[Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of outlet obstructive constipation (2022 edition)].

In recent years, professional societies in China including the Chinese Medical Doctor Association Anorectal Branch have issued many clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus on constipation, which played a positive role in the standardization of diagnosis and surgical treatment of chronic constipation in China. However, the diagnosis and treatment of outlet obstructive constipation (OOC) remain controversial. OOC, the most common subtype of functional constipation, is featured by various clinical symptoms, complex pelvic floor anatomy, functional and psychological aspects. We need a gold standard supported by high-level clinical research evidence. To standardize the diagnosis and treatment process of OOC in China, Chinese Medical Doctor Association Anorectal Branch and its Clinical Guidelines Committee, and jointly sponsored by Professional Committee on Anorectal Diseases of Chinese Society of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Anorectal Disease Committee of Chinese Medical Women's Association and Chinese Constipation Medical Association, and the Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery organized and summoned a Chinese expert taskforce to focus on OOC diagnosis, classification, examination, evaluation, and various treatments (e.g. diet modification, medication, biofeedback therapy, pelvic floor function training, psychological intervention, traditional Chinese medicine and surgical treatment). Based on the latest relevant evidence in China and abroad and experts' clinical experience, the taskforce produced the " Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of outlet obstructive constipation (2022 edition)" after rounds of discussion and revision. The aim is to help anorectal surgeons make clinical decisions, standardize the process of diagnosis and treatment, reduce complications and improve clinical efficacy in OOC.

[Chinese expert consensus on clinical diagnosis and treatment of fecal incontinence (2022 edition)].

Fecal incontinence is one of the common diseases in the field of colorectal and anal surgery. Its etiology is complex, the treatment response is suboptimal, and there are controversies in clinical care. There is no consensus on the clinical practice of fecal incontinence in China currently. Launched by Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Expert Committee on Anorectal Disease of Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, and Clinical Guidelines Committee of Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, and organized by the editorial board of Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Chinese experts on this field were convened to write the Chinese expert consensus on clinical practice of fecal incontinence based on relevant references. After rounds of discussion, the final consensus combines the latest evidence and experts' clinical experience. This expert group suggested that a comprehensive assessment of fecal incontinence should be conducted before treatment, including medical history, relevant scales, physical examination and special examinations. Special examinations include anorectal endoscopy, anorectal manometry, transrectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance, rectal sensation and compliance, balloon ejection test, pelvic floor electromyography, defecography, colonoscopy and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency. Treatment methods include life style modification, medication, surgery, traditional Chinese medicine and other treatments. This consensus aims to standardize the algorithm of fecal incontinence management and improve therapeutic efficacy.

Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of outlet obstructive constipation (2022 edition) / 中华胃肠外科杂志

In recent years, professional societies in China including the Chinese Medical Doctor Association Anorectal Branch have issued many clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus on constipation, which played a positive role in the standardization of diagnosis and surgical treatment of chronic constipation in China. However, the diagnosis and treatment of outlet obstructive constipation (OOC) remain controversial. OOC, the most common subtype of functional constipation, is featured by various clinical symptoms, complex pelvic floor anatomy, functional and psychological aspects. We need a gold standard supported by high-level clinical research evidence. To standardize the diagnosis and treatment process of OOC in China, Chinese Medical Doctor Association Anorectal Branch and its Clinical Guidelines Committee, and jointly sponsored by Professional Committee on Anorectal Diseases of Chinese Society of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Anorectal Disease Committee of Chinese Medical Women's Association and Chinese Constipation Medical Association, and the Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery organized and summoned a Chinese expert taskforce to focus on OOC diagnosis, classification, examination, evaluation, and various treatments (e.g. diet modification, medication, biofeedback therapy, pelvic floor function training, psychological intervention, traditional Chinese medicine and surgical treatment). Based on the latest relevant evidence in China and abroad and experts' clinical experience, the taskforce produced the " Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of outlet obstructive constipation (2022 edition)" after rounds of discussion and revision. The aim is to help anorectal surgeons make clinical decisions, standardize the process of diagnosis and treatment, reduce complications and improve clinical efficacy in OOC.

Chinese expert consensus on clinical diagnosis and treatment of fecal incontinence (2022 edition) / 中华胃肠外科杂志

Fecal incontinence is one of the common diseases in the field of colorectal and anal surgery. Its etiology is complex, the treatment response is suboptimal, and there are controversies in clinical care. There is no consensus on the clinical practice of fecal incontinence in China currently. Launched by Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Expert Committee on Anorectal Disease of Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, and Clinical Guidelines Committee of Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, and organized by the editorial board of Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Chinese experts on this field were convened to write the Chinese expert consensus on clinical practice of fecal incontinence based on relevant references. After rounds of discussion, the final consensus combines the latest evidence and experts' clinical experience. This expert group suggested that a comprehensive assessment of fecal incontinence should be conducted before treatment, including medical history, relevant scales, physical examination and special examinations. Special examinations include anorectal endoscopy, anorectal manometry, transrectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance, rectal sensation and compliance, balloon ejection test, pelvic floor electromyography, defecography, colonoscopy and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency. Treatment methods include life style modification, medication, surgery, traditional Chinese medicine and other treatments. This consensus aims to standardize the algorithm of fecal incontinence management and improve therapeutic efficacy.

Proctalgia Syndromes: Update in Diagnosis and Management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Functional anorectal pain syndromes are a neglected yet often disabling clinical entity resulting in significant economic and psychological burden to the patient. The aim of this review is to update the practicing gastroenterologist/coloproctologist on the diagnosis and management of these complicated disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: The updated Rome foundation diagnostic criteria (Rome IV) for functional anorectal pain subgroups chronic proctalgia (levator ani syndrome and unspecified functional anorectal pain) and acute proctalgia (proctalgia fugax) on the basis of symptom duration and digital rectal examination findings. Chronic proctalgia is thought to be secondary to paradoxical pelvic floor contraction in many patients and biofeedback to improve the defecation effort has proven effective for over 90% in the short term. Unfortunately, management of proctalgia fugax remains challenging and treatment outcomes modest at best. A number of therapies to relax the pelvic floor may be employed to improve symptoms in functional anorectal pain syndromes; however, only biofeedback to improve defaecatory dynamics in patients with levator ani syndrome has proven effectiveness in a randomized setting. Further investigation of treatment approaches in proctalgia fugax is required.

Surgical treatment of idiopathic megarectum in constipated children.

BACKGROUND: Chronic constipation in children is associated with primary megarectum. This study investigated outcomes of surgical treatment of idiopathic megarectum in children. METHODS: This retrospective comparative study included 52 children with idiopathic megarectum (mean age, 9.4 ±â€¯1.7 years) treated from 2007 to 2016. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 included 23 patients who underwent a Soave pull-through operation. Group 2 included 29 children who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection with endorectal stapled anastomosis using laparoscopic ultrasound guidance. All patients had clinical and laboratory evaluations with anorectal manometry, colonoscopy and contrast enema studies. RESULTS: Six patients (26.1%) in Group 1 and one (3.5%) in Group 2 experienced anastomosis leakage requiring colostomy (χ2 = 3.867, P = 0.049). In long-term follow-up, 3 children (13.1%) in Group 1 and 2 (6.9%) in Group 2 had ongoing constipation; this difference was not significant. Frequent loose stools with soiling were significantly more common in Group 1 (14 patients; 60.9%) than in Group 2 (4 patients; 13.8%) (χ2 = 10.566, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that laparoscopic video-assisted low anterior resection of the colon with endorectal stapled anastomosis under laparoscopic ultrasound guidance to determine the level of colon resection is the better operation then Soave for children with idiopathic megarectum and chronic constipation. This approach provides good functional results and reduces complications. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Rectal Hyposensitivity Is Associated With a Defecatory Disorder But Not Delayed Colon Transit Time in a Functional Constipation Population.

The physiological mechanism of functional constipation (FC) includes defecatory disorders and delayed colon transit. About 18% to 68% constipated patients may have rectal hyposensitivity (RH). We performed this study to investigate the association between RH and functional defecatory disorder (FDD) as well as that between RH and delayed colon transit in FC patients.A total of 218 FC patients were enrolled. The constipation severity instrument (CSI) was used to assess constipation symptoms. High-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM), defecography, balloon expulsion tests, and colon transit studies were performed for each patient. RH was defined as 1 or more sensory threshold pressures raised beyond the normal range based on HR-ARM. We investigated the association between RH and constipation symptoms, and the occurrence of FDD and delayed CTT. Ninety FDD patients completed the initial phase of biofeedback treatment (BFT). We investigated the association between RH and the effect of BFT.Totally 122 (56.0%) patients had RH. The total CSI (49.82 ±â€Š1.09 vs 41.25 ±â€Š1.55, P = 0.023) and obstructive defecation subscale scores (23.19 ±â€Š0.69 vs 17.07 ±â€Š0.90, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in RH than in non-RH patients. No significant difference was observed in slow transit symptoms (21.77 ±â€Š0.72 vs 19.90 ±â€Š0.85, P = 0.121) or abdominal pain (6.85 ±â€Š2.61 vs 5.00 ±â€Š1.04, P = 0.380). The frequency of prolonged CTT was not significantly different between RH and non-RH groups (54.1% vs 58.3%, P = 0.403). RH patients rated more occurrence of FDD (72.1% vs 53.1%, P = 0.014) and dysynergic defecation (79.8% vs 50.2%, P = 0.004) than non-RH patients, whereas no differences were seen for inadequate defecatory propulsion (59.2% vs 55.0%, P = 0.589). After BFT, the proportion of "no effect" was significantly higher in the RH group than in the non-RH group (22.4% vs 9.4%, P = 0.010).RH is associated with obstructive defecation symptoms and the occurrence of FDD. Further studies are needed to detect the mechanism of RH's effect on BFT and FC.

Prospective randomized double-blind study of temporary sacral nerve stimulation in patients with rectal evacuatory dysfunction and rectal hyposensitivity.

OBJECTIVE: Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial of 14 female patients (median age 52 [30-69] years) with proctographically defined evacuatory dysfunction (ED) and demonstrable rectal hyposensitivity (elevated thresholds to balloon distension in comparison with age- and sex-matched controls). BACKGROUND: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an evolving treatment for constipation. However, variable outcomes might be improved by better patient selection. Evidence that the effect of SNS may be mediated by modulation of afferent signaling promotes a role in patients with ED associated with rectal hyposensation. METHODS: SNS was performed by the standard 2-stage technique (temporary then permanent implantation). During a 4-week period of temporary stimulation, patients were randomized ON-OFF/OFF-ON for two 2-week periods. Before insertion (PRE), and during each crossover period, primary (rectal sensory thresholds) and secondary (bowel diaries, constipation, and GIQoL [gastrointestinal quality of life] scores) outcome variables were blindly assessed. RESULTS: Thirteen patients completed the trial. Following stimulation, defecatory desire volumes to rectal balloon distension were normalized in 10 of 13 patients (PRE: mean 277 mL [234-320] vs ON: 163 mL [133-193] vs OFF: 220 mL [183-257 mL]; P = 0.006) and maximum tolerable volume in 9 of 13 (PRE: mean 350 mL [323-377] vs ON: 262 mL [219-305] vs OFF: 298 mL [256-340 mL]; P = 0.012). There was a significant increase in the percentage of successful bowel movements (PRE: median 43% [0-100] vs ON: 89% [11-100] vs OFF: 83% [11-100]; P = 0.007) and Wexner constipation scores improved (PRE: median 19 [9-26] vs ON: 10 [6-27] vs OFF: 13 [5-29]; P = 0.01). There were no significant changes in disease-specific or generic quality of life measures. Eleven patients progressed to permanent stimulation (9/11 success at 19 months). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with chronic constipation secondary to ED with rectal hyposensitivity responded to temporary SNS. The physiological results presented support a mechanistic role for rectal afferent modulation.

Argón plasma y oxígeno hiperbárico para el control de la rectorragia crónica secundaria a la proctopatía por radiación / Argon plasma coagulation and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in chronic radiation proctopathy, effectiveness and impact on tissue toxicity

Introducción: la proctopatía por radiación (PPR) se asocia con rectorragía recurrente y requerimientos de trasfusiones. La coagulación con argón plasma (APC) y la terapia con oxígeno hiperbárico (HOT) han sido efectivas en el control de la PPR. No hay estudios prospectivos comparativos entre ambas técnicas. Objetivo: el objetivo del estudio es evaluar la efectividad, seguridad y el impacto en la toxicidad tisular de la APC comparado con el HOT en los pacientes con PR. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio prospectivo para evaluar la respuesta al tratamiento. Se incluyeron a pacientes con cáncer cervicouterino y PPR con rectorragia recurrente, sin haber recibido tratamientos previos. Se tomaron datos demográficos, dosis de radiación, duración y severidad de la rectorragia, niveles de hemoglobina, requerimientos de trasfusiones y la toxicidad tisular (Cuestionario de SOMA-LENT) al inicio, y a los 1, 2 y 3 meses del tratamiento. Resultados: se incluyeron a 31 pacientes con PPR, 14 en el grupo de APC y 17 en el grupo de HOT. No hubo respuesta en el 13 y 18% de los pacientes en el grupo de APC y OHT respectivamente (p = NS). Al primer y segundo mes de seguimiento, el grupo APC mostró una mejoría significativa en los parámetros de requerimientos trasfusionales (0,6 vs. 3,4 y 0,7 vs. 2,5) y en la toxicidad tisular (5,3 vs. 8,6 y 3,8 vs. 7,2). Después de 3 meses de seguimiento, ambos grupos mostraron mejoría en todos los parámetros sin haber diferencias estadísticamente significativas. Conclusiones: APC y HOT fueron efectivos, seguros y disminuyeron la toxicidad tisular en los pacientes con PPR. Sin embargo la respuesta fue más efectiva y rápida en el grupo del APC(AU)

Background: chronic radiation proctopathy (CRP) is associated with recurrent rectal bleeding and transfusional requirements. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HOT) have been shown to be effective in the control of CRP. No prospective comparisons have been reported between these treatments. Aim: the aim was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and impact on tissue toxicity of APC compared to HOT in patients with CRP. Material and methods: a prospective study for evaluating treatment response was conducted. Patients with cervical cancer and CRP with rectal bleeding were recruited. They had not received previous treatment. Collected data included: demographics, previous radiation dosage, duration and severity of rectal bleeding. Hemoglobin, transfusional requirements, and tissue toxicity (SOMA LENT questionnaire) at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 months follow up were recorded. Results: thirty-one patients were included, 14 in the APC group and 17 in the HOT group. No response was noted in 13 and 18% of patients in the APC and HOT group respectively (p = NS). At the 1 and 2 months follow-up, the APC group showed a significantly better response in terms of transfusional requirements (0.6 vs. 3.4 and 0.7 vs. 2.5) and tissue toxicity score (5.3 vs. 8.6 and 3.8 vs. 7.248). After 3 months, both groups showed further improvement in all parameters without significant differences between them. Conclusions: APC and HOT were effective, safe and decreased the tissue toxicity scores in patients with CRP. However, response rate was higher and faster in the APC group(AU)

A rare cause of chronic rectal bleeding in children; solitary rectal ulcer: case report.

Solitary rectal ulcer causing lower gastrointestinal bleeding is extremely rare in children. Rare presentation, non-specific symptoms, insufficient experience, and characteristics mimicking other rectal diseases may cause misdiagnosis or delay of diagnosis in some pediatric patients. Here, we report a 10-year-old boy with solitary rectal ulcer diagnosed two years after onset of the symptoms who responded well to the conservative therapy, including high-fiber diet, laxatives, defecation training, and sucralfate enema.

The morbidity of constipation in patients with anorectal malformations.

BACKGROUND: Constipation in anorectal malformations (ARM) is extremely common, particularly in the lower types. Failure to adequately treat it can lead to significant morbidity. METHODS: From our series of over 2000 patients with ARM, we reviewed 398 with good prognosis for bowel control and a tendency toward constipation; rectoperineal fistula (63), rectovestibular fistula (114), rectobulbar urethral fistula (104), imperforate anus with no fistula (46), rectal atresia or stenosis (9), and cloaca with a common channel below 3 cm (62). Those lost to follow-up, not yet toilet-trained (<3 years old), or with poor prognostic features were excluded. We compared morbidities in patients we operated on and managed primarily (group A, n = 268) to those managed at other institutions who suffered from constipation or incontinence and were referred to us for treatment (group B, n = 130). Those we managed primarily were subjected to an aggressive senna-based laxative program, started after their primary repair or after colostomy closure. RESULTS: Morbidities associated with constipation were higher in the referral group and included fecal impaction (7.8% vs 38.5%), overflow pseudoincontinence (4.9% vs 33.8%), and megacolon (14.6% vs 54.6%). A loop or transverse colostomy (4.9% vs 9.2%), stoma or anorectal stricture, or a stenotic fistula (2.2% vs 28.5%) were contributing factors. Adequate laxative treatment with, in certain cases, resection of a megarectosigmoid (2.6% vs 23.1%) enabled many pseudoincontinent children to achieve bowel control (reported previously). Unneeded colorectal biopsies (1.9% vs 16.2%), Hirschsprung's-type pullthroughs (0% vs 3.1%), and, in retrospect, unneeded antegrade continent enema procedures (0% vs 3.1%) were higher in Group B. Overall, 19.8% of Group A and 66.2% of Group B experienced constipation-related morbidities. CONCLUSION: The morbidity of constipation in ARM includes fecal impaction, megacolon, incontinence, and performance of unneeded surgeries. Inadequate treatment, the type of the original colostomy, and postoperative anal or stomal stricture as well as stenotic fistulae were key contributing factors. Children with ARM and good prognosis for bowel control are at the greatest risk for severe constipation and its consequences. With recognition and aggressive, proactive treatment, we have found that these morbidities can be reduced.

Healing of solitary rectal ulcers with multiple sessions of argon plasma coagulation.

BACKGROUND: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is an uncommon disorder of evacuation. Management of bleeding ulcers is usually unsatisfactory with conventional treatment. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) has been reported to control bleeding; however, it has not been shown to result in ulcer healing. The aim of the present study was to: (i) to investigate the efficacy and safety of APC in controlling bleeding from SRUS; and (ii) to study its efficacy in the healing of ulcer/s. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with bleeding SRUS diagnosed on clinical, colonoscopic, and histological findings were randomized to receive either standard care alone (12 patients) or to undergo multiple sessions of APC in addition (12 patients). All patients were followed up to determine ulcer healing. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with a mean duration of symptoms of 12.6 +/- 4.8 months were included. Bleeding was controlled with one (n = 5) or two sessions (n = 7) of APC. Reduction in size and depth of ulcer was noted. Eight out of 12 patients who received APC had complete healing of ulcers after four to eight sessions, carried out 2-4 weeks apart. The remaining four patients had a reduction in size and depth of ulcers compared to their pretreatment appearance. All patients were advised to have a high intake of fluids, fiber and laxatives, and to undergo biofeedback and behavior modification therapy in addition to the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: APC controls bleeding in patients with SRUS and it also improves the healing of these ulcers.

Healing of a bleeding solitary rectal ulcer with multiple sessions of argon plasma.

BACKGROUND: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is an uncommon disorder of evacuation. Management of bleeding ulcers is usually unsatisfactory with conventional treatments. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) has been reported in case reports to control bleeding; however, it has not been shown to result in ulcer healing. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of APC in controlling bleeding from SRUS and to study its efficacy in eventual healing of ulcers. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial of the management of 24 consecutive patients with SRUS. SETTING: The gastroenterology unit at 2 tertiary care hospitals. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients with bleeding SRUS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Control of bleeding and endoscopic healing of SRUS. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with bleeding SRUS, whose diagnoses were based on clinical, colonoscopic, and histologic findings, were randomized to receive either standard care only (12 patients, biofeedback therapy [BT] group) or multiple sessions of APC in addition to BT (12 patients, APC group). All patients were advised to intake a high level of fluids and fibers, laxatives, biofeedback, and behavior modification therapy in addition to the treatment. Patients were followed to determine whether ulcers healed. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with symptoms that lasted 12.6 +/- 4.8 months were included. Bleeding was controlled in all 12 patients in the APC group, but only in 5 of 12 patients in BT group. We also made the following observations about healing of the ulcers: 8 of 12 patients in the APC group had complete healing of their ulcers after 4 to 8 sessions, whereas in the BT group, ulcers healed in only 2 of 12 patients. CONCLUSIONS: APC controls the bleeding in patients with SRUS and also improves the healing of these ulcers.

[Treatment of functional diseases after rectum anal surgery: effectiveness of rehabilitation of the pelvic pavement]. / Trattamento dei disturbi funzionali dopo la chirurgia retto-anale: efficacia della riabilitazione del pavimento pelvico.

AIM: Anorectal dysfunction is routinely treated at the Center for Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation, San Giovanni University Hospital, Turin, Italy. Of a total of 147 patients treated between April 2007 and May 2008, 44 (30%) received pelvic floor rehabilitation following anorectal surgery. With this study we wanted to evaluate the response of patients with constipation and/or fecal incontinence to postsurgical pelvic floor rehabilitation designed to regain full or partial anorectal function and so improve their quality of life. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population was 44 patients, subdivided into 3 groups. One group (n=25) consisted of patients with fecal incontinence, which was further split into two subgroups: subgroup A (n=10) with direct involvement of the anal sphincter at surgery and subgroup B (n=15) without sphincter involvement. The second group (n=12) included patients with constipation. The third group (n=7) included patients with constipation and incontinence; this group was further split into 2 subgroups: those in which constipation (n=5) and those in which incontinence (n=2) was predominant. Pre- and postrehabilitation anorectal function was compared using two types of assessment: 1) clinical evaluation with the Wexner incontinence scale and 2) diagnostic evaluation with anorectal manometry in patients with fecal incontinence (plus transanal sonography to determine anatomic damage in the subgroups in which the sphincter had been involved) and defecography in those with constipation (plus transit radiography to exclude intestinal colic-associated constipation). RESULTS: The number of patients classified as having severe incontinence decreased from 8 to 1 (-87.5%), those with moderate incontinence decreased from 8 to 4 (-50%); 20 out of 25 patients presented with mild dysfunction at the end of the rehabilitation program. No difference in response to treatment was found between the two subgroups of patients with fecal incontinence nor among those with constipation. Of those with predominant constipation, none were classified as having severe dysfunction; the number of those with moderate dysfunction decreased from 13 to 7 (-54%). CONCLUSIONS: The study results show that, when sufficiently motivated, patients with fecal incontinence and constipation following anorectal surgery respond positively to pelvic floor rehabilitation.

Dyssynergic defecation and biofeedback therapy.

Constipation caused by dyssynergic defecation is common and affects up to one half of patients with this disorder. It is possible to diagnose this problem through history, prospective stool diaries, and anorectal physiologic tests. Randomized controlled trials have now established that biofeedback therapy is not only efficacious but superior to other modalities and that the symptom improvement is caused by a change in underlying pathophysiology. Development of user friendly approaches to biofeedback therapy and use of home biofeedback programs will significantly enhance the adoption of this treatment by gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons.

Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction syndrome: results and follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to assess safety, effectiveness, and long-term outcomes of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for the cure of outlet obstruction syndrome (OOS). METHODS: Data were collected over a 3-year period (2004-2007), at the Department of Surgery of the University of Genoa, from 25 consecutive subjects (19 of them females) undergoing STARR because of OOS that had not responded to medical treatment,. RESULTS: Preoperatively, patients were submitted to clinical examination, defecography, colonoscopy, manometry, and recto-anal reflexes determination. All patients had mucosal prolapse, 15 rectal intussusception, 15 rectocele. Postoperatively no deaths were observed; one patient had a hemorrhage requiring reintervention. Mean time to resumption of normal activity was 8.5 +/- 4.5 days. Patients were followed for a mean of 24.7 +/- 10.9 months (range: 6-42 months). Late specific complications included 3 cases of urge to defecate, 8 of incontinence to flatus. Functional outcome was positive for 22 patients (excellent in 4 cases, good in 15, fairly good in 3). Six months postoperatively (25 s), patients had improvement of the mean Constipation Score (p = 0.0002), less pain during evacuation (p = 0.0003), and reduced use of digital assistance to defecate (p < 0.0001). Continence Grading Scale and enema use remained stable after intervention. Patients had increase in basal sphincter pressure (p = 0.0078) and maximal squeeze pressure (p = 0.0051). Recto-anal reflex study showed increase in abdominal pain threshold (p < 0.0001); anal sphincter relaxation threshold and desire to defecate threshold did not change. CONCLUSIONS: According to the present study, STARR seemed to be a safe and effective treatment for OOS associated with symptomatic rectocele and intussusception.

Poor symptomatic relief and quality of life in patients treated for "solitary rectal ulcer syndrome without external rectal prolapse".

BACKGROUND: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a chronic disabling condition. Several therapeutic options have been advocated including conservative approaches and surgery, bringing into question their functional outcomes. This study aimed to assess treatment procedures on both anorectal complaints and quality of life (QoL) using standardised self-administered questionnaires. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients who underwent treatments for SRUS in two referral centres were reviewed. A standardised self-administered questionnaire including incontinence (Cleveland Clinic), constipation (Knowles-Eccersley-Scott symptom, KESS) and gastrointestinal quality of life index validated scoring systems was mailed to each patient (median follow-up, 36 months). Correlation between treatment options, functional results and quality of life was analysed. RESULTS: The mean Cleveland Clinic and KESS scores were respectively 5.3+/-5.8 (normal 0) and 19.1+/-8 (normal<9). The mean QoL score reached 89+/-28.8 (normal 125). A linear correlation between the QoL score and functional results was observed. There was no influence of treatment options on QoL results. A multivariate analysis identified five parameters predictive of a better QoL: presence of paradoxical puborectalis contraction, absence of descending perineum, absence of procidentia, age<40 and treatment exclusively based on laxatives. CONCLUSION: Despite several therapeutic options including surgery, patients with SRUS still frequently complain of disturbed anorectal function and significant alteration of their QoL.

Stapled transanal rectal resection in solitary rectal ulcer associated with prolapse of the rectum: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: At present, none of the conventional surgical treatments of solitary rectal ulcer associated with internal rectal prolapse seems to be satisfactory because of the high incidence of recurrence. The stapled transanal rectal resection has been demonstrated to successfully cure patients with internal rectal prolapse associated with rectocele, or prolapsed hemorrhoids. This prospective study was designed to evaluate the short-term and long-term results of stapled transanal rectal resection in patients affected by solitary rectal ulcer associated with internal rectal prolapse and nonresponders to biofeedback therapy. METHODS: Fourteen patients were selected on the basis of validated constipation and continence scorings, clinical examination, anorectal manometry, defecography, and colonoscopy and were submitted to biofeedback therapy. Ten nonresponders were operated on and followed up with incidence of failure, defined as no improvement of symptoms and/or recurrence of rectal ulceration, as the primary outcome measure. Operative time, hospital stay, postoperative pain, time to return to normal activity, overall patient satisfaction index, and presence of residual rectal prolapse also were evaluated. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 27.2 (range, 24-34) months, symptoms significantly improved, with 80 percent of excellent/good results and none of the ten operated patients showed a recurrence of rectal ulcer. Operative time, hospital stay, and time to return to normal activity were similar to those reported after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation, whereas postoperative pain was slightly higher. One patient complained of perineal abscess, requiring surgery. DISCUSSION: The stapled transanal rectal resection is safe and effective in the cure of solitary rectal ulcer associated with internal rectal prolapse, with minimal complications and no recurrences after two years. Randomized trials with sufficient number of patients are necessary to compare the efficacy of stapled transanal rectal resection with the traditional surgical treatments of this rare condition.