Etoposide pharmacokinetics impact the outcomes of lymphoma patients treated with BEAM regimen and ASCT: a multicenter study of the LYmphoma Study Association (LYSA).

BACKGROUND: Relationships between pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of etoposide and toxicity survivals were reported in cancer patients treated at standard doses. The clinical impact of PK variations of etoposide high doses has never been explored in lymphoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The primary objective of LYMPK study was to prospectively assess the impact of etoposide PK parameters on outcomes in lymphoma patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy regimen (carmustine, cytarabine, etoposide and melphalan) followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Individual etoposide PK parameters were estimated with a previously reported bi-compartment model using NONMEM(®) program. The impact of PK parameters on toxicity and survival was assessed using univariate/multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients with malignant lymphoma [non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): 79; Hodgkin's lymphoma: 12] at first line (n = 49) or relapse (n = 42) were enrolled in five centers. Large inter-individual variabilities in individual PK values were found for the same administration doses. In NHL patients, cumulative higher trough concentrations over the eight administrations of the first cycle (TotC min, categorized by the median 58.71 mg/L) had significant prognostic value regarding the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS: 73.6 vs 46.5 %, P = 0.015) and 5-year overall survival (OS: 74.0 vs 52.2 %, P = 0.034). Using a Cox model analysis, integrating disease settings (first line vs recurrent disease), simplified IPI and other prognostic factors, TotC min was the only significant independent prognostic factor influencing PFS, disease-specific survival and OS. CONCLUSION: This prospective study suggests survival of NHL patients treated with BEAM regimen and ASCT might be improved by increasing etoposide administration dose, or plasma concentration-based adjustment.

Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of liposomal etoposide in rats.

Precipitation of etoposide and adverse events associated with the co-solvents in intravenous solutions can be avoided by using liposomal etoposide (LE). The pharmacokinetics and distribution of the commercial formulation (ETPI) and LE were compared in rats. The pharmacokinetic profiles were biphasic and similar in the initial phase (C(max), Vd, and t(1/2alpha)). However, LE showed a 60% increase in AUC with a 35% decrease in clearance (p < 0.05). This decreased clearance resulted in a 70% increase in the MRT of etoposide. The uptake of etoposide from LE was higher in macrophage-phagocytic endowed tissues indicating that LE is superior to ETPI for targeted delivery of etoposide.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the selective, non-peptidic inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase BAY 12-9566 in combination with etoposide and carboplatin.

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are zinc-dependent endopeptidases that degrade the extracellular matrix during the processes of invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis. BAY 12-9566 (BAY) is a selective, non-peptidic biphenyl inhibitor of MMPs, with nanomolar inhibitory activity against MMP-2, -3 and -9, and anti-invasive, anti-metastatic and anti-angiogenic activity in a variety of tumor models. This phase I study of oral BAY was conducted to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of BAY when administered in combination with etoposide (VP-16) or in combination with VP-16 and carboplatin (CBDCA) in subjects with advanced cancer. The first cohort of patients (n=8) received a cycle of VP-16, 60 mg/m, followed 1 week later by a fixed daily oral dose of BAY, 800 mg b.i.d., to which three potential possible doses of VP-16 (low dose: 60 mg/m; mid dose: 90 mg/m; high dose: 120 mg/m) were added every 3 weeks as tolerated. The second cohort (n=5) received VP-16 (120 mg/m) and CBDCA (AUC=5) followed 1 week later by a fixed daily oral dose of BAY (800 mg) b.i.d., to which VP-16 (120 mg/m) and CBDCA (AUC=5) were added. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as toxicity grade 3 or above. Maximum tolerated dose was declared if two or more patients experienced DLT. A performance status of 0-2 and acceptable organ function were required for eligibility. Plasma concentrations of BAY and VP-16 were measured to investigate pharmacokinetic interactions. Eight eligible patients with a variety of tumor types (median age 64 years, range 44-76) were enrolled in the first cohort, six of who whom completed all three levels of VP-16. Progressive disease occurred in five of the eight patients; three patients continued on study with treatment. Drug level and pharmacokinetics analysis of BAY and VP-16 were also determined. The combination of BAY and VP-16 was tolerable in the first cohort, permitting enrollment of the second cohort. In the second cohort (n=5), the combination of BAY, VP-16 and CDBCA was intolerable at the doses used due to excessive hematologic toxicity in the first five patients enrolled. Pharmacokinetics and toxicity analysis was performed for this group of patients. Only Level 1 of treatment was completed for Cohort II. At this point the study was halted due to toxicity and the results of an interim analysis that failed to demonstrate sufficient clinical activity of this compound in other clinical trials. We conclude that the combination of BAY and VP-16 was well tolerated. However, the combination of BAY, VP-16 and CDBCA produces significant hematologic toxicity. Findings from this study may help to direct further studies with other inhibitors of MMPs.

Effect of etoposide on the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in vivo.

The effect of etoposide on the pharmakokinetics of methotrexate (MTX) was examined in vivo. High-dose (5g/m2/24 h) MTX therapy was combined with two etoposide (100mg/m2/ 1 h) infusions as a part of the medulloblastoma protocol developed in our department. Vepesid therapy was administered in two different schedules. The first group of patients received etoposide immediately before and at the end (24 h) of MTX treatment. The second group was treated with etoposide at 24 and at 48 h after starting MTX infusion. In this latter group both treatment-related grade III and grade IV toxicity developed more frequently than in the first group (58.6 versus 29.2%, for grade 3 toxicity p=0.019, for grade 4 toxic signs p=0.040, respectively). We observed that after the second dose of etoposide given at 48 h (second group) both total and unbound serum MTX levels (determined by high-performance liquid chromatography) were elevated by 53-109 and 26-65%, respectively, by the third hour after completion of Vepesid infusion. This effect was detectable for 6 h. All the liver and kidney functions of the patients were within the normal range. These results suggest the possibility of partial recirculation of extra/intracellular MTX into the blood after etoposide administration. Based on these results, the therapeutic protocol has been modified, and Vepesid is given prior to and at the end (24 h) of high-dose MTX treatment. Under these conditions only a slight decrease of MTX elimination has been detected between 25 and 28 h. These results emphasize the role of possible schedule-dependent interactions of cytostatic drugs.

Determination of the cytotoxic catechol metabolite of etoposide (3'O-demethyletoposide) in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography.

The anticancer drug etoposide undergoes O-demethylation in humans. The formed catechol metabolite exhibits significant cytotoxic activity. A simple, rapid, selective, and sensitive reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography assay was developed for the measurement of etoposide catechol in plasma of tumour patients. The metabolite was quantified using electrochemical detection. Ascorbic acid was added to each sample to prevent oxidation of etoposide catechol during sample preparation. Linear responses were obtained between 40 ng/ml and 1.25 microg/ml with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.991. The detection limit was 10 ng/ml. Recovery, within-day precision, between-day precision and accuracy were satisfactory. The method has been applied to characterize the concentration-time profile of etoposide catechol in plasma of tumour patients following administration of high-dose etoposide.

Assessment of toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics following intravenous administration of etoposide phosphate in beagle dogs.

The toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics of etoposide phosphate (BMY-40481), a water soluble phosphate ester derivative of etoposide, were investigated in beagle dogs (N = 4) following 5 min i.v. infusion doses equivalent to 57, 114 and 461 mg/m2 of etoposide. The doses were administered in sequence starting with the low dose. There was a 28 day wash-out period between the doses. Serial blood samples were collected over 32 hr and the levels of intact BMY-40481 and etoposide in plasma were measured using validated HPLC assays. Hematology profiles were obtained at pre-dose, and twice a week post-dose for 28 days to correlate systemic exposure to etoposide and hematologic toxicity. Following i.v. administration, plasma concentrations of BMY-40481 declined rapidly. For the 3 doses, mean t 1/2 of BMY-40481 ranged from 0.11-0.17 hr (6.6-11 min). The mean Cmax and AUC values of BMY-40481 ranged from 1.72-40.5 micrograms/ml and 0.16-4.14 hr.micrograms/ml, respectively. Both systemic clearance and steady state volume of distribution of BMY-40481 decreased significantly at the high dose. In contrast, the mean Cmax and AUC values of etoposide ranged from 5.46-39.4 micrograms/ml and 2.28-22.6 hr.micrograms/ml, respectively. Cmax occurred at the end of infusion (5 min) at all dose levels, indicating that etoposide was rapidly formed from BMY-40481. The apparent systemic clearance (range: 342-435 ml/min/m2) and apparent steady state volume of distribution (range: 21.5-26.6 l/m2) of etoposide were dose-independent. The AUC of etoposide was significantly correlated with hematologic toxicity, i.e., percent decreases in white blood count (WBC), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and platelets.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Etoposide pharmacokinetics in children: the development and prospective validation of a dosing equation.

Pharmacokinetic studies of etoposide administered at 100-200 mg/m2 to 33 children are described. Twenty-seven studies were performed in children aged < 10 years. Repeat studies were performed in 11 patients. Median pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: plasma clearance, 26 ml/min/m2; volume of distribution, 4.9 liters/m2; area under the etoposide plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), 3.9 mg/ml x min per 100 mg/m2. Interindividual variability in pharmacokinetic parameters was large (coefficient of variation (CV) = 30, 28, and 27%, respectively) in comparison with intraindividual variability (CV = 12, 14, and 12%, respectively). Variability in AUC was much greater in those patients treated with 150-200 mg/m2 etoposide than with 100 mg/m2 (CV, 35 versus 13%) and was related to variability in renal function and prior exposure to cisplatin. Data from the first 20 studies were used to develop pharmacokinetic monitoring equations which were validated in a further 13 patients. The most accurate equation relies upon the elimination constant of 51Cr-EDTA and a single blood specimen taken at the end of the etoposide infusion. [formula: see text] where K = 51Cr-EDTA elimination rate constant. This equation showed no significant bias, and the predictive error was small with respect to AUC calculated according to a two-compartment model. Predictive error did not increase with increasing AUC, whereas a marked increase in predictive error was seen for dosing according to body surface area. Dosing according to body surface area alone led to marked over- or underexposure to etoposide in 8 patients. Pharmacokinetic monitoring using the equation described would have identified these patients and permitted dose modification. This approach provides an accurate means of monitoring etoposide AUC for administration times of 1-4 h without the need for detailed pharmacokinetic sampling. It will allow a significant reduction in the variability of exposure seen with surface area-based dosing.