Growth differentiation factor-15 stimulates the synthesis of corticotropin-releasing factor in hypothalamic 4B cells.

Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF15) is a stress-activated cytokine that regulates cell growth and inflammatory and stress responses. We previously reported the role and regulation of GDF15 in pituitary corticotrophs. Dexamethasone increases Gdf15 gene expression levels and production. GDF15 suppresses adrenocorticotropic hormone synthesis in pituitary corticotrophs and subsequently mediates the negative feedback effect of glucocorticoids. Here, we analyzed corticotropin-releasing factor (Crf) promoter activity in hypothalamic 4B cells transfected with promoter-driven luciferase reporter constructs. The effects of time and GDF15 concentration on Crf mRNA levels were analyzed using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor family receptor α-like (GFRAL) protein is expressed in 4B cells. GDF15 increased Crf promoter activity and Crf mRNA levels in 4B cells. The protein kinase A and C pathways also contributed to the GDF15-induced increase in Crf gene expression. GDF15 stimulates GFRAL, subsequently increasing the phosphorylation of AKT, an extracellular signal-related kinase, and the cAMP response element-binding protein. Therefore, GDF15-dependent pathways may be involved in regulating Crf expression under stressful conditions in hypothalamic cells.

The Growth Differentiation Factor 11 is Involved in Skin Fibroblast Ageing and is Induced by a Preparation of Peptides and Sugars Derived from Plant Cell Cultures.

Ageing is a complex and progressive phenomenon, during which the accumulation of morphological and chemical changes seriously compromises the capacity of the cells to proliferate and fulfil their biological tasks. The increase in the average age of the world population, associated with a higher occurrence of age-related diseases, is prompting scientific research to look for new strategies and molecular targets that may help in alleviating age-related phenotypes. Growth factors, responsible for modulating several aging markers in many tissues and organs, represent valuable targets to fight age-associated dysfunctions. The growth differentiation factor GDF11, a TGF-ß family member, has been associated with the maintenance of youth phenotypes in different human tissues and organs, and in the skin has been related to an inhibition of the inflammatory response. We investigated the role of GDF11 in skin dermal fibroblasts, and we observed that its expression and activity were reduced in fibroblasts deriving from adult donors compared to neonatal ones. The main effect of GDF11 was the induction of collagen I and III, in both neonatal and adult fibroblasts, by triggering Smad signalling in a TGF-ß-like fashion. Moreover, by analysing a number of plant extracts having GDF11 inducing activity, we found that a peptide/sugar preparation, obtained from Lotus japonicus somatic embryo cultures, was capable of restoring GDF11 expression in older fibroblasts and to activate the synthesis of collagen I, collagen III and periostin, an important protein involved in collagen assembly.

Housekeeping Gene Stability in Human Mesenchymal Stem and Tendon Cells Exposed to Tenogenic Factors.

The use of biochemical inducers of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) differentiation into tenogenic lineage represents an investigated aspect of tendon disorder treatment. Bone morphogenetic protein 12 (BMP-12) is a widely studied factor, representing along with ascorbic acid (AA) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) one of the most promising stimulus in this context so far. Quantitative gene expression of specific tenogenic marker is commonly used to assess the efficacy of these supplements. Nevertheless, the reliability of these data is strongly associated with the choice of stable housekeeping genes. To date, no published studies have evaluated the stability of housekeeping genes in MSCs during tenogenic induction. Three candidate housekeeping genes (YWHAZ, RPL13A, and GAPDH) in human MSCs from bone marrow (BMSCs), adipose tissue (ASCs), and tendon cells (TCs) supplemented with BMP-12 or AA and bFGF in comparison with control untreated cells for 3 and 10 days were evaluated. GeNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper tools and the comparative ΔCt method were used to evaluate housekeeping gene stability and the overall ranking was determined by using by the RefFinder algorithm. In all culture conditions, YWHAZ was the most stable gene and RPL13A was the second choice. YWHAZ and RPL13A were the two most stable genes also for ASCs and BMSCs, regardless of the time point analyzed, and for TCs at 10 days of tenogenic induction. Only for TCs at 3 days of tenogenic induction were GAPDH and YWHAZ the best performers. In conclusion, our findings will be useful for the proper selection of housekeeping genes in studies involving MSCs cultured in the presence of tenogenic factors, to obtain accurate and high-quality data from quantitative gene expression analysis.

Effect of BMP-12, TGF-ß1 and autologous conditioned serum on growth factor expression in Achilles tendon healing.

PURPOSE: Achilles tendon ruptures are devastating and recover slowly and incompletely. There is a great demand for biomolecular therapies to improve recovery, yet little is understood about growth factors in a healing tendon. Here, the role of growth factors during tendon healing in a rat model and their reaction to single and multiple growth factor treatment are explored. METHODS: Rat tendons were transected surgically and resutured. The expression of bFGF, BMP-12, VEGF and TGF-ß1 was assessed by immunohistochemical analysis one to 8 weeks after surgery. Paracrine effects of TGF-ß1 or BMP-12 added by adenoviral transfer, as well as the effect of autologous conditioned serum (ACS) on growth factor expression, were evaluated. RESULTS: bFGF, BMP-12 and VEGF expression was highest 1 week after transection. bFGF and BMP-12 declined during the remaining period whereas VEGF expression persisted. TGF-ß1 expression dramatically increased after 8 weeks. ACS treatment increased bFGF (P = 0.007) and BMP-12 (P = 0.004) expression significantly after 8 weeks. Also overall expression of bFGF, BMP-12 and TGF-ß1 regardless of time point was significantly greater than controls with ACS treatment (P < 0.05). Both BMP-12 and TGF-ß1 treatments had no significant effect. No effect was observed in VEGF with any treatment. CONCLUSION: bFGF, BMP-12, VEGF and TGF-ß1 are differentially expressed during tendon healing. Additional BMP-12 or TGF-ß1 has no significant influence, whereas ACS generally increases expression of all factors except VEGF. Staged application of multiple growth factors may be the most promising biomolecular treatment.

Treatment with rhBMP12 or rhBMP13 increase the rate and the quality of rat Achilles tendon repair.

Tendon injuries that result in partial or complete tears often come from chronic, repetitive use, or from sudden trauma. In some cases, torn tendons can be repaired, but such repairs often fail to completely restore tendon function. We used global gene expression profiling and histological examination to study tendon repair to elucidate key molecular processes that regulate the rate and quality of tissue restoration. Using a rat Achilles tendon transection model, tissue was collected at 3, 7, 10, and 15 days postinjury. The pattern of gene expression in the repairing tissue paralleled the healing phases of inflammation, matrix formation, and matrix reorganization. Newly formed repaired tissue is characterized by cells expressing many genes associated with tendon formation, thereby potentially distinguishing this repair tissue from other types of repair or scar tissue. Addition of recombinant human bone morphogenic protein (rhBMP)12 or rhBMP13, also known as growth and differentiation factors (GDFs) 6 and 7, 1 day after injury yielded increases in tissue volume, rate of cellular infiltration, and in changes in levels of key mRNAs involved in tendon repair. Altogether, our results indicate that rhBMP12 or rhBMP13 enhance the rate of tendon repair. A better understanding of the key molecular regulators of tendon repair could lead to the development of new therapies for tendon injuries and the identification of diagnostic markers that indicate the status of tendon repair after injury.