Outcomes of Ventral Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty in Bulbomembranous Urethral Strictures Post-transurethral Resection of the Prostate.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of ventral onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (VOBMGU) in bulbomembranous urethral strictures after transurethral resection of the prostate. METHODS: After approval of the institutional ethical committee, we retrospectively examined the database of patients diagnosed with post-TURP urethral stricture (PTS) and treated by VOBMGU from January 2020 to January 2022. The patients were evaluated by retrograde urethrogram and voiding cystourethrogram. Follow-up evaluation included assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms, physical examination, uroflowmetry (Q-max and International Prostate Symptom Score) 3, 6, and 12months of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients underwent VOBMGU for bulbomembranous PTS were included. The median age of the patients was 63.5 (11.25). The median stricture length was 3.5 (1.5) cm. During follow-up, the mean Q-max significantly increased to 21.1 ± 5.5 mL/s (P < .0001), 20.1 ± 5.4 mL/s (P < .001), and 19.1 ± 5.3 mL/s (P < .003) at 3, 6, and 12months, respectively. IPSS significantly decreased to 8.93 ± 6.37 at the 12-month follow-up mark (P < .0001). Three patients developed stricture recurrence and two patients developed postoperative urinary incontinence. CONCLUSION: VOBMGU in cases of bulbomembranous urethral PTS offered excellent functional outcomes with low stricture recurrence and minimal risk of incontinence. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm the results.

Perioperative and functional outcomes of salvage versus primary Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: Evidence-based on controlled studies.

To evaluate the perioperative and functional outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) among patients with and without prior transurethral prostate surgery. we performed a systematic search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus databases for articles evaluating the effectiveness of salvage HoLEP (S-HoLEP) versus primary HoLEP (P-HoLEP) until January 2023. Nine studies involving 6044 patients were included for both quantitative and qualitative analysis. Compared with P-HoLEP, S-HoLEP used more energy (weighted mean difference = 14.27 KJ; 95% CI = 4.75-23.79; P = 0.003) and had an increased incidence of postoperative clot retention (odds ratio = 2.12; 95% CI = 1.25-3.59; P = 0.005) and urethral stricture (OR = 1.99; 95% CI = 1.04-3.8; P = 0.04). However, the International Prostate Symptom Score at the sixth month of follow-up was significantly lower for S-HoLEP than for P-HoLEP (WMD = -0.80; 95% CI = -1.38 to -0.22; P = 0.007). There was no significant difference between S-HoLEP and P-HoLEP in terms of operative time, enucleation time, enucleation efficiency, morcellation time, resected weight, catheterisation time, hospital stay duration, quality of life, maximum urinary flow rate, postvoid residual and intraoperative and postoperative overall complications. compared with P-HoLEP, S-HoLEP is still a feasible and effective method for treating residual benign prostatic hyperplasia, with only a slight increase in the probability of energy utilisation, clot retention and urethral stricture. Despite these minor discrepancies, the overall beneficial effects of the two modalities on symptom resolution is noteworthy.

Risk factors for bladder neck contracture after transurethral resection of the prostate.

INTRODUCTION: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the most frequently used treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia with a prostate volume of <80 mL. A long-term complication is bladder neck contracture (BNC). The aim of the present study was to identify the risk factors for BNC formation after TURP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all TURP primary procedures which were performed at one academic institution between 2013 and 2018. All patients were analyzed and compared with regard to postoperative formation of a BNC requiring further therapy. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVAs) were performed to identify possible risk factors for BNC development. RESULTS: We included 1368 patients in this analysis. Out of these, 88 patients (6.4%) developed BNC requiring further surgical therapy. The following factors showed a statistically significant association with BNC development: smaller preoperative prostate volume (p = 0.001), lower resected prostate weight (p = 0.004), lower preoperative levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA, p < 0.001), shorter duration of the surgery (p = 0.027), secondary transurethral intervention (due to urinary retention or gross hematuria) during inpatient stay (p = 0.018), positive (≥100 CFU/mL) preoperative urine culture (p = 0.010), and urethral stricture (US) formation requiring direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) postoperatively after TURP (p < 0.001), in particular membranous (p = 0.046) and bulbar (p < 0.001) strictures. Preoperative antibiotic treatment showed a protective effect (p = 0.042). Histopathological findings of prostate cancer (PCA) in the resected prostate tissue were more frequent among patients who did not develop BNC (p = 0.049). On MVA, smaller preoperative prostate volume (p = 0.046), positive preoperative urine culture (p = 0.021), and US requiring DVIU after TURP (p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors for BNC development. CONCLUSION: BNC is a relevant long-term complication after TURP. In particular, patients with a smaller prostate should be thoroughly informed about this complication.

Transperineal bulbovesical anastomosis for extensive posterior urethral stenoses after treatment of prostatic disease.

OBJECTIVES: We report our surgical experience of transperineal bulbovesical anastomosis (BVA) for extensive posterior urethral stenosis (PUS). METHODS: Six male patients who had extensive PUS extending from the bulbomembranous urethra to the bladder neck due to prostatic disease treatment and underwent transperineal BVA between 2014 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. BVA was performed according to the elaborate perineal approach for pelvic fracture urethral repair with minor modifications. After confirming the absence of recurrent stenosis 6 months postoperatively, the patients were offered artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement for subsequent urinary incontinence (UI). RESULTS: Median patient age was 68, and the etiology of PUS was radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in four patients, brachytherapy for prostate cancer in one, and transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia in one. All patients had been previously treated with multiple transurethral procedures such as urethrotomy and dilation. Median operative time and blood loss were 211 min and 154 ml, respectively. Five cases (83.3%) had no recurrent stenosis with a median follow-up of 45 months, but a single direct vision internal urethrotomy was performed in one (16.7%) due to restenosis. Four (66.7%) patients underwent AUS placement via transcorporal approach for subsequent UI, but two had it removed due to urethral erosion. CONCLUSION: Transperineal BVA could effectively manage extensive PUS after prostatic disease treatment. Staged AUS placement could be a viable option for subsequent UI, but the risk of urethral erosion seemed high.

Efficacy of urethral reconstruction for urethral stricture associated with hypospadias surgery in adults.

OBJECTIVES: We report our experience with urethral reconstruction for hypospadias surgery-related urethral stricture in terms of surgical and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Twenty-nine adult males who underwent urethral reconstruction for hypospadias surgery-related urethral stricture between August 2008 and January 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Uroflowmetry and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. Surgical success was defined as the absence of additional procedures. Patients were asked to rate their satisfaction with urethral reconstruction as "very satisfied", "satisfied", "unsatisfied", or "very unsatisfied". RESULTS: The median patient age at referral was 43 years. The median number of previously performed hypospadias surgeries was three, and 18 patients (62.8%) had been treated with repeated transurethral procedures. The median stricture length was 54 mm (interquartile range 36-81). Performed urethral reconstruction included staged urethroplasty in 22 (75.9%), one-stage onlay augmentation in 3 (10.2%), and perineal urethrostomy in 4 (13.8%) cases. Urethral reconstruction was successful in 26 patients (89.7%) over a median postoperative period of 31 months. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed in 25 (86.2%) patients. The mean maximum flow rate, international prostate symptom score total score, international prostate symptom score quality of life score, and EuroQol-5 dimensions index significantly improved postoperatively. Twenty-three patients (92%) were "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with the outcome of their urethral reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Urethral reconstruction is a highly successful and patient-satisfying treatment for hypospadias surgery-related urethral stricture in adult patients. Perineal urethrostomy is a reasonable alternative for elderly patients and for patients with complicated hypospadias surgery-related urethral strictures.

Clinical practice guideline for transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia (2021 Edition).

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is highly prevalent among older men, impacting on their quality of life, sexual function, and genitourinary health, and has become an important global burden of disease. Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate (TUPKP) is one of the foremost surgical procedures for the treatment of BPH. It has become well established in clinical practice with good efficacy and safety. In 2018, we issued the guideline "2018 Standard Edition". However much new direct evidence has now emerged and this may change some of previous recommendations. The time is ripe to develop new evidence-based guidelines, so we formed a working group of clinical experts and methodologists. The steering group members posed 31 questions relevant to the management of TUPKP for BPH covering the following areas: questions relevant to the perioperative period (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) of TUPKP in the treatment of BPH, postoperative complications and the level of surgeons' surgical skill. We searched the literature for direct evidence on the management of TUPKP for BPH, and assessed its certainty generated recommendations using the grade criteria by the European Association of Urology. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of an ungraded consensus-based statement. Finally, we issued 36 statements. Among them, 23 carried strong recommendations, and 13 carried weak recommendations for the stated procedure. They covered questions relevant to the aforementioned three areas. The preoperative period for TUPKP in the treatment of BPH included indications and contraindications for TUPKP, precautions for preoperative preparation in patients with renal impairment and urinary tract infection due to urinary retention, and preoperative prophylactic use of antibiotics. Questions relevant to the intraoperative period incorporated surgical operation techniques and prevention and management of bladder explosion. The application to different populations incorporating the efficacy and safety of TUPKP in the treatment of normal volume (< 80 ml) and large-volume (≥ 80 ml) BPH compared with transurethral urethral resection prostate, transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate and open prostatectomy; the efficacy and safety of TUPKP in high-risk populations and among people taking anticoagulant (antithrombotic) drugs. Questions relevant to the postoperative period incorporated the time and speed of flushing, the time indwelling catheters are needed, principles of postoperative therapeutic use of antibiotics, follow-up time and follow-up content. Questions related to complications incorporated types of complications and their incidence, postoperative leukocyturia, the treatment measures for the perforation and extravasation of the capsule, transurethral resection syndrome, postoperative bleeding, urinary catheter blockage, bladder spasm, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence, urethral stricture, rectal injury during surgery, postoperative erectile dysfunction and retrograde ejaculation. Final questions were related to surgeons' skills when performing TUPKP for the treatment of BPH. We hope these recommendations can help support healthcare workers caring for patients having TUPKP for the treatment of BPH.

Surgical Complications in the Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There are a variety of treatment options for men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard surgical treatment. The field continues to evolve with the introduction of new energy and laser technologies, increasing adoption of enucleation techniques, in addition to the advent of minimally invasive surgical technologies (MIST) that enable office-based treatments. The choice in surgical management has become very nuanced depending on a variety of patient and anatomic factors. There continues to be high success rates for surgical treatment of BPH; however, the risk profiles vary across the various surgical treatments. We sought to evaluate contemporary series and summarize the experience of complications associated with BPH treatment and management of these complications. RECENT FINDINGS: A comprehensive literature review was performed, and identified 79 manuscripts, published between 2005 and 2021 characterizing the diagnosis and management of complications following BPH surgery. Commonly cited issues included bleeding, ureteral orifice injury, bladder neck injury, rectal injury, TURP syndrome, bladder neck contractures, urethral stricture disease, refractory OAB symptoms, and complications unique to new modalities of treatment. The practicing urologist has multiple surgical options to choose from in treating patients with symptomatic BPH. The surgical management of BPH is generally well tolerated with high objective success rates that allow for significant improvement in urinary quality of life. It is critical to understand the potential complications associated with these various treatment options, which will enable trainees and practicing urologists to better counsel patients and manage these potential complications.

Factors predicting the development of urethral stricture after bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the rate of urethral stricture development, predictor factors, and the reliability following bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate. METHODS: A total of 124 patients participated in this study. Patient data were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into group 1 (those who developed urethral stricture) and group 2 (those who did not develop urethral stricture). Annual checkups were performed after the postoperative months 1 and 6. The patients were checked by uroflowmetry + post-voiding residue and international index of erectile function. We evaluated the complications that developed during the perioperative period according to the Clavien system. RESULTS: Urethral stricture developed in 10.5% (13/124) of the patients. It was found that patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate for the second time (p=0.007), patients with a preoperative catheter or history of catheter insertion (p=0.009), patients with high preoperative median white blood cell (103) counts (p=0.013), and patients with long postoperative catheterization time had a higher rate of urethral stricture after bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (p=0.046). No grade 4 and grade 5 complications were observed according to the Clavien system in patients. CONCLUSION: Factors such as second transurethral resection of the prostate surgery, history of preoperative catheter insertion, high postoperative white blood cell count, and long postoperative catheterization time increase the risk of urethral stricture after bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate.

Urethral stricture following endoscopic prostate surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective, randomized trials.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aims to evaluate the incidence and influencing factors of urethral stricture (US) in relation to different BPH endoscopic techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Controlled Register of Trials. The incidence of US was estimated through comparative studies between different endoscopic techniques. Patients were assigned into groups according to the type of surgery (enucleation, ablation and resection group). Incidences of US were pooled using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method with the random effect model and reported as Risk Ratio (RR), 95% Confidence Intervals (CI), and p-values. RESULTS: A total of 80 studies were included for meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of US was 1.7% after enucleation, 2.1% after ablation, 3.8% after monopolar (M)-TURP and 2.1% after bipolar (B)-TURP. The incidence of US was significantly lower after Enucleation than after TURP (RR 0.58 95% CI 0.39-0.84, p = 0.004). US incidence was lower for Ablation procedures than TURP, but the difference did not reach significance (RR 0.79 95% CI 0.61-1.3, p = 0.08). However, this was significant in the subgroup of M-TURP studies (RR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.49-0.91, p = 0.01). Sub-analysis showed that the risk of US was significantly lower after Enucleation than after TURP within 12 months after surgery (RR 0.51 95% CI 0.33-0.81, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The study shows an increased incidence of US after TURP compared to enucleation and ablation procedures. The main factors related to increased US incidence are the use of monopolar energy, instrument caliber and duration of postoperative catheterization.

The role of prostate inflammation in the pathogenesis of urethral strictures occurring after transurethral resections.

OBJECTIVE: To make an extensive evaluation about the effects of histopathological findings acquired from the resection materials of patients who underwent transurethral resection of prostate (TUR-P) due to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) on postoperative urethral stricture formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among patients who had TUR-P due to BPH and were followed up for minimum 6 months, 51 patients detected to have urethral stricture based on endoscopic imaging were included in the urethral stricture group (Group 1) and 52 patients without urethral stricture were included in the control group (Group 2). The relation between histopathological findings of TURP materials and postoperative stricture occurrence was investigated. RESULTS: No difference in age, prostate volume, operation time and postoperative catheterization time was detected among the groups (p=0.86, p=0.13, p=0.06, p=0.32, respectively). Average time until the urethral stricture diagnosis in the group with urethral stricture was measured as 57.9±27.2 days. In our study, inflammation intensity in peri-urethral, stromal and periglandular areas and intraglandular destruction ratios were higher in urethral stricture group (Group 1) (p=0.048, p=0.3, p=0.03, p=0.01, respectively). Again, it was detected that neutrophil, plasmocyte and eosinophil cell ratios were higher in peri-urethral, stromal and periglandular areas and lymphocyte values were lower compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: Acquired data has shown that acute inflammatory attacks may be related to urethral stricture with a mostly chronic inflammation background in the prostate. During histopathological examination of prostate tissue acquired through TURP, especially high peri-urethral neutrophil, plasmocyte and eosinophil cell ratios and intra-glandular destruction ratios are important for predicting postoperative urethral stricture occurrences.

The Feasibility of Open Prostatectomy in Patients with History of Previous Prostate Surgery.

PURPOSE: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most common problems in elderly men. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) can be performed for most patients who need re-do prostate surgery, but open prostatectomy should be considered in patients with prostate size larger than 70 grams. This study assessed the feasibility of open prostatectomy (OP) after previous TURP in patients whose prostate size was larger than 70 grams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We subdivided patients into two groups: group 1 included patients who had a history of prostate surgery presented with severe voiding symptoms and a large prostate (>70 gram). Patients who were candidate for open simple prostatectomy without a history of prostate surgery were allocated to group 2. RESULTS: Between June 2007 and April 2018, 2700 patients underwent TURP or open prostatectomy in our department. 152 of 2700 patients came to us because of severe voiding symptoms after previous prostate surgery, but only 30 patients met the criteria to be enrolled in this study. Perioperative complication (capsular perforation) occurred in 4 (13.3%) patients in group 1 whereas none of the patients in the group 2 had capsular perforation. Hemoglobin drop in group 1 was not significantly different from patients in group 2. The rate of blood transfusion did not differ between the groups (2 [6.6%] patients in group 1 and 41 (5.6%) patients in group 2). After 6-12 months, re-operation rate because of urethral/bladder neck stricture was done in 10 (30%) patients in group 1 and 15 (2%) patients in group 2 (p < 0.05). Four (13.3%) patients in group 1 complained of urinary leakage (more than one pad per day) 6 months after the operation whereas 5 patients in group 2 used more than one pad per day (0.7%) (p > 0.05). Hospital stay was slightly longer in patients in group 1. Six months after the operation, the patients' quality of life was better in group 2 compared with group 1 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Open simple prostatectomy was a feasible procedure in patients with large prostate after previous TURP, but it was associated with more complications in the long term.

Factors predicting the development of urethral stricture after bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the rate of urethral stricture development, predictor factors, and the reliability following bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate. METHODS: A total of 124 patients participated in this study. Patient data were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into group 1 (those who developed urethral stricture) and group 2 (those who did not develop urethral stricture). Annual checkups were performed after the postoperative months 1 and 6. The patients were checked by uroflowmetry + post-voiding residue and international index of erectile function. We evaluated the complications that developed during the perioperative period according to the Clavien system. RESULTS: Urethral stricture developed in 10.5% (13/124) of the patients. It was found that patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate for the second time (p=0.007), patients with a preoperative catheter or history of catheter insertion (p=0.009), patients with high preoperative median white blood cell (103) counts (p=0.013), and patients with long postoperative catheterization time had a higher rate of urethral stricture after bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (p=0.046). No grade 4 and grade 5 complications were observed according to the Clavien system in patients. CONCLUSION: Factors such as second transurethral resection of the prostate surgery, history of preoperative catheter insertion, high postoperative white blood cell count, and long postoperative catheterization time increase the risk of urethral stricture after bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate.

Does the use of a small-size resectoscope during enucleation prevent transient urinary leakage and urethral stricture following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the use of a small-size resectoscope for enucleation during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) on the prevention of transient urinary leakage (TUL) and urethral stricture (US). METHODS: One hundred patients were included in a retrospective single-center study from January 2019 to December 2020. The patients were divided into two groups according to the resectoscope size which was used for enucleation (22F in group A [n = 40] and 26F in group B [n = 60]). Patients were evaluated at 4, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively for TUL and US. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were implemented to assess the variables which are associated with TUL at 4 weeks. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics and perioperative data were observed to be well balanced between groups. A statistically significant higher occurrence of TUL was detected at 4 weeks in group B compared to group A (P = .018). Higher improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) was observed in group A at 4 and 12 weeks postoperatively. On univariate analysis, resectoscope size, specimen weight, and body mass index were significant predictive factors for TUL at 4 weeks. Multivariate analysis illustrated that the resectoscope size was independently associated with TUL at 4 weeks after HoLEP (odds ratio = 3.1 [1.02-9.38]). One patient in group A (2.5%) and two patients in group B (5%) demonstrated US (P = .648). CONCLUSION: Enucleation with a 22F resectoscope provides better QoL and IPSS by reducing TUL rates in the early postoperative period.

MRI in patients with urethral stricture: a systematic review.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is gaining acceptance as a diagnostic tool in urethral stricture disease. Numerous publications emphasize on the advantages of MRI including its ability to determine periurethral spongiofibrosis, thus overcoming the main limitation of retrograde urethrography (RUG). It is also becoming an alternative for sonourethrography (SUG), which is a highly subjective examination. Magnetic resonance urethrography (MRU) has become an increasingly appreciated tool for diagnosing patients with urethral stricture disease. Obtained data provides radiologists and urethral reconstructive surgeons with additional information regarding anatomical relationships and periurethral tissue details, facilitating further treatment planning. Considering the great prevalence of urethral stricture disease and necessity of using accurate, and acceptable diagnostic method, this review was designed to provide radiologists and clinicians with a systematic review of the literature on the use of MRI in the urethral stricture disease.

Bulbomembranous Urethral Strictures Repair After Surgical Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Experience From a Latin American Referral Centre.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate stricture recurrence and urinary incontinence (UI) rates in patients who underwent bulbomembranous anastomosis for management of short (≤ 2cm) bulbomembranous urethral stricture (BMS) after benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgical treatment. In addition, we studied if there was any relation between post urethroplasty UI and the method employed for BPH surgical treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between January 2011 and October 2019. We included all patients who developed BMS after undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate, Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate or Open Simple Prostatectomy (OSP). We excluded patients with UI after BPH surgical treatment as well as patients who underwent a dorsal or ventral onlay oral graft urethroplasty for longer proximal bulbar strictures, and also patients with associated bladder neck contracture or other strictures locations. We defined failure as the need for any intervention to restore the urethral caliber. RESULTS: Overall, 77 patients were included in the study with mean age 70 years (sd 8). Median BMS length was 1.5 cm (IQR 1-2). Median follow-up was 53 months (IQR 24 to 82). Of the patients, 74/77 (96.1%) were classified as success and 3/77 (3.9%), as failure. Out of the 6/77 (7.8%) patients who had postoperative UI, 5 of them had been treated for their BPH with OSP (p 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bulbomembranous anastomosis is a suitable reconstructive option for short proximal bulbar urethral strictures after BPH surgical treatment. OSP was associated with postoperative UI more frequently than endoscopic treatments modalities.

The Importance of Cystoscopy in Diagnosis and Treatment of Urethral Stricture Following Transurethral Prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Transurethral prostatectomy is the gold standard surgical treatment of bladder outlet obstruction due to benign enlargement of the prostate, with more than 30,000 procedures performed annually in the United States alone. The success rate of this minimally invasive procedure is high and the results are durable. The development of urethral stricture is a long-term complication of the procedure and is noted in about 2% of patients. The stricture narrows the urethral lumen, leading to re-appearance of obstructive urinary symptoms. Traditionally, the evaluation of the stricture was performed by retrograde urethrography. Advancements in the fields of flexible endoscopy allowed rapid inspection of the urethra and immediate dilatation of the stricture in selected cases. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of urethrography versus cystoscopy in the evaluation of urethral strictures following transurethral prostatectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of a series of 32 consecutive patients treated due to post-transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) urethral stricture. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent both tests. In 16 there was concordance between the two tests. Four patients had no pathological findings in urethrography but had strictures in cystoscopy. All strictures were short (up to 10 mm) and were easily treated during cystoscopy, with no complaints or re-surgery needed in 24 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Cystoscopy was superior to urethrography in the evaluation of post-TURP strictures. Strictures where often short and treated during the same procedure. We recommend that cystoscopy be the procedure of choice in evaluating obstructive urinary symptoms after TURP, and retrograde urethrography be preserved for selected cases.

Pyuria and Post-Operation Urinary Tract Infection after Diode Laser Vaporesection of the Prostate.

Background: Monopolar transurethral resection of prostate (m-TURP) remains the gold standard for benign prostate obstruction (BPO). Recently developed laser surgical technique provides fewer peri-operative complications with equivalent outcomes. Diode laser vaporesection (DiLRP) offers better hemostasis, shorter catheterization duration, and shorter hospital stay, however, deep thermal penetration might cause prolonged prostatic urethra inflammation and subsequent complications. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the pyuria duration and post-operative urinary tract infection sequelae (POUTIs) between DiLRP and m-TURP. Methods: From July 2011 to September 2015, we retrieved medical records for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from prostate obstruction who underwent m-TURP and DiLRP. Demographic characteristics were recorded from a computerized database. The duration of pyuria after operation was compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis and risk factors were evaluated by Cox regression analysis. Results: One hundred twelve patients underwent DiLRP and 81 underwent m-TURP performed by the same surgeon during the same period. The mean age of the patients was 72 ± 7.3 years in the DiLRP group and 70 ± 7.6 years in the m-TURP group (p = 0.069). There was a higher percentage of anticoagulant used in the DiLRP group than in the m-TURP group (18.5% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.028). Operation time was longer but post-operative normal saline irrigation interval was shorter in DiLRP compared with m-TURP, respectively (62.8 ± 20.6 vs. 47.4 ± 22.1 minutes, p < 0.001; 2.1 ± 0.3 vs. 2.5 ± 0.9 days, p < 0.001). The post-operative infections were statistically significantly higher in the DiLRP group, including epididymitis (10.2% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.013) and POUTIs-related hospitalization (8.3% vs. 1.2%, p=0.031).The DiLRP resulted in longer pyuria period (16 vs. 12 weeks, p = 0.0014), with factors including operative method by DiLRP (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.828, p = 0.003) and age (HR: 0.665, p = 0.040). Conclusions: According to our study, DiLRP associated with more POUTIs is possibly caused by a longer pyuria period. Further larger prospective studies are necessary for the evaluation of the association between post-operative pyuria and POUTIs.