Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Relig Health ; 63(1): 393-409, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38169027

RESUMEN

Religion and spirituality (R/S) have been linked to better physical and mental health. The US government has funded several research studies that include a focus on R/S but the amount of support over the last several years appears to be declining. To better understand these funding trends for R/S and health research, we chose relevant comparisons from projects that include a focus on social support and optimism. We identified total amount of funding, change in funding patterns over time, and characteristics of funded projects from a large database of US research projects (Federal RePORTER). We reviewed 5093 projects for social support and 6030 projects for optimism before narrowing the number of eligible studies to 170 and 13, respectively. Social support projects received the largest investment of $205 million dollars. Funded awards for social support and optimism remained stable over time while R/S decreased (p = 0.01), intervention research was more characteristic and studies of African-American/Black participants were less characteristic of funded projects in social support than of R/S (ps < 0.001). Future research for R/S and health would likely benefit from continued focus on minority communities and on identifying and developing appropriate interventions to support individual and community health and well-being.


Asunto(s)
Optimismo , Apoyo Social , Espiritualidad , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Optimismo/psicología , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación Biomédica/economía
2.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 6(1)2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35005429

RESUMEN

Background: Dissemination and implementation (D&I) research is a key factor in the uptake and use of evidence-based cancer control interventions. National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated cancer centers are ideal settings in which to further D&I knowledge. The purpose of this study was to summarize the characteristics of NCI-funded D&I science grants in the nation's cancer centers to understand the nature, extent, and opportunity for this key type of translational work. Methods: We used the National Institutes of Health Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool to identify active NCI-funded grants in D&I science at NCI clinical cancer centers (n = 13) and comprehensive cancer centers (n = 51) as well as their academic affiliates. Active projects were eligible for inclusion if they 1) were awarded directly to an NCI cancer center or an academic or research affiliate, and 2) identified D&I content in the abstract. Portfolio data were collected in February 2021. Results: We identified 104 active NCI-funded D&I research or training grants across the 64 cancer centers; 57.8% of cancer centers had at least 1 NCI-funded D&I grant. Most awards (71.1%) were for research grants. Training grants constituted 29.1% of D&I-focused grants. Overall, 50.0% of grants (n = 52) concentrated on specific cancers. Almost two-thirds of grants (n = 68, 65.4%) had a stated health equity focus. Conclusions: More than one-half of NCI-designated cancer centers have active funding in D&I science, reflecting a substantial investment by NCI. There remains considerable room for further development, which would further support NCI's translational mission.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Ciencia de la Implementación , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Neoplasias , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/economía , Estados Unidos
3.
Rev Saude Publica ; 54: 2, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32022147

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: One of the primary objectives of Brazil's conditional cash transfer program, Bolsa Família, is to break the intergenerational transmission of poverty by improving human capital via conditionalities. In this study, we hypothesized that health indicators of Bolsa Família participants would be comparable to those of other local children who were nonparticipants after two years of follow-up in the city of Acrelândia, Acre state, Western Brazilian Amazon. METHODS: Data from a population-based longitudinal study were analyzed to examine school enrollment, vaccination coverage, height and body mass index for age z-scores, and biomarkers of micronutrient deficiencies (iron and vitamin A) between Bolsa Família participants (n = 325) and nonparticipants (n = 738). RESULTS: Out of 1063 children 10 years and younger included in the 2007 baseline survey, 805 had anthropometric measurements and 402 had biochemical indicators in the 2009 follow-up survey. Prevalence rate ratio (PRR) for non-enrollment in school at 4 years of age was 0.58 (95%CI: 0.34-1.02) when comparing Bolsa Família participants with nonparticipants. No difference was found for vaccination coverage, which was insufficient for most vaccine-preventable diseases. Bolsa Família participants were less likely to show a positive change in body mass index for age z-scores compared with nonparticipants (PRR = 0.81, 95%CI: 0.70-0.95), while a positive change in height for age z-scores was similar in the groups. No differences in micronutrient deficiencies were found between groups after 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Early school enrollment and consistent nutritional indicators between Bolsa Família participants and nonparticipants suggest Bolsa Família was facilitating similarities between groups over time.


Asunto(s)
Financiación Gubernamental/métodos , Programas de Gobierno , Antropometría , Brasil , Niño , Desarrollo Infantil , Preescolar , Conducta Alimentaria , Femenino , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Asistencia Pública , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
J Aging Soc Policy ; 32(1): 15-30, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30616486

RESUMEN

The Great Recession substantially affected most developed countries. How countries responded to the Great Recession varied greatly, especially in terms of public spending. We examine the impact of the Great Recession on long-term services and supports (LTSS) in the United States and England. Financing for LTSS in these two countries differs in important ways; by examining the two countries' financing and program structures, we learn how these factors influenced each country's response to this common external stimulus. We find that between 2006 and 2013, LTSS increased in the United States in terms of spending (17%) and number of people served; in contrast, over the same period, LTSS in England decreased in terms of spending (6%) and people served. We find that the use of earmarked LTSS funding in the United States, compared to non-earmarked funding in England, contributed to different trajectories for LTSS in the two countries. Other contributing factors included differences in service entitlements, variations in ability of state and local governments to tax, and larger macroeconomic strategies implemented to combat the recession. We analyze the implications of our findings, especially as related to the potential shift to Medicaid block grant LTSS funding in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Recesión Económica , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/economía , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Personas con Discapacidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Inglaterra , Humanos , Medicaid/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
5.
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1058886

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE One of the primary objectives of Brazil's conditional cash transfer program, Bolsa Família, is to break the intergenerational transmission of poverty by improving human capital via conditionalities. In this study, we hypothesized that health indicators of Bolsa Família participants would be comparable to those of other local children who were nonparticipants after two years of follow-up in the city of Acrelândia, Acre state, Western Brazilian Amazon. METHODS Data from a population-based longitudinal study were analyzed to examine school enrollment, vaccination coverage, height and body mass index for age z-scores, and biomarkers of micronutrient deficiencies (iron and vitamin A) between Bolsa Família participants (n = 325) and nonparticipants (n = 738). RESULTS Out of 1063 children 10 years and younger included in the 2007 baseline survey, 805 had anthropometric measurements and 402 had biochemical indicators in the 2009 follow-up survey. Prevalence rate ratio (PRR) for non-enrollment in school at 4 years of age was 0.58 (95%CI: 0.34-1.02) when comparing Bolsa Família participants with nonparticipants. No difference was found for vaccination coverage, which was insufficient for most vaccine-preventable diseases. Bolsa Família participants were less likely to show a positive change in body mass index for age z-scores compared with nonparticipants (PRR = 0.81, 95%CI: 0.70-0.95), while a positive change in height for age z-scores was similar in the groups. No differences in micronutrient deficiencies were found between groups after 2 years. CONCLUSIONS Early school enrollment and consistent nutritional indicators between Bolsa Família participants and nonparticipants suggest Bolsa Família was facilitating similarities between groups over time.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Niño , Financiación Gubernamental/métodos , Programas de Gobierno , Asistencia Pública , Factores Socioeconómicos , Brasil , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Desarrollo Infantil , Antropometría , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Conducta Alimentaria , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Nacionales de Salud
6.
Rev Saude Publica ; 53: 39, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31066817

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the allocation of financial resources in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) in the state of São Paulo by level of care, health region, source of funds and level of government. METHODS: This is an exploratory study based on 2014 data extracted from the Public Health Budget Database, presented in absolute terms, relative terms and per capita . RESULTS: In 2014, R$52.1 bi were spent on public health, 58.0% having corresponded to the expenditures of the municipalities and 42.0% to those of the state government. Regional per capita spending varied from R$561.75 to R$824.85. As for the per capita spending on primary health care, which represented 37.5% of the municipalities' total expenditure, the lowest value was found in the city of São Paulo and the highest, in Araçatuba. Campinas had the highest per capita expenditure on medium and high complexity care, while Presidente Prudente had the lowest. The highest regional percentage of the current net revenue spent on health was verified in Registro, and the lowest, in the city of São Paulo. CONCLUSIONS: The paradigm of the health sector's financing in São Paulo revealed that the expenditure on primary health care, level elected by health policy as strategic because it depends on coordination and integral health care in the attention networks, was not considered a priority in relation to the expenditure with the medium and high complexity, exposing the iniquities in the state's regions.


Asunto(s)
Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/economía , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Política de Salud , Financiación de la Atención de la Salud , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Brasil , Presupuestos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ciudades , Financiación Gubernamental/economía , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Valores de Referencia
8.
Rev. saúde pública (Online) ; 53: 39, jan. 2019. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1004512

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To analyze the allocation of financial resources in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) in the state of São Paulo by level of care, health region, source of funds and level of government. METHODS This is an exploratory study based on 2014 data extracted from the Public Health Budget Database, presented in absolute terms, relative terms and per capita . RESULTS In 2014, R$52.1 bi were spent on public health, 58.0% having corresponded to the expenditures of the municipalities and 42.0% to those of the state government. Regional per capita spending varied from R$561.75 to R$824.85. As for the per capita spending on primary health care, which represented 37.5% of the municipalities' total expenditure, the lowest value was found in the city of São Paulo and the highest, in Araçatuba. Campinas had the highest per capita expenditure on medium and high complexity care, while Presidente Prudente had the lowest. The highest regional percentage of the current net revenue spent on health was verified in Registro, and the lowest, in the city of São Paulo. CONCLUSIONS The paradigm of the health sector's financing in São Paulo revealed that the expenditure on primary health care, level elected by health policy as strategic because it depends on coordination and integral health care in the attention networks, was not considered a priority in relation to the expenditure with the medium and high complexity, exposing the iniquities in the state's regions.


RESUMO OBJETIVO Analisar a alocação de recursos financeiros no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) no estado de São Paulo por nível de atenção, região de saúde, fonte de recursos e ente federado. MÉTODOS Trata-se de estudo exploratório circunscrito ao exercício de 2014. Os dados extraídos do Sistema de Informações sobre Orçamentos Públicos em Saúde estão apresentados em valores absolutos, relativos e per capita . RESULTADOS Em 2014 observou-se um gasto público com saúde de R$52,1 bi, sendo 58,0% relativos ao gasto dos municípios e 42,0% relativos ao gasto do governo do estado. O gasto regional per capita variou de R$561,75 a R$824,85. Já o gasto per capita com atenção primária à saúde, que representou 37,5% do gasto total dos municípios, foi menor na região da Grande São Paulo e maior em Araçatuba. A região de Campinas apresentou o maior gasto per capita com atenção de média e alta complexidade, enquanto Presidente Prudente teve o menor. O maior percentual regional da receita corrente líquida gasto com saúde foi verificado em Registro, e o menor na Grande São Paulo. CONCLUSÕES O paradigma de financiamento do setor da saúde em São Paulo revelou que o gasto com a atenção primária, nível eleito pela política de saúde como estratégico porque dele dependem a coordenação e o cuidado integral à saúde nas redes de atenção, não recebeu prioridade em relação ao gasto com a média e a alta complexidade, expondo as iniquidades nas regiões do estado.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/economía , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Financiación de la Atención de la Salud , Política de Salud , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Valores de Referencia , Brasil , Presupuestos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ciudades , Financiación Gubernamental/economía , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos
9.
Int J Equity Health ; 17(1): 61, 2018 05 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29776366

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Government health subsidy (GHS) is an effective tool to improve population health in China. Ensuring an equitable allocation of GHS, particularly among the poorer socio-economic groups, is a major goal of China's healthcare reform. The paper aims to explore how GHS was allocated across different socioeconomic groups, and how well the overall health system was performing in terms of the allocation of subsidy for different types of health services. METHODS: Data from China's National Health Services Survey (NHSS) in 2013 were used. Benefit incidence analysis (BIA) was applied to examine if GHS was equally distributed across income quintile. Benefit incidence was presented as each quintile's percentage share of total benefits, and the concentration index (CI) and Kakwani index (KI) were calculated. Health benefits from three types of healthcare services (primary health care, outpatient and inpatient services) were analyzed, separated into urban and rural populations. In addition, the distribution of benefits was compared to the distribution of healthcare need (measured by self-reported illness and chronic disease) across income quintiles. RESULTS: In urban populations, the CI value of GHS for primary care was negative. (- 0.14), implying an allocation tendency toward poor region; the CI values of outpatient and inpatient services were both positive (0.174 and 0.194), indicating allocation tendencies toward rich region. Similar allocation pattern was observed in rural population, with pro-poor tendency of primary care service (CI = - 0.082), and pro-rich tendencies of outpatient (CI = 0.153) and inpatient services (CI = 0.203). All the KI values of three health services in urban and rural populations were negative (- 0.4991,-0.1851 and - 0.1651; - 0.482, - 0.247and - 0.197), indicating that government health subsidy was progressive and contributed to the narrowing of economic gap between the poor and rich. CONCLUSIONS: The inequitable distribution of GHS in China exited in different healthcare services; however, the GHS benefit is generally progressive. Future healthcare reforms in China should not only focus on expanding the coverage, but also on improving the equity of distribution of healthcare benefits.


Asunto(s)
Financiación Gubernamental/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Pobreza/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Adulto , China , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
West J Emerg Med ; 18(4): 621-623, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28611882

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Receiving an R01 grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is regarded as a major accomplishment for the physician researcher and can be used as a means of scholarly activity for core faculty in emergency medicine (EM). However, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires that a grant must be obtained for it to count towards a core faculty member's scholarly activity, while the American Osteopathic Association states that an application for a grant would qualify for scholarly activity whether it is received or not. The aim of the study was to determine if a medical degree disparity exists between those who successfully receive an EM R01 grant and those who do not, and to determine the publication characteristics of those recipients. METHODS: We queried the NIH RePORTER search engine for those physicians who received an R01 grant in EM. Degree designation was then determined for each grant recipient based on a web-based search involving the recipient's name and the location where the grant was awarded. The grant recipient was then queried through PubMed central for the total number of publications published in the decade prior to receiving the grant. RESULTS: We noted a total of 264 R01 grant recipients during the study period; of those who received the award, 78.03% were allopathic physicians. No osteopathic physician had received an R01 grant in EM over the past 10 years. Of those allopathic physicians who received the grant, 44.17% held a dual degree. Allopathic physicians had an average of 48.05 publications over the 10 years prior to grant receipt and those with a dual degree had 51.62 publications. CONCLUSION: Allopathic physicians comprise the majority of those who have received an R01 grant in EM over the last decade. These physicians typically have numerous prior publications and an advanced degree.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/economía , Medicina de Emergencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Osteopática/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina de Emergencia/economía , Financiación Gubernamental/economía , Humanos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/economía , Medicina Osteopática/economía , Médicos/clasificación , Médicos/economía , Investigadores/clasificación , Investigadores/economía , Estados Unidos
11.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 12: 143, 2012 Dec 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23216874

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To bring down its high maternal mortality ratio, Burkina Faso adopted a national health policy in 2007 that designed to boost the assisted delivery rate and improving quality of emergency obstetrical and neonatal care. The cost of transportation from health centres to district hospitals is paid by the policy. The worst-off are exempted from all fees. METHODS: The objectives of this paper are to analyze perceptions of this policy by health workers, assess how this health policy was implemented at the district level, identify difficulties faced during implementation, and highlight interactional factors that have an influence on the implementation process. A multiple site case study was conducted at 6 health centres in the district of Djibo in Burkina Faso. The following sources of data were used: 1) district documents (n = 23); 2) key interviews with district health managers (n = 10), health workers (n = 16), traditional birth attendants (n = 7), and community management committees (n = 11); 3) non-participant observations in health centres; 4) focus groups in communities (n = 62); 5) a feedback session on the findings with 20 health staff members. RESULTS: All the activities were implemented as planned except for completely subsidizing the worst-off, and some activities such as surveys for patients and the quality assurance service team aiming to improve quality of care. District health managers and health workers perceived difficulties in implementing this policy because of the lack of clarity on some topics in the guidelines. Entering the data into an electronic database and the long delay in reimbursing transportation costs were the principal challenges perceived by implementers. Interactional factors such as relations between providers and patients and between health workers and communities were raised. These factors have an influence on the implementation process. Strained relations between the groups involved may reduce the effectiveness of the policy. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation analysis in the context of improving financial access to health care in African countries is still scarce, especially at the micro level. The strained relations of the providers with patients and the communities may have an influence on the implementation process and on the effects of this health policy. Therefore, power relations between actors of the health system and the community should be taken into consideration. More studies are needed to better understand the influence of power relations on the implementation process in low-income countries.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud/economía , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Política de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud Materna/economía , Burkina Faso , Parto Obstétrico , Femenino , Financiación Gubernamental/métodos , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Focales , Adhesión a Directriz/economía , Guías como Asunto , Hospitales de Distrito/economía , Humanos , Partería/economía , Embarazo , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Transporte de Pacientes/economía , Estadísticas Vitales
12.
Health Policy ; 108(1): 76-85, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22958939

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study is to present the historical and policy background of the expansion of private health insurance in South Korea in the context of the National Health Insurance (NHI) system, and to provide empirical evidence on whether the increased role of private health insurance may counterbalance government financing, social security contributions, out-of-pocket payments, and help stabilize total health care spending. METHODS: Using OECD Health Data 2011, we used a fixed effects model estimation. In this model, we allow error terms to be serially correlated over time in order to capture the association of private health insurance financing with three other components of health care financing and total health care spending. RESULTS: The descriptive observation of the South Korean health care financing shows that social security contributions are relatively limited in South Korea, implying that high out-of-pocket payments may be alleviated through the enhancement of NHI benefit coverage and an increase in social security contributions. Estimation results confirm that private health insurance financing is unlikely to reduce government spending on health care and social security contributions. We find evidence that out-of-pocket payments may be offset by private health insurance financing, but to a limited degree. Private health insurance financing is found to have a statistically significant positive association with total spending on health care. This indicates that the duplicated coverage effect on service demand may cancel out the potential efficiency gain from market initiatives driven by the active involvement of private health insurance. CONCLUSIONS: This study finds little evidence for the benefit of private insurance initiatives in coping with the fiscal challenges of the South Korean NHI program. Further studies on the managerial interplay among public and private insurers and on behavioral responses of providers and patients to a given structure of private-public financing are warranted to formulate the adequate balance between private health insurance and publicly funded universal coverage.


Asunto(s)
Seguro de Salud , Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Financiación Gubernamental/economía , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Financiación Personal/economía , Financiación Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Seguro de Salud/organización & administración , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , República de Corea
13.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 18(4): E1-3, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22635198

RESUMEN

Addressing the legal issues of patients of low socioeconomic status can be useful in increasing organizational reimbursements, reducing costs and improving access to care. Medical-legal partnership is an addition to the health care armamentarium that directly addresses this goal. A medical-legal partnership is an interdisciplinary collaboration between a medical entity such as a hospital or clinic and a legal entity such as a law school or legal aid society that addresses barriers to access to care and limitations to well-being experienced by patients of low socioeconomic status. The Health Law Partnership is one such medical legal partnership that provides a holistic, interdisciplinary approach to health care. An evaluation of the legal and educational services provided by Health Law Partnership showed that Health Law Partnership secured otherwise unreimbursed Medicaid payments for services over a 4-year period from 2006 to 2010, increased physician satisfaction, and saved hospital employers approximately $10 000 in continuing education costs annually.


Asunto(s)
Ahorro de Costo , Relaciones Interinstitucionales , Abogados , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/economía , Satisfacción Personal , Médicos/psicología , Niño , Preescolar , Educación Continua/economía , Salud de la Familia/economía , Salud de la Familia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Georgia , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/economía , Indigencia Médica , Innovación Organizacional , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Pediatría/legislación & jurisprudencia , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
14.
Int J Equity Health ; 11: 6, 2012 Feb 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22296659

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Brazil and Colombia have pursued extensive reforms of their health care systems in the last couple of decades. The purported goals of such reforms were to improve access, increase efficiency and reduce health inequities. Notwithstanding their common goals, each country sought a very different pathway to achieve them. While Brazil attempted to reestablish a greater level of State control through a public national health system, Colombia embraced market competition under an employer-based social insurance scheme. This work thus aims to shed some light onto why they pursued divergent strategies and what that has meant in terms of health outcomes. METHODS: A critical review of the literature concerning equity frameworks, as well as the health care reforms in Brazil and Colombia was conducted. Then, the shortfall inequality values of crude mortality rate, infant mortality rate, under-five mortality rate, and life expectancy for the period 1960-2005 were calculated for both countries. Subsequently, bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed and controlled for possibly confounding factors. RESULTS: When controlling for the underlying historical time trend, both countries appear to have experienced a deceleration of the pace of improvements in the years following the reforms, for all the variables analyzed. In the case of Colombia, some of the previous gains in under-five mortality rate and crude mortality rate were, in fact, reversed. CONCLUSIONS: Neither reform seems to have had a decisive positive impact on the health outcomes analyzed for the defined time period of this research. This, in turn, may be a consequence of both internal characteristics of the respective reforms and external factors beyond the direct control of health reformers. Among the internal characteristics: underfunding, unbridled decentralization and inequitable access to care seem to have been the main constraints. Conversely, international economic adversities, high levels of rural and urban violence, along with entrenched income inequalities seem to have accounted for the highest burden among external factors.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Económica/tendencias , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/normas , Servicios de Salud del Indígena/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Tasa de Natalidad/etnología , Tasa de Natalidad/tendencias , Brasil/epidemiología , Preescolar , Colombia/epidemiología , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Comparación Transcultural , Femenino , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios de Salud del Indígena/economía , Servicios de Salud del Indígena/normas , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/normas , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Mortalidad Infantil/etnología , Mortalidad Infantil/tendencias , Recién Nacido , Esperanza de Vida/etnología , Esperanza de Vida/tendencias , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Mortalidad/etnología , Mortalidad/tendencias , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Factores de Tiempo
15.
Nefrologia ; 31(6): 656-63, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22130280

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the discrepancy in results from Spanish studies on the costs of dialysis, it is assumed that peritoneal dialysis (PD) is more efficient than haemodialysis (HD). OBJECTIVES: To analyse the costs and added value of HD and PD outsourcing agreements in Galicia, the medical transport for HD and the relationship between the cost of the agreement and the cost of consumables used in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) with bicarbonate. METHODS: The cost of the outsourcing agreements and the staff was obtained from official publications. The cost of PD and medical transport were calculated using health service data for one month and extrapolating it to one year. The cost of CAPD consumables was provided by the suppliers. The added value was calculated from the investments generated for each agreement treating 40 patients. RESULTS: Expressed as patient/year, the mean costs for treatment were €21595 and €25664 in HD and PD, respectively. Medical transport varied between €3323 and €6338, while those of the CAPD agreement and consumables were €19268 and €12057, respectively. The added value was greater with the HD agreement, especially considering the jobs created. CONCLUSIONS: One cannot generalise that the cost of PD, which is significantly influenced by prescriptions, is lower than that of HD. It would be appropriate to review the additional cost to consumables in the CAPD agreement. The added value generated by dialysis agreements should be considered in future studies and in health planning. More controlled studies are needed to better understand this issue.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Externos/economía , Diálisis Peritoneal/economía , Diálisis Renal/economía , Bicarbonatos/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Soluciones para Diálisis/economía , Equipos Desechables/economía , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud/economía , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Diálisis Peritoneal/instrumentación , Diálisis Peritoneal Ambulatoria Continua/economía , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Diálisis Renal/instrumentación , Seguridad Social/economía , España , Transporte de Pacientes/economía
16.
Health Serv Res ; 46(6pt2): 2101-18, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22092227

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To understand the forces propelling countries to legislate universal health insurance. DATA SOURCE/STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive review and exploratory synthesis of historic data on economic, geographic, socio-demographic, and political factors. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: We searched under "insurance, health" on MEDLINE and Google Scholar, and we reviewed relevant books and articles via a snowball approach. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Ten countries with universal health insurance were studied. For the five countries that passed final universal insurance laws prior to 1958, we found that two forces of "historical context" (i.e., social solidarity and historic patterns), one "ongoing dynamic force" (political pressures), and "one uniqueness of the moment" force (legislative permissiveness) played a major role. For the five countries that passed final legislation between 1967 and 2010, the predominant factors were two "ongoing dynamic forces" (economic pressures and political pressures) and one "uniqueness of the moment" force (leadership). In general, countries in the former group made steady progress, whereas those in the latter group progressed in abrupt leaps. CONCLUSIONS: The lessons of more recent successes-almost all of which were achieved via abrupt leaps-strongly indicate the importance of leadership in taking advantage of generalized economic and political pressures to achieve universal health insurance.


Asunto(s)
Reforma de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Beneficios del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Beneficios del Seguro/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/economía , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/organización & administración
18.
Haematologica ; 92(5): 666-73, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17488691

RESUMEN

The costs of home care (HC) programs may be tailored to the specific needs of patients with hematological malignancies. The aim of this study was to analyze the use of resources and the costs of a program of HC for four different prognostic groups of patients subdivided according to disease status. Over 2 years, 144 patients with hematological malignancies were assisted at home. Patients were subdivided according to disease status and life expectancy in the following groups: (i) terminal phase, with a life expectancy of 3 months or less; (ii) advanced phase, with a life expectancy of 6 months or less; (iii) chronic phase, with a life expectancy of more than 6 months; (iv) discharged early from the hospital with curable disease, following anticancer chemotherapy. Median mean monthly costs (MMC) in Euro (x) have been compared with the costs of hospitalization (DRG). Among the 4 groups of patients, those discharged early and in terminal phase required the highest mean monthly number of home visits (27.2 and 24.1), transfusions (6.1 and 6.8) and days of care (22.8 and 19.7) respectively. MMC were affected by the following variables: disease status and transfusion requirements. MMC for terminal patients (4,232.50x) and those discharged early (3,986.40x) were higher than those for advanced (2,303.80x) and chronic patients (1,488,30x). The cost of HC was lower than the corresponding DRG charges, but exceeded the district fares for HC of cancer patients. In hematological patients, the costs of HC differ according to disease status and transfusion requirements. For some categories of patients, costs of HC are lower than those of hospitalization, although higher than the current national fares for HC programs.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/economía , Cuidados Paliativos/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Transfusión Sanguínea/economía , Niño , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Organización de la Financiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/economía , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Humanos , Italia , Estado de Ejecución de Karnofsky , Esperanza de Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Organizaciones sin Fines de Lucro , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/economía , Cuidado Terminal/economía , Universidades
20.
Health Econ ; 16(4): 385-93, 2007 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16998784

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health care funding levels differ significantly across geographic regions, but there is little correlation between regional funding levels and outcomes of elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Our goal was to determine whether this relationship holds true in a non-Medicare population cared for in a large integrated health care system with a capitated budget allocation system. METHODS: We explored the association between health care funding and risk-adjusted mortality in the 22 Veterans Affairs (VA) geographic Networks over a six-year time period. Allocations to Networks were adjusted for illness burden using Diagnostic Cost Groups. To test the association between funding and risk-adjusted three-year mortality, we ran logistic regressions with single-year patient cohorts, as well as hierarchical regressions on a six year longitudinal data set, clustering on VA Network. RESULTS: A 1000 dollar increase in funding per unit of patient illness burden was associated with a 2-8% reduction in three-year mortality in cross sectional regressions. However, in longitudinal hierarchical regressions clustering on Network, the significant effect of funding level was eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: When longitudinal data are used, the significant cross sectional effect of funding levels on mortality disappear. Thus, the factors driving differences in mortality are Network effects, although part of the Network effect may be due to past levels of funding. Our results provide a caution for cross sectional examinations of the association between regional health care funding levels and health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Financiación Gubernamental/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Veteranos/economía , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Femenino , Geografía , Hospitales de Veteranos/normas , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Econométricos , Mortalidad/tendencias , Ajuste de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA