Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Trials ; 19(1): 390, 2018 Jul 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30016989

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are the second most common gastrointestinal malignancy after colon cancer. Up to 90% of patients with NETs develop liver metastases, which are a major determinant of symptoms and survival. Current guidelines recommend embolotherapy for progressive or symptomatic NET liver metastases, but the optimal technique among bland embolization, lipiodol chemoembolization, and drug-eluting bead chemoembolization remains unknown and controversial. METHODS/DESIGN: A prospective, open-label, multicenter randomized controlled trial will be conducted in patients with progressive or symptomatic unresectable NET liver metastases. Patients will be randomized to treatment with bland embolization, lipiodol chemoembolization, or drug-eluting microsphere chemoembolization, with 60 enrollees per arm. The primary endpoint will be hepatic progression-free survival (HPFS) following initial embolotherapy by RECIST criteria. The sample size is powered to detect an HR of 1.78 for HPFS following chemoembolization compared with bland embolization, which was estimated on the basis of existing retrospective studies. Secondary endpoints include overall progression-free survival, duration of symptom control, quality of life, rate of adverse events, and interval between embolotherapy cycles. Interim safety analyses will be performed at 10 and 30 patients per arm. DISCUSSION: The RETNET trial is a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to determine the optimal embolotherapy technique for NET liver metastases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02724540 . Registered on March 31, 2016.


Asunto(s)
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Embolización Terapéutica , Aceite Etiodizado/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/secundario , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/terapia , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Argentina , Australia , Canadá , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Portadores de Fármacos , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Aceite Etiodizado/efectos adversos , Francia , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Microesferas , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/diagnóstico por imagen , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
2.
Bull Cancer ; 104(5): 407-416, 2017 May.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28477870

RESUMEN

Portal vein embolization consists of occluding a part of the portal venous system in order to achieve the hypertrophy of the non-embolized liver segments. This technique is used during the preoperative period of major liver resection when the future remnant liver (FRL) volume is insufficient, exposing to postoperative liver failure, main cause of death after major hepatectomy. Portal vein embolization indication depends on the FRL, commonly assessed by its volume. Nowadays, FRL function evaluation seems more relevant and can be measured by 99mTc labelled mebrofenin scintigraphy. Portal vein embolization procedure is mostly performed with percutaneous trans-hepatic access by using ultrasonography guidance and consists of embolic agent injection, such as cyanoacrylate, in the targeted portal vein branches with fluoroscopic guidance. It is a safe and well-tolerated technique, with extremely low morbi-mortality. Portal vein embolization leads to sufficient FRL hypertrophy in about 80% of patients, allowing them to undergo surgery from which they were initially rejected. The two main reasons of non-resection are tumor progression (≈15% of cases) and FRL insufficient hypertrophy (≈5% of cases). When portal vein embolization is not enough to obtain adequate FRL regeneration, hepatic vein embolization may potentiate its effect (liver venous deprivation technique).


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Vena Porta , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Compuestos de Anilina , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Cianoacrilatos/administración & dosificación , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Glicina , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía/métodos , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Hipertrofia/etiología , Iminoácidos , Hígado/irrigación sanguínea , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Hígado/patología , Fallo Hepático/mortalidad , Fallo Hepático/prevención & control , Neoplasias Hepáticas/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Regeneración Hepática , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos de Organotecnecio
3.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 40: 44-49, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28161564

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: On November 13, 2015, Paris and Saint-Denis were the targets of terrorist attacks. The Public Hospitals of Paris Organization and the Percy Armed Forces Instruction Hospitals were mobilized to face the mass casualty situation. The objective of this study is to analyze the management of the victims presenting with a nonthoracic vascular trauma (NTVT). METHODS: All the data relating to the victims of NTVT who required a specific vascular open or endovascular treatment were analyzed retrospectively. A 6-month follow-up was obtained for all the patients. RESULTS: Among the 351 wounded, 20 (5.7%) patients had an NTVT and were dispatched in 8 hospitals (11 men of average age 32). NTVTs were gunshots in 17 cases (85%) or due to a handmade bomb in 3 cases (15%). Twelve patients (60%) received cardiopulmonary resuscitation during prehospital care. NTVT affected the limbs (14 cases, 70%) and the abdomen or the small pelvis (6 cases, 30%). All the patients were operated in emergency. Arterial lesions were treated with greater saphenous vein bypasses, by ligation, and/or embolization. Eleven venous lesions were treated by direct repair or ligation. Associated lesions requiring a specific treatment were present in 19 patients (95%) and were primarily osseous, nervous, and abdomino-pelvic. Severe postoperative complications were observed in 9 patients (45%). Fourteen patients (70%) required blood transfusion (6.4 U of packed red blood cells on average, range 0-48). There were no deaths or amputation and all vascular reconstructions were patent at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of the prehospital emergency services and a multisite and multidisciplinary management made it possible to obtain satisfactory results for NTVT casualties. All the departments of vascular surgery must be prepared to receive many wounded victims in the event of terrorist attacks.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión/terapia , Bombas (Dispositivos Explosivos) , Embolización Terapéutica , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Sustancias Explosivas , Terrorismo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/terapia , Adulto , Traumatismos por Explosión/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos por Explosión/etiología , Traumatismos por Explosión/fisiopatología , Transfusión Sanguínea , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Urgencias Médicas , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Ligadura , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paris , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vena Safena/trasplante , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/fisiopatología , Adulto Joven
4.
Pancreas ; 44(6): 953-8, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25906453

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We summarized a single center's evolution in the management of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) from surgical toward endovascular management. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2013, 337 patients underwent Whipple procedures. Using the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) consensus definition, patients with PPH were identified and retrospectively analyzed for the presentation of hemorrhage, type of intervention, and 90-day mortality outcome measures. RESULTS: Management evolved from operative intervention alone, to combined operative and on-table angiographic intervention, to endovascular intervention alone. The prevalence of PPH was 3.0%. Delayed PPH occurred with a mean of 13.8 days. On angiography, visceral arteries affected were the gastroduodenal artery, hepatic artery, jejunal branches of the superior mesenteric artery, pancreaticoduodenal artery, and inferior phrenic artery. Ninety-day mortality for PPH was 20%. From early to recent experience, the mortality rate was 100% for operative intervention alone, 25% for combined operative and on-table angiographic intervention, and 0% for endovascular intervention alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our 10-year experience supports current algorithms in the management of PPH. Key considerations include the recognition of the sentinel bleed, the presence of a pancreatic fistula, and the initial operative role of a long gastroduodenal artery stump with radiopaque marker for safe and effective embolization should PPH occur.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica/tendencias , Técnicas Hemostáticas/tendencias , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/cirugía , Radiografía Intervencional/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Angiografía de Substracción Digital/tendencias , California/epidemiología , Vías Clínicas , Difusión de Innovaciones , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Femenino , Técnicas Hemostáticas/efectos adversos , Técnicas Hemostáticas/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatectomía/mortalidad , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/mortalidad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/mortalidad , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 20(9): 2881-6, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23563960

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Resection has been the standard of care for patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Transarterial embolization and percutaneous ablation are alternative therapies often reserved for suboptimal surgical candidates. Here we compare long-term outcomes of patients with solitary HCC treated with resection versus combined embo-ablation. METHODS: We previously reported a retrospective comparison of resection and embo-ablation in 73 patients with solitary HCC<7 cm after a median follow-up of 23 months. This study represents long-term updated follow-up over a median of 134 months. RESULTS: There was no difference in survival among Okuda I patients who underwent resection versus embo-ablation (66 vs 58 months, p=.39). There was no difference between the groups in the rate of distant intrahepatic (p=.35) or metastatic progression (p=.48). Surgical patients experienced more complications (p=.004), longer hospitalizations (p<.001), and were more likely to require hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge (p=.03). CONCLUSION: Over a median follow up of more than 10 years, we found no significant difference in overall survival of Okuda 1 patients with solitary HCC<7 cm who underwent surgical resection versus embo-ablation. Our data suggest that there may be a greater role for primary embo-ablation in the treatment of potentially resectable solitary HCC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Ablación por Catéter/mortalidad , Embolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia Recuperativa , Tasa de Supervivencia
6.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 22(6): 780-6, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21515072

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report clinical experience with radioembolization (RE) plus systemic chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical outcomes were evaluated retrospectively among 19 patients with unresectable liver metastases from CRC who had a good performance status and a low burden of extrahepatic disease (EHD) and were eligible for RE. Most (74%) had disease confined to the liver. Concurrent treatment with 5-fluorourail/leucovorin (n = 7) or 5-fluorourail/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; n = 12) was started 3-4 days before single treatment with RE. RESULTS: Overall response rate according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was 84% (two complete responses and 14 partial responses). Median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 10.4 months and median overall survival (OS) time was 29.4 months. For patients with disease confined to the liver, PFS improved (10.7 mo vs 3.6 mo; P = .09), with significant prolongation of OS (median, 37.8 mo vs 13.4 mo; P = .03) compared with those who had EHD. Nine patients, including three long-term (> 3 y) survivors, remained alive after a median follow-up of 18.6 months. Serious treatment-related toxicities included febrile neutropenia with concurrent FOLFOX treatment, a perforated duodenal ulcer, and one death from hepatic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings confirm the effectiveness of RE plus systemic chemotherapy for metastatic CRC. Patients with liver-confined disease derived the greatest benefit, with median survival times beyond 36 months. Larger datasets from ongoing phase III trials are needed to further define the safety and efficacy of RE in the first-line setting.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Braquiterapia , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Embolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Radioisótopos de Itrio/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Australia , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Braquiterapia/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Leucovorina/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Organoplatinos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Radioisótopos de Itrio/efectos adversos
7.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 15(8 Pt 2): 2514-9, 1988 Aug.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2843115

RESUMEN

The effect of hepatic transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) therapy was evaluated in 153 patients with hepatocellular carcinomas who underwent radical hepatectomy. They were divided into 3 groups. Group A (n = 56) received preoperative TAE using ethiodized oil, cisplatin and gelatin sponge (sandwich therapy). Group B (n = 29) received preoperative TAE using adriamycin + gelatin sponge, ethiodized oil + adriamycin + gelatin sponge or adriamycin + degradable starch microsphere. Group C (n = 68) did not receive TAE preoperatively. The 3-year disease-free survival rates in Group A, B, and C were 56%, 34% and 32%, respectively. The rate was significantly higher in Group A than Group C (p less than 0.05). The 1-year disease-free survival rates after partial hepatectomy were 89% in Group A (n = 22), 53% in Group B (n = 15) and 67% in Group C (n = 22). The 3-year survival rate of these patients in Group A was significantly higher (95%), compared to Group C (70%) (p less than 0.05). Preoperative TAE using ethiodized oil, cisplatin and gelatin sponge (sandwich therapy) was considered a useful therapy for improvement of disease-free survival rates or survival rates after hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinomas.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Embolización Terapéutica , Aceite Etiodizado/administración & dosificación , Esponja de Gelatina Absorbible/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Anciano , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Embolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Femenino , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Preoperatorios
8.
Aust N Z J Surg ; 54(2): 137-40, 1984 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6588952

RESUMEN

The results of 100 consecutive patients undergoing arterial embolectomy at the Royal Brisbane Hospital between 1971 and 1981 are presented. Twenty-two patients died and 18 of these had unsuccessful procedures. Of the 82 patients surviving more than 30 days, 14 had a limb amputated and 12 underwent further vascular surgery. Duration of ischaemia was the most important predictive factor; 75% of cases with an ischaemia time of less than 12 h had a successful outcome whereas only 37% were successful when the ischaemia time exceeded 12 h. Anticoagulation improved the success rate, but resulted in a high incidence of wound haematoma.


Asunto(s)
Arterias/cirugía , Embolización Terapéutica , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Amputación Quirúrgica , Anestesia Local , Arteria Braquial/cirugía , Embolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Extremidades/irrigación sanguínea , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Hematoma/etiología , Heparina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Isquemia/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Reoperación , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA