Clove Oil Endorsed Transdermal Flux of Dronedarone Hydrochloride Loaded Bilosomal Nanogel: Factorial Design, In vitro Evaluation and Ex vivo Permeation.

The goal of this study was to develop a bilosomal gel formulation to enhance transdermal permeability of dronedarone hyrdrochloride (DRN) which suffers from poor oral absorption and limited bioavailability. To overcome this obstacle, bilosomes were successfully prepared using 23 full-factorial design. Span®40, cholesterol, sodium deoxycholate (bile salt), clove oil (permeability enhancer), and either Tween® 60 or Tween® 80 (edge activator) were used in bilosome preparation by ethanol injection method. In this design, independent variables were X1, edge activator type; X2, edge activator amount (mg); and X3, permeability enhancer concentration (% w/v). Optimal formula (B2) of the highest desirability of (0.776) demonstrated minimum vesicle size (VS) of 312.4 ± 24.42 nm, maximum absolute value of zeta potential (ZP) - 36.17 ± 2.57 mV, maximum entrapment efficiency (EE %) of 80.95 ± 3.01%, maximum deformability Index (DI) of 8.24 ± 1.26 g and maximum drug flux after 12 h (J12) of 21.23 ± 1.54 µg/cm2 h upon ex vivo permeation study. After 12 h, 70.29 ± 6.46% of DRN was released from B2. TEM identification of B2 showed spherical shaped nanosized vesicles which were physically stable for 3 months at different temperatures. B2 was incorporated into carboxymethylcellulose gel base for easiness of dermal application. B2 gel demonstrated good physical properties, non-Newtonian psuedoplastic flow, and enhanced release (57.0 ± 8.68% of DRN compared to only 13.3 ± 1.2% released from drug suspension after 12 h) and enhanced skin permeation.

Exploratory Evaluation of Rhythm Control by Dronedarone in Combination With Low-Dose Rivaroxaban, Warfarin, Antiplatelet, or None of the Antithrombotic Therapy in High-Risk Patients With Non-Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The emerging data supports rhythm control to prevent major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Limited data demonstrated rivaroxaban 10 mg combining dronedarone seemed feasible. This study aimed at investigating clinical events in a dronedarone-treated cohort. This exploratory, retrospective chart review was conducted in nonpermanent AF patients receiving dronedarone for ≥ 3 months between 2009/1 and 2016/2. In Taiwan, dronedarone's labeled indication was strict to age ≥ 70 or 65 to 70 years with either hypertension, diabetes, prior stroke, or left atrium >50 mm. We divided all into 4 groups using antithrombotic strategies to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and MACE endpoints. A total of 689 patients (mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 3.8 ± 1.4) were analyzed: rivaroxaban 10 mg (n = 93, 13.5%), warfarin (n = 89, 12.9%), antiplatelet (n = 331, 48.0%), and none (n = 176, 25.5%). During the follow-up period (mean 946 ± 493.8 days), the rivaroxaban group did not report any stroke or thromboembolism (ishcmeic stroke rate: antiplatelet [0.6%], none [1.1%]; hemorrahgic stroke rate: warfarin [2.2%]; thromboembolism rate: warfarin [2.2%]). There was no significant difference in safety, effectiveness, and MACE endpoints between groups. Also, >104 weeks of dronedarone use was the independent predictor for MACE after adjusting the strategy and other covariates (hazard ratio 0.14 [95% confidence interval 0.04-0.44], P = .001). Our findings warrant concomitant rivaroxaban 10 mg and dronedarone for further investigation. Regardless of antithrombotic strategies, a more extended persistence of dronedarone was associated with fewer MACE.

Safety and Effectiveness of Rivaroxaban in Combination with Various Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Patients with Non-Permanent Atrial Fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Rivaroxaban reduces the risk of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, who often also receive antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) to maintain sinus rhythm. Current guidelines contraindicate concomitant use of rivaroxaban with the popular AAD dronedarone, despite little data demonstrating interactions with AADs. This study investigates the outcomes of concomitant rivaroxaban and AAD drug use in a real-world cohort. METHODS: This retrospective study included 1777 non-permanent AF patients taking rivaroxaban for ≥ 1 month between 2011 and 2016 from a multicenter cohort in Taiwan, and compared concomitant AAD use against clinical outcome endpoints for safety, effectiveness, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to evaluate the association between concomitant AAD use and outcomes. RESULTS: Patients were divided into rivaroxaban alone (n = 1205) and with concomitant amiodarone (n = 177), dronedarone (n = 231), or propafenone (n = 164) groups. The proportion of patients using rivaroxaban 10 mg was highest in the concomitant dronedarone group: rivaroxaban alone, 53.6%; with amiodarone, 57.6%; with dronedarone, 77.1%; and with propafenone, 46.3% (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidences of safety (p = 0.892), effectiveness (p = 0.336), and MACE (p = 0.674) were similar between the four groups; however, there were significantly fewer new systemic thromboembolisms in the dronedarone group: rivaroxaban alone, 2.5%; with amiodarone, 0.6%; with dronedarone, 0%; and with propafenone, 1.2% (p = 0.029). The all-cause death rate was also lowest in the dronedarone group: rivaroxaban alone, 9.0%; with amiodarone, 9.6%; with dronedarone, 3.0%; and with propafenone: 6.1% (p = 0.013). After covariate adjustment, there were no differences in the safety, effectiveness, and MACE endpoints between patients receiving or not receiving AADs. CONCLUSION: Concomitant use of rivaroxaban with AADs appears to be well tolerated, warranting further investigation into the apparent benefits of a reduced dose of rivaroxaban combined with dronedarone.

Heterotropic activation of flavonoids on cytochrome P450 3A4: A case example of alleviating dronedarone-induced cytotoxicity.

The clinical drug-drug interactions mediated by heterotropic activation on cytochrome P450 (CYP450) kinetics, especially CYP3A4, have received wide concern in recent years. Flavonoids, a group of important natural substances with various pharmacological activities, distribute widely among vegetables, fruits and herbs. The frequent and numerous uses of flavonoids may increase the risk of food/herb-drug interactions. However, little is known about activation effects of flavonoids on CYP3A4. The aim of this study was to investigate activation of CYP3A4 by flavonoids, explore the molecular mechanism, and assess the biological effects on dronedarone (DND) induced toxicity. The results showed that flavone, tangeretin, sinensetin and 6-hydroxyflavone increased the cell viability by decreasing DND-induced cytotoxicity. These four flavonoids could activate the metabolism of DND in hamster pharmacokinetics study. Furthermore, both molecular docking and circular dichroism analysis partially illustrated the molecular mechanism of heterotropic activation. Finally, the pharmacophore model suggested B aromatic ring, hydrophobic groups at 7-position and hydrogen bond acceptors at 4-position may play a vital role in activation of flavonoids on CYP3A4. Taken together, our findings would provide useful information for predicting the potential risks of flavonoid-containing food/herb-drug interactions in humans.

Dronedarone-Induced Cardiac Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Its Mitigation by Epoxyeicosatrienoic Acids.

Dronedarone and amiodarone are structurally similar antiarrhythmic drugs. Dronedarone worsens cardiac adverse effects with unknown causes while amiodarone has no cardiac adversity. Dronedarone induces preclinical mitochondrial toxicity in rat liver and exhibits clinical hepatotoxicity. Here, we further investigated the relative potential of the antiarrhythmic drugs in causing mitochondrial injury in cardiomyocytes. Differentiated rat H9c2 cardiomyocytes were treated with dronedarone, amiodarone, and their respective metabolites namely N-desbutyldronedarone (NDBD) and N-desethylamiodarone (NDEA). Intracellular ATP content, mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm), and inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT1) activity and arachidonic acid (AA) metabolism were measured in H9c2 cells. Inhibition of electron transport chain (ETC) activities and uncoupling of ETC were further studied in isolated rat heart mitochondria. Dronedarone, amiodarone, NDBD and NDEA decreased intracellular ATP content significantly (IC50 = 0.49, 1.84, 1.07, and 0.63 µM, respectively) and dissipated Δψm potently (IC50 = 0.5, 2.94, 12.8, and 7.38 µM, respectively). Dronedarone, NDBD, and NDEA weakly inhibited CPT1 activity while amiodarone (IC50 > 100 µM) yielded negligible inhibition. Only dronedarone inhibited AA metabolism to its regioisomeric epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) consistently and potently. NADH-supplemented ETC activity was inhibited by dronedarone, amiodarone, NDBD and NDEA (IC50 = 3.07, 5.24, 11.94, and 16.16 µM, respectively). Cytotoxicity, ATP decrease and Δψm disruption were ameliorated via exogenous pre-treatment of H9c2 cells with 11, 12-EET and 14, 15-EET. Our study confirmed that dronedarone causes mitochondrial injury in cardiomyocytes by perturbing Δψm, inhibiting mitochondrial complex I, uncoupling ETC and dysregulating AA-EET metabolism. We postulate that cardiac mitochondrial injury is one potential contributing factor to dronedarone-induced cardiac failure exacerbation.

Reduced Food-Effect on Intestinal Absorption of Dronedarone by Self-microemulsifying Drug Delivery System (SMEDDS).

The oral absorption of dronedarone (DRN), a benzofuran derivative with anti-arrhythmic activity, is significantly affected by food intake. The absolute bioavailability of the marketed product (Multaq, Sanofi, U.S.) was about 4% without food, but increased to 15% when administered with a high fat meal. Therefore, to reduce the food-effect on the intestinal absorption of DRN, a novel self-microemulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) was formulated and the comparative in vivo absorption studies with the marketed product were carried out using male beagle dogs either in the fasted or fed state. The SMEDDS consisted of the drug, Labrafil M 1944CS, and Kolliphor EL in a weight ratio of 1 : 1 : 2, rapidly formed a fine oil-in-water emulsion with a droplet size less than 50 nm. An in vivo absorption study revealed that the area-under-curve (AUC0-24 h) and maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) were 10.4-fold (p<0.05) and 8.6-fold (p<0.05) higher, respectively, after the marketed product was orally administered to beagles in the fed state when compared to those in the fasted state. This food-effect were remarkably alleviated by SMEDDS formulation, with AUC0-24 h and Cmax 2.9-fold (p<0.05) and 2.6-fold (p<0.05) higher in the fed state when compared to the fasted state, by facilitating intestinal absorption of DRN in the fasted state. The results of this study suggest that SMEDDS may decrease the differences in oral absorption of DRN between the prandial states, improving therapeutic efficacy as well as patient compliance.

[Update on current care guidelines: atrial fibrillation]. / Eteisvärinä.

According to the update of the Finnish guidelines for management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) dronedarone should be used only in patients with non-permanent AF as a second line medication. It is recommended to monitor the patients regularly and stop dronedarone if permanent AF, heart failure or other adverse events are detected. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban can be used as an alternative to warfarin in patients requiring oral anticoagulation therapy. The selection between warfarin and the new anticoagulants should be based on careful evaluation of the benefits and disadvantages of the drugs in a given patient.

Electrophysiologic profile of dronedarone on the ventricular level: beneficial effect on postrepolarization refractoriness in the presence of rapid phase 3 repolarization.

BACKGROUND: Dronedarone (D) is developed to maintain sinus rhythm in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation. The aim of the present study was to investigate, whether dronedarone also has an antiarrhythmic potential in the ventricle and to elucidate the mechanisms for its low proarrhythmic potential in an experimental whole heart model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-five rabbits underwent chronic treatment with D (n = 15; 50 mg · kg(-1) · d(-1)) and amiodarone (A; n = 20; 50 mg · kg(-1) · d(-1)). Hearts were perfused on a Langendorff apparatus. Results were compared with hearts acutely treated with sotalol (S; 50-100 µM; n = 14). A 12-lead electrocardiogram and up to 8 ventricular epi- and endocardial monophasic action potentials showed a significant prolongation of QT interval (D: +24 milliseconds, A: +28 milliseconds, S: +35 milliseconds (50 µM), +56 milliseconds (100 µM); P < 0.02) compared with baseline. In contrast to D and A, S led to a significant increase in dispersion of repolarization and exhibited reverse use dependence. D, A, and S increased refractory period, resulting in a significant increase in postrepolarization refractoriness (effective refractory period minus action potential duration; D = +12 milliseconds; A = +14 milliseconds; S = +25 milliseconds; P < 0.05). S led to a triangular action potential configuration, whereas D and A caused a fast phase 3 prolongation. After lowering of potassium concentration, 50% of S-treated hearts showed torsade de pointes, in contrast to an absence of torsade de pointes in D and A. CONCLUSIONS: Prolongation of myocardial repolarization and postrepolarization refractoriness by D may act antiarrhythmic. A fast phase 3 repolarization in the absence of both increased dispersion of repolarization and reverse use dependence prevents proarrhythmia.

Electrophysiology and adult congenital heart disease: advances and options.

Although "congenital heart disease" incorporates a broad and diverse spectrum of inborn cardiac disorders, one shared feature is the propensity for cardiac arrhythmias, albeit to varying degrees. The magnitude of this issue is underscored by its high prevalence, major impact on morbidity and disability, considerable consummation of healthcare resources, and loss of life at ages well below normative population values. Moreover, with changing demographics, arrhythmias increasingly afflict the aging and growing population of survivors with congenital heart disease. Nevertheless, the field of cardiac electrophysiology has, auspiciously, greatly matured over the past 2 decades. The fruits of this progress are largely applicable to adults with congenital heart disease. This review focuses on recent advances and emerging therapeutic options that are providing safer solutions and increasing the effectiveness with which arrhythmias may be managed in adults with congenital heart disease, spanning pharmacotherapy to innovative interventions.

Effect of triiodothyronine on antidepressant screening tests in mice and on presynaptic 5-HT1A receptors: mediation by thyroid hormone α receptors.

Although triiodothyronine (T3) is widely used clinically, preclinical support for its antidepressant-like effects is limited, and the mechanisms are unknown. We evaluated 1) the antidepressant-like effects of T3 in the novelty suppressed feeding test (NSFT), tail suspension test (TST), and forced swim test (FST), 2) the role of presynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors in the antidepressant-like mechanism of T3 by the hypothermic response to the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, 8-hydroxy-N,N-dipropyl-2-aminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT), 3) the thyroid hormone receptor type mediating the antidepressant-like effects by concurrent administration of the specific thyroid hormone α receptor (TRα) antagonist, dronedarone, and 4) the presence of these effects in both genders. Male and female BALB/c mice were administered 1) T3 (20, 50, 200, or 500 µg/kg per day) or vehicle or 2) T3 (50 µg/kg per day), dronedarone (100 µM/day), or the combination intraperitoneally for 21 days and then underwent a behavioral test battery. The NSFT showed a shortened latency to feed in males at the two lower T3 doses. The TST and FST showed decreased immobility in male mice at T3 doses >20 µg/kg per day and in females at all T3 doses. Concurrent dronedarone prevented T3 effects in males on the NSFT and in the TST and FST in both genders. Attenuation of 8-OH-DPAT-induced hypothermia was observed in males only and may be reduced by concurrent dronedarone. These findings support an antidepressant-like effect of T3. Attenuation of 8-OH-DPAT-induced hypothermia in males only suggests the need to evaluate a possible gender disparity in the role of presynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors in T3 antidepressant mechanisms. Blockade by dronedarone of the antidepressant-like effects of T3 suggests that these effects are TRα receptor-mediated.

The pharmaceutical pipeline for atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a significant burden of morbidity and increased risk of mortality. Beyond outstanding advances in catheter ablation procedures, antiarrhythmic drug therapy remains a corner-stone to restore and maintain sinus rhythm. However, potentially life-threatening hazards (proarrhythmia) and significant non-cardiac organ toxicity have made new drug development of prominent relevance. Multichannel blocking, atrial selectivity, and the reduction of the risk of adverse events have all constituted the main theme of modern antifibrillatory drug development. Dronedarone, an analog of amiodarone, has the unique characteristic of being the first antiarrhythmic drug demonstrated to reduce hospitalizations in AF. Dronedarone is associated with less systemic toxicity than amiodarone, although being less effective for sinus rhythm maintenance. Atrial selective agents have been developed to target ion channels expressed selectively in the atria. Among the most promising drugs of this class is vernakalant, which has been shown effective for the acute conversion of AF with small risk of proarrhythmia. Finally, increasing evidences support antiarrhythmic effectiveness of traditional non-antiarrhythmic drugs, such as renin-angiotensin system blockers, statins, and omega-3 fatty acids. In this article, we will focus on recent advances in antiarrhythmic therapy for AF, reviewing the possible clinical utility of novel antifibrillatory agents.

A new agent for atrial fibrillation: electrophysiological properties of dronedarone.

Although originally synthesized as an antianginal compound, amiodarone has emerged as an effective antiarrhythmic for both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Over the decades, the properties, the effectiveness, the merits as well as the shortcomings of the compound have been well established. The major limitations of this agent are mainly due to the systemic side effects seen with prolonged therapy. Many of the toxic effects observed are primarily caused by the high iodine content present in the amiodarone molecule. Dronedarone, the first noniodinated amiodarone congener, has been developed largely to obtain the antiarrhythmic efficacy in the control of atrial fibrillation without the known adverse side effects of dronedarone. In this part of the supplement, the focus is the electrophysiological effects of dronedarone with the characterization in normal cardiac cells, in animal models of disease, as well as in human studies.

Augmenting maintenance of sinus rhythm in the control of atrial fibrillation by antiarrhythmic drug combinations.

In recent years, a major development in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is the use of catheter ablation, and a significant number of patients may benefit from this mode of therapy. On a global scale, it may not be feasible to deal with most patients solely on the basis of ablation. Therefore, it is likely that much of the therapy for AF will continue to rely on antiarrhythmic agents for maintaining sinus rhythm. For many years, amiodarone and sotalol have been the dominant antiarrhythmic agents, with amiodarone being the most effective antiarrhythmic in suppressing AF; however, amiodarone use is limited due to concerns of end-organ toxicity. Upstream therapies, such as statins, fish oil, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers may also provide additive efficacy to these and other membrane-active antiarrhythmics. In recent years, a number of new agents are being developed and the first successful congener of amiodarone, dronedarone, has been shown to be effective in controlling AF and reducing cardiovascular hospitalization. This paper explores the possibility of augmenting the extent of controlling AF by combining multiple potent antiarrhythmic agents old and new.

[New antiarrhythmic drugs for treatment of atrial fibrillation]. / Uudet rytmihäiriölääkkeet eteisvärinän hoidossa.

Pharmacotherapy of atrial fibrillation (AF) is demanding, because currently available antiarrhythmic drugs have low efficacy and many side effects. In drug development, the focus has been on amiodarone-like multichannel blockers, atrial-specific ion channel blockers, and novel non-channel agents targeting atrial remodelling. Dronedarone, an amiodarone analogue without iodine, was recently approved for treatment of AF. It is less effective than amiodarone, but serious adverse events are rare. Vernakalant, an atrial-selective drug with low proarrhythmic risk, is effective in cardioversion and it may also prevent AF recurrences. So-called upstream therapy with angiotensin converting enzyme and angiotensin receptor inhibitors, statins and omega-3 fatty acids needs further clinical validation.

Acute dronedarone is inferior to amiodarone in terminating and preventing atrial fibrillation in canine atria.

BACKGROUND: Dronedarone is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) as a safe alternative to amiodarone. There are no full-length published reports describing the effectiveness of acute dronedarone use against AF in experimental or clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of acute dronedarone and amiodarone on electrophysiological parameters, and their anti-AF efficacy in canine isolated arterially perfused right atria. METHODS: Transmembrane action potentials and pseudoelectrocardiograms were recorded. Acetylcholine (ACh, 1.0 muM) was used to induce persistent AF. RESULTS: Amiodarone-induced changes were much more pronounced than those of dronedarone on (1) action potential duration (DeltaAPD(90), +51 +/- 17 ms vs. 4 +/- 6 ms, P >.01), (2) effective refractory period (DeltaERP, +84 +/- 23 ms vs. 18 +/- 9 ms, P <.001), (3) diastolic threshold of excitation (DeltaDTE, +0.32 +/- 0.11 mA vs. 0.03 +/- 0.02 mA, P <.001), and (4) V(max) (DeltaV(max), -43 +/- 14% vs. -11 +/- 4%, P <.01, n = 5 to 6; all recorded at 10 muM, cycle length = 500 ms). Persistent AF was induced in 10 of 10 atria exposed to ACh alone; subsequent addition of dronedarone or amiodarone terminated AF in 1 of 7 and 4 of 5 atria, respectively. Persistent ACh-mediated AF was induced in 5 of 6 and 0 of 5 atria pretreated with dronedarone and amiodarone, respectively. CONCLUSION: The electrophysiological effects and anti-AF efficacy of acute dronedarone are much weaker than those of amiodarone in a canine model of AF. The efficacy of acute dronedarone to prevent induction of acetylcholine-mediated AF as well as to terminate persistent AF in canine right atria is relatively poor. Our data suggest that acute dronedarone is a poor substitute for amiodarone for acute cardioversion of AF or prevention of AF recurrence.

New antiarrhythmic drugs for treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Inadequacies in current therapies for atrial fibrillation have made new drug development crucial. Conventional antiarrhythmic drugs increase the risk of ventricular proarrhythmia. In drug development, the focus has been on favourable multichannel-blocking profiles, atrial-specific ion-channels, and novel non-channel targets (upstream therapy). Molecular modification of the highly effective multichannel blocker, amiodarone, to improve safety and tolerability has produced promising analogues such as dronedarone, although this drug seems less effective than does amiodarone. Vernakalant, an atrial-selective drug with reduced proarrhythmic risk, might be useful for cardioversion in atrial fibrillation. Ranolazine, another atrial-selective agent initially developed as an antianginal, has efficacy for atrial fibrillation and is being tested in prospective clinical trials. So-called upstream therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme and angiotensin-receptor inhibitors, statins, or omega-3 fatty acids and fish oil that target atrial remodelling could be effective, but need further clinical validation. We focus on the basic and clinical pharmacology of newly emerging antiarrhythmic drugs and non-traditional approaches such as upstream therapy for atrial fibrillation.

New antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation: focus on dronedarone and vernakalant.

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is forecast to rise to 2-5% of the general population by 2050. Of the two fundamental treatment strategies for AF management, rhythm control is the approach which is generally preferred for active, symptomatic, and/or younger patients, whereas rate control is all that is found necessary in the more elderly, sedentary, asymptomatic individual. In many cases, at neither extreme, there remains a genuine choice of therapy, and for those patients, antiarrhythmic strategies would be preferred if effective and safe antiarrhythmic medications were available. Many new antiarrhythmic agents exploiting new mechanisms of action or novel combinations of established antiarrhythmic activity are currently being investigated. Agents which selectively inhibit ion channels specifically involved in atrial repolarization, so-called atrial repolarization delaying agents, are widely acknowledged as potentially ideal antiarrhythmic treatments, as they will probably be both effective and safe, at the very least (free of pro-arrhythmic effects at the ventricular level). Modified analogues of traditional antiarrhythmic drugs with different combinations of ion channel and receptor blocking effects, novel mechanisms of action, and less complicated metabolic profiles are also under development. Completely innovative antiarrhythmic agents with new antiarrhythmic mechanisms, such as stretch receptor antagonism, sodium calcium exchanger blockade, late sodium channel inhibition, and gap junction modulation are also being explored. In addition, there is increasing evidence in support of the antiarrhythmic action of non-antiarrhythmic drugs. Treatments with statins, omega-3 fatty acids, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, and aldosterone antagonists are all potentially valuable, over and above any effect related to the treatment of underlying heart disease.

New antiarrhythmic treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Antiarrhythmic pharmaceutical development for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is moving in several directions. The efficacy of existing drugs, such as carvedilol, for rate control and, possibly, suppression of AF, is more appreciated. Efforts are being made to modify existing agents, such as amiodarone, in an attempt to ameliorate safety and adverse effect concerns. This has resulted in promising data from the deiodinated amiodarone analog, dronedarone, and further work with celivarone and ATI-2042. In an attempt to minimize ventricular proarrhythmia, atrial selective drugs, such as intravenous vernakalant, have demonstrated efficacy in terminating AF in addition to promising data in suppression recurrences when used orally. Several other atrial selective drugs are being developed by multiple manufacturers. Other novel therapeutic mechanisms, such as drugs that enhance GAP junction conduction, are being developed to achieve more effective drug therapy than is offered by existing compounds. Finally, nonantiarrhythmic drugs, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, high-mobility group coenzyme A enzyme inhibitors and omega-3 fatty acids/fish oil, appear to have a role in suppressing AF in certain patient subtypes. Future studies will clarify the role of these drugs in treating AF.

Dronedarone: an amiodarone analogue.

Of the antiarrhythmic drugs in current use, amiodarone is one of the most effective and is associated with a comparatively low risk of drug-induced pro-arrhythmia, probably due to its multiple pharmacological actions on cardiac ion channels and receptors. However, amiodarone is associated with significant extra-cardiac side effects and this has driven development of amiodarone analogues. These analogues include short acting analogues (e.g., AT-2001) with similar acute effects to amiodarone, the thyroid receptor antagonist KB-130015 and dronedarone. Dronedarone, (SR-33589; Sanofi-Synthelabo), is a non-iodinated amiodarone derivative that inhibits Na +, K + and Ca 2+ currents. It is a potent inhibitor of the acetylcholine-activated K + current from atrial and sinoatrial nodal tissue, and inhibits the rapid delayed rectifier more potently than slow and inward rectifier K + currents and inhibits L-type calcium current. Dronedarone is an antagonist at alpha- and beta-adrenoceptors and unlike amiodarone, has little effect at thyroid receptors. Dronedarone is more potent than amiodarone in inhibiting arrhythmias and death in animal models of ischaemia- and reperfusion-induced arrhythmias. In the Dronedarone Atrial Fibrillation Study After Electrical Cardioversion (DAFNE) clinical trial, dronedarone 800 mg/day appeared to be effective and safe for the prevention of atrial fibrillation relapses after cardioversion. The Antiarrhythmic Trial with Dronedarone in Moderate-to-Severe Congestive Heart Failure Evaluating Morbidity Decrease (ANDROMEDA) trial was stopped due to a potential increased risk of death in the dronedarone group. Trials of dronedarone in the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation and a safety and tolerability study in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator are ongoing. Further experimental and clinical studies are required before we have a definitive answer to whether dronedarone has advantages over amiodarone and other amiodarone analogues.