Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 218(5): 280-9, 2001 May.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11417318

RESUMEN

According to Goldmann stereopsis is the highest performance of binocular recognition. A historical review shows that binocular stereopsis was explained only in 1838 by Wheatstone, whereas the monocular clues for stereopsis e.g. size, position and covering of the objects, light and shadow, perspective of the air, parallax and linear perspective were known long ago. The denomination depth perception is ambiguous: "depth" is the opposite of "height". Stereopsis means natural recognition of distance and objects in space, stereoscopy means recognition by the aide of an instrument. Natural and dichoptic stereopsis and the influences of vertical structures, of pupillary distance and of astigmatism are discussed. Examination of stereopsis is discussed, among others the two pencil test, the stereo-modification Bagolini-glasses, the combination of the plano-cylinders of W. R. Hess with random dots without glasses, the disk stereopsis etc. Goldmann's theory of binocular vision helps to understand different forms of strabismus, e.g. the statistical interplay of fixation and fusion for microtropia, the fixation mechanism for the congenital strabismus syndrome, the use of binocular stereopsis only for near explains intermittent divergence.


Asunto(s)
Percepción de Profundidad/fisiología , Ilusiones Ópticas/fisiología , Orientación/fisiología , Estrabismo/historia , Alemania , Historia del Siglo XVI , Historia del Siglo XVII , Historia del Siglo XVIII , Historia del Siglo XIX , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia Antigua , Historia Medieval , Humanos , Estrabismo/fisiopatología
5.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 173(4): 449-57, 1978 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-366256

RESUMEN

After an introduction on the value of history also from modern medicine, the teaching of strabismus from the earliest begin at the time of Hammurapis (1700 BC) up to our times is broadly described. The old greek and latin ideas are analysed linguistically. The work of Johannes Müller and Emil Javel is especially emphasized with regard to advances in the teaching of squint and its treatment. Landolt, Maddox, Sattler and Bielschowsky above all have usefully completed these aspects. The knowledges over squint which were forgotten in many places in the first third of our century were rediscovered and considerably extended, at first by Worth, and later especially by Lyle, Bangerter, Hugonnier, Cüppers, and last but not least Heinrich Harms.


Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/historia , Oftalmología/educación , Estrabismo/historia , Europa (Continente) , Historia del Siglo XV , Historia del Siglo XVIII , Historia del Siglo XIX , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia Antigua , Historia Medieval , Humanos , Oftalmología/historia , Enseñanza
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA