Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 38
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 21(1): 670, 2021 Oct 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34602060

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus currently cause a lot of pressure on the health system. Accordingly, many changes occurred in the way of providing health care, including pregnancy and childbirth care. To our knowledge, no studies on experiences of maternity care Providers during the COVID-19 Pandemic have been published in Iran. We aimed to discover their experiences on pregnancy and childbirth care during the current COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This study was a qualitative research performed with a descriptive phenomenological approach. The used sampling method was purposive sampling by taking the maximum variation possible into account, which continued until data saturation. Accordingly, in-depth and semi-structured interviews were conducted by including 12 participants, as 4 gynecologists, 6 midwives working in the hospitals and private offices, and 2 midwives working in the health centers. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven stage method with MAXQDA10 software. RESULTS: Data analysis led to the extraction of 3 themes, 9 categories, and 25 subcategories. The themes were as follows: "Fear of Disease", "Burnout", and "Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic", respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal health care providers experience emotional and psychological stress and work challenges during the current COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, comprehensive support should be provided for the protection of their physical and mental health statuses. By working as a team, utilizing the capacity of telemedicine to care and follow up mothers, and providing maternity care at home, some emerged challenges to maternal care services can be overcome.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Personal de Salud/psicología , Servicios de Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Perinatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Agotamiento Psicológico/psicología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , Emociones/fisiología , Femenino , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Entrevistas como Asunto , Irán/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Materna/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Perinatal/organización & administración , Trastornos Fóbicos/psicología , Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Telemedicina/métodos
2.
Med Care ; 59(Suppl 5): S434-S440, 2021 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34524240

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim was to explore the association between community health centers' (CHC) distance to a "maternity care desert" (MCD) and utilization of maternity-related health care services, controlling for CHC and county-level factors. MEASURES: Utilization as: total number of CHC visits to obstetrician-gynecologists, certified nurse midwives, family physicians (FP), and nurse practitioners (NP); total number of prenatal care visits and deliveries performed by CHC staff. RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-sectional design comparing utilization between CHCs close to MCDs and those that were not, using linked 2017 data from the Uniform Data System (UDS), American Hospital Association Survey, and Area Health Resource Files. On the basis of prior research, CHCs close to a "desert" were hypothesized to provide higher numbers of FP and NP visits than obstetrician-gynecologists and certified nurse midwives visits. The sample included 1261 CHCs and all counties in the United States and Puerto Rico (n=3234). RESULTS: Results confirm the hypothesis regarding NP visits but are mixed for FP visits. CHCs close to "deserts" had more NP visits than those that were not. There was also a dose-response effect by MCD classification, with NP visits 3 times higher at CHCs located near areas without any outpatient and inpatient access to maternity care. CONCLUSIONS: CHCs located closer to "deserts" and NPs working at these comprehensive, primary care clinics have an important role to play in providing access to maternity care. More research is needed to determine how best to target resources to these limited access areas.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Comunitarios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud de la Mujer/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Geografía , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Área sin Atención Médica , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermeras Practicantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos de Familia/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
3.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 50(4): 102044, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33346160

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Informing couples about the diagnosis of severe fetal pathologies is part of the daily routine in fetal medicine. This situation is usually complex and can put untrained professionals in an uncomfortable position. The aim of this study was to assess the perception of health care professionals when faced with the need to announce a fetal pathology in order to target their training gaps in this domain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was created and disseminated on a national level among physicians practicing or collaborating with the multidisciplinary centers of prenatal diagnosis in France. The questionnaire focused on the difficulties encountered by practitioners when announcing fetal pathologies, and their potential interest in simulation sessions regarding the delivery of bad news. RESULTS: 193 participants filled the questionnaire. 65 % report not receiving any theoretical courses in this field during their initial training, 49 % admit feeling uncomfortable when a fetal anomaly needs to be announced, 79.5 % think that role-play could help them, 87.5 % believe that training sessions in communication skills would help improve their methods and 73.1 % support teaching the delivery of bad news by simulation sessions. CONCLUSION: This survey illustrates the significance of announcing a fetal pathology for fetal medicine professionals. Many of them report not being properly trained to cope with this situation and would like to improve with a more practical way of teaching. Simulation would be the ideal educational tool to meet this demand.


Asunto(s)
Feto/anomalías , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Perinatología/educación , Entrenamiento Simulado , Revelación de la Verdad , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Francia , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Perinatología/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiología/estadística & datos numéricos , Desempeño de Papel , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0240700, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33301492

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rural health disparities and access gaps may contribute to higher maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. Understanding and addressing access barriers for specialty women's health services is important in mitigating risks for adverse childbirth events. The objective of this study was to investigate rural-urban differences in health care access for women of reproductive age by examining differences in past-year provider visit rates by provider type, and quantifying the contributing factors to these findings. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Using a nationally-representative sample of reproductive age women (n = 37,026) from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2010-2015) linked to the Area Health Resource File, rural-urban differences in past-year office visit rates with health care providers were examined. Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analysis quantified the portion of disparities explained by individual- and county-level sociodemographic and provider supply characteristics. Overall, there were no rural-urban differences in past-year visits with women's health providers collectively (65.0% vs 62.4%), however differences were observed by provider type. Rural women had lower past-year obstetrician-gynecologist (OB-GYN) visit rates than urban women (23.3% vs. 26.6%), and higher visit rates with family medicine physicians (24.3% vs. 20.9%) and nurse practitioners/physician assistants (NPs/PAs) (24.6% vs. 16.1%). Lower OB-GYN availability in rural versus urban counties (6.1 vs. 13.7 providers/100,000 population) explained most of the rural disadvantage in OB-GYN visit rates (83.8%), and much of the higher family physician (80.9%) and NP/PA (50.1%) visit rates. Other individual- and county-level characteristics had smaller effects on rural-urban differences. CONCLUSION: Although there were no overall rural-urban differences in past-year visit rates, the lower OB-GYN availability in rural areas appears to affect the types of health care providers seen by women. Whether rural women are receiving adequate specialized women's health care services, while seeing a different cadre of providers, warrants further investigation and has particular relevance for women experiencing high-risk pregnancies and deliveries.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud para Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermeras Practicantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Asistentes Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos de Familia/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Autoinforme/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
5.
Urology ; 142: 87-93, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32437771

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate utilization of third-line overactive bladder (OAB) treatments including percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), sacral nerve stimulation (SNS), and intradetrusor botulinum toxin A (BTX) among privately insured patients and examine factors associated with their use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using MarketScan claims (2015-2017), we identified patients who underwent third-line OAB treatments based on procedure codes. Factors of interest included location, age, health plan, among others. We fit multivariable logistic regression models to estimate associations between pertinent factors with receipt of PTNS and SNS relative to BTX and associations between provider type and practice location with each treatment modality. RESULTS: We identified 7383 patients (mean age 50.9) in our cohort. SNS was used most frequently (n = 3602, 48.8%), while PTNS was used least frequently (n = 955, 12.9%). PTNS patients were more likely to reside in metropolitan areas (vs BTX: OR 1.6, 95%CI 1.3-2.1; vs SNS: OR 2.2, 95%CI 1.7-2.8), be aged 55 years or older (vs BTX: 54% vs 47%, OR 1.6, 95%CI 1.2-2.1; vs SNS: 54% vs 45%, OR 1.6, 95%CI 1.2-2.0), and be covered under a health maintenance organization (vs BTX: 17% vs 10%; vs SNS: 17% vs 10%, P <.01). Urologists were most likely to perform SNS, and gynecologists were most likely to perform BTX. 91% of PTNS procedures were performed in office settings. CONCLUSION: Among patients receiving third-line OAB treatment, PTNS was used infrequently. PTNS utilization was concentrated within urban areas, and among older patients and those covered by cost-conscious health maintenance organizations.


Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/administración & dosificación , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Nervio Tibial/fisiopatología , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/estadística & datos numéricos , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Ginecología/economía , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/economía , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares/economía , Inyecciones Intramusculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/economía , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Vejiga Urinaria/efectos de los fármacos , Vejiga Urinaria/inervación , Vejiga Urinaria/fisiopatología , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva/economía , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva/fisiopatología , Urología/economía , Urología/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
6.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 36(10): 854-859, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32252571

RESUMEN

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder in reproductive-aged women. A recent study found that many obstetrics and gynecology (ObGyn) practicing physicians are unaware of the Rotterdam criteria recommended for diagnosis. Our objective was to identify gaps in trainee knowledge of PCOS diagnostic criteria and management. An online survey was sent out to US ObGyn physicians-in-training in 2018. The primary outcomes were identification of at least one component of each Rotterdam criteria (Rot-3): (1) oligomenorrhea/amenorrhea, (2) clinical or biochemical hyperandrogenism, and (3) ovarian volume or antral follicle count, and identification of all five components (Rot-5). Secondary outcomes were identification of comorbidities and management of PCOS. Multivariable logistic regression was used controlling for gender, seniority (PGY) status, program type, completion of an REI rotation, and number of PCOS patients seen. 85.4% of 347 trainees completing the survey reported using Rotterdam criteria to diagnose PCOS. However, only 55% identified Rot-3 and less than 10% identified Rot-5. Seniority (PGY4 OR 2.2; 95% CI: 1.2-4.1; p = .01) and completion of REI rotation (OR 1.8 95% CI: 1.2, 1.8; p = .006) were associated with identifying Rot-3. Similar findings were noted with identifying Rot-5. Our study identified significant gaps in knowledge regarding PCOS, suggesting an urgent need for improving strategies for trainee education to increase patient satisfaction and provide comprehensive care.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Ginecología/educación , Obstetricia/educación , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/diagnóstico , Femenino , Ginecología/normas , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Masculino , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/terapia
7.
Medwave ; 19(5): e7658, 2019 Jun 26.
Artículo en Español, Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31442215

RESUMEN

OBJETIVE: To describe the characteristics of the scientific production of midwives in Latin American obstetrics and gynecology journals indexed to Scopus during the period 2011 to 2016. METHODS: This paper reports a descriptive bibliometric study, with intentional non-probabilistic sampling. We analyzed articles of research papers published by midwives in medical specialty journals in obstetrics and gynecology of Latin America indexed to Scopus, in the 2011 to 2016 period. RESULTS: We found eight obstetrics and gynecology journals in Latin America indexed in Scopus. There were 1,696 articles published between 2011 and 2016, of which 4.9% were authored or co-authored by midwives. Of these publications, 93.8% were related to topics of the specialty, 62.5% had midwives as corresponding authors, 64.1% of papers were in Spanish, only 3.1% were published in English, and 57.8% of midwives worked in Chile at the time of publication. In 2016, there was one-fifth the number of publications compared to 2012. CONCLUSIONS: We found little scientific production by midwives in Latin American obstetrics and gynecology journals indexed in Scopus. Strategies that encourage and allow research and scientific production by midwives are needed.


OBJETIVO: Describir las características de la producción científica de matrones en revistas latinoamericanas de obstetricia y ginecología, indizadas a Scopus durante el periodo 2011 a 2016. MÉTODOS: Estudio bibliométrico descriptivo, con muestreo intencional no probabilístico. Se analizaron artículos de trabajos de investigación publicados por matrones en revistas de especialidad médica en obstetricia y ginecología de Latinoamérica indizadas a Scopus, en el periodo comprendido entre 2011 y 2016. RESULTADOS: Se encontraron ocho revistas de obstetricia y ginecología en Latinoamérica indizadas en Scopus. Se contabilizaron 1 696 artículos publicados entre 2011 y 2016, de los cuales 4,9% los matrones fueron autores o coautores. De ese subtotal, 93,8% publicó temas propios de la especialidad; 62,5% fueron autores corresponsales; 64,1% de las publicaciones fueron en español; solo 3,1% publicó en inglés y 57,8% de matrones trabajaban en Chile al momento de la publicación. En 2016 se publicaron cinco veces menos que en 2012. CONCLUSIÓN: Se halló escasa producción científica realizada por matrones en revistas latinoamericanas de obstetricia y ginecología indizadas en Scopus. Se sugiere emplear estrategias que incentiven y permitan la investigación y producción científica en los matrones.


Asunto(s)
Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Bibliometría , Humanos , América Latina
8.
Obstet Gynecol ; 134(3): 520-526, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31403600

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health care provider adherence to the surgical protocol endorsed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists at the time of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and compare adherence between gynecologic oncologists and obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns). METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, women were included if they had a pathogenic BRCA mutation and underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy between 2011 and 2017. Adherence was defined as completing all of the following: collection of washings, complete resection of the fallopian tube, and performing the Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbriated End (SEE-FIM) pathologic protocol. RESULTS: Of 290 patients who met inclusion criteria, 160 patients were treated by 18 gynecologic oncologists and 130 patients by 75 ob-gyns. Surgery was performed at 10 different hospitals throughout a single metropolitan area. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Overall, 199 cases (69%) were adherent to the surgical protocol. Gynecologic oncologists were more than twice as likely to fully adhere to the full surgical protocol as ob-gyns (91% vs 41%, P<.01). Specifically, gynecologic oncologists were more likely to resect the entire tube (99% vs 95%, P=.03), to have followed the SEE-FIM protocol (98% vs 82%, P<.01), and collect washings (94% vs 49%, P<.01). Complication rates did not differ between groups. Occult neoplasia was diagnosed in 11 patients (3.8%). The incidence of occult neoplasia was 6.3% in gynecologic oncology patients and 0.8% in obstetrics and gynecology patients (P=.03). CONCLUSION: Despite clear surgical guidelines, only two thirds of all health care providers were fully adherent to guidelines. Gynecologic oncologists were more likely to follow surgical guidelines compared with general ob-gyns and more likely to diagnose occult neoplasia despite similar patient populations. Rates of risk-reducing surgery will likely continue to increase as genetic testing becomes more widespread, highlighting the importance of health care provider education for this procedure. Centralized care or referral to subspecialists for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy may be warranted.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Profilácticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Salpingooforectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Oncología Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/genética , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/prevención & control , Trompas Uterinas/cirugía , Femenino , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Ginecología/normas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obstetricia/normas , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Neoplasias Ováricas/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Profilácticos/normas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Salpingooforectomía/normas , Oncología Quirúrgica/normas
9.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 19(1): 164, 2019 May 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31077167

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with the timing of the first prenatal ultrasound in Canada. METHODS: This was a secondary data analysis of the Maternity Experiences Survey, a cross-sectional survey covering different aspects of pregnancy, labour, birth and the post-partum period. Bivariate and multivariate multinomial logistic regressions were performed to assess the relationship between timing of first prenatal ultrasound and different independent variables. RESULTS: 68.4% of Canadian women received an optimally timed first prenatal ultrasound, 27.4% received early ultrasounds and 4.3% received late ultrasound. The highest prevalence of early ultrasound was in Ontario (33.3%) and the lowest was in Manitoba (13.3%). The highest prevalence of late ultrasound was found in Manitoba (12.1%) and the lowest was in British Columbia and Ontario (3.5% each). The highest prevalence of optimal timing of first prenatal ultrasound was in Quebec (77%) and the lowest was in Ontario (63.2%). Factors influencing the timing of ultrasound included: Early - maternal age < 20 (adjusted OR = 0.54, 95%CI:0.34-0.84), alcohol use during pregnancy (adjusted OR = 0.69, 95%CI:0.53-0.90), history of premature birth (adjusted OR = 1.41, 95%CI:1.06-1.89), multiparity (adjusted OR = 0.67, 95%CI:0.57-0.78), born outside of Canada (adjusted OR = 0.82, 95%CI:0.67-0.99), prenatal care in Newfoundland and Labrador (adjusted OR = 1.66, 95%CI:1.20-1.30), Nova Scotia (adjusted OR = 1.68, 95%CI:1.25-2.28), Ontario (adjusted OR = 2.16, 95%CI:1.76-2.65), Saskatchewan (adjusted OR = 1.50, 95%CI:1.05-2.14), Alberta (adjusted OR = 1.37, 95%CI:1.05-1.77) British Columbia (adjusted OR = 1.90, 95%CI:1.45-2.50) and Manitoba (adjusted OR = 0.66, 95%CI:0.45-0.98) Late - unintended pregnancy (adjusted OR = 1.89, 95%CI:1.38-2.59), born outside of Canada (adjusted OR = 1.75, 95%CI:1.14-2.68), prenatal care in Manitoba (adjusted OR = 2.88, 95%CI:1.64-5.05) and the Territories (adjusted OR = 4.50, 95%CI:2.27-8.93). An interaction between history of miscarriage and having 'other' prenatal care provider significantly affected timing of ultrasound (adjusted OR = 0.31, 95%CI:0.14-0.66). CONCLUSION: Only 68% of Canadian women received an optimally timed prenatal ultrasound which was influenced by several factors including province of prenatal care, maternal age and country of birth, and an interaction effect between prenatal care provider and history of miscarriage. These findings establish a baseline of factors influencing the timing of prenatal ultrasound in Canada, which can be built upon by future studies.


Asunto(s)
Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Adulto , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Edad Materna , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Paridad , Embarazo , Embarazo no Planeado , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Atención Prenatal , Historia Reproductiva , Características de la Residencia , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
10.
Obstet Gynecol ; 132(5): 1121-1129, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30303907

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and results of incorporating routine hereditary cancer risk assessment, counseling, and follow-up genetic testing in the community obstetrics and gynecology practice setting without referral to a genetic counselor. METHODS: This prospective process intervention study was conducted with two obstetrics and gynecology practice groups (five sites). The intervention included baseline process assessment, refinement of clinic-specific patient screening workflows and tools, and training in hereditary cancer risk screening and follow-up. Outcomes related to hereditary cancer assessment and testing were measured during an 8-week postintervention period. Patients and health care providers were surveyed about satisfaction with the process. Data also were collected during the 8 weeks before the intervention to assess the effects of screening process improvements. RESULTS: A total of 4,107 patients were seen during the postintervention period, and 92.8% (3,811) were assessed for hereditary cancer risk. Among those assessed, 906 of 3,811 (23.8%) women met National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for genetic testing, and 813 of 906 (89.7%) eligible patients were offered genetic testing. A total of 165 of 4,107 (4.0%) women completed genetic testing and received a final test result. This represents a fourfold increase over genetic testing immediately before the intervention (1.1%) and an eightfold increase over the previous year (0.5%). Testing identified pathogenic variants in 9 of 165 (5.5%) tested women. All health care providers (15/15) reported that they will continue to use the established hereditary cancer risk assessment process. In addition, 98.8% (167/169) of patients who submitted a sample for genetic testing and completed a patient satisfaction survey stated that they were able to understand the information provided, and 97.6% (165/169) expressed satisfaction with the overall process. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to incorporate hereditary cancer risk assessment, education, and testing into community obstetrics and gynecology practices. As a result, multigene panel testing identified significant cancer risks that otherwise would not have been recognized.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Genéticas/estadística & datos numéricos , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/genética , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Quinasa de Punto de Control 2/genética , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Proteína del Grupo de Complementación N de la Anemia de Fanconi/genética , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Asesoramiento Genético , Pruebas Genéticas/tendencias , Ginecología/organización & administración , Ginecología/tendencias , Humanos , Obstetricia/organización & administración , Obstetricia/tendencias , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Satisfacción del Paciente , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Flujo de Trabajo
11.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 40(9): 1139-1147, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30030057

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The relative risk of invasive listeriosis in pregnant women is approximately 20 times greater than the general population, and listeriosis during pregnancy can have negative consequences for pregnant women, their fetuses, and their newborns. Health care providers are valuable sources of information, but published data suggest that most providers are unaware of the risk factors for listeriosis or its propensity for pregnant women, and they do not counsel their pregnant patients about risks. The objective of this study was to determine knowledge and practices of Canadian perinatal care providers on food safety counselling to pregnant women. METHODS: An anonymous bilingual online questionnaire that sought information about awareness, knowledge of risk factors, practices for counselling pregnant women, and practitioners' learning needs with regard to listeriosis was sent to 3199 nurses, midwives, family physicians, and obstetrician/gynaecologists in Canada, with a response rate of 24.4%. RESULTS: Most respondents had heard of listeriosis, provided prenatal care, and attended deliveries. Rates of awareness of listeriosis were the same among professions and were independent of years in practice, whether practice was urban or rural, and province. One third of the respondents (35.7%) were aware that listeriosis was more common in pregnant women; a minority (18.7%) correctly identified the incubation period for listeriosis and the stage in pregnancy in which women are at highest risk (30.4%). Those respondents who did not counsel women about the risks of listeriosis during pregnancy reported a lack of information or knowledge as the main reason. CONCLUSION: Advising pregnant women about behaviours and lifestyle habits to prevent infectious diseases remains important, and information about preventive practices needs to be complete and adequate. The health care providers who participated in this study did express a clear need for information related to food safety during pregnancy and listeriosis, as supported by their lack of knowledge in some areas. If that lack is remedied, the knowledge gained could improve counselling practices.


Asunto(s)
Consejo Dirigido , Inocuidad de los Alimentos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Listeriosis/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Femenino , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermería Obstétrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
12.
S D Med ; 70(11): 493-497, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29088520

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods, including the intrauterine device (IUD) and the birth control implant, are the most effective form of prescribed birth control for pregnancy prevention. However, uptake of this highly effective form of birth control is slow. The purpose of this study was to explore use of the LARC methods in South Dakota women prescribed contraception and the importance of the provider in promoting this type of contraception. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of female patients who had been prescribed contraception at one of five locations in a South Dakota hospital system. Records were obtained through electronic health records for a six-month period. Descriptive analysis was performed using chi-square with counts and percentages. Logistic regression was used to determine differences in LARC prescriptions by patient age and provider title. RESULTS: A total of 2,174 individual patients were included in analysis. Of the 378 (17.4 percent) who were prescribed LARC methods, most (78.6 percent) were prescribed an IUD. Younger women (aged 11-19) were less likely to be prescribed LARCs compared to women aged 30-34. There were also significant differences in LARC prescriptions by provider type. Futhermore, we noted differences in LARC prescriptions for a provider who received a specific education and training on LARC from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. CONCLUSIONS: There are many important factors to consider by the patient when choosing the most appropriate contraceptive method, including safety, effectiveness, accessibility, and affordability. Provider education may play an important role in promoting LARC methods.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos Intrauterinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anticoncepción Reversible de Larga Duración/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Niño , Conducta Anticonceptiva , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Ginecología/educación , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/educación , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Asistentes Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Análisis de Regresión , South Dakota , Adulto Joven
13.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 57(5): 558-563, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28691771

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the most common invasive gynaecological cancer in Australia. Despite the fact that review after treatment of early endometrial cancer has not been shown to detect recurrent disease, practice at several hospitals brings women back for specialist hospital review for 5 years after definitive cancer surgery. AIM: Implement an improved model of follow-up care following hospital treatment for early endometrial cancer. EVALUATION METHODS: Quantitative and qualitative. RESULTS: Seventy-three of the eligible 81 women undertook the model of care. All general practitioners (GPs) agreed to follow-up care. Thirty-one women (42%) and 37 GPs (51%) returned surveys. All women found the nurse consultation very useful or useful with 77% reporting making lifestyle changes and 87% found the GP consultation very useful or useful with 72% reporting making lifestyle changes. Eighty-nine percent of GPs found the care plan useful, 94% set up patient recall systems, 79% used the care plan to develop their own care plan, 100% felt confident in providing follow-up care with 91% reporting the care plan and hospital processes improved their confidence. Comparison with the pre-cohort women showed: higher rates of communication at various care points to GPs (from P < 0.001); more referrals (P < 0.001); and a projected decrease of nine hospital doctor appointments per patient. DISCUSSION: With an increasing number of people surviving cancer, in order to address holistic health needs and maintain tertiary service capacity, general practice will be required to provide more follow-up care. Our model demonstrates an acceptable and quality mechanism for this to occur.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/organización & administración , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Medicina General/métodos , Modelos Teóricos , Pase de Guardia , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Comunicación , Consejo Dirigido , Neoplasias Endometriales/enfermería , Femenino , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Estilo de Vida Saludable , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Derivación y Consulta , Autoeficacia , Recursos Humanos
14.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 96(9): 1075-1083, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28524258

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to examine whether cardiotocography (CTG) knowledge, interpretation skills and decision-making measured by a written assessment were associated with size of maternity unit, years of obstetric work experience and healthcare professional background. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A national cross-sectional study in the setting of a CTG teaching intervention involving all 24 maternity units in Denmark. Participants were midwives (n = 1260) and specialists (n = 269) and residents (n = 142) in obstetrics and gynecology who attended a 1-day CTG course and answered a 30-item multiple-choice question test. Associations between mean test score and work conditions were analyzed using multivariable robust regression, in which the three variables were mutually adjusted. RESULTS: Participants from units with > 3000 deliveries/year scored higher on the test than participants from units with < 1000 deliveries/year (3000-3999 deliveries/year: mean difference 0.8, p < 0.0001; > 4000 deliveries/year: mean difference 0.5, p = 0.006). Participants with < 15 years of work experience scored higher than participants with > 15 years of experience (15-20 years of experience: mean difference - 0.6, p = 0.007; > 20 years experience: mean difference - 0.9, p < 0.0001). No differences were detected concerning professional background. CONCLUSIONS: CTG knowledge, interpretation skills and decision-making measured by a written assessment were positively associated with working in large maternity units and having < 15 years of obstetric work experience. This might indicate a challenge in maintaining CTG skills in small units and among experienced staff but could also reflect different levels of motivation, test familiarity and learning culture. Whether the findings are transferable to the clinical setting was not examined.


Asunto(s)
Cardiotocografía/normas , Competencia Clínica , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Transversales , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Dinamarca , Evaluación Educacional , Femenino , Ginecología/normas , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades Hospitalarias/normas , Unidades Hospitalarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/normas , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Materno-Infantil/normas , Servicios de Salud Materno-Infantil/estadística & datos numéricos , Partería/normas , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/normas , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo
15.
Int Urogynecol J ; 28(3): 409-415, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27539566

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We compared persistence on overactive bladder (OAB) pharmacotherapy in patients treated in the Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) department compared with patients treated in the Internal Medicine (IM) and General Urology (GU) departments within an integrated health-care system. We hypothesized that persistence would be higher among FPMRS patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients with at least one prescription for OAB between January 2003 and July 2014 were identified. Demographic, prescription and treatment specialty data and data on the use of third-line therapies were collected. The primary outcome was persistence, defined as days on continuous pharmacotherapy. Discontinuation was defined as a treatment gap of ≥45 days. Discontinuation-free probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared among the specialties. Predictors of persistence were estimated using logistic regression with adjustment for covariates. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to identify risk associations. RESULTS: A total of 252 subjects were identified. At 12 weeks, 6 months and 1 year, FPMRS patients had the highest persistence rates of 93 %, 87 % and 79 % in contrast to 72 %, 68 % and 50 % in GU patients, and 83 %, 71 % and 63 % in IM patients (p = 0.006, p = 0.007, p = 0.001, respectively). The median persistence in FPMRS patients was 738 days, in GU patients 313 days and in IM patients 486 days (p = 0.006). Of the FPMRS patients, 61 % switched to at least a second medication, as compared to 27 % of IM patients and 14 % of GU patients (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Persistence on OAB pharmacotherapy was higher among FPMRS patients than among GU and IM patients in this community setting. These results suggest that persistence is higher under subspecialist supervision.


Asunto(s)
Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Medicina Interna/estadística & datos numéricos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Urología/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Medicina General , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
Maturitas ; 87: 67-71, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27013290

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previously, the REDLINC VI study showed that the main reason for the low use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) was its low rate of prescription by doctors. OBJECTIVE: To determine the use of MHT and perceived related risks among gynecologists. METHODS: A self-administered and anonymous questionnaire was delivered to certified gynecologists in 11 Latin American countries. RESULTS: A total of 2154 gynecologists were contacted, of whom 85.3% responded to the survey (n = 1837). Mean age was 48.1 ± 11.4 years; 55.5% were male, 20.3% were faculty members and 85% had a partner. Overall, 85.4% of gynecologists responded that they would use MHT if they had menopausal symptoms (81.8% in the case of female gynecologists) or prescribe it to their partner (88.2% in the case of male gynecologists; p < 0.001). Perceived risk related to MHT use (on a scale from 0 to 10) was higher among female than among male gynecologists (4.06 ± 2.09 vs. 3.83 ± 2.11, p < 0.02). The top two perceived reported risks were thromboembolism (women 33.6% vs. men 41.4%, p < 0.009) and breast cancer (women 38.5% vs. men 33.9%, p < 0.03). Overall, gynecologists reported prescribing MHT to 48.9% of their symptomatic patients (women 47.3% vs. men 50.2%, p < 0.03) and 86.8% currently prescribed non-hormonal remedies and 83.8% alternative therapies for the management of the menopause. Gynecologists who were older and academic professionals prescribed MHT more often. CONCLUSION: Although this Latin American survey showed that gynecologists are mostly supporters of MHT use (for themselves or their partners), this is not necessarily reflected in their clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno/estadística & datos numéricos , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Menopausia , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas , Humanos , América Latina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
17.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 25(3): 235-41, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26978124

RESUMEN

Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecologic cancer. Receipt of treatment from a gynecologic oncologist is an evidence-based recommendation to reduce mortality from the disease. We examined knowledge and application of this evidence-based recommendation in primary care physicians as part of CDC gynecologic cancer awareness campaign efforts and discussed results in the context of CDC National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP). We analyzed primary care physician responses to questions about how often they refer patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer to gynecologic oncologists, and reasons for lack of referral. We also analyzed these physicians' knowledge of tests to help determine whether a gynecologic oncologist is needed for a planned surgery. The survey response rate was 52.2%. A total of 84% of primary care physicians (87% of family/general practitioners, 81% of internists and obstetrician/gynecologists) said they always referred patients to gynecologic oncologists for treatment. Common reasons for not always referring were patient preference or lack of gynecologic oncologists in the practice area. A total of 23% of primary care physicians had heard of the OVA1 test, which helps to determine whether gynecologic oncologist referral is needed. Although referral rates reported here are high, it is not clear whether ovarian cancer patients are actually seeing gynecologic oncologists for care. The NCCCP is undertaking several efforts to assist with this, including education of the recommendation among women and providers and assistance with treatment summaries and patient navigation toward appropriate treatment. Expansion of these efforts to all populations may help improve adherence to recommendations and reduce ovarian cancer mortality.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
Forsch Komplementmed ; 22(4): 231-6, 2015.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26228703

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bryophyllum pinnatum has been introduced in anthroposophic medicine in Europe and is nowadays also widely used in conventional medicine. The aim of this study was to assess the prescriptions in the field of gynaecology and obstetrics in Switzerland and to document potential effects and possible adverse events of B. pinnatum. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Private practices and clinics for obstetrics and gynaecology were asked to document each prescription of B. pinnatum for their female patients during 31 months with an online questionnaire. RESULTS: At the University Hospital Zurich, at the Cantonal Hospital Winterthur as well as at 2 private practices, a total of 174 women and 208 prescriptions of B. pinnatum were recorded (several prescriptions per patient were possible). Most of the patients were pregnant (87%). B. pinnatum was prescribed as a tocolytic agent to 83% of all patients and to 95% of all pregnant patients and showed a good or a very good effectiveness. Further, 14% of the patients received B. pinnatum for sedation against their restlessness during the day and 5% for sedation against sleep problems. A decrease of the restlessness was achieved for these 2 indications. 13% of the patients suffered from a hyperactive bladder and in two-thirds of them the effectiveness of the treatment with B. pinnatum was classified as very good. In 92% of the cases, Bryophyllum 50% chewable tablets were prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: In conventional gynaecology and obstetrics, B. pinnatum is predominantly prescribed for pregnant women in case of prematurel abour, against restlessness and for hyperactive bladder. B. pinnatum showed a good effectiveness with a high benefit in the treatment of hyperactivity-associated health problems.


Asunto(s)
Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Kalanchoe/química , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Fitoterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Extractos Vegetales/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Ginecología/tendencias , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Obstetricia/tendencias , Extractos Vegetales/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suiza , Tocolíticos/uso terapéutico
19.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 290(6): 1133-9, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24973867

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Whereas we have some information on complementary medicine in the field of oncology, little is known about complementary medicine in the field of obstetrics and gynaecology especially outside of hospitals. METHODS: All office-based obstetricians and gynaecologists in the state of Hesse, Germany, were contacted and asked to fill in an assessment form regarding cooperation in the field of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), as well as the perceived efficacy of various CAM methods for a number of pathological conditions in the field of obstetrics and gynaecology. RESULTS: It was found that more than half of Hessian office-based obstetricians and gynaecologists had existing cooperation regarding CAM, especially with colleagues, but also midwives, pharmacists, physiotherapists, and health practitioners. The probability of cooperation was significantly inversely associated with age. It was found that the probability for advising CAM differed between various health problems. The following CAM methods were considered reasonable for the treatment of different conditions: phytotherapy for climacteric complaints and premenstrual syndrome; homoeopathy for puerperal problems; acupuncture and traditional Chinese medicine for complaints during pregnancy; and dietary supplements for the side effects of cancer therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis shows that there is much cooperation in the field of CAM. Comparison between physicians' perceived efficacy of CAM methods and objective findings shows that there is a need for the provision of valid information in the field.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Ginecología/métodos , Obstetricia/métodos , Médicos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia por Acupuntura/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Terapias Complementarias/métodos , Femenino , Alemania , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Homeopatía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Visita a Consultorio Médico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
20.
J Healthc Qual ; 36(2): 39-49, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22913302

RESUMEN

Physician shortages and healthcare reform are important topics in the healthcare field today. The utilization of the skills and professional competencies of nonphysician healthcare providers, as well as collaboration between physicians and nonphysician healthcare providers may in part provide a solution to some current healthcare concerns. The purposes of this study were to describe the range of services provided by nonphysician women's healthcare providers (WHCPs), and to begin to explore the collaborative relationship between obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) and WHCPs. Questionnaires were sent to ob-gyns, certified nurse-midwives, certified midwives, nurse practitioners (NPs), and physician's assistants (PAs) with questions regarding the types of services WHCPs provide, as well as collaboration between ob-gyns and WHCPs. Overall, 62.1% of ob-gyns employ WHCPs. NPs are the most common type of WHCP employed in our sample. WHCPs are more likely to be younger than ob-gyns, and an overwhelming majority of WHCPs in our sample are female. Most reported that they are anticipating an expansion in the roles and services they provide over the next 5 years. In an era of healthcare reform, WHCPs may in part provide a solution to the growing physician shortage. Collaboration between ob-gyns and WHCPs is a key aspect of the changing healthcare environment.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud de la Mujer , Conducta Cooperativa , Femenino , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA