The impact of policy interventions to promote the uptake of biosimilar medicines in Belgium: a nationwide interrupted time series analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Belgian government has taken several measures to increase the uptake of biosimilars in past years. However, no formal evaluation of the impact of these measures has been made yet. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the implemented measures on biosimilar uptake. METHODS: An interrupted time series analysis was performed using an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model with the Box-Jenkins method. All data were expressed as defined daily doses (DDD) per month/quarter and obtained from the Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI). Three molecules were included in the analysis: etanercept (ambulatory), filgrastim (hospital), and epoetin (hospital). A significance level of 5% was used for all analyses. RESULTS: In the ambulatory care, the effect of a financial prescriber incentive of 2019 was investigated. After this intervention, 44.504 (95% CI -61.61 to -14.812; P < 0.001) fewer etanercept biosimilar DDDs were dispensed monthly than expected in the absence of the intervention. Two interventions were modelled for biosimilars in the hospital setting. The first intervention of 2016 includes prescription targets for biosimilars and monitoring of hospitals on adequate tendering. The second intervention involves an information campaign on biosimilars. After the first intervention, a small decrease in quarterly epoetin biosimilar uptake of 449.820 DDD (95% CI -880.113 to -19.527; P = 0.05) was observed. The second intervention led to a larger increase in quarterly epoetin biosimilar uptake of 2733.692 DDD (95% CI 1648.648-3818.736; P < 0.001). For filgrastim, 1809.833 DDD (95% CI 1354.797-2264.869; P < 0.001) more biosimilars were dispensed immediately after the first intervention and 151.639 DDD (95% CI -203.128 to -100.150; P < 0.001) fewer biosimilars each quarter after the first intervention. An immediate and sustained increase of 700.932 DDD (95% CI 180.536-1221.328; P = 0.016) in quarterly biosimilar volume was observed after the second intervention. All other parameter estimates were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the impact of past policy interventions to increase the uptake of biosimilars has been variable and limited. A holistic policy framework is required to develop a competitive and sustainable off-patent biologicals market in Belgium.

Cost comparison of filgrastim versus pegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim biosimilars for inpatient prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia.

INTRODUCTION: The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center (The James) uses daily subcutaneous filgrastim as the inpatient granulocyte colony-stimulating factor of choice. The coordination of care associated with filgrastim can often be a barrier to patient discharge. The purpose of this study was to compare the inpatient cost of daily filgrastim to single dose pegfilgrastim and biosimilars. METHODS: Adult patients admitted to The James who received at least one dose of filgrastim between June 1, 2021 and August 31, 2021 were retrospectively identified. This study compared the inpatient cost of filgrastim and biosimilars associated with one chemotherapy cycle to the potential inpatient cost of pegfilgrastim and biosimilars based on average sales price (ASP). Additionally, the number and duration of discharge prescriptions for filgrastim was determined. RESULTS: Of the 44 unique patient encounters that met inclusion criteria, 19 received 300-mcg doses of filgrastim and 25 received 480-mcg doses. The median number of doses administered per admission was eight. If each of these patients were to instead receive the most inexpensive biosimilar, pegfilgrastim reference product, the cost would be 216% higher than with filgrastim-sndz. At discharge, 15 patients (34%) received a prescription for filgrastim to be continued for a median duration of 6 days. CONCLUSION: Based on ASP, pegfilgrastim was more costly than filgrastim. Potential rebates and negotiation power may alter the financial outlook of adding pegfilgrastim to inpatient formulary. Exploration of delays in discharge due to insurance coordination for filgrastim continuation in the outpatient setting may also impact formulary decisions.

Single-Center Analysis of Pegfilgrastim-induced Aortitis Using a Drug Prescription Database and CT Findings.

Background Pegfilgrastim-induced aortitis is a rare but serious adverse event in patients undergoing anticancer therapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor analogs. Despite previous case series and systemic reviews, the exact incidence, clinical presentation, and CT manifestations of pegfilgrastim-induced aortitis remain unclear. Purpose To clarify the incidence and clinicoradiologic characteristics of pegfilgrastim-induced aortitis. Materials and Methods Pegfilgrastim administration records from January 2015 to March 2021 were retrospectively collected from the drug prescription database of a single center and were matched with the relevant findings in the CT database. Corresponding CT images within 6 months were available for a total of 1462 doses of pegfilgrastim in 674 patients. Four radiologists reviewed the CT images for the presence of aortitis in two steps. Clinical information and the distribution of aortitis on CT images were examined for patients with a diagnosis of pegfilgrastim-induced aortitis. Results Pegfilgrastim-induced aortitis was observed in 18 of 674 patients (mean age, 62 years ± 13 [SD]; 424 men), resulting in incidence rates of 2.7% per patient (95% CI: 1.6, 4.2) and 1.2% per dose (95% CI: 0.7, 1.9). The most common original primary malignancies were esophageal cancer (n = 10, 9%), breast cancer (n = 3, 4%), and pancreatic cancer (n = 2, 2%). The most common anticancer drugs used at onset were 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and docetaxel. Seven cases were symptomatic, while the remaining 11 (61%) were asymptomatic. CT findings indicated that aortitis involved branches of the aortic arch in 13 cases (72%), aortic arch in 10 cases (56%), and abdominal aorta in two cases (11%). Conclusion Pegfilgrastim-induced aortitis may be more prevalent than previously reported and may be more common in patients with esophageal cancer and those who received 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and docetaxel as anticancer drugs. The findings also suggest that pegfilgrastim-induced aortitis is often characterized by aortic arch and proximal branch involvement at CT. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Krinsky in this issue.

Impact of pegfilgrastim approval on relative dose intensity and outcomes of R-CHOP for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

ABSTRACT: Maintaining relative dose intensity (RDI) of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) improves the prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Pegfilgrastim was approved in Japan in November 2014 to prevent febrile neutropenia (FN) and maintain RDI.In this retrospective study, we reviewed 334 patients with DLBCL who received 6 or more courses of R-CHOP and analyzed the differences in the RDI, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival between patients whose treatment started after November 2014 (postapproval group) and those whose treatment started before October 2014 (pre-approval group).The incidence of FN was lower (20% vs 38.3%, P < .001) and the RDI of R-CHOP was higher (86.8% vs 67.8%, P < .001) in the postapproval group. Pegfilgrastim was administered to many of these patients (76.8%) and was thought to have contributed to the high RDI maintenance in the postapproval group. Interrupted time-series analysis showed a significant rise of the RDI at the timing of pegfilgrastim approval in patients aged <70 years (estimated change: 18.1%, P < .001). The 5-year OS (85.7% vs 69.9%, P = .009) and progression-free survival (81.4% vs 64.4%, P = .011) were superior in the postapproval group. However, the differences were not significant in matched-pair analysis matching National Comprehensive Cancer Network-International Prognostic Index scores. Improved survival outcomes in this group were observed only among patients with Ann Arbor stage 3/4 (5-year OS: 83.7% vs 61.3%, P = .019) and high-risk on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-International Prognostic Index (5-year OS: 80.7% vs 32.4%, P = .014). Multivariate analysis showed that a high RDI and low lactate dehydrogenase were associated with superior OS (RDI ≥ 85%, hazard ratio: 0.48, P = .016; lactate dehydrogenase > institutional upper limit of normal, hazard ratio: 2.38, P = .005).The RDI of R-CHOP was able to be maintained at higher levels, the incidence of FN was lower, and significantly better clinical outcomes were achieved in clinically high-risk groups after pegfilgrastim approval. Maintaining a high RDI in R-CHOP by administering pegfilgrastim to those who are likely to have low RDI without it is important for achieving favorable outcomes in patients with DLBCL.

Switching from Biologic to Biosimilar Products: Insight from an Integrated Health Care System.

Biologics are indicated for the treatment of a wide range of conditions and have transformed care in several therapeutic areas; however, they are expensive for both health care systems and patients. The use of biosimilars, which are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as being "highly similar" to the originator biologic, has the potential to change the health care landscape in the biologic space through considerable cost savings for both payors and patients. With the introduction of biosimilars, organizations are increasingly evaluating how to switch patients from originator biologics to biosimilars. While published studies have evaluated the outcomes of patients switched from originator biologics to biosimilars, there are few publications describing the process health care systems have used to adopt and switch patients to biosimilars. Since 2016, Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) has undertaken several biosimilar switches starting with the first biosimilar introduced to the market, filgrastim, and has been able to successfully switch 91.8% of patients receiving infliximab, 99.8% receiving rituximab, and 100% receiving filgrastim, trastuzumab, and bevacizumab originator biologics to their respective biosimilars. In an effort to support other health care systems and provide a framework for implementing biosimilar switches, the purpose of this paper is to describe the biosimilar switch model and share learnings from the KPCO experience.

Prophylactic pegfilgrastim to prevent febrile neutropenia among patients receiving biweekly (Q2W) chemotherapy regimens: a systematic review of efficacy, effectiveness and safety.

BACKGROUND: Pegfilgrastim, a long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), is commonly used to prevent febrile neutropenia (FN), a potentially life-threatening complication, following myelosuppressive chemotherapy. The FDA label for pegfilgrastim specifies that it should not be administered 14 days before or within 24 h of administration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, precluding the use of pegfilgrastim in biweekly (Q2W) regimens. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer guidelines support the use of prophylactic pegfilgrastim in patients receiving Q2W regimens. The objective of this study was to systematically review evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies that describe the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic pegfilgrastim in preventing FN among patients receiving Q2W regimens. METHODS: An Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library literature search was conducted to evaluate the evidence regarding efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of prophylactic pegfilgrastim versus no prophylactic pegfilgrastim or prophylaxis with other G-CSF in patients who were receiving Q2W chemotherapy regimens with high (> 20%) or intermediate (10-20%) risk of FN for a non-myeloid malignancy. Studies that addressed absolute or relative risk of FN, grade 1-4 neutropenia, all-cause or any hospitalization, dose delays or dose reductions, adverse events, or mortality were included. Studies where the comparator was a Q3W chemotherapy regimen with primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim were also included. RESULTS: The initial literature search identified 2258 publications. Thirteen publications met the eligibility criteria, including eight retrospective, one prospective, one phase 1 dose escalation study, and three RCTs. In nine of the 13 studies reporting incidence of FN, and in seven of the nine studies reporting incidence of neutropenia, administration of prophylactic pegfilgrastim in patients receiving Q2W regimens resulted in decreased or comparable rates of FN or neutropenia compared with patients receiving filgrastim, no G-CSF, lipefilgrastim or pegfilgrastim in Q3W regimens. In six of the nine studies reporting safety data, lower or comparable safety profiles were observed between pegfilgrastim and comparators. CONCLUSIONS: In a variety of non-myeloid malignancies, administration of prophylactic pegfilgrastim was efficacious in reducing the risk of FN in patients receiving high- or intermediate-risk Q2W regimens, with an acceptable safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no: CRD42019155572 .

Efficacy and safety of oral magnesium supplementation in reducing febrile neutropenia episodes in children with solid tumors treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy: randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Hypomagnesemia has been associated with febrile neutropenia (FN) in pediatric patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CDDPBC). The primary aim was to determine whether oral magnesium supplementation reduces FN episodes in pediatric patients with solid tumors treated with CDDPBC. METHOD: This randomized clinical trial, with open-label, single-center, parallel group and superiority design was conducted in Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez at Mexico City. Children ≥ 9 years with solid tumors that were to receive a CDDPBC cycle were invited to participate. Each chemotherapy cycle with CDDPBC was randomly assigned to receive oral magnesium supplementation (250 mg/day) or not receive magnesium supplementation (control group). Efficacy was determined by relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) as well as with numbers needed to treat (NNT). Active surveillance was conducted to assess safety in both groups. Analyses were carried out by intention to treat. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03449693. RESULTS: One hundred and one chemotherapy cycles with CDDPBC were analyzed (50 in the magnesium supplement arm and 51 in control group). Baseline clinical characteristics were similar comparing both groups. Oral magnesium supplementation reduces FN episodes compared to control group [RR 0.53, (95% CI 0.32-0.89), NNT = 4]. In the supplemented group, patients had fewer episodes of septic shock secondary to FN [RR 0.43, (95% CI 0.02-0.94), NNT = 6] and FN appeared on average 5 days later (p = 0.031). Hypomagnesemia episodes and adverse events were similar across both groups. CONCLUSION: Oral supplementation with magnesium reduces FN episodes neutropenia in pediatric patients with solid tumors treated with CDDPBC.

Carboplatin and Paclitaxel for Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Final Overall Survival and Adverse Event Analysis of a Phase III Trial (NRG Oncology/GOG0209).

PURPOSE: Limitations of the paclitaxel-doxorubicin-cisplatin (TAP) regimen in the treatment of endometrial cancer include tolerability and cumbersome scheduling. The Gynecologic Oncology Group studied carboplatin plus paclitaxel (TC) as a noninferior alternative to TAP. METHODS: GOG0209 was a phase III, randomized, noninferiority, open-label trial. Inclusion criteria were stage III, stage IV, and recurrent endometrial cancers; performance status 0-2; and adequate renal, hepatic, and marrow function. Prior radiotherapy and/or hormonal therapy were permitted, but chemotherapy, including radiosensitization, was not. Patients were treated with doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 (day 1), followed by paclitaxel 160 mg/m2 (day 2) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the curve 6 (day 1) every 21 days for seven cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS; modified intention to treat). Progression-free survival (PFS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and toxicity were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2009, 1,381 women were enrolled. Noninferiority of TC to TAP was concluded for OS (median, 37 v 41 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 1.002; 90% CI, 0.9 to 1.12), and PFS (median, 13 v 14 months; HR, 1.032; 90% CI, 0.93 to 1.15). Neutropenic fever was reported in 7% of patients receiving TAP and 6% of those receiving TC. Grade > 2 sensory neuropathy was recorded in 26% of patients receiving TAP and 20% receiving TC (P = .40). More grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia (23% v 12%), vomiting (7% v 4%), diarrhea (6% v 2%), and metabolic (14% v 8%) toxicities were reported with TAP. Neutropenia (52% v 80%) was more common with TC. Small HRQoL differences favored TC. CONCLUSION: With demonstrated noninferiority to TAP, TC is the global first-line standard for advanced endometrial cancer.

Intrauterine G-CSF Administration in Recurrent Implantation Failure (RIF): An Rct.

