RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Skin diseases are common occupational illnesses for migrant farmworkers. Farmworkers face many barriers in accessing health care resources. PURPOSE: Framed by the Health Behavior Model, the purpose of this study was to assess health care utilization for skin disease by migrant Latino farmworkers. METHODS: Three hundred and four migrant and seasonal Latino farmworkers in North Carolina were enrolled in a longitudinal study of skin disease and health care utilization over a single agricultural season. Self-reported and dermatologist-diagnosed skin condition data were collected at baseline and at up to 4 follow-up assessments. Medical visit rates were compared to national norms. FINDINGS: Self-reported skin problems and diagnosed skin disease were common among farmworkers. However, only 34 health care visits were reported across the entire agricultural season, and none of the visits were for skin diseases. Nevertheless, self-treatment for skin conditions was common, including use of non-prescription preparations (63%), prescription products (9%), and home remedies (6%). General medical office visits were reported in 3.2% of the assessments, corresponding to 1.6 office visits per person year. CONCLUSIONS: The migrant farmworker population consists largely of young men who make little use of clinic services. Skin conditions are very common among these workers, but use of medical services for these conditions is not common. Instead, farmworkers rely primarily on self-treatment. Clinic-based studies of farmworker skin conditions will not account for most injury or disease in this population and have the potential for biased estimates.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Trabajadores Agrícolas/etnología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/etnología , Servicios de Salud Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades de la Piel/etnología , Migrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Enfermedades de los Trabajadores Agrícolas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Trabajadores Agrícolas/tratamiento farmacológico , Dermatología/estadística & datos numéricos , Escolaridad , Humanos , Masculino , Medicina Tradicional , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/uso terapéutico , North Carolina/epidemiología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Prevalencia , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Piel/tratamiento farmacológico , Migrantes/clasificación , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
We successfully treated a patient with occupational hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) caused by Grifola frondosa (Maitake) mushroom spore with an extra-fine aerosol corticosteroid; beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) dissolved in hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA). A 49-year-old woman developed respiratory symptoms 3 months after beginning work on a mushroom farm. She was diagnosed as HP based on radiological and serological findings. Oral prednisolone therapy improved her HP and she returned to the same farm. Her HP relapsed after 5 months, and daily 400 microg of HFA-BDP was administered with gradual improvement. An extra-fine particle inhaled corticosteroid might reach appropriate alveoli to be effective therapy for mild HP.
Asunto(s)
Agaricales/inmunología , Enfermedades de los Trabajadores Agrícolas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Trabajadores Agrícolas/inmunología , Alveolitis Alérgica Extrínseca/tratamiento farmacológico , Alveolitis Alérgica Extrínseca/inmunología , Administración por Inhalación , Propelentes de Aerosoles , Beclometasona/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Hidrocarburos Fluorados/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esporas Fúngicas/inmunologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, intensity and associated risk factors for infection with Ascaris, hookworms and Trichuris in three tea-growing communities in Assam, India. METHODS: Single faecal samples were collected from 328 individuals and subjected to centrifugal flotation and the Kato Katz quantitation technique and prevalence and intensities of infection with each parasite calculated. Associations between parasite prevalence, intensity and host and environmental factors were then made using both univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of Ascaris was 38% [95% confidence interval (CI): 33, 43], and the individual prevalence of hookworm and Trichuris was 43% (95% CI: 38, 49). The strongest predictors for the intensity of one or more geohelminths using multiple regression (P < or = 0.10) were socioeconomic status, age, household crowding, level of education, religion, use of footwear when outdoors, defecation practices, pig ownership and water source. CONCLUSION: A universal blanket treatment with broad-spectrum anthelmintics together with promotion of scholastic and health education and improvements in sanitation is recommended for helminth control in the communities under study.