Setting Guidelines for Electromagnetic Exposures and Research Needs.

Current limits for exposures to nonionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) are set, based on relatively short-term exposures. Long-term exposures to weak EMF are not addressed in the current guidelines. Nevertheless, a large and growing amount of evidence indicates that long-term exposure to weak fields can affect biological systems and might have effects on human health. If they do, the public health issues could be important because of the very large fraction of the population worldwide that is exposed. We also discuss research that needs to be done to clarify questions about the effects of weak fields. In addition to the current short-term exposure guidelines, we propose an approach to how weak field exposure guidelines for long-term exposures might be set, in which the responsibility for limiting exposure is divided between the manufacturer, system operator, and individual being exposed. Bioelectromagnetics. © 2020 Bioelectromagnetics Society.

Utilization of a Radiation Safety Time-Out Reduces Radiation Exposure During Electrophysiology Procedures.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether a radiation safety time-out reduces radiation exposure in electrophysiology procedures. BACKGROUND: Time-outs are integral to improving quality and safety. The authors hypothesized that a radiation safety time-out would reduce radiation exposure levels for patients and the health care team members. METHODS: The study was performed at the New York University Langone Health Electrophysiology Lab. Baseline data were collected for 6 months prior to the time-out. On implementation of the time-out, data were collected prospectively with analyses to be performed every 3 months. The primary endpoint was dose area product. The secondary endpoints included reference point dose, fluoroscopy time, use of additional shielding, and use of alternative imaging such as intracardiac and intravascular ultrasound. RESULTS: A total of 1,040 patient cases were included. The median dose area product prior to time-out was 18.7 Gy∙cm2, and the median during the time-out was 14.7 Gy∙cm2, representing a 21% reduction (p = 0.007). The median reference point dose prior to time-out was 163 mGy, and during the time-out was 122 mGy (p = 0.011). The use of sterile disposable protective shields and ultrasound imaging for access increased significantly during the time-out. CONCLUSIONS: A radiation safety time-out significantly reduces radiation exposure in electrophysiology procedures. Electrophysiology laboratories, as well as other areas of cardiovascular medicine using fluoroscopy, should strongly consider the use of radiation safety time-outs to reduce radiation exposure and improve safety.

Radiation dose benchmarks in pediatric cardiac catheterization: A prospective multi-center C3PO-QI study.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to update benchmark values to use a quality measure prospectively. BACKGROUND: Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Outcomes Project - Quality Improvement (C3PO-QI), a multi-center registry, defined initial radiation dose benchmarks retrospectively across common interventional procedures. These data facilitated a dose metric endorsed by the American College of Cardiology in 2014. METHODS: Data was collected prospectively by 9 C3PO-QI institutions with complete case capture between 1/1/2014 and 6/30/2015. Radiation was measured in total air kerma (mGy), dose area product (DAP) (µGy*M2 ), DAP per body weight, and fluoroscopy time (min), and reported by age group as median, 75th and 95th %ile for the following six interventional procedures: (1) atrial septal defect closure; (2) aortic valvuloplasty; (3) treatment of coarctation of the aorta; (4) patent ductus arteriosus closure; (5) pulmonary valvuloplasty; and (6) transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation. RESULTS: The study was comprised of 1,680 unique cases meeting inclusion criteria. Radiation doses were lowest for pulmonary valvuloplasty (age <1 yrs, median mGy: 59, DAP: 249) and highest in transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation (age >15 yrs, median mGy: 1835, DAP: 17990). DAP/kg standardized outcome measures across weights within an age group and procedure type significantly more than DAP alone. Radiation doses decreased for all procedures compared to those reported previously by both median and median weight-based percentile curves. These differences in radiation exposure were observed without changes in median fluoroscopy time. CONCLUSIONS: This study updates previously established benchmarks to reflect QI efforts over time. These thresholds can be applied for quality measurement and comparison. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Feasibility of Administering High-Dose (131) I-MIBG Therapy to Children with High-Risk Neuroblastoma Without Lead-Lined Rooms.

BACKGROUND: Although (131) I-metaiodobenzylguanidine ((131) I-MIBG) therapy is increasingly used for children with high-risk neuroblastoma, a paucity of lead-lined rooms limits its wider use. We implemented radiation safety procedures to comply with New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene regulations for therapeutic radioisotopes and administered (131) I-MIBG using rolling lead shields. PROCEDURE: Patients received 0.67 GBq (18 mCi)/kg/dose (131) I-MIBG on an IRB-approved protocol (NCT00107289). Radiation safety procedures included private room with installation of rolling lead shields to maintain area dose rates ≤0.02 mSv/hr outside the room, patient isolation until dose rate <0.07 mSv/hr at 1 m, and retention of a urinary catheter with collection of urine in lead boxes. Parents were permitted in the patient's room behind lead shields, trained in radiation safety principles, and given real-time radiation monitors. RESULTS: Records on 16 (131) I-MIBG infusions among 10 patients (age 2-11 years) were reviewed. Mean ± standard deviation (131) I-MIBG administered was 17.67 ± 11.14 (range: 6.11-40.59) GBq. Mean maximum dose rates outside treatment rooms were 0.013 ± 0.008 mSv/hr. Median time-to-discharge was 3 days post-(131) I-MIBG. Exposure of medical staff and parents was below regulatory limits. Cumulative whole-body dose received by the physician, nurse, and radiation safety officer during treatment was 0.098 ± 0.058, 0.056 ± 0.045, 0.055 ± 0.050 mSv, respectively. Cumulative exposure to parents was 0.978 ± 0.579 mSv. Estimated annual radiation exposure for inpatient nurses was 0.096 ± 0.034 mSv/nurse. Thyroid bioassay scans on all medical personnel showed less than detectable activity. Contamination surveys were <200 dpm/100 cm(2) . CONCLUSIONS: The use of rolling lead shields and implementation of specific radiation safety procedures allows administration of high-dose (131) I-MIBG and may broaden its use without dedicated lead-lined rooms.