Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 56
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
4.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 21(6): 420-427, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32332379

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing (TTCP) is a standard procedure in current practice, despite limited coverage in consensus guidelines. However, many authors reported several complications associated with TTCP, especially development of infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). The aim of this survey was to provide a country-wide picture of current practice regarding TTCP. METHODS: Data were collected using an online survey that was administered to members of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing. RESULTS: We collected data from 102 physicians, working in 81 Italian hospitals from 17/21 regions. Our data evidenced that different strategies are adopted in case of acute bradycardia with a tendency to limit TTCP mainly to advanced atrioventricular block. However, some centers reported a greater use in elective procedures. TTCP is usually performed by electrophysiologists or interventional cardiologists and, differently from previous reports, mainly by a femoral approach and with nonfloating catheters. We found high inhomogeneity regarding prevention of infections and thromboembolic complications and in post-TTCP management, associated with different TTCP volumes and a strategy for management of acute bradyarrhythmias. CONCLUSION: This survey evidenced a high inhomogeneity in the approaches adopted by Italian cardiologists for TTCP. Further studies are needed to explore if these divergences are associated with different long-term outcomes, especially incidence of CIED-related infections.


Asunto(s)
Bradicardia/terapia , Electrofisiología Cardíaca/tendencias , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/tendencias , Cardiólogos/tendencias , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas/tendencias , Marcapaso Artificial/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Bradicardia/diagnóstico , Bradicardia/fisiopatología , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Italia
5.
PLoS Med ; 17(3): e1003044, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32155145

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Globally, few studies compare progress toward the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) Fast-Track targets among migrant populations. Fast-Track targets are aligned to the HIV diagnosis and care cascade and entail achieving 90-90-90 (90% of people living with HIV [PLHIV] diagnosed, 90% of those diagnosed on treatment, and 90% of those on treatment with viral suppression [VS]) by 2020 and 95-95-95 by 2030. We compared cascades between migrant and nonmigrant populations in Australia. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a serial cross-sectional survey for HIV diagnosis and care cascades using modelling estimates for proportions diagnosed combined with a clinical database for proportions on treatment and VS between 2013-2017. We estimated the number of PLHIV and number diagnosed using New South Wales (NSW) and Victorian (VIC) data from the Australian National HIV Registry. Cascades were stratified by migration status, sex, HIV exposure, and eligibility for subsidised healthcare in Australia (reciprocal healthcare agreement [RHCA]). We found that in 2017, 17,760 PLHIV were estimated in NSW and VIC, and 90% of them were males. In total, 90% of estimated PLHIV were diagnosed. Of the 9,391 who were diagnosed and retained in care, most (85%; n = 8,015) were males. We excluded 38% of PLHIV with missing data for country of birth, and 41% (n = 2,408) of eligible retained PLHIV were migrants. Most migrants were from Southeast Asia (SEA; 28%), northern Europe (12%), and eastern Asia (11%). Most of the migrants and nonmigrants were males (72% and 83%, respectively). We found that among those retained in care, 90% were on antiretroviral therapy (ART), and 95% of those on ART had VS (i.e., 90-90-95). Migrants had larger gaps in their HIV diagnosis and care cascade (85-85-93) compared with nonmigrants (94-90-96). Similarly, there were larger gaps among migrants reporting male-to-male HIV exposure (84-83-93) compared with nonmigrants reporting male-to-male HIV exposure (96-92-96). Large gaps were also found among migrants from SEA (72-87-93) and sub-Saharan Africa (SSA; 89-93-91). Migrants from countries ineligible for RHCA had lower cascade estimates (83-85-92) than RHCA-eligible migrants (96-86-95). Trends in the HIV diagnosis and care cascades improved over time (2013 and 2017). However, there was no significant increase in ART coverage among migrant females (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 1.03; 95% CI 0.99-1.08; p = 0.154), nonmigrant females (IRR: 1.01; 95% CI 0.95-1.07; p = 0.71), and migrants from SEA (IRR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.99-1.07; p = 0.06) and SSA (IRR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.99-1.08; p = 0.11). Additionally, there was no significant increase in VS among migrants reporting male-to-male HIV exposure (IRR: 1.02; 95% CI 0.99-1.04; p = 0.08). The major limitation of our study was a high proportion of individuals missing data for country of birth, thereby limiting migrant status categorisation. Additionally, we used a cross-sectional instead of a longitudinal study design to develop the cascades and used the number retained as opposed to using all individuals diagnosed to calculate the proportions on ART. CONCLUSIONS: HIV diagnosis and care cascades improved overall between 2013 and 2017 in NSW and VIC. Cascades for migrants had larger gaps compared with nonmigrants, particularly among key migrant populations. Tracking subpopulation cascades enables gaps to be identified and addressed early to facilitate achievement of Fast-Track targets.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Vías Clínicas/tendencias , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes , Emigración e Inmigración/tendencias , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Brechas de la Práctica Profesional/tendencias , Australia/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/etnología , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Teóricos , Brechas de la Práctica Profesional/etnología , Retención en el Cuidado/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo
6.
Anesth Analg ; 131(1): 255-262, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31569162

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic disparities in health care are well documented in the United States, although evidence of disparities in pediatric anesthesia is limited. We sought to determine whether there is an association between race and ethnicity and the use of intraoperative regional anesthesia at a single academic children's hospital. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all anesthetics at an academic tertiary children's hospital between May 4, 2014, and May 31, 2018. The primary outcome was delivery of regional anesthesia, defined as a neuraxial or peripheral nerve block. The association between patient race and ethnicity (white non-Hispanic or minority) and receipt of regional anesthesia was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Sensitivity analyses were performed comparing white non-Hispanic to an expansion of the single minority group to individual racial and ethnic groups and on patients undergoing surgeries most likely to receive regional anesthesia (orthopedic and urology patients). RESULTS: Of 33,713 patient cases eligible for inclusion, 25,664 met criteria for analysis. Three-thousand one-hundred eighty-nine patients (12.4%) received regional anesthesia. One thousand eighty-six of 8884 (13.3%) white non-Hispanic patients and 2003 of 16,780 (11.9%) minority patients received regional anesthesia. After multivariable adjustment for confounding, race and ethnicity were not found to be significantly associated with receiving intraoperative regional anesthesia (adjusted odds ratios [ORs] = 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.06; P = .36). Sensitivity analyses did not find significant differences between the white non-Hispanic group and individual races and ethnicities, nor did they find significant differences when analyzing only orthopedic and urology patients, despite observing some meaningful clinical differences. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of patients undergoing surgical anesthesia at a single academic children's hospital, race and ethnicity were not significantly associated with the adjusted ORs of receiving intraoperative regional anesthesia. This finding contrasts with much of the existing health care disparities literature and warrants further study with additional datasets to understand the mechanisms involved.


Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos , Anestesia Local/métodos , Atención a la Salud/etnología , Etnicidad , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Grupos Raciales/etnología , Centros Médicos Académicos/tendencias , Adolescente , Anestesia Local/tendencias , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 20(9): 597-605, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31318839

RESUMEN

METHODS: We performed a nationwide survey on the current practice of ventricular tachycardia catheter ablation in Italy during the year 2016. RESULTS: Among 145 operators participating in the survey, 58 (40.0%) did not perform any ventricular tachycardia ablation in 2016. Among those performing ventricular tachycardia ablation, 9 operators (6.2%) performed only right ventricular endocardial catheter ablation, 52 (35.9%) performed endocardial catheter ablation both in the right and left ventricle (LV) and 26 (17.9%) performed both endocardial and epicardial LV catheter ablations. Seventy operators (89.7%) among the 78 performing LV and epicardial ablations treated patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy; ablations in the setting of other causes were less frequently performed. The following were considered as minimum requirements for ventricular tachycardia ablation: presence of a three-dimensional mapping system (120 operators, 82.8%), ICU in the hospital (118 operators, 81.4%), operator's training in high volume centers (93 operators, 64.1%). Twenty-eight operators (19.3%) performed catheter ablation in patients with electrical storm only after hemodynamic stabilization, 41 operators (28.3%) also during the acute phase and 9 operators (6.2%) never performed catheter ablation in electrical storm patients; the remaining 67 operators did not perform ventricular tachycardia ablation at all, or performed ablations only in the right ventricle. CONCLUSION: The present survey provides a snapshot of the current invasive treatment of ventricular tachycardia by catheter ablation. The procedure, especially in the setting of ischemic cardiomyopathy, is performed nationwide. Complex cases, including those with electrical storm, should be managed within a preestablished integrated network of regional referral centers able to transfer patients as soon as possible.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter/tendencias , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Taquicardia Ventricular/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Transferencia de Pacientes/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Regionalización/tendencias , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Ventricular/epidemiología , Taquicardia Ventricular/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
PLoS Med ; 16(7): e1002860, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31335869

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Indian government supports both public- and private-sector provision of hospital care for neonates: neonatal intensive care is offered in public facilities alongside a rising number of private-for-profit providers. However, there are few published reports about mortality levels and care practices in these facilities. We aimed to assess care practices, causes of admission, and outcomes from neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in public secondary and private tertiary hospitals and both public and private medical colleges enrolled in a quality improvement collaborative in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh-2 Indian states with a respective population of 35 and 50 million. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a cross-sectional study between 30 May and 26 August 2016 as part of a baseline evaluation in 52 consenting hospitals (26 public secondary hospitals, 5 public medical colleges, 15 private tertiary hospitals, and 6 private medical colleges) offering neonatal intensive care. We assessed the availability of staff and services, adherence to evidence-based practices at admission, and case fatality after admission to the NICU using a range of tools, including facility assessment, observations of admission, and abstraction of registers and telephone interviews after discharge. Our analysis is adjusted for clustering and weighted for caseload at the hospital level and presents findings stratified by type and ownership of hospitals. In total, the NICUs included just over 3,000 admissions per month. Staffing and infrastructure provision were largely according to government guidelines, except that only a mean of 1 but not the recommended 4 paediatricians were working in public secondary NICUs per 10 beds. On admission, all neonates admitted to private hospitals had auscultation (100%, 19 of 19 observations) but only 42% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25%-62%, p-value for difference is 0.361) in public secondary hospitals. The most common single cause of admission was preterm birth (25%) followed by jaundice (23%). Case-fatality rates at age 28 days after admission to a NICU were 4% (95% CI 2%-8%), 15% (9%-24%), 4% (2%-8%) and 2% (1%-5%) (Chi-squared p = 0.001) in public secondary hospitals, public medical colleges, private tertiary hospitals, and private medical colleges, respectively, according to facility registers. Case fatality according to postdischarge telephone interviews found rates of 12% (95% CI 7%-18%) for public secondary hospitals. Roughly 6% of admitted neonates were referred to another facility. Outcome data were missing for 27% and 8% of admissions to private tertiary hospitals and private medical colleges. Our study faced the limitation of missing data due to incomplete documentation. Further generalizability was limited due to the small sample size among private facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest differences in quality of neonatal intensive care and 28-day survival between the different types of hospitals, although comparison of outcomes is complicated by differences in the case mix and referral practices between hospitals. Uniform reporting of outcomes and risk factors across the private and public sectors is required to assess the benefits for the population of mixed-care provision.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitales Privados/tendencias , Hospitales Públicos/tendencias , Mortalidad Infantil/tendencias , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/tendencias , Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/tendencias , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/tendencias , Estudios Transversales , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , India , Lactante , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Admisión y Programación de Personal/tendencias , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 28(4): 980-987, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30630752

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Stroke care in the US is increasingly regionalized. Many patients undergo interhospital transfer to access specialized, time-sensitive interventions such as mechanical thrombectomy. METHODS: Using a stratified survey design of the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2009-2014) we examined trends in interhospital transfers for ischemic stroke resulting in mechanical thrombectomy. International Classification of Disease-Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes were used to identify stroke admissions and inpatient procedures within endovascular-capable hospitals. Regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with patient outcomes. RESULTS: From 2009-2014, 772,437 ischemic stroke admissions were identified. Stroke admissions that arrived via interhospital transfer increased from 12.5% to 16.8%, 2009-2014 (P-trend < .001). Transfers receiving thrombectomy increased from 4.0% to 5.2%, 2009-2014 (P-trend = .016), while those receiving tissue plasminogen activator increased from 16.0% to 20.0%, 2009-2014 (P-trend < .001). One in 4 patients receiving thrombectomy were transferred from another acute care facility (n = 6,014 of 24,861). Compared to patients arriving via the hospital "front door" receiving mechanical thrombectomy, those arriving via transfer were more often from rural areas and received by teaching hospitals with greater frequency of thrombectomy. Those arriving via interhospital transfer undergoing thrombectomy had greater odds of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.19, 95% CI: 1.01-1.42) versus "front door" arrivals. There were no differences in inpatient mortality (AOR 1.11, 95% CI: .93-1.33). CONCLUSIONS: From 2009 to 2014, interhospital stroke transfers to endovascular-capable hospitals increased by one-third. For every ∼15 additional transfers over the time period one additional patient received thrombectomy. Optimization of transfers presents an opportunity to increase access to thrombectomy.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Procedimientos Endovasculares/tendencias , Pacientes Internos , Transferencia de Pacientes/tendencias , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Trombectomía/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Trombectomía/efectos adversos , Trombectomía/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
10.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 192: 371-376, 2018 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30122319

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Among patients prescribed long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for chronic pain, no study has yet examined how clinicians respond to evidence of illicit drug use and whether the decision to discontinue opioids is influenced by a patient's race. METHODS: Among outpatients of black and white race initiating LTOT through the VA between 2000 and 2010, we reviewed electronic medical records to determine whether opioids were discontinued within 60 days of a positive urine drug test. Logistic regression was used to examine differences by race. RESULTS: Among 15,366 patients of black (48.1%) or white (51.9%) race initiating LTOT from 2000 to 2010, 20.5% (25.5% of blacks vs. 15.8% of whites, P <. 001) received a urine drug test within the first 6 months of treatment; 13.8% tested positive for cannabis and 17.4% for cocaine. LTOT was discontinued in 11.4% of patients who tested positive for cannabis and in 13.1% of those who tested positive for cocaine. Among patients testing positive for cannabis, blacks were 2.1 times more likely than whites to have LTOT discontinued (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-4.08). Among patients testing positive for cocaine, blacks were 3.3 times more likely than whites to have LTOT discontinued (AOR 3.30, CI 1.28-8.53). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients testing positive for illicit drug use while receiving LTOT, clinicians are substantially more likely to discontinue opioids when the patient is black. A more universal approach to administering and responding to urine drug testing is urgently needed.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Población Negra/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Drogas Ilícitas/efectos adversos , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias , Población Blanca/etnología , Adulto , Anciano , Población Negra/psicología , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/etnología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/tendencias , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Drogas Ilícitas/orina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias/tendencias , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/etnología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Población Blanca/psicología
12.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 6(9)2017 Sep 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28899894

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about facility-level variation in the use of revascularization procedures for the management of stable obstructive coronary artery disease. Furthermore, it is unknown if variation in the use of coronary revascularization is associated with use of other cardiovascular procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated all elective coronary angiograms performed in the Veterans Affairs system between September 1, 2007, and December 31, 2011, using the Clinical Assessment and Reporting Tool and identified patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Patients were considered managed with revascularization if they received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting within 30 days of diagnosis. We calculated risk-adjusted facility-level rates of overall revascularization, PCI, and coronary artery bypass grafting. In addition, we determined the association between facility-level rates of revascularization and post-PCI stress testing. Among 15 650 patients at 51 Veterans Affairs sites who met inclusion criteria, the median rate of revascularization was 59.6% (interquartile range, 55.7%-66.7%). Across all facilities, risk-adjusted rates of overall revascularization varied from 41.5% to 88.1%, rate of PCI varied from 23.2% to 80.6%, and rate of coronary artery bypass graftingvariedfrom 7.5% to 36.5%. Of 6179 patients who underwent elective PCI, the median rate of stress testing in the 2 years after PCI was 33.7% (interquartile range, 30.7%-47.1%). There was no evidence of correlation between facility-level rate of revascularization and follow-up stress testing. CONCLUSIONS: Within the Veterans Affairs system, we observed large facility-level variation in rates of revascularization for obstructive coronary artery disease, with variation driven primarily by PCI. There was no association between facility-level use of revascularization and follow-up stress testing, suggesting use rates are specific to a particular procedure and not a marker of overall facility-level use.


Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria/tendencias , Estenosis Coronaria/terapia , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/tendencias , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria/tendencias , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía de Estrés/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación
13.
Transplantation ; 101(9): 2048-2055, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28945663

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To reduce the geographic heterogeneity in liver transplant allocation, the United Network of Organ Sharing has proposed redistricting, which is impacted by both donor supply and liver transplantation demand. We aimed to determine the impact of demographic changes on the redistricting proposal and characterize causes behind geographic heterogeneity in donor supply. METHODS: We analyzed adult donors from 2002 to 2014 from the United Network of Organ Sharing database and calculated regional liver donation and utilization stratified by age, race, and body mass index. We used US population data to make regional projections of available donors from 2016 to 2025, incorporating the proposed 8-region redistricting plan. We used donors/100 000 population age 18 to 84 years (D/100K) as a measure of equity. We calculated a coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) for each regional model. We performed an exploratory analysis where we used national rates of donation, utilization and both for each regional model. RESULTS: The overall projected D/100K will decrease from 2.53 to 2.49 from 2016 to 2025. The coefficient of variation in 2016 is expected to be 20.3% in the 11-region model and 13.2% in the 8-region model. We found that standardizing regional donation and utilization rates would reduce geographic heterogeneity to 4.9% in the 8-region model and 4.6% in the 11-region model. CONCLUSIONS: The 8-region allocation model will reduce geographic variation in donor supply to a significant extent; however, we project that geographic disparity will marginally increase over time. Though challenging, interventions to better standardize donation and utilization rates would be impactful in reducing geographic heterogeneity in organ supply.


Asunto(s)
Áreas de Influencia de Salud , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Trasplante de Hígado/tendencias , Evaluación de Necesidades/tendencias , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/tendencias , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Censos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Predicción , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Regionalización/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
15.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis ; 12: 1753-1763, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28670116

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap syndrome (ACOS) is an increasingly recognized phenotype. Few randomized clinical trials have been conducted in patients with ACOS; therefore, scientific evidence concerning ACOS is scarce and a therapeutic approach remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate current treatment trends for patients with ACOS, identified as those with a dual definition of asthma and COPD, in a real-world COPD cohort. METHODS: Data were analyzed from patients with asthma and COPD in the USA, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK who participated in the 2012 and 2013 Adelphi Respiratory Disease Specific Programmes (DSPs). Patients with ACOS were identified in the COPD population; these patients had a physician-confirmed, concomitant asthma diagnosis. Physicians completed a patient record form providing information on patient and disease characteristics including prescribed respiratory treatment. Pairwise comparisons were made between the ACOS, asthma, and COPD populations using χ2 tests. RESULTS: In total, 9,042 patients with asthma-only, 7,119 patients with COPD-only, and 523 patients with ACOS (a dual diagnosis of asthma and COPD) participated in the study. The most commonly prescribed regimens were inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ß2-agonist (ICS/LABA) + long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA); (ACOS 30%, asthma 1.4%, and COPD 32%), ICS/LABA (19%, 41.5%, and 17%, respectively), and LAMA (6%, 0.4%, and 19%, respectively); 18% of patients with ACOS were not prescribed an ICS. Patients with ACOS had a significantly higher incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, diabetes, and obesity and experienced more exacerbations in the past year than those with COPD or asthma. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with ACOS, as defined in this research, were prescribed similar treatment to those with COPD. There is a need, however, for better treatment for patients with ACOS, as indicated by symptoms and exacerbation levels. A clearer therapeutic approach for patients with ACOS is required.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración por Inhalación , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiasmáticos/efectos adversos , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/fisiopatología , Broncodilatadores/efectos adversos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Síndrome , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 8(5): 374-386, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28642040

RESUMEN

The aging of the population is a global challenge. The number of older adults is rapidly growing, leading to an increase in the prevalence of noncommunicable diseases associated with aging, such as cancer. Worldwide, older adults account for approximately half of all cancer cases, and this proportion is projected to increase globally. Furthermore, the majority of older adults live in less developed regions, where health systems are generally ill-equipped to provide care for complex chronic conditions. Worldwide, there is paucity of geriatric training, and most of the oncology workforce lacks the skills and knowledge to provide comprehensive care for older patients. Various initiatives aimed at providing adequate clinical care for older adults, increasing the geriatric skills and knowledge of healthcare professionals, and developing geriatric oncology research, have been successfully implemented. However, most developments in geriatric oncology have taken place in high-income countries, and there are still large inequalities in the availability of clinical, educational, and research initiatives across different regions of the world. This article provides an overview of geriatric oncology initiatives in Asia, Europe, Australia and New Zealand, Latin America, and the United States and Canada. Understanding the achievements and challenges of geriatric oncology around the world, and fostering international collaboration in research and training are essential for improving the care of all older adults with cancer.


Asunto(s)
Geriatría/tendencias , Oncología Médica/tendencias , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Investigación Biomédica/tendencias , Medicina Clínica/tendencias , Geriatría/educación , Salud Global/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Oncología Médica/educación , Mortalidad/tendencias
17.
Rheumatol Int ; 37(9): 1453-1459, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28551723

RESUMEN

The objective of this study is to describe the composition of multidisciplinary teams (MDT) working within rheumatology departments across the UK. All rheumatology departments in the United Kingdom (UK) were invited to participate in a national electronic survey between February 2014 and April 2015 as a part of a national audit for the management of rheumatoid and early inflammatory arthritis commissioned by Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership. Rheumatology departments were asked to report their MDT composition; defined as a rheumatologist (consultant or specialist trainee), specialist nurse, occupational therapist physiotherapist, and podiatrist. The data were collected as Whole Time Equivalent (WTE) of each professional group at each department adjusted to 100,000 population. The data were grouped according to British Society for Rheumatology regions to study regional variations. The survey was completed by 164/167 departments (98% response rate). All departments reported an MDT comprising a rheumatologist (consultant or specialist trainee) and almost all included a specialist nurse but only 28 (17%) of the departments had MDTs comprising all the professional groups. There was a high degree of regional variation in the provision of Allied Health Professionals (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and podiatrists) in the UK. MDT care is recommended for the management of inflammatory arthritis, but few UK rheumatology departments have a full complement of healthcare professionals within their MDT. There is a high degree of regional variation in the composition and staffing levels of the rheumatology MDT across the UK; the impact of which warrants further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Departamentos de Hospitales/tendencias , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Enfermedades Reumáticas/terapia , Reumatología/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Auditoría Médica , Enfermeras Especialistas/tendencias , Terapeutas Ocupacionales/tendencias , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Podiatría/tendencias , Enfermedades Reumáticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/fisiopatología , Reumatólogos/educación , Reumatólogos/tendencias , Reino Unido , Recursos Humanos
18.
BMJ Open ; 7(2): e011663, 2017 02 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28174219

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To achieve universal coverage of reproductive healthcare and drastic reduction in maternal mortality, adequate attention and resources should be given to young women. This study therefore aimed to examine the inequality trends in the use of antenatal care (ANC) services and skilled birth attendance (SBA) within a subgroup of Ghanaian women aged 15-24 years between 2003 and 2014. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study that used data from the Ghana Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) 2003, 2008 and 2014. We applied regression-based total attributable fraction (TAF) as an index for measuring multiple dimensions of inequality in the use of ANC and SBA. SETTING: Ghana. PARTICIPANTS: Young women aged 15-24 years with at least one previous birth experience in the past 5 years prior to the surveys. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ANC visits and skilled attendance at birth. RESULTS: Urbanicity-related, education-related and wealth-related inequality in non-use of SBA declined between 2003 and 2008, but increased between 2008 and 2014. A consistent decline was observed in urbanicity-related inequality in non-use of four or more ANC visits from 2003 through 2008 to 2014. A similar reduction was observed for education-related inequality in relation to the same outcome. In contrast, wealth-related inequality in ANC usage increased over time. CONCLUSIONS: The rise in urbanicity-related, education-related and wealth-related inequality in the usage of SBA between 2008 and 2014 threatens the sustainability of the general progress made in the usage of maternal health services in Ghana within the same period.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Servicios de Salud Materna/tendencias , Partería/tendencias , Atención Prenatal/tendencias , Adolescente , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Ghana , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28096206

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A key to reduce and eradicate racial disparities in hypertension outcomes is to understand their causes. We aimed at evaluating racial differences in antihypertensive drug utilization patterns and blood pressure control by insurance status, age, sex, and presence of comorbidities. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 8796 hypertensive individuals ≥18 years of age were identified from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2003-2012) in a repeated cross-sectional study. During the study period, all 3 racial groups (whites, blacks, and Hispanics) experienced substantial increase in hypertension treatment and control. The overall treatment rates were 73.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.6%-76.2%), 70.8% (95% CI, 68.6%-73.0%), and 60.7% (95% CI, 57.0%-64.3%) and hypertension control rates were 42.9% (95% CI, 40.5%-45.2%), 36.9% (95% CI, 34.7%-39.2%), and 31.2% (95% CI, 28.6%-33.9%) for whites, blacks, and Hispanics, respectively. When stratified by insurance status, blacks (odds ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.64-0.86] for insured and 0.59 [95% CI, 0.36-0.94] for uninsured) and Hispanics (odds ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.60-0.91] for insured and 0.58 [95% CI, 0.36-0.94] for uninsured) persistently had lower rates of hypertension control compared with whites. Racial disparities also persisted in subgroups stratified by age (≥60 and <60 years of age) and presence of comorbidities but worsened among patients <60 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Black and Hispanic patients had poorer hypertension control compared with whites, and these differences were more pronounced in younger and uninsured patients. Although black patients received more intensive antihypertensive therapy, Hispanics were undertreated. Future studies should further explore all aspects of these disparities to improve cardiovascular outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Negro o Afroamericano , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Hispánicos o Latinos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/etnología , Población Blanca , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios Transversales , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Modelos Lineales , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pacientes no Asegurados/etnología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas Nutricionales , Oportunidad Relativa , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
20.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 35(3): 477-483, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28134086

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To explore patterns of real-world early RA (ERA) care across countries. METHODS: An online survey was disseminated to practising rheumatologists across Europe and the US, also made accessible on social media between April and May 2015. Survey questions (n=38) assessed the structure and setting of ERA clinics, times to diagnosis and treatment, patient monitoring, guideline use and data recording. RESULTS: A total of 212 rheumatologists from 39 countries (76% European) completed the survey. 62% had an ERA clinic based at a university hospital. Patient referral to rheumatology was mainly (78%) via primary care; 44% had an agreed ERA local referral pathway, 15% a national pathway. Only 16% had dedicated ERA clinics, the majority being practitioners in Northern Europe with access to a local or national referral pathway. Data for research were collected by 42%. Treatment guidelines were followed by the majority, especially rheumatologists practising in Europe. Variations existed in the use of initial DMARDs with treatment decisions reported to be influenced by international/national guidelines in 71%/61%. No significant relationship between country gross national income and the availability of ERA clinics was seen. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides comparative benchmark information regarding the global provision of ERA care. Substantial variations exist in referral and early assessment pathways with guidelines having a most apparent impact in Northern Europe. Provision of an ERA service does not appear to be constrained by cost, with conceptual factors, e.g. clinician engagement, perhaps playing a role. These initial insights could potentially help harmonise ERA management across countries.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Reumatólogos/tendencias , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Vías Clínicas/tendencias , Estudios Transversales , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Adhesión a Directriz , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA