Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 470
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Evid Based Med ; 17(1): 54-64, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38465845

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sole impact of blinding patients and outcome assessors in acupuncture randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on treatment effects while considering the type of outcome measures. METHODS: We searched databases for the meta-analyses on acupuncture with both blinded and non-blinded RCTs. Mixed-effects meta-regression models estimated the average ratio of odds ratios (ROR) and differences in standardized mean differences (dSMD) for non-blinded RCTs versus blinded mixed-effects meta-regression model. RESULTS: The study included 96 meta-analyses (1012 trials). The average ROR for lack of patient blinding was 1.08 (95% confidence intervals 0.79-1.49) in 18 meta-analyses with binary patient-reported outcomes. The average ROR for lack of outcome assessor blinding was 0.98 (0.77-1.24) in 43 meta-analyses with binary subjective outcomes. The average dSMD was -0.38 (-0.96 to 0.20) in 10 meta-analyses with continuous patient-reported outcomes. The average dSMD was -0.13 (-0.45 to 0.18) in 25 meta-analyses with continuous subjective outcomes. The results of the subgroup analysis were consistent with the primary analysis findings. CONCLUSIONS: Blinding of participants and outcome assessors does not significantly influence acupuncture treatment efficacy. It underscores the practical difficulties of blinding in acupuncture RCTs and the necessity to distinguish between trials with and without successful blinding to understand treatment expectations' effects. Enhancing blinding procedures' quality and assessment in future research is crucial for improving RCTs' internal validity and reliability.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos
2.
BMJ Open ; 13(10): e075856, 2023 10 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37844991

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Most Asian countries have employed Chinese medicine (CM) and Western medicine to treat lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Evidence synthesis and comparison of effectiveness are difficult since outcomes examined and presented through trials possess heterogeneity. This study aimed to solve the outcome problems for CM clinical trials in LSS by building a core outcome set (COS). METHODS: To achieve an agreement on a set of core outcome domains, a four-phase study was carried out. First, we identified candidate outcome domains by systematically reviewing trials. In addition, we identified outcome domains associated with patients by conducting semistructured interviews with patients. Next, outcome domains were processed through a national two-round Delphi survey, in which 18 patients and 21 experts were recruited. Finally, the above domains were converted as a core outcome domain set based on a consensus meeting, in which 24 stakeholders were recruited. RESULTS: Seventeen outcome subdomains were identified by the systematic review and interviews. The Delphi survey assigned a priority to four outcome domains in the first round and four outcomes additionally in the second round. The core outcome domains were determined through discussion and redefinition of outcomes in the consensus meeting: pain and discomfort, health-related quality of life, lumbar function, activities of daily living, measures of walking, patient global assessment, adverse events and CM-specific outcomes. CONCLUSION: COS-CM-LSS is likely to enhance the consistency of outcomes reported in clinical trials. In-depth research should be conducted for the exploration of the best methods to examine the above outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Tradicional China , Estenosis Espinal , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Actividades Cotidianas , Técnica Delphi , Proyectos de Investigación , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 86: 35-47, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37688832

RESUMEN

Surgical care today is no longer evaluated only on clinical outcomes but also on holistic patient wellbeing. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a representation of the patient's perspective on their results and wellbeing. The aim of this review is to establish PROs as the center of healthcare and plastic surgery, to delineate important PROs in plastic surgery practice and research, to discuss the future of PROs within our discipline, and to encourage surgeons to incorporate PROs into their practice. PROs are an important parallel of clinical outcomes in that they can use the patient's perspective to 1) support clinical findings, 2) detect differences in care when there are no clear clinical differences, 3) track progress longitudinally, and 4) support systemic improvements in healthcare. Plastic surgery as a field is naturally aligned with PROs because, as a discipline, we focus on patient form and function. The emerging forefronts of plastic surgery such as lymphedema care, gender-affirming care, peripheral nerve surgery, migraine surgery, and breast implant illness are critically dependent on PROs. In the next decade, we predict that there will be a continued proliferation of robust PRO measures and integration into healthcare delivery. Outcomes research in surgery should continue to evolve as surgeons provide increasingly more benefits to improve patient wellbeing. Plastic surgeons must continue to play a prominent role in the future of PROs.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Cirujanos , Humanos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Atención a la Salud
4.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 23(1): 96, 2023 04 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37081403

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are debates in acupuncture related systematic reviews and meta-analyses on whether searching Chinese databases to get more Chinese-language studies may increase the risk of bias and overestimate the effect size, and whether the treatment effects of acupuncture differ between Chinese and non-Chinese populations. METHODS: In this meta-epidemiological study, we searched the Cochrane library from its inception until December 2021, and identified systematic reviews and meta-analyses with acupuncture as one of the interventions. Paired reviewers independently screened the reviews and extracted the information. We repeated the meta-analysis of the selected outcomes to separately pool the results of Chinese- and non-Chinese-language acupuncture studies and presented the pooled estimates as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). We calculated the Ratio of ORs (ROR) by dividing the OR of the Chinese-language trials by the OR of the non-Chinese-language trials, and the ROR by dividing the OR of trials addressing Chinese population by the OR of trials addressing non-Chinese population. We explored whether the impact of a high risk of bias on the effect size differed between studies published in Chinese- and in non-Chinese-language, and whether the treatment effects of acupuncture differed between Chinese and non-Chinese population. RESULTS: We identified 84 Cochrane acupuncture reviews involving 33 Cochrane groups, of which 31 reviews (37%) searched Chinese databases. Searching versus not searching Chinese databases significantly increased the contribution of Chinese-language literature both to the total number of included trials (54% vs. 15%) and the sample size (40% vs. 15%). When compared with non-Chinese-language trials, Chinese-language trials were associated with a larger effect size (pooled ROR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.91). We also observed a higher risk of bias in Chinese-language trials in blinding of participants and personnel (97% vs. 51%) and blinding of outcome assessment (93% vs. 47%). The higher risk of bias was associated with a larger effect estimate in both Chinese-language (allocation concealment: high/unclear risk vs. low risk, ROR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.87) and non-Chinese-language studies (blinding of participants and personnel: high/unclear risk vs. low risk, ROR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.74). However, we found no evidence that the higher risk of bias would increase the effect size of acupuncture in Chinese-language studies more often than in non-Chinese-language studies (the confidence intervals of all ROR in the high-risk group included 1, Table 3). We further found acupuncture appeared to be more effective in Chinese than in non-Chinese population (Table 4). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest the higher risk of bias may lead to an overestimation of the treatment effects of acupuncture but would not increase the treatment effects in Chinese-language studies more often than in other language studies. The difference in treatment effects of acupuncture was probably associated with differences in population characteristics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: We registered our protocol on the Open Science Framework (OSF) ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PZ6XR ).


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura , Humanos , Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Sesgo , Lenguaje , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Tamaño de la Muestra , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Metaanálisis como Asunto
5.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 65(2): 254-263, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35869637

RESUMEN

AIM: To develop a core set of outcome domains to be measured in clinical studies on lower limb orthopaedic surgery for ambulant children with cerebral palsy (CP) that represents the priorities of an international multi-stakeholder group (children, parent/carers, and health professionals). METHOD: Potential outcome domains were identified through literature review and qualitative interviews with key stakeholders. These were scored in an international two-round Delphi survey, using a 9-point Likert scale. A final consensus meeting with key stakeholders agreed on the most important outcome domains and refined the core outcome set (COS). RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-one health professionals and 36 individuals with CP and their parents/carers rated 21 of 41 outcomes as important in the Delphi survey. The final consensus group agreed 19 outcomes within eight domains to be included in the final COS: pain and fatigue, lower limb structure, motor function, mobility (daily life activities), gait-related outcomes, physical activity, independence, and quality of life. INTERPRETATION: A COS for lower limb orthopaedic surgery for children with CP was developed. Incorporating this in the design of future clinical studies will provide a more holistic assessment of the impact of treatment while allowing meaningful comparisons and future synthesis of results from primary studies. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Eight core outcome domains were identified as important to measure in future clinical research. Key stakeholders perceived pain, balance and fall, and independence as very important outcomes. Six contextual factors were identified as essential in surgical decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Parálisis Cerebral , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Niño , Humanos , Parálisis Cerebral/cirugía , Técnica Delphi , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
BMJ Open ; 12(11): e062497, 2022 Nov 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36368756

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Globally, rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is an important cause of acquired heart disease in children and adolescents. Clinical trials on RHD treatment with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) or integrated medicine are gradually increasing in China. However, because the outcomes of clinical trials are subject to heterogeneity and selective reporting, similar studies cannot be merged and compared, complicating assessing the effectiveness and safety of TCM, and diminishing the value of clinical trials. Therefore, there is an urgent need to design a TCM or integrated medicine core outcome set (COS) for RHD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The development of this study will take place in four stages under the direction of a multidisciplinary advisory board. (1) Establishing a comprehensive outcomes checklist through a systematic review of previously published research, retrieval of clinical trial registration centres, patient's semistructured interviews, and clinician's questionnaire surveys; (2) Screen stakeholder groups from various fields to participate in the Delphi survey; (3) Two e-Delphi surveys will be conducted to determine the outcomes of various concerned stakeholder groups; (4) Hold a face-to-face consensus meeting to develop the COS-TCM-RHD. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The ethical approval for this study has been obtained from the Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Ethics Committee (TJUTCM-EC20210008). The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study has been registered at the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database (Registration #1743).


Asunto(s)
Medicina Tradicional China , Cardiopatía Reumática , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Técnica Delphi , Medicina Tradicional China/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Proyectos de Investigación , Cardiopatía Reumática/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Trials ; 23(1): 871, 2022 Oct 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36224599

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a devastating disease, its mortality and disability rate are high. In China, hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) is responsible for 75% of all the cases of primary ICH. A lot of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for treating HICH have been carried out. However, these RCTs have a lot of problems, such as heterogeneous outcomes, non-uniform point of measurement. These lead to systematic review/meta-analysis only can include a small number of studies. And outcome measures did not take the wishes of patients and other stakeholders into account. The aim of this study is to establish the core outcome set (COS) for future TCM clinical trials of HICH. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: First, we will develop a long list of general outcomes by making systematic literature review and semi-structured interviews. Then healthcare professionals and patients with HICH will be invited to participate in two rounds of the Delphi survey to determine the importance of the outcome. Finally, a face-to-face consensus meeting will be conducted to determine the final COS of HICH, including what outcomes should be measured and when and how to measure the outcomes. RESULTS: We aim to develop a COS that includes TCM core syndrome for HICH to determine what outcomes should be reported and when and how to measure them. CONCLUSION: By doing this, we can increase the reporting consistency and reduce the reporting bias in the outcome, which leads to the reuse of research data in meta-analysis and the making of informed healthcare decisions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The entire project has received approval from the Ethics Committee of Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences. The final COS will be published and reported at the national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials database as study 1475 . Registered on December 2019.


Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Intracraneal Hipertensiva , Medicina Tradicional China , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Hemorragia Intracraneal Hipertensiva/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Intracraneal Hipertensiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicina Tradicional China/efectos adversos , Medicina Tradicional China/métodos , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Proyectos de Investigación , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
BMJ Open ; 12(9): e057712, 2022 09 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36180121

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Primary brain tumours, specifically gliomas, are a rare disease group. The disease and treatment negatively impacts on patients and those close to them. The high rates of physical and cognitive morbidity differ from other cancers causing reduced health-related quality of life. Glioma trials using outcomes that allow holistic analysis of treatment benefits and risks enable informed care decisions. Currently, outcome assessment in glioma trials is inconsistent, hindering evidence synthesis. A core outcome set (COS) - an agreed minimum set of outcomes to be measured and reported - may address this. International initiatives focus on defining core outcomes assessments across brain tumour types. This protocol describes the development of a COS involving UK stakeholders for use in glioma trials, applicable across glioma types, with provision to identify subsets as required. Due to stakeholder interest in data reported from the patient perspective, outcomes from the COS that can be patient-reported will be identified. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Stage I: (1) trial registry review to identify outcomes collected in glioma trials and (2) systematic review of qualitative literature exploring glioma patient and key stakeholder research priorities. Stage II: semi-structured interviews with glioma patients and caregivers. Outcome lists will be generated from stages I and II. Stage III: study team will remove duplicate items from the outcome lists and ensure accessible terminology for inclusion in the Delphi survey. Stage IV: a two-round Delphi process whereby the outcomes will be rated by key stakeholders. Stage V: a consensus meeting where participants will finalise the COS. The study team will identify the COS outcomes that can be patient-reported. Further research is needed to match patient-reported outcomes to available measures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained (REF SMREC 21/59, Cardiff University School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee). Study findings will be disseminated widely through conferences and journal publication. The final COS will be adopted and promoted by patient and carer groups and its use by funders encouraged. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021236979.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Técnica Delphi , Glioma/terapia , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Proyectos de Investigación , Participación de los Interesados , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 65(3): 390-398, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34759246

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical intervention for Crohn's disease involving the colon is often a total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy. There are limited data regarding postoperative small bowel recurrence rates in the recent era. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of small bowel Crohn's disease recurrence following total proctocolectomy and secondarily define risk factors for disease recurrence. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at four hospitals within a single healthcare system. PATIENTS: Patients were those with Crohn's disease undergoing total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy between 2009-2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures were clinical, endoscopic, radiographic, and/or surgical Crohn's disease recurrence. RESULTS: In total, 193 patients were included with a median follow-up of 1.8 years (IQR 0.4-4.6). Overall, 74.6% (n = 144) of patients had been previously exposed to biologic therapy, and 51.3% (n = 99) had a history of small bowel Crohn's disease. Postoperatively, 14.5% (n = 28) of patients received biologic therapy. Crohn's disease recurrence occurred in 23.3% (n = 45) of patients with an estimated median 5-year recurrence rate of 40.8% (95% CI' 30.2-51.4). Surgical recurrence occurred in 8.8% (n = 17) of patients with an estimated median 5-year recurrence rate of 16.9% (95% CI' 8.5-25.3). On multivariable analysis, prior small bowel surgery for Crohn's disease (HR 2.61; 95% CI' 1.42-4.81) and Crohn's diagnosis at age <18 years (HR 2.56; 95% CI' 1.40-4.71) were associated with Crohn's recurrence. In patients without prior small bowel Crohn's disease, 14.9% (n = 14) had Crohn's recurrence with an estimated 5-year overall recurrence rate of 31.1% (95% CI' 13.3-45.3) and 5-year surgical recurrence rate of 5.7% (95% CI' 0.0-12.0). LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective design and lack of consistent follow-up on all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Greater than one third of patients who underwent total proctocolectomy for Crohn's disease were estimated to have small bowel Crohn's recurrence at 5 years after surgery. Patients with a history of small bowel surgery for Crohn's and diagnosis at any early age may benefit from more intensive postoperative surveillance and consideration for early medical prophylaxis. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B762. RECURRENCIA FRECUENTE DE LA ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN DEL INTESTINO DELGADO DESPUS DE LA PROCTOCOLECTOMA TOTAL POR COLITIS DE CROHN: ANTECEDENTES:La cirugia para la enfermedad de Crohn que involucra el colon es a menudo una proctocolectomía total con ileostomía terminal. Hay datos limitados con respecto a las tasas de recurrencia posoperatoria de la enfermedad de Crohn del intestino delgado en la actualidad.OBJETIVO:Buscamos determinar la tasa de recurrencia de la enfermedad de Crohn del intestino delgado después de la proctocolectomía total y, en segundo lugar, definir los factores de riesgo de recurrencia de la enfermedad.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLINICO:Cuatro hospitales de un mismo sistema sanitario.PACIENTES:Pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn sometidos a proctocolectomía total con ileostomía terminal entre 2009-2019.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Recurrencia clínica, endoscópica, radiográfica y / o quirúrgica de la enfermedad de Crohn.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 193 pacientes con un seguimiento promedio de 1,8 años (IQR 0,4-4,6). El 74,6% (n = 144) de los pacientes habían recibido previamente terapia biológica y el 51,3% (n = 99) tenían antecedentes de enfermedad de Crohn del intestino delgado. Después de la operación, el 14,5% (n = 28) de los pacientes recibieron terapia biológica. La recurrencia de la enfermedad de Crohn ocurrió en el 23,3% (n = 45) de los pacientes con una tasa de recurrencia media estimada a los 5 años del 40,8% (IC del 95%: 30,2-51,4). La recidiva quirúrgica se produjo en el 8,8% (n = 17) de los pacientes con una tasa de recidiva media estimada a los 5 años del 16,9% (IC del 95%: 8,5-25,3). En el análisis multivariable, la cirugía previa del intestino delgado para la enfermedad de Crohn (HR 2,61, IC del 95%: 1,42-4,81) y el diagnóstico de Crohn a la edad <18 (HR 2,56, IC del 95%: 1,40-4,71) se asociaron con la recurrencia de Crohn. En pacientes sin enfermedad previa de Crohn del intestino delgado, el 14,9% (n = 14) tuvo recurrencia de Crohn con una tasa de recurrencia general estimada a 5 años del 31,1% (IC del 95%: 13,3-45,3) y una tasa de recurrencia quirúrgica a 5 años del 5,7% (IC del 95%: 0,0-12,0).LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo, falta de seguimiento constante de todos los pacientes.CONCLUSIONES:Se estimó que más de un tercio de los pacientes que se sometieron a proctocolectomía total tenían recurrencia de Crohn del intestino delgado a los 5 años después de la cirugía. Los pacientes con antecedentes de cirugía por enfermedad de Crohn del intestino delgado y diagnóstico a una edad temprana pueden beneficiarse de una vigilancia posoperatoria más intensiva y la consideración de una profilaxis médica temprana. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B762. (Traducción- Dr. Ingrid Melo).


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn , Ileostomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Reoperación , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Terapia Biológica/métodos , Terapia Biológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Crohn/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Ileostomía/efectos adversos , Ileostomía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Recurrencia , Reoperación/métodos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo
10.
J Ethnopharmacol ; 285: 114905, 2022 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34896205

RESUMEN

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Tongue coating has been used as an effective signature of health in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). The level of greasy coating closely relates to the strength of dampness or pathogenic qi in TCM theory. Previous empirical studies and our systematic review have shown the relation between greasy coating and various diseases, including gastroenteropathy, coronary heart disease, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the objective and intelligent greasy coating and related diseases recognition methods are still lacking. The construction of the artificial intelligent tongue recognition models may provide important syndrome diagnosis and efficacy evaluation methods, and contribute to the understanding of ethnopharmacological mechanisms based on TCM theory. AIM OF THE STUDY: The present study aimed to develop an artificial intelligent model for greasy tongue coating recognition and explore its application in COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Herein, we developed greasy tongue coating recognition networks (GreasyCoatNet) using convolutional neural network technique and a relatively large (N = 1486) set of tongue images from standard devices. Tests were performed using both cross-validation procedures and a new dataset (N = 50) captured by common cameras. Besides, the accuracy and time efficiency comparisons between the GreasyCoatNet and doctors were also conducted. Finally, the model was transferred to recognize the greasy coating level of COVID-19. RESULTS: The overall accuracy in 3-level greasy coating classification with cross-validation was 88.8% and accuracy on new dataset was 82.0%, indicating that GreasyCoatNet can obtain robust greasy coating estimates from diverse datasets. In addition, we conducted user study to confirm that our GreasyCoatNet outperforms TCM practitioners, yet only consuming roughly 1% of doctors' examination time. Critically, we demonstrated that GreasyCoatNet, along with transfer learning, can construct more proper classifier of COVID-19, compared to directly training classifier on patient versus control datasets. We, therefore, derived a disease-specific deep learning network by finetuning the generic GreasyCoatNet. CONCLUSIONS: Our framework may provide an important research paradigm for differentiating tongue characteristics, diagnosing TCM syndrome, tracking disease progression, and evaluating intervention efficacy, exhibiting its unique potential in clinical applications.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Técnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticos , Etnofarmacología/métodos , Medicina Tradicional China/métodos , Lengua , Inteligencia Artificial , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/terapia , Humanos , Redes Neurales de la Computación , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Qi , SARS-CoV-2 , Lengua/microbiología , Lengua/patología
11.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 17274, 2021 08 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34446791

RESUMEN

Understanding and improving memory are vital to enhance human life. Theta rhythm is associated with memory consolidation and coding, but the trainability and effects on long-term memory of theta rhythm are unknown. This study investigated the ability to improve long-term memory using a neurofeedback (NFB) technique reflecting the theta/low-beta power ratio on an electroencephalogram (EEG). Our study consisted of three stages. First, the long-term memory of participants was measured. In the second stage, the participants in the NFB group received 3 days of theta/low-beta NFB training. In the third stage, the long-term memory was measured again. The NFB group had better episodic and semantic long-term memory than the control group and significant differences in brain activity between episodic and semantic memory during the recall tests were revealed. These findings suggest that it is possible to improve episodic and semantic long-term memory abilities through theta/low-beta NFB training.


Asunto(s)
Ritmo beta/fisiología , Memoria a Largo Plazo/fisiología , Neurorretroalimentación/métodos , Desempeño Psicomotor/fisiología , Semántica , Ritmo Teta/fisiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Electroencefalografía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Memoria a Corto Plazo/fisiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
12.
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J ; 19(1): 127, 2021 Aug 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34404425

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: High-intensity glucocorticoid regimens are commonly used to induce and maintain remission in Juvenile Dermatomyositis but are associated with several adverse side-effects. Evidence-based treatment guidelines from North American and European pediatric rheumatology research societies both advocate induction with intravenous pulse steroids followed by high dose oral steroids (2 mg/kg/day), which are then tapered. This study reports the time to disease control with reduced glucocorticoid dosing. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records at a single tertiary-care children's hospital of patients diagnosed with Juvenile Dermatomyositis between 2000 and 2014 who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The primary outcome measure was time to control of muscle and skin disease. Additional outcome measures included glucocorticoid dosing, effect of treatment on height, frequency of calcinosis, and complications from treatment. RESULTS: Of the 69 patients followed during the study period, 31 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Median length of follow-up was 4.58 years, (IQR 3-7.5). Myositis control was achieved in a median of 7.1 months (IQR 0.9-63.4). Cutaneous disease control was achieved in a median of 16.7 months (IQR 4.3-89.5). The median starting dose of glucocorticoids was 0.85 mg/kg/day, (IQR 0.5-1.74). The median duration of steroid treatment was 9.1 months, (IQR 4.7-17.4), while the median duration of any pharmacotherapy was 29.2 months (IQR 10.4 to 121.3). Sustained disease control off medications was achieved in 21/31 (68%) patients by the end of review. Persistent calcinosis was identified in only one patient (3%). CONCLUSION: Current accepted treatment paradigms for Juvenile Dermatomyositis include oral glucocorticoids beginning at 2 mg/kg/day and reduced over a prolonged time period. However, our results suggest that treatment using reduced doses and duration with early use of steroid-sparing agents is comparably effective in achieving favorable outcomes in Juvenile Dermatomyositis.


Asunto(s)
Calcinosis , Dermatomiositis , Reducción Gradual de Medicamentos/métodos , Duración de la Terapia , Glucocorticoides , Administración Oral , Terapia Biológica/métodos , Calcinosis/etiología , Calcinosis/prevención & control , Niño , Dermatomiositis/sangre , Dermatomiositis/diagnóstico , Dermatomiositis/tratamiento farmacológico , Dermatomiositis/fisiopatología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Inducción de Remisión/métodos , Evaluación de Síntomas/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
Holist Nurs Pract ; 35(5): 281-289, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34407026

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to explore the psychological outcomes of a mindfulness-based Internet-streamed yoga video in breast cancer survivors. A one-group, repeated-measures, purposive sample using a directed qualitative descriptive and convergent mixed-methods approach was used. Participants were recruited from breast oncology practices across 2 settings in the northeastern United States in April 2019. Education about the video was provided, and the link to the video was sent to participants. Demographic information, Knowing Participation in Change Short Form (KPCSF), Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS), and the Generalized Anxiety Distress Scale (GAD-7) were obtained at baseline and at 2 and 4 weeks. A semistructured interview was conducted at 4 weeks. Thirty-five women (mean age = 56 years) participated. A one-group, repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated statistically significant changes occurred in all measures between week 0 and week 4: decreased GAD (t = -2.97, P = .004), improved WEMWBS (t = 2.52, P = .008), and increased KPC (t = 2.99, P = .004). Qualitative findings suggest the overall experience of the video was positive and the women would recommend its use to others. Improvements in all psychological measures were achieved with video use. Findings indicate an improvement in psychological measures and support the theory of Knowing Participation in Change. This work further contributes to accessible, flexible interventions available through the Internet and/or mobile applications aimed at improving breast cancer survivorship.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Atención Plena/normas , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Yoga/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Ansiedad/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Entrevistas como Asunto/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Plena/métodos , Atención Plena/estadística & datos numéricos , New England , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Investigación Cualitativa , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Pancreas ; 50(4): 506-512, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33939661

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) recommend complete (R0) surgical resection of the primary tumor and metastases, if feasible. However, large multicenter studies of recurrence patterns of GEPNETs after resection have not been performed. METHODS: Patients 18 years or older who presented to 7 participating National Comprehensive Cancer Network institutions between 2004 and 2008 with a new diagnosis of a small bowel, pancreas, or colon/rectum neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and underwent R0 resection of the primary tumor, and synchronous metastases, if present, were included in this analysis. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to calculate recurrence rates and time-associated end points, respectively. RESULTS: Of 294 patients with GEPNETs, 50% were male, 88% were White, and 99% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1. The median age was 55 years (range, 20-90). The median follow-up time from R0 resection was 62.1 months. Recurrence rates were 18% in small bowel NETs (n = 110), 26% in pancreatic NETs (n = 141), and 10% in colon/rectum NETs (n = 50). The frequency of surveillance imaging was highly variable. CONCLUSIONS: R0 resection was associated with variable risk of recurrence across subtypes. Further research to inform refinement of guidelines for the appropriate duration of surveillance after R0 resection is needed.


Asunto(s)
Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Intestinales/cirugía , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Intestinales/patología , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
15.
Pancreas ; 50(4): 513-515, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33939662

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Positively charged amino acids (AA) such as arginine/lysine are coinfused with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs to reduce rates of nephrotoxicity. In the phase 3 NETTER-1 trial, commercial AA formulations were used in association with 177Lu-DOTA-0-Tyr3-Octreotate (DOTATATE). These formulations were also used in an early-access program (EAP) before regulatory approval of 177Lu-DOTATATE. Our program transitioned to compounded l-arginine 2.5%/l-lysine 2.5% in 0.9% NaCl after commercial approval of 177Lu-DOTATATE. We sought to compare rates of nausea/vomiting with arginine/lysine versus commercial parenteral AA formulations. METHODS: Rates of nausea/vomiting of all 20 EAP patients who received commercial AAs (15% Clinisol) were compared with the first 29 patients to receive 177Lu-DOTATATE after commercial approval and coinfused with arginine/lysine. Other parameters reviewed included infusion rates, need for PRN nausea medications, and other toxicities. RESULTS: Seventeen percent of patients who received compounded arginine/lysine experienced nausea, compared with 100% of patients in the EAP group (P < 0.0001). Infusion-related reactions occurred in 3% of the arginine/lysine cohort versus 35% in the EAP group. Infusion durations were substantially shorter in the arginine/lysine cohort (reduced by 61%). CONCLUSIONS: Coinfusions of arginine/lysine with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs result in substantially lower rates of nausea/vomiting compared with commercial AA formulations designed for parenteral nutrition.


Asunto(s)
Aminoácidos/uso terapéutico , Náusea/diagnóstico , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/terapia , Octreótido/análogos & derivados , Compuestos Organometálicos/uso terapéutico , Nutrición Parenteral/métodos , Vómitos/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aminoácidos/administración & dosificación , Aminoácidos/efectos adversos , Arginina/administración & dosificación , Arginina/efectos adversos , Arginina/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Bombas de Infusión , Lisina/administración & dosificación , Lisina/efectos adversos , Lisina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/etiología , Octreótido/administración & dosificación , Octreótido/efectos adversos , Octreótido/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Organometálicos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Organometálicos/efectos adversos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Nutrición Parenteral/efectos adversos , Radiofármacos/administración & dosificación , Radiofármacos/efectos adversos , Radiofármacos/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Péptidos/química , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vómitos/etiología
16.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 173, 2021 Feb 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33596881

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The standard to ensure utmost cancer treatment is a prerequisite in national cancer plans for comprehensive cancer centers (CCCs) and ensured through multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs). Despite these being compulsory for CCCs, various analyses on MTBs have been performed, since MTBs are resource-intensive. Outcome measures in these prior analyses had been survival (OS), MTB-adherence and -satisfaction, inclusion of patients into clinical trials and better cancer care. MAIN BODY: A publication from Freytag et al. performed an analysis in multiple tumor entities and assessed the effect of number of MTBs. By matched-pair analysis, they compared response and OS of patients, whose cases were discussed in MTBs vs. those that were not. The analysis included 454 patients and 66 different tumor types. Only patients with > 3 MTBs showed a significantly better OS than patients with no MTB meeting. Response to treatment, relapse free survival and time to progression were not found to be better, nor was there any difference for a specific tumor entity with vs. without MTB discussions. An in-depth discussion of these results, with respect to the literature (PubMed search: "MTBs AND cancer") and within the author group, including statisticians specialized in data analysis of cancer patients and questions addressed in MTBs, was performed to interpret these findings. We conclude that the results by Freytag et al. are deceiving due to an "immortal time bias" that requires more careful data interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: The result of Freytag et al. of a seemingly positive impact of higher number of MTBs needs to be interpreted cautiously: their presumed better OS in patients with > 3 MTB discussions is misleading, due to an immortal time bias. Here patients need to survive long enough to be discussed more often. Therefore, these results should not lead to the conclusion that more MTBs will "automatically" increase cancer patients' OS, rather than that the insightful discussion, at best in MTBs and with statisticians, will generate meaningful advice, that is important for cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Neoplasias/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Humanos
17.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 5(1): pkaa090, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33604509

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Concerns have emerged about the higher risk of fatal coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in cancer patients. In this article, we review the experience of a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: A prospective registry was set up at Institut Curie at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. All cancer patients with suspected or proven COVID-19 were entered and actively followed for 28 days. RESULTS: Among 9842 patients treated at Institut Curie between March 13 and May 1, 2020, 141 (1.4%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, based on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing and/or computerized tomography scan. In line with our case mix, breast cancer (40.4%) was the most common tumor type, followed by hematological and lung malignancies. Patients with active cancer therapy or/and advanced cancer accounted for 87.9% and 68.9% of patients, respectively. At diagnosis, 78.7% of patients had COVID-19-related symptoms, with an extent of lung parenchyma involvement inferior to 50% in 95.8% of patients. Blood count variations and C-reactive protein elevation were the most common laboratory abnormalities. Antibiotics and antiviral agents were administered in 48.2% and 6.4% of patients, respectively. At the time of analysis, 26 patients (18.4%) have died from COVID-19, and 100 (70.9%) were cured. Independent prognostic factors at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis associated with death or intensive care unit admission were extent of COVID-19 pneumonia and decreased O2 saturation. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 incidence and presentation in cancer patients appear to be very similar to those in the general population. The outcome of COVID-19 is primarily driven by the initial severity of infection rather than patient or cancer characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Neoplasias/terapia , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Análisis de Supervivencia
18.
BMJ Open ; 11(1): e044278, 2021 01 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33478966

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the predictive utility of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care '6-Clicks' daily activity and basic mobility functional assessment short forms on inpatient discharge to home compared with skilled nursing facilities, including by diagnostic group (trauma injury, major lower joint replacement/reattachment, spinal fusion excluding cervical), as well as assess the effect of the short forms on 30-day inpatient readmissions. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort study of electronic health record data. SETTING: Five hospitals in a multistate, integrated healthcare system serving a large, rural US population. PARTICIPANTS: The population-based adult (age ≥18) sample of acute care hospitalised patients receiving rehabilitation services included 10 316 patients with 12 314 hospital admissions from the year prior to 6-Clicks implementation (1 June 2015-31 May 2016) (pre-6-Clicks cohort) and 10 931 patients with 13 241 admissions from the year after 6-Clicks implementation (1 January 2017-31 December 2017) (post-6-Clicks cohort). Patients were admitted for major lower joint replacement/reattachment, spinal fusion excluding cervical, trauma injury or another reason. INTERVENTION: Occupational and physical therapist use of 6-Clicks daily activity and basic mobility short forms in the post-6-Clicks cohort. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Discharge disposition (home, including to assisted living, or skilled nursing facility, including swing beds) and 30-day inpatient readmissions. RESULTS: Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.82-0.92 (daily activity) and 0.87-0.94 (basic mobility) for discharge to home or skilled nursing facilities, with trauma and spinal fusion patients having the highest values. Daily activity and basic mobility standardised positive and negative predictive values were highest for the three diagnostic groups compared with the full study sample. Few significant differences in 30-day readmissions were seen between pre- and post-6-Clicks cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: 6-Clicks performed well when distinguishing between discharge home or skilled nursing facilities, especially by diagnostic group, supporting use by occupational and physical therapists in discharge planning. Future research could assess where additional intervention or training may reduce 30-day readmissions.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente , Rehabilitación/normas , Atención Subaguda , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería
19.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 129: 12-20, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32987161

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate the consistency of risk of bias assessments for overlapping randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in systematic reviews (SRs) on acupuncture. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Databases were searched for acupuncture SRs. A weighted kappa (κ) statistic was calculated, and logistic regression was used to explore the factors of disagreements. RESULTS: We included 241 RCTs from 109 SRs on acupuncture. The percentage disagreements ranged from 25% to 44%, with moderate agreement for random sequence generation (κ = 0.57), allocation concealment (κ = 0.50), and incomplete outcome data (κ = 0.50), besides fair agreement for blinding of participants and personnel (κ = 0.44), blinding of outcome assessment (κ = 0.31), and selective reporting (κ = 0.39). Only 19% RCTs were evaluated completely consistent. Methodological quality (random sequence generation, odds ratio (OR) = 3.46), international cooperation (allocation concealment, OR = 0.14; incomplete outcome data, OR = 0.14; selective reporting, OR = 0.05), and risk of bias reporting completeness score (selective reporting, OR = 0.53) significantly affected the relative odds of disagreements. CONCLUSION: The level of agreement varied from fair to moderate agreement depending on the risk of bias domain. Methodological quality appears to be an overarching factor to account for disagreements.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura , Sesgo , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Riesgo
20.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol ; 11(11): e00255, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33259160

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Chronic constipation (CC) is a recurrent functional bowel disorder worldwide. The purpose of this study is to examine its pooled placebo response rate and compare placebo response level in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with different endpoint assessments. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were electronically searched for therapeutic RCTs of CC with placebo control. Data extraction and assessment of risk of bias were performed independently by 2 reviewers. All the statistical calculation and analysis were performed using R 3.6.0. Our protocol has registered in PROSPERO with registration number: CRD42019121287. RESULTS: There were 46 studies included with 5,992 constipated patients allocated to the placebo arm in total. The pooled placebo response rate was 28.75% (95% confidence interval: 23.83%-33.67%) with significant heterogeneity among trials ((Equation is included in full-text article.)= 93.6%). Treatment efficacy assessed using subjective improvement had a significantly higher placebo response rate than that assessed with improvement in complete (spontaneous) bowel movements or composite improvement (41.40% vs 18.31% or 20.35%, P < 0.001). According to the results of meta-regression, active treatment and endpoint assessment were most likely to lead to the huge heterogeneity among studies. DISCUSSION: Patients with CC have significant response level to placebo. Based on findings in this study, we do not recommend subjective improvement as endpoint while designing therapeutic RCTs for chronic constipated patients.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/terapia , Suplementos Dietéticos , Laxativos/administración & dosificación , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Agonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT4/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Estudios Cruzados , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Efecto Placebo , Placebos/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA