New Author Guidelines for Displaying Data and Reporting Data Analysis and Statistical Methods in Experimental Biology.

The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics has revised the Instructions to Authors for Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, and Molecular Pharmacology These revisions relate to data analysis (including statistical analysis) and reporting but do not tell investigators how to design and perform their experiments. Their overall focus is on greater granularity in the description of what has been done and found. Key recommendations include the need to differentiate between preplanned, hypothesis-testing, and exploratory experiments or studies; explanations of whether key elements of study design, such as sample size and choice of specific statistical tests, had been specified before any data were obtained or adapted thereafter; and explanations of whether any outliers (data points or entire experiments) were eliminated and when the rules for doing so had been defined. Variability should be described by S.D. or interquartile range, and precision should be described by confidence intervals; S.E. should not be used. P values should be used sparingly; in most cases, reporting differences or ratios (effect sizes) with their confidence intervals will be preferred. Depiction of data in figures should provide as much granularity as possible, e.g., by replacing bar graphs with scatter plots wherever feasible and violin or box-and-whisker plots when not. This editorial explains the revisions and the underlying scientific rationale. We believe that these revised guidelines will lead to a less biased and more transparent reporting of research findings.

Nordic symposium on "toxicology and pharmacology without animal experiments-Will it be possible in the next 10 years?"

Toxicological and pharmacological information from human cells and tissues provides knowledge readily applicable to human safety assessment and to the efficacy assessment of pharmaceuticals. The 3R principle in animal studies includes the use of human material in the R of Replacement. The Reduction and Refinement Rs are related to animal use. Knowledge of the 3Rs and successful 3R methods are a prerequisite for the Reduction of animal experiments in the future. More collaboration among researchers using experimental animals and those working in vitro is necessary with mutual respect. The OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals have included the animal-free part of the 3Rs in guidances for the development and reporting of Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs), which is to be part of the Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA). The 3R centres established to help fulfil the Directive 2010/63/EU play an important role to promote the 3Rs and in the development of animal-free toxicology. Research centres in each Nordic country are founded upon solid research activities in cell and organ toxicity, including major EU programmes to promote 3Rs and implementation of good practices and methods broadly in all stakeholders of industry, regulators and academia. In the light of this, the Nordic Symposium on Toxicology and Pharmacology without Animal Experiments addressed more adopted/modified test guidelines or new test guidelines for new end-points, or hazard challenges, new in vitro 3D models, speeding up transfer of knowledge from research to regulation to understand AOP and towards IATA.

An overview of the safety pharmacology society strategic plan.

Safety Pharmacology studies are conducted to characterize the confidence by which biologically active new chemical entities (NCE) may be anticipated as safe. Non-clinical safety pharmacology studies aim to detect and characterize potentially undesirable pharmacodynamic activities using an array of in silico, in vitro and in vivo animal models. While a broad spectrum of methodological innovation and advancement of the science occurs within the Safety Pharmacology Society, the society also focuses on partnerships with health authorities and technology providers and facilitates interaction with organizations of common interest such as pharmacology, physiology, neuroscience, cardiology and toxicology. Education remains a primary emphasis for the society through content derived from regional and annual meetings, webinars and publication of its works it seeks to inform the general scientific and regulatory community. In considering the future of safety pharmacology the society has developed a strategy to successfully navigate forward and not be mired in stagnation of the discipline. Strategy can be defined in numerous ways but generally involves establishing and setting goals, determining what actions are needed to achieve those goals, and mobilizing resources within the society to accomplish the actions. The discipline remains in rapid evolution and its coverage is certain to expand to provide better guidance for more systems in the next few years. This overview from the Safety Pharmacology Society will outline the strategic plan from 2016 to 2018 and beyond and provide insight into the future of the discipline which builds upon a previous strategic plan established in 2009.

Safety pharmacology methods and models in an evolving regulatory environment.

This editorial prefaces the annual themed issue on safety pharmacology (SP) methods published in the Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods (JPTM). We highlight here the content derived from the recent 2016 Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS), Canadian Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (CSPT), and Japanese Safety Pharmacology Society (JSPS) joint meeting held in Vancouver, B.C., Canada. This issue of JPTM continues the tradition of providing a publication summary of articles primarily presented at the joint meeting with direct bearing on the discipline of SP. As the regulatory landscape is expected to evolve with revision announced for the existing guidance document on non-clinical proarrhythmia risk assessment (ICHS7B) there is also imminent inception of the Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative. Thus, the field of SP is dynamically progressing with characterization and implementation of numerous alternative non-clinical safety models. Novel method development and refinement in all areas of the discipline are reflected in the content.

Cardiac voltage-gated ion channels in safety pharmacology: Review of the landscape leading to the CiPA initiative.

Voltage gated ion channels are central in defining the fundamental properties of the ventricular cardiac action potential (AP), and are also involved in the development of drug-induced arrhythmias. Many drugs can inhibit cardiac ion currents, including the Na+ current (INa), L-type Ca2+ current (Ica-L), and K+ currents (Ito, IK1, IKs, and IKr), and thereby affect AP properties in a manner that can trigger or sustain cardiac arrhythmias. Since publication of ICH E14 and S7B over a decade ago, there has been a focus on drug effects on QT prolongation clinically, and on the rapidly activating delayed rectifier current (IKr), nonclinically, for evaluation of proarrhythmic risk. This focus on QT interval prolongation and a single ionic current likely impacted negatively some drugs that lack proarrhythmic liability in humans. To rectify this issue, the Comprehensive in vitro proarrhythmia assay (CiPA) initiative has been proposed to integrate drug effects on multiple cardiac ionic currents with in silico modelling of human ventricular action potentials, and in vitro data obtained from human stem cell-derived ventricular cardiomyocytes to estimate proarrhythmic risk of new drugs with improved accuracy. In this review, we present the physiological functions and the molecular basis of major cardiac ion channels that contribute to the ventricle AP, and discuss the CiPA paradigm in drug development.

Investigation of Elemental Mass Spectrometry in Pharmacology for Peptide Quantitation at Femtomolar Levels.

In the search of new robust and environmental-friendly analytical methods able to answer quantitative issues in pharmacology, we explore liquid chromatography (LC) associated with elemental mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to monitor peptides in such complex biological matrices. The novelty is to use mass spectrometry to replace radiolabelling and radioactivity measurements, which represent up-to now the gold standard to measure organic compound concentrations in life science. As a proof of concept, we choose the vasopressin (AVP)/V1A receptor system for model pharmacological assays. The capacity of ICP-MS to provide highly sensitive quantitation of metallic and hetero elements, whatever the sample medium, prompted us to investigate this technique in combination with appropriate labelling of the peptide of interest. Selenium, that is scarcely present in biological media, was selected as a good compromise between ICP-MS response, covalent tagging ability using conventional sulfur chemistry and peptide detection specificity. Applying selenium monitoring by elemental mass spectrometry in pharmacology is challenging due to the very high salt content and organic material complexity of the samples that produces polyatomic aggregates and thus potentially mass interferences with selenium detection. Hyphenation with a chromatographic separation was found compulsory. Noteworthy, we aimed to develop a straightforward quantitative protocol that can be performed in any laboratory equipped with a standard macrobore LC-ICP-MS system, in order to avoid time-consuming sample treatment or special implementation of instrumental set-up, while allowing efficient suppression of all mass interferences to reach the targeted sensitivity. Significantly, a quantification limit of 57 ng Se L-1 (72 femtomoles of injected Se) was achieved, the samples issued from the pharmacological assays being directly introduced into the LC-ICP-MS system. The established method was successfully validated and applied to the measurement of the vasopressin ligand affinity for its V1A receptor through the determination of the dissociation constant (Kd) which was compared to the one recorded with conventional radioactivity assays.

Recalibration of nonclinical safety pharmacology assessment to anticipate evolving regulatory expectations.

Safety pharmacology (SP) has evolved in terms of architecture and content since the inception of the SP Society (SPS). SP was initially focused on the issue of drug-induced QT prolongation, but has now become a broad spectrum discipline with expanding expectations for evaluation of drug adverse effect liability in all organ systems, not merely the narrow consideration of torsades de pointes (TdP) liability testing. An important part of the evolution of SP has been the elaboration of architecture for interrogation of non-clinical models in terms of model development, model validation and model implementation. While SP has been defined by mandatory cardiovascular, central nervous system (CNS) and respiratory system studies ever since the core battery was elaborated, it also involves evaluation of drug effects on other physiological systems. The current state of SP evolution is the incorporation of emerging new technologies in a wide range of non-clinical drug safety testing models. This will refine the SP process, while potentially expanding the core battery. The continued refinement of automated technologies (e.g., automated patch clamp systems) is enhancing the scope for detection of adverse effect liability (i.e., for more than just IKr blockade), while introducing a potential for speed and accuracy in cardiovascular and CNS SP by providing rapid, high throughput ion channel screening methods for implementation in early drug development. A variety of CNS liability assays, which exploit isolated brain tissue, and in vitro electrophysiological techniques, have provided an additional level of complimentary preclinical safety screens aimed at establishing the seizurogenic potential and risk for memory dysfunction of new chemical entities (NCEs). As with previous editorials that preface the annual themed issue on SP methods published in the Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods (JPTM), we highlight here the content derived from the most recent (2015) SPS meeting held in Prague, Czech Republic. This issue of JPTM continues the tradition of providing a publication summary of articles primarily presented at the SPS meeting with direct bearing on the discipline of SP. Novel method development and refinement in all areas of the discipline are reflected in the content.

Especialidades farmacéuticas de diagnóstico hospitalario (DH) y de uso hospitalario (H) / Medicines for hospital diagnostic and hospital use

Se considera la aparición y evolución de los conceptos uso hospitalario y diagnóstico hospitalario aplicados a determinadas especialidades farmacéuticas, la escasa e incompleta normativa publicada y se sugiere la conveniencia de establecer una regulación concreta oficial y, al mismo tiempo, que se completen aspectos no suficientemente claros

It consider the apparition and the evolution of the concepts for hospital use and for hospital diagnostic, applied to medicines, the limited and insufficient norm publish and suggest the convenience to establish one official regulation and to complete aspects not intelligible

Origins, practices and future of safety pharmacology.

The origins of safety pharmacology are grounded upon observations that organ functions (like organ structures) can be toxicological targets in humans exposed to novel therapeutic agents, and that drug effects on organ functions (unlike organ structures) are not readily detected by standard toxicological testing. Safety pharmacology is " em leader those studies that investigate the potential undesirable pharmacodynamic effects of a substance on physiological functions in relationship to exposure in the therapeutic range and above em leader " [International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) S7A guidelines; Safety Pharmacology Studies for Human Pharmaceuticals]. This publication provides a comprehensive review of the history of safety pharmacology, international regulatory guidelines that govern the practices of this important field, and the scientific challenges that are being faced by its rapid emergence in pharmaceutical development. The criticality of identifying undesired adverse effects of new drugs in nonclinical models, which reflect the overall human condition, is reflected in the importance of generating an integrated and accurate assessment of possible human risk. The conundrum posed by the challenge of formulating a reliable risk assessment is the importance of improving and enhancing the safe progression of new drugs to the marketplace, while preventing unnecessary delays (or discontinuances), based on nonclinical findings that are not relevant or interpretable in terms of clinical response or human risk.

Safety pharmacology: an essential interface of pharmacology and toxicology in the non-clinical assessment of new pharmaceuticals.

Safety pharmacology studies are defined as the studies that investigate the potential undesirable pharmacodynamic effects of a substance on physiological functions in relation to exposure. In consequence, these studies are an integral part of the non-clinical safety assessment of new pharmaceuticals, in association with toxicological studies. A retrospective shows the evolution of the discipline in these last years. Safety pharmacology studies are of special interest, and some drawbacks and pitfalls must be considered (i.e. invasive methods, difficulties related to GLP (good laboratory practices) requirements, choice of a strategy). In the future, some priority should be given to education, promotion of scientific activities, reinforcement of the links between pharmacologists and toxicologists and implementation of relevant guidelines.

The new pre-preclinical paradigm: compound optimization in early and late phase drug discovery.

The attrition rates of new chemical entities (NCEs) in preclinical and clinical development are staggeringly high. NCEs are abandoned due to insufficient efficacy, safety issues, and economic reasons. Uncovering drug defects that produce these failures as early as possible in drug discovery would be highly effective in lowing the cost and time of developing therapeutically useful drugs. Unfortunately, there is no single factor that can account for these NCE failures in preclinical and clinical development since factors, such as solubility, pKa, absorption, metabolism, formulation, pharmacokinetics, toxicity and efficacy, to name a few, are all interrelated. In addition, there are many problems in scaling-up drug candidates from the laboratory bench scale to the pilot plant scale. To address the problem of attrition rates of NCEs in preclinical and clinical development and drug scale-up issues, pharmaceutical companies need to reorganize their preclinical departments from a traditional linear approach to a parallel approach. In this review, a strategy is put forth to integrate certain aspects of drug metabolism/pharmacokinetics, toxicology functions and process chemistry into drug discovery. Compound optimization in early and late phase drug discovery occurs by relating factors such as physicochemical properties, in vitro absorption, in vitro metabolism, in vivo pharmacokinetics and drug scale-up issues to efficacy optimization. This pre-preclinical paradigm will improve the success rate of drug candidates entering development.

Estudios de toxicología preclínica para nuevos farmacos / Preclinical toxicology studies for new drugs

El objetivo de los estudios toxicológicos preclínicos de los nuevos fármacos es la caracterización del impacto fisiológico consecuente a su administración del impacto fisiológico consecuente a su administración. Para este fin se requiere hacer estudios en animales de laboratorio u otros modelos experimentales que demuestren la toxicidad o innocuidad del fármaco en experimentación. En el presente trabajo se describen los principios, metodología y lineamientos recomendados a nivel internacional para los estudios agudos, subcrónicos, crónicos, genotóxicos, así como los de toxicología de la reproducción. Este tipo de estudios se están efectuando actualmente con el nuevo anticonvulsionante DL-4-hidroxi, 4-hidroxi, 4-etil, 4-fenil butiramida (HEPB)

Development and submission of a nonclinical (pharmacology/toxicology) CANDA.

The experience with the submission of a nonclinical (pharmacology and toxicology) computer-assisted New Drug Application (CANDA) is reviewed. This system consisted of a stand-alone personal computer running several commercial programs in Microsoft Windows to access both text and data. WordPerfect was used as the word processor that contained all the documents and data tables (in read-only format) that were submitted in hard copy, and Andyne GQL was used as a tool to query the data in an Oracle relational database. Microsoft Excel was provided as a spreadsheet for graphics and analysis of data. Documents appeared virtually identical to those in the hard copy NDA submission. Searching the text was facilitated by the use of buttons on the screen, which allowed the NDA to be searched for a particular term. Data could be located either in WordPerfect documents, or in an Oracle database (using Andyne GQL) by querying the data. The data queries could be performed ad hoc, in which the reviewer selected all the parameters for a search, or with predefined query buttons, which retrieved data for principal treatment-related changes. This type of system also could serve as a useful model for both in-house nonclinical review and the submission of INDs and IND amendments.