Establishing and maintaining a remote vascular surgery aortic program: A single-center 5-year experience at the Veterans Affairs.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to detail the process of establishing a surgical aortic telehealth program and report the outcomes of a 5-year experience. METHODS: A telehealth program was established between two regional Veterans Affairs hospitals, one of which was without a comprehensive aortic surgical program, until such a program was established at the referring institution. A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent aortic surgery from 2014 to 2019. The operative data, demographics, perioperative complications, and follow-up data were reviewed. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2019, 109 patients underwent aortic surgery for occlusive and aneurysmal disease. Preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up were done remotely via telehealth. The median age of the patients was 68 years, 107 were men (98.2%), 28 (25.7%) underwent open aortic repair, and 81 (74.3%) underwent endovascular repair. Of the 109 patients, 101 (92.7%) had a median follow-up of 24.3 months, 5 (4.6%) were lost to follow-up or were noncompliant, 2 (1.8%) were noncompliant with their follow-up imaging studies but responded to telephone interviews, and 1 (0.9%) moved to another state. At the 30-day follow-up, eight patients (7.3%) required readmission. Four complications were managed locally, and four patients (3.6%) required transfer back to the operative hospital for additional care. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth is a great tool to provide perioperative care and long-term follow-up for patients with aortic pathologies in remote locations. Most postoperative care and complications can be managed remotely, and patient compliance for long-term follow-up is high.

Preoperative autologous platelet pheresis reduces allogeneic platelet use and improves the postoperative PaO2/FiO2 ratio in complex aortic surgery: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: An autologous platelet-rich plasma pheresis (aPP) strategy can harvest partial whole blood that is separated into erythrocytes, plasma and platelets, and can reduce blood loss and transfusion during cardiovascular surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, the blood and organ conservation effects of this technique have not been confirmed in the context of complex aortic surgery. METHODS: Perioperative records of 147 adult patients who underwent complex aortic surgery were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: All patients received regular blood conservation treatment, and 57 patients received aPP. Whether or not the participants were propensity matched, decreased platelet and cryoprecipitate transfusions were found in the aPP group (both P < 0.001), but there were non-significant differences in erythrocyte transfusion, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and other outcomes when compared with the same parameters in the non-aPP group. The aPP group had a higher arterial oxygen partial pressure to inhaled oxygen concentration ratio on postoperative days 1, 2 and 7 than the non-aPP group (P < 0.001, P < 0.001 and P = 0.048, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of aPP was associated with a reduction in allogeneic platelet and cryoprecipitate transfusions as well as minor lung-protective effects during complex aortic surgery using CPB.

One-year experience of a regional service model of teleconsultation for planning and treatment of complex thoracoabdominal aortic disease.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to report the methodology and 1-year experience of a regional service model of teleconsultation for planning and treatment of complex thoracoabdominal aortic disease (TAAD). METHODS: Complex TAADs without a feasible conventional surgical repair were prospectively evaluated by vascular surgeons of the same public health service (National Health System) located in a huge area of 22,994 km2 with 3.7 million inhabitants and 11 tertiary hospitals. Surgeons evaluated computed tomography scans and clinical details that were placed on a web platform (Google Drive; Google, Mountain View, Calif) and shared by all surgeons. Patients gave informed consent for the teleconsultation. The surgeon who submits a case discusses in detail his or her case and proposes a possible therapeutic strategy. The other surgeons suggest other solutions and options in terms of grafts, techniques, or access to be used. Computed tomography angiography, angiography, and clinical outcomes of cases are then presented at the following telemeetings, and a final agreement of the operative strategy is evaluated. Teleconsultation is performed using a web conference service (WebConference.com; Avaya Inc, Basking Ridge, NJ) every month. An inter-rater agreement statistic was calculated, and the κ value was interpreted according to Altman's criteria for computed tomography angiography measurements. RESULTS: The rate of participation was constant (mean number of surgeons, 11; range, 9-15). Twenty-four complex TAAD cases were discussed for planning and operation during the study period. The interobserver reliability recorded was moderate (κ = 0.41-0.60) to good (κ = 0.61-0.80) for measurements of proximal and distal sealing and very good (κ = 0.81-1) for detection of any target vessel angulation >60 degrees, significant calcification (circumferential), and thrombus presence (>50%). The concordance for planning and therapeutic strategy among all participants was complete in 16 cases. In one case, the consultation was decisive for creating an innovative therapeutic strategy; in the remaining seven cases, the strategy proposed by the patient's surgeon was changed completely after the discussion. Technical success was the same (100%) if concordance in planning was present initially or not. Overall 6-month mortality was 4%, 0% for those patients with initial concordance in planning vs 12% for those without initial concordance (P = .33). Surgery was always performed in a tertiary hospital by local surgeons, and in two cases (8%) external surgeons joined the local surgical team. CONCLUSIONS: Such a regional service of teleconsultation may be of value in standardizing the treatment and derived costs of complex TAADs in a huge region under the same health provider. The shared decision-making strategy may be of medical-legal value as well.

Positive Impact of an Aortic Center Designation.

BACKGROUND: In January 2015, we created a multidisciplinary Aortic Center with the collaboration of Vascular Surgery, Cardiac Surgery, Interventional Radiology, Anesthesia and Hospital Administration. We report the initial success of creating a Comprehensive Aortic Center. METHODS: All aortic procedures performed from January 1, 2015 until December 31, 2016 were entered into a prospectively collected database and compared with available data for 2014. Primary outcomes included the number of all aortic related procedures, transfer acceptance rate, transfer time, and proportion of elective/emergent referrals. RESULTS: The Aortic Center included 5 vascular surgeons, 2 cardiac surgeons, and 2 interventional radiologists. Workflow processes were implemented to streamline patient transfers as well as physician and operating room notification. Total aortic volume increased significantly from 162 to 261 patients. This reflected an overall 59% (P = 0.0167) increase in all aorta-related procedures. We had a 65% overall increase in transfer requests with 156% increase in acceptance of referrals and 136% drop in transfer denials (P < 0.0001). Emergent abdominal aortic cases accounted for 17% (n = 45) of our total aortic volume in 2015. The average transfer time from request to arrival decreased from 515 to 352 min, although this change was not statistically significant. We did see a significant increase in the use of air-transfers for aortic patients (P = 0.0041). Factorial analysis showed that time for transfer was affected only by air-transfer use, regardless of the year the patient was transferred. Transfer volume and volume of aortic related procedures remained stable in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: Designation as a comprehensive Aortic Center with implementation of strategic workflow systems and a culture of "no refusal of transfers" resulted in a significant increase in aortic volume for both emergent and elective aortic cases. Case volumes increased for all specialties involved in the center. Improvements in transfer center and emergency medical services communication demonstrated a trend toward more efficient transfer times. These increases and improvements were sustainable for 2 years after this designation.

Long-term outcomes after aortic arch surgery: results of a study involving 623 patients.

OBJECTIVES: To assess early and long-term outcomes in a large cohort of patients undergoing open aortic arch surgery. METHODS: From 1996 to 2012, 623 consecutive patients (mean age: 62.8 years) underwent aortic arch interventions in our institution. Of these, 208 (33.4%) presented with an acute aortic syndrome (AAS) and 415 (66.6%) with a chronic aortic pathology (CAP). During the study period, our surgical strategy involved extensive resections of the diseased aortic tissue at elective interventions, and a tear-oriented aortic replacement in patients with acute dissection. More extensive interventions were often performed in younger patients, and in those with connective tissue diseases and bicuspid aortic valves. A total arch replacement was frequently performed (53.3%). Antegrade selective cerebral perfusion was used in all cases. RESULTS: Overall in-hospital mortality was 23.1% in patients with AAS and 11.1% in patients with a CAP; in the same groups, postoperative permanent neurological dysfunction (PND) occurred in 9.6 and 5.6%, respectively. The follow-up was 94.4% complete. For in-hospital survivors, 5- and 10-year survival (%) were 79.4 ± 2.1 and 60.9 ± 3.2, respectively, not influenced by the underlying aortic disease. Cox regression identified age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.048; P < 0.001), preoperative renal failure (HR: 2.3; P = 0.003), diabetes (HR: 1.805; P = 0.005) and PND (HR: 2.4; P = 0.03) to be independent predictors for the follow-up mortality. Overall, 109 (59% endovascular) aortic reinterventions were performed: 18.3% were proximal and 81.7% distal to the aortic arch. Five- and 10-year freedom from aortic redo (%) were 82.8 ± 1.9 and 77.7 ± 2.6, respectively. Aortic dissection (HR: 1.7; P = 0.03) was the only independent predictor of reoperative surgery at the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic arch surgery was associated with satisfactory early and long-term outcomes. Survival was largely determined by patient comorbidities and postoperative PND. While the underlying aortic disease did not affect long-term mortality, chronic dissection was associated with increased need for aortic reinterventions.

Touch massage: a pilot study of a complex intervention.

OBJECTIVES: To report and evaluate a complex touch massage intervention according to the British Medical Research Council framework. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of touch massage on levels of anxiety and physiological stress in patients scheduled for elective aortic surgery. BACKGROUND: The use of touch massage has increased during the past decade but no systematic studies have been implemented to investigate the effectiveness of such treatment. It is important to conduct multidisciplinary investigations into the effects of complex interventions such as touch massage. For this, the British Medical Research Council has provided a useful framework to guide the development, piloting, evaluation and reporting of complex intervention studies. METHOD: A pilot study with a randomized controlled design including 20 patients (10 + 10) scheduled for elective aortic surgery. Selected outcome parameters included; self-reported anxiety, measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y instrument, and physiological stress, measured by heart rate variability, blood pressure, respiratory frequency, oxygen saturation and concentrations of cortisol, insulin and glucose in serum. RESULTS: There were significant differences in self-reported anxiety levels before and after touch massage (p = 0.007), this was not observed in the control group (p = 0.833). There was a significant difference in self-reported anxiety levels between the touch massage group and the control group after touch massage and rest (p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in physiological stress-related outcome parameters between patients who received touch massage and controls. CONCLUSION: In our study, touch massage decreased anxiety levels in patients scheduled for elective aortic surgery, and the British Medical Research Council framework was a useful guideline for the development, evaluation and reporting of a touch massage intervention. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Touch massage can reduce patients' anxiety levels and is thus an important nursing intervention in intensive and post-operative care.

[Arterial allografts in vascular surgery--best choice in cases of aortic graft infection?!]. / Arterielle Homografts in der Gefäßchirurgie - idealer Gefäßersatz bei aortalen Gefäßprotheseninfektionen?!

Infection of vascular prostheses, particularly in the central aortic position, is a growing challenge in vascular surgery. Beside the use of extra-anatomic prosthetic bypasses the need for anatomic reconstruction with infection-resistant materials is growing. The use of arterial allografts is an established method in many centres for in situ reconstruction. Used historically as the only option for vessel replacement, allografts were seldom used once the development of synthetic prostheses started. Use as a vascular graft in infected regions began in the 1990s. Discussions about the use of "fresh" allografts without preservation were terminated by order of the European Union in 2003 (although the long-term benefits have been foreseen). Currently, because of the German Tissue Act, only "cryopreserved" allografts can be used. Larger, partially controlled studies about the outcome after cryopreserved allograft transplantation have shown similar results to the use of silver prostheses, with a significantly lower prevalence of re-infection. Questions remain about the use of immunosuppression after human allograft transplantation. Immunological interactions are mainly involved in allograft degeneration. Aneurysmal changes (most commonly late degeneration of allografts) can be treated with endovascular procedures and therefore have no direct impact on long-term results. The availability of allografts in Europe tends to be restricted, but companies based outside the EU permit a good supply. The use of allografts in non-university institutions shows the wide acceptance of the material and its suitability for routine use in vascular surgery, even if the treatment of infected vascular prostheses in the central position remains associated with high morbidity and mortality.

Utilidad del uso de la ecocardiografía transesofágica durante la inserción de una endoprótesis de aorta torácica. Caso clínico / Usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography during insertion of a thoracic aorta endoprosthesis. A case report

El uso de la ecocardiografía transesofágica (ETE) durante la inserción de una endoprótesis aórtica torácica percutánea puede ser de gran utilidad. Esto es porque se trata de una técnica de monitorización escasamente invasiva con la que se obtienen imágenes de la aorta en tiempo real y de alta calidad, sin interferir en el campo quirúrgico. Se presenta el caso clínico de un paciente de alto riesgo portador de una disección de aorta torácica tipo B al que se le instaló con éxito una endoprótesis bajo visión angiográfica y ecocardiográfica. La ETE fue muy útil durante este procedimiento, pues permitió una excelente visión anatómica de la aorta. Además, con el uso de Doppler color fue posible evaluar la ausencia de endofugas paraprotésicas durante el procedimiento. En conclusión, la ETE puede ser una técnica de imágenes útil y complementaria de la angiografía durante la instalación de una endoprótesis de aorta torácica.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) can be very useful during endovascular treatment of the thoracic aorta. TEE is a minimally invasive monitoring technique that provides high qua lit y images of the aorta without interfering the surgical field. A successful endovascular repair of a thoracic aortic dissection monitored by angiography and TEE is reported. The excellent images of the aorta provided by TEE and color Doppler were very useful for its anatomical evaluation and for demonstrating the absence of paraprosthetic endoleaks. In conclusion, during the implantation of a stent-graft in the aorta, TEE must be installed because it provides additional in formation to angiography.

O uso da ecocardiografia transesofágica (ETE) durante a colocação de uma endoprótese aórtica torácica percutanea pode ser de grande utilidade, por tratar-se de uma técnica de monitoramento minimamente invasiva que gera imagens da aorta de alta qualidade em tempo real e sem interferir no campo cirúrgico. É apresentado o caso clínico de um paciente de alto risco, portador de uma dissecção de aorta torácica tipo B, ao qual se colocou com exito uma endoprótese sob visão angiográfica e ecocardiográfica. A ETE foi de grande utilidade durante este procedimento, pois permitiu uma excelente visão anatómica da aorta. Além disso, o uso do Doppler em cores possibilitou avaliar a ausencia de endofugas paraprotéticas durante o procedimento. Em conclusão, a ETE pode ser uma técnica de imagens útil e complementar da angiografia durante a colocação de uma endoprótese de aorta torácica.

High-dose adenosine-induced asystole assisting accurate deployment of thoracic stent grafts in conscious patients.

Adenosine has been used to induce asystole and assist deployment of endoluminal grafts. However, application of high-dose adenosine in conscious patients has not been described. In this prospective study, we administered high-dose adenosine in patients undergoing thoracic stent grafting. Asystole duration in relationship to the dosage of adenosine, safety, and side effect profiles was investigated. All patients who underwent thoracic stent grafting between 1998 and 2006 were the potential study subjects. They received monitored anesthesia care and local anesthesia unless contraindicated. Adenosine was given via rapid intravenous bolus immediately prior to the deployment of the stent graft. Every patient received a dose of 36 mg. If needed, a second dose of 18 mg was given. Duration of asystole was recorded after each administration. Patients' vital signs before and after administration were also documented. Side effect profiles were collected intra- and postoperatively. A total of 46 patients received adenosine (34 men, 12 women). Mean age was 60.4 +/- 17.5 years. American Society of Anesthesiologists scores were II in one patient (2%), III in six patients (13%), and IV in 39 patients (85%). Eighteen patients received a single dose of 36 mg adenosine, 15 were given a second dose of 18 mg, and 13 received nonstandard dosages. Asystole durations were 18.8 +/- 8.8 and 11.6 +/- 5.5 sec for 36 and 18 mg, respectively. Technical success was achieved in all cases. The differences achieved statistical significance (p = 0.0009). There were no severe cardiac or pulmonary complications. High-dose adenosine can be given safely in conscious patients. The dose-response was predictable and reproducible. The dosages used in our study induce sufficient duration of asystole, which ensured accurate deployment of thoracic stent grafts.

Transfusion requirements and outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery using intra-operative cell salvage.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) is the recovery, anticoagulation, filtration and reinfusion of blood lost during surgery. The aim of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of ICS in emergency and elective abdominal aortic surgery. METHODS: This study reviews volumes of blood loss, blood salvaged with ICS, allogenic blood requirements, and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery using ICS. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery are included. Supplemental allogenic blood was not required in 45/79 (57%) of all patients. Transfusion with allogenic blood was not necessary in 41/63 (66%) of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. ICS was associated with no major complications. CONCLUSION: ICS is a safe procedure and substantially reduces the need for blood transfusion in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery. It may substantially alleviate shortages of allogenic blood and should be part of the armamentarium of vascular units.

Avances en el síndrome aórtico agudo / Progress in the acute aortic syndrome

El síndrome aórtico agudo es un proceso agudo de la pared aórtica que afecta a la capa media; incluye la disección aórtica, el hematoma intramural y la úlcera penetrante. En los últimos años, las técnicas de imagen han ayudado a conocer la historia natural de estas entidades y a comprender mejor el importante dinamismo de esta enfermedad. A pesar de los importantes avances en el diagnóstico y el tratamiento quirúrgico, la mortalidad en la fase aguda sigue siendo alta. La sospecha clínica precoz y la mejoría de la experiencia quirúrgica parecen ser las únicas variables que podrían facilitar la reducción de la mortalidad. Una vez superada la fase aguda, en la mayoría de los pacientes permanece una afectación de la aorta descendente y un 30% presenta complicaciones a los 3-5 años. En esta fase es necesario instaurar un tratamiento médico óptimo y un seguimiento próximo con técnicas de imagen. La incorporación del tratamiento intravascular ha abierto nuevas perspectivas en el tratamiento de esta enfermedad y podría mejorar el pronóstico a largo plazo. En este artículo se revisan los avances en el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de este síndrome (AU)

Acute aortic syndrome is an acute lesion of the aortic wall involving the aortic media. The term covers aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating ulcer. In the last few years, imaging techniques have increased our understanding of the natural history of these disease entities and of the dynamics of the disease processes. Despite significant advances in diagnosis and surgical treatment, the mortality rate in the acute phase remains high. Early clinical suspicion and greater surgical expertise appear to be the only factors that are able reduce mortality. Once the acute phase is past, the descending aorta continues to be involved in most patients, 30% of whom develop complications within 3-5 years. During this later phase, it is essential to optimize medical treatment and to use imaging techniques to follow-up the patient closely. The availability of endovascular treatment has provided new approaches to the management of the condition and could improve long-term prognosis. The aim of this article was to review recent progress in the diagnosis and therapeutic management of this syndrome (AU)

Iron deficiency in the acute-phase reaction after open aortic surgery.

The objective of this study was to quantify the magnitude of iron deficiency in the postoperative period after open aortic surgery. This was a prospective observational study in 55 consecutive patients. Blood samples were obtained on postoperative days 1, 2, 4, 30, and 45, and the parameters determined were the following: iron, transferrin, transferrin saturation index, transferrin-soluble receptor, ferritin, red cell count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, serum C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, and number of blood units transfused. We performed statistical ANOVA test for repetitive measurements (lower bound) in regard to its basal level. Iron deficiency and its parameters reached the maximum at 48 hours postoperatively (iron: 18.92 g/dL and transferrin saturation index: 11.1%) (P <.05). There was not a complete recovery after 45 days (iron: 51.23 g/dL and transferrin saturation index: 18.0%) (P <.05). A similar evolution was observed in the other measured parameters (red cell count: 3.5 x 106/L.; hemoglobin: 10.4 g/dL; hematocrit: 30.7%) (P <.005), none affecting the values of concentration or volume (P <.05). Transferrin-soluble receptors, normal at first, were increased at postoperative days 30 and 45 (2.7 and 2.4 mg/dL respectively, P <.005). After open aortic surgery there is an important acute-phase reaction, a dramatic iron deficiency, and a lack of its transporters until the 45th analyzed day. The elevation of transferrin-soluble receptors in the 4th and 6th weeks denotes a necessity of iron supplementation for a correct development of the immature hematic cells since blood parameters do not reach normal levels in the 6th postoperative week.

Results of endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta with the Talent Thoracic stent graft: the Talent Thoracic Retrospective Registry.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic diseases demonstrated low perioperative morbidity and mortality when compared with conventional open repair. Long-term effectiveness of this minimally invasive technique remains to be proven. The Talent Thoracic Retrospective Registry was designed to evaluate the impact of this therapy on patients treated in 7 major European referral centers over an 8-year period. METHODS: Data from 457 consecutive patients (113 emergency and 344 elective cases) who underwent endovascular thoracic aortic repair with the Medtronic Talent Thoracic stent graft (Medtronic/AVE, Santa Rosa, Calif) were collected. Follow-up analysis (24 +/- 19.4 months, range 1-85.1 months) was based on clinical and imaging findings, including all adverse events. To ensure consistency of data interpretation and event reporting, one physician reviewed all adverse events and deaths for the whole cohort of patients. In the case of discrepancies, the treating physicians were queried. FINDINGS: Among 422 patients who survived the interventional procedure (in-hospital mortality 5%, 23 patients), mortality during follow-up was 8.5% (36 patients), and in 11 of them the death was related to the aortic disease. Persistent endoleak was reported at imaging follow-up in 64 cases: 44 were primary (9.6%) and 21 occurred during follow-up (4.9%). Seven patients with persistent endoleak had aortic rupture during follow-up, at a variable time from 40 days to 35 months, and all subsequently died. A minor incidence of migration of the stent graft (7 cases), graft fabric alteration (2 cases), and modular disconnection (3 cases) was observed at imaging. Kaplan-Meier overall survival estimate at 1 year was 90.97%, at 3 years was 85.36%, and at 5 years was 77.49%. At the same intervals, freedom from a second procedure (either open conversion or endovascular) was 92.45%, 81.3%, and 70.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment for thoracic aortic disease with the Talent stent graft is associated with low early morbidity and mortality rates also for patients who are at high risk and treated on an emergency basis. Follow-up data indicate a substantial durability of the procedure with a high freedom from related death and secondary interventions.

Progress in ascending and aortic arch surgery: minimally invasive surgery, blood conservation, and neurological deficit prevention.

BACKGROUND: Herein are described recent developments in aortic surgery techniques and the improved results. METHODS: Of 403 ascending and aortic arch operations, 68 patients underwent minimally invasive aortic surgery including 23 for aortic dissection, 5 for Marfan syndrome, 29 reoperations, and 39 with hypothermic arrest. Blood conservation methods were used in 187 of the 403 patients (46.5%). Aortic valve procedures were used in 267 (66.2%), including 51 (12.7%) valve-preserving operations. A protocol for stroke and neurocognitive deficit prevention was used in an attempt to prevent neurologic deficits. Data were prospectively collected and included new neurocognitive events either by formal testing (n = 35) or by informal questioning. RESULTS: Stroke occurred in 2.0% (8 of 403); clinical gross neurocognitive deficits in 2.5% (10 of 403) with a 98% 30-day survival. For those patients undergoing the minimally invasive operation 1 hospital death occurred (98.5% survival). Homologous operative transfusions were required in only 12% of blood conservation patients (23 of 187) and their postoperative intubation time, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and hospital stay were significantly shorter (p < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive surgery is particularly useful for reoperations. The blood conservation methods appear to be beneficial and the number of neurologic deficits is low with the current protocol.

Autologous versus allogeneic transfusion in aortic surgery: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) and intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) in blood-conservation strategies for infrarenal aortic surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Recent concerns over the risks of transfusion-related infection have resulted in sharp rises in the cost of blood preparations. Autologous transfusion may be a safe alternative to allogeneic transfusion, which has been associated with immune modulation and postoperative infection. METHODS: This multicenter prospective randomized trial compared standard transfusion practice with autologous transfusion combining ANH with ICS in 145 patients undergoing elective aortic surgery. The primary outcome measures were the proportion of patients requiring allogeneic blood and the volume of allogeneic transfusion. The secondary outcome measures were the frequency of complications, including postoperative infection, and postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: The combination of ANH and ICS reduced the volume of allogeneic blood transfused from a median of two units to zero units. The proportion of patients transfused was 56% in allogeneic and 43% in autologous. There were no significant differences in complications or length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Both ANH and ICS were safe and reduced the allogeneic blood requirement in patients undergoing elective infrarenal aortic surgery.

Should the cell saver autotransfusion system be routinely used in elective aortic surgery?

The objective of this study is to identify the aortic surgery procedures in which the use of the Cell Saver autotransfusion system is beneficial in terms of the amount of autologous blood recovered and the reduction in blood bank demands. An evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of the system is also presented. Four hundred and thirty-four elective aortic interventions were retrospectively reviewed to examine the use of intraoperative autotransfusion (IAT). Evaluation was made of risk factors, preoperative hematological variables, the volume of IAT-processed reinfused blood, and homologous transfusion requirements over the period of hospitalization. The routine use of the IAT system was cost-effective in the interventions for AAA and TAA. In patients subjected to aortobifemoral bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease, IAT served to alleviate demands on blood bank inventories, although in our center its use led to a slight increase in net cost. The routine use of IAT during unilateral revascularization due to occlusive disease offered no benefits in terms of reduced homologous transfusion requirements or cost-effectiveness.

¿Es útil el empleo del autotransfusor en la cirugía aortoilíaca por enfermedad oclusiva? / Use of autotransfusion device in aortoiliac reconstruction because occlusive disease. Is it worthwile?

Objetivo: El objetivo del presente estudio es determinar si el empleo de dispositivos de autotransfusión es útil en las reconstrucciones del sector aortoilíaeo por patología oclusiva. Material y métodos: Se analizó de forma retrospectiva el empleo del autotransfusor en 227 procedimientos electivos primarios realizados sobre la aorta por patología oclusiva del sector aortoilíaeo. Se valoraron los factores de riesgo, valores hematológicos preoperatorios, volumen reinfundido por el autotransfusor y administración de sangre homóloga. Se realizó, además, una valoración del coste económico derivado del uso de AT.Resultados: De los 227 procedimientos, 201 fueron bypasses aortobifemorales y 26 aortofemorales. El uso del autotransfusor se asoció a una disminución en la cantidad de unidades de sangre homóloga administrada en los pacientes intervenidos de bypass aortobifemoral (1,7 frente a 3 unidades, p<0,01). Sin embargo, esto no ocurrió en las revascularizaciones unilaterales (1 frente a 1,2 unidades -N.S.). Asimismo, el mímero de pacientes en los que la cirugía se realizó sin necesidad de transfusión homóloga durante todo el ingreso fue mayor cuando se empleó el autotransfusor, (41 por ciento frente a 24 por ciento, p<0,05). Esta diferencia fue significativa en los pacientes intervenidos de un bypass aortobifemoral (41 por cientofrente a 17 por ciento, p<0,05) pero no para la cirugía aortofemoral (40 por ciento frente a 47 por ciento, p NS).El coste del dispositivo de autotransfusión se justificó con recuperaciones superiores a 440 ml de sangre. Siguiendo este criterio, el autotransfusor resultó rentable desde un punto de vista de costes en el 36 por ciento de los pacientes (37 por ciento en los aortobifemorales y 20 por ciento en los aortofemorales). El uso de autotransfusor supone en nuestro medio un coste aproximado adicional de unas 3.000 ptas. por paciente en el caso de un bypass aortobifemoral y de 19.000 ptas. en un bypass aortofemoral. Conclusiones El empleo rutinario del autotransfusor está justificado en el bypass aortobifemoral por patología oclusiva. Reduce cl consumo de sangre, con un discreto aumento de costes. En la cirugía unilateral, cl empleo rutinario del autotransfusor no está justificado, no reduce el consumo de sangre de banco y no es coste-efectivo. (AU)

Improved results with conventional management of infrarenal aortic infection.

PURPOSE: Interest in alternative methods, such as autogenous vein grafts and aortic allografts, for the management of infrarenal aortic infection (IRAI) has been stimulated by the historically disappointing results with conventional surgical management. Recently, there have been dramatic improvements in the results of axillofemoral bypass grafting (AXFB) followed by excision of the IRAI that have gone relatively unrecognized. The purpose of this report is the presentation of modern-day results in the treatment of IRAI with conventional surgical methods. METHODS: From January 1, 1983, through June 30, 1998, patients with IRAI underwent treatment with AXFB and complete excision of the IRAI. The patients were followed for survival, limb salvage, and AXFB graft patency. The results were tabulated with life-table methods. RESULTS: During the 15-year study period, 60 patients (51 men, nine women; mean age, 68 years) underwent treatment for IRAI (50 graft infections, including 16 graft-enteric fistulae, and 10 primary aortic infections). The mean follow-up period was 41 months. The perioperative mortality rate was 13% (12% for graft infection, and 20% for primary infection). The overall 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 67% and 47%, respectively. The limb salvage rates at 2 and 5 years were 93% and 82%, respectively. The 5-year primary AXFB graft patency rate was 73%. CONCLUSION: These results show an improvement with the conventional management of IRAI equal or superior to those results reported with alternative methods, including femoral vein grafts or aortic allografts. These results should be regarded as the modern standard with which alternative therapies can be compared.

Elective aortic surgery with minimal banked blood.

It has been a historical supposition that aortic surgery, even in an elective setting, has been associated with the transfusion of large amounts of blood products. We feel that this assumption is now dated, and in fact far fewer patients now receive allogenic blood products. To assess this assumption, we carried out a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent elective aortic surgery over an 18-month period from April 1994 to October 1995. Factors analyzed included type of procedure, blood loss, amount of Cell Saver blood replaced, need for autologous blood transfusion, and need for allogenic blood transfusion. Sixty-seven patients underwent elective aortic surgery with either an aortic tube graft (23), an aortobiiliac graft (25), or an aortobifemoral graft (19). The male:female ratio was 48:19, with a mean age of 67 years (range, 42-85 years). Mortality and morbidity were 4.4 per cent and 8.9 per cent, respectively. The average blood loss per patient was 770 cc. Cell saver was used in 65 patients, with the average amount of blood returned being 542 cc. Overall, 73 per cent of patients did not require allogenic blood transfusion, and 58 per cent did not need any type of transfusion. Of those who stored autologous blood prior to operation, none required allogenic blood perioperatively. With the new advances in autologous blood transfusion both by predeposit and salvage transfusion, we have greatly reduced the need for transfusion of allogenic blood products in patients undergoing major aortic surgery. This is reassuring, and although increasing short-term cost, will reduce the morbidity-infectious, noninfectious, and immunologic-associated in prior decades with allogenic blood transfusions. We strongly recommend the use of Cell Saver techniques, and also, where possible, patients should be encouraged to donate their own blood prior to major aortic procedures for future transfusion.

Intraoperative autologous transfusion during elective infrarenal aortic reconstruction: a decision analysis model.

PURPOSE: The use of intraoperative autologous transfusion devices expanded during the last decade as a result of the increased awareness of transfusion-associated complications. This study was designed to determine whether routine use of an intraoperative autologous transfusion device (Haemonetics Cell Saver [CS]) during elective infrarenal aortic reconstructions is cost-effective ($50,000/QALYs threshold). METHODS: A decision analysis tree was constructed to model all of the complications that are associated with red blood cell replacement during aortic reconstructions for both abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). It was assumed that a unit of CS return (CSR; 250 ml/unit) equaled a unit of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) and that all CS transfusions were necessary. Transfusion requirements (AAA:PRBC = 2.8 +/- 3.2 units, CSB = 3.7 +/- 3.2 units; AIOD:PRBC = 3.1 +/- 3.0 units, CSR = 2.1 +/- 1.7 units) were determined from retrospective review of all elective aortic reconstructions (AAA, N = 63; AIOD, N = 75) from Jan. 1991 to June 1995 in which the CS was used (82.1% of all reconstructions). Risk of allogenic transfusion-related complications (transfusion reaction, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, human immunodeficiency virus, human T-cell lymphotropic virus types I and II) and their associated treatment costs (expressed in dollars and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were obtained from the medical literature, institutional audit, and a consensus of physicians. RESULTS: Routine use of the CS during elective infrarenal aortic reconstructions was not cost-effective in our practice. Use during reconstructions for AAA repairs cost $263.75 but added only 0.00218 QALYs, for a rate of $120,794/QALY. Use during reconstructions for AIOD was even more costly at $356.68 and provided even less benefit at 0.00062 QALYs, for a rate of $578,275/QALY. The sensitivity analyses determined that the routine use of the CS would be cost-effective in our practice only for AAA repairs if the incidence of hepatitis C were tenfold greater than the baseline assumption. The model determined that CS was cost-effective if the CSR exceed 5 units during reconstructions for AAA and 6 units during reconstructions for AIOD. CONCLUSIONS: The routine use of the CS during elective infrarenal aortic reconstructions is not cost-effective. The use of the device should be reserved for a select group of aortic reconstructions, including those in which cost-effective salvage volumes are anticipated. Alternatively, the CS should be used as a reservoir and activated as a salvage device if significant bleeding is encountered.