Transcriptional regulation of human DUSP4 gene by cancer-related transcription factors.

Dual specificity phosphatase 4 (DUSP4), a member of the dual specificity phosphatase family, is responsible for the dephosphorylation and inactivation of ERK, JNK and p38, which are mitogen-activated protein kinases involved in cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis, but also in inflammation processes. Given its importance for cellular signalling, DUSP4 is subjected to a tight regulation and there is growing evidence that its expression is dysregulated in several tumours. However, the mechanisms underlying DUSP4 transcriptional regulation remain poorly understood. Here, we analysed the regulation of the human DUSP4 promoters 1 and 2, located upstream of exons 1 and 2, respectively, by the cancer-related transcription factors (TFs) STAT3, FOXA1, CTCF and YY1. The presence of binding sites for these TFs was predicted in both promoters through the in silico analysis of DUSP4, and their functionality was assessed through luciferase activity assays. Regulatory activity of the TFs tested was found to be promoter-specific. While CTCF stimulated the activity of promoter 2 that controls the transcription of variants 2 and X1, STAT3 stimulated the activity of promoter 1 that controls the transcription of variant 1. YY1 positively regulated both promoters, although to different extents. Through site-directed mutagenesis, the functionality of YY1 binding sites present in promoter 2 was confirmed. This study provides novel insights into the transcriptional regulation of DUSP4, contributing to a better comprehension of the mechanisms of its dysregulation observed in several types of cancer.

Clinical relevance of gene expression in localized and metastatic prostate cancer exemplified by FABP5.

PURPOSE: Fatty acid-binding protein 5 (FABP5), a transport protein for lipophilic molecules, has been proposed as protein marker in prostate cancer (PCa). The role of FABP5 gene expression is merely unknown. METHODS: In two cohorts of PCa patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (n = 40 and n = 57) and one cohort of patients treated with palliative transurethral resection of the prostate (pTUR-P; n = 50) FABP5 mRNA expression was analyzed with qRT-PCR. Expression was correlated with clinical parameters. BPH tissue samples served as control. To independently validate findings on FABP5 expression, three microarray and sequencing datasets were reanalyzed (MSKCC 2010 n = 216; TCGA 2015 n = 333; mCRPC, Nature Medicine 2016 n = 114). FABP5 expression was correlated with ERG-fusion status, TCGA subtypes, cancer driver mutations and the expression of druggable downstream pathway components. RESULTS: FABP5 was overexpressed in PCa compared to BPH in the cohorts analyzed by qRT-PCR (radical prostatectomy p = 0.003, p = 0.010; pTUR-P p = 0.002). FABP5 expression was independent of T stage, Gleason Score, nodal status and PSA level. FABP5 overexpression was associated with the absence of TMPRSS2:ERG fusion (p < 0.001 in TCGA and MSKCC). Correlation with TCGA subtypes revealed FABP5 overexpression to be associated with SPOP and FOXA1 mutations. FABP5 was positively correlated with potential drug targets located downstream of FABP5 in the PPAR-signaling pathway. CONCLUSION: FABP5 overexpression is frequent in PCa, but seems to be restricted to TMPRESS2:ERG fusion-negative tumors and is associated with SPOP and FOXA1 mutations. FABP5 overexpression appears to be indicative for increased activity in PPAR signaling, which is potentially druggable.

Low FOXA1 expression predicts good response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy resulting in good outcomes for luminal HER2-negative breast cancer cases.

BACKGROUND: FOXA1 expression is a good prognostic marker for endocrine therapy in hormone-positive breast cancer. We retrospectively examined breast cancer patients with luminal human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative tumours, as defined by immunohistochemistry, who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and investigated the relationship between treatment effects and FOXA1 expression. METHODS: Biopsy specimens from 103 luminal HER2-negative tumours were immunohistochemically examined. FOXA1 effects on chemo-sensitivity were also investigated employing in vitro experiments. RESULTS: FOXA1 and Ki67 expressions independently predicted a pathological complete response (pCR). Knockdown of FOXA1 by siRNA boosted the chemo-effect in oestrogen receptor-positive cells. The Cox hazards model revealed a pCR to be the strongest factor predicting a good patient outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our present study showed low FOXA1 expression to be associated with a good response to NAC in luminal HER2-negative breast cancer. Improved outcomes of these patients suggest that NAC should be recommended to patients with low FOXA1 tumours.