Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Einstein (Sao Paulo) ; 18: eAE4799, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32215466

RESUMEN

The Brazilian Consensus on Nutrition in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Graft- versus -host disease was approved by Sociedade Brasileira de Transplante de Medula Óssea , with the participation of 26 Brazilian hematopoietic stem cell transplantation centers. It describes the main nutritional protocols in cases of Graft- versus -host disease, the main complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Conferencias de Consenso como Asunto , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/dietoterapia , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Terapia Nutricional/normas , Necesidades Nutricionales , Brasil , Congresos como Asunto , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/dietoterapia , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/etiología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/fisiopatología , Humanos , Terapia Nutricional/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
2.
Einstein (Säo Paulo) ; 18: eAE4799, 2020. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1090073

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT The Brazilian Consensus on Nutrition in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Graft- versus -host disease was approved by Sociedade Brasileira de Transplante de Medula Óssea , with the participation of 26 Brazilian hematopoietic stem cell transplantation centers. It describes the main nutritional protocols in cases of Graft- versus -host disease, the main complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.


RESUMO O Consenso Brasileiro de Nutrição no Transplante de Células Tronco Hematopoiéticas: doença do enxerto contra o hospedeiro foi aprovado pela Sociedade Brasileira de Transplante de Medula Óssea, com a participação de 26 centros brasileiros de transplante de células-tronco hematopoiéticas. O Consenso descreve as principais condutas nutricionais em casos de doença do enxerto contra o hospedeiro, a principal complicação do transplante de células-tronco hematopoiéticas.


Asunto(s)
Conferencias de Consenso como Asunto , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Terapia Nutricional/normas , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/dietoterapia , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Necesidades Nutricionales , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Brasil , Congresos como Asunto , Terapia Nutricional/métodos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/dietoterapia , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/etiología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/fisiopatología
3.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 41(8): 1286-1292, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27503936

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a serious complication of bone marrow transplantation (BMT), requiring higher doses of glucocorticoids or immunosuppressive therapies and further straining transplant recipients. Immunonutrition, such as vitamins and amino acid supplements, increase immunity and decrease inflammation and oxidative stress. This meta-analysis examines the impact of immunonutrition on the incidence of GVHD and postoperative infections among BMT recipients. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search for all published randomized controlled trials was conducted with PubMed, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar (1966-2016). Keywords in the search included variations of terms related to immunonutrition, such as "vitamin," "glutamine," and "transplant." Outcomes included incidence of GVHD and infection. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials involving 681 BMT recipients were analyzed: 332 receiving immunonutrition and 349 receiving standard nutrition. Immunonutrition is correlated with a decreased incidence of GVHD by 19% (relative risk [RR] = 0.810, 95% CI: 0.695-0.945, P = .007). There was no significant difference in the incidence of infections with immunonutrition (RR = 1.016, 95% CI: 0.819-1.261, P = .885). Subgroup analysis of glutamine compared with N-acetylcysteine, selenium, and eicosapentaenoic acid showed no significant difference in the incidence of GVHD or infections (RR = 0.913, 95% CI: 0.732-1.139, P = .419; RR = 0.951, 95% CI: 0.732-1.235; P = .708, respectively). CONCLUSION: The use of immunonutrition is associated with a reduced risk of GVHD in BMT recipients, potentially as a result of improved immune support and free radical scavenging. Providing immunonutrient supplements is a valuable adjunct in the routine care of BMT recipients, helping to alleviate a common and deadly complication.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea/efectos adversos , Suplementos Dietéticos , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/dietoterapia , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/dietoterapia , Humanos , Incidencia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8415805

RESUMEN

One of the mechanisms by which corticosteroids may modify acute graft vs host disease (GvHD) is via inhibition of arachidonic acid (AA) metabolism. Leukotriene B4 (LTB4) is a product of that pathway which may take part in the pathogenesis of GvHD through the stimulation of T-lymphopoiesis and T-lymphocyte activation. LTB4 is a metabolite of AA (20:4n-6). Alternate dietary sources of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), specifically eicosapenteinoic acid (20:5n-3) (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3) (DHA), shift the LTs formed with a decrease in LTB4 an increase in LTB5. LTB5 is a less potent agonist than LTB4 and this results in a theoretical decrease of LTB4 mediated events. Supplementation of in vitro bone marrow cultures with EPA or DHA had no detrimental effect on myeloid colony formation. Dietary EPA/DHA supplementation in mice with induced GvHD appeared to be safe and well tolerated. The LTB4:LTB5 ratio shifted from 7.65 +/- 1.75 in control-fed animals to 1.03 +/- 0.18. Fish-oil-supplementation did not compromise engraftment or stem cell content. Alone, this therapy was unable to modify GvHD.


Asunto(s)
Aceites de Pescado/farmacología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/dietoterapia , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/inmunología , Leucotrieno B4/metabolismo , Animales , Ácido Araquidónico/farmacología , Médula Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Ácidos Docosahexaenoicos/farmacología , Ácido Eicosapentaenoico/farmacología , Aceites de Pescado/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/metabolismo , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Lipooxigenasa/metabolismo , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratones Endogámicos CBA , Bazo/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos T/efectos de los fármacos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA