Effects of psoriasis and psoralen exposure on the somatic mutation landscape of the skin.

Somatic mutations are hypothesized to play a role in many non-neoplastic diseases. We performed whole-exome sequencing of 1,182 microbiopsies dissected from lesional and nonlesional epidermis from 111 patients with psoriasis to search for evidence that somatic mutations in keratinocytes may influence the disease process. Lesional skin remained highly polyclonal, showing no evidence of large-scale spread of clones carrying potentially pathogenic mutations. The mutation rate of keratinocytes was similarly only modestly affected by the disease. We found evidence of positive selection in previously reported driver genes NOTCH1, NOTCH2, TP53, FAT1 and PPM1D and also identified mutations in four genes (GXYLT1, CHEK2, ZFP36L2 and EEF1A1) that we hypothesize are selected for in squamous epithelium irrespective of disease status. Finally, we describe a mutational signature of psoralens-a class of chemicals previously found in some sunscreens and which are used as part of PUVA (psoralens and ultraviolet-A) photochemotherapy treatment for psoriasis.

Psoralen prevents the inactivation of estradiol and treats osteoporosis via covalently targeting HSD17B2.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Psoralea corylifolia L. seeds (P. corylifolia), popularly known as Buguzhi in traditional Chinese medicine, are often used to treat osteoporosis in China. Psoralen (Pso) is the key anti-osteoporosis constituent in P. corylifolia, however, its targets and mechanism of action are still unclear. AIM OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to explore the interaction between Pso and 17-ß hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (HSD17B2), an estrogen synthesis-related protein that inhibits the inactivation of estradiol (E2) to treat osteoporosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tissue distribution of Pso was analyzed by in-gel imaging after oral administration of an alkynyl-modified Pso probe (aPso) in mice. The target of Pso in the liver was identified and analyzed using chemical proteomics. Co-localization and cellular thermal shift assays (CETSA) were used to verify the key action targets. To detect the key pharmacophore of Pso, the interaction of Pso and its structural analogs with HSD17B2 was investigated by CETSA, HSD17B2 activity assay, and in-gel imaging determination. Target competitive test, virtual docking, mutated HSD17B2 activity, and CETSA assay were used to identify the binding site of Pso with HSD17B2. A mouse model of osteoporosis was established by ovariectomies, and the efficacy of Pso in vivo was confirmed by micro-CT, H&E staining, HSD17B2 activity, and bone-related biochemical assays. RESULTS: Pso regulated estrogen metabolism by targeting HSD17B2 in the liver, with the α, ß-unsaturated ester in Pso being the key pharmacophore. Pso significantly suppressed HSD17B2 activity by irreversibly binding to Lys236 of HSD17B2 and preventing NAD+ from entering the binding pocket. In vivo studies in ovariectomized mice revealed that Pso could inhibit HSD17B2 activity, prevent the inactivation of E2, increase levels of endogenous estrogen, improve bone metabolism-related indices, and play a role in anti-osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: Pso covalently binds to Lys236 of HSD17B2 in hepatocytes to prevent the inactivation of E2, thereby aiding in the treatment of osteoporosis.

Prognosis in early stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma treated with psoralen plus ultraviolet A irradiation and low-dose interferon-α: Long-term efficacy and survival according to conventional and emerging clinical endpoints.

Patients with early stage cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) usually have a benign and chronic disease course, characterized by temporally response to conventional skin directed therapies and intrinsic possibility to evolve. Using the combination of psoralen plus ultraviolet A irradiation (PUVA) and low-dose interferon-α (INF), the principal treatment goal is to keep confined the disease to the skin, preventing disease progression. Among 87 patients with early stage IA to IIA MF treated with low-dose IFN-α2b and PUVA in our center, complete remission (CR) were reported in 70 patients (80.5%) and the overall response rate (ORR) was 97.8% (n = 85), with a median time to best response to therapy of 5 months (range, 1-30). Among the responders, only the 8% of patients had a relapse with major event. The median follow-up was 207 months (range, 6-295). Survival data showed a median overall survival (OS) not reached (95% CI; 235-NR months), a disease free survival (DFS) of 210 months (95% CI; 200-226 months) and a median time to next treatment (TTNT) of 38.5 months (95% CI, 33-46 months). The long follow up of this study verifies our preliminary results already published in 2006 and confirms the efficacy of INF-PUVA combination therapy in a real world setting, according conventional (OS and DFS) and emerging (TTNT) clinical endpoint of treatment efficacy.

Effectiveness of narrowband UVB phototherapy and psoralen plus UVA photochemotherapy in the treatment of generalized lichen planus: Results from a large retrospective analysis and an update of the literature.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different phototherapeutic modalities in the treatment of cutaneous lichen planus (LP). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the chart data of 53 patients with generalized LP who had been subjected to narrowband UVB (NB-UVB) or photochemotherapy (PUVA) between January 1997 and April 2020. Of these, 30 patients had received NB-UVB, 18 patients oral PUVA and 5 patients bath PUVA. RESULTS: Fifty patients completed a full treatment course. The percentage of patients with a complete (>90% clearing) or good (51%-90% clearing) response was similar for NB-UVB versus PUVA (86.2% vs. 90.5%; P = 1.00). The number of exposures required for obtaining a complete or good response was also comparable for both treatment groups (NB-UVB: 28.9 ± 12.3 vs. PUVA: 25.4 ± 10.1; P = .209). Adverse events, in particular gastrointestinal upsets, were recorded in 26.1% of patients treated with oral PUVA while none were observed with NB-UVB. CONCLUSION: The therapeutic outcome and the number of treatments required for achieving a complete or good response were comparable for NB-UVB and PUVA; however, PUVA therapy was associated with a substantially higher rate of moderate adverse events.

Comparison of the efficacy of broad-band targeted UVB phototherapy and topical psoralen with targeted UVA phototherapy in localized vitiligo.

Aim of the study is to compare efficacy of targeted broad-band UVB phototherapy and topical psoralen with targeted UVA phototherapy treatments in localized vitiligo for 3 months prospectively. The cases with symmetrical vitiligo lesions were included in the study. Broad-band targeted UVB was applied on one side and targeted UVA phototherapy with topical psoralen on the other side. Twenty-two patients who were diagnosed with localized vitiligo were enrolled in this study. These cases consisted of 6 (27.3%) females and 16 (72.7%) males aging between 17 and 69 (34.22 ± 14.15). Fifty-four lesions (27 left, 27 right) were compared for treatments. After the first month of the treatments, the sides of the lesions were compared in order to evaluate improvement. Percentages of success were 25% for targeted broad-band UVB microphototherapy and 75% for topical psoralen with targeted UVA microphototherapy. When the two treatment methods were compared with each other, a significant difference was found in terms of treatment response (P = .017). At the end of the third month, the success rates were 37.5% for targeted broad-band UVB microphototherapy and 62.5% for topical psoralen with targeted UVA microphototherapy, however a statistically significant difference was not determined between the two treatments (P > .05). Both targeted broad-band UVB phototherapy and topical psoralen with targeted UVA phototherapy provided repigmentation for localized vitiligo at the end of the third month. Our investigation shows that both treatments are safe and they provide repigmentation with a limited response.

Indoor salt water baths followed by artificial ultraviolet B light for chronic plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic plaque psoriasis is an immune-mediated, chronic, inflammatory skin disease, which can impair quality of life and social interaction. Disease severity can be classified by the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score ranging from 0 to 72 points. Indoor artificial salt bath with or without artificial ultraviolet B (UVB) light is used to treat psoriasis, simulating sea bathing and sunlight exposure; however, the evidence base needs clear evaluation. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of indoor (artificial) salt water baths followed by exposure to artificial UVB for treating chronic plaque psoriasis in adults. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases up to June 2019: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS. We also searched five trial registers, and checked the reference lists of included studies, recent reviews, and relevant papers for further references to relevant trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of salt bath indoors followed by exposure to artificial UVB in adults who have been diagnosed with chronic plaque type psoriasis. We included studies reporting between-participant data and within-participant data. We evaluated two different comparisons: 1) salt bath + UVB versus other treatment without UVB; eligible comparators were exposure to psoralen bath, psoralen bath + artificial ultraviolet A UVA) light, topical treatment, systemic treatment, or placebo, and 2) salt bath + UVB versus other treatment + UVB or UVB only; eligible comparators were exposure to bath containing other compositions or concentrations + UVB or UVB only. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. The primary efficacy outcome was PASI-75, to detect people with a 75% or more reduction in PASI score from baseline. The primary adverse outcome was treatment-related adverse events requiring withdrawal. For the dichotomous variables PASI-75 and treatment-related adverse events requiring withdrawal, we estimated the proportion of events among the assessed participants. The secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life using the Dermatology Life Quality Index, (DLQI) pruritus severity measured using a visual analogue scale, time to relapse, and secondary malignancies. MAIN RESULTS: We included eight RCTs: six reported between-participant data (2035 participants; 1908 analysed), and two reported within-participant data (70 participants, 68 analysed; 140 limbs; 136 analysed). One study reported data for the comparison salt bath with UVB versus other treatment without UVB; and eight studies reported data for salt bath with UVB versus other treatment with UVB or UVB only. Of these eight studies, only five reported any of our pre-specified outcomes and assessed the comparison of salt bath with UVB versus UVB only. The one included trial that assessed salt bath plus UVB versus other treatment without UVB (psoralen bath + UVA) did not report any of our primary outcomes. The mean age of the participants ranged from 41 to 50 years of age in 75% of the studies. None of the included studies reported on the predefined secondary outcomes of this review. We judged seven of the eight studies as at high risk of bias in at least one domain, most commonly performance bias. Total trial duration ranged between at least two months and up to 13 months. In five studies, the median participant PASI score at baseline ranged from 15 to 18 and was balanced between treatment arms. Three studies did not report PASI score. Most studies were conducted in Germany; all were set in Europe. Half of the studies were multi-centred (set in spa centres or outpatient clinics); half were set in a single centre in either an unspecified settings, a psoriasis daycare centre, or a spa centre. Commercial spa or salt companies sponsored three of eight studies, health insurance companies funded another, the association of dermatologists funded another, and three did not report on funding. When comparing salt bath plus UVB versus UVB only, two between-participant studies found that salt bath plus UVB may improve psoriasis when measured using PASI 75 (achieving a 75% or more reduction in PASI score from baseline) (risk ratio (RR) 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24 to 2.35; 278 participants; low-certainty evidence). Assessment was conducted at the end of treatment, which was equivalent to six to eight weeks after start of treatment. The two trials which contributed data for the primary efficacy outcome were conducted by the same group, and did not blind outcome assessors. The German Spas Association funded one of the trials and the funding source was not stated for the other trial. Two other between-participant studies found salt bath plus UVB may make little to no difference to outcome treatment-related adverse events requiring withdrawal compared with UVB only (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.64; 404 participants; low-certainty evidence). One of the studies reported adverse events, but did not specify the type of events; the other study reported skin irritation. One within-participant study found similar results, with one participant reporting severe itch immediately after Dead Sea salt soak in the salt bath and UVB group and two instances of inadequate response to phototherapy and conversion to psoralen bath + UVA reported in the UVB only group (low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Salt bath with artificial ultraviolet B (UVB) light may improve psoriasis in people with chronic plaque psoriasis compared with UVB light treatment alone, and there may be no difference in the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events requiring withdrawal. Both results are based on data from a limited number of studies, which provided low-certainty evidence, so we cannot draw any clear conclusions. The reporting of our pre-specified outcomes was either non-existent or limited, with a maximum of two studies reporting a given outcome. The same group conducted the two trials which contributed data for the primary efficacy outcome, and the German Spas Association funded one of these trials. We recommend further RCTs that assess PASI-75, with detailed reporting of the outcome and time point, as well as treatment-related adverse events. Risk of bias was an issue; future studies should ensure blinding of outcome assessors and full reporting.

Psoralen and narrowband UVB combination provides higher efficacy in treating vitiligo compared with narrowband UVB alone: A randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Side effects of current treatments and the need for a safe treatment with higher efficiency necessitate seeking new treatment options for vitiligo. Few studies have investigated the combination of psoralen with narrowband ultraviolet B (NBUVB). In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of psoralen and NBUVB combination (P-NBUVB) with NBUVB alone in treatment of vitiligo. METHODS: This randomised clinical trial was carried out during 2015-2017 in dermatology clinics of Ghaem and Imam Reza hospitals, Mashhad, Iran on 40 vitiligo patients with 5-60% body involvement. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of NBUVB alone and P-NBUVB. Both groups underwent 60 phototherapy sessions (three sessions per week), and the repigmentation rate was measured using vitiligo area severity index (VASI) score. SPSS v. 16 software and appropriate statistical tests were used to analyse the data. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 33.9 ± 11.3 years. Twenty patients (50%) were females. The P-NBUVB group showed greater VASI improvement in lower extremities (P = 0.003) and overall (P = 0.026) compared with NBUVB group. Moreover, the treatment response appeared sooner in P-NUVB group. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, we can conclude that adding psoralen to NBUVB phototherapy can result in increased efficacy. However, more studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects and side effects of this treatment.

The Science and (Lost) Art of Psoralen Plus UVA Phototherapy.

PUVA phototherapy is the therapeutic use of psoralens and UVA light to treat inflammatory skin diseases, with psoriasis the prototype disease. Naturally occurring phototoxic compounds, psoralens interact with UVA to suppress DNA synthesis and cell proliferation and induce apoptosis of inflammatory cells. Well-developed therapeutic protocols for psoriasis guide psoralen and UVA doses, treatment frequency, and safety measures, and these protocols also may be used to treat other inflammatory dermatoses.

Psoralen inhibits malignant proliferation and induces apoptosis through triggering endoplasmic reticulum stress in human SMMC7721 hepatoma cells.

BACKGROUND: Psoralen is a coumarin-like and coumarin-related benzofuran glycoside, which is a commonly used traditional Chinese medicine to treat patients with kidney and spleen-yang deficiency symptom. Psoralen has been reported to show estrogen-like activity, antioxidant activity, osteoblastic proliferation accelerating activity, antitumor effects and antibacterial activity. However, the antitumor mechanism of psoralen is not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of psoralen in human hepatoma cell line SMMC7721 and the mechanism of antitumor effects. RESULTS: Psoralen inhibited proliferation of SMMC7721 in a dose- and time-dependent manner, and promoted apoptosis. Further, psoralen activated the ER stress signal pathway, including the expansion of endoplasmic reticulum, increasing the mRNA levels of GRP78, DDIT3, ATF4, XBP1, GADD34 and the protein levels of GDF15, GRP78, IRE1α, XBP-1s in a time-dependent manner. Psoralen induces cell cycle arrest at G1 phase by enhancing CyclinD1 and reducing CyclinE1 expression. Moreover, TUDC couldn't inhibit the psoralen-induced ER stress in SMMC7721 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Psoralen can inhibit the proliferation of SMMC7721 cells and induce ER stress response to induce cell apoptosis, suggesting that psoralen may represent a novel therapeutic option for the prevention and treatment hepatocellular carcinoma.

Psoralen inhibits malignant proliferation and induces apoptosis through triggering endoplasmic reticulum stress in human SMMC7721 hepatoma cells

BACKGROUND: Psoralen is a coumarin-like and coumarin-related benzofuran glycoside, which is a commonly used traditional Chinese medicine to treat patients with kidney and spleen-yang deficiency symptom. Psoralen has been reported to show estrogen-like activity, antioxidant activity, osteoblastic proliferation accelerating activity, antitumor effects and antibacterial activity. However, the antitumor mechanism of psoralen is not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of psoralen in human hepatoma cell line SMMC7721 and the mechanism of antitumor effects. RESULTS: Psoralen inhibited proliferation of SMMC7721 in a dose- and time-dependent manner, and promoted apoptosis. Further, psoralen activated the ER stress signal pathway, including the expansion of endoplasmic reticulum, increasing the mRNA levels of GRP78, DDIT3, ATF4, XBP1, GADD34 and the protein levels of GDF15, GRP78, IRE1α, XBP-1s in a time-dependent manner. Psoralen induces cell cycle arrest at G1 phase by enhancing CyclinD1 and reducing CyclinE1 expression. Moreover, TUDC couldn't inhibit the psoralen-induced ER stress in SMMC7721 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Psoralen can inhibit the proliferation of SMMC7721 cells and induce ER stress response to induce cell apoptosis, suggesting that psoralen may represent a novel therapeutic option for the prevention and treatment hepatocellular carcinoma.

Comparing ultraviolet light A photo(chemo)therapy with Methotrexate protocol in childhood localized scleroderma: Evidence from systematic review and meta-analysis approach.

OBJECTIVE: Localized scleroderma is a skin fibrosing disorder that, if untreated, may result in severe disability. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the present evidence concerning the effectiveness of Methotrexate versus phototherapy, alone or associated with Psoralen, in childhood localized scleroderma. METHOD: A systematic search between January 1996 and May 2017 was performed to identify studies investigating the efficacy of Methotrexate (MTX) or phototherapy (UVA) for treating localized scleroderma with onset ≤18 years. Due to a lack of validated clinical criteria, four clinical response criteria were used to assess the treatment efficacy as primary outcome. We determined a combined estimate of the proportion of children responding to MTX and UVA. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies was included (8 MTX; 11 UVA). In the methotrexate group, 193 children were included in the analysis; in the phototherapy group, a total of 48 treated children. For both groups age, disease subtype, glucocorticoids (GCs) use, and side effects of treatment were also analyzed. The meta-analysis suggested that UVA and MTX protocols have both a favorable effect in active lesions of childhood localized scleroderma. However, MTX resulted significantly superior to UVA, with or without Psoralen. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the combination of MTX and GCs in patients with a high risk of complication. Phototherapy with UVA1 could represent a therapeutic option in patients with limited scleroderma, where lesions do not cross joints and they do not lead to potential cosmetic changes.

Enhancing Radiation Therapy Through Cherenkov Light-Activated Phototherapy.

PURPOSE: This work investigates a new approach to enhance radiotherapy through a photo therapeutic agent activated by Cherenkov light produced from the megavoltage photon beam. The process is termed Radiotherapy Enhanced with Cherenkov photo-Activation (RECA). RECA is compatible with various photo-therapeutics, but here we focus on use with psoralen, an ultraviolet activated therapeutic with extensive history of application in superficial and extracorporeal settings. RECA has potential to extend the scope of psoralen treatments beyond superficial to deep seated lesions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In vitro studies in B16 melanoma and 4T1 murine breast cancer cells were performed to investigate the potential of RT plus RECA versus RT alone for increasing cytotoxicity (local control) and increasing surface expression of major histocompatibility complex I (MHC I). The latter represents potential for immune response amplification (increased antigen presentation), which has been observed in other psoralen therapies. Cytotoxicity assays included luminescence and clonogenics. The MHC I assays were performed using flow cytometry. In addition, Cherenkov light intensity measurements were performed to investigate the possibility of increasing the Cherenkov light intensity per unit dose from clinical megavoltage beams, to maximize psoralen activation. RESULTS: Luminescence assays showed that RECA treatment (2 Gy at 6 MV) increased cytotoxicity by up to 20% and 9.5% for 4T1 and B16 cells, respectively, compared with radiation and psoralen alone (ie, Cherenkov light was blocked). Similarly, flow cytometry revealed median MHC I expression was significantly higher in RECA-treated cells, compared with those receiving radiation and psoralen alone (approximately 450% and 250% at 3 Gy and 6 Gy, respectively, P << .0001). Clonogenic assays of B16 cells at doses of 6 Gy and 12 Gy showed decreases in tumor cell viability of 7% (P = .017) and 36% (P = .006), respectively, when Cherenkov was present. CONCLUSION: This work demonstrates for the first time the potential for photo-activation of psoralen directly in situ, from Cherenkov light generated by a clinical megavoltage treatment beam.

Phototherapy using narrowband ultraviolet B and psoralen plus ultraviolet A is beneficial in steroid-dependent antihistamine-refractory chronic urticaria: a randomized, prospective observer-blinded comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Literature on the efficacy of phototherapy in steroid-dependent antihistamine-refractory chronic urticaria (CRU) is limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare the efficacy of psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) and narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) in steroid-dependent CRU. METHODS: In this randomized, prospective observer-blinded comparative study, 50 patients with steroid-dependent CRU (6 months of spontaneous urticaria with no response after 3 consecutive months of antihistamines and steroid dependence) were administered either PUVA (group A) or NB-UVB (group B) for 90 days, with a post-treatment follow-up of 90 days. The treatment efficacy was assessed using the average urticaria activity score 7 (aUAS7) and outcome scoring scale (OSS) every 2 weeks. RESULTS: The mean values of aUAS7 progressively decreased from 4·9 ± 0·8 and 5·0 ± 0·7 at baseline to 1·9 ± 0·7 and 1·4 ± 0·7 in groups A and B, respectively, by day 90. This further decreased to 1·5 ± 0·8 and 1·4 ± 1·0 at day 180 in both groups. The values of OSS progressively increased from baseline (1·6 ± 0·5 in group A and 1·3 ± 0·5 in group B) to 3·9 ± 0·3 and 4·0 ± 0·3 in groups A and B, respectively, by day 90, and 3·9 ± 0·5 and 4·0 ± 0·6 by day 180. NB-UVB fared statistically better than PUVA at different time points. Adverse events encountered were minimal and did not warrant treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Phototherapy, especially NB-UVB, is an effective, safe and affordable therapeutic modality for steroid-dependent CRU and should be tried prior to third-line treatment options such as omalizumab, ciclosporin and other immunosuppressants.

How I treat mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma variant and is closely related to a rare leukemic variant, Sézary syndrome (SS). MF patients at risk of disease progression can now be identified and an international consortium has been established to address the prognostic relevance of specific biologic factors and define a prognostic index. There are a lack of randomized clinical trial data in MF/SS and evidence is based on a traditional "stage-based" approach; treatment of early-stage disease (IA-IIA) involves skin directed therapies which include topical corticosteroids, phototherapy (psoralen with UVA or UVB), topical chemotherapy, topical bexarotene, and radiotherapy including total skin electron beam therapy. Systemic approaches are used for refractory early-stage and advanced-stage disease (IIB-IV) and include bexarotene, interferon α, extracorporeal photopheresis, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and antibody therapies such as alemtuzumab, systemic chemotherapy, and allogeneic transplantation. However, despite the number of biologic agents available, the treatment of advanced-stage disease still represents an unmet medical need with short duration of responses. Encouragingly, randomized phase 3 trials are assessing novel agents, including brentuximab vedotin and the anti-CCR4 antibody, mogamulizumab. A broader understanding of the biology of MF/SS will hopefully identify more effective targeted therapies.

Treatments for Cutaneous Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous lichen planus (CLP) is an inflammatory dermatosis. Its chronic relapsing course and frequently spontaneous regression hamper the assessment of treatment effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of available treatment modalities for CLP. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov registry. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the current literature. All randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized case-control studies, and cohort studies with more than one treatment arm were included. The primary outcomes were complete response and time to complete response. The secondary outcomes were partial response, relapse, time to relapse, reduction of itch, the adverse event rate, and withdrawal due to adverse events. DATA SYNTHESIS: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 11 were randomized controlled trials. Most trials had a small sample size. In the rare studies in which variants other than generalized or classic lichen planus were included, they could not be analyzed separately. Body-of-evidence quality ranged from very low to moderate. Acitretin, sulfasalazine, and griseofulvin were associated with increased overall response rates in comparison with placebo. Narrow-band ultraviolet B radiation (NBUVB) was more effective than 6 weeks' low-dose prednisolone in achieving a complete response, and prednisolone was more effective than enoxaparin. Hydroxychloroquine was more effective than griseofulvin in achieving an overall response. Betamethasone valerate 0.1% ointment had comparable efficacy to calcipotriol ointment. Methotrexate was effective, with a nonsignificant difference in the complete response rate in comparison with oral betamethasone. In nonrandomized controlled trials, oral psoralen plus ultraviolet A photochemotherapy (PUVA) had comparable efficacy to a PUVA bath and NBUVB. Psoralen plus sunlight exposure (PUVASOL) and betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% cream were effective relative to a short course of oral metronidazole. CONCLUSIONS: Several effective treatment options are available for CLP. Further well-designed studies are warranted to investigate the efficacy of topical glucocorticoids-the current first-line therapy-as well as other treatment modalities, and the treatment of different variants of CLP.

The role of phototherapy in cutaneous chronic graft-vs-host disease: a retrospective study and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Cutaneous chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Phototherapy is a therapeutic option for patients with skin involvement and for those who require high doses of corticosteroids. We analyze the cases treated in our department and review the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients with GVHD treated with phototherapy in the dermatology department of Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe in Valencia, Spain between March 2011 and October 2014 were identified. Data were gathered retrospectively. RESULTS: There were 16 patients: 10 treated with psoralen-UV-A and 6 with narrowband-UV-B. Complete response was achieved in 9 patients and partial response in 7; 2 patients with partial responses relapsed after treatment. Ten patients were able to decrease their dose of corticosteroids during treatment, and a further 3 decreased the number of other immunosuppressant drugs. No serious adverse effects occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Phototherapy is a good therapeutic option for patients with chronic GVHD with extensive cutaneous involvement, as well as for those who fail to respond to topical treatment or who have become steroid-dependent. The main benefits are that, as the treatment targets the skin, it reduces corticosteroid requirements and has a good safety profile. Treatment must be individualized and, in our experience, both the initial dose and the maximum dose per session can be lower than for other diseases.

[Efficacy and safety of topical PUVA treatment for refractory lesions of mycosis fungoides].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical PUVA treatment of refractory lesions of mycosis fungoides. METHODS: From January 2008 to 2014, a total of 10 patients (4 males and 6 females) with mycosis fungoides were treated with topical PUVA in Peking Union Medical College Hospital, including 7 cases in plaque stage and 3 cases in tumor stage. The average number of lesions were 1.9±0.9. The median age of these patients was (46.0±9.4) years. The average course of disease was (12.4±7.7) years. Psoralen was applied topically on treatment area 30 min before total body UVA irradiation treatment, 3 times a week. And the efficiency and safety of the therapy were evaluated. RESULTS: All the patients were treated with topical PUVA with a median total dose of (161.60±135.96) J/cm2 in an average of (18.10±14.61) fractions. Total dose of UVA was (1 953.25±829.73) J/cm2, and total number of treatment was (261.90±116.79) fractions. The total treatment time was (45.80±26.64) months. Complete clinical response (CR) rate was 60.0%, partial response (PR) rate was 30.0%, and the overall response rate (CR+PR) was 90.0%. One patient showed no response. No severe acute or chronic side effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Topical PUVA therapy is effective in the treatment of refractory lesions of mycosis fungoides with little severe side effects.