This study investigates the effects of intrauterine G-CSF on endometrial thickness, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate in a recurrent implantation failure (RIF) group with normal endometrium. This study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial with the involvement of 157 RIF group pati; ents. The RIF group was formed on the basis of the RIF criteria: "The failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after the transfer of at least four good-quality embryos in a minimum of three fresh or frozen cycles to a woman under the age of 40 years. The study sample included 82 patients in the G-CSF group who received G-CSF once a day on hCG. The procedure was performed by administering 30 mIU of Leucostim®(Filgrastim [G-CSF] 30 mIU/mL; DEM Medical, Dong-A; South Korea) through slow infusion into the endometrial cavity using a soft embryo transfer catheter. Normal saline of 1 mL was infused into the endometrial cavity in the same way in 75 patients in the control group. The standard ICSI procedure was used for all patients, and fresh cycle embryos were transferred on the third or fifth day. No statistically significant difference was identified in clinical pregnancy rates, miscarriage rates and live birth rates between the G-CSF group and the control group (p = 0.112, p = 0.171, p = 0.644, respectively), and no difference was observed between the two groups regarding endometrial thickness (p = 0.965). The intervention of administration G-CSF into the uterine cavity in RIF patients with normal endometrium, did not alter the endometrial thickness, clinical pregnancy rates, or live birth rates.

Prediction of Survival Benefit of Filgrastim in Adult and Pediatric Patients With Acute Radiation Syndrome.

Acute exposure to high doses of radiation leads to severe myelosuppression, but few treatments are currently available to treat hematopoietic syndrome of acute radiation syndrome. Granulocyte colony stimulating factors (e.g., filgrastim) stimulate proliferation of neutrophil precursors and enhance mature neutrophil function. Owing to ethical constraints on conducting clinical research in lethally irradiated humans, we developed a model-based strategy to integrate preclinical experience in irradiated nonhuman primates (NHPs) and other clinical myelosuppressive conditions to inform filgrastim dosing to treat hematopoietic syndrome of acute radiation syndrome. Models predicting neutrophil counts and overall survival based on drug exposures were calibrated and scaled from NHPs to adult and pediatric human subjects. Several scenarios were examined investigating variations in filgrastim doses, dose frequency, treatment initiation, and duration, as well as the effect of age and radiation dose rate. Model-based simulations and established safety profiles supported that a subcutaneous filgrastim dose of 10 µg/kg once daily provides a significant survival benefit (50%) over placebo in both adults and children, provided that the treatment is initiated within 1-14 days after radiation exposure and lasts 2-3 weeks. For treatment durations of longer than 3 weeks, filgrastim treatment is not expected to provide significantly greater benefit. This survival benefit is expected to hold for the wide range of radiation doses and dose rates (0.01-1,000 Gy/hours) examined.

Impact of Primary Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis on Relative Dose Intensity in Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant FEC-100 Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed was to clarify the impact of pegfilgrastim (PEG) 3.6 mg primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia (FN) on the average relative dose intensity (ARDI) of neoadjuvant/adjuvant FEC-100 for breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-centre cohort study including 296 patients who received FEC-100 compared PEG and non-PEG groups. The PEG group received PEG 3.6 mg as a single subcutaneous injection in each study cycle. The primary endpoint was the ARDI of FEC-100. The secondary endpoints were patient percentage of ARDI≥85%, factors associated with ARDI≥85%, and reasons for reduced ARDI. RESULTS: The PEG group showed significantly higher mean ARDI (95.6% versus 90.7%, p<0.001) and patient percentage of ARDI≥85% (93.0% versus 79.9%, p=0.001). PEG was significantly associated with ARDI≥85% (p=0.009). Neutropenia and FN, the main reasons for reduced ARDI, were significantly lower in the PEG group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Primary PEG 3.6 mg prophylaxis increased the ARDI of FEC-100.

Hematopoietic effects of Azadirachta indica methanolic extract in cyclophosphamide mediated myelosuppressed albino rat.

Myelosuppression or bone marrow suppression is one of the most common side effects caused by anti-cancer drugs. Certain nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antibiotics and viruses like B19 virus can also cause bone marrow suppression resulting in serious consequences like leukopenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia. Currently, it is mainly treated by Filgrastim, use of which is not without side effects. Certain natural drugs can be a safer alternative to treat myelosuppression. Azadirachta indica, commonly known as Neem, is an important medicinal plant of subcontinent. Keeping in view the traditional uses of Neem, present study aims to investigate its potential role in reversing myelosuppression. Albino rats were used to determine hematopoietic activity of Neem leaves after inducing myelosuppression by cyclophosphamide given subcutaneously. Filgrastim was used as reference standard to compare the antimyelosuppressant activity of the drug. The drug was evaluated in three doses i.e. 50mg/kg, 100mg/kg and 200mg/kg body weight, while blood samples were drawn on 0, 1st, 7th, 14th and 21st day. The drug was found to be effective in reversing bone marrow suppression in all three doses based on the hematological parameters (mean WBC, RBC, platelets, Hb, Hct etc.) which improved significantly. The results suggest that the drug can be used as antimyelosuppressant after establishing its safety and identifying its active constituents with their mechanism of action.

Appropriateness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients receiving chemotherapy by febrile neutropenia risk level.

OBJECTIVE: Inappropriate granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use with myelosuppressive chemotherapy has been reported. Using the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records electronic medical record database, prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (pegfilgrastim/filgrastim) use in cancer patients was assessed by febrile neutropenia risk level. METHODS: Patients with nonmetastatic or metastatic breast, head/neck, colorectal, ovarian/gynecologic, lung cancer, or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy from June 2013 to May 2014 were included. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use with high-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk chemotherapy and distribution of National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk factors with intermediate-risk regimens were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 86,189 patients received ∼4.2 million chemotherapy cycles (high risk, 9%; intermediate risk, 48%; low risk, 43%). Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given in 24% of cycles (high risk, 59%; intermediate risk, 29%; low risk, 11%). For nonmetastatic solid tumors, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given in 78% (high risk), 31% (intermediate risk), and 6% (low risk) of cycles. For metastatic solid tumors or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given in 50% (high risk), 27% (intermediate risk), and 11% (low risk) of cycles. Among patients receiving intermediate-risk regimens with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, febrile neutropenia risk factors were identified in 56% (95% confidence interval, 51.1-60.9%) of patients with nonmetastatic solid tumors (n = 400) and in 70% (64.5-73.5%) of patients with metastatic solid tumors or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 400). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use was appropriately highest for high-risk regimens and lowest for low-risk regimens yet still potentially underused in high risk regimens, overused in low-risk regimens, and not appropriately targeted in intermediate-risk regimens, indicating a need for further education on febrile neutropenia risk evaluation and appropriate granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use.

Modification of the Myelotoxic and Antitumor Effects of Polychemotherapy by Polysaccharides from Tussilago farfara L.

The experiments on C57Bl/6 mice with Lewis lung carcinoma showed that addition of Tussilago farfara L. polysaccharides to conventional cisplatin/paclitaxel polychemotherapy moderated neutropenia caused by antitumor therapy and increased its efficiency. The stimulating effect of polysaccharides on the granulopoietic lineage cells is comparable with that of recombinant CSF Neupogen.

Efficacy and Safety of Bi-weekly Pegfilgrastim for Dose-dense Chemotherapy-induced Neutropenia in Breast Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC) for patients with HER-2-negative breast cancer is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline in US. However, there are little data on serum G-CSF concentrations in patients undergoing bi-weekly dose-dense therapy with pegfilgrastim. The objective of this study was to compare the serum G-CSF concentrations in patients receiving pegfilgrastim in bi- or tri-weekly regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 26 patients who received ddAC or docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) for primary breast cancer. Serum G-CSF concentrations were measured by ELISA. RESULTS: Serum G-CSF concentrations peaked in the second week of ddAC cases and in the ninth week of TC cases. Neutrophils gradually increased until the sixth week in ddAC cases, while they were slightly decreased during the first three weeks in TC cases. Treatments were completed without febrile neutropenia or treatment delays. CONCLUSION: Primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim administrations increased serum G-CSF concentrations, helping to maintain the absolute neutrophil counts that are required to undergo chemotherapy. The treatment of ddAC with 3.6 mg pegfilgrastim is completely safe for female Japanese patients.

Automated red blood cell exchange in preparation for filgrastim mobilization of autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cells in a patient with sickle cell anemia.

Increasing survival of patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA) well into adulthood results in a rising likelihood of developing hematological malignancy. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) rescue is standard of care for several hematological malignancies, but the risk of severe or life-threatening vaso-occlusive phenomena during filgrastim mobilization of HPC for collection poses a potential barrier to this approach. We report the use of automated red cell exchange in preparation for filgrastim mobilization in a patient with homozygous SCA. Red cell exchange was repeated just prior to high-dose chemotherapy to mitigate the need for red cell transfusion during bone marrow reconstitution. The patient experienced no vaso-occlusive phenomena throughout the entire episode of care and did not become iron overloaded. This approach should be considered for all patients with homozygous or compound heterozygous sickle cell disease who are candidates for auto-HPC rescue therapy.

Primary systemic therapy in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using mFOLFIRINOX: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgery followed by gemcitabine and/or a fluoropyrimidine is standard therapy for resectable PDAC. mFOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 , irinotecan 180 mg/m2 , leucovorin 400 mg/m2 Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 × 48 h IV, peg-filgrastim 6 mg SQ day 3, every 14 days) has substantial activity in metastatic PDAC. We wished to determine the tolerability/efficacy of peri-operative mFOLFIRINOX in resectable PDAC. METHODS: Patients with resectable PDAC (ECOG PS 0/1) received four cycles of mFOLFIRINOX pre- and post-surgery. The primary endpoint was completion of preoperative chemotherapy plus resection. Secondary endpoints included completion of all therapy, R0 resection, treatment related toxicity, PFS, and OS. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients enrolled: median age 62 (47-78); 20/21 (95%) completed four cycles of preoperative mFOLFIRINOX; response by RECIST was 1 CR, 3 PR, 16 SD; 17/21 (81%) completed resection, 16/21 (76%) R0; 14/21 (66%) completed four cycles of postoperative mFOLFIRINOX. Grade 3 and 4 toxicity occurred in 23% and 14% patients pre-operatively, 26% and 6.0% post-operatively. Nine patients are alive with median follow-up of 27.7 (3.1-47.1) months. CONCLUSIONS: PST using mFOLFIRINOX in resectable PDAC is feasible and tolerable. R0 resection rate is high and survival promising, requiring longer follow-up and larger studies for definitive assessment.

Análisis de impacto presupuestal de tecnologías para el manejo complementario de quimioterapia en Colombia / Budget impact analysis of technologies for the complementary management of chemotherapy in Colombia

INTRODUCCIÓN: El análisis de impacto presupuestal (AIP) de los medicamentos quimioterapéuticos para el tratamiento de cáncer en Colombia, se desarrolló en el marco del mecanismo técnico científico para la ampliación progresiva del Plan de Beneficios en Salud con cargo a la UPC (PBSUPC) y la definición de la lista de exclusiones, establecido en el artículo 15 de la Ley 1751 de 2015. La quimioterapia tiene un gran impacto en el tratamiento oncológico, la cual es indispensable por su valor terapéutico en varios tipos de cáncer. Esta tecnología puede ser usada sola o junto con otros tratamientos, tales como la cirugía o la radioterapia. La quimioterapia engloba a una gran variedad de fármacos y su objetivo es destruir las células tumorales con el fin de lograr la reducción de la enfermedad, los medicamentos empleados en este tipo de tratamiento se les denomina fármacos antineoplásicos. Cada tipo de tumor canceroso tiene una determinada sensibilidad a estos medicamentos, por lo tanto, es frecuente que el mismo fármaco se pueda emplear en el tratamiento de distintos tumores, variando las dosis o asociándolo a otros fármacos distintos. La quimioterapia puede ser administrada con fines curativos o para aliviar los síntomas y prolongar la supervivencia. La forma de administración de la quimioterapia es por ciclos y esto se logra alternando los periodos de tratamiento con periodos de descanso. Un ciclo es, por lo tanto, el periodo de administración del tratamiento y el de descanso hasta la siguiente administración. El objetivo de este análisis de impacto presupuestal (AIP) es estimar el esfuerzo financiero necesario para la adopción de la quimioterapia en el tratamiento de pacientes con cáncer en Colombia, en un horizonte temporal de tres años. Este documento está conformado por cuatro secciones: en la primera se identifican las tecnologías a evaluar, en la segunda sección se especifica la perspectiva, horizonte temporal y la población sobre la cual se realizó el AIP; en la sección tres se detallan los costos utilizados en el modelo, además de los escenarios planteados por los investigadores; por último, en la sección cuatro se exponen los resultados en los diferentes escenarios planteados Este documento describe la metodología desarrollada para realizar el análisis de impacto presupuestal de 21 tecnologías para el manejo quimioterapéutico del cáncer en Colombia Este informe, sigue los lineamientos propuestos en el Manual para la Elaboración de Análisis de Impacto Presupuestal y en Manual de Participación y Deliberación publicados por IETS. Insumos y método: Esta sección presenta los supuestos, parámetros y métodos utilizados para el modelo de estimación del impacto presupuestal describiendo la siguiente información: Perspectiva: La perspectiva de este AIP es la del tercer pagador el cual en nuestro contexto es el Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud (SGSSS). Horizonte temporal: El horizonte temporal de este AIP en el caso base corresponde a un año. Adicionalmente se reportan las estimaciones del impacto presupuestal para los años 2 y 3, bajo el supuesto de inclusión en el PBS en el año 1. Población total: Para el desarrollo de este AIP se parte de la población general afiliada al SGSSS colombiano sin distinción de sexo o edad. ESCENARIOS: Se consideró para la formulación de los escenarios de adopción de las tecnologías evaluadas los siguientes aspectos: 1. Los medicamentos evaluados no son alternativas terapéuticas para las patologías observadas, estas tecnologías sanitarias hacen parte de los protocolos de tratamiento con evidencia científica suficiente que garantizan su efectividad y seguridad clínica y que actualmente se encuentran en las opciones de tratamiento utilizados en la práctica clínica colombiana. 2. Al ser esquemas de tratamiento que hacen parte de protocolos estandarizados de aplicación, sí alguno de los medicamentos es sujeto de recobros ante ADRES, este trámite puede generar barreras de acceso al tratamiento hasta que se efectué la respectiva aprobación. Por lo tanto, no hay certeza de la efectividad clínica si los esquemas de tratamiento son suministrados de forma parcial o incompleta. 3. La elección del esquema de tratamiento obedece a criterios clínicos y a las características evaluadas en el paciente, no se espera una sustitución entre los diferentes esquemas sí se realiza un cambio en el mecanismo de financiamiento. 4. La adopción de las tecnologías evaluadas en este AIP no se espera que se modifiquen de manera importante, debido a que estas tecnologías hacen parte integral de los esquemas de tratamiento y su incorporación en la práctica clínica habitual en el contexto internacional y nacional, data de aproximadamente 10 a 5 años. Tambieén son parte de las opciones de primera línea de tratamiento para estadios tempranos, avanzados y localmente avanzados del paciente diagnosticado con câncer. De acuerdo a las anteriores consideraciones, al incorporar los medicamentos evaluados al PBS con cargo a la UPC, se espera la misma composición del mercado con la adopción de los nuevos medicamentos en el 100% de los tratamientos esperados en la siguiente anualidad. Los resultados esperados en el sistema de salud, en este cambio de financiamiento, se esperan obtener en dos puntos: a) En una mejor oportunidad de acceso a los esquemas de tratamiento en el SGSSS (25). b) En una mejora en la cobertura efectiva de los tratamientos de quimioterapia en pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer. RESULTADOS: Se muestra el resultado consolidado para las ventiun tecnologías objeto del Análisis de Impacto Presupuestal. La tecnología que genera un mayor impacto es Oxaliplatino, con un valor por persona de $2.363.250,76 usada en 3170 pacientes, para un total de $7.491.504.923,90. El Megestrol es la tecnología con menor impacto, con un costo por persona de $ 383.791,06 y siendo usada en 34 pacientes, tiene un valor total de $ 13.048.896,00. La tretinoina es la tecnología más económica por paciente, con un valor de $ 97.996,50, es usada en 242 personas para un total de $ 23.715.153,00. DISCUSIÓN: En la práctica actual existe un volumen amplio de recobros en el caso de estos medicamentos por usos UNIRS. En algunos casos, los cambios en el mercado farmacéutico, ya sea por el retiro de medicamentos o la llegada de ellos, hace que se modifique indicaciones ya existentes en los registros y que pueden llegar a impactar estos. usos, por ejemplo aquellos casos en los que existe la indicación antineplásico y se cambian por indicaciones especificas, que pueden no considerar condiciones de salud de baja incidencia. Como se ha caracterizado con anterioridad, el mercado de tecnologías sanitarias que se encuentran incluidas al plan de beneficios en salud con cargo a la UPC difiere sustancialmente al mercado de tecnologías sanitarias aún no financiadas por dicho mecanismo. La existencia de las Empresas Administradoras de Planes de Beneficios (EAPB) presume la existencia de un actor que al maximizar su beneficio, es un buen negociador que en cumplimiento de los principios del SGSSS, llega a un precio de equilibrio que maximiza el beneficio social. En cambio, los medicamentos que son sujetos a recobros al ADRES presume un precio fuera de aquel nivel en donde se maximiza al beneficio social, en la medida que no hay una función clara de monopsonio que coteje y negocie un precio de adquisición. En algunos casos puede llegar asumir sobrecostos que las EAPB al ser intermediarias, no tienen incentivos para efectuar un adecuado control. Con el objetivo de estimar el resultado de la incorporación de estos medicamentos al PBS con cargo a la UPC, se asumieron dos escenarios en los cuales la población objetivo del AIP se consideró constante y se asumieron los siguientes supuestos: En el primer escenario se asume que los precios observados en recobros serán el promedio de todas las transacciones de compra en la siguiente anualidad. En el segundo escenario los precios promedio de adquisición de los medicamentos evaluados, corresponden al promedio observado en SISMED como predictor de los precios de equilibrio que pueden generar las EAPB como ente negociador. Se asume que, en promedio, las EAPB son negociadores eficientes que se acercan a un precio de equilibrio que maximiza el bienestar social. Se asume que la población objetivo corresponde al total de posibles pacientes que requieren las tecnologías sanitarias en evaluación, sin que exista demanda insatisfecha para estos esquemas de tratamiento. Para su cálculo, como se presenta en la tabla 09 de los servicios prestados durante el año 2015 y recobrados al FOSYGA en los años 2015 y 2016, se calculó un valor per-cápita de acuerdo con el identificador (cedula de ciudadanía anonimizada) registrado en cada recobro. Luego, este valor es indexado a precios 2016 con el IPC reportado por el DANE a diciembre 31 del año 2015. Este valor será el comparador del precio calculado para cada uno de los medicamentos a partir de SISMED 2016.

High-Dose Filgrastim Treatment of Nonregenerative Pancytopenia Associated With Chronic Canine Ehrlichiosis.

OBJECTIVE: To report the management and outcome of a dog with canine monocytic ehrlichiosis and nonregenerative pancytopenia, with high doses of filgrastim. CASE DESCRIPTION: An 8-year-old male, mixed-breed dog, weighing 5.6kg, presented with a 1-month history of hyporexia, adynamia, and a weight loss of approximately 1kg. The general condition of the dog was observed to be poor as follows: lethargy, tachycardia, marked pallor of the mucous membranes, petechiae on the abdomen, hepatosplenomegaly, and cervical lymphadenopathy. A complete blood count analysis revealed severe leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. A direct immunofluorescence assay using anti-Ehrlichia canis-immunoglobin G (1:400) yielded positive result. The dog was diagnosed with nonregenerative pancytopenia associated with canine monocytic ehrlichiosis. The dog presented poor prognostic signs (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and severe anemia). The dog was treated with antibiotics and a short course of high-dose filgrastim (50µg/kg, SC, q 48h for 4 days) to stimulate bone marrow response, prednisone to decrease peripheral platelet destruction, and an iron supplement to compensate for the iron deficiency in the bone deposits. Although temporary side effects associated with filgrastim use, such as bone pain, bleeding, and the worsening of thrombocytopenia, were observed, the treatment improved the clinical course and the cell counts in less than a month. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The treatment protocol used in this case might be an alternative for treating cases of severe myelosuppression. This treatment plan can substantially change the clinical course of the disease for the better, compared to conventional treatment.

Accelerated versus standard epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or capecitabine as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the randomised UK TACT2 trial (CRUK/05/19): a multicentre, phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer has improved outcomes but causes toxicity. The UK TACT2 trial used a 2×2 factorial design to test two hypotheses: whether use of accelerated epirubicin would improve time to tumour recurrence (TTR); and whether use of oral capecitabine instead of cyclophosphamide would be non-inferior in terms of patients' outcomes and would improve toxicity, quality of life, or both. METHODS: In this multicentre, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older from 129 UK centres who had histologically confirmed node-positive or high-risk node-negative operable breast cancer, had undergone complete excision, and were due to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive four cycles of 100 mg/m2 epirubicin either every 3 weeks (standard epirubicin) or every 2 weeks with 6 mg pegfilgrastim on day 2 of each cycle (accelerated epirubicin), followed by four 4-week cycles of either classic cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF; 600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide intravenously on days 1 and 8 or 100 mg/m2 orally on days 1-14; 40 mg/m2 methotrexate intravenously on days 1 and 8; and 600 mg/m2 fluorouracil intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each cycle) or four 3-week cycles of 2500 mg/m2 capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 given twice daily on days 1-14 of each cycle). The randomisation schedule was computer generated in random permuted blocks, stratified by centre, number of nodes involved (none vs one to three vs four or more), age (≤50 years vs >50 years), and planned endocrine treatment (yes vs no). The primary endpoint was TTR, defined as time from randomisation to first invasive relapse or breast cancer death, with intention-to-treat analysis of standard versus accelerated epirubicin and per-protocol analysis of CMF versus capecitabine. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 68068041, and with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00301925. FINDINGS: From Dec 16, 2005, to Dec 5, 2008, 4391 patients (4371 women and 20 men) were recruited. At a median follow-up of 85·6 months (IQR 80·6-95·9) no significant difference was seen in the proportions of patients free from TTR events between the accelerated and standard epirubicin groups (overall hazard ratio [HR] 0·94, 95% CI 0·81-1·09; stratified p=0·42). At 5 years, 85·9% (95% CI 84·3-87·3) of patients receiving standard epirubicin and 87·1% (85·6-88·4) of those receiving accelerated epirubicin were free from TTR events. 4358 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis, and no difference was seen in the proportions of patients free from TTR events between the CMF and capecitabine groups (HR 0·98, 95% CI 0·85-1.14; stratified p=0·00092 for non-inferiority). Compared with baseline, significantly more patients taking CMF than those taking capecitabine had clinically relevant worsening of quality of life at end of treatment (255 [58%] of 441 vs 235 [50%] of 475; p=0·011) and at 12 months (114 [34%] of 334 vs 89 [22%] of 401; p<0·001 at 12 months) and had worse quality of life over time (p<0·0001). Detailed toxicity and quality-of-life data were collected from 2115 (48%) of treated patients. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events in cycles 1-4 were neutropenia (175 [16%]) and fatigue (56 [5%]) of the 1070 patients treated with standard epirubicin, and fatigue (63 [6%]) and infection (34 [3%]) of the 1045 patients treated with accelerated epirubicin. In cycles 5-8, the most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (321 [31%]) and fatigue (109 [11%]) in the patients treated with CMF, and hand-foot syndrome (129 [12%]) and diarrhoea (67 [6%]) in the 1044 patients treated with capcitabine. INTERPRETATION: We found no benefit from increasing the dose density of the anthracycline component of chemotherapy. However, capecitabine could be used in place of CMF without significant loss of efficacy and with improved quality of life. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, Amgen, Pfizer, and Roche.