RESUMEN
Intense pulsed light (IPL) is a non-laser, high-intensity light source that has been shown to play a valuable role in dermatology and has been adopted in ophthalmology for treating meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). In this review, we discuss the mechanism of action of IPL, including its benefits in ophthalmology. IPL therapy has been shown to improve tear film stability, meibomian gland (MG) function, and subjective symptoms of ocular dryness in MGD patients. Moreover, emerging evidence suggests that IPL therapy is beneficial for other ocular surface diseases, such as blepharitis and chalazia. Hence, it can be inferred that IPL has potential as a therapeutic modality in future applications. Large clinical and experimental trials are needed to exploit the full potential of IPL as a treatment for recurrent chalazia, Sjögren's syndrome, and other causes of dry eye disease (DED). This paper reviews the published literature related to the application of IPL for treating ocular surface diseases.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Ojo Seco , Tratamiento de Luz Pulsada Intensa , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio , Humanos , Tratamiento de Luz Pulsada Intensa/métodos , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/terapia , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/terapia , Blefaritis/terapia , Glándulas TarsalesRESUMEN
Blepharitis is a common ophthalmic condition with multiple etiologies and no definitive, universal treatment. The treatment modalities for managing lid margin diseases vary depending on the disease's cause, location, and severity. For anterior blepharitis, management options include eyelid hygiene with warm compresses, eyelid scrubs, baby shampoo, and over-the-counter eyelid cleansers. Topical antibiotics and antibiotic-steroid combination drops/ointments for the eye and eyelid may accompany these. For posterior blepharitis/meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), at-home warm compress or in-office administration of heat therapy/thermal pulsation treatment that aims to clear obstruction in the meibomian glands and restore meibum secretions to maintain a healthy tear film is recommended. In addition to the above treatment strategies, various other compounds to manage lid margin diseases are in the late stages of development. This review summarizes the available treatment modalities or those in the pipeline for treating blepharitis and MGD.
Asunto(s)
Blefaritis , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio , Humanos , Blefaritis/terapia , Blefaritis/fisiopatología , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/terapia , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/fisiopatología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Glándulas Tarsales/fisiopatología , Medicina Basada en la EvidenciaRESUMEN
Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a leading cause of dry eye disease and one of the most common ophthalmic conditions encountered in eye clinics worldwide. These holocrine glands are situated in the eyelid, where they produce specialized lipids, or meibum, needed to lubricate the eye surface and slow tear film evaporation - functions which are critical to preserving high-resolution vision. MGD results in tear instability, rapid tear evaporation, changes in local microflora, and dry eye disease, amongst other pathological entities. While studies identifying the mechanisms of MGD have generally focused on gland obstruction, we now know that age is a major risk factor for MGD that is associated with abnormal cell differentiation and renewal. It is also now appreciated that immune-inflammatory disorders, such as certain autoimmune diseases and atopy, may trigger MGD, as demonstrated through a T cell-driven neutrophil response. Here, we independently discuss the underlying roles of gland and immune related factors in MGD, as well as the integration of these two distinct mechanisms into a unified perspective that may aid future studies. From this unique standpoint, we propose a revised model in which glandular dysfunction and immunopathogenic pathways are not primary versus secondary contributors in MGD, but are fluid, interactive, and dynamic, which we likened to the Yin and Yang of MGD.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio , Glándulas Tarsales , Lágrimas , Humanos , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/inmunología , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/fisiopatología , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/inmunología , Glándulas Tarsales/inmunología , Glándulas Tarsales/patología , Glándulas Tarsales/metabolismo , Lágrimas/metabolismoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether patients with moderate-to-severe meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) will benefit from increasing the number of intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment sessions. METHODS: Ninety Asian adult with MGD (stages 3-4) were enrolled in this retrospective study. In Group1, 30 patients completed the five-session IPL treatment, 63.33% of which also received meibomian gland expression (MGX). In Group 2, 60 patients received three-session IPL treatment, 60.0% of which also accepted MGX. Both intragroup and intergroup analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The population characteristics, clinical baseline characteristics and therapeutic regimen were comparable between Group1 and Group2. The symptoms and most clinical indices improved after IPL treatment finished in both two groups. No statistical difference was found in any improvement level of all symptomatic and physical indices, including the Ocular surface disease index, tear break-up time, Demodex, corneal staining, meibum quality, meibomian gland expressibility, and MGD stage (all p ≥ 0.05) between the two groups at any time, not only month by month, but also at the terminal visit. However, the response rate of Group1 after the five-session treatment (70.00%) was increased compared to that of Group2 after the three-session treatment (63.33%). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the number of IPL sessions is beneficial for patients with moderate to severe MGD to increase the response rate of treatment, rather than the improvement level. However, there is no need for patients who respond well to a routine number of IPL treatments to undergo additional IPL sessions.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Ojo Seco , Tratamiento de Luz Pulsada Intensa , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio , Adulto , Humanos , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/metabolismo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Glándulas Tarsales/metabolismo , Fototerapia , Lágrimas/metabolismo , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/metabolismoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of meibomian gland expression (MGX) combined with home-based therapy versus home-based therapy alone for the treatment of dry eye disease (DED) caused by meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). METHODS: A systematic review of randomized controlled studies (RCTs), reporting the effects of MGX combined with home-based therapy in 2 databases, PubMed and Web of Science, was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The search period was until August 20, 2023. According to the heterogeneity, a random or fixed effects model was performed in the meta-analysis. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated to analyze dry eye symptoms (DES) score, tear film break-up time (TBUT), total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS) and meibomian glands expressibility (MGE). All analyses were performed by RevMan Web, version 5.7. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to analyze the quality of the studies selected. RESULTS: Two RCTs with a total of 99 patients were included. The studies reported that MGX combined with home-based therapy improves DES score, TBUT, tCFS and MGE compared to the home-based therapy. However, the meta-analysis indicated that MGX combined with home-based therapy only seems to be beneficial in reducing DES score (SMD -0.49; 95 % CI: -0.89 to -0.08; P = 0.02; I2 = 0 %). In addition, although TBUT, tCFS and MGE reported a slight trend in favor of MGX combined with home-based therapy, it was non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: While MGX combined with home-based therapy seem to show some evidence of alleviating dry eye symptoms, there is insufficient evidence to conclude the effects of this treatment definitively particularly in improving dry eye signs caused by MGD, such as TBUT, tCFS and MGE. Therefore, further RCTs are needed to elucidate these results.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Ojo Seco , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio , Glándulas Tarsales , Humanos , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/terapia , Glándulas Tarsales/metabolismo , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/terapia , Lágrimas/metabolismo , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Terapia Combinada , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of optimal pulsed technology (OPT) and meibomian gland massage (MGM) in alleviating the signs and symptoms of contact lens-related meibomian gland dysfunction (CL-MGD). Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled study included 90 patients (180 eyes) diagnosed with CL-MGD and were assigned to the OPT group (n = 60 eyes), MGM group (n = 60 eyes), and control group (n = 60 eyes). All participants were examined at baseline (D0), day 21 (D21), and day 42 (D42) for the ocular surface disease index (OSDI), noninvasive tear break-up time (NITBUT), noninvasive tear meniscus height (NITMH), meibomian gland score (MGS), meibomian gland score (MGYSS), best-corrected visual acuity, and intraocular pressure. Results: The OSDI scores and NITBUT improved after treatment in all the three groups. The OSDI scores in OPT and MGM groups were significantly lower compared with that in the control group at D21 and further decreased at D42. The NITBUT in OPT and MGM groups increased compared with the control group at D21 and further increased at D42, and the NITBUT in OPT group increased compared with the MGM group at D21 and D42. The MGYSS both improved after treatment in the OPT and MGM groups, The MGYSS in OPT and MGM groups decreased compared with the control group at D21 and further decreased at D42, and the MGYSS in the OPT group decreased compared with the MGM group at D21 and D42. The NITMH and MGS had no differences after treatment. Conclusions: Results imply that OPT or MGM treatment can be safely used to relieve symptoms of CL-MGD. In addition, OPT treatment was found to be more effective in improving the general stability of the tear-film in CL-MGD.
Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio , Humanos , Glándulas Tarsales , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , MasajeRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) in the treatment of severe chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease (coGVHD). METHODS: A prospective cohort study. Seventeen patients with severe coGVHD were selected for inclusion in this study. All subjects were treated with IPL every fortnight together with conventional treatment, observation time points were pre-treatment (W0), 4 weeks post-treatment (W4), 8 weeks post-treatment (W8) and 12 weeks post-treatment (W12). Dry eye related examinations include Tear meniscus height (TMH), Non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT), Schirmer I test, Tear film lipid layer thickness (LLT), Ocular surface staining (OSS) and assessment of meibomian gland. Corneal epithelial cell morphology and inflammatory cell infiltration were analyzed by corneal confocal microscopy, while goblet cell density and squamous epithelial grade were assessed by conjunctival imprinted cytology. RESULTS: Patients did not experience any adverse reactions during the follow-up period. All subjects showed significant improvement in clinical symptoms and most signs after IPL treatment. The corneal confocal microscopy showed that the number of dendritic cells infiltrates in the corneal stroma was significantly reduced after IPL treatment (p < 0.001). Conjunctival blot cytology suggested an increase in the number of conjunctival goblet cells from 5.12 ± 2.71 cells/mm2 before treatment to 22.00 ± 4.58 cells/mm2 after treatment, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). An improvement in conjunctival epithelial cell morphology and a decrease in squamous epithelial grade was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: IPL treatment can effectively increase tear film stability in patients with severe coGVHD without significant side effects.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Síndromes de Ojo Seco , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Tratamiento de Luz Pulsada Intensa , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Glándulas Tarsales , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/etiología , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/terapia , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/diagnóstico , LágrimasRESUMEN
Background: Dry eye disease (DED) is a complex ocular surface inflammatory disorder with a multifactorial etiology. Therapies such as intense pulsed light (IPL) and heated eye mask (HEM) have been reported to improve the tear film lipid layer (TFLL) and signs and symptoms of DED. Methods: This randomized study aimed to compare the effects of IPL combined with HEM (IPL+HEM) group, IPL group, and control group in participants with evaporative DED. All participants were examined at baseline (D0), day 21 (D21), day 42 (D42), and day 84 (D84) for noninvasive tear breakup time (NITBUT), TFLL, corneal conjunctival staining (CS), meibomian gland quality (MGQ), meibomian gland expressibility (MGEx), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Results: The mean age of participants was IPL+HEM: 28.06 ± 3.88 years, IPL: 29.88 ± 4.68 years, and control: 28.52 ± 3.77 years. At D84, significant improvements in TFLL (p < 0.05), noninvasive tear breakup time (NITBUT) (p < 0.05), corneoconjunctival staining (CS) (p < 0.05), MGQ (p < 0.05), MGEx (p < 0.05), and OSDI (p < 0.05) were found in the IPL+HEM and IPL groups, whereas the control group had no significant improvements. Furthermore, ΔTFLL significantly correlated with ΔNITBUT (r = -0.678, p < 0.001), ΔCS (r = 0.321, p < 0.001), ΔMGQ (r = 0.669, p < 0.001), ΔMGEx (r = 0.598, p < 0.001), and ΔOSDI score (r = 0.649, p < 0.001). Conclusions: IPL therapy in combination with HEM and IPL therapy only can significantly improve the quality of TFLL and clinically reduce the sign and symptoms of evaporative DED. However, IPL therapy in combination with HEM was found to be more effective than IPL therapy alone.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Ojo Seco , Tratamiento de Luz Pulsada Intensa , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Glándulas Tarsales , Lágrimas , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/radioterapia , LípidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical efficacy on improving the quality of meibum in patients suffer from dry eye disease (DED) due to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) with hyperactivity ofdue todeficiency pattern after being treated with Pinggan Yuyin Qingre formula (, PGYYQR). METHODS: Totally 120 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included and stratified into three levels according to the level of MGD (1-3), and patients in each level was randomly allocated into the treatment group and control group according to a 1â¶1 ratio. Both groups were treated with sodium hyaluronate eye drops, and the treatment group was also given PGYYQR granules. Both groups were treated continuously for eight weeks. The score of the properties of meibomian gland (MG) secretion, the score of the palpebral margins, the average noninvasive tear breakup time (NITBUTav), lipid layer thickness (LLT), and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) syndrome efficacy were compared between the two groups after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 116 cases were included in the statistical analysis. The differences were statistically significant in the score of the properties of MG secretion, the score of the palpebral margins, and NITBUTav between the two groups after treatment, the treatment group was superior to the control group; there was no evidence of a difference in LLT. In terms of TCM syndrome efficacy, the total effective rate was 84.7% in the treatment group and 50.9% in the control group, with the statistically significant difference. None of the included cases had adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: PGYYQR is effective in improving the quality of meibum, and the tear film stability which thereby relieving the ocular symptoms in MGD-related DED patients with hyperactivity ofdue todeficiency pattern.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Ojo Seco , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio , Humanos , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/tratamiento farmacológico , Glándulas Tarsales , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , LágrimasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The effect of skin lipids on the formation and stability of the human tear film was investigated. METHODS: Skin swab substances (SSSs) were applied to the eyes of volunteers and studied using fluorescein or with TearView, which records infrared emissivity showing tear film integrity in real time. Results were compared with similar experiments using castor oil, freshly collected meibum, or acetic acid, which simulated the low pH of the skin. RESULTS: Fluorescein and TearView results were comparable. TearView showed the natural unaltered tear film over the whole eye, instant changes to the tear film, and meibomian gland activity. Minimal amounts of SSS destroyed the integrity of the film and caused pain. Corneal epithelial damage could be detected. TearView showed that SSS stimulated meibomian gland secretion if applied directly to the posterior eyelid margin. Excess meibum had no effect on the tear film spread or integrity. Castor oil formed floating lenses on the tear film which were spread by a blink but then condensed back toward themselves. There was no pain or surface damage with these oils. CONCLUSIONS: SSS contamination of the ocular surface disrupts the tear film, causes stinging, and fluorescein staining of the corneal epithelial cells after a blink. SSS stimulates meibomian gland activity. It is possible that various ocular conditions associated with dry eye, such as blepharitis and ocular rosacea, may compromise a meibomian lipid barrier of the eye lid margin. Skin lipids would then have access to the ocular surface and cause dry eye symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Ojo Seco , Laceraciones , Humanos , Lágrimas/química , Aceite de Ricino/análisis , Aceite de Ricino/farmacología , Glándulas Tarsales , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/etiología , Fluoresceína/farmacologíaRESUMEN
We assessed the effectiveness of light-guided-tip intense pulsed light (IPL) with meibomian gland expression (MGX) in chalazion treatment. Ninety-five eyes with chalazion received a light-guided-tip IPL-MGX treatment (IPL-MGX group), and another 95 eyes with chalazion received incision with curettage treatment (Control group). Prior to IPL or incision, as well as 1 month after the final treatment, data were gathered pertaining to the lesion location and size, hyperemia, lesions regression or recurrence, and a comprehensive ophthalmic examination. The total size of the chalazia in the IPL-MGX group was significantly reduced after the final treatment, with an average resolution rate of 70.5%, which is comparable to excision surgery. A significant decrease in chalazion recurrence rate was apparent after treatment in the IPL-MGX group compared with control. Moreover, the IPL-MGX demonstrated significant advancements throughout noninvasive tear film breakup time (NIBUT) as well as meibum grade in comparison to baseline and those in the the Control group. The use of IPL-MGX was found to be an efficient therapy for reducing the size and recurring frequency of chalazia, as well as for improving the meibomian gland function. It may be considered as a first-line treatment for cases of primary or recurrent chalazia with inflammation.
Asunto(s)
Ascomicetos , Chalazión , Síndromes de Ojo Seco , Tratamiento de Luz Pulsada Intensa , Humanos , Chalazión/terapia , Chalazión/metabolismo , Glándulas Tarsales/metabolismo , Fototerapia , Lágrimas/metabolismo , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/metabolismoRESUMEN
This study reviewed the efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light (IPL) for the treatment of dry eye disease (DED). The PubMed database was used to conduct the literature search, which used the keywords "intense pulsed light" and "dry eye disease". After the authors evaluated the articles for relevancy, 49 articles were reviewed. In general, all treatment modalities were proven to be clinically effective in reducing dry eye (DE) signs and symptoms; however, the level of improvement and persistence of outcomes differed amongst them. Meta-analysis indicated significant improvement in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores post-treatment with a standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.63; confidence interval (CI): -2.42 to -0.84. Moreover, a meta-analysis indicated a significant improvement in tear break-up time (TBUT) test values with SMD = 1.77; CI: 0.49 to 3.05. Research suggests that additive therapies, such as meibomian gland expression (MGX), sodium hyaluronate eye drops, heated eye mask, warm compress, lid hygiene, lid margin scrub, eyelid massage, antibiotic drops, cyclosporine drops, omega-3 supplements, steroid drops, and warm compresses along with IPL, have been found to work in tandem for greater effectiveness; however, in clinical practice, its feasibility and cost-effectiveness have to be taken into consideration. Current findings suggest that IPL therapy is suitable when lifestyle modifications such as reducing or eliminating the use of contact lenses, lubricating eye drops/gels, and warm compresses/eye masks fail to improve signs and symptoms of DE. Moreover, patients with compliance issues have been shown to benefit well as the effects of IPL therapy is sustained for over several months. DED is a multifactorial disorder, and IPL therapy has been found to be safe and efficient in reducing its signs and symptoms of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)-related DE. Although the treatment protocol varies among authors, current findings suggest that IPL has a positive effect on the signs and symptoms of MGD-related DE. However, patients in the early stages can benefit more from IPL therapy. Moreover, IPL has a better maintenance impact when used in conjunction with other traditional therapies. Further research is needed to assess cost-utility analysis for IPL.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Ojo Seco , Tratamiento de Luz Pulsada Intensa , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio , Humanos , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/terapia , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/metabolismo , Tratamiento de Luz Pulsada Intensa/métodos , Glándulas Tarsales/metabolismo , Lágrimas/metabolismoRESUMEN
Evaporative dry eye (EDE) due to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is one of the common clinical problems encountered in ophthalmology. It is a major cause of dry eye disease (DED) and of ocular morbidity. In EDE, inadequate quantity or quality of lipids produced by the meibomian glands leads to faster evaporation of the preocular tear film and symptoms and signs of DED. Although the diagnosis is made using a combination of clinical features and special diagnostic test results, the management of the disease might be challenging as it is often difficult to distinguish EDE from other subtypes of DED. This is critical because the approach to the treatment of DED is guided by identifying the underlying subtype and cause. The traditional treatment of MGD consists of warm compresses, lid massage, and improving lid hygiene, all measures aimed at relieving glandular obstruction and facilitating meibum outflow. In recent years, newer diagnostic imaging modalities and therapies for EDE like vectored thermal pulsation and intense pulsed light therapy have emerged. However, the multitude of management options may confuse the treating ophthalmologist, and a customized rather than a generalized approach is necessary for these patients. This review aims to provide a simplified approach to diagnose EDE due to MGD and to individualize treatment for each patient. The review also emphasizes the role of lifestyle modifications and appropriate counseling so that patients can have realistic expectations and enjoy a better quality of life.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Ojo Seco , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio , Humanos , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/diagnóstico , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Glándulas Tarsales , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/etiología , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/terapia , LágrimasRESUMEN
Purpose: This randomized, controlled, blinded study evaluates the efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy with low-level light therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and evaporative dry eye (EDE) compared to a control group. Methods: Hundred patients with MGD and EDE were randomized into control (50 subjects, 100 eyes) and study group (50 subjects, 100 eyes). The study group underwent three sittings of IPL with LLLT 15 days apart and were followed up 1 month and 2 months after the last treatment sitting. The control group underwent sham treatment and was followed up at the same intervals. The patients were evaluated at baseline and 1 month and 3 months (post 1st treatment) for dry eye. Schirmer's test and tear breakup time (TBUT), OSDI, meibomian gland expression, and meibography. Results: The study group showed significant improvement in OSDI scores (P < 0.0001) compared to the control group and a significant improvement in TBUT (P < 0.005) compared to the control group. There was no change in schirmer's test and an improvement in the meibomian gland expression but not significant. Conclusion: The results show that a combined therapy of IPL with LLT is effective in treating MGD with EDE compared to controls, and repeated treatment sessions have a cumulative effect on the disease outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Ojo Seco , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio , Humanos , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/diagnóstico , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/terapia , Glándulas Tarsales/metabolismo , Fototerapia/métodos , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/terapia , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/metabolismo , Lágrimas/metabolismoRESUMEN
Our study compared treatment efficacy between cut-off and notch filters in intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) through a prospective, randomized paired-eye trial. Additionally, the efficacy of IPL treatment alone was investigated by restricting other conventional treatments. One eye was randomly selected for an acne filter and the other for a 590-nm filter. Identical four regimens of IPL treatments were administered. The tear break-up time (TBUT), Oxford scale, Sjögren's International Clinical Collaborative Alliance (SICCA) staining score, tear matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) expression, tear osmolarity, and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaires were evaluated before and after IPL. Meibomian gland (MG) parameters were measured. When combining the results from both filters, the TBUT, SICCA staining score, OSDI score, and upper and lower lid meibum expressibility were improved after IPL. No significant differences were found between the two filters in the TBUT, Oxford scale, SICCA staining score, MMP-9 expression, tear osmolarity, and MG parameters. Although not significant, the acne filter showed better treatment efficacy than that in the 590-nm filter. IPL alone is efficacious in terms of ocular surface parameters, MG function, and subjective symptoms. Regarding filter selection, both acne and 590-nm filters are promising options for MGD treatment.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Síndromes de Ojo Seco , Tratamiento de Luz Pulsada Intensa , Laceraciones , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio , Humanos , Tratamiento de Luz Pulsada Intensa/métodos , Metaloproteinasa 9 de la Matriz/metabolismo , Estudios Prospectivos , Glándulas Tarsales/metabolismo , Acné Vulgar/metabolismo , Lágrimas/metabolismo , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To evaluate changes in objective optical quality following intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment combined with meibomian gland (MG) expression (MGX) in patients with MG dysfunction (MGD). METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included MGD-related dry eye disease (DED) patients who received IPL treatment between March and December 2021 at Kim's Eye Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Each patient underwent four sessions of IPL treatment using Lumenis M22 (Lumenis Ltd., Yokneam, Israel) and MGX at three-week intervals. RESULTS: This study included 90 eyes from 45 patients with MGD. The mean age was 52.3 ± 16.1 years (range, 20-75 years), and 53.3% (24/45) of patients were female. Compared with the baseline, all clinical symptoms and signs significantly improved after IPL treatment combined with MGX. All optical quality parameters obtained with an optical quality analysis system (OQAS: Visiometrics, Castelldefels, Spain) have improved significantly over the baseline (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MGD, IPL treatment combined with MGX improved the objective optical quality and clinical signs and symptoms of DED.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Ojo Seco , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Glándulas Tarsales/diagnóstico por imagen , Glándulas Tarsales/metabolismo , Fototerapia , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/metabolismo , Lágrimas/metabolismoRESUMEN
Objective: To evaluate relevant clinical outcomes and conclude possible mechanisms of intense pulsed light (IPL) in eyelid inflammation. Background: IPL devices were primarily applied in cutaneous vascular malformations and have been used in ocular diseases for about 20 years, mostly including meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), blepharitis, and ocular rosacea. Recent findings: Seventy-two original clinical researches were included, 57 for MGD, 4 for blepharitis or blepharitis-related keratoconjunctivitis, and 11 for rosacea. Dry eye symptoms, (tear) break-up time (BUT), and meibomian structure and/or functions were improved in most patients, but production of reactive oxygen species is an important link in the photobