Unraveling the potential of Morinda officinalis oligosaccharides as an adjuvant of escitalopram in depression treatment and exploring the underlying mechanisms.

ETHNOPHAMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Morinda officinalis oligosaccharides (MOs) is a mixture of oligosaccharides extracted from the roots of Morinda officinalis (MO). It is approved by Chinese Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) for depression treatment. MOs could improve the antidepressant efficacy of escitalopram in clinic. AIM OF THE STUDY: We aim to explore the antidepressant activity and potential mechanism of the combination usage of MOs and escitalopram on animal model of depression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Depressive animal model was induced by chronic mild stress (CMS). Behavioral tests were conducted to evaluate the antidepressant efficacy of MOs and escitalopram. Serum neurotransmitter levels were detected by High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Quantitative real-time PCR and Western blotting were applied to assay the hippocampus neurotrophic factors' mRNA and protein levels. Peripheral cytokines levels were measured through Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Micorglia polization phenotype was assayed by immunofluorescence and flow cytometry. RESULTS: MOs and escitalopram obviously attenuated depression-like behaviors of CMS mice. Importantly, MOs plus escitalopram exhibited better antidepressant activity on CMS mice than monotherapy. At the same time, MOs combined escitalopram treatment significantly increased hippocampus neurotransmitters and neurotrophic factor levels, stimulated hippocampus neurogenesis and relieved central nervous system (CNS) microglia over-activation of CMS mice. The combination therapy had greater effect on neuroprotection and inflammation attenuation of CMS mice than monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our results indicates MOs combined escitalopram might produce antidepressant activity through protecting neuron activity, relieving inflammation and modulating microglia polarization process.

Unraveling the potential of vitamins C and D as adjuvants in depression treatment with escitalopram in an LPS animal model.

Depression is linked with oxidative stress and inflammation, where key players include nitric oxide (NO), nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), and Heme Oxidase-1 (HO-1). Augmenting the efficacy of antidepressants represents a compelling avenue of exploration. We explored the potential of vitamins C and D as adjuncts to escitalopram (Esc) in a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced depression model focusing on the aforementioned biomarkers. Male Swiss albino mice were stratified into distinct groups: control, LPS, LPS + Esc, LPS + Esc + Vit C, LPS + Esc + Vit D, and LPS + Esc + Vit C + Vit D. After a 7-day treatment period, a single LPS dose (2 mg/kg), was administered, followed by comprehensive assessments of behavior and biochemical parameters. Notably, a statistically significant (p < 0.05) alleviation of depressive symptoms was discerned in the Esc + Vit C + Vit D group versus the LPS group, albeit with concomitant pronounced sedation evident in all LPS-treated groups (p < 0.05). Within the cortex, LPS reduced (p < 0.05) the expression levels of NOx, Nrf2, BDNF, and HO-1, with only HO-1 being reinstated to baseline in the LPS + Esc + Vit D and the LPS + Esc + Vit C + Vit D groups. Conversely, the hippocampal NOx, Nrf2, and HO-1 levels remained unaltered following LPS administration. Notably, the combination of Esc, Vit C, and Vit D effectively restored hippocampal BDNF levels, which had been diminished by Esc alone. In conclusion, vitamins C and D enhance the therapeutic effects of escitalopram through a mechanism independent of Nrf2. These findings underscore the imperative need for in-depth investigations.

S-Adenosylmethionine (SAMe) as an adjuvant therapy for patients with depression: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is an intractable disease requiring long-term treatment. S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe), a natural substance, has antidepressant effects, but the exact effect remains unclear. This study examines the evidence concerning the efficacy of SAMe as a monotherapy or in combination with antidepressants. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane electronic databases were searched for meta-analyses of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) until June 30, 2023. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the enrolled trials that met the inclusion criteria, with the aim to compare the effects of SAMe to those of a placebo or active agents, or SAMe combined with other antidepressants in the treatment of MDD. RESULTS: Fourteen trials, with a total of 1522 subjects, were included in this review. The daily dose of SAMe varied from 200 to 3200 mg and the study duration ranged between 2 and 12 weeks. The results of SAMe versus placebo as a monotherapy, SAMe versus imipramine or escitalopram as a monotherapy, and SAMe versus placebo as an adjunctive therapy, showed no significant difference in depression with SAMe compared to the comparison treatment. CONCLUSIONS: SAMe may provide relief of depression symptoms similar to imipramine or escitalopram. However, the results of the comparisons should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of studies and the large range of SAMe doses that were used in the included trials. Therefore, we recommend that patients discuss treatment options with their doctor before taking SAMe.

Escitalopram-induced QTc prolongation and its relationship with KCNQ1, KCNE1, and KCNH2 gene polymorphisms.

BACKGROUND: Escitalopram can cause prolongation of the QT interval on the electrocardiogram (ECG). However, only some patients get pathological QTc prolongation in clinic. We investigated the influence of KCNQ1, KCNE1, and KCNH2 gene polymorphisms along with clinical factors on escitalopram-induced QTc prolongation. METHODS: A total of 713 patients prescribed escitalopram were identified and had at least one ECG recording in this retrospective study. 472 patients with two or more ECG data were divided into QTc prolongation (n = 119) and non-prolongation (n = 353) groups depending on the threshold change in QTc of 30 ms above baseline value (∆QTc ≥ 30 ms). 45 patients in the QTc prolongation group and 90 patients in the QTc non-prolongation group were genotyped for 43 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of KCNQ1, KCNE1, and KCNH2 genes. RESULTS: Patients with QTc prolongation (∆QTc ≥ 30 ms) got higher escitalopram dose (10.3 mg) than patients without QTc prolongation (9.4 mg), although no significant relationship was found between QTc interval and escitalopram dose in the linear mixed model. Patients who were older/coronary disease/hypertension or carried with KCNE1 rs1805127 C allele, KCNE1 rs4817668 C allele, KCNH2 rs3807372 AG/GG genotype were significantly at risk for QTc prolongation (∆QTc ≥ 30 ms). Concomitant antipsychotic treatment was associated with a longer QTc interval. LIMITATIONS: A relatively small sample size and lack of the blood concentration of escitalopram restricted the accurate relationship between escitalopram dose and QTc interval. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that KCNQ1, KCNE1, and KCNH2 gene polymorphisms along with clinical factors provide a complementary effect in escitalopram-induced QTc prolongation.

Attenuation of Anxiety-Potentiated Startle After Treatment With Escitalopram or Mindfulness Meditation in Anxiety Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Biological markers for anxiety disorders may further understanding of disorder pathophysiology and suggest potential targeted treatments. The fear-potentiated startle (FPS) (a measure of startle to predictable threat) and anxiety-potentiated startle (APS) (startle to unpredictable threat) laboratory paradigm has been used to detect physiological differences in individuals with anxiety disorders compared with nonanxious control individuals, and in pharmacological challenge studies in healthy adults. However, little is known about how startle may change with treatment for anxiety disorders, and no data are available regarding alterations due to mindfulness meditation training. METHODS: Ninety-three individuals with anxiety disorders and 66 healthy individuals completed 2 sessions of the neutral, predictable, and unpredictable threat task, which employs a startle probe and the threat of shock to assess moment-by-moment fear and anxiety. Between the two testing sessions, patients received randomized 8-week treatment with either escitalopram or mindfulness-based stress reduction. RESULTS: APS, but not FPS, was higher in participants with anxiety disorders compared with healthy control individuals at baseline. Further, there was a significantly greater decrease in APS for both treatment groups compared with the control group, with the patient groups showing reductions bringing them into the range of control individuals at the end of the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Both anxiety treatments (escitalopram and mindfulness-based stress reduction) reduced startle potentiation during unpredictable (APS) but not predictable (FPS) threat. These findings further validate APS as a biological correlate of pathological anxiety and provide physiological evidence for the impact of mindfulness-based stress reduction on anxiety disorders, suggesting that there may be comparable effects of the two treatments on anxiety neurocircuitry.

Adverse drug events associated with nortriptyline compared with paroxetine and alternative medications in an older adult population: a retrospective cohort study in Southern California.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate risk for falls, fractures and syncope in older adult patients treated with nortriptyline compared with paroxetine and alternative medications. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The electronic medical record and prescription drug database of a large integrated healthcare system in Southern California. PARTICIPANTS: Ambulatory patients, age ≥65 years diagnosed with depression, anxiety disorder or peripheral neuropathy, dispensed one or more of ten study medications between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HR for falls, fractures and syncope with exposure to study medications adjusted for patient demographic variables and comorbidities. RESULTS: Among 195 207 subjects, 19 305 falls, 15 088 fractures and 11 313 episodes of syncope were observed during the study period. Compared with the reference medication, nortriptyline, the adjusted HRs (aHRs) for falls were statistically significantly greater for: paroxetine (aHR 1.48, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.57), amitriptyline (1.20, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.33), venlafaxine (1.44, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.56), duloxetine (1.25, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.40), fluoxetine (1.51, 95% CI 1.44 to 1.59), sertraline (1.53, 95% CI 1.44 to 1.62), citalopram (1.61, 95% CI 1.52 to 1.71) and escitalopram (1.37, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.54), but not gabapentin (0.95, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.02). For fractures, compared with nortriptyline, aHRs were significantly greater for: paroxetine, venlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram and gabapentin, with aHRs ranging from 1.30 for gabapentin to 1.82 for escitalopram; risk was statistically similar for amitriptyline. For syncope, the aHRs were significantly greater for: paroxetine, venlafaxine, fluoxetine, sertraline and citalopram, with aHRs ranging from 1.19 for fluoxetine and paroxetine up to 1.30 for citalopram and sertraline; risk was similar for amitriptyline, duloxetine, escitalopram and gabapentin. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with therapeutic alternatives, nortriptyline was found to represent a lower risk for falls, fractures and syncope, versus comparator medications, except for a few instances that had equivalent risk. The risk for these adverse events from paroxetine was comparable to the alternative medications.

Ginsenoside Rb1 protects hippocampal neurons in depressed rats based on mitophagy-regulated astrocytic pyroptosis.

BACKGROUND: Astrocytes play a vital role in offering functional support for neurons, which are related to the pathogenic mechanism of depression. Ginsenoside Rb1 (GRb1) is demonstrated with antidepressant-like activities. PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate whether GRb1 can inhibit mitophagy-mediated astrocytic pyroptosis to protect neurons in depression. STUDY DESIGN: Model rats were subjected to chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) for determining the in vivo antidepressant activity of GRb1. METHODS: The mitophagy-mediated antipyroptosis role of GRb1 was assessed in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) + ATP-stimulated astrocytes. The mechanism by which GRb1 protects synaptic plasticity was investigated using hippocampal neurons incubated in an astrocyte medium. The rat depressive-like behaviors were determined through sucrose preference, forced swimming, and the open-field tests. Escitalopram was used in the anti-depression control of GRb1. Cyclosporin A (CsA), a mitophagy inhibitor, and interleukin (IL)-1ß were used to reverse the role of GRb1 in mitophagy and pyroptosis, respectively. RESULTS: GRb1 inhibited LPS-induced inflammation and activation in the astrocytes and repressed nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) pathway. Also, GRb1 repressed LPS + ATP-promoted astrocytic pyroptosis. During GRb1 treatment, the activation of mitophagy with a decrease in ROS was observed in LPS + ATPs-stimulated astrocytes. CsA enhanced GRb1-decreased ROS and promoted astrocytic pyroptosis. The GRb1-treated astrocyte medium suppressed neuron death and increased neuron viability and synaptic density. Escitalopram and GRb1 improved the depressive-like behaviors of the rats. GRb1 activated mitophagy and inhibited astrocytic activation and pyroptosis in rats with depression. It also reduced impairments in synaptic structures and increased synaptic density in depressive-like rats. IL-1ß increased astrocytic pyroptosis and reversed GRb1-enhanced synaptic plasticity in the rats exposed to CUMS. There were no statistical changes in depressive-like behaviors between GRb1 and Escitalopram groups. CONCLUSION: GRb1 modulates mitophagy and the NF-κB pathway to inhibit astrocytic pyroptosis, thereby maintaining neurological homeostasis by repressing inflammation and enhancing synaptic plasticity.

Transcutaneous electrical cranial-auricular acupoint stimulation versus escitalopram for modulating the brain activity in mild to moderate major depressive disorder: An fMRI study.

Transcutaneous electrical cranial-auricular acupoint stimulation (TECAS) is an innovative, non-invasive therapy for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, its effectiveness and underlying neural mechanisms remain not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the treatment response and neurological effects of TECAS compared to escitalopram, a commonly used depression medication, using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). Fifty-one patients with mild-to-moderate MDD (34 in the TECAS group and 17 in the Escitalopram group) and 51 healthy controls (HCs) participated in the study. We employed the low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) and regional homogeneity (ReHo) methods to explore brain abnormalities in MDD patients and HCs. Additionally, seed-based functional connectivity (FC) analysis was conducted to examine altered brain networks before and after treatment.Compared to the HCs group, the MDD group exhibited lower ReHo and ALFF values in the right medial superior frontal gyrus (mSFG_R), indicating altered neural activity in this region. Furthermore, mSFG-based FC analysis revealed abnormal FC values in the right inferior occipital gyrus (IOG_R) and middle temporal gyrus (MTG) between after and before treatment in MDD patients. Interestingly, TECAS treatment was found to normalize these abnormal FC brain regions, suggesting its potential role in restoring neural connectivity in MDD patients. Notably, both TECAS and escitalopram demonstrated equivalent antidepressant efficacy, with both treatments showing modulatory effects on connectivity within the default mode network (DMN). The observed normalization of abnormal FC regions, including mSFG_R, IOG_R, and MTG, all belong to the DMN. In conclusion, this study sheds light on the neurological effects and treatment response of TECAS in MDD, highlighting its potential as a non-invasive therapeutic option for depressed patients.

THERAPY OF POST-COVID DEPRESSION: A PROACTIVE PSYCHOSOMATIC APPROACH.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: Evaluation of the effectiveness of the early 8-week monotherapy with escitalopram as a form of proactive psychosomatic intervention for patients with post-COVID depression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: 44 patients with post-COVID depression were involved in a proactive psychosomatic intervention in the form of an 8-week intake of escitalopram (Medogram, Medochemiе Ltd) for 2-8 weeks in the case of a diagnosis of severe depression. Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D), Somatic Symptom Scale (SSS-8), Quality of Life Scale (CQLS) were used to assess symptoms and status dynamics. RESULTS: Results: Patients with post-COVID depression after an 8-week course of escitalopram therapy showed a significant reduction in mental and somatic symptoms of depression and an improvement in quality of life. At the time of enrollment in the study, 12 (28.58%) individuals had mild depression, 15 (35.71%) had moderate depression, and 15 (35.71%) had severe depression. At the end of the 8th weeks of taking the drug in 24 (57.14%) there were no signs of depression on the HAM-D scale, in 18 people there were subclinical manifestations of depression. The effectiveness of escitalopram in reducing the symptoms of depression in this study was 66%. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: With the introduction of pharmacotherapy with escitalopram there was a significant reduction in mental and so¬matic symptoms of depression and an improvement in quality of life. Escitalopram (Medochemie Ltd) may be an effective drug for psychopharmacotherapy of depressive symptoms in patients who have had COVID-19. Further studies are promising its effective¬ness in the treatment of post-COVID depression.

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction vs Escitalopram for the Treatment of Adults With Anxiety Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Anxiety disorders are common, highly distressing, and impairing conditions. Effective treatments exist, but many patients do not access or respond to them. Mindfulness-based interventions, such as mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) are popular and can decrease anxiety, but it is unknown how they compare to standard first-line treatments. Objective: To determine whether MBSR is noninferior to escitalopram, a commonly used first-line psychopharmacological treatment for anxiety disorders. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial (Treatments for Anxiety: Meditation and Escitalopram [TAME]) included a noninferiority design with a prespecified noninferiority margin. Patients were recruited between June 2018 and February 2020. The outcome assessments were performed by blinded clinical interviewer at baseline, week 8 end point, and follow-up visits at 12 and 24 weeks. Of 430 individuals assessed for inclusion, 276 adults with a diagnosed anxiety disorder from 3 urban academic medical centers in the US were recruited for the trial, and 208 completed the trial. Interventions: Participants were 1:1 randomized to 8 weeks of the weekly MBSR course or the antidepressant escitalopram, flexibly dosed from 10 to 20 mg. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was anxiety levels as assessed with the Clinical Global Impression of Severity scale (CGI-S), with a predetermined noninferiority margin of -0.495 points. Results: The primary noninferiority sample consisted of 208 patients (102 in MBSR and 106 in escitalopram), with a mean (SD) age of 33 (13) years; 156 participants (75%) were female; 32 participants (15%) were African American, 41 (20%) were Asian, 18 (9%) were Hispanic/Latino, 122 (59%) were White, and 13 (6%) were of another race or ethnicity (including Native American or Alaska Native, more than one race, or other, consolidated owing to low numbers). Baseline mean (SD) CGI-S score was 4.44 (0.79) for the MBSR group and 4.51 (0.78) for the escitalopram group in the per-protocol sample and 4.49 (0.77) vs 4.54 (0.83), respectively, in the randomized sample. At end point, the mean (SD) CGI-S score was reduced by 1.35 (1.06) for MBSR and 1.43 (1.17) for escitalopram. The difference between groups was -0.07 (0.16; 95% CI, -0.38 to 0.23; P = .65), where the lower bound of the interval fell within the predefined noninferiority margin of -0.495, indicating noninferiority of MBSR compared with escitalopram. Secondary intent-to-treat analyses using imputed data also showed the noninferiority of MBSR compared with escitalopram based on the improvement in CGI-S score. Of patients who started treatment, 10 (8%) dropped out of the escitalopram group and none from the MBSR group due to adverse events. At least 1 study-related adverse event occurred for 110 participants randomized to escitalopram (78.6%) and 21 participants randomized to MBSR (15.4%). Conclusions and Relevance: The results from this randomized clinical trial comparing a standardized evidence-based mindfulness-based intervention with pharmacotherapy for the treatment of anxiety disorders found that MBSR was noninferior to escitalopram. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03522844.

Transcutaneous electrical cranial-auricular acupoint stimulation versus escitalopram for mild-to-moderate depression: An assessor-blinded, randomized, non-inferiority trial.

AIM: Transcutaneous electrical cranial-auricular acupoint stimulation (TECAS) is a novel non-invasive therapy that stimulates acupoints innervated by the trigeminal and auricular vagus nerves. An assessor-blinded, randomized, non-inferiority trial was designed to compare the efficacy of TECAS and escitalopram in mild-to-moderate major depressive disorder. METHODS: 468 participants received two TECAS sessions per day at home (n = 233) or approximately 10-13 mg/day escitalopram (n = 235) for 8 weeks plus 4-week follow-up. The primary outcome was clinical response, defined as a baseline-to-endpoint ≥50% reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score. Secondary outcomes included remission rate, changes in the severity of depression, anxiety, sleep and life quality. RESULTS: The response rate was 66.4% on TECAS and 63.2% on escitalopram with a 3.2% difference (95% confidence interval [CI], -5.9% to 12.9%) in intention-to-treat analysis, and 68.5% versus 66.2% with a 2.3% difference (95% CI, -6.9% to 11.4%) in per-protocol analysis. The lower limit of 95% CI of the differences fell within the prespecified non-inferiority margin of -10% (P ≤ 0.004 for non-inferiority). Most secondary outcomes did not differ between the two groups. TECAS-treated participants who experienced psychological trauma displayed a markedly greater response than those without traumatic experience (81.3% vs 62.1%, P = 0.013). TECAS caused much fewer adverse events than escitalopram. CONCLUSIONS: TECAS was comparable to escitalopram in improving depression and related symptoms, with high acceptability, better safety profile, and particular efficacy in reducing trauma-associated depression. It could serve an effective portable therapy for mild-to-moderate depression.

Escitalopram alters the hypothalamic OX system but does not affect its up-regulation induced by early-life stress in adult rats.

We hypothesized that there is a relationship between the orexinergic system (OX) alterations and changes elicited by escitalopram or venlafaxine in adult rats subjected to maternal separation (MS). This animal model of childhood adversity induces long-lasting consequences in adult physiology and behavior. Male Wistar rats from the control and MS groups were injected with escitalopram or venlafaxine (10 mg/kg) IP from postnatal day (PND) 69-89. Adult rats were subjected to behavioral assessment, estimation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity and analysis of the OX system (quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry) in the hypothalamus and amygdala. MS caused anxiety- and depressive-like behavior, endocrine stress-related response, and up-regulation of the OX system in the hypothalamus. Escitalopram, but not venlafaxine, increased the activity of hypothalamic OX system in the control rats and both drugs had no effect on OXs in the MS group. The disturbed signaling of the OX pathway may be significant for harmful long-term consequences of early-life stress. Our data show that the normal brain and brain altered by MS respond differently to escitalopram. Presumably, anti-anxiety and antidepressant effects of this drug do not depend on the activity of hypothalamic OX system.

An acute dose-ranging evaluation of the antidepressant properties of Sceletium tortuosum (Zembrin®) versus escitalopram in the Flinders Sensitive Line rat.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Sceletium tortuosum (L.) N.E.Br. (ST) has been used by the Khoisan people of South Africa as a mood elevator. Its various pharmacological mechanisms of action suggest distinct potential as an antidepressant. Clinical studies in healthy individuals suggest beneficial effects on mood, cognition, and anxiety. AIM OF THE STUDY: To obtain a chromatographic fingerprint of a standardized extract of S. tortuosum (Zembrin®), and to evaluate the acute antidepressant-like properties of Zembrin® versus the reference antidepressant, escitalopram, in the Flinders Sensitive Line (FSL) rat, a genetic rodent model of depression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The chemical profile of Zembrin® was determined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) chromatogram method using alkaloid standards. Twelve saline treated FSL and six Flinders Resistant Line (FRL) control rats were used to confirm face validity of the FSL model using the forced swim test (FST). Thereafter, FSL rats (n = 10) received either 5, 10, 25, 50 or 100 mg/kg of Zembrin®, or 5, 10 or 20 mg/kg escitalopram oxalate (ESC), both via oral gavage, and subjected to the open field test (OFT) and FST. RESULTS: Four main ST alkaloids were identified and quantified in Zembrin® viz. mesembrenone, mesembrenol, mesembrine, and mesembranol (47.9%, 32%, 13.2%, and 6.8% of the total alkaloids, respectively). FSL rats showed significantly decreased swimming and climbing (coping) behaviours, and significantly increased immobility (despair), versus FRL controls. ESC 5 mg/kg and Zembrin® 25 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg showed significant dose-dependent reversal of immobility in FSL rats and variable effects on coping behaviours. Zembrin® 50 mg/kg was the most effective antidepressant dose, showing equivalence to ESC 5. CONCLUSIONS: Zembrin® (25 and 50 mg/kg) and ESC (5 mg/kg) are effective antidepressants after acute treatment in the FST, as assessed in FSL rats. Moreover, Zembrin® 50 mg/kg proved equivalent to ESC 5. Further long-term bio-behavioural studies on the antidepressant properties of Zembrin® are warranted.

Escitalopram and progressive muscle relaxation training are both effective for the treatment of hot flashes in patients with breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Available treatments for hot flashes in patients with breast cancer are not always tolerable or effective for all patients. METHODS: Patients diagnosed to have primary breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive 10 mg of escitalopram, placebo, or progressive muscle relaxation therapy. Patients were asked to report the frequency and duration of hot flashes during day and night, at baseline and after ten weeks of treatment, and completed the menopause rating scale. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive escitalopram (n = 26), PMRT (n = 28), and placebo (n = 28). PMRT and escitalopram could effectively decrease number and duration of diurnal and nocturnal HFs in patients with breast cancer, with a better effect observed from escitalopram. They could both decrease the total score of MRS. CONCLUSION: Both escitalopram ad PMRT can reveal nocturnal and diurnal HFs in terms of frequency and duration in patients with breast cancer.

Evaluating the efficacy and moderators of algorithm-guided antidepressant treatments of major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: In spite of numerous options, the most efficacious treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) remains elusive. Algorithm-guided treatments (AGTs) are proposed to address inadequate remission and optimize treatment delivery. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of AGTs for MDD, and to explore specific moderators of treatment outcomes for individual patients. METHODS: The study recruited 987 patients with MDD across eight hospitals who were randomly assigned to AGT with escitalopram (AGT-E), AGT with mirtazapine (AGT-M), or treatment-as-usual (TAU). The outcomes were symptom remission, response rate, early improvement rate, subsymptom clusters improvement over time, the mean time to first remission, relapse rate at 6-months posttreatment follow-up, quality of life (QOL), and adverse events. RESUTLS: No significant differences were observed across groups in outcome, except that TAU showed significantly poorer QOL, higher relapse rates at 6-months posttreatment follow-up, and marginally significantly worse maximal burden of adverse events than the AGT groups. After 6 weeks of treatment initiation, remission rate did not significantly increase with extended treatment. AGT-M outperformed the TAU and AGT-E in treating sleep symptoms. AGT-E was less effective than AGT-M and TAU in patients with severe depression and somatic symptoms (DSSS). The superiority of TAU over AGTs was observed in recurrent MDD patients. CONCLUSION: Although the superiority of AGTs over TAU was limited by failure of alternative subsequent treatment, AGTs outperformed in QOL and relapse rate. Types of disease episode and DSSS were regarded as specific moderators in treatment of depression. These findings might contribute to future research on targeted antidepressant treatment.

[Curative effect of the combined therapy of warm acupuncture at back-shu points of five zang organs and western medicine on depression of yang deficiency pattern and its attenuating effect].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the therapeutic results and the occurrence of adverse reactions of medicine between the combined therapy of warm acupuncture at back-shu points of five zang organs and the western medicine and the simple wes-tern medication, and observe the therapeutic effect and attenuating effect of this combined therapy in treatment on depression of yang deficiency pattern. METHODS: A total of 80 patients with depression of yang deficiency pattern were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group （39 cases/group）. In the control group, escitalopram oxalate tablets were administered orally every day. In the observation group, on the base of the medication as the control group, warm acupuncture therapy was exerted at back-shu points of five zang organs, for 30 min each time, 5 times a week. The duration of treatment was 6 weeks in two groups. Before and after treatment, the scores of Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) and the antidepressant side effect scale (SERS) were evaluated and electroencephalogram (EEG) was detected; and the curative effect was assessed according to HAMD reduction rate in patients of the two groups. RESULTS: After treatment, the HAMD and SERS scores were lower than those before treatment in both groups. Compared with the control group, the HAMD and SERS scores were lower (P<0.05, P<0.01), and the EEG result was improved (P<0.01) in the observation group. The clinical total effective rate of the observation group was 97.43% (38/39), higher than 92.30% (36/39) of the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The combined therapy of warm acupuncture at back-shu points of five zang organs and western medicine effectively relieves depression of yang deficiency pattern in the patients and its overall therapeutic effect is better than simple western medication, besides, the combined therapy alleviates the adverse reactions induced by simple western medication.

Determination of anxiolytic and antidepressant like activity of hydro alcoholic fruit extract of Pyrus communis (L.) and its impact on the memory after chronic dosing in animal models.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anxiolytic and antidepressant activity of ethanolic fruit extract of Pyrus communis (pear), in comparison with escitalopram in rodents (rats and mice). Thirty Wistar rats of about 200-250gm and albino mice of 25-30gm, male gender were divided into three groups each comprising of (n=10) animal respectively. Control group received distilled water, positive control received 10mg escitalopram & treated group received 200mg/kg/day of Pyrus communis ethanolic fruit extract orally for 30 days. They were evaluated by using the open field test, forced swim test (FST), plus maze test, light and dark test, hole poking test, stationary rod test, water maze test & cage crossing activity. Results were expressed as mean ± SD. Data was analyzed by using SPSS software (VERSION 21) one way ANOVA followed by Tukey test was used for post hoc analysis. Our result showed that fruit extract had significant antidepressant-like behavior in FST (p<0.001), open field (p<0.05), cage crossing (p<0.001) , significant anxiolytic activity in light and dark box test, plus-maze activity and significantly enhanced learning in water maze and stationary rod test when compared with control. The Pyrus communis fruit extract showed the anxiolytic and antidepressant-like profile in rats and mice. However, further studies need to be carried out in clinical trials for its use in different neuropsychological disorders.

A single dose of escitalopram blunts the neural response in the thalamus and caudate during monetary loss.

Background: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) show acute effects on the neural processes associated with negative affective bias in healthy people and people with depression. However, whether and how SSRIs also affect reward and punishment processing on a similarly rapid time scale remains unclear. Methods: We investigated the effects of an acute and clinically relevant dose (20 mg) of the SSRI escitalopram on brain response during reward and punishment processing in 19 healthy participants. In a doubleblind, placebo-controlled study using functional MRI, participants performed a well-established monetary reward task at 3 time points: at baseline; after receiving placebo or escitalopram; and after receiving placebo or escitalopram following an 8-week washout period. Results: Acute escitalopram administration reduced blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response during punishment feedback in the right thalamus (family-wise error corrected [FWE] p = 0.013 at peak level) and the right caudate head (pFWE = 0.011 at peak level) compared to placebo. We did not detect any significant BOLD changes during reward feedback. Limitations: We included only healthy participants, so interpretation of findings are limited to the healthy human brain and require future testing in patient populations. The paradigm we used was based on monetary stimuli, and results may not be generalizable to other forms of reward. Conclusion: Our findings extend theories of rapid SSRI action on the neural processing of rewarding and aversive stimuli and suggest a specific and acute effect of escitalopram in the punishment neurocircuitry.