Effects of different lipid emulsions on serum adipokines, inflammatory markers and mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis: A prospective observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Intravenous lipid emulsions in parenteral nutrition may cause different metabolic responses and immune effects in critically ill patients with sepsis. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different lipid emulsions on changes in concentrations of adipokine and cytokine and their relationship with mortality in patients. METHODS: Patients enrolled in this prospective, single-center, observational cohort study, were estimated to require more than ten days of parenteral nutrition. They were treated with soybean oil-based or olive oil-based parenteral lipid emulsions. Adipokine and cytokine concentrations of septic patients were determined at enrollment and ten days after, in accordance with the diagnostic criteria of SEPSIS-3. The concentrations levels were measured in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Mortality was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regressions. RESULTS: Over a 25-month period, 145 patients were assessed for eligibility and consequently, 40 patients were analyzed. On admission, both groups had comparable physiological scores, comorbidities, malnutrition risk, anthropometric measurements, metabolic/hematologic biomarkers and concentrations of adipokines and cytokines (p > .05). Serum leptin, resistin, and cytokines (IL-6, IL-10, IL-1ß and TNF-α) decreased significantly in the entire cohort over ten days following sepsis (p < .05). Serum resistin decreased in both olive oil-based and soybean oil-based lipid emulsions groups. Serum adiponectin only decreased in soybean oil-based lipid emulsions group (p < .05). There was association between survival and percentage changes in adiponectin, resistin and visfatin concentrations (log rank test: p < .05). CONCLUSION: Adipokine and cytokine responses are affected by medical nutritional therapy in the sepsis process and adipokines may represent functional prognostic biomarkers in critically ill patients with sepsis.

The effect of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on clinical and biochemical parameters of critically ill patients with COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n3-PUFAs) may exert beneficial effects on the immune system of patients with viral infections. This paper aimed to examine the effect of n3-PUFA supplementation on inflammatory and biochemical markers in critically ill patients with COVID-19. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 128 critically ill patients infected with COVID-19 who were randomly assigned to the intervention (fortified formula with n3-PUFA) (n = 42) and control (n = 86) groups. Data on 1 month survival rate, blood glucose, sodium (Na), potassium (K), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), albumin, hematocrit (HCT), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), mean arterial pressure (MAP), O2 saturation (O2sat), arterial pH, partial pressure of oxygen (PO2), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2), bicarbonate (HCO3), base excess (Be), white blood cells (WBCs), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), hemoglobin (Hb), platelet (Plt), and the partial thromboplastin time (PTT) were collected at baseline and after 14 days of the intervention. RESULTS: The intervention group had significantly higher 1-month survival rate and higher levels of arterial pH, HCO3, and Be and lower levels of BUN, Cr, and K compared with the control group after intervention (all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between blood glucose, Na, HCT, Ca, P, MAP, O2sat, PO2, PCO2, WBCs, GCS, Hb, Plt, PTT, and albumin between two groups. CONCLUSION: Omega-3 supplementation improved the levels of several parameters of respiratory and renal function in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Further clinical studies are warranted. Trial registry Name of the registry: This study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT); Trial registration number: IRCT20151226025699N3; Date of registration: 2020.5.20; URL of trial registry record: https://en.irct.ir/trial/48213.

Vitamin D status was associated with sepsis in critically ill children: A PRISMA compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis leads to the high mortality in critically ill infants and children. It is still controversial whether vitamin D deficiency was associated with the incidence of sepsis. Thus we designed the systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The Ovid Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane library were systematically searched until April 5, 2020. The 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) level was recorded and set 20 ng/mL as cut-off in cohort study to divide the lower and higher 25-OHD group. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for comparing the impact of vitamin D deficiency on the incidence of sepsis in critically ill children. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies were included with 17 case-control studies and 10 cohort studies. In those case-control studies, the maternal 25-OHD level and neonatal 25-OHD level in sepsis group was significant lower than non-sepsis group (P < .001). The percentage of severe vitamin D deficiency was significant higher in sepsis group comparing to non-sepsis group (odds ratio [OR] = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.13-6.25, P < .001). In those cohort studies, the incidence of sepsis in lower 25-OHD group was 30.4% comparing with 18.2% in higher 25-OHD level group. However, no statistical significant difference in terms of mechanical ventilation rate and 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that critically ill infants and children with sepsis could have a lower 25-OHD level and severe vitamin D deficiency comparing to those without sepsis. Future studies should focus on the association of vitamin D supplement and the occurrence of sepsis in critically ill children.

[Effectiveness and safety of two lipid emulsions for parenteral nutrition in postsurgical critically ill patients: Clinoleic® versus SMOFlipid®]. / Eficacia y seguridad de dos emulsiones lipídicas de nutrición parenteral en pacientes críticos posquirúrgicos: Clinoleic® frente a SMOFlipid®.

INTRODUCTION: Introduction: a lipid emulsion (LE) may result in different immunomodulatory effects depending on its fatty acid composition. LEs enriched with fish oil and those based on olive oil (OOBE) have shown advantages over those derived from soybean oil, although very few studies have compared these with each other, and none was performed in critically ill surgical patients. Objectives: to demonstrate non-inferiority for the therapeutic efficacy of SMOFlipid® (enriched with fish oil) versus Clinoleic® (OOBE) in relation to the occurrence of nosocomial infection and other evolutionary parameters. To demonstrate non-inferiority in the safety profile of SMOFlipid® versus Clinoleic® in terms of mortality and adverse events. Material and method: a phase-III, non-inferiority clinical trial performed in critically ill postsurgical patients. The subjects were randomized to receive SMOFlipid® or Clinoleic®. For comparison of qualitative variables case frequencies and percentages were obtained using the Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Means were compared between groups using Student's t-test. A p-value lower than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Farrington-Manning, Miettinen-Nurminen, and Gart-Nam tests were applied in the main non-inferiority analysis of the primary endpoint. Results: during de inclusion period 73 patients were selected, 37 of whom received Clinoleic® and 36 SMOFlipid®. Regarding the variable "decrease in nosocomial infections", SMOFlipid® proved to be non-inferior to Clinoleic®. Regarding the main variable "mortality", SMOFlipid® proved to be non-inferior to Clinoleic®. There were no statistically significant differences in the occurrence of adverse effects either. Conclusions: in our study, SMOFlipid® proved to be non-inferior to Clinoleic® in terms of efficacy and safety.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: las emulsiones lipídicas (EL) pueden asociar distintos efectos inmunomoduladores dependiendo de su composición de ácidos grasos. Las EL enriquecidas con aceite de pescado y las basadas en aceite de oliva (EBAO) han mostrado ventajas frente a las derivados del aceite de soja, aunque son muy escasos los estudios que las comparan entre sí y no existe ninguno en pacientes críticos quirúrgicos. Objetivos: Demostrar la no inferioridad de la eficacia terapéutica de SMOFlipid® (enriquecida con aceite de pescado) frente a Clinoleic® (EBAO) en relación con la aparición de infecciones nosocomiales y otros parámetros evolutivos. Demostrar la no inferioridad de la seguridad de SMOFlipid® frente a Clinoleic® expresada como aparición de mortalidad y acontecimientos adversos. Material y método: ensayo clínico de fase III, de no inferioridad, realizado en pacientes críticos posquirúrgicos. Los sujetos se aleatorizaron para recibir SMOFlipid® o Clinoleic®. Para comparar variables cualitativas se obtuvieron la frecuencia y el porcentaje de casos, realizando la prueba del chi cuadrado o el test de Fisher. Las medias entre dos grupos se compararon empleando el test de la "t" de Student. Se consideró estadísticamente significativo un valor de p menor de 0,05. Para el análisis principal de no inferioridad de la variable principal se aplicaron los test de Farrington-Manning, Miettinen-Nurminen y Gart-Nam. Resultados: se incluyeron 73 pacientes, de los cuales 37 recibieron Clinoleic® y 36 SMOFlipid®. En la variable "disminución de infecciones nosocomiales", SMOFlipid® demostró no ser inferior a Clinoleic®. En la variable principal "mortalidad", SMOFlipid® demostró no ser inferior a Clinoleic®. Tampoco existieron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en cuanto a la aparición de efectos adversos. Conclusiones: en nuestro estudio, SMOFlipid® demostró no ser inferior a Clinoleic® en términos de eficacia y seguridad.

Nutritional risk and therapy for severe and critical COVID-19 patients: A multicenter retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the nutritional risk and therapy in severe and critical patients with COVID-19. METHODS: A total of 523 patients enrolled from four hospitals in Wuhan, China. The inclusion time was from January 2, 2020 to February 15. Clinical characteristics and laboratory values were obtained from electronic medical records, nursing records, and related examinations. RESULTS: Of these patients, 211 (40.3%) were admitted to the ICU and 115 deaths (22.0%). Patients admitted to the ICU had lower BMI and plasma protein levels. The median Nutrition risk in critically ill (NUTRIC) score of 211 patients in the ICU was 5 (4, 6) and Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) score was 5 (3, 6). The ratio of parenteral nutrition (PN) therapy in non-survivors was greater than that in survivors, and the time to start nutrition therapy was later than that in survivors. The NUTRIC score can independently predict the risk of death in the hospital (OR = 1.197, 95%CI: 1.091-1.445, p = 0.006) and high NRS score patients have a higher risk of poor outcome in the ICU (OR = 1.880, 95%CI: 1.151-3.070, p = 0.012). After adjusted age and sex, for each standard deviation increase in BMI, the risk of in-hospital death was reduced by 13% (HR = 0.871, 95%CI: 0.795-0.955, p = 0.003), and the risk of ICU transfer was reduced by 7% (HR = 0.932, 95%CI:0.885-0.981, p = 0.007). The in-hospital survival time of patients with albumin level ≤35 g/L was significantly decreased (15.9 d, 95% CI: 13.7-16.3, vs 24.2 d, 95% CI: 22.3-29.7, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Severe and critical patients with COVID-19 have a high risk of malnutrition. Low BMI and protein levels were significantly associated with adverse events. Early nutritional risk screening and therapy for patients with COVID-19 are necessary.

Association between ultrasound quadriceps muscle status with premorbid functional status and 60-day mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill patient: A single-center prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In critically ill patients, direct measurement of skeletal muscle using bedside ultrasound (US) may identify a patient population that might benefit more from optimal nutrition practices. When US is not available, survey measures of nutrition risk and functional status that are associated with muscle status may be used to identify patients with low muscularity. This study aims to determine the association between baseline and changing ultrasound quadriceps muscle status with premorbid functional status and 60-day mortality. METHODS: This single-center prospective observational study was conducted in a general ICU. Mechanically ventilated critically ill adult patients (age ≥18 years) without pre-existing systemic neuromuscular diseases and expected to stay for ≥96 h in the ICU were included. US measurements were performed within 48 h of ICU admission (baseline), at day 7, day 14 of ICU stay and at ICU discharge (if stay >14 days). Quadriceps muscle layer thickness (QMLT), rectus femoris cross sectional area (RFCSA), vastus intermedius pennation angle (PA) and fascicle length (FL), and rectus femoris echogenicity (mean and standard deviation [SD]) were measured. Patients' next-of-kin were interviewed by using established questionnaires for their pre-hospitalization nutritional risk (nutrition risk screening-2002) and functional status (SARC-F, clinical frailty scale [CFS], Katz activities of daily living [ADL] and Lawton Instrumental ADL). RESULTS: Ninety patients were recruited. A total of 86, 53, 24 and 10 US measures were analyzed, which were performed at a median of 1, 7, 14 and 22 days from ICU admission, respectively. QMLT, RFCSA and PA reduced significantly over time. The overall trend of change of FL was not significant. The only independent predictor of 60-day mortality was the change of QMLT from baseline to day 7 (adjusted odds ratio 0.95 for every 1% less QMLT loss, 95% confidence interval 0.91-0.99; p = 0.02). Baseline measures of high nutrition risk (modified nutrition risk in critically ill ≥5), sarcopenia (SARC-F ≥4) and frailty (CFS ≥5) were associated with lower baseline QMLT, RFCSA and PA and higher 60-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Every 1% loss of QMLT over the first week of critical illness was associated with 5% higher odds of 60-day mortality. SARC-F, CFS and mNUTRIC are associated with quadriceps muscle status and 60-day mortality and may serve as a potential simple and indirect measures of premorbid muscle status at ICU admission.

Mortality associated with new risk classification of developing refeeding syndrome in critically ill patients: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although refeeding syndrome (RFS) has been recognized as a potentially fatal metabolic complication, the definition of RFS has remained unclear. Recently, European researchers suggested an evidence-based and consensus-supported algorithm that consisted of a new RFS risk classification and treatment strategies for medical inpatients. The classification was based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) criteria for patients at risk of developing RFS. In this study, we aimed to investigate the frequency of each applied new risk group and the association between the new classification and mortality in critically ill patients. METHODS: This cohort study was conducted at a Japanese metropolitan tertiary-care university hospital from December 2016 to December 2018. We included critically ill adult patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) via the emergency department and who stayed in the ICU for 24 h or longer. We applied the new risk classification based on the NICE RFS risk factors on ICU admission. The main exposure was risk classification of RFS: no risk, low risk, high risk, or very high risk. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality censored at day 30 after ICU admission. We performed a multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: We analyzed 542 patients who met the eligibility criteria. The prevalence of the four RFS risk classification groups was 25.8% for no risk, 25.7% for low risk, 46.5% for high risk, and 2.0% for very high risk. The 30-day mortality was 5.0%, 7.2%, 16.3%, and 27.3%, respectively (log-rank trend test: p < 0.001). In the multivariable Cox regression, adjusted hazard ratios with no risk group as a reference were 1.28 (95% CI 0.48-3.38) for low risk, 2.81 (95% CI 1.24-6.35) for high risk, and 3.17 (95% CI 0.78-12.91) for very high risk. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half the critically ill patients were categorized as high or very high risk based on the new risk classification. Furthermore, as the risk categories progressed, the 30-day in-hospital mortality increased. Early recognition of patients at risk of developing RFS may improve patient outcomes through timely and optimal nutritional treatment.

Metabolomic basis for response to high dose vitamin D in critical illness.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is unclear if intervention can mitigate the dramatic alterations of metabolic homeostasis present in critical illness. Our objective was to determine the associations between increased 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels following high dose vitamin D3 and more favorable metabolomic profiles in critical illness. METHODS: We performed a post-hoc metabolomics study of the VITdAL-ICU randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Trial patients from Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Units at a tertiary university hospital with 25-hydroxyvitamin D level ≤20 ng/mL received either high dose oral vitamin D3 (540,000 IU) or placebo. We performed an analysis of 578 metabolites from 1215 plasma samples from 428 subjects at randomization (day 0), day 3 and 7. Using mixed-effects modeling, we studied changes in metabolite profiles in subjects receiving intervention or placebo relative to absolute increases in 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels from day 0 to day 3. RESULTS: 55.2% of subjects randomized to high dose vitamin D3 demonstrated an absolute increase in 25-hydroxyvitamin D ≥ 15 ng/ml from day 0 to day 3. With an absolute increase in 25-hydroxyvitamin D ≥ 15 ng/ml, multiple members of the sphingomyelin, plasmalogen, lysoplasmalogen and lysophospholipid metabolite classes had significantly positive Bonferroni corrected associations over time. Further, multiple representatives of the acylcarnitine and phosphatidylethanolamine metabolite classes had significantly negative Bonferroni corrected associations over time with an absolute increase in 25-hydroxyvitamin D ≥ 15 ng/ml. Changes in these highlighted metabolite classes were associated with decreased 28-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Increases in 25-hydroxyvitamin D following vitamin D3 intervention are associated with favorable changes in metabolites involved in endothelial protection, enhanced innate immunity and improved mitochondrial function.

Association between Vitamin D supplementation and mortality in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest that low 25-hydroxyvitamin D status is common and has been associated with higher mortality in critically ill patients. This study aim to investigate whether vitamin D supplementation is associated with lower mortality in critically ill patients. METHOD: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to January 12, 2020, without language restrictions, for randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of vitamin D supplementation with placebo in critically ill patients. Two authors independently performed data extraction and assessed study quality. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up. RESULT: We identified nine trials with a total of 2066 patients. Vitamin D supplementation was not associated with reduced all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.09, I2 = 20%), at 30 days (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.15), at 90 days (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.44), and at 180 days (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.03). Results were similar in the sensitivity analysis. The sample size met the optimum size in trial sequential analysis. Similarly, supplemental vitamin D was not associated with length of ICU stay, hospital stay, or mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSION: Vitamin D supplement was not associated with reduced all-cause mortality in critically ill patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/bgsjq.

Vitamin D supplementation and the outcomes of critically ill adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

This meta-analysis assessed the association between vitamin D supplementation and the outcomes of critically ill adult patients. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase databases until March 21, 2020. We only included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation with placebo in critically ill adult patients. The primary outcome was their 28-day mortality. Overall, 9 RCTs with 1867 patients were included. In the pooled analysis of the 9 RCTs, no significant difference was observed in 28-day mortality between the vitamin D supplementation and placebo groups (20.4% vs 21.7%, OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.46-1.15; I2 = 51%). This result did not change as per the method of vitamin D supplementation (enteral route only: 19.9% vs 18.2%, OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.88-1.57; I2 = 10%; intramuscular or intravenous injection route: 25.6% vs 40.8%, OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.21-1.06; I2 = 19%) or daily dose (high dose: 20.9% vs 19.8%, OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.51-1.36; I2 = 53%; low dose: 15.6% vs 21.3%, OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.32-1.68; I2 = 0%). No significant difference was observed between the vitamin D supplementation and placebo groups regarding the length of ICU stay (standard mean difference [SMD], - 0.30; 95% CI, - 0.61 to 0.01; I2 = 60%), length of hospital stay (SMD, - 0.17; 95% CI, - 041 to 0.08; I2 = 65%), and duration of mechanical ventilation (SMD, - 0.41; 95% CI, - 081 to 0.00; I2 = 72%). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggested that the administration of vitamin D did not provide additional advantages over placebo for critically ill patients. However, additional studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Bringing into focus treatment limitation and DNACPR decisions: How COVID-19 has changed practice.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced further challenges into Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions. Existing evidence suggests success rates for CPR in COVID-19 patients is low and the risk to healthcare professionals from this aerosol-generating procedure complicates the benefit/harm balance of CPR. METHODS: The study is based at a large teaching hospital in the United Kingdom where all DNACPR decisions are documented on an electronic healthcare record (EHR). Data from all DNACPR/TEAL status forms between 1st January 2017 and 30th April 2020 were collected and analysed. We compared patterns of decision making and rates of form completion during the 2-month peak pandemic phase to an analogous period during 2019. RESULTS: A total of 16,007 forms were completed during the study period with a marked increase in form completion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients with a form completed were on average younger and had fewer co-morbidities during the COVID-19 period than in March-April 2019. Several questions on the DNACPR/TEAL forms were answered significantly differently with increases in patients being identified as suitable for CPR (23.8% versus 9.05%; p < 0.001) and full active treatment (30.5% versus 26.1%; p = 0.028). Whilst proportions of discussions that involved the patient remained similar during COVID-19 (95.8% versus 95.6%; p = 0.871), fewer discussions took place with relatives (50.6% versus 75.4%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the emphasis on senior decision making and conversations around ceilings of treatment appears to have changed practice, with a higher proportion of patients having DNACPR/TEAL status documented. Understanding patient preferences around life-sustaining treatment versus comfort care is part of holistic practice and supports shared decision making. It is unclear whether these attitudinal changes will be sustained after COVID-19 admissions decrease.

Effect of Intravenous 25OHD Supplementation on Bone Turnover and Inflammation in Prolonged Critically Ill Patients.

Critically ill patients have low circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD), vitamin D binding protein (DBP), and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D]. Low 25OHD is associated with poor outcomes, possibly explained by its effect on bone and immunity. In this prospective, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we investigated the feasibility of normalizing 25OHD in prolonged (>10 days) critically ill patients and the effects thereof on 1,25(OH)2D, bone metabolism, and innate immunity. Twenty-four patients were included and compared with 24 matched healthy subjects. Patients were randomized to either intravenous bolus of 200 µg 25OHD followed by daily infusion of 15 µg 25OHD for 10 days, or to placebo. Parameters of vitamin D, bone and mineral metabolism, and innate immune function were measured. As safety endpoints, ICU length of stay and mortality were registered. Infusion of 25OHD resulted in a sustained increase of serum 25OHD (from median baseline 9.2 -16.1 ng/ml at day 10), which, however, remained below normal levels. There was no increase in serum 1,25(OH)2D but a slight increase in serum 24,25(OH)2D. Mineral homeostasis, innate immunity and clinical safety endpoints were unaffected. Thus, intravenous 25OHD administration during critical illness increased serum 25OHD concentrations, though less than expected from data in healthy subjects, which suggests illness-induced alterations in 25OHD metabolism and/or increased 25OHD distribution volume. The increased serum 25OHD concentrations were not followed by a rise in 1,25(OH)2D nor were bone metabolism or innate immunity affected, which suggests that low 25OHD and 1,25OHD levels are part of the adaptive response to critical illness.

Protective effect of rhubarb combined with ulinastatin for patients with sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is the leading cause of death in critically ill patients. Ulinastatin (UTI), a protease inhibitor, and rhubarb, used as a traditional Chinese medication, are proved to be effective in treating sepsis, but the effect of the combination therapy of these two drugs on sepsis remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the combination treatment of UTI and rhubarb on sepsis patients. METHODS: A total of 75 septic patients were randomly divided into control group, UTI group, Rhubarb group, and UTI plus Rhubarb group. Clinical data and score of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) were collected; lymphocyte subtypes in the peripheral blood were analyzed before and after the 5-day treatment in the Intensive Care Unit. RESULTS: All the therapeutic interventions (UTI alone, rhubarb alone, or UTI plus rhubarb) significantly reduced the levels of C-Reactive protein, white blood cell density, lactic acid, and APACH II scores, and elevated the levels of CD4/CD8, but only UTI plus rhubarb treatment obviously decreased the level of procalcitonin. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that the combination of UTI and rhubarb may be a promising therapeutic scheme to ameliorate sepsis.

Vitamin D Deficiency Is Highly Prevalent in Critically Ill Patients and a Risk Factor for Mortality: A Prospective Observational Study Comparing Noncirrhotic Patients and Patients With Cirrhosis.

INTRODUCTION: A 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 25(OH)D, deficiency is common among critically ill patients and correlated with increased mortality. Furthermore, deficiency is associated with advanced liver disease. However, there are no studies available comparing the dimensions and consequences of a 25(OH)D deficiency between patients with and without liver cirrhosis in the setting of intensive care units (ICUs). This study focuses on differences in 25(OH)D status between critically ill noncirrhosis patients and patients with cirrhosis (primary end point), hypothesizing that deficiency and its impact on mortality risk are even more pronounced in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of 176 patients (noncirrhosis patients, N = 114; patients with cirrhosis, N = 62) with a laboratory assessment of 25(OH)D on ICU admission and survival analyses after 180 days. RESULTS: On admission, 55% of patients showed a severe deficiency, 25(OH)D <10 ng/mL, and a further 23% moderate deficiency (10-19 ng/mL). The overall median level of 25(OH)D was 8.0 (5.0-18.0) ng/mL (10.5 [6.0-21.3] in noncirrhosis patients vs 7.0 [4.8-10.0] in patients with cirrhosis; P < .001). We found extremely low levels particularly in patients without prior vitamin D supplementation (6.0 [4.0-7.5] in patients with cirrhosis vs 8.0 [5.0-12.0] ng/mL in noncirrhosis patients; P = .004). Vitamin D status correlated inversely with the sequential organ failure assessment, acute and physiology chronic health evaluation, model of end-stage liver disease, and Child-Pugh scores. Survival analyses categorized 25(OH)D levels <10 ng/mL as a high-risk factor for mortality 180 days after admission (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.60-3.70; P < .001). In patients with cirrhosis, a severe deficiency (<10 ng/mL) involved a significantly higher mortality risk than in noncirrhosis patients (HR: 2.30, 95% CI = 1.39-3.82; P = .001). In cases of admission levels ≥10 ng/mL, however, mortality risk was similar between patients with cirrhosis and noncirrhosis patients (HR: 1.08, 95% CI = 0.43-2.73; P = .873). CONCLUSIONS: Hypovitaminosis D is a highly frequent disorder in critically ill patients admitted to ICU. A severe deficiency with levels <10 ng/mL is a high risk factor for increased mortality, especially in patients with cirrhosis.

The fragile spirituality of parents whose children died in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Spiritual care is recognized as a relevant dimension of health care. In the context of pediatric palliative end-of-life care, spirituality entails more than adhering to a spiritual worldview or religion. Interviews with parents whose critically ill child died in the pediatric intensive care unit revealed features of a spirituality that is fragmentary and full of contradictions. This type of spirituality, which we refer to as fragile, speaks of parents' connectedness with the deceased child and the hope of some kind of reuniting after one's own death. Acknowledging that fragments of spirituality can be part of parents' experiences in their child's end-of-life stage can be a meaningful contribution to compassionate care.

Early High-Dose Vitamin D3 for Critically Ill, Vitamin D-Deficient Patients.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency is a common, potentially reversible contributor to morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients. The potential benefits of vitamin D supplementation in acute critical illness require further study. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of early vitamin D3 supplementation in critically ill, vitamin D-deficient patients who were at high risk for death. Randomization occurred within 12 hours after the decision to admit the patient to an intensive care unit. Eligible patients received a single enteral dose of 540,000 IU of vitamin D3 or matched placebo. The primary end point was 90-day all-cause, all-location mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1360 patients were found to be vitamin D-deficient during point-of-care screening and underwent randomization. Of these patients, 1078 had baseline vitamin D deficiency (25-hydroxyvitamin D level, <20 ng per milliliter [50 nmol per liter]) confirmed by subsequent testing and were included in the primary analysis population. The mean day 3 level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D was 46.9±23.2 ng per milliliter (117±58 nmol per liter) in the vitamin D group and 11.4±5.6 ng per milliliter (28±14 nmol per liter) in the placebo group (difference, 35.5 ng per milliliter; 95% confidence interval [CI], 31.5 to 39.6). The 90-day mortality was 23.5% in the vitamin D group (125 of 531 patients) and 20.6% in the placebo group (109 of 528 patients) (difference, 2.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.1 to 7.9; P = 0.26). There were no clinically important differences between the groups with respect to secondary clinical, physiological, or safety end points. The severity of vitamin D deficiency at baseline did not affect the association between the treatment assignment and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Early administration of high-dose enteral vitamin D3 did not provide an advantage over placebo with respect to 90-day mortality or other, nonfatal outcomes among critically ill, vitamin D-deficient patients. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; VIOLET ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03096314.).

Effect of high-dose vitamin D3 on 28-day mortality in adult critically ill patients with severe vitamin D deficiency: a study protocol of a multicentre, placebo-controlled double-blind phase III RCT (the VITDALIZE study).

INTRODUCTION: Observational studies have demonstrated an association between vitamin D deficiency and increased risk of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Cohort studies and pilot trials have suggested promising beneficial effects of vitamin D replacement in the critical ill, at least in patients with severe vitamin D deficiency. As vitamin D is a simple, low-cost and safe intervention, it has potential to improve survival in critically ill patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre, international trial, 2400 adult patients with severe vitamin D deficiency (25-hydroxyvitamin D≤12 ng/mL) will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio by www.randomizer.at to receive a loading dose of 540 000 IU cholecalciferol within 72 hours after intensive care unit (ICU) admission, followed by 4000 IU daily for 90 days or placebo. Hypercalcaemia may occur as a side effect, but is monitored by regular checks of the calcium level. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 28 days after randomisation. Secondary outcomes are: ICU, hospital, 90-day and 1-year mortality; hospital and ICU length of stay, change in organ dysfunction on day 5 as measured by Sequential Organ Function Assessment (SOFA) score, number of organ failures; hospital and ICU readmission until day 90; discharge destination, self-reported infections requiring antibiotics until day 90 and health-related quality of life. Recruitment status is ongoing. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: National ethical approval was obtained by the Ethics Committee of the University of Graz for Austria, Erasme University Brussels (Belgium) and University Hospital Frankfurt (Germany), and will further be gained according to individual national processes. On completion, results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. The study findings will be presented at national and international meetings with abstracts online. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03188796, EudraCT-No: 2016-002460-13.

Oxidative stress in critical care and vitamins supplement therapy: "a beneficial care enhancing".

OBJECTIVE: Critical illnesses are a significant public health issue because of their high rate of mortality, the increasing use of the Intensive Care Units and the resulting healthcare cost that is about 80 billion of dollars per year. Their mortality is about 12% whereas sepsis mortality reaches 30-40%. The only instruments currently used against sepsis are early diagnosis and antibiotic therapies, but the mortality rate can also be decreased through an improvement of the patient's nutrition. The aim of this paper is to summarize the effects of vitamins A, B, C and E on the balance between pro-oxidants and anti-oxidants in the critical care setting to confirm "a beneficial care enhancing". MATERIALS AND METHODS: The peer-reviewed articles analyzed were selected from PubMed databases using the keywords "critical care", "intensive care", "critical illness", "sepsis", "nutritional deficiency", "vitamins", "oxidative stress", "infection", and "surgery". Among the 654 papers identified, 160 articles were selected after title and abstract examination, removal of duplicates and of the studies on pediatric population. Finally, only the 92 articles relating to vitamins A, C, E and the B complex were analyzed. RESULTS: The use of vitamins decreased morbidity and mortality in perioperative period and critically ill patients, especially in ICU. Among the most encouraging results, we found that the use of vitamins, both as monotherapy and in vitamins combinations, play a crucial role in the redox balance. Vitamins, especially vitamins A, C, E and the B complex, could help prevent oxidative damage through the breakdown of the oxidizing chemical chain reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Even if the results of the studies are sometimes discordant or inconclusive, the current opinion is that the supplementation of one or more of these vitamins in critically ill patients may improve their clinical outcome, positively affecting the morbidity and the mortality. Further, randomized studies are required to deeply understand the potentiality of a vitamin supplementation therapy and develop homogeneous and standardized protocols to be adopted in every critical care scenario.