RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intense pulsed light (IPL) is used for the treatment and improvement of various skin issues. However, patients often experience local skin burning and pain after IPL treatment. Cooling and analgesic measures are indispensable. AIMS: To investigate the clinical effect of thermal shock therapy on pain relief and reduction of adverse reactions during IPL therapy. PATIENTS/METHODS: A total of 60 female patients with facial photoaging who received IPL therapy were enrolled in the study. As a comparative split-face study, one side of the face was randomly selected as the control side. The other side was given thermal shock therapy before and after the IPL treatment immediately as analgesic side. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the pain degree of the patients. The telephone follow-ups regarding the occurrence of adverse reactions were conducted respectively on the 2nd day, 7th day, and 1 month after treatment. RESULTS: The VAS score and skin temperature of analgesia side was lower than that of control side at different stages of treatment. In terms of adverse reactions, the incidence of transient facial redness on the analgesic side was lower than that on the control side. Two patients showed slight secondary pigmentation on the control side, and the other patients showed no other adverse reactions on both sides. CONCLUSIONS: Thermal shock therapy assisted IPL therapy can reduce skin temperature during treatment, effectively relieve patients' pain, reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions caused by heat injury, and improve patients' comfort level.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento de Luz Pulsada Intensa , Dimensión del Dolor , Humanos , Femenino , Tratamiento de Luz Pulsada Intensa/efectos adversos , Tratamiento de Luz Pulsada Intensa/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Envejecimiento de la Piel/efectos de la radiación , Temperatura Cutánea , Cara , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the procedural pain experienced by neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting and determine the corresponding pain grades. METHODS: Two experienced nurses independently used the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) to evaluate the neonatal pain during procedures taking place in the tertiary NICU and two level-two neonatal care units in the Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The mean and distribution of NIPS pain scores and the corresponding pain grades of participants when experiencing clinical painful procedures were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 957 neonates exposed to 15 common clinical painful procedures were included in the study. The clinical painful procedures experienced by 957 participants could be divided into three groups: severe pain (NIPS score 5-7: peripheral intravenous cannulation, arterial catheterisation, arterial blood sampling, peripherally inserted central catheter placement and nasopharyngeal suctioning), mild to moderate pain (NIPS score 3-4: finger prick, intramuscular injection, adhesive removal, endotracheal intubation suctioning, heel prick, lumbar puncture and subcutaneous injection) and no pain to mild pain (NIPS score 0-2: gastric tube insertion, enema and intravenous injection). CONCLUSIONS: The neonatal pain response to clinical procedures in NICU had certain pattern and preintervention drug analgesia could be taken for painful procedures with clustered high NIPS pain scores. Meanwhile, full coverage non-drug pain relief measures could be taken for procedures that are with scattered pain scores, and real-time pain evaluation should be provided to determine whether further drug analgesia is required.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Niño , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/etiología , Dolor/prevención & control , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Radial arterial puncture is a painful procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of lidocaine spray (10%) on pain associated with radial artery blood withdrawal for arterial blood gas analysis. METHODS: This randomized, controlled, double-blind study was performed between December 2018 and September 2019. Before radial arterial puncture, 10% lidocaine or placebo spray was applied to each patient by the attending physician, who was blinded with regard to random assignment. The spray was administered six times on the site from a distance of 5 cm. After waiting for 5 min, a radial arterial puncture was performed routinely. The pain levels of patients during radial arterial puncture and 5 min after puncture were evaluated with the visual analog scale (VAS). The Wilcoxon test was used to compare pain scores during puncture. RESULTS: The research was performed with 67 patients (34 patients in the lidocaine group, 33 patients in the placebo group) who were admitted to the emergency department and required ABG analysis. Forty-three patients were men, and 24 were women. The ages of the patients ranged between 19 and 86 years, and the mean (± standard deviation) age was 56.3 ± 16.6 years. Pain levels, as measured by VAS, were significantly lower in the lidocaine group (24.00 mm IQR:[14.75-33.75]) compared with the placebo group (33.00 mm IQR:[22.00-61.50]) during radial arterial puncture (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The level of pain perceived during radial arterial puncture was significantly lower in those who were administered lidocaine spray. Lidocaine spray application can be used in pain management related to radial arterial puncture.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locales , Lidocaína , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Punciones/efectos adversos , Arteria Radial , Administración Cutánea , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study investigates the associations between local anesthesia practice and perioperative complication, length of stay, and hospital cost for palatoplasty in the United States. METHODS: Patients undergoing cleft palate repair between 2004 and 2015 were abstracted from the Pediatric Health Information System database. Perioperative complication, length of stay, and hospital cost were compared by local anesthesia status. Multiple logistic regressions controlled for patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Of 17,888 patients from 49 institutions who met selection criteria, 8631 (48 percent), 4447 (25 percent), and 2149 (12 percent) received epinephrine-containing lidocaine, epinephrine-containing bupivacaine, and bupivacaine or ropivacaine alone, respectively. The use of epinephrine-containing bupivacaine or bupivacaine or ropivacaine alone was associated with decreased perioperative complication [adjusted OR, 0.75 (95 percent CI, 0.61 to 0.91) and 0.63 (95 percent CI, 0.47 to 0.83); p = 0.004 and p = 0.001, respectively]. Only bupivacaine- or ropivacaine-alone recipients experienced a significantly reduced risk of prolonged length of stay on adjusted analysis [adjusted OR, 0.71 (95 percent CI, 0.55 to 0.90); p = 0.005]. Risk of increased cost was reduced in users of any local anesthetic (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Epinephrine-containing bupivacaine or bupivacaine or ropivacaine alone was associated with reduced perioperative complication following palatoplasty, while only the latter predicted a decreased postoperative length of stay. Uses of epinephrine-containing lidocaine, epinephrine-containing bupivacaine, and bupivacaine or ropivacaine alone were all associated with decreased hospital costs. Future prospective studies are warranted to further delineate the role of local anesthesia in palatal surgery. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local/economía , Fisura del Paladar/cirugía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anestesia Local/estadística & datos numéricos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/economía , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/economía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
AIM: Pain control is an important aspect of ED patient management, and there are many different protocols used around the world influenced by both availability of local resources as well as staff competency and experience. This study aims to evaluate the use of topical ketamine in acute pain reduction by directly comparing it to lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 300 adult patients classified as level 4 or 5 by ESI triage system were enrolled. These patients were divided randomly into three groups. The site of venipuncture was covered with 2 g of topical ketamine cream 10% in group one, 2 g of 5% EMLA cream in group two, and finally, in group 3 (control group), was covered with placebo (2 g of cold cream). The primary end point of the study was reported pain severity with secondary end points being onset of local anesthesia as well as any side effects noted. RESULTS: The data gathered showed pain score during venipuncture in both intervention groups were significantly lower when compared to the control group (P < 0.05). However, pain score did not differ between the 2 intervention groups (P = 0.395). There was no statistically significant difference between the ketamine or EMLA in onset of local anesthesia (P = 0.419). We noted itching and irritation was significantly higher in the EMLA group when compared to ketamine(P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study showed that local cutaneous ketamine is as effective as EMLA in relieving pain during venipuncture.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo/prevención & control , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Flebotomía/efectos adversos , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Dolor Agudo/etiología , Administración Cutánea , Adolescente , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Combinación Lidocaína y Prilocaína , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
In recent years, there has been increased interest in the study of pain in children and its treatment. It is known that when facing diagnostic and therapeutic procedures similar to those performed on adults, children either do not receive specific pain treatment or receive it on a significantly lower scale. However, recent research suggests a change in attitude and an improvement in the current treatment of children's pain. Although current knowledge demonstrates the falsity of many preconceived ideas about pain and its management, our results suggest that attitudinal change towards childhood pain remains slow and that real improvement in the training and practical application of the pediatrician who has to treat childhood pain is urgently needed. In this context, this manuscript has prepared standards and guidelines to improve pain management practices in a large number of national and international professional settings.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/terapiaAsunto(s)
Ansiedad/prevención & control , Ejercicios Respiratorios/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos/efectos adversos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Percepción del Dolor , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/psicología , Periodo Preoperatorio , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Anestesia Local/métodos , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos/efectos adversos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadAsunto(s)
Analgesia/métodos , Anestesia Local/efectos adversos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Uñas/cirugía , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Anestesia Local/métodos , Frío , Humanos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: With the emergence of blunt-tipped microcannulas, there is a hypothesis that these could cause less damage and reduce pain as compared to conventional sharp needles in eyelid surgery. The purpose is to determine whether an 18G blunt-tipped cannula can be better than a 26G needle. METHODS: This prospective, observer-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 2017 to December 2018. Sixty-eight patients were randomized to receive local anesthesia injections for upper blepharoplasty. Infiltration was performed by using a 26-gauge sharp needle on one side and on the other side, infiltration was performed by using an 18-gauge stainless-steel blunt-tipped microcannula. A numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 was used to blindly assess pain in patients receiving anesthesia injections with both needle types. Photographs of the eyelids of each patient were taken in five different periods and used by three blinded observers to identify bruise or ecchymoses. RESULTS: A total of 136 eyelid operations were performed. There was no statistically significant difference when both groups were compared; however, the average score of pain was higher in patients taking the infiltration through the needle (2.85 versus 2.50). Regarding the evaluation of bruising and ecchymoses, the results showed that, in the five periods evaluated, there was no statistical difference in bruising and ecchymosis in the eyelids when taking the infiltration through a sharp needle when compared with that of the eyelids taking infiltration through a (blunt-tipped) microcannula. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of the blunt-tipped microcannula showed a lower pain score mean than that obtained for the sharp needle (2.5 versus 2.85) (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the bruising and ecchymosis courses.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local/instrumentación , Blefaroplastia , Cánula/efectos adversos , Contusiones/prevención & control , Equimosis/prevención & control , Agujas/efectos adversos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestesia Local/métodos , Contusiones/diagnóstico , Contusiones/epidemiología , Contusiones/etiología , Método Doble Ciego , Equimosis/diagnóstico , Equimosis/epidemiología , Equimosis/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/epidemiología , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Background/aim: To compare the subjective level of pain in patients who underwent an ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) after either pericapsular anesthesia (PA) or subcapsular anesthesia (SA), based on the numeric rating scale (NRS). Materials and methods: A total of 323 patients, mean age 51, range 2182 years; 160 (49.5%) male, referred to the Interventional Radiology Clinic of Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine for image-guided PLB, between June 2019 and May 2020 were included and randomized into two groups by anesthetic type; the first (n = 171) consisted of patients undergoing SA while the second (n = 152) included patients undergoing PA. The intensity of pain at 0, 1, and 6 h after PLB was evaluated between the groups using NRS. Results: At hours 0, 1, and 6, the median [range] NRS scores in the subcapsular and pericapsular groups were 2 [12] versus 3 [24] (P < 0.001), 1 [01] versus 1 [12] (P < 0.001), and 0 [00] versus 1 [01] (P < 0.001), respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that the patients who underwent the subcostal procedure with subcapsular anesthesia reported the lowest pain scores and intercostal procedure with pericapsular anesthesia reported the worst pain scores for each time point: 0 h 1 [12] versus 3 [34], P < 0.001; 1 h 1 [01] versus 1 [12], P < 0.001; and 6 h 0 [00] versus 0 [01], P < 0.001, respectively. Conclusion: Subcapsular anesthesia is a well-tolerated procedure compared to a pericapsular procedure. Furthermore, the application of a subcapsular anesthetic with a subcostal approach was reported to result in the lowest pain and greatest patient comfort.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local , Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Hepatopatías/diagnóstico , Hígado/patología , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Anestesia Local/efectos adversos , Anestesia Local/métodos , Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Femenino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Awake, unsedated in-office upper airway procedures are performed frequently and have high completion rates, yet less is known about the patients' pain experience and potentially influencing factors. It is also unclear if patients' pain experiences become worse with repeated procedures. We identified procedure- and patient-related factors that might influence procedural completion and pain scores. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: Pre-, intra-, and post-procedure pain scores were collected prospectively for awake unsedated upper airway procedures performed at a single institution over a 5-year period. Patient factors reviewed were demographics, body mass index, psychiatric and/or pain diagnosis, and related medications. Procedure factors reviewed were procedure type, route, side, and performance of the same procedure multiple times. Patients reported their pain level before, during, and after the procedure using a standard 0 to 10 scale. Maximum pain score change (PΔmax), or the difference between highest and lowest reported pain levels, was calculated. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Procedure completion was 98.7% for 609 first time patients and 99.0% in 60 patients undergoing 292 repeat procedures. PΔmax did not covary with age, gender, or BMI. PΔmax covaried with pain and psychiatric conditions and associated medications. PΔmax was highest for injection medialization and lowest for tracheoscopy. PΔmax decreased over time for those undergoing multiple identical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Procedures were performed with a very high completion rate and low pain scores. Age, sex, and BMI did not affect pain experience. A combination of pain and psychiatric conditions did. Injection medialization had the highest PΔmax and tracheoscopy the lowest. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1580-E1588, 2021.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de la Laringe/terapia , Laringoscopía/efectos adversos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Administración Tópica , Adulto , Anciano , Anestesia Local , Biopsia/efectos adversos , Biopsia/métodos , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Inyecciones Intralesiones/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de la Laringe/diagnóstico , Laringe/diagnóstico por imagen , Laringe/cirugía , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , VigiliaRESUMEN
Chronic renal failure patients undergoing hemodialysis complain of moderate pain from repeated punctures of the arteriovenous fistula. This study examined the optimal application time of thermotherapy for reducing pain, anxiety, and side effects during arteriovenous fistula puncture. This study was conducted as a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. The participants were arteriovenous fistula puncture patients with chronic renal failure who were divided into two thermotherapy groups and one control group. This study was approved by the institutional review board and registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (KCT0003768). Differences between groups regarding pain, anxiety, and side effects were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, the χ2 test, and the Scheffé test. A significant difference was observed between the 10-min and 20-min thermotherapy groups and the control group in terms of the pain they experienced. Additionally, more side effects were encountered in the 20-min thermotherapy group than in the 10-min group. The 10-min application of thermotherapy for an arteriovenous fistula puncture showed the same pain-reducing effect as the conventional 20-min application. The study confirmed a 10-min application of thermotherapy to be an effective nursing intervention for pain relief without side effects.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/prevención & control , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Punciones/efectos adversos , Fístula Arteriovenosa , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Diálisis Renal , Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Several transperineal biopsy series have proven feasibility under local anesthesia. However, there is a lack of large analyses detailing pain outcomes and factors influencing pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2016 to 2019 we performed a multicenter prospective study in men undergoing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transperineal fusion biopsies (target+systematic cores) under local anesthesia. Primary outcomes were 1) pain scores (assessed through a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale) and 2) identification of factors associated with severe pain. The secondary outcome was to evaluate pain influence on clinically significant prostate cancer target cores detection. RESULTS: We included 1,008 men undergoing transperineal fusion biopsies under local anesthesia. Mean±SD numeric rating scale pain scores were 3.9±2.1 at local anesthesia administration and 3.1±2.3 when performing biopsies. Pain was not associated with lower clinically significant prostate cancer detection on targeted cores (p=0.23 and p=0.47 depending on clinically significant prostate cancer definition). On multivariate analysis age (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99) and severe anxiety (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.83-4.89) were a protective and risk factor, respectively, for severe biopsy pain. Procedural time was also associated with an increased risk of experiencing severe biopsy pain (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.08). If aiming to test the possible effects of anxiety preventive measures on pain, an anxiety cutoff greater than 6 on a numeric rating scale would decrease to 13% the number of patients being treated while identifying 56% of those experiencing severe pain. CONCLUSIONS: Transperineal fusion biopsies under local anesthesia result in moderate pain. Pain does not influence clinically significant prostate cancer target detection. Patient anxiety predicts pain. A numeric rating scale based anxiety assessment may be used to identify those at higher risk for experiencing severe pain in men undergoing transperineal fusion biopsies.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/efectos adversos , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/métodos , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/psicología , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/psicología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen Multimodal/métodos , Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Perineo/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
Objectives: To prospectively register self-reported pain levels associated with office cystoscopy with or without bladder tumour biopsy and fulguration.Patients and methods: During a 15-month period, patients examined with cystoscopy under local anaesthesia graded their pain level using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). All patients were examined in the lithotomy position and lidocaine gel was used in all. A bladder instillation or a submucosal injection of lidocaine was given mainly in patients treated with extirpation of larger tumours.Results: The pain perception was graded by the patients as none (VAS = 0) or mild (VAS = 1-3) in 86% of the 1,314 cystoscopies. Fewer patients (65% out of 258) reported VAS 0-3 when cystoscopy with biopsy and fulguration of bladder tumour was performed. More than 97% of all patients stated that they would prefer treatment under local anaesthesia in the case of a future recurrence.Conclusion: The VAS-scores after diagnostic cystoscopy are in accordance with those previously reported, with the absolute majority reporting no or mild pain. Patients treated with extirpation of bladder tumours reported higher levels of pain but still within acceptable limits. This confirms the potential of treating most patients with small-sized bladder tumour recurrences under local anaesthesia.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Cistoscopía/efectos adversos , Electrocoagulación/efectos adversos , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia , Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Aromatherapy with essential oils can be used to relieve children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlations between psychological and physiologic findings after lavender oil inhalation among children assigned to undergo tooth extraction. A total of 126 children aged between 6 and 12 years were enrolled in the study. The groups were randomly divided into control and lavender groups. The lavender group inhaled 100% lavender oil for 3 min before the interventions, the control group received no prior application. Psychological assessments were made using face image scale (FIS), Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) and Wong-Baker pain rating scale (WBS). Physiologic changes were assessed using vital signs evaluations. All parameters were noted prior to applications, after inhalation, anesthesia injection, and tooth extraction. The lavender group showed significant lower anxiety and pain scores after tooth extraction (p < 0.05). Significantly lower levels of blood pressures and a significant pulse rate drop were found after inhalation in the lavender group. A statistically significant increase in heart rate was observed after anesthesia injection and tooth extraction in the control group (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Lavender oil can be preferred as a treatment of choice in routine pediatric dentistry.Trial registration number: NCT04115891 (Lavender Oil Inhalation Help to Overcome Dental Anxiety Among Children)What is Known:⢠Dental anxiety is the most common factor that causes children to have difficulty with the dentist and their parents during treatment.⢠Aromatherapy with essential oils can be used to relieve children.What is New:⢠Aromatherapy with lavender oil relieves the child by reducing the level of anxiety and facilitates dental treatment.⢠During surgical procedures such as local anesthesia and tooth extraction, lavender oil inhalation decreases pain levels of children.
Asunto(s)
Aromaterapia/métodos , Ansiedad al Tratamiento Odontológico/terapia , Aceites Volátiles/uso terapéutico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/terapia , Aceites de Plantas/uso terapéutico , Administración por Inhalación , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Lavandula , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transrectal (TR) ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy is one of the most commonly performed urologic procedures worldwide. The major drawback of this approach is the associated risk for infectious complications. Sepsis rates are increasing due to rising antibiotic resistance, representing a global issue. The transperineal (TP) approach for prostate biopsy has recently been adopted at many centres as an alternative to the TR biopsy, and it was shown to be associated with a lower risk for sepsis. The aim of this study was to assess safety and tolerability of TP prostate biopsy performed in local anaesthesia. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data of patients who had undergone office-based TP prostate biopsy in local anaesthesia, performed by a single surgeon between January 2015 and May 2019. We evaluated the patients' acceptance of the procedure by a pain score, as well as its safety and diagnostic performance. RESULTS: Four hundred patients were included. Median age was 66 years [range, 49-86]. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration was 6.4 ng/ml [range, 0.3-1400], median PSA density was 0.15 ng/ml2 [range, 0-31.1] and median prostate volume was 40 ml [range, 6-150]. A total of 118 (29.5%) and 105 (26.2%) patients had orally received two and one doses of 500 mg fluoroquinolone, respectively, and 177 (44.3%) patients did not receive any antibiotic prophylaxis. No infectious complications occurred. Median pain score was 2.0 (range, 0-8). Overall cancer detection rate was 64.5% (258/400). CONCLUSIONS: Freehand TP prostate biopsy in local anaesthesia is a safe, effective and well-tolerated outpatient procedure with a high cancer detection rate. The elimination of infectious complications and its high accuracy make this technique a feasible alternative to the TR approach for the urological office. We assume that the single puncture and our trocar-like access sheath introduction technique diminish tissue trauma and bacterial exposition, and thus contribute to these promising results.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Anestesia Local , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Calicreínas/sangre , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen Multimodal/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Perineo/cirugía , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Recto/microbiología , Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodosRESUMEN
AIMS: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) under general anesthesia or local anesthesia plus intraoperative analgesia in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at unusual regions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From July 2012 to October 2019, 83 consecutive patients with 107 HCC lesions were treated with interventional radiology therapy. The lesions were located at some unusual regions such as diaphragmatic surface, hepatic hilum, hepatic subcapsular region, tissues near inferior vena cava, and tissues near the colon. General anesthesia was applied in 57 cases (general anesthesia group) and local anesthesia plus intraoperative analgesia was used in 26 cases (local anesthesia group). All patients were treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, followed immediately by RFA. The rate of tumor inactivation, time used for placing RF needles to the scheduled sites, pain score, and complications were analyzed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: All continuous variables were tested for the normal/nonnormal distribution by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The t-test was used to analyze the normal distribution variables; the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to measure nonnormal distribution variables; and the Chi-square test for categorical variables. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The treatments were successful in all patients, including 51 cases of complete response (CR) and 6 cases of partial response (PR) in the general anesthesia group and 18 cases of CR and 8 cases of PR in the local anesthesia group (P = 0.049). The time used for placing the needles to the scheduled sites was 1-5 min (mean 2 min) in the general anesthesia group and 2-9 min (mean 4 min) in the local analgesia group (P < 0.001). The pain scores ranged from 0 to 2 points (mean 1 point) in the general anesthesia group and 2-9 points (mean 5 points) in the local anesthesia group (P < 0.001). With regard to complications, seven cases had pneumothorax and four cases had slight hepatic subcapsular hemorrhage in the general anesthesia group and four cases of pneumothorax and three cases of slight hepatic subcapsular hemorrhage in the local anesthesia group, and the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups (P = 0.715). CONCLUSIONS: For HCC located at unusual regions, general anesthesia is superior to local anesthesia plus intraoperative analgesia in percutaneous RFA in reducing the difficulty of the procedure and improving the safety of RFA.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia General/estadística & datos numéricos , Anestesia Local/estadística & datos numéricos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Analgesia/métodos , Analgesia/estadística & datos numéricos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Terapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Femenino , Arteria Hepática/cirugía , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Hígado/irrigación sanguínea , Hígado/patología , Hígado/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: Nerve stimulation guidance and ultrasound guidance are two major methods that have been widely accepted and applied in axillary brachial plexus block. However, the differences between the effects of these two types of guidance still need to be further elucidated for clinical usage. Materials and Methods: Overall, 208 patients undergoing elective upper limb surgeries and receiving axillary brachial plexus block were recruited in our study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either ultrasound guidance (group U, n = 112) or nerve stimulation (group N, n = 96). Pinprick test was performed for assessing the sensory blockades. The pain was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels were measured by dichloro-dihydro-fluorescein diacetate staining and serum levels of nitric oxide (NO), nitric oxide synthases (NOS), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1) were evaluated by ELISA. Results: Ultrasound guidance significantly enhanced the quality of the sensory blockade and reduced the VAS scores when compared with the nerve stimulator guidance. In addition, the production of ROS, NO, NOS, TNF-α, and MCP-1 were significantly alleviated by ultrasound guidance. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block relieves pain during operation, provides higher success rates in the nerve block, causes less vascular damage and results in lower levels of inflammatory cytokines secretion when compared with neurostimulator-directed brachial plexus blockage.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Plexo Braquial/diagnóstico por imagen , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/efectos adversos , Femenino , Mano/irrigación sanguínea , Mano/diagnóstico por imagen , Mano/inervación , Mano/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/diagnóstico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pediatric hypertrophic burn scars are challenging to treat due to their widespread nature and pain associated with the treatment. Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) injection with or without 5-fluorouracil (5FU) is considered first-line treatment for severe hypertrophic scars. The pain associated with the procedure, the uneven topography, and epidermal atrophy, all limit the application of this treatment modality. AIMS: We sought to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety profile of a novel thermomechanical system (Tixel, Novoxel) for transdermal delivery of a topical solution containing TAC and 5-FU in the treatment of hypertrophic scars. PATIENTS/METHODS: A retrospective study of pediatric hypertrophic burn scars treated between 2015 and 2017 was performed. Epidemiologic, treatment data, effectiveness score, and safety were reviewed. RESULTS: Four children (one male and three females, ages 3-10 years old) with hypertrophic burn scars treated with the Tixel device were evaluated. Mean scar VSS was reduced from 8.4 ± 0.8-5.2 ± 0.5 (P-value - .001) after eight treatments. The mean improvement of toughness, thickness, color, and general aesthetic impression was 3.1 ± 0.43 â 2.2 ± 0.31, 3.4 ± 0.5 â 1.9 ± 0.63, 2.7 ± 0.21 â 2.4 ± 0.25, and 3.23 ± 0.44 â 1.6 ± 0.64, respectively. Mean treatment pain VAS score was 1.74 ± 0.9. Patient's parents rated their satisfaction level as "moderate-high." No topical or systemic complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Thermomechanical decomposition of the stratum corneum, in combination with topical application of TAC and 5-FU, is a safe, relatively painless, and efficient modality for the treatment of pediatric hypertrophic burn scars.