A Practical Guide to Biofeedback Therapy for Pelvic Floor Disorders.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Biofeedback therapy (BFT) is effective for managing pelvic floor disorders (i.e., defecatory disorders and fecal incontinence). However, even in controlled clinical trials, only approximately 60% of patients with defecatory disorders experienced long-term improvement. The review serves to update practitioners on recent advances and to identify practical obstacles to providing biofeedback therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: The efficacy and safety of biofeedback therapy have been evaluated in defecatory disorders, fecal incontinence, and levator ani syndrome. Recent studies looked at outcomes in specific patient sub-populations and predictors of a response to biofeedback therapy. Biofeedback therapy is effective for managing defecatory disorders, fecal incontinence, and levator ani syndrome. Patients who have a lower bowel satisfaction score and use digital maneuvers fare better. Biofeedback therapy is recommended for patients with fecal incontinence who do not respond to conservative management. A subset of patients with levator ani syndrome who have dyssynergic defecation are more likely to respond to biofeedback therapy.

[Efficacy of spastic pelvic floor syndrome treated with electroacupuncture at Baliao (BL 31, BL 32, BL 33 and BL 34)].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical efficacy on spastic pelvic floor syndrome (SPFS) treated with electroacupuncture (EA) at Shangliao (BL 31), Ciliao (BL 32), Zhongliao (BL 33) and Xialiao (BL 34). METHODS: Thirty-six cases of SPFS were treated with EA at Shangliao (BL 31), Ciliao (BL 32), Zhongliao (BL 33) and Xialiao (BL 34), intermittent wave, 60 times/min in frequency, retained for 20 min. In general, the acupoints on one side were stimulated in each treatment. The bilateral acupoints stimulation was applied in serious cases. The treatment was given once every two days, five treatments made one session and totally three sessions were required. Before and after treatment, the clinical symptoms, anal kinetic indices defecation radiographic changes were observed. The follow-up observation was done in three months after the end of treatment. RESULTS: In three-months follow-up after treatment, 14 cases were cured, 18 cases improved and 4 cases failed. The total effective rate was 88. 9%. After treatment, the cases of incomplete defecation, difficult defecation, anal pain and anal obstruction were reduced apparently as compared with those before treatment, indicating the statistically significant differences (all P<0.01). After treatment, rectal anal reflex threshold (ARA) was increased, anal maximal contraction pressure (AMCP) was reduced to (16.62±1.54) kPa and anal rest pressure (ARP) was significantly reduced to (7.22±0.36) kPa, indicating the statistical differences as compared with those before treatment (all P<0.01). After treatment, anorectal angle (ARA) in forceful defecation was increased to (116.55±9.42)°, the distance between the anorectal junction and the pubococcygeal line was decreased, and the impression of puborectal muscle was alleviated apparently as compared with that before treatment (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: EA at Shangliao (BL 31), Ciliao (BL 32), Zhongliao (BL 33) and Xialiao (BL 34) achieves definite efficacy on SPFS and this therapeutic method obviously relieves the symptoms and deserves to be promoted in clinic.

[Treatment of levator ani syndrome: update and future developments]. / Terapia della sindrome dell'elevatore dell'ano.

Chronic proctalgia is defined by chronic or recurrent episodes of rectal pain or aching lasting at least 20 minutes in the absence of structural or systemic disease explanation for the pain syndrome. Digital rectal examination distinguishes between levator ani syndrome where the patient reports tenderness on palpation of the pubo-rectalis muscle and unspecified functional anorectal pain where no pain can be elicited. There is no consensus on its etiology, but chronic tension of the pelvic floor muscles is the most common view. Diagnosis is focused on excluding organic diseases potentially responsible for the pain. A number of small sized, non-controlled trials have evaluated different treatments for chronic proctalgia with frustrating results for both patients and physicians. A recent well designed, prospective, randomized, controlled trial has evaluated the three most commonly prescribed treatments to relax pelvic floor muscles in chronic proctalgia: biofeedback, electrogalvanic stimulations and digital massage of the levator ani. The study has provided unequivocal evidence that biofeedback is effective treatment for chronic proctalgia, but its efficacy is limited to levator ani syndrome. In these patients a paradoxical contraction of the pelvic floor muscles on attempted defecation has been documented in most cases and its therapeutic reversal do correlate with clinical benefit. Similar data have been also reported in constipation secondary to obstructed defecation. Electrogalvanic stimulation is somewhat effective and may be considered where high biofeedback expertise is not available. No treatment has been proven effective in unspecified functional anorectal pain where analgesic and antidepressant drugs retain a role in the absence of randomized, controlled trials.

Sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of chronic functional anorectal pain: a single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of functional anorectal pain disorders remains a challenge. The purpose of this study is to describe a single center experience with sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of chronic functional anorectal pain. METHODS: This is a retrospective study based on prospectively collected data of patients treated with sacral neuromodulation for functional anorectal pain from April 2005 to August 2008. Symptoms were analyzed using a visual analog scale pain score (0 to 10). A 7-point Likert scale was used to rate global perceived effect. All patients had a percutaneous nerve evaluation and subsequent test stimulation to assess sacral neuromodulation outcome prior to permanent implantation. Patients were eligible for permanent sacral neuromodulation in case of a pain score <3 during test stimulation and/or >50% decrease in the pain score compared to baseline. RESULTS: Nine patients (2 males) were included in this study. Mean age was 53.8 years (27.6 to 74.0). Four patients (1 male) had successful test stimulation and were eligible for permanent implantation. Median pain score decreased from 8.0 (6.0 to 9.0) to 1.0 (0 to 2.0). All patients experienced a lasting improvement during the follow-up till 24 months. Global perceived effect in successful patient was 1 (completely recovered) in one patient and 2 (much improved) in three patients. CONCLUSION: This study showed that sacral neuromodulation can be a successful treatment for functional anorectal pain not responding to other treatments. Improvement obtained during test stimulation is a good predictor (diagnostic) for sustained success of permanent sacral neuromodulation.

Evaluation of the levator ani and pelvic wall muscles in levator ani syndrome.

Chronic pelvic pain is a difficult problem to evaluate and treat. Knowledge of the pelvic floor and pelvic wall muscles may enable the provider to identify levator ani spasm syndrome, a possible cause of chronic pelvic pain.

Adjuvant biofeedback following anal sphincter repair: a randomized study.

AIMS: To evaluate the impact of adjuvant biofeedback following sphincter surgery. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients were randomized into sphincter repair or sphincter repair plus biofeedback groups. Outcome measures included a symptom questionnaire, patient's rating of satisfaction with continence function and improvement, change in continence score, quality of life and anorectal physiology. Endoanal ultrasonography was also performed pre- and post-operatively. RESULTS: Immediately following surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in any of the functional or physiological variables between the groups. Continence and patient satisfaction scores improved with a mean difference of -0.48 (95% CI: -3.30-2.33, P = 0.73) and 1.03 (95% CI: -1.40-3.46, P = 0.39), respectively. Only the difference in embarrassment scores reached statistical significance (mean) 0.56 (95% CI: 0.12-0.99, P = 0.014). Resting and squeeze pressures also improved. Thirteen of 14 in the biofeedback and 11 of 17 (control) reported symptomatic improvement. In the biofeedback group, although not statistically significant continence and satisfaction scores improved and were sustained over time. In the control group, continence and satisfaction scores changed little between 3 and 12 months (P = NS). Quality of life measures improved within the biofeedback group but there was no statistical difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: Following surgery continence function improves in all patients but adjuvant biofeedback therapy improves quality of life and maintains symptomatic improvement over time.

Biofeedback is effective treatment for levator ani syndrome.

PURPOSE: The effects of biofeedback (BF) on pain relief and anorectal physiology in patients with levator ani syndrome (LAS) were prospectively studied. METHOD: Sixteen consecutive patients (9 men, 7 women; mean age, 50.1 (range, 39-66) years) with LAS were treated with BF from July 1993 to October 1995. Mean duration of pain was 32.5 (standard error of the mean, 6.7) months. All underwent a full course of BF using a manometric balloon technique. Mean follow-up was 12.8 (standard error of the mean, 2.6) months. Pain score and anorectal physiology tests were administered prospectively by an independent observer before and after BF. RESULTS: After BF, the pain score was significantly improved (before BF: median, 8 (range, 6-10); after BF: median, 2 (range, 1-4); P < 0.02). Analgesic requirements were also significantly reduced (all 16 patients needed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) before BF; only two patients needed NSAID after BF; P < 0.03). There were no significant changes to the anorectal physiology parameters after BF. To date, there have been no side effects or regressions. CONCLUSION: Although BF had a negligible effect on anorectal physiologic measurements in LAS, it was effective in pain relief, with no side effects.

Biofeedback for intractable rectal pain: outcome and predictors of success.

PURPOSE: A number of modalities have been used for the treatment of intractable rectal pain, with varying degrees of success. Electromyography (EMG)-based biofeedback therapy has been used in the treatment of this condition during the past six years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 86 patients who completed at least one session of biofeedback for rectal pain between February 1989 and August 1995 were retrospectively reviewed. All sessions were one-hour outpatient encounters with a trained biofeedback therapist. There were 31 male and 55 female patients with a median age of 68 (range, 12-96) years. Surgery (19.8 percent) or stress (15.1 percent) were frequently cited as precipitating factors for the development of rectal pain. Eleven patients completed only one session of biofeedback and were excluded from further analysis. Of the remaining patients, 28 complained of concomitant constipation. Assessment of the benefit of therapy was based on the patients' subjective reports of the level of symptoms, aided by a linear analog scale. RESULTS: Twenty six patients (34.7 percent) reported an improvement in symptoms. Outcome was not influenced by patients' ages (P = 0.63), duration of symptoms (P = 1.0), or a prior history of surgery (P = 0.14). Alleviation of symptoms was not significantly related to the presence of paradoxical puborectalis contraction demonstrated on either EMG (P = 1) or defecography (P = 0.12). Importantly, outcome was significantly improved in patients who completed the treatment schedule compared with those who self-discharged (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although idiopathic rectal pain is difficult to treat, EMG-based biofeedback can produce alleviation of symptoms. However, success depends on patients' willingness to pursue a full course of therapy.

[Anorectal asynchronism. Clinical, manometric and therapeutic data]. / Dyssynergie anorectale. Données cliniques, manométriques et thérapeutiques.

OBJECTIVES: Anorectal asynchronism is a frequent and unrecognized cause of terminal constipation. The aim of this study was to describe clinical and instrumental findings, and results of biofeedback therapy. METHODS: From 1987 to 1991, 18 patients with anorectal asynchronism were studied then treated by biofeedback training. RESULTS: We found high rates of pelvic and perineal trauma (77.7%), of psychogenic factors (6.5%), of urinary incontinence (27.8%). The manometrical study confirmed puborectalis paradoxical contraction during defecation straining, and all the patients could not expel a rectal balloon containing 50 ml of air; non-specific manometrical abnormality was found in 44.5% patients. Excessive stamp of puborectalis muscle was always found at defecography; 77.7% of the patients had incomplete rectal evacuation, and 61.1% had an associated pelvic floor disorder. Biofeedback training was successful, and 88.9% of the patients were cured by 5 or 6 sessions. There was no predictive parameter in our study, but recovery rate seemed to be lower for patients from 45 to 55 years old. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of the anorectal asynchronism is easily made with manometry and defecography. Treatment with biofeedback gives very good results in almost all patients.

[The value and limitations of biofeedback in ano-rectal pathology]. / Intérêt et limite du biofeedback en pathologie ano-rectale.

Biofeedback, an instrumental training technique, enables the understanding and correction of a physiological mechanism, anorectal function in the present case. Correction of a functional abnormality seen as being responsible for a symptom involves the interplay of several factors within biofeedback, in particular the link between symptoms and functional abnormalities and the relationship existing between the trainer and trainee, the relative importance of which is difficult to identify. Initiation of such rehabilitation requires full clinical and functional evaluation in order to determine the indications and type of training programme required. Terminal constipation and incontinence are the chief indications providing useful results. This technique must be envisaged in the context of global management of perineal status as a whole, concomitantly with medical and surgical treatment.

Anismus: the cause of constipation? Results of investigation and treatment.

Anismus, or failure of the somatic sphincter apparatus to relax at defecation, has been implicated as a major contributor to the problem of obstructed defecation. Current diagnostic methods depend on laboratory measurements of attempted defecation and the most complex, dynamic proctography has been the mainstay of diagnosis. Using a new computerized ambulatory method of recording sphincter function in these patients at home, we report an 80% reduction in our diagnostic rate suggesting that conventional tests fail to accurately diagnose this condition, probably because they poorly represent the natural physiology of defecation. Treatment of this distressing condition is more complex and a variety of surgical and pharmacological measures have failed. Biofeedback retraining of anorectal function of these patients has been very successful and represents the management of choice.

Biofeedback defaecation training for anismus.

Anismus, paradoxical external sphincter function, spastic pelvic floor syndrome, rectoanal dysnergia, abdomino-levator incoordination for abdominopelvic asychronism, are all due to paradoxical contraction of the striated sphincter apparatus during voiding and is characterised by prolonged and excessive straining at stool. Biofeedback is the treatment of choice and has to be introduced at an early stage. We present the results of an ambulatory approach based on the integration of simulated balloon defaecation with small (50 ml) as well as constant rectal sensation volume, defaecometry and anal manometry. The pathophysiology visualised by the patient's own anorectal pressure recordings on the screen of a personal computer is explained and corrected. Sixteen patients were treated and followed for at least 1 year. Manometric data were normal except for an increased minimum residual pressure and rectal compliance. Nine patients could not evacuate a 50 ml bolus initially. Simulated defaecation became possible in seven out of these nine patients when the bolus was increased up to the individual constant rectal sensation volume. Two patients could not evacuate this volume either, while defaecation was made much less laborious in the other seven patients. Paradoxical contraction was immediately corrected in 7/16 cases. Also, as an immediate, objective benefit of a single training session, improved defaecation of a 50 ml bolus was observed in 11 patients. This effect was preserved after 6 weeks in nine cases; symptomatic recurrence did not occur in these patients during follow-up. This method of defaecation training has many advantages as compared with sphincter training using EMG electrodes eventually performed in the absence of a desire to defaecate or in lying position.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Defecography.

Defecography is a technique of examining the rectum and anal canal in which the patient is studied while sitting down rather than recumbent and recordings are obtained both at rest and during straining. The authors describe their findings in 83 patients with dyschezia. Defecation was normal in 28 patients. Prolapse of the anal mucosa was seen in 13 patients and internal procidentia in 23, 12 of whom also had intussusception manifested as rectal prolapse. A deep rectogenital fossa associated with an enterocele was seen in 16 patients; 13 had a proctocele, while fecal retention was seen in 5. Descent of the pelvic floor and changes in the angle between the rectum and anal canal were assessed. The authors recommend defecography as a more physiological means of assessing rectal dysfunction.