RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Large volume delayed sampling (LVDS) and pathogen reduction technology (PRT) are strategies for platelet processing to minimize transfusion of contaminated platelet components (PCs). This study holistically compares the economic and clinical impact of LVDS and PRT in the United States. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A decision model was constructed to simulate collection, processing, and use of PCs and to compare processing strategies: PRT with 5-day shelf life, LVDS with 7-day shelf life (LVDS7), and LVDS with 5-day shelf life extended to 7 days with secondary testing (LVDS5/2). Target population was adults requiring two or more transfusions. Collection, processing, storage, and distribution data were obtained from the National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey and published literature. Patient outcomes associated with transfusions were obtained from AABB guidelines, meta-analyses, and other published clinical studies. Costs were obtained from reimbursement schedules and other published sources. RESULTS: Given 10,000 donated units, 9512, 9511, and 9651 units of PRT, LVDS5/2, and LVDS7 PCs were available for transfusion, respectively. With these units, 1502, 2172, and 2329 transfusions can be performed with similar levels of adverse events. Assuming 30 transfusions a day, a hospital would require 69,325, 47,940, and 45,383 units of PRT, LVDS5/2, and LVDS7 platelets to perform these transfusions. The mean costs to perform transfusions were significantly higher with PRT units. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PRT, LVDS strategies were associated with lower costs and higher PC availability while patients experienced similar levels of adverse events. Increased utilization of LVDS has the potential to improve efficiency, expand patient access to platelets, and reduce health care costs.
Asunto(s)
Plaquetas , Seguridad de la Sangre/métodos , Plaquetas/microbiología , Plaquetas/parasitología , Plaquetas/virología , Seguridad de la Sangre/economía , Humanos , Recuento de Plaquetas , Transfusión de Plaquetas/economía , Transfusión de Plaquetas/métodos , Esterilización/economía , Esterilización/métodos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and coverage benefits of auto-disable (AD) syringes, weighed against the financial and logis- tical costs, and to create appropriate health policies in Madagascar. METHODS: Fifteen clinics in Madagascar, trained to use AD syringes, were randomized to implement an AD syringe only, mixed (AD syringes used only on non-routine immunization days), or sterilizable syringe only (control) programme. During a five-week period, data on administered vaccinations were collected, interviews were conducted, and observations were recorded. FINDINGS: The use of AD syringes improved coverage rates by significantly increasing the percentage of vaccines administered on non-routine immunization days (AD-only 4.3%, mixed 5.7%, control 1.1% (P<0.05)). AD-only clinics eliminated sterilization sessions for vaccinations, whereas mixed clinics reduced the number of sterilization sessions by 64%. AD syringes were five times more expensive than sterilizable syringes, which increased AD-only and mixed clinics' projected annual injection costs by 365% and 22%, respectively. However, introducing AD syringes for all vaccinations would only increase the national immunization budget by 2%. CONCLUSION: The use of AD syringes improved vaccination coverage rates by providing ready-to-use sterile syringes on non-routine immunization days and decreasing the number of sterilization sessions, thereby improving injection safety. The mixed programme was the most beneficial approach to phasing in AD syringes and diminishing logistical complications, and it had minimal costs. AD syringes, although more expensive, can feasibly be introduced into a developing country's immunization programme to improve vaccination safety and coverage.
Asunto(s)
Equipos Desechables/provisión & distribución , Programas de Inmunización/organización & administración , Inmunización/instrumentación , Jeringas/provisión & distribución , Preescolar , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunización/economía , Programas de Inmunización/economía , Programas de Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Lactante , Madagascar/epidemiología , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Esterilización/economía , Toxoide Tetánico/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
The increasing limitation of resources has stimulated the discussion of the reuse of medical devices labelled for "single use" by the manufacturer. The prerequisites for employment of reprocessing measures are patient safety and cost saving potential. Although reprocessing of single use medical devices has been general practice by many institutions, health care providers and authorities have remained insecure as to hygienic and functional risks, liability and legal aspects. Changes in legislation (German Medical Device Act), guidelines of the Robert Koch Institute (and position of the FDA) and the high quality guaranteed by innovative reprocessing technology have now created the basis for expanded but controlled use of reprocessing techniques for medical devices as a contribution to cost containment. A significant cost saving potential is calculated for the cost-intensive field of interventional cardiology.