Electrogram-only guided approach to His bundle pacing with minimal fluoroscopy: A single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: His bundle pacing (HBP) is the most physiological pacing. The standard technique based on fluoroscopic approach might be challenging and fluoro consuming. Targeting the His guided exclusively by the electrical signals could enable a precise lead implant, thus reducing fluoroscopy time (FT) and X-ray dose, desirable both for patients and operators. The aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety both acutely and at 30 days of the electrogram (EGM)-guided HBP with minimal or no fluoroscopy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between October and December 2018, 41 consecutive patients underwent EGM-guided HBP. Successful HBP was obtained in 39 (95%) patients, (30 males, 78 ± 10 years). Selective HBP (S-HBP) was achieved in 23 (59%), nonselective HBP (NS-HBP) in 16 (41%) patients. The final HBP lead position was reached in 31 (79.4%) patients without fluoroscopy, only guided by electrical signals. In eight patients a minimal fluoroscopy (mean, 8 seconds) has been required. The sheath's cutting and the slack of the lead were routinely performed under fluoroscopy. No difference was observed in FT for HBP lead placement in S-HBP and NS-HBP (mean, 8.1 ± 25 vs 7.5 ± 20 seconds, P = .8; median value 0 vs 0 seconds). No differences were observed in FT for the entire procedure, total dose area product and total procedural time in S-HBP and NS-HBP. Lead dislodgement occurred in one (2.6%) patient 1 day after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: HBP could be performed safely and efficiently using the EGMs, with minimal or no fluoroscopy. Fluoroscopy was required during sheath removal and atrial lead placement.

A left bundle branch block activation sequence and ventricular pacing influence voltage amplitudes: an in vivo and in silico study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the activation sequence on voltage amplitudes by evaluating regional voltage differences during a left bundle branch block (LBBB) activation sequence vs. a normal synchronous activation sequence and by evaluating pacing-induced voltage differences. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-one patients and three computer models without scar were studied. Regional voltage amplitudes were evaluated in nine LBBB patients who underwent endocardial electro-anatomic mapping (EAM). Pacing-induced voltage differences were evaluated in 12 patients who underwent epicardial EAM during intrinsic rhythm and right ventricular (RV) pacing. Three computer models customized for LBBB patients were created. Changes in voltage amplitudes after an LBBB (intrinsic), a normal synchronous, an RV pacing, and a left ventricular pacing activation sequence were assessed in the computer models. Unipolar voltage amplitudes in patients were approximately 4.5 mV (4.4-4.7 mV, ∼33%) lower in the septum when compared with other segments. A normal synchronous activation sequence in the computer models normalized voltage amplitudes in the septum. Pacing-induced differences were larger in electrograms with higher voltage amplitudes during intrinsic rhythm and furthermore larger and more variable at the epicardium [mean absolute difference: 3.6-6.2 mV, 40-53% of intrinsic value; interquartile range (IQR) differences: 53-63% of intrinsic value] compared to the endocardium (mean absolute difference: 3.3-3.8 mV, 28-30% of intrinsic value; IQR differences: 37-40% of intrinsic value). CONCLUSION: In patients and computer models without scar, lower septal unipolar voltage amplitudes are exclusively associated with an LBBB activation sequence. Pacing substantially affects voltage amplitudes, particularly at the epicardium.

Respuesta al ECG de enero de 2018 / Response to ECG, January 2018

No disponible