/métodos , Humanos , Incidencia , Menopausia/efectos de los fármacos , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Osteoporosis/etiología , Placa Aterosclerótica/inducido químicamente , Placa Aterosclerótica/prevención & control , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Moduladores Selectivos de los Receptores de Estrógeno/administración & dosificación , Moduladores Selectivos de los Receptores de Estrógeno/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/inducido químicamente , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Tromboembolia Venosa/inducido químicamente , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación , Vitamina D/efectos adversos
6.
Am J Epidemiol ; 189(3): 224-234, 2020 03 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31673702

RESUMEN

Studies have shown that accounting for time-varying confounding through time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models may provide biased estimates of the causal effect of treatment when the confounder is also a mediator. We explore 2 alternative approaches to addressing this problem while examining the association between vitamin D supplementation initiated after breast cancer diagnosis and all-cause mortality. Women aged 50-80 years were identified in the National Cancer Registry Ireland (n = 5,417) between 2001 and 2011. Vitamin D use was identified from linked prescription data (n = 2,570). We sought to account for the time-varying nature of vitamin D use and time-varying confounding by bisphosphonate use using 1) marginal structural models (MSMs) and 2) G-estimation of structural nested accelerated failure-time models (SNAFTMs). Using standard adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, we found a reduction in all-cause mortality in de novo vitamin D users compared with nonusers (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73, 0.99). Additional adjustment for vitamin D and bisphosphonate use in the previous month reduced the hazard ratio (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.63). Results derived from MSMs (HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.61) and SNAFTMs (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.52) were similar. Utilizing MSMs and SNAFTMs to account for time-varying bisphosphonate use did not alter conclusions in this example.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Modelos Estadísticos , Sistema de Registros , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo
7.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 105(3)2020 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31634910

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Intravenous aminobisphosphonates (N-BPs) can induce an acute phase reaction (APR) in up to 40% to 70% of first infusions, causing discomfort and often requiring intervention with analgesics or antipyretics. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to explore the risk factors of APR in a large sample of patients with Paget's disease of bone (PDB) and to assess the possible preventive effects of vitamin D administration. METHODS: An observational analysis was performed in 330 patients with PDB at the time of N-BP infusion. Then, an interventional study was performed in 66 patients with active, untreated PDB to evaluate if vitamin D administration (oral cholecalciferol 50 000 IU/weekly for 8 weeks before infusion) may prevent APR. RESULTS: In a retrospective study, APR occurred in 47.6% and 18.3% of naive or previously treated patients, respectively. Its prevalence progressively increased in relation to the severity of vitamin D deficiency, reaching 80.0% in patients with 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels below 10 ng/mL (relative risk (RR) = 3.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-4.7, P < .0001), even in cases previously treated with N-BPs. Moreover, APR occurred more frequently in patients who experienced a previous APR (RR = 2.8; 95% CI 1.5-5.2; P < .001) or in carriers of SQSTM1 mutation (RR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-4.2; P = .005). In the interventional study, vitamin D supplementation prevented APR in most cases, equivalent to a RR of 0.31 (95% CI 0.14-0.67; P < .005) with respect to prevalence rates of the observational cohort. A similar trend was observed concerning the occurrence of hypocalcemia. CONCLUSIONS: The achievement of adequate 25OHD levels is recommended before N-BP infusion in order to minimize the risk of APR or hypocalcemia in PDB.


Asunto(s)
Reacción de Fase Aguda/prevención & control , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Colecalciferol/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Osteítis Deformante/tratamiento farmacológico , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/dietoterapia , Reacción de Fase Aguda/inducido químicamente , Reacción de Fase Aguda/epidemiología , Reacción de Fase Aguda/inmunología , Administración Oral , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Suplementos Dietéticos , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteítis Deformante/sangre , Osteítis Deformante/complicaciones , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Vitamina D/sangre , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/sangre , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/etiología , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/inmunología
8.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(48): e18161, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31770261

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Epithelioid hemangioma (EH) of bone is an intermediate vascular tumor that can be locally aggressive. The optimum management of multifocal EH of bone is not well delineated. We described our experience treating one patient with multifocal EH of bone in an effort to document the effect of bisphosphonates in bone EH. PATIENT CONCERNS: In this report, a 53-year old male patient presented with back pain which was initially been diagnosed of multiple bone metastatic carcinoma by 18F-FDG PET/CT scan and bone scintigraphy. DIAGNOSIS: CT-guided bone biopsy of ilium indicated that puncture tissue had irregular hyperplasia of thick and thin-walled blood vessels, immunohistochemistry revealed positive staining for CD31 and CD34, negative for CAMTA-1, PCK and EMA, which confirmed the diagnosis of multiple EH. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with 4 times of intravenous Zometa (zoledronate, 4 mg each time) with average three-month interval. Bone metabolic markers including serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) and type I collagen cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) levels were closely monitored before and after use of bisphosphonates each time. OUTCOME: BALP and CTX were significantly lowered following intravenous Zometa and the back pain improved with integrated therapy including bone graft fusion internal fixation surgery and vertebroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: EH of multiple bones responded favorably to intravenous Zometa with improvement of bone metabolic markers. After 1 year on follow-up, the patient was doing well with no significant pain. We suggest that bisphosphonates should be considered in the treatment of multifocal osteolytic EH of bone.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Huesos , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide , Inmunohistoquímica/métodos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Ácido Zoledrónico/administración & dosificación , Biopsia/métodos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Óseas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Remodelación Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Huesos/diagnóstico por imagen , Huesos/metabolismo , Huesos/patología , Terapia Combinada , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/diagnóstico , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/metabolismo , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/patología , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Eur Urol Oncol ; 2(5): 551-561, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31411986

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Advanced prostate cancer (PCa) is treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) which results in loss of bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence to determine the most effective methods of preventing BMD loss in patients with PCa treated with ADT. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search of the Medline, Embase, and EBM Reviews databases was conducted on July 20, 2016 to identify studies on men who received an intervention to prevent osteoporosis after diagnosis of PCa and treatment with ADT. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement was followed and the studies found were critically appraised. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-five studies were included in the review and 13 had quantitative data sufficient for meta-analysis of BMD loss. Bisphosphonates led to a significant improvement in areas assessed: the mean difference was 7.09% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.05-9.13%; p<0.00001) for lumbar BMD, 4.63% (95% CI 0.87-8.4; p=0.02) for femoral neck BMD, and 3.16% (95% CI 0.09-6.23%; p=0.04) for total hip BMD. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) were less effective, exercise studies had inconsistent effects, and denosumab could not be quantitatively analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Bisphosphonates and denosumab are effective treatments in preventing BMD loss in men with PCa taking ADT. SERMs are a less effective alternative. Exercise programs are insufficient in isolation but have a role as an adjunct for holistic care. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this review we determined the best option for preventing osteoporosis in men with prostate cancer being treated with androgen deprivation therapy. We found that bisphosphonates, denosumab, and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) were effective, but exercise was not useful in isolation. We conclude that bisphosphonates, denosumab, or SERMs should be used and exercise encouraged.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Osteoporosis/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Denosumab/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Terapia por Ejercicio , Estudios de Factibilidad , Cuello Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Salud Holística , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Osteoporosis/inducido químicamente , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Moduladores Selectivos de los Receptores de Estrógeno/administración & dosificación
10.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 18(8): 679-689, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31159612

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been associated with a negative impact on bone health. Comorbid disorders in patients with epilepsy may require drugs exerting a pro-osteoporotic effect, so a possibility of untoward interactions with AEDs is probable. AREAS COVERED: This review discusses evidence related to the deteriorating influence of AEDs on bone, demonstrating generally stronger negative effects of conventional AEDs. Lamotrigine seems to be a safer AED in this regard. Further, literature data indicate that generally AEDs can lower the serum concentration of vitamin D. Importantly, pediatric patients are of greater risk of bone problems during therapy with AEDs, which is probably due to their effects on bone-forming processes. EXPERT OPINION: Supplementation with vitamin D and calcium is frequently recommended in patients taking AEDs chronically. Whether to add a bisphosphonate remains an open question due to the limited data on this issue. A possibility of negative interactions exists between AEDs and other pro-osteoporotic drugs: glucocorticoids, proton pump inhibitors and aromatase inhibitors. Depression is a frequent comorbidity in patients with epilepsy. Clinical data indicate that antidepressant drugs may also increase the risk of fractures. Again, patients with epilepsy and depression may be exposed to a greater risk of osteoporosis.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Animales , Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Calcio/administración & dosificación , Niño , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Humanos , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación
11.
BMJ Open ; 9(4): e027049, 2019 04 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30987990

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study examined patient adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis in real-world settings. METHODS: A systematic review was completed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database NHS EED) databases were searched for studies published in English language up to April 2018. Prospective and retrospective observational studies that used prescription claim databases or hospital medical records to examine patient adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonate treatment among adults with osteoporosis were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of included studies. RESULTS: The search yielded 540 published studies, of which 89 were deemed relevant and were included in this review. The mean age of patients included within the studies ranged between 53 to 80.8 years, and the follow-up varied from 3 months to 14 years. The mean persistence of oral bisphosphonates for 6 months, 1 year and 2 years ranged from 34.8% to 71.3%, 17.7% to 74.8% and 12.9% to 72.0%, respectively. The mean medication possession ratio ranged from 28.2% to 84.5%, 23% to 50%, 27.2% to 46% over 1 year, 2 years and 3 years, respectively. All studies included scored between 6 to 8 out of 9 on the NOS. The determinants of adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates included geographic residence, marital status, tobacco use, educational status, income, hospitalisation, medication type and dosing frequency. CONCLUSIONS: While a number of studies reported high levels of persistence and adherence, the findings of this review suggest that patient persistence and adherence with oral bisphosphonates medications was poor and reduced notably over time. Overall, adherence was suboptimal. To maximise adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates, it is important to consider possible determinants, including characteristics of the patients.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto
12.
Curr Treat Options Oncol ; 20(4): 26, 2019 03 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30874905

RESUMEN

Opinion statement Bisphosphonates are utilized routinely in breast cancer. In metastatic disease with bone involvement, bisphosphonates prevent or delay skeletal-related events and can improve pain control. Different agents have shown benefit compared with placebo or no treatment. While in unselected patients, comparison between zoledronic acid and pamidronate did not show a significant difference, exploratory analyses showed that in patients with osteolytic lesions or hypercalcemia, zoledronic acid is superior to pamidronate. De-escalating treatment with zoledronic acid from every 4 to every 12 weeks has been shown to provide similar control of skeletal morbidity and may result in less toxicity and reduced cost. While available data support bisphosphonate treatment for 2 years in metastatic disease, typical treatment duration is influenced by performance status with treatment discontinued only once patients are not well enough to continue receiving systemic therapy or developed treatment-related adverse events. In early-stage breast cancer, individual trials of adjuvant bisphosphonates have reported inconsistent results. However, the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group showed that bisphosphonates significantly reduce distant recurrence, bone recurrence, and breast cancer mortality, an effect observed in postmenopausal women only. The relative benefit of bisphosphonates was not influenced by receptor status, tumor grade, nodal involvement, or administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. Current guidelines support consideration of adjuvant zoledronic acid or oral clodronate for 3-5 years in postmenopausal women with early-stage disease. Although bisphosphonates are tolerated well, serious adverse events, including osteonecrosis of the jaw and renal impairment, can occur, especially for higher dose density schedules utilized in metastatic disease. Decision to include bisphosphonates in the treatment plan should be based on the anticipated absolute benefit and potential for adverse effects. In some patients with both early-stage and metastatic disease, omission of bisphosphonates is reasonable as the potential benefit from this treatment is not likely to outweigh its risks.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis/etiología , Administración Oral , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
J Bone Miner Metab ; 37(4): 730-740, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30523414

RESUMEN

Limited data are available on the safety and efficacy of anti-resorptive agents, particularly once-monthly bisphosphonates, for use in osteoporotic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We conducted a post hoc analysis of data from a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, phase III study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-monthly risedronate (RIS-OM) 75 mg tablets in Japanese osteoporosis patients with mild-to-moderate CKD. Patients who received RIS-OM 75 mg were stratified by baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; ≥ 90, ≥ 60 to < 90, or ≥ 30 to < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Safety endpoints were incidence of adverse events (AEs) and percent change from baseline in eGFR, serum creatinine, calcium, and phosphorus. Efficacy endpoints were percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTMs). In 420 patients included (age 67.7 ± 6.7 years, women 98.8%), the incidence of all AEs, gastrointestinal disorders, acute phase reaction, non-vertebral fractures, and renal and urinary disorders was not significantly different among subgroups. Interaction between subgroups and time was significant for eGFR (p = 0.010) and serum creatinine (p = 0.001) but considered to be regression to the mean and clinically insignificant. BMD significantly increased while BTMs significantly decreased from baseline with a similar degree of change among the subgroups. In conclusion, RIS-OM 75 mg showed consistent safety and efficacy in suppressing bone turnover and increasing BMD in Japanese primary osteoporosis patients with mild-to-moderate CKD. These results should, however, be interpreted with caution because the number of patients with moderate CKD was limited.


Asunto(s)
Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Ácido Risedrónico/efectos adversos , Ácido Risedrónico/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Biomarcadores/orina , Densidad Ósea , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Remodelación Ósea , Calcio/sangre , Creatinina/sangre , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/sangre , Osteoporosis/fisiopatología , Fósforo/sangre , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/sangre , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Ácido Risedrónico/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Curr Clin Pharmacol ; 13(3): 190-198, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30160216

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Osteogenesis imperfecta is a rare metabolic disorder associated with reduced mineralization of bone and corresponds to increased fracture risk. We carried out the present network meta-analysis comparing all the medical interventions for osteogenesis imperfecta. METHOD: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating the use of drugs in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. Percent change in BMD was the primary and fracture risk reduction and adverse events were the secondary outcome measures. The weighted mean difference was the pooled estimate for primary outcome and odds ratio with 95% confidence interval for the secondary outcome measures. Direct and mixed treatment comparisons between the interventions were carried out by inverse heterogeneity model. Sub-group analyses were carried out on children, adults and within bisphosphonate groups. The trial sequential analysis was carried out for the comparison of oral bisphosphonates with placebo. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies were included evaluating oral and intravenous bisphosphonates, teriparatide, anti-sclerostin antibody, high dose vitamin D and recombinant growth hormone (rGH) combined with intravenous bisphosphonates. Oral bisphosphonates and teriparatide were observed with a statistically significant increase in BMD compared to placebo. Also, only oral bisphosphonates were associated with significant reduction in the fracture risk but when the alpha error was adjusted for the information accrued till date as well as when the results of a trial were excluded, no significant difference was observed. Either low or very low quality was observed for pooled estimates of the key comparisons. CONCLUSION: Oral bisphosphonates and teriparatide significantly increase BMD but are not associated with fracture risk reduction. Of the available interventions, oral bisphosphonates could perform better than others in osteogenesis imperfecta. This evidence should be considered preliminary and may change with future head-to-head clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Fracturas Óseas/prevención & control , Osteogénesis Imperfecta/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Niño , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Osteogénesis Imperfecta/complicaciones , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación
15.
Osteoporos Int ; 29(2): 329-337, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29110061

RESUMEN

The goal of this multinational, prospective, observational study was to examine the relationship between gastrointestinal (GI) events and self-reported levels of medication adherence and persistence in postmenopausal women. A total of 73.9% of patients remained on their osteoporosis (OP) therapy at month 12, although the presence of a GI event at baseline, month 3, and month 6 significantly reduced month 12 persistence among new users. The odds of a month-12 ADEOS score ≥ 20 were significantly lower among patients who experienced a GI event between baseline and month 6. The occurrence of GI events was observed to be associated with a lower likelihood of patient adherence and persistence to OP medication. INTRODUCTION: This study examines the relationship between gastrointestinal (GI) events and self-reported adherence and persistence with initial osteoporosis (OP) therapy over the course of the first 12 months of treatment. METHODS: The Medication Use Patterns, Treatment Satisfaction, and Inadequate Control of Osteoporosis Study was a multinational, prospective, observational study examining the impact of GI events on OP management in postmenopausal women. Information regarding GI events was collected at the time of enrollment and at months 3, 6, and 12 of follow-up. Patients reported GI events and medication persistence and completed the 12-item Adherence Evaluation of Osteoporosis treatment (ADEOS) questionnaire. Multivariate logistic and general linear models examined the association between GI events at various time points and persistence and adherence at month 12. RESULTS: The study enrolled 2943 women; 22.8% were classified as new users of OP therapy and the remainder were considered experienced users. Across all patients, 68.1% reported GI events at baseline; by month 12, over 80% of subjects who completed follow-up reported at least one GI problem. The majority of patients (86.7%) were treated only with bisphosphonates at baseline. At month 12, 73.9% of patients remained on therapy; logistic regression revealed that those with GI problems by month 6 were significantly less likely to persist with treatment, after adjusting for other factors. The odds of a month 12 ADEOS score ≥ 20 (considered predictive of adherence) were significantly lower among patients who experienced a GI event between baseline and month 6. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of GI events was associated with a lower likelihood of patient adherence to and persistence with OP medication.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/inducido químicamente , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Canadá/epidemiología , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Esquema de Medicación , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/epidemiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Autoinforme
16.
Biol Trace Elem Res ; 184(2): 358-368, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29081061

RESUMEN

Increased intracellular free calcium ion (Ca2+) concentration induces excessive oxidative stress and apoptosis. Medical procedures such as zoledronic acid (Zol), bevacizumab (Bev), and dexamethasone (Dex) are usually used in the treatment of bone diseases (osteoporosis, Paget's disease, etc.) and to prevent metastasis in the bone although the procedures induce osteonecrosis of the jaw through excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Recently, we observed regulator roles of selenium (Se) on apoptosis and Ca2+ entry through transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) channels in the cancer cell lines. Therefore, Se may modulate Zol, Bev, and Dex-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis through regulation of TRPV1 channel. In the current study, we investigated the protective effects of Se on apoptosis and oxidative stress through TRPV1 in Zol, Bev, and Dex-induced osteoblast-like cell line. We used human osteoblast-like cell line (Saos-2), and the cells were divided into 12 groups as control, Zol, Bev, Dex, Se, Zol+Se, Bev+Se, Dex+Se, Zol+Dex, Zol+Dex+Se, Zol+Bev, and Zol+Bev+Se which were incubated with drugs (Zol, Bev, Dex, and Se) for 24 h. The cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration was increased by Zol, Bev, Dex, Zol+Bev, and Zol+Dex, although it was reduced by Se treatment. However, Zol, Bev, and Dex-induced increase in apoptosis, caspase 3, caspase 9, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 expression levels, and intracellular ROS production values in the cells were decreased by Se treatments. In conclusion, we observed that Zol, Bev, and Dex-induced apoptosis, mitochondrial oxidative stress, and calcium signaling are decreased in human osteoblast-like cell line by the Se treatment. Our findings may be relevant to the etiology and treatment of Zol, Bev, and Dex-induced osteonecrosis by Se.


Asunto(s)
Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Calcio/metabolismo , Mitocondrias/efectos de los fármacos , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Selenio/farmacología , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Línea Celular Tumoral , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Mitocondrias/metabolismo , Osteosarcoma/metabolismo , Osteosarcoma/patología , Sustancias Protectoras/farmacología , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno/metabolismo , Canales Catiónicos TRPV/metabolismo , Ácido Zoledrónico
17.
Am J Manag Care ; 23(12): e421-e422, 2017 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29261250

RESUMEN

In the setting of changing temporal trends in the management of osteoporosis, we examined how select characteristics of new oral bisphosphonate (BP) initiators changed over time among 94,073 women within a large, integrated healthcare organization during the period 2004 to 2012. In the earlier era (2004-2007), approximately half of women younger than 65 years initiating BP therapy (47%-54%) had osteoporosis by bone mineral density (BMD) criteria, but this proportion increased sharply in the later era (2008-2012), with 55% to 81% having osteoporosis. This trend was not evident in older women (≥65 years). The proportion of younger women with prior fracture increased from 15% in 2008 to 32% in 2012, after remaining relatively stable (10%-15%) during the earlier era. Again, this trend was not observed among older women. Thus, among women younger than 65 years, we observed a marked temporal shift in initiation of BP treatment toward women at high risk (including those with prior fracture and those with osteoporosis by BMD testing) and away from those at lower risk (such as those with osteopenia and/or no prior fracture).


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Óseas Metabólicas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Óseas Metabólicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Densidad Ósea , Enfermedades Óseas Metabólicas/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados Unidos
18.
Clin Transplant ; 31(11)2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28940569

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation (HTX) is an established therapy for end-stage heart disease. The aim of this study was to determine whether application of oral bisphosphonates is effective in preventing osseous complications after HTX. METHODS: Thirty-three cardiac transplant recipients were treated with alendronate 70 mg/wk or risedronate 35 mg/wk in combination with 1000 mg calcium and 800 IU vitamin D. Markers of bone metabolism and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were determined directly after HTX and 2 years later. Primary endpoints were changes in bone mineral density (BMD), markers of bone metabolism (osteocalcin, crosslaps), serum levels of the cytokines osteoprotegerin (OPG), receptor activator of NF kappa-B ligand (RANKL), and incidence of fractures. RESULTS: Eight patients presented with osteoporosis, and 16 patients with osteopenia by DXA without prevalent fractures. Over 2 years, the BMD improved in 2 patients from osteoporosis to osteopenia, and overall BMD remained stable, and fractures did not occur. In addition, the serum levels of OPG increased (P < .0005), and the RANKL levels (P < .001) as well as the RANKL/OPG-ratio decreased significantly (P < .0005). The serum crosslaps showed no significant changes. The BMD showed a significant association with the increased 25-vitamin D levels only in females (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In heart transplanted patients, weekly oral bisphosphonates in combination with calcium and vitamin D supplementation preserved bone mass, prevented uncoupling of bone resorption/formation and fractures. Bone density should be measured and adequately treated, that is, with regular bisphosphonates.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Óseas Metabólicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Alendronato/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Óseas Metabólicas/etiología , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/etiología , Pronóstico , Ácido Risedrónico/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
19.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20172017 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28866630

RESUMEN

Osteoporosis in childhood is uncommon, and it may be secondary to a spectrum of diverse conditions. Idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis is a primary osteoporosis of unknown aetiology present in previously well children and is a diagnosis of exclusion. We describe a 10-year-old prepubertal boy who presented with back pain of 1-week duration. His spinal X-ray showed generalised loss of vertebral body heights in keeping with osteoporosis. Endocrine and haematological work-up were normal. He was treated with vitamin D supplement and intravenous pamidronate. This case illustrates the general work-up and causes for paediatric osteoporosis, and the management for idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/diagnóstico , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Administración Intravenosa , Dolor de Espalda/etiología , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Niño , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Osteoporosis/clasificación , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico , Osteoporosis/etiología , Pamidronato , Radiografía/métodos , Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico
20.
J Clin Oncol ; 35(28): 3230-3239, 2017 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28708471

RESUMEN

Purpose To assess whether bisphosphonate (BP) use is associated with decreased breast cancer incidence in a cohort of postmenopausal women. Methods The study population included 64,438 postmenopausal women participating in the French E3N (Etude Epidémiologique auprès de femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale) prospective cohort, with data self-reported in biennial questionnaires matched with data from a drug reimbursement database. Exposure to BPs and the use of other osteoporosis treatments during follow-up were determined using reimbursement data. Other covariates (breast cancer risk factors, clinical risk factors for osteoporotic fractures, and bone mineral density surveillance) originated from the questionnaires. Hazard ratios (HRs) of breast cancer were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models, considering exposure as a time-varying variable. Results Over an average of 7.2 years of follow-up (2004 to 2011), 2,407 first primary breast cancer cases were identified. The HR of breast cancer associated with exposure to BPs was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.12). We found no effect modification by age, body mass index, time since menopause, use of hormone replacement therapy, use of calcium supplements, or use of vitamin D supplements. There was no heterogeneity across BP molecules and no trend according to cumulative dose, duration of use, or time since last use. We observed a decrease in breast cancer risk restricted to the year after treatment initiation (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.87), which was likely explained by healthy screenee bias. Finally, we did not find any variation in HRs across breast carcinomas defined by their estrogen receptor or invasive or in situ status. Conclusion In our observational cohort of postmenopausal women observed from 2004 to 2011, BP use, likely prescribed for the management of osteoporosis, was not associated with decreased breast cancer incidence.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Posmenopausia , Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA