The trend of dental check-up and prevalence of dental complications following the use of bone modifying agents in patients with metastatic breast and prostate cancer: analysis of data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service.

BACKGROUND: Bone-modifying agents (BMA) are key components in the management of cancer patients with bone metastasis. Despite their clinical benefits, the use of BMA is associated with dental adverse events (AEs) including medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). This study investigated the frequency of dental surveillance before BMA treatment and the prevalence of dental AEs including MRONJ, after BMA treatment in patients with bone metastasis from breast and prostate cancer using data from the national health insurance system. METHODS: Data, including age, cancer diagnosis, administered BMA, and dental AEs during cancer treatment, of patients with bone metastasis from breast and prostate cancer who received at least one infusion of BMA between 2007 and 2019 were extracted from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (KNHIS) dataset. RESULTS: Of the 15,357 patients who received BMA, 1,706 patients (11.1%) underwent dental check-ups before BMA treatment. The proportion of patients receiving dental check-up increased from 4.4% in 2007 to 16.7% in 2019. Referral to dentists for a dental check-up was more active in clinics/primary hospitals than general/tertiary hospitals, and medical doctors and urologists actively consulted to dentists than general surgeons, regardless of the patient's health insurance status. After BMA treatment, 508 patients (3.8%) developed dental AEs, including abscess (42.9%), acute periodontitis (29.7%), acute pericoronitis (14.9%), and MRONJ (12.5% of dental AEs cases, 0.5% of total BMA treated patients). CONCLUSIONS: Considering the long treatment period in patients with metastatic cancer, coordination between dentists and oncologists is necessary to ensure appropriate dental management before the initiation of BMA.

Regulatory Effects of Quercetin on Bone Homeostasis: Research Updates and Future Perspectives.

The imbalance of bone homeostasis has become a major public medical problem amid the background of an aging population, which is closely related to the occurrence of osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and fractures. Presently, most drugs used in the clinical treatment of bone homeostasis imbalance are bisphosphonates, calcitonin, estrogen receptor modulators, and biological agents that inhibit bone resorption or parathyroid hormone analogs that promote bone formation. However, there are many adverse reactions. Therefore, it is necessary to explore potential drugs. Quercetin, as a flavonol compound with various biological activities, is widely distributed in plants. Studies have found that quercetin can regulate bone homeostasis through multiple pathways and targets. An in-depth exploration of the pharmacological mechanism of quercetin is of great significance for the development of new drugs. This review discusses the therapeutic mechanisms of quercetin on bone homeostasis, such as regulating the expression of long non-coding RNA, signaling pathways of bone metabolism, various types of programmed cell death, bone nutrients supply pathways, anti-oxidative stress, anti-inflammation, and activation of Sirtuins. We also summarize recent progress in improving quercetin bioavailability and propose some issues worth paying attention to, which may help guide future research efforts.

Bone Health in the Transgender Population.

¼ Transgender women are more susceptible to low bone mineral density (BMD) before initiating gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), and while bone density initially improves with GAHT, it gradually declines while still remaining above baseline. Transgender women older than 50 years have a comparable fracture risk as age-matched cisgender women. Transgender men typically have normal or increased BMD before initiating and while receiving GAHT and are not at increased risk of fractures.¼ Transgender youth who receive puberty-blocking medications experience either no change or a slight decrease in BMD that returns to baseline after initiating GAHT.¼ It is important to abide by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry guidelines whenever ordering, performing, or reading a BMD scan for a gender-diverse patient.¼ There are no specific guidelines concerning vitamin D and calcium supplementation or the use of bisphosphonates in the transgender population, so the current recommendation is to abide by the guidelines for cisgender individuals.

Menaquinone-4 prevents medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw through the SIRT1 signaling-mediated inhibition of cellular metabolic stresses-induced osteoblast apoptosis.

Long-term usage of bisphosphonates, especially zoledronic acid (ZA), induces osteogenesis disorders and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients, thereby contributing to the destruction of bone remodeling and the continuous progression of osteonecrosis. Menaquinone-4 (MK-4), a specific vitamin K2 isoform converted by the mevalonate (MVA) pathway in vivo, exerts the promotion of bone formation, whereas ZA administration suppresses this pathway and results in endogenous MK-4 deficiency. However, no study has evaluated whether exogenous MK-4 supplementation can prevent ZA-induced MRONJ. Here we showed that MK-4 pretreatment partially ameliorated mucosal nonunion and bone sequestration among ZA-treated MRONJ mouse models. Moreover, MK-4 promoted bone regeneration and inhibited osteoblast apoptosis in vivo. Consistently, MK-4 downregulated ZA-induced osteoblast apoptosis in MC3T3-E1 cells and suppressed the levels of cellular metabolic stresses, including oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and DNA damage, which were accompanied by elevated sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) expression. Notably, EX527, an inhibitor of the SIRT1 signaling pathway, abolished the inhibitory effects of MK-4 on ZA-induced cell metabolic stresses and osteoblast damage. Combined with experimental evidences from MRONJ mouse models and MC3T3-E1 cells, our findings suggested that MK-4 prevents ZA-induced MRONJ by inhibiting osteoblast apoptosis through suppression of cellular metabolic stresses in a SIRT1-dependent manner. The results provide a novel translational direction for the clinical application of MK-4 for preventing MRONJ.

Safety of Inpatient Zoledronic Acid in the Immediate Postfracture Setting.

CONTEXT: Zoledronic acid (ZA) administered during the initial hospitalization for a fragility fracture improves the osteoporosis pharmacotherapy rate. Distinguishing the safety profile of inpatient ZA (IP-ZA) in this context is crucial if this approach is to be widely adopted. OBJECTIVE: To study the acute safety profile of IP-ZA. METHODS: An observational study of patients admitted to the Massachusetts General Hospital with fragility fractures who were eligible to receive IP-ZA. Patients were treated with or without IP-ZA. Acetaminophen, either as a single pre-ZA dose or standing multiple-doses-per-day regimen for 48 hours or longer after ZA infusion, was also administered along with protocolized vitamin D and calcium supplementation. Changes in body temperature, serum creatinine, and serum calcium were measured. RESULTS: A total of 285 consecutive patients, meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, are included in this analysis; 204 patients received IP-ZA. IP-ZA treatment was associated with a transient mean rise of body temperature of 0.31 °C on the day following its administration. Temperatures above 38 °C were seen in 15% of patients in the IP-ZA group and 4% in the nontreated group. Standing multiple-doses-per-day but not a single pre-ZA dose of acetaminophen effectively prevented this temperature increase. IP-ZA did not affect serum creatinine levels. Mean levels of serum total calcium and albumin-corrected calcium decreased by 0.54 mg/dL and 0.40 mg/dL, respectively, at their nadirs (Day 5). No patient experienced symptomatic hypocalcemia. CONCLUSION: IP-ZA along with standing multiple-doses-per-day acetaminophen, administered to patients in the immediate postfracture period, is not associated with significant acute adverse effects.

Comparison of Bisphosphonates Versus Teriparatide in Therapy of the Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis (GIOP): A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Osteoporosis (OP) is characterized as decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and increased risk of bone fracture. Secondary OP resulting from excess endogenous or exogenous glucocorticoid is defined as glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). Current therapeutic strategies for GIOP are similar to menopausal osteoporosis, including calcium and vitamin D supplementation, bisphosphonates, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogues (teriparatide). Previously, several published meta-analyses compared anti-osteoporotic agents for the menopausal or aging-dependent OP. However, the physiopathologic bone metabolism of GIOP is different. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of BMD enhancement, bone fracture rate and safety of bisphosphonates versus teriparatide in the therapy of GIOP. We searched databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until Jan 2023, and selected ten random clinical trials (RCT)s that compared the efficacy and/or safety of bisphosphonate versus teriparatide for GIOP patients. Teriparatide therapy increased lumber spinal BMD by 3.96% (95% CI 3.01-4.9%, p<0.00001), 1.23% (95% CI 0.36-2.1%, p=0.006) at total hip, and 1.45% (95% CI 0.31-2.58%, p=0.01) at femoral neck, respectively, compared to bisphosphonates at 18-month therapy for GIOP. Teriparatide also reduced bone fracture especially in vertebral bone (p=0.0001, RR 6.27, 95% CI 2.44-16.07), and increased bone formation and resorption marker levels. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse effects in bisphosphonate and teriparatide groups. Teriparatide showed better performance over bisphosphonate in BMD enhancement, bone fracture reduction, and bone remodeling improvement, without increasing the incidence of adverse effects.

Low-level laser therapy prevents medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw-like lesions via IL-1RA-mediated primary gingival wound healing.

BACKGROUND: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious debilitating disease caused by anti-resorption and anti-angiogenesis drugs, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. Recent studies suggested that primary gingival wound healing may effectively prevent the development of MRONJ. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of low-level light therapy (LLLT) on promoting gingival wound healing in extraction sockets of MRONJ-like mice and preventing the occurrence of MRONJ. Furthermore, we explored underlying mechanisms. METHODS: Mice were randomly divided into the Ctrl, Zol, and Zol + LLLT groups. Administration of zoledronate and tooth extraction of bilateral maxillary second molars were used to build the MRONJ model, and LLLT was locally administered into the tooth sockets to examine the effect of LLLT. Next, to explore the function of IL-1RA, we performed LLLT with interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) neutralizing antibody (named Zol + LLLT + IL-1RA NAb group) or negative control antibodies for tooth extraction in subsequent rescue animal experiments. Stereoscope observations, micro-computed tomography, and histological examination were conducted to evaluate gingival wound healing and bone regeneration in tooth sockets. The effects of LLLT on the migration capacities of zoledronate-treated epithelial cells were assessed in vitro. RESULTS: LLLT promoted primary gingival wound healing without exposed necrotic bone. Micro-computed tomography results showed higher bone volume and mineral density of the tooth sockets after LLLT. Histology analysis showed complete gingival coverage, obvious bone regeneration, and reduced soft tissue inflammation, with down-regulated pro-inflammation cytokines, like interleukin-1 beta (IL-1ß) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and up-regulated IL-1RA expression in the gingival tissue in the LLLT group. The rescue assay further showed that the effects of LLLT promoting gingival wound healing and preventing MRONJ might be partially abolished by IL-1RA neutralizing antibodies. In vitro studies demonstrated that LLLT accelerated zoledronate-treated epithelial cell migration. CONCLUSIONS: LLLT might promote primary gingival wound healing and contribute to subsequent bone regeneration of the tooth extractions in MRONJ-like lesions via IL-1RA-mediated pro-inflammation signaling suppression.

The clinical effectiveness of denosumab (Prolia®) in patients with hormone-sensitive cancer receiving endocrine therapy, compared to bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM), and placebo: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

This systematic review (SR) assessed the use of denosumab (Prolia®) to treat osteoporosis in cancer patients receiving endocrine therapy. Denosumab was found to prevent vertebral fractures and improve bone mineral density in cancer patients with osteoporosis. This is the first SR to assess treating osteoporotic cancer patients with denosumab. PURPOSE: This study assessed the effectiveness and safety of denosumab (Prolia®) compared to bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, zoledronate), selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) (bazedoxifene, raloxifene) and placebo for the treatment of osteoporosis in hormone-sensitive cancer patients receiving endocrine therapy (men with prostate cancer [MPC] on hormone ablation therapy [HAT], and women with breast cancer [WBC] on adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy [AAIT]). METHODS: Systematic literature searches were conducted in three biomedical databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Frequentist network meta-analyses and/or pairwise meta-analyses were performed on predetermined outcomes (i.e., vertebral/nonvertebral fractures, bone mineral density [BMD], mortality, treatment-related adverse events [AEs], serious AEs [SAEs], withdrawal due to treatment-related AEs). RESULTS: A total of 14 RCTs (15 publications) were included. Denosumab was found to prevent vertebral fractures in cancer patients receiving endocrine therapy, relative to placebo. Similarly, denosumab, zoledronate, and alendronate improved BMD at the femoral neck (FN) and lumbar spine (LS) in MPC on HAT, relative to placebo. Denosumab, ibandronate and risedronate improved BMD at the LS and total hip (TH) in WBC on AAIT, relative to placebo. Denosumab and risedronate improved trochanteric (TRO) BMD in WBC on AAIT, relative to placebo. Similarly, denosumab improved FN BMD in WBC on AAIT. CONCLUSION: In MPC on HAT, denosumab (relative to placebo) was effective at preventing vertebral fractures and improving BMD at the FN and LS. Moreover, in WBC on AAIT, denosumab (relative to placebo) improved BMD at the FN, LS, TH, and TRO, as well as prevent vertebral fracture.

Fanconi Syndrome Associated with Long-term Treatment with Zoledronate.

Intravenous bisphosphonate therapy is used to prevent fractures in the management of bone metastasis. However, it may induce renal damage. We herein report an 81-year-old woman with Fanconi syndrome and osteomalacia who had been diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and received treatment with zolendronate for over 5 years. Her bone markers normalized after switching zolendronate to denosmab and starting vitamin D and mineral supplementation. This case shows that chronic renal damage induced by zolendronate can cause osteomalacia. In patients with intravenous zolendronate therapy, close monitoring of renal and bone markers is needed, even under long-term therapy.

[Atypical femoral fractures due to the use of bisphosphonates. Experience of two institutions]. / Fracturas femorales atípicas por el uso de bifosfonatos. Experiencia de dos instituciones.

INTRODUCTION: bisphosphonates are used for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis with high risk of fracture, glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, Paget's disease and hypercalcemia; as well as an adjuvant for the management of hyperparathyroidism. Bisphosphonates have been associated with previously unknown adverse effects, including atypical femur fractures. OBJECTIVE: to analyze the relationship of the history of bisphosphonate (BF) use as a risk factor for presenting atypical femur fractures (AFF). MATERIAL AND METHODS: patients aged 40 years or older from two hospital centers seen from 2009 to 2018 for femur fracture were included. The radiographic studies of 441 records were reviewed, from which the fracture site was defined. Subtrochanteric (SF) and diaphyseal (DF) femur fractures were analyzed applying the criteria of the second report of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research for case definition of AFF. Finally, the consumption of bisphosphonates in these groups was investigated to estimate a measure of association. RESULTS: of the 441 clinical records, 98 (22.2%) were male and 343 (77.7%) were female with a mean age of 77.8 (40-103) years. Fifty-nine FS/FD were identified, of which 53% (31 records) were categorized as AFF. BF use was determined in 80.6% of patients with AFF and 3.57% in FS/FD. BF use was significantly associated with the presence of AFF (OR: 112, p 0.000, CI 95%: 12.6-1001). CONCLUSIONS: BF use significantly increases the risk of presenting AFF. AFF in patients who used BF occurred after a minimum consumption of 24 months.

INTRODUCCIÓN: los bifosfonatos se usan para el manejo de osteoporosis postmenopáusica con riesgo elevado de fractura, osteoporosis inducida por glucocorticoides, enfermedad de Paget e hipercalcemia; así como coadyuvante para manejo del hiperparatiroidismo. Los bifosfonatos se han asociado a efectos adversos previamente desconocidos dentro de los que se encuentran fracturas de fémur de trazo atípico. OBJETIVO: analizar la relación del antecedente de uso de bifosfonatos (BF) como factor de riesgo para presentar fracturas atípicas de fémur (FAF). MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: se incluyeron pacientes de 40 años o más de dos centros hospitalarios atendidos desde 2009 a 2018 por fractura de fémur. Se revisaron los estudios radiográficos de 441 registros, de los cuales se definió el sitio de fractura. Se analizaron las fracturas de fémur subtrocantéricas (FS) y diafisarias (FD) aplicando los criterios del segundo reporte de la American Society for Bone and Mineral Research para la definición de caso de FAF. Finalmente, se indagó el consumo de bifosfonatos en estos grupos para para estimar una medida de asociación. RESULTADOS: de los 441 registros clínicos, 98 (22.2%) fueron del sexo masculino y 343 (77.7%) del femenino, con edad promedio de 77.8 (40-103) años. Se identificaron 59 FS/FD, de las cuales 53% (31 registros) fueron catalogadas FAF. El consumo de BF se determinó en 80.6% de pacientes con FAF y en 3.57% con FS/FD. El uso de BF se asoció significativamente con la presencia de FAF (OR: 112, p 0.000, IC 95%: 12.6-1001). CONCLUSIONES: el uso de BF aumenta significativamente el riesgo de presentar FAF. Las FAF en pacientes que usaron BF se presentó tras un consumo mínimo de 24 meses.

Efficacy of guided autofluorescence laser therapy in MRONJ: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: This review aims to explore the efficacy of fluorescence-guided excision in the treatment of necrotic bone and highlights the importance of fluorescence in distinguishing viable margins from necrotic ones for a more targeted and predictable management of MRONJ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from January 1, 2008, to May 17, 2023. The Boolean search strategy with the following keywords "osteonecrosis" AND "fluorescence" was performed. Then, the articles were subjected to screening and eligibility phases. The papers about the use of autofluorescence-guided laser therapy in patients with jaw osteonecrosis were included. RESULTS: A total of 320 articles were initially identified through an electronic search, and ultimately, 17 papers were included in the qualitative analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that the VELscope system allows for clear visualization of the bone, making guided autofluorescence a precise, safe, and reliable technique.

[Therapeutic alternatives for drug-associated maxillary osteonecrosis (MRONJ): reports of two clinical cases and review of the literature]. / Alternativas terapéuticas de osteonecrosis maxilar asociada a medicamentos (ONMAM): reportes de dos casos clínicos y revisión de la literatura.

Introduction: Drug-associated Maxillary Osteonecrosis is one of the most relevant adverse effects in treatment with antiresorptive drugs such as bisphosphonates and denosumab. Oncological conditions such as multiple myeloma, breast cancer, prostate, and bone-metabolic disorders such as osteoporosis lead the indications for these antiresorptive therapies. Treatment is complex because the disease is often refractory. Pharmacological, conservative and surgical treatments are described. Objective: The aim of this study is to report two clinical cases of MRONJ treated with two different therapeutic protocols and the analysis of the available literature on these aspects based on the clinical classification defined by the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS). Conclusion: Patients who develop clinical signs of great morbidity associated with MRONJ, may see their quality of life conditioned and suffer a worsening of their underlying pathology. MRONJ treatment is conditioned by the stage of the disease, its success depends on interdisciplinary management and strict medical and dental clinical follow-up, as well as rigorous monitoring to prevent or detect future recurrences early.

Introducción: La Osteonecrosis Maxilar asociada a Medicamentos (ONMAM) constituye uno de los efectos adversos más relevantes en el tratamiento con drogas antirresortivas como bifosfonatos y denosumab. Patologías oncológicas como mieloma múltiple, cáncer de mama, próstata, y alteraciones óseas-metabólicas como la osteoporosis lideran las indicaciones para estas terapias antirresortivas. El tratamiento es complejo debido a que muchas veces, la enfermedad es refractaria a la terapéutica aplicada. Se describen tratamientos farmacológicos, conservadores y quirúrgicos. Objetivo: El objetivo de este trabajo es reportar dos casos clínicos de ONMAM tratados con dos protocolos terapéuticos diferentes y el análisis de la literatura disponible en la actualidad sobre estos aspectos en base a la clasificación clínica definida por la American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS). Conclusión: Los pacientes que desarrollan cuadros clínicos bucales de gran morbilidad como lo es ONMAM, pueden ver condicionada su calidad de vida y sufrir un agravamiento de su patología de base. El tratamiento de ONMAM está condicionado al estadio de la enfermedad, el éxito del mismo depende del manejo interdisciplinario y de un estricto seguimiento clínico médico y odontológico, así como también un riguroso monitoreo para evitar o detectar precozmente futuras recurrencias.

Development of Atypical Ulnar Fracture is Associated with Bisphosphonate Therapy and Severe Spinal Deformity: A Case Report.

Atypical ulna fracture (AUF) is relatively rare and is known to be associated with prolonged bisphosphonate (BP) use. The developmental mechanism remains unclear. We report a patient with an AUF associated with BP and severe spinal deformity. The patient was an 85-year-old woman receiving oral alendronate for 8 years without vitamin D supplementation. During regular kitchen work, she needed left upper limb support. She presented with atraumatic pain over the ulna. Radiographs revealed a transverse fracture in the proximal ulna and ulna bowing deformity. Whole-spine standing radiographs showed severe degenerative kyphoscoliosis. The skin induration with pigmentation on her left elbow that suggested prolonged overload and during standing work, coincided exactly with fracture location. This report suggests that 'direct stress', with persistent local overload on the proximal ulna, is one of the developmental mechanisms of AUF, in addition to persistent suppression of bone remodelling by prolonged BP use and vitamin D deficiency. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

Efficacy and Safety of Monthly Minodronate Therapy in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Aromatase Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Post-menopausal breast cancer (BC) patients who receive adjuvant aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy may be at increased risk of bone loss, osteoporosis, and bone fracture. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral bisphosphonate minodronate in preventing bone loss complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving AI and 80% of those with suboptimal bone mineral density (BMD) were prescribed monthly oral minodronate 50 mg every 4 weeks for 72 weeks. BMD, bone metabolism markers, incidence of bone fractures, medication compliance, and other adverse events (AE) were examined every 24 weeks following administration. RESULTS: Fifty postmenopausal BC patients with a median age of 64.0 years were enrolled. The mean value of lumbar spine BMD was higher than that of the value before the minodronate administration at each observation point. Before and after the treatment, the median serum values of Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) (mU/dl) and serum type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptide (NTX) (nmolBCE/l) were decreased from 535.7 and 18.5 to 230.1 and 11.9, respectively. No adverse grade 2 or higher event was observed throughout this study. CONCLUSION: The combined administration of minodronate and AIs was safe and effective in preventing bone loss complications in postmenopausal BC patients.

Long-Term Ligature-Induced Periodontitis Exacerbates Development of Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Mice.

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is a detrimental intraoral lesion that occurs in patients with long-term or high-dose use of anti-resorptive agents such as bisphosphonates. Tooth extraction is a known risk factor for BRONJ, and such intervention is often performed to eliminate existing pathological inflammatory conditions. Previously, we determined that ligature-induced periodontitis (LIP) is a risk factor for the development of osteonecrosis in mice, but it remains unclear whether the chronicity of LIP followed by extraction influences osteonecrosis development. In this study, we assess the effect of short-term and long-term LIP (ligature placed for 3 weeks [S-LIP] or 10 weeks [L-LIP], respectively) on osteonecrosis development in mice receiving 250 µg/kg/week zoledronic acid (ZOL). When compared to S-LIP, L-LIP caused 70% (p ≤ 0.0014) more bone loss without altering microbe composition. In the presence of ZOL, bone loss mediated by LIP was prevented and bone necrosis was induced. When the ligated tooth was extracted, histologic hallmarks of osteonecrosis including empty lacunae and necrotic bone were increased by 88% (p = 0.0374) and 114% (p = 0.0457), respectively, in L-LIP compared to S-LIP. We also observed significant increases in serum platelet factor 4 (PF4) and macrophage inflammatory factor 1 γ (MIP1γ) in mice that received ZOL treatment and had tooth extractions compared to controls, which may be systemic markers of inflammation-associated osteonecrosis development. Additionally, CD3+ T cells were identified as the major immune population in both health and disease, and we observed a 116% (p = 0.0402) increase in CD3+IL23R+ T cells in L-LIP compared to S-LIP lesions following extraction. Taken together, our study reveals that extracting a periodontally compromised tooth increases the formation of necrotic bone compared to extracting a periodontally healthy tooth and that osteonecrosis may be associated with the duration of the preexisting pathological inflammatory conditions. © 2022 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Efficacy and safety of Duhuo Jisheng Decoction add-on bisphosphonate medications in patients with osteoporosis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Duhuo Jisheng Decoction (DHJSD) is the most frequently prescribed herbal formula for the treatment of osteoporosis. However, efficacy and safety of DHJSD add-on bisphosphonate medications remain unclear. AIM OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to reveal efficacy and safety of DHJSD add-on bisphosphonate medications in patients with osteoporosis through a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Five important databases were searched for RCTs on this topic, and two authors individually extracted information and data concerning study design, baseline characteristics, efficacy rate, bone mineral density (BMD), pain score, and adverse event. Meta-analysis was done mainly with risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) for BMD and pain, using random-effects model; while Peto odds ratios (PORs) were used for pooling adverse event rates due to sparse data. Point estimate was reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Seventeen RCTs (n = 1526) met eligibility criteria, and were included in this synthesis. Pooled estimates demonstrated that as compared with no DHJSD, DHJSD-B led to significantly higher efficacy rates (RR = 1.25, 95%CI: 1.19-1.31; I2 = 0%), more lumbar BMD (SMD = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.25-0.96; I2 = 20%), lower pain score (SMD = -1.10, 95%CI: 1.40-0.79; I2 = 33%), and lower overall adverse event rates (POR = 0.40; 95%CI: 0.20-0.97; I2 = 27%). CONCLUSION: Adding DHJSD on bisphosphonate medications seems to be an effective and safe strategy in treating patients with osteoporosis.

Breast cancer therapy and bone.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and the leading cause of cancer-associated mortality. The estrogen deprivation associated with therapies used to treat this disease may result in significant loss of bone density and a consequent increase in fracture risk. Anti-resorptive osteoporosis therapies (bisphosphonates and the inhibitor of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand [RANKL] denosumab) play an important role in the mitigation of cancer therapy-induced bone loss (CTIBL), and may function as adjuvant therapy in moderate to high-risk breast cancer to prevent disease recurrence. Various international guidelines have delineated treatment thresholds based on both bone density assessment and clinical risk factors for CTIBL. The role of these bone-targeted therapies as adjuvant anti-cancer treatment is evolving. Currently, evidence supports the use of the bisphosphonates, zoledronic acid and clodronate, in this setting. Unfortunately, a focus on bone health in women with breast cancer is often not prioritized, leaving this group vulnerable to significant bone loss and subsequent fracture.

Efficacy of Zoledronic Acid in the Treatment of Nonmalignant Painful Bone Marrow Lesions: A Triple-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Clinical Trial (ZoMARS).

Bone marrow lesions (BML) represent areas of deteriorated bone structure and metabolism characterized by pronounced water-equivalent signaling within the trabecular bone on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). BML are associated with repair mechanisms subsequent to various clinical conditions associated with inflammatory and non-inflammatory injury to the bone. There is no approved treatment for this condition. Bisphosphonates are known to improve bone stability in osteoporosis and other bone disorders and have been used off-label to treat BML. A randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial was conducted to assess efficacy and safety of single-dose zoledronic acid (ZOL) 5 mg iv with vitamin D 1000 IU/d as opposed to placebo with vitamin D 1000 IU/d in 48 patients (randomized 2:1) with BML. Primary efficacy endpoint was reduction of edema volume 6 weeks after treatment as assessed by MRI. After treatment, mean BML volume decreased by 64.53% (±41.92%) in patients receiving zoledronic acid and increased by 14.43% (±150.46%) in the placebo group (p = 0.007). A decrease in BML volume was observed in 76.5% of patients receiving ZOL and in 50% of the patients receiving placebo. Pain level (visual analogue scale [VAS]) and all categories of the pain disability index (PDI) improved with ZOL versus placebo after 6 weeks but reconciled after 6 additional weeks of follow-up. Six serious adverse events occurred in 5 patients, none of which were classified as related to the study drug. No cases of osteonecrosis or fractures occurred. Therefore, single-dose zoledronic acid 5 mg iv together with vitamin D may enhance resolution of bone marrow lesions over 6 weeks along with reduction of pain compared with vitamin D supplementation only. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Alendronate use in older patients with reduced renal function: challenges and opportunities in clinical practice.

In this retrospective cohort study, alendronate use among older osteoporosis patients (age>65 years) with reduced renal function (creatinine clearance<35ml/min) was not associated with significant deterioration in renal function from baseline nor increased incidence of osteoporotic fractures or acute kidney injury, compared with patients conservatively managed with only calcium/vitamin D supplementation. INTRODUCTION: Oral bisphosphonates are not recommended in patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) <35ml/min, although this is not supported by post hoc analyses of pivotal oral bisphosphonate studies. As both osteoporosis and renal insufficiency are more prevalent with advancing age, it is important to determine the safety and efficacy of oral bisphosphonates among these patients. METHODS: Patients with CrCl <35ml/min on alendronate (group A, n=98), with CrCl <35ml/min conservatively managed (group B, n=96), and with CrCl ≥35ml/min on alendronate (group C, n=96) were followed up to 22 months. Primary outcomes were mean change in CrCl from baseline in group A compared with groups B and C, respectively. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of osteoporotic fractures and adverse events between groups. RESULTS: There was no significant change in CrCl from baseline when comparing group A (-1.53±6.83ml/min) with group B (0.59±5.17ml/min) (p=0.075), and group A with group C (-3.71±7.54ml/min) (p=0.163). There was no significant increase in incidences of osteoporotic fractures in group A compared with group B (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 2.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-6.37) and group A compared with group C (aRR 1.15, 95% CI 0.46-2.89). There was no significant difference in incidences of acute kidney injury (AKI) in group A compared with group B (aRR 0.48, 95% CI 0.20-1.12). Although statistically non-significant, there was an increase in AKI incidence in group A compared with group C (RR 7.84, 95% CI 0.98-62.66). CONCLUSION: Among patients with CrCl <35ml/min, alendronate therapy was not associated with significant deterioration in renal function from baseline. Although not powered for secondary outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences in osteoporotic fracture or AKI incidence between the groups.

Bisphosphonates and management of kidney stones and bone disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Kidney stones are strongly associated with low bone density and bone fracture. Clinical management focuses on prevention of kidney stones and bone fracture. We reviewed literature of kidney stones and bone disease with a special focus on updates in therapeutic strategies. We will review the literature regarding dietary management, supplements, and medications and emphasize the recent studies on bisphosphonates and kidney stone management. RECENT FINDINGS: Bisphosphonate medications are commonly used in management of low bone density. Previous studies showed that they reduce urinary calcium. A recent large prospective study found that bisphosphonates may reduce the risk of kidney stones in individuals who have low bone density. In addition to lowering urinary calcium, a recent study found that bisphosphonates may act as an inhibitor in the urinary space. SUMMARY: There are multiple dietary and pharmacologic strategies that can be considered for kidney stones and bone disease, such as low salt and normal calcium diet, as well as thiazides, alkali, and bisphosphonate medications. Bisphosphonates may have an important role in reducing bone resorption and reducing overall risk of kidney stone and bone disease.