Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 58
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 196: 104277, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492760

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer can expect to receive numerous invasive vascular access procedures for intravenous therapy and clinical diagnostics. Due to the increased incidence and prevalence of cancer globally there will be significantly more people who require first-line intravenous chemotherapy over the next ten years. METHODS: Our objective was to determine the types of evidence that exist for the vascular access device (VAD) type for the delivery of systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) in cancer patients. We used JBI scoping review methodology to identify the types of VADs used for SACT and with a specific search strategy included articles from 2012-2022 published in the English language. We identify (i) type of VADs used for SACT delivery (ii) the type of insertion and post-insertion complications (iii) the geographical location and clinical environment (iv) and whether VAD choice impacts on quality of life (QOL). Findings were presented using the PAGER framework. MAIN FINDINGS: Our search strategy identified 10,390 titles, of these, 5318 duplicates were removed. The remaining 5072 sources were screened for eligibility, 240 articles met the inclusion criteria. The most common design include retrospective study designs (n = 91) followed by prospective study designs (n = 31). We found 28 interventional studies with 21 registered in a clinical trial registry and identified no core outcome sets papers specific to VAD for SACT. The most prevalent publications were those that featured two or more VAD types (n = 70), followed by tunnelled intravenous VADs (n = 67). Of 38 unique complications identified, the most frequent catheter related complication was catheter related thrombosis (n = 178, 74%), followed by infection (n = 170, 71%). The county where the most publications originated from was China (n = 62) with one randomized controlled multicenter study from a comprehensive cancer centre. Of the thirty three studies that included QOL we found 4 which reported on body image. No QOL measurement tools specific to the process of SACT administration via VAD are available INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest a systematic review and meta-analysis of VAD use for intravenous SACT can be considered. However, the development of a core outcome set for SACT should be prioritised. Funding for high quality programs of research for VAD in cancer are needed. Comprehensive cancer centres should lead this research agenda.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto
2.
J Vasc Access ; 24(3): 465-474, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34396816

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The recurrent arteriovenous fistula (AVF) intervention in the treatment of hemodialysis induces pain in patients. Lavender oil has analgesic, antimicrobial, and calming effects. This oil is widely used in patients to reduce anxiety and stress associated with pain caused by analgesics. METHOD: The present study is a randomized controlled and experimental clinical trial in which patients (n = 90) who underwent hemodialysis with AVFs were randomly divided into three groups. The intensity of pain was measured in all patients at three different stages during the insertion of arterial needles for hemodialysis: (1) The topical application of 100% lavender essential oil, (2) the inhaler application of 100% lavender essential oil, and (3) no intervention. The placebo (water) was applied to groups 1 and 2. RESULTS: Our findings revealed that the mean pre-application pain scores in hemodialysis patients were 57.58 ± 20.28 in the working group, 48.53 ± 20.23 in the control group, 19.49 ± 15.66 in the post-application group, and 45.33 ± 25.52 in the control group (p < 0.005). The average pain scores after the application of lavender oil were 22.66 ± 15.35 in the inhaler lavender group, 16.33 ± 15.97 in the topical lavender group, and 45.33 ± 25.52 in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: After inhaler and topical application of lavender oil, a significant decrease in the severity of pain was recorded for patients at the time of arterial insertion of needles.


Asunto(s)
Fístula Arteriovenosa , Cateterismo , Aceites Volátiles , Dolor , Aceites de Plantas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Administración Tópica , Aromaterapia , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Lavandula/química , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Aceites Volátiles/administración & dosificación , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Aceites de Plantas/administración & dosificación , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Escala Visual Analógica , Turquía
3.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 65(11): e0116821, 2021 10 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34460301

RESUMEN

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections of surgically implanted subcutaneous vascular catheters (SISVCs) cause serious morbidity in patients with chronic illnesses. Previous in vitro and murine models demonstrated the synergistic interaction of equimolar concentrations of meropenem/piperacillin/tazobactam (MPT) (VIO-001) against MRSA infection. We investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of VIO-001 for the treatment of MRSA bacteremia in immunocompetent rabbits with SISVCs. In PK studies, we determined that optimal dosing to achieve a time above 4× MIC (T>4×MIC) of a duration of 3 to 3.30 h required a 1-h infusion with every-4-h (Q4h) dosing. Study groups in efficacy experiments consisted of MPT combinations of 100/150/100 mg/kg of body weight (MPT100), 200/300/200 mg/kg (MPT200), and 400/600/400 mg/kg (MPT400); vancomycin (VAN) at 15 mg/kg; and untreated controls (UC). The inoculum of MRSA isolate USA300-TCH1516 (1 × 103 organisms) was administered via the SISCV on day 1 and locked for 24 h. The 8-day therapy started at 24 h postinoculation. There was a significant reduction of MRSA in blood cultures from the SISVCs in all treatment groups, with full clearance on day 4, versus UCs (P < 0.05). Consistent with the clearance of SISVC-related infection, full eradication of MRSA was achieved in lungs, heart, liver, spleen, and kidneys at the end of the study versus UC (P < 0.01). These results strongly correlated with time-kill data, where MPT in the range of 4/6/4 µg/ml to 32/48/32 µg/ml demonstrated a significant 6-log decrease in the bacterial burden versus UC (P < 0.01). In summary, VIO-001 demonstrated a favorable PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) profile and activity against SISCV MRSA infection, bacteremia, and disseminated infection. This rabbit model provides a new system for understanding new antimicrobial agents against MRSA SISVC-related infection, and these data provide a basis for future clinical investigation.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Bacteriemia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Animales , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Meropenem , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/farmacocinética , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , Conejos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Distribución Tisular
4.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 7: CD002786, 2021 07 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34298589

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: People with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) often require either the formation of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or an interposition prosthetic arteriovenous graft (AVG) for haemodialysis. These access sites should ideally have a long life and a low rate of complications (e.g. thrombosis, infection, stenosis, aneurysm formation and distal limb ischaemia). Although some of the complications may be unavoidable, any adjuvant technique or medical treatment aimed at decreasing complications would be welcome. This is the fourth update of the review first published in 2003. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of adjuvant drug treatment in people with ESRD on haemodialysis via autologous AVFs or prosthetic interposition AVGs. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases and ClinicalTrials.gov trials register to 6 August 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of active drug versus placebo in people with ESRD undergoing haemodialysis via an AVF or prosthetic interposition AVG. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: For this update, two review authors (IM, MFAK) independently selected trials for inclusion, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and assessed the certainty of the evidence according to GRADE. We resolved disagreements by discussion or consultation with another review author (ADS). The primary outcome was the long-term fistula or graft patency rate. Secondary outcomes included duration of hospital stay; complications such as infection, aneurysm formation, stenosis and distal limb ischaemia; and number of related surgical or radiological interventions. MAIN RESULTS: For this update, one additional study was suitable for inclusion, making a total of 13 trials with 2080 participants. Overall the certainty of the evidence was low or moderate due to short follow-up periods, heterogeneity between trials, small sample sizes, and risk of bias due to incomplete reporting. Medical adjuvant treatments used in the included trials were aspirin, ticlopidine, dipyridamole, dipyridamole plus aspirin, warfarin, fish oil, clopidogrel, sulphinpyrazone and glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) patch.  All included studies reported on graft patency by measuring graft thrombosis. There was insufficient evidence to determine if there was a difference in graft patency in studies comparing aspirin versus placebo (odds ratio (OR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 2.25; 3 studies, 175 participants; low-certainty evidence). The meta-analysis for graft patency comparing ticlopidine versus placebo favoured ticlopidine (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.82; 3 studies, 339 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was insufficient evidence to determine if there was a difference in graft patency in studies comparing fish oil versus placebo (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.95; 2 studies, 220 participants; low-certainty evidence); and studies comparing clopidogrel and placebo (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.19; 2 studies, 959 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Similarly, there was insufficient evidence to determine if there was a difference in graft patency comparing the effect of dipyridamole versus placebo (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.94; 1 study, 42 participants, moderate-certainty evidence) and dipyridamole plus aspirin versus placebo (OR 0.64, CI 0.16 to 2.56; 1 study, 41 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); comparing low-intensity warfarin with placebo (OR 1.76, 95% CI 0.78 to 3.99; 1 study, 107 participants; low-certainty evidence); comparing sulphinpyrazone versus placebo (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.03 to 5.98; 1 study, 16 participants; low-certainty evidence) and comparing GTN patch and placebo (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.63 to 2.54; 1 study, 167 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The single trial evaluating warfarin was terminated early because of major bleeding events in the warfarin group. Only two studies published data on the secondary outcome of related interventions (surgical or radiological); there was insufficient evidence to determine if there was a difference in related interventions between placebo and treatment groups. None of the included studies reported on the duration of hospital stay.  Most studies reported complications ranging from mortality to nausea. However, data on complications were limited and reporting varied between studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analyses of three studies for ticlopidine (an antiplatelet treatment), which all used the same dose of treatment but with a short follow-up of only one month, suggest ticlopidine may have a beneficial effect as an adjuvant treatment to increase the patency of AVFs and AVGs in the short term. There was insufficient evidence to determine if there was a difference in graft patency between placebo and other treatments such as aspirin, fish oil, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, dipyridamole plus aspirin, warfarin, sulphinpyrazone and GTN patch. The certainty of the evidence was low to moderate due to short follow-up periods, the small number of studies for each comparison, small sample sizes, heterogeneity between trials and risk of bias due to incomplete reporting. Therefore, it appears reasonable to suggest further prospective studies be undertaken to assess the use of these antiplatelet drugs in renal patients with an AVF or AVG.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/métodos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular/efectos de los fármacos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Aceites de Pescado/uso terapéutico , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/prevención & control , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Ticlopidina/uso terapéutico , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular
5.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 5807, 2021 03 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33707520

RESUMEN

Studies have shown that perioperative music interventions can reduce patients' anxiety levels. However, in small operations like port catheter surgery evidence is sparse. The present single-blinded, randomised controlled two-armed study included 84 female patients undergoing port catheter placement who were randomly assigned to either listening to music during surgery vs. no music intervention. The medical staff was blind to group allocation. On the day of the surgery anxiety and stress levels were evaluated using subjective (STAI questionnaire, visual analogue scales) and objective (vital parameters, salivary cortisol) parameters at different time points (before the surgery, at the end of the surgery and 1 h post-surgery). The music group showed significant reductions of systolic blood pressure (from 136.5 mmHg ± 26.1 to 123.3 mmHg ± 22.0, p = .002) and heart rate (from 75.6 bpm ± 12.3 to 73.1 bpm ± 12.2, p = .035) from beginning of the surgery to skin suture, whereas the control group did not. No significant effects of the music intervention on subjective anxiety measures or salivary cortisol were revealed. In sum, the study demonstrates that a music intervention during port catheter placement positively influences physiological anxiety levels, whereas no effects were revealed for subjective anxiety and salivary cortisol. Thus, music can be considered as a low cost addition in clinical routine in order to reduce patients' heart rate and blood pressure. Future studies are encouraged to further explore the differential effects of intraoperative music interventions on physiological, endocrinological and subjective anxiety levels.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/psicología , Catéteres , Musicoterapia , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Ansiedad/fisiopatología , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estrés Psicológico/fisiopatología
6.
J Vasc Access ; 22(2): 173-177, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32538271

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of a dual-chambered venous access port for extracorporeal apheresis therapy. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of all patients who received a dual-chambered venous access port for apheresis therapy over a 36-month period. Clinical success was defined as successful completion of at least one round of apheresis via the venous access port. Major complications were defined as any event requiring elevation of patient care and/or venous access port removal or repositioning. Minor complications were defined as venous access port issues resolved with clinical intervention. RESULTS: Forty-four patients had a venous access port placed at the time of this study. Patients underwent red cell exchange (n = 33), therapeutic plasma exchange (n = 6) or extracorporeal photopheresis (n = 5). Forty (90%) patients had autoimmune diseases and four (10%) had neoplastic processes. Clinical success was achieved in 42 (95.5%) patients. Average venous access port dwell time was 632 days (range = 42-1191 days). All therapies through the venous access ports were well tolerated and no patients reported pain or discomfort. Major complications were seen in nine (20.5%) patients-the majority (n = 7) of which were due to venous access port malfunction-and resolved with catheter revision. One (2.27%) major complication involved an infected venous access port, and one involved a large hematoma at the venous access port site. Minor complications were seen in eight (18.2%) patients, where simple flushing of the catheter with saline or tissue plasminogen activator resolved the issue. CONCLUSION: The dual-chambered venous access port was successfully used for sustained blood flow in apheresis therapy with a moderate, yet correctable complication rate.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Citaféresis , Eritrocitos , Fotoféresis , Intercambio Plasmático , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Adulto , Anciano , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fotoféresis/efectos adversos , Intercambio Plasmático/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
7.
Neurology ; 95(24): e3420-e3427, 2020 12 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33087497

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that a strategy of prolonged arterial line (AL) and central venous line (CVL) use is associated with reduced neonatal invasive procedures and improved growth of the thalamus in extremely preterm neonates (<28 weeks' gestation). METHODS: Two international cohorts of very preterm neonates (n = 143) with prolonged (≥14 days) or restricted (<14 days) use of AL/CVL were scanned serially with MRI. General linear models were used to determine the association between skin breaks and thalamic volumes, accounting for clinical confounders and site differences. Children were assessed at preschool age on standardized tests of motor and cognitive function. Outcome scores were assessed in relation to neonatal thalamic growth. RESULTS: Prolonged AL/CVL use in neonates (n = 86) was associated with fewer skin breaks (median 34) during the hospital stay compared to restricted AL/CVL use (n = 57, median 91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 60.35-84.89). Neonates with prolonged AL/CVL use with fewer skin breaks had significantly larger thalamic volumes early in life compared to neonates with restricted line use (B = 121.8, p = 0.001, 95% CI 48.48-195.11). Neonatal thalamic growth predicted preschool-age cognitive (B = 0.001, 95% CI 0.0003-0.001, p = 0.002) and motor scores (B = 0.01, 95% CI 0.001-0.10, p = 0.02). Prolonged AL/CVL use was not associated with greater incidence of sepsis or multiple infections. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged AL/CVL use in preterm neonates may provide an unprecedented opportunity to reduce invasive procedures in preterm neonates. Pain reduction in very preterm neonates is associated with optimal thalamic growth and neurodevelopment.


Asunto(s)
Desarrollo Infantil/fisiología , Recien Nacido Extremadamente Prematuro/crecimiento & desarrollo , Dolor/prevención & control , Tálamo/crecimiento & desarrollo , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Tálamo/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Tiempo
8.
West J Emerg Med ; 21(2): 353-358, 2020 Feb 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32191193

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine whether ultrasound-guided arterial cannulation (USGAC) is more successful than traditional radial artery cannulation (AC) as performed by emergency medicine (EM) residents with standard ultrasound training. METHODS: We identified 60 patients age 18 years or older at a tertiary care, urban academic emergency department who required radial AC for either continuous blood pressure monitoring or frequent blood draws. Patients were randomized to receive radial AC via either USGAC or traditional AC. If there were three unsuccessful attempts, patients were crossed over to the alternative technique. All EM residents underwent standardized, general ultrasound training. RESULTS: The USGAC group required fewer attempts as compared to the traditional AC group (mean 1.3 and 2.0, respectively; p<0.001); 29 out of 30 (96%) successful radial arterial lines were placed using USGAC, whereas 14 out of 30 (47%) successful lines were placed using traditional AC (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in length of procedure or complication rate between the two groups. There was no difference in provider experience with respect to USGAC vs traditional AC. CONCLUSION: EM residents were more successful and had fewer cannulation attempts with USGAC when compared to traditional AC after standard, intern-level ultrasound training.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Arteria Radial , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Adulto , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Radial/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular
9.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(12): e19525, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32195955

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To assess the arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) at defined time points during preoxygenation and to compare high-flow heated humidified nasal oxygenation with standard preoxygenation using oxygen insufflation via a facemask for at least 5 minutes, before intubation during induction of general anesthesia. METHODS: This randomized, single-blinded, prospective study will be conducted in patients undergoing head and neck surgery. After standard monitoring, the artery catheter at the radial artery or dorsalis pedis artery will be placed and arterial blood gas analysis (ABGA) for baseline values will be performed simultaneously. Each group will be subjected to 1 of 2 preoxygenation methods (high-flow nasal cannula or simple facemask) for 5 minutes, and ABGA will be performed twice. After confirming intubation, we will start mechanical ventilation and check the vital signs and perform the final ABGA. DISCUSSION: This trial aims to examine the trajectory of PaO2 levels during the whole preoxygenation procedure and after intubation. We hypothesize that preoxygenation with the high-flow nasal cannula will be superior to that with the face mask. STUDY REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry (NCT03896906; ClinicalTrials.gov).


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General/tendencias , Monitoreo de Gas Sanguíneo Transcutáneo/métodos , Cabeza/cirugía , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/tendencias , Cuello/cirugía , Análisis de los Gases de la Sangre , Cánula/normas , Cánula/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Máscaras/normas , Máscaras/estadística & datos numéricos , Ventilación no Invasiva/instrumentación , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Oxígeno/sangre , Estudios Prospectivos , Arteria Radial/cirugía , Respiración Artificial/instrumentación , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/normas
10.
J Invest Surg ; 33(6): 493-504, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30543131

RESUMEN

Vascular access ports (VAPs) are an essential tool for long-term vascular access in preclinical studies and disease modeling in non-human primates (NHPs). We retrospectively reviewed central (inferior vena cava, IVC) and portal VAP implantation with the maintenance at our center from 15 January 2010 to 31 January 2018. In total, 209 VAPs were implanted for long-term drug administration and sampling. Patency was >95% at 6 months and >80% at 1 year for IVC VAPs and >90% at 6 months and >85% at 1 year for portal VAPs. The majority of animals had no complications and access was generally durable with device use ranging up to 7 years. In IVC, VAPs loss of patency occurred in 13% (0.035/100 d), surgical site infection in 2.9% (0.097/100 d), port pocket infection in 2.2% (0.004/100 d), erosion in 2.9%, 0.008/100 d), and mechanical failure in 4.3% (0.012/100 d). In portal, VAPs loss of patency occurred in 11.3% (0.028/100 d) and port pocket infection in 1.4% (0.003/100 d). About 12% of VAPs were removed as a result of complications.This study confirms VAP implant and maintenance is a beneficial and safe practice in NHPs resulting in favorable outcomes. High patency rates and low complication rates are comparable to the clinical setting. In addition to enabling comprehensive data collection, VAPs increase satisfaction and well-being by minimizing interference with daily routines and fostering cooperation. VAP implantation, together with an effective maintenance regimen and co-operative handling, is a reliable and convenient refined method for drug administration and blood sampling.Keywords: Vascular access port; nonhuman primates; refinement; central vascular access; portal vascular access; surgical technique; experimental surgery; animal model.


Asunto(s)
Bienestar del Animal , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/veterinaria , Procedimientos Endovasculares/veterinaria , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/veterinaria , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos , Animales , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Macaca fascicularis , Macaca mulatta , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
11.
Bull Cancer ; 106(11): 959-968, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31623835

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Totally implanted venous access (TIVA) improves the safety and welfare of patients treated with cancer chemotherapy (CCT). We aimed to evaluate patients' perception of TIVA placement, TIVA use, and information on TIVA, and to assess the association between patients' perception and their attitude regarding a potential TIVA re-implantation. METHODS: We conducted a single center cross-sectional survey in a university hospital in Northern France. Patients included were consecutive urologic or digestive cancer inpatients admitted for a CCT cycle via TIVA between April 9th and May 9th 2014. We analyzed patients' satisfaction, experience, and attitude, especially when requiring potential TIVA re-implantation under local anesthesia (LA), using a standardized questionnaire and medical records. We analyzed risk factors for refusing potential TIVA re-implantation under LA using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were interviewed (no refusals), including 57 with a TIVA device placed under LA in our university hospital. Among them, 52/57 (91%) reported satisfactory TIVA placement, but respectively 21/57 (37%) and 18/57 (32%) complained of painful or uncomfortable TIVA placement; 51/57 (89%) were satisfied with care provided during CCT cycles. Risk factors for refusing potential re-implantation under LA were: TIVA placement considered painful (P=0.012) or uncomfortable (P=0.038) and dissatisfaction with care provided during CCT cycles (P=0.028). DISCUSSION: We show that despite good overall satisfaction regarding TIVA, some aspects were less positive and warrant improvement actions. It suggests that these actions could not only improve patients' experience of TIVA use but could also facilitate continuation of treatment in the long term.


Asunto(s)
Actitud , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Neoplasias Urológicas/psicología , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestesia Local , Estudios Transversales , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Análisis de Regresión , Retratamiento/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/psicología , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos
12.
ANZ J Surg ; 89(10): 1256-1260, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31480103

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify potentially modifiable risk factors for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative colonization or infection in critically ill burn patients. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Central (Cochrane). Risk factors including antibiotic use and hospital interventions were summarized in a random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of publication bias was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method and funnel plots. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. We identified several potentially modifiable risk factors and were able to grade their importance based on effect size. Related to prior antibiotic exposure, extended-spectrum cephalosporins (pooled odds ratio (OR) 7.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.77-17.67), carbapenems (pooled OR 6.65, 95% CI 3.49-12.69), anti-pseudomonal penicillins (pooled OR 4.23, 95% CI 1.23-14.61) and aminoglycosides (pooled OR 4.20, 95% CI 2.10-8.39) were most significant. Related to hospital intervention, urinary catheters (pooled OR 11.76, 95% CI 5.03-27.51), arterial catheters (pooled OR 8.99, 95% CI 3.84-21.04), mechanical ventilation (pooled OR 5.49, 95% CI 2.59-11.63), central venous catheters (pooled OR 4.26, 95% CI 1.03-17.59), transfusion or blood product administration (pooled OR 4.19, 95% CI 1.48-11.89) and hydrotherapy (pooled OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.64-6.63) were most significant. CONCLUSION: Prior exposure to extended-spectrum cephalosporins and carbapenems, as well as the use of urinary catheters and arterial catheters pose the greatest threat for infection or colonization with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms in the critically ill burn patient population.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/complicaciones , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Resistencia a Múltiples Medicamentos/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/complicaciones , Aminoglicósidos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Quemaduras/microbiología , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/prevención & control , Humanos , Hidroterapia/efectos adversos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Penicilinas/uso terapéutico , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Catéteres Urinarios/efectos adversos , Catéteres Urinarios/microbiología , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/microbiología
13.
Holist Nurs Pract ; 33(3): 146-154, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30973434

RESUMEN

The study was conducted to evaluate the effect of inhaler aromatherapy on invasive pain, procedure adherence, vital signs, and saturation during port catheter insertion among patients diagnosed with cancer. The study was conducted in a nonrandomized controlled trial. Sixty patients including 30 patients in the intervention group and 30 patients in the control group, who were subjected with the same local anesthetic protocol, were included in the study. Aromatic mixture prepared by diluting orange, chamomile, and lavender oil in 70 mL distilled water was inhaled by the intervention group during the procedure. The data of the study were collected by using questionnaire, vital follow-up form, and visual analog scale. The patients in the intervention and control groups were similar in terms of sociodemographic and disease characteristics (P > .05). It was determined that inhaler aromatherapy applied to patients in the intervention group decreased pain experienced during the procedure and facilitated the procedure adherence (P < .05); however, it did not affect vital signs and saturation (P > .05). It can be recommended to administer inhaler aromatherapy with pharmacological therapies during catheterization procedure since it decreases invasive pain and facilitates the procedure adherence.


Asunto(s)
Aromaterapia/normas , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Cumplimiento y Adherencia al Tratamiento/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Aromaterapia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Neoplasias/psicología , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Escala Visual Analógica , Signos Vitales/efectos de los fármacos
14.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 38(6): 609-613, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30831308

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Hypnosis has been reported to decrease pain and anxiety in surgical context, but data studying its impact on patient experience using a validated scale are scarce. In the present study, we assessed the effect of an audio hypnosis session on patient satisfaction during venous access port implantation under local anaesthesia in adult cancer patients using the EVAN-LR Score. METHODS: After informed consent, patients were randomised to receive either hypnosis or standard care. The hypnosis group listened to a 26 minutes recorded audio hypnosis session through the ongoing implantation procedure. The primary outcome was the result of the EVAN-LR questionnaire, assessing perioperative experience in patients undergoing anaesthesia without loss of consciousness. This score describes a global index and 5 dimensions of experience: comfort, pain attention, information and waiting. It is scaled from 0 to 100 with 100 indicating the best possible level of satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included patient's anxiety, heart rate before and after procedure, procedure duration and several Visual Analogic Scale to match EVAN-LR dimensions. RESULTS: Overall, 148 patients were enrolled in the study. The global index of Evan-LR was significantly higher in the hypnosis session group (78 ± 14) compared to the standard care group (71 ± 17) (P = 0.006). No difference was reported in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: A recorded audio hypnosis session during subcutaneous venous port implantation under local anaesthesia in cancer patients significantly improved patient satisfaction.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/prevención & control , Hipnosis , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Satisfacción del Paciente , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Ansiedad/etiología , Atención , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/psicología , Comodidad del Paciente , Autoinforme
15.
Anesth Analg ; 129(1): e20-e22, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29200074

RESUMEN

We tested whether propofol or Intralipid inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis would promote bacterial growth within an intravenous (IV) injection hub, a site prone to bacterial contamination. In tubes incubated under optimal conditions, S epidermidis exhibited growth in Intralipid, but not in propofol. In contrast, within the IV hub incubated with either propofol or intralipid at room temperature, S epidermidis bacterial numbers declined with time, and virtually no contamination remained after 12 hours. These data suggest that certain IV lines are inhospitable for S epidermidis.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación de Medicamentos , Contaminación de Equipos , Fosfolípidos/análisis , Propofol/análisis , Aceite de Soja/análisis , Staphylococcus epidermidis/crecimiento & desarrollo , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/microbiología , Emulsiones/administración & dosificación , Emulsiones/análisis , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Viabilidad Microbiana , Fosfolípidos/administración & dosificación , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Aceite de Soja/administración & dosificación , Factores de Tiempo
16.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 34(10): 1636-1643, 2019 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30339192

RESUMEN

Life-sustaining haemodialysis requires a durable vascular access (VA) to the circulatory system. The ideal permanent VA must provide longevity for use with minimal complication rate and supply sufficient blood flow to deliver the prescribed dialysis dosage. Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) have been endorsed by many professional societies as the VA of choice. However, the high prevalence of comorbidities, particularly diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease and arterial hypertension in elderly people, usually make VA creation more difficult in the elderly. Many of these patients may have an insufficient vasculature for AVF maturation. Furthermore, many AVFs created prior to the initiation of haemodialysis may never be used due to the competing risk of death before dialysis is required. As such, an arteriovenous graft and, in some cases, a central venous catheter, become a valid alternative form of VA. Consequently, there are multiple decision points that require careful reflection before an AVF is placed in the elderly. The traditional metrics of access patency, failure and infection are now being seen in a broader context that includes procedure burden, quality of life, patient preferences, morbidity, mortality and cost. This article of the European Dialysis (EUDIAL) Working Group of ERA-EDTA critically reviews the current evidence on VA in elderly haemodialysis patients and concludes that a pragmatic patient-centred approach is mandatory, thus considering the possibility that the AVF first approach should not be an absolute.


Asunto(s)
Fístula Arteriovenosa/cirugía , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/métodos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/legislación & jurisprudencia , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular
17.
J Pediatr Surg ; 54(7): 1449-1452, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30415954

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Adolescent patients with chronic conditions rely on permanent venous access for safe treatment and supportive care. Traditionally this is provided by a central venous access device (CVAD) e.g. Hickmann catheter or totally implanted subcutaneous port or also called Port-a-Cath (PaC). We reviewed the patient experience, safety and feasibility of insertion of peripheral inserted implanted subcutaneous port (peripheral PaC). METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent insertion of peripheral PaC under ultrasound guidance at our institution since between 2012-2017 were reviewed to ascertain specific details including duration of insertion and complication rate. Short structured questionnaires were used to assess nursing and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Twenty eight peripheral PaC were inserted at our institution. There were 17 female and 11 male patients aged between 12.3 and 18.7 years (median = 16.1). Six were inserted under local anesthetic (LA) in patients who were not fit for general owing to mediastinal mass or lung disease. At the time of analysis 2 PaCs remained in situ with a median duration of 8 months (range 3-48). Removal of 26 PaCs was under LA in 15 cases and under GA in 11. Complications were observed in 9 cases but only necessitated early removal or replacement in 3 cases (displacement and disconnection) and repositioning in 1 case. Thrombosis was seen in 2 patients who required systemic anticoagulation but had complete resolution. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the use of peripheral PaC is safe. The feedback from patients and nursing staff supports the use of the peripheral PaC. We are exploring additional patient groups that might benefit from this device.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Catéteres de Permanencia , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Adolescente , Anestesia General , Anestesia Local , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Niño , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfacción del Paciente , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Trombosis/etiología , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos
18.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 30(1): 69-73, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30527656

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term results of and patient satisfaction with trapezius ports in breast cancer patients, as an alternative to chest ports. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent trapezius port placement from December 2007 to January 2017. Seventy female patients with breast cancer, with a mean age of 54 ± 9.9 years (range, 29-76 years), were included. Indications for trapezius implantation were bilateral breast surgery or unilateral breast surgery and contralateral breast involvement. Sixty-eight of 70 patients had long-term follow-up. A retrospective, questionnaire-based survey was conducted to assess satisfaction and the trapezius port's effect on the daily life of the patient. RESULTS: All implantations were technically successful. Total catheter service time for 68 patients was 65,952 days (2 patients were lost to follow-up). Mean catheter service time was 969.8 days (range 7-3,458 days; median 570 days; 95% confidence interval, 739-1199; standard deviation, 947.7). No immediate procedural complications occurred. Port complications developed in 4 patients (5.9%); port infection developed in 2 patients (0.03/1,000 days); skin dehiscence developed in 1 patient (0.02/1,000 days); and port malfunction developed in 1 patient (0.02/1,000 days). The overall infection rate was 2.9% (2/68). All patients (n = 44) or a close relative (n = 17) who were interviewed with a phone call reported satisfaction regarding their ports. CONCLUSIONS: Trapezius ports offer a safe and feasible option to patients with breast cancer who need an alternative site to chest ports. It is also associated with high overall patient satisfaction.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Cateterismo/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia , Calidad de Vida , Músculos Superficiales de la Espalda , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Adulto , Anciano , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Cateterismo/métodos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Datos Preliminares , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos
20.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 11: CD011353, 2018 Nov 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30480758

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Maintaining long-term vascular access patency is necessary for high quality haemodialysis (HD) treatment of patients with the terminal and most serious stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) - end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Oral supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids (ω-3FA) may help to prevent blockage of the vascular access by reducing the risk of thrombosis and stenosis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ω-3FA supplementation versus placebo or no treatment for maintaining vascular access patency in ESKD patients undergoing HD. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 23 July 2018 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of omega-3 fatty acids versus placebo that assessed the patency of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG) types of vascular access in ESKD patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We assessed the risk of bias of each eligible study using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and made separate overall risk of bias judgments for the efficacy and safety outcomes. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The primary efficacy outcome was loss of vascular patency and the primary safety outcomes were occurrences of serious adverse events (e.g. death, hospitalisation, cardiovascular events, major bleeding). Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of non-serious adverse events (e.g. minor bleeding, gastrointestinal events and other adverse events). Efficacy effects were reported as risk ratios (RR) and safety effects as risk differences (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Studies were pooled separately by type of vascular access using a random-effects model. MAIN RESULTS: Five studies (833 participants) were included; one was a very small pilot study of 7 participants. All studies compared oral ω-3FA supplements against placebo. Four studies enrolled participants with arteriovenous grafts (AVGs), and the other had participants with arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs). The risk of bias for both efficacy and safety outcomes was unclear for all studies, due mainly to incomplete reporting for allocation concealment and incompleteness of study follow-up.In AVF patients, ω-3FA supplementation probably makes little or no difference to the 12-month risk of patency loss (1 study, 536 participants: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.21; moderate certainty evidence), risk of death (1 study, 567 participants: RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.02; moderate certainty evidence) and risk of hospitalisation (1 study, 567 participants: RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.08; low certainty evidence). There was no information on cardiovascular events and major bleeding.In AVG patients, it is very uncertain whether ω-3FA supplementation reduces the risk of patency loss within 6 months (2 studies, 41 participants: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.36 to 2.28; very low certainty evidence) or 12 months (2 studies, 220 participants: RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.31; very low certainty evidence). ω-3FA supplementation may make little or no difference to the risk of death within 6 to 12 months in AVG patients (4 studies, 261 participants: RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.07; low certainty evidence). It is very uncertain if ω-3FA supplementation increases the risk of hospitalisation (3 studies, 65 participants: RD 0.08, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.28; very low certainty evidence), changes the risk of cardiovascular events (4 studies, 261 participants: RD -0.02, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.07; very low certainty evidence), or increases the risk of major bleeding (3 studies, 65 participants: RD 0.08, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.28; very low certainty evidence) within 6 to 12 months in AVG patients. There may be an increase in the risk of mild gastrointestinal adverse reactions (3 studies, 65 participants: RD 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.43; low certainty evidence) such as a sensation of bloatedness, gas or a fishy aftertaste. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In CKD patients with an AVF, there is moderate certainty that ω-3FA supplementation makes little or no difference to preventing patency loss; and in patients with an AVG, it is very uncertain that ω-3FA supplementation prevents patency loss within 12 months.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/métodos , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3/administración & dosificación , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/prevención & control , Diálisis Renal , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Trombosis/prevención & control , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3/efectos adversos , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/complicaciones , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/epidemiología , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA