A germline c.1546dupC MEN1 mutation in an MEN1 family: A case report.

RATIONALE: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare tumor syndrome with an autosomal dominant inheritance, and genetic testing for MEN1 gene is important for both affected individuals and their relatives. We present a 2-person family affected by a germline c.1546dupC MEN1 mutation, and one of them had a full-spectrum of MEN-related endocrine tumors. PATIENT CONCERNS: A female patient aged 32 years presented with jejunal ulcer perforation due to gastrinoma. DIAGNOSES: We conducted genetic analysis and extensive biochemical/radiological evaluation for detecting other endocrine tumors. Multiple pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), prolactinoma and primary hyperparathyroidism were diagnosed, and a frame-shift mutation, NM_130799.1:c.1546dupC (p.Arg516Profs∗15), was detected. One daughter of the proband, aged 12 years, had the same mutation for MEN1. INTERVENTION: She underwent pancreatic surgery for pancreatic NETs and total parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. OUTCOMES: After pancreatic surgery, long-term symptoms of epigastric soreness, acid belching, sweating, and palpitation in fasting were improved. Hypercalcemia was improved after parathyroidectomy and she was supplemented with oral calcium and vitamin D. Her daughter showed normal biochemical surveillance until 15 years of age. LESSONS: We report 2 people in a family affected by MEN1 with the heterozygous germline c.1546dupC mutation, a variant that should be surveilled for early development of full-blown MEN1-associated endocrine tumors.

Secretin-receptor and secretin-receptor-variant expression in gastrinomas: correlation with clinical and tumoral features and secretin and calcium provocative test results.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome requires secretin testing in 60% of patients. Even with secretin, the diagnosis may be difficult because variable responses occur, and 6-30% have negative testing. The basis for variability or negative responses is unclear. It is unknown whether the tumor density of secretin receptors or the presence of a secretin-receptor-variant, which can act as a dominant negative, is important. The aim of this study was to investigate these possibilities. PATIENTS/METHODS: Secretin-receptor and variant mRNA expression was determined in gastrinomas using real-time PCR from 54 Zollinger-Ellison syndrome patients. Results were correlated with Western blotting, secretin-receptor immunohistochemistry, with gastrin-provocative test results and tumoral/clinical/laboratory features. RESULTS: Secretin-receptor mRNA was detectible in all gastrinomas but varied 132-fold with a mean of 0.89 +/- 0.12 molecules per beta-actin. Secretin-receptor PCR results correlated closely with Western blotting (r = 0.95; P < 0.0001) and receptor immunohistochemistry (P = 0.0015; r = 0.71). The variant was detected in all gastrinomas, but levels varied 102-fold and were 72-fold lower than the total. Secretin-receptor levels correlated with variant levels, Deltasecretin, but not Deltacalcium and with tumor location, but not growth, extent, or clinical responses. Variant levels did not correlate with the Deltasecretin. Detailed analysis provides no evidence that variant expression modified the secretin-receptor response or accounted for negative tests. CONCLUSIONS: Secretin-receptor and secretin-receptor-variant expressions occur in all gastrinomas. Because the expression of the total, but not variant, correlated with the secretin results and no evidence for dominant negative activity of the variant was found, our results suggest that the total secretin-receptor density is an important determinant of the secretin test response.