Neonatal admission and mortality in babies born in UK alongside midwifery units: a national population-based case-control study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS).

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of and risk factors for neonatal unit admission, intrapartum stillbirth or neonatal death without admission, and describe outcomes, in babies born in an alongside midwifery unit (AMU). DESIGN: National population-based case-control study. METHOD: We used the UK Midwifery Study System to identify and collect data about 1041 women who gave birth in AMUs, March 2017 to February 2018, whose babies were admitted to a neonatal unit or died (cases) and 1984 controls from the same AMUs. We used multivariable logistic regression, generating adjusted OR (aOR) with 95% CIs, to investigate maternal and intrapartum factors associated with neonatal admission or mortality. RESULTS: The incidence of neonatal admission or mortality following birth in an AMU was 1.2%, comprising neonatal admission (1.2%) and mortality (0.01%). White 'other' ethnicity (aOR=1.28; 95% CI=1.01 to 1.63); nulliparity (aOR=2.09; 95% CI=1.78 to 2.45); ≥2 previous pregnancies ≥24 weeks' gestation (aOR=1.38; 95% CI=1.10 to 1.74); male sex (aOR=1.46; 95% CI=1.23 to 1.75); maternal pregnancy problem (aOR=1.40; 95% CI=1.03 to 1.90); prolonged (aOR=1.42; 95% CI=1.01 to 2.01) or unrecorded (aOR=1.38; 95% CI=1.05 to 1.81) second stage duration; opiate use (aOR=1.31; 95% CI=1.02 to 1.68); shoulder dystocia (aOR=5.06; 95% CI=3.00 to 8.52); birth weight <2500 g (aOR=4.12; 95% CI=1.97 to 8.60), 4000-4999 g (aOR=1.64; 95% CI=1.25 to 2.14) and ≥4500 g (aOR=2.10; 95% CI=1.17 to 3.76), were independently associated with neonatal admission or mortality. Among babies admitted (n=1038), 18% received intensive care. Nine babies died, six following neonatal admission. Sepsis (52%) and respiratory distress (42%) were the most common discharge diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study are in line with other evidence on risk factors for neonatal admission, and reassuring in terms of the quality and safety of care in AMUs.

Improving maternal and newborn care: cost-effectiveness of an innovation to rebrand traditional birth attendants in Sierra Leone.

OBJECTIVES: This paper evaluates the cost-effectiveness of rebranding former traditional birth attendants (TBAs) to conduct health promotion activities and refer women to health facilities. METHODS: The project used 200 former TBAs, 100 of whom were also enrolled in a small income generating business. The evaluation had a three-arm, quasiexperimental design with baseline and endline household surveys. The three arms were: (a) Health promotion (HP) only; (b) Health promotion plus business (HP+); and (c) the comparison group. The Lives Saved Tool is used to estimate the number of lives saved. RESULTS: The HP+ intervention had a statistically significant impact on health facility delivery and four or more antenatal care (ANC) visits during pregnancy. The cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated at US$4130 per life year saved in the HP only arm, and US$1539 in the HP+ arm. Therefore, only the HP+ intervention is considered to be cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: It is critical to prioritize cost-effective interventions such as, in the case of rural Sierra Leone, community-based strategies involving rebranding TBAs as health promoters and enrolling them in health-related income generating activities.

Understanding the Mothers of Children with Spina Bifida and Hydrocephalus in Tanzania.

OBJECTIVE: To identify if there are cultural, medical, educational, economic, nutritional and geographic barriers to the prevention and treatment of spina bifida and hydrocephalus. METHODS: The mothers of infants with spina bifida and hydrocephalus admitted to Muhimbilli Orthopaedic Institute, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania, between 2013 and 2014 were asked to complete a questionnaire. A total of 299 infants were identified: 65 with myelomeningoceles, 19 with encephaloceles, and 215 with isolated hydrocephalus. The questionnaire was completed by 294 of the mothers. RESULTS: There was a high variation in the geographic origin of the mothers. Approximately 85% traveled from outside of Dar Es Salaam. The mean age was 29 (15-45) years old with a parity of 3 (1-10). The rates of consanguinity, obesity, antiepileptic medication, HIV seropositivity, and family history were 2%, 13%, 0%, 2%, and 2%, respectively. A maize-based diet was found in 84%, and only 3% of woman took folic acid supplementation, despite 61% of mothers stating that they wished to conceive another baby. Unemployment was high (77%), a low level of education was common (76% not attended any school or obtaining a primary level only), and 20% were single mothers. Hospital only was the preferred method of treatment for 94% of the mothers, and 85% of the babies were born in a hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights some of the cultural, educational, geographic, nutritional, and economic difficulties in the prevention and management of spina bifida and hydrocephalus in Tanzania.

Neonatal mortality in the United States is related to location of birth (hospital versus home) rather than the type of birth attendant.

BACKGROUND: Planned home births have leveled off in the United States in recent years after a significant rise starting in the mid-2000s. Planned home births in the United States are associated with increased patient-risk profiles. Multiple studies concluded that, compared with hospital births, absolute and relative risks of perinatal mortality and morbidity in US planned home births are significantly increased. OBJECTIVE: To explore the safety of birth in the United States by comparing the neonatal mortality outcomes of 2 locations, hospital birth and home birth, by 4 types of attendants: hospital midwife; certified nurse-midwife at home; direct-entry ("other") midwife at home; and attendant at home not identified, using the most recent US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention natality data on neonatal mortality for planned home births in the United States. Outcomes are presented as absolute risks (neonatal mortality per 10,000 live births) and as relative risks of neonatal mortality (hospital-certified nurse-midwife odds ratio, 1) overall, and for recognized risk factors. STUDY DESIGN: We used the most current US Centers for Disease and Prevention Control Linked Birth and Infant Death Records for 2010-2017 to assess neonatal mortality (neonatal death days 0-27 after birth) for single, term (37+ weeks), normal-weight ( >2499 g) infants for planned home births and hospital births by birth attendants: hospital-certified nurse-midwives, home-certified nurse-midwives, home other midwives (eg, lay or direct-entry midwives), and other home birth attendant not identified. RESULTS: The neonatal mortality for US hospital midwife-attended births was 3.27 per 10,000 live births, 13.66 per 10,000 live births for all planned home births, and 27.98 per 10,000 live births for unintended/unplanned home births. Planned home births attended by direct-entry midwives and by certified nurse-midwives had a significantly elevated absolute and relative neonatal mortality risk compared with certified nurse-midwife-attended hospital births (hospital-certified nurse-midwife: 3.27/10,000 live births odds ratio, 1; home birth direct-entry midwives: neonatal mortality 12.44/10,000 live births, odds ratio, 3.81, 95% confidence interval, 3.12-4.65, P<.0001; home birth-certified nurse-midwife: neonatal mortality 9.48/10,000 live births, odds ratio, 2.90, 95% confidence interval, 2.90; P<.0001). These differences increased further when patients were stratified for recognized risk factors. CONCLUSION: The safety of birth in the United States varies by location and attendant. Compared with US hospital births attended by a certified nurse-midwife, planned US home births for all types of attendants are a less safe setting of birth, especially when recognized risk factors are taken into account. The type of midwife attending US planned home birth appears to have no differential effect on decreasing the absolute and relative risk of neonatal mortality of planned home birth, because the difference in outcomes of US planned home births attended by direct-entry midwives or by certified nurse-midwives is not statistically significant.

Exploring women's preferences for birth settings in England: A discrete choice experiment.

OBJECTIVE: To explore pregnant women's preferences for birth setting in England. DESIGN: Labelled discrete choice experiment (DCE). SETTING: Online survey. SAMPLE: Pregnant women recruited through social media and an online panel. METHODS: We developed a DCE to assess women's preferences for four hypothetical birth settings based on seven attributes: reputation, continuity of care, distance from home, time to see a doctor, partner able to stay overnight, chance of straightforward birth and safety for baby. We used a mixed logit model, with setting modelled as an alternative-specific constant, and conducted a scenario analysis to evaluate the impact of changes in attribute levels on uptake of birth settings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women's preferences for birth setting. RESULTS: 257 pregnant women completed the DCE. All birth setting attributes, except 'time to see doctor', were significant in women's choice (p<0.05). There was significant heterogeneity in preferences for some attributes. Changes to levels for 'safety for the baby' and 'partner able to stay overnight' were associated with larger changes from baseline uptake of birth setting. If the preferences identified were translated into the real-world context up to a third of those who reported planning birth in an obstetric unit might choose a midwifery unit assuming universal access to all settings, and knowledge of the differences between settings. CONCLUSIONS: We found that 'safety for the baby', 'chance of a straightforward birth' and 'can the woman's partner stay overnight following birth' were particularly important in women's preferences for hypothetical birth setting. If all birth settings were available to women and they were aware of the differences between them, it is likely that more low risk women who currently plan birth in OUs might choose a midwifery unit.

Effect of Birth Preparedness on Institutional Delivery in Semiurban Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Ethiopia has one of the lowest rates of facility delivery and is promoting birth preparedness among pregnant women through its community health services to increase the rate of institutional delivery and reduce maternal mortality. Observational studies of birth preparedness in Ethiopia have thus far only reported the marginal effect of birth preparedness when controlling for other factors, such as parity and education. OBJECTIVES: In this cross-sectional study, we use propensity score modeling to estimate the average population-level effect of birth preparedness on the likelihood of delivering at a facility. METHODS: We conducted secondary analysis of household survey data collected from 215 women with a recent live birth within the catchment areas of 10 semi-urban health centers. A mother was considered well prepared for birth if she reported completing four of the following six actions: identified a skilled provider, identified an institution, saved money, identified transport, prepared clean delivery materials, and prepared food. We performed unadjusted and multivariate logistic regression analyses, with and without propensity score weighting, to assess the relationship between birth preparedness and institutional delivery. FINDINGS: One hundred respondents (47%) delivered in an institution, and over two-thirds (151, 71%) were considered well prepared for birth. Institutional delivery was more common among women who were considered well prepared (57%) versus those who were considered not well prepared (19%). In the model with propensity score weighting, women who were well prepared for birth had 3.83 times higher odds of delivering at a facility (95% CI: 1.41-10.40, p-value = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to existing evidence supporting the inclusion of antenatal birth preparedness counseling as a part of an antenatal care package for promoting institutional delivery. Important gaps remain in operationalizing the definition of birth preparedness and understanding the pathway from exposure to outcome.

[Planned location for delivery; no relationship with maternal or neonatal morbidity]. / Geplande locatie van bevalling.

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of planned primary-care birth-centre deliveries with those of planned home deliveries and planned outpatient deliveries. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHOD: We used data collected in the period February 2009 to November 2013 from 4 community midwife practices attached to the Sophia birth centre (GCS), which is attached to the Erasmus MC academic hospital in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. We included women with low-risk pregnancies for whom primary-care midwives were responsible at the start of the delivery. Pregnant women were stratified according to planned location of delivery (home, outpatient or GCS). The most important outcome measures were: medical intervention during the delivery, and maternal or neonatal morbidity. We used 'propensity score matching' to correct for confounding factors. RESULTS: We included a total of 6185 pregnant women in our study. After propensity score matching, no statistically significant difference was seen in the total number of medical interventions during pregnancy, total maternal morbidity and total neonatal morbidity between pregnant women with planned home deliveries and those with planned GCS deliveries. (Medical interventions 13.6% and 12.4%, respectively; p-value 0.56. Maternal morbidity 4.9% and 5.7%, respectively; p-value 0.53. Neonatal morbidity 6.8% and 5.4%, respectively; p-value 0.31.) Similar results were seen when we compared pregnant women with planned outpatient deliveries with pregnant women with planned deliveries in the GCS. CONCLUSION: In women with low-risk pregnancies the planned location for delivery does not seem to be related to either the number of medical interventions during pregnancy or to maternal or neonatal morbidity. The GCS seems, therefore, to be an appropriate location for these women to deliver, but this should be confirmed by further studies.

A cosmopolítica da gestação, do parto e do pós-parto: autoatenção e medicalização entre os índios Munduruku / The cosmopolitics of pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum: self-attention and medicalization among Munduruku Indians

A pesquisadora Raquel Paiva Dias-Scopel, do Instituto Leônidas e Maria Deane (ILMD/Fiocruz Amazônia), levanta questões sobre a valorização e respeito à diversidade étnica e cultural dos povos indígenas e a difícil interface com o processos de medicalização e do direito ao acesso aos serviços de saúde biomédicos. O livro é parte da Coleção Saúde dos Povos Indígenas, da Editora Fiocruz e partiu da tese de doutorado defendida em 2014 no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia Social da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Foi publicado pela primeira vez em 2015 pela Associação Brasileira de Antropologia com o título A Cosmopolítica da Gestação, Parto e Pós-Parto: práticas de autoatenção e processo de medicalização entre os índios Munduruku. No prefácio da primeira edição, sua orientadora, a doutora em antropologia e professora titular da UFSC, Esther Jean Langdon, ressalta que o conceito fundamental deste livro é da autoatenção, que aponta para o reconhecimento da autonomia e da criatividade da coletividade, principalmente da família, como núcleo que articula os diferentes modelos de atenção ou cuidado da saúde.