Effects of contralateral noise on envelope-following responses, auditory-nerve compound action potentials, and otoacoustic emissions measured simultaneously.

This study assessed whether the effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS) are consistent with eliciting the medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex for measurements sensitive to outer hair cell (otoacoustic emissions, OAEs), auditory-nerve (AN; compound action potential, CAP), and brainstem/cortical (envelope-following response, EFR) function. The effects of CAS were evaluated for simultaneous measurement of OAEs, CAPs, and EFRs in participants with normal hearing. Clicks were presented at 40 or 98 Hz in three ipsilateral noise conditions (no noise, 45 dB SPL, and 55 dB SPL). For the no noise condition, CAS suppressed or enhanced EFR amplitudes for 40- and 98-Hz clicks, respectively, while CAS had no significant effect on CAP amplitudes. A follow-up experiment using slower rates (4.4-22.2 Hz) assessed whether this insignificant CAS effect on CAPs was from ipsilateral MOC stimulation or AN adaptation; however, CAS effects remained insignificant despite favorable signal-to-noise ratios. CAS-related enhancements of EFR and CAP amplitudes in ipsilateral noise were not observed, contrary to the anti-masking effect of the MOC reflex. EFR and OAE suppression from CAS were not significantly correlated. Thus, the effects of CAS on EFRs may not be solely mediated by the MOC reflex and may be partially mediated by higher auditory centers.

A Clinically Viable Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Assay Using Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.

OBJECTIVES: The contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) strength may indicate various auditory conditions in humans, but a clinically viable assay and equipment are needed for quick, accurate, and reliable measurements. The first experiment compared an earlier version of the assay, which used a nonlinear-mode chirp stimulus, with a new assay using a linear-mode click stimulus, designed to give reliable MOCR measurements in most normal-hearing ears. The second experiment extended the improved assay on a purpose-built binaural hardware platform that used forward-pressure level (FPL) calibration for both the stimulus and the contralateral MOCR elicitor. DESIGN: Transient-evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) tests were measured with and without a 60-dB SPL MOCR-evoking contralateral broadband noise. The normalized MOCR strength (MOCR%) was derived from the TEOAE responses for each trial pair using the complex pressure difference weighted by the TEOAE magnitude. Experiment 1 compared MOCR% within-subject and across-day using two TEOAE stimuli: nonlinear-mode chirps (50 dB SPL, bandpass 1-5 kHz, 14 ms window delayed by 2 ms) and linear-mode clicks (50 dB SPL, bandpass 0.5-2.5 kHz, 13 ms window delayed by 5 ms). TEOAE responses were analyzed in the 0.5 to 2.5 kHz band. Thirty adult participants with normal hearing (30 ears) completed the study. The TEOAE stimulus was calibrated in situ using spectral flattening, and the contralateral noise was calibrated in a coupler. Twelve TEOAE trial pairs were collected for each participant and condition. Experiment 2 used a purpose-built binaural system. The TEOAE stimuli were linear-mode clicks (50 dB SPL, bandpass 1-3 kHz, 13 ms window delayed by 5 ms), analyzed in the 1 to 3 kHz band over ~12 trial pairs. After a probe refit, an additional trial pair was collected for the two early-stopping signal-to-noise ratio criteria (15 and 20 dB). They were evaluated for single-trial reliability and test time. Nineteen adult participants with normal hearing (38 ears) completed the study. The TEOAE clicks and contralateral elicitor noise were calibrated in situ using FPL and delivered with automated timing. RESULTS: MOCR% for linear-mode clicks was distinguishable from measurement variability in 98% to 100% of participants' ears (both experiments), compared with only 73% for the nonlinear-mode chirp (experiment 1). MOCR detectability was assessed using the MOCR% across-subject/within-subject variance ratio. The ratio in experiment 1 for linear-mode clicks was higher (8.0) than for nonlinear-mode chirps (6.4). The ratio for linear-mode clicks (8.9) in experiment 2 was slightly higher than for the comparable linear-mode stimulus (8.0) in experiment 1. TEOAEs showed excellent reliability with high signal-to-noise ratios in both experiments, but reliability was higher for linear-mode clicks than nonlinear-mode chirps. MOCR reliability for the two stimuli was comparable. The FPL pressure response retest reliability derived from the SPL at the microphone was higher than the SPL retest reliability across 0.4 to 8 kHz. Stable results required 2 to 3 trial pairs for the linear-mode click (experiments 1 and 2) and three for the nonlinear-mode chirp (experiment 1), taking around 2 min on average. CONCLUSIONS: The linear-mode click assay produced measurable, reliable, and stable TEOAE and MOCR results on both hardware platforms in around 2 min per ear. The stimulus design and response window ensured that any stimulus artifact in linear mode was unlikely to confound the results. The refined assay is ready to produce high-quality data quickly for clinical and field studies to develop population norms, recognize diagnostic patterns, and determine risk profiles.

Deep Learning Models for Predicting Hearing Thresholds Based on Swept-Tone Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to develop deep learning (DL) models for the quantitative prediction of hearing thresholds based on stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) evoked by swept tones. DESIGN: A total of 174 ears with normal hearing and 388 ears with sensorineural hearing loss were studied. SFOAEs in the 0.3 to 4.3 kHz frequency range were recorded using linearly swept tones at a rate of 2 Hz/msec, with stimulus level changing from 40 to 60 dB SPL in 10 dB steps. Four DL models were used to predict hearing thresholds at octave frequencies from 0.5 to 4 kHz. The models-a conventional convolutional neural network (CNN), a hybrid CNN-k-nearest neighbor (KNN), a hybrid CNN-support vector machine (SVM), and a hybrid CNN-random forest (RF)-were individually built for each frequency. The input to the DL models was the measured raw SFOAE amplitude spectra and their corresponding signal to noise ratio spectra. All DL models shared a CNN-based feature self-extractor. They differed in that the conventional CNN utilized a fully connected layer to make the final regression decision, whereas the hybrid CNN-KNN, CNN-SVM, and CNN-RF models were designed by replacing the last fully connected layer of CNN model with a traditional machine learning (ML) regressor, that is, KNN, SVM, and RF, respectively. The model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error and SE averaged over 20 repetitions of 5 × 5 fold nested cross-validation. The performance of the proposed DL models was compared with two types of traditional ML models. RESULTS: The proposed SFOAE-based DL models resulted in an optimal mean absolute error of 5.98, 5.22, 5.51, and 6.06 dB at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, respectively, superior to that obtained by the traditional ML models. The produced SEs were 8.55, 7.27, 7.58, and 7.95 dB at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, respectively. All the DL models outperformed any of the traditional ML models. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed swept-tone SFOAE-based DL models were capable of quantitatively predicting hearing thresholds with satisfactory performance. With DL techniques, the underlying relationship between SFOAEs and hearing thresholds at disparate frequencies was explored and captured, potentially improving the diagnostic value of SFOAEs.

Speech Perception in Noise and Medial Olivocochlear Reflex: Effects of Age, Speech Stimulus, and Response-Related Variables.

PURPOSE: The role of the medial olivocochlear system in speech perception in noise has been debated over the years, with studies showing mixed results. One possible reason for this could be the dependence of this relationship on the parameters used in assessing the speech perception ability (age, stimulus, and response-related variables). METHODS: The current study assessed the influence of the type of speech stimuli (monosyllables, words, and sentences), the signal-to-noise ratio (+5, 0, -5, and -10 dB), the metric used to quantify the speech perception ability (percent-correct, SNR-50, and slope of the psychometric function) and age (young vs old) on the relationship between medial olivocochlear reflex (quantified by contralateral inhibition of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions) and speech perception in noise. RESULTS: A linear mixed-effects model revealed no significant contributions of the medial olivocochlear reflex to speech perception in noise. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that there was no evidence of any modulatory influence of the indirectly measured medial olivocochlear reflex strength on speech perception in noise.

Enhanced suppression of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Dopamine depletion affects several aspects of hearing function. Previous work [Wu, Yi, Manca, Javaid, Lauer, and Glowatzki, eLife 9, e52419 (2020)] demonstrated the role of dopamine in reducing the firing rates of inner ear cells, which is thought to decrease synaptic excitotoxicity. Thus, a lack of dopamine could indirectly increase acoustic stimulation of medial olivocochlear efferents. To investigate that, here we studied contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in a population of Parkinsonian patients, compared to an age-matched control group, both audiometrically tested. To rule out activation of the acoustic reflex, middle ear impedance was monitored during testing. The results show significantly stronger contralateral suppression in the patient group.

Model-based prediction of otoacoustic emission level, noise level, and signal-to-noise ratio during time-synchronous averaging.

Although averaging is effective in reducing noise, its efficiency rapidly decreases beyond several hundred averages. Depending on environmental and patient noise levels, several hundred averages may be insufficient for informed clinical decision making. The predictable nature of the otoacoustic emission (OAE) and noise during time-synchronous averaging implicates the use of predictive modeling as an alternative to increased averaging when noise is high. Click-evoked OAEs were measured in 98, normal-hearing subjects. Average OAE and noise levels were calculated for subsets of the total number of averages and then fit using variants of a power function. The accuracy of the models was quantified as the difference between the measured value and model output. Models were used to predict the OAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for a criterion noise level. Based on predictions, the OAE was categorized as present or absent. Model-based decisions were compared to decisions from direct measurements. Model accuracy improved as the number of averages (and SNR in the case of OAEs) from which the model was derived increased. Model-based classifications permitted correct categorization of the OAE status from fewer averages than measurement-based classifications. Furthermore, model-based predictions resulted in fewer false positives (i.e., absent OAE despite normal hearing).

Characterizing a Joint Reflection-Distortion OAE Profile in Humans With Endolymphatic Hydrops.

OBJECTIVES: Endolymphatic hydrops (EH), a hallmark of Meniere disease, is an inner-ear disorder where the membranes bounding the scala media are distended outward due to an abnormally increased volume of endolymph. In this study, we characterize the joint-otoacoustic emission (OAE) profile, a results profile including both distortion- and reflection-class emissions from the same ear, in individuals with EH and speculate on its potential utility in clinical assessment and monitoring. DESIGN: Subjects were 16 adults with diagnosed EH and 18 adults with normal hearing (N) matched for age. Both the cubic distortion product (DP) OAE, a distortion-type emission, and the stimulus-frequency (SF) OAE, a reflection-type emission, were measured and analyzed as a joint OAE profile. OAE level, level growth (input/output functions), and phase-gradient delays were measured at frequencies corresponding to the apical half of the human cochlea and compared between groups. RESULTS: Normal hearers and individuals with EH shared some common OAE patterns, such as the reflection emissions being generally higher in level than distortion emissions and showing more linear growth than the more strongly compressed distortion emissions. However, significant differences were noted between the EH and N groups as well. OAE source strength (a metric based on OAE amplitude re: stimulus level) was significantly reduced, as was OAE level, at low frequencies in the EH group. These reductions were more marked for distortion than reflection emissions. Furthermore, two significant changes in the configuration of OAE input/output functions were observed in ears with EH: a steepened growth slope for reflection emissions and an elevated compression knee for distortion emissions. SFOAE phase-gradient delays at 40 dB forward-pressure level were slightly shorter in the group with EH compared with the normal group. CONCLUSIONS: The underlying pathology associated with EH impacts the generation of both emission types, reflection and distortion, as shown by significant group differences in OAE level, growth, and delay. However, hydrops impacts reflection and distortion emissions differently. Most notably, DPOAEs were more reduced by EH than were SFOAEs, suggesting that pathologies associated with the hydropic state do not act identically on the generation of nonlinear distortion at the hair bundle and intracochlear reflection emissions near the peak of the traveling wave. This differential effect underscores the value of applying a joint OAE approach to access both intracochlear generation processes concurrently.

The effects of broadband elicitor duration on a psychoacoustic measure of cochlear gain reduction.

Physiological and psychoacoustic studies of the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) in humans have often relied on long duration elicitors (>100 ms). This is largely due to previous research using otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) that found multiple MOCR time constants, including time constants in the 100s of milliseconds, when elicited by broadband noise. However, the effect of the duration of a broadband noise elicitor on similar psychoacoustic tasks is currently unknown. The current study measured the effects of ipsilateral broadband noise elicitor duration on psychoacoustic gain reduction estimated from a forward-masking paradigm. Analysis showed that both masker type and elicitor duration were significant main effects, but no interaction was found. Gain reduction time constants were ∼46 ms for the masker present condition and ∼78 ms for the masker absent condition (ranging from ∼29 to 172 ms), both similar to the fast time constants reported in the OAE literature (70-100 ms). Maximum gain reduction was seen for elicitor durations of ∼200 ms. This is longer than the 50-ms duration which was found to produce maximum gain reduction with a tonal on-frequency elicitor. Future studies of gain reduction may use 150-200 ms broadband elicitors to maximally or near-maximally stimulate the MOCR.

Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Strength in Ears With Low-to-Moderate Annual Noise Exposure.

PURPOSE: Studies in lower mammals demonstrate enhancement of the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) following noise exposure. A similar effect may occur in humans, and there is some evidence of an individual's acoustic history affecting the MOCR. The current work evaluates the relationship between an individual's annual noise exposure history and their MOCR strength. Given the potential role of the MOCR as a biological hearing protector, it is important to identify factors associated with MOCR strength. METHOD: Data were collected from 98 normal-hearing young adults. Annual noise exposure history was estimated using the Noise Exposure Questionnaire. MOCR strength was assayed using click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) measured with and without noise presented to the contralateral ear. MOCR metrics included the MOCR-induced otoacoustic emission (OAE) magnitude shift and phase shift. A CEOAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of at least 12 dB was required for estimation of the MOCR metrics. Linear regression was applied to evaluate the relationship between MOCR metrics and annual noise exposure. RESULTS: Annual noise exposure was not a statistically significant predictor of the MOCR-induced CEOAE magnitude shift. However, annual noise exposure was a statistically significant predictor of the MOCR-induced CEOAE phase shift-the MOCR-induced phase shift decreased with increasing noise exposure. Additionally, annual noise exposure was a statistically significant predictor of OAE level. CONCLUSIONS: Findings contrast with recent work that suggests MOCR strength increases with annual noise exposure. Compared with previous work, data for this study were collected using more stringent SNR criteria, which is expected to increase the precision of the MOCR metrics. Additionally, data were collected for a larger subject population with a wider range of noise exposures. Whether findings generalize to other exposure durations and levels is unknown and requires future study.

Inter-Subject Variability in the Dependence of Medial-Olivocochlear Reflex Strength on Noise Bandwidth.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to quantify inter-subject variability in the dependence of the medial-olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) on noise bandwidth. Of specific interest was whether inter-subject variability in MOCR dependence on bandwidth explained variability in the MOCR response elicited by wideband noise. DESIGN: Thirty-two young adults with normal hearing participated in the study. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions were measured in the ipsilateral ear with and without noise presented in the contralateral ear. Presentation of contralateral noise served to activate the MOCR. The MOCR was activated using five different noise stimuli with bandwidths ranging from 1- to 5-octaves wide (center frequency of 2 kHz; bandwidth incremented in 1-octave steps). Noise spectral levels (19.6 dB SPL/Hz) were held constant across all bandwidths. MOCR metrics included the normalized-percent change in the otoacoustic emission (OAE), the MOCR-induced OAE magnitude shift, and the MOCR-induced OAE phase shift. Linear mixed-effect models were fit to model the dependence of MOCR-induced OAE magnitude and phase changes on noise bandwidth. The use of a mixed-effect modeling approach allowed for the estimation of subject-specific model parameters that capture on- and off-frequency contributions to the MOCR effects. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive capacity of subject-specific model parameters on the MOCR response elicited by wideband noise. RESULTS: All OAE-based MOCR metrics increased as the noise bandwidth increased from 1- to 5-octaves wide. The dependence of MOCR-induced OAE magnitude and phase shifts on activator bandwidth was well approximated using a linear model with intercept and slope terms. On average, MOCR-induced magnitude and phase shifts increased at a rate of 0.3 dB/octave and 0.01 cycles/octave, respectively, as bandwidth extended beyond the predicted region of OAE generation. A statistically significant random effect of subject was found for both the intercept and slope parameter of each model. Subject-specific slope estimates were statistically significant predictors of a repeated measure of the wideband MOCR response. A higher slope was predictive of larger wideband MOCR effects. CONCLUSIONS: MOCR-induced changes to the OAE are greatest when the MOCR is elicited using wideband noise. Variability in the process of spectral integration within the MOCR pathway appears to explain, in part, inter-subject variability in OAE-based estimates of the MOCR response elicited by wideband noise.

Lack of correlation between medial olivocochlear reflex strength and sentence recognition in noise.

OBJECTIVE: The medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex provides unmasking of sounds in noise, but its contribution to speech-in-noise perception remains unclear due to conflicting results. This study determined associations between MOC reflex strength and sentence recognition in noise in individuals with normal hearing. DESIGN: MOC reflex strength was assessed using contralateral inhibition of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs). Scores on the AzBio sentence task were quantified at three signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Additionally, slope and threshold of the psychometric function were computed. Associations between MOC reflex strength and speech-in-noise outcomes were assessed using Spearman rank correlations. STUDY SAMPLE: Nineteen young adults with normal hearing participated, with data from 17 individuals (mean age = 21.8 years) included in the analysis. RESULTS: Contralateral noise significantly decreased the amplitude of TEOAEs. A range of contralateral inhibition values was exhibited across participants. Scores increased significantly with increasing SNR. Contrary to hypotheses, there were no significant correlations between MOC reflex strength and score, nor were there any significant correlations between MOC reflex strength and measures of the psychometric function. CONCLUSIONS: Results found no significant monotonic relationship between MOC reflex strength and sentence recognition in noise. Future work is needed to determine the functional role of the MOC reflex.

Visual attention does not affect the reliability of otoacoustic emission or medial olivocochlear reflex.

This study investigated whether visual attention affects the reliability (i.e., repeatability) of transiently evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) magnitudes or of medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) estimates. TEOAEs were measured during three visual attentional conditions: control (subject were seated with eyes closed); passive (subjects looked at a pattern of squares on a computer screen); and active (subjects silently counted an occasionally inverted pattern). To estimate reliability, the whole recording session was repeated the next day. The results showed that visual attention does not significantly affect TEOAE or MOCR magnitudes-or their reliability. It is therefore possible to employ visual stimuli (e.g., watching a silent movie) during TEOAE experiments, a procedure sometimes used during testing to prevent subjects from falling asleep or to keep children still and quiet.

Medial olivocochlear reflex reliability: The effects of averaging and presence of synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

The medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR), usually assessed by the inhibition of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) with contralateral noise, is a very small effect. In understanding the origin of the MOCR, it is crucial to obtain data of the highest accuracy, i.e., with a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which in turn largely depends on the number of signal averages. This study investigates how the reliability of MOCR measures is affected by the number of averages. At the same time, the effect of the presence of synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SSOAEs) is taken into account, as it is known that this factor significantly affects TEOAE amplitudes and SNRs. Each recording session consisted of two series of four measurements, allowing comparison of MOCR magnitude based on 250, 500, 750, and 1000 averages. Reliability was based on comparing the two series. The results show that, for a good quality MOCR measure (i.e., intraclass correlation above 0.9), the required number of averages is at least double that obtainable from a standard TEOAE test (i.e., 500 compared to 250). Ears without SSOAEs needed a higher number of averages to reach a correlation of 0.9 than ears with SSOAEs.

Evaluation of Medial Olivocochlear Neural Efferent Pathway in Tinnitus Perception in Normal-hearing Individuals.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate a possible role of the Medial Olivocochlear (MOC) efferent neural pathway and neural connections responsible for tinnitus generation in silence/sensory deprivation. DESIGN: By placing normal hearing participants in a sound booth for 10 minutes, silence/sensory deprivation was created. This offered assessment of MOC neural pathway in normal hearing participants in silence. Hyperactivity of MOC neural pathway was assessed by its more suppressive effect on Transient Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAEs) in silence. The required auditory measurements were recorded in the sound booth using recommended diagnostic protocols to ensure the effect of 'only silence' on auditory structures. TEOAE were recorded from the right ear and suppression was measured by placing noise in the left ear. Fifty-eight normal hearing male individuals between age 18-35 years were recruited as participants in this study. RESULTS: Approximately, forty-one percent of the participants perceived some type of tinnitus during/after 10 minutes of silence. No statistically significant difference was found in the total TEOAE amplitude and TEOAE suppression amplitude before and after ten minutes of silence. Post silence total TEOAE suppression between tinnitus perceiving and non-perceiving tinnitus participants were not statistically significantly different. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the medial olivocochlear efferent pathway or lower brain stem area does not appear to play a role in the emergence of temporary tinnitus in silence however indicate the involvement of higher central auditory nervous system structures in perception of the tinnitus which support the well-accepted notion that tinnitus is the central auditory processing phenomenon.

Characterizing the Relationship Between Reflection and Distortion Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Adults.

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) arise from one (or a combination) of two basic generation mechanisms in the cochlea: nonlinear distortion and linear reflection. As a result of having distinct generation processes, these two classes of emissions may provide non-redundant information about hair-cell integrity and show distinct sensitivities to cochlear pathology. Here, we characterize the relationship between reflection and distortion emissions in normal hearers across a broad frequency and stimulus-level space using novel analysis techniques. Furthermore, we illustrate the promise of this approach in a small group of individuals with mild-moderate hearing loss. A "joint-OAE profile" was created by measuring interleaved swept-tone stimulus-frequency OAEs (SFOAEs) and 2f1-f2 distortion-product OAEs (DPOAEs) in the same ears using well-considered parameters. OAE spectra and input/output functions were calculated across five octaves. Using our specific recording protocol and analysis scheme, SFOAEs in normal hearers had higher levels than did DPOAEs, with the most pronounced differences occurring at the highest stimulus levels. Also, SFOAE compression occurred at higher stimulus levels (than did DPOAE compression) and its growth in the compressed region was steeper. The diagnostic implications of these findings and the influence of the measurement protocol on both OAEs (and on their relationship) are discussed.

Evaluation of the efferent auditory system in COVID-19 adult patients.

BACKGROUND: The short- and long-term effects of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on the medial olivocochlear reflex and outer hair cells in the cochlea remain largely unclear. AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the efferent auditory system effects in adult patients with COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 18-50 years old 44 volunteers: 26 individuals (52 ears) with COVID-19 in the study group and 18 healthy individuals (36 ears) in the control group. Otolaryngological examination, immitancemetric evaluation, distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE), contralateral acoustic stimulation with DPOAE, audiometric evaluation, and high frequency audiometric evaluation were performed in all individuals participating in the study. RESULTS: In our study, patients with COVID-19 had significantly lower DPOAE results with or without broadband noise at only 6 kHz frequency and contralateral suppression results at all frequencies compared to healthy individuals. A statistically significant difference was found between the study and control groups according to whether the participants had a response in the high frequency audiometry at 12 and 16 kHz frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 affects many systems in the body. As a result of the findings obtained in the present study, it is shown that the auditory efferent system may also be affected.

Standardization of the TEOAE Contralateral Suppression Test in Terms of Stimulus Intensity and Contralateral Noise Duration in Individuals with Normal Hearing.

BACKGROUND: A standard method and parameter study were performed for the contralateral suppression test. PURPOSE: Our study aimed to determine the contralateral transient-evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) suppression test method and stimulus-noise parameters that have a standard procedure and will enable the efferent system to be easily evaluated in clinics. RESEARCH DESIGN: This study was conducted in two parts with two different groups of participants as a within-subjects design. In the first part, the signal-to-noise ratio at which maximum suppression obtained was investigated with 29 participants. In the second part, the optimal contralateral noise presentation method (in terms of noise-time or noise-sweep) was examined with 21 participants. STUDY SAMPLE: In the first part 29 young adults aged between 18 and 32 (23.03 ± 2.84), 20 females and 9 males, and in the second part 21 young adults aged between 19 and 34 years (mean age: 23.71 ± 3.48 years), 16 females and 5 males, participated in the second part. All participants had normal hearing. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: To obtain maximum OAE suppression, different parameters were tested with the Otodynamics ILO292-II OAE device at both parts of the study in a double-walled audiometric test booths. Multirepeated analysis of variance, pairwise comparison, Friedman test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In the first part, maximum suppression was achieved at 65 dB peSPL (decibel peak-equivalent sound pressure level) TEOAE stimulus and 65 dB SPL broadband noise. In the second part, maximum suppression was obtained in noise-time method with 30 seconds "duration." CONCLUSIONS: To provide standardization in clinics, it can be recommended that the contralateral suppression of OAEs was measured at 65 dB peSPL TEOAE stimulus and 65 dB SPL broadband noise in the linear stimulation mode with Otodynamics ILO 292-II double-probe OAE device. To obtain maximum suppression, the noise-time method with 30 seconds duration can be used.

Relationship between irregularities in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions suppression and psychophysical tuning curves.

The suppression of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) allows the objective evaluation of cochlear frequency selectivity by determining the suppression tuning curve (STC). Interestingly, some STCs have additional sidelobes at the high frequency flank, which are thought to result from interaction between the probe tone and the cochlear standing wave corresponding to the SOAE being suppressed. Sidelobes are often in regions of other neighboring SOAEs but can also occur in the absence of any other SOAE. The aim of this study was to compare STCs and psychoacoustic tuning curves (PTCs). Therefore, STCs and PTCs were measured in: (1) subjects in which the STC had a sidelobe, and (2) subjects without STC sidelobes. Additionally, PTCs were measured in subjects without SOAEs. Across participant groups, the quality factor Q10dB of the PTCs was similar, independently from whether SOAEs were present or absent. Thus, the presence of an SOAE does not provide enhanced frequency selectivity at the emission frequency. Moreover, both PTC and STC show irregularities, but these are not related in a straightforward way. This suggests that different mechanisms cause these irregularities.

Expectations of the timing and intensity of a stimulus propagate to the auditory periphery through the medial olivocochlear reflex.

Expectations concerning the timing of a stimulus enhance attention at the time at which the event occurs, which confers significant sensory and behavioral benefits. Herein, we show that temporal expectations modulate even the sensory transduction in the auditory periphery via the descending pathway. We measured the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR), a sound-activated efferent feedback that controls outer hair cell motility and optimizes the dynamic range of the sensory system. MOCR was noninvasively assessed using otoacoustic emissions. We found that the MOCR was enhanced by a visual cue presented at a fixed interval before a sound but was unaffected if the interval was changing between trials. The MOCR was also observed to be stronger when the learned timing expectation matched with the timing of the sound but remained unvaried when these two factors did not match. This implies that the MOCR can be voluntarily controlled in a stimulus- and goal-directed manner. Moreover, we found that the MOCR was enhanced by the expectation of a strong but not a weak, sound intensity. This asymmetrical enhancement could facilitate antimasking and noise protective effects without disrupting the detection of faint signals. Therefore, the descending pathway conveys temporal and intensity expectations to modulate auditory processing.

The effect of coffee on contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Background: Coffee is a popular non-alcoholic beverage consumed by humans across the world. It contains caffeine, which is a type of stimulant of the central nervous system. In the auditory system, it has a positive effect on auditory brainstem response and perception of speech in noise. Further, caffeine has an inhibitory effect in the cochlea, but studies have rarely investigated its effect on otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) in humans. OAEs are low-intensity sounds produced by the cochlea, which could be recorded in the ear canal. The present study was carried out to investigate the effect of coffee on transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) and contralateral suppression of TEOAE. Method: A total of 52 young adults participated in the study. A cross-over study design was used for the present investigation. The TEOAE and contralateral suppression of TEOAE were recorded before and after consumption of coffee and milk. The contralateral suppression of TEOAE was measured by presenting white noise to the contralateral ear at 40, 50, and 60 dB sound pressure level (SPL). Results: The mean amplitude of TEOAE before and after consumption of coffee was similar in both ears. Further, the mean contralateral suppression of TEOAE was slightly larger after consumption of coffee in both ears. However, the mean difference was not significant in both the ears. Conclusions: Based on the findings of present study, coffee has no significant effect on the amplitude of TEOAE and contralateral suppression of TEOAE.