Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
2.
Anaesthesia ; 70(1): 93-103, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25348076

RESUMEN

In 153 AD, the Roman physician Scribonius Largus identified that electric current had analgesic properties, instructing patients to stand on an electric ray for the treatment of gout. In 2014, transcranial magnetic stimulation was approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for the treatment of migraine. Although separated by nearly two millennia, these milestones represent the evolution of the utilisation of electric current in medical and anaesthetic practice. Significant advances have been made over the last century in particular, and during the 1960s and 1970s, tens of thousands of patients were reportedly anaesthetised for surgical interventions using electric current as the anaesthetic agent. Many medical interventions, including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and deep brain stimulation, have evolved in the aftermath of investigations into electroanaesthesia; the potential for electric current to be an anaesthetic agent of the future still exists.


Asunto(s)
Electronarcosis/historia , Torpedo/fisiología , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/historia , Animales , Terapia Electroconvulsiva/historia , Electronarcosis/tendencias , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia Antigua , Humanos
3.
Clin Nephrol ; 79 Suppl 1: S12-23, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23249528

RESUMEN

Application of electricity for pain treatment dates back to thousands of years BC. The Ancient Egyptians and later the Greeks and Romans recognized that electrical fishes are capable of generating electric shocks for relief of pain. In the 18th and 19th centuries these natural producers of electricity were replaced by man-made electrical devices. This happened in following phases. The first was the application of static electrical currents (called Franklinism), which was produced by a friction generator. Christian Kratzenstein was the first to apply it medically, followed shortly by Benjamin Franklin. The second phase was Galvanism. This method applied a direct electrical current to the skin by chemical means, applied a direct and pulsed electrical current to the skin. In the third phase the electrical current was induced intermittently and in alternate directions (called Faradism). The fourth stage was the use of high frequency currents (called d'Arsonvalisation). The 19th century was the "golden age" of electrotherapy. It was used for countless dental, neurological, psychiatric and gynecological disturbances. However, at beginning of the 20th century electrotherapy fell from grace. It was dismissed as lacking a scientific basis and being used also by quacks and charlatans for unserious aims. Furthermore, the development of effective analgesic drugs decreased the interest in electricity. In the second half of the 20th century electrotherapy underwent a revival. Based on animal experiments and clinical investigations, its neurophysiological mechanisms were elucidated in more details. The pain relieving action of electricity was explained in particular by two main mechanisms: first, segmental inhibition of pain signals to the brain in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and second, activation of the descending inhibitory pathway with enhanced release of endogenous opioids and other neurochemical compounds (serotonin, noradrenaline, gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA), acetylcholine and adenosine). The modern electrotherapy of neuromusculo- skeletal pain is based in particular on the following types: transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS or electro-acupuncture) and spinal cord stimulation (SCS). In mild to moderate pain, TENS and PENS are effective methods, whereas SCS is very useful for therapy of refractory neuropathic or ischemic pain. In 2005, high tone external muscle stimulation (HTEMS) was introduced. In diabetic peripheral neuropathy, its analgesic action was more pronounced than TENS application. HTEMS appeared also to have value in the therapy of symptomatic peripheral neuropathy in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Besides its pain-relieving effect, electrical stimulation is of major importance for prevention or treatment of muscle dysfunction and sarcopenia. In controlled clinical studies electrical myostimulation (EMS) has been shown to be effective against the sarcopenia of patients with chronic congestive heart disease, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and ESRD.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/historia , Debilidad Muscular/historia , Manejo del Dolor/historia , Torpedo , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/historia , Animales , Historia del Siglo XVIII , Historia del Siglo XIX , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Historia Antigua , Humanos , Debilidad Muscular/terapia
4.
Prog Neurol Surg ; 24: 1-15, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21422772

RESUMEN

Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an established neuromodulation approach that has been successfully used for the treatment of various painful conditions since the early 1960s. This review provides a comprehensive summary of relevant publications on PNS dividing its history into three distinct periods. The milestones of the field are related to the development of procedures, equipment and indications. As the most rapidly growing segment of operative neuromodulation, PNS continues to evolve as current and emerging clinical indications become matched by basic and clinical research, technological developments and procedural refinements.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/historia , Nervios Periféricos/fisiología , Animales , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Historia del Siglo XIX , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Dolor/fisiopatología , Manejo del Dolor , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/historia , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/métodos
5.
Int Urogynecol J ; 21 Suppl 2: S431-8, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20972549

RESUMEN

In the decade of the 1970's, the NIH was captivated by the dream of harnessing electrical stimulation for widespread therapeutic goals. After the success of pacemakers in the 1960's hopes were high that a number of compromised body functions could be helped. These included hearing loss, seizure disorders, scoliosis, pain control, and in spinal cord injury patients: the restoration of lost limb function, walking and breathing, and bladder control. It was a comprehensive program involving numerous research centers and included a wide variety of talent, from chemical and electrical engineers to PhDs and MDs from a variety of disciplines. The University of California in San Francisco was invited to be part of the program, largely because of its leadership status in the field of urodynamics at the time. Research was carried out throughout the decade in the successful attempt to make neural stimulation an everyday therapy for compromised bladder function. The program was carried out in phases. Initial efforts were directed at direct stimulation of the bladder wall, then the spinal cord directly, and finally the sacral roots. The goal was to achieve synergic voiding. While that didn't happen, intermittent voiding was achieved and a whole new meaning to the term modulation therapy opened up. The following paper discusses the research path into the development of sacral nerve stimulation from the lab through clinical trials to FDA approval. Critical observations linking the human situation to the lab experimental observations are underscored. The pitfalls in transition from the university environment to commercial application are depicted, along with all the human roadblocks that arose. It was a 25-year program that influenced the careers of many "fellows" worldwide. It culminated in successful patient therapy because of the generous collaborative efforts of many academic centers in Europe and North America. It was an era where all the necessary elements were in place-the NIH leadership, the combination of research talent and lab animal availability, adequate funding, and a high level of subject interest. The research environment prior to and after this time period was not nearly as friendly, either politically nor fiscally, to this sort of research program. Had it not been for this mix of forces the therapy may never have evolved.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/historia , Raíces Nerviosas Espinales , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Neuroestimuladores Implantables/historia , Sacro , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/historia , Vejiga Urinaria/inervación , Vejiga Urinaria/fisiopatología , Trastornos Urinarios/historia , Trastornos Urinarios/terapia
11.
Rev. mex. anestesiol ; 9(4): 233-8, oct.-dic. 1986. tab, ilus
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: lil-65765

RESUMEN

El presente artículo revisa históricamente el uso por diferentes autores de la electricidad con objeto de tratar o aliviar el dolor de muy variados tipos. Menciona el diseño de aparatos que permiten la aplicación de corriente eléctrica en tiempo e intensidad deseados. También refiere la asociación de analgésicos y electricidad con objeto de proporcionar analgesia útil en cirugía


Asunto(s)
Historia Antigua , Historia del Siglo XVII , Historia del Siglo XVIII , Historia del Siglo XIX , Historia del Siglo XX , Dolor/terapia , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/historia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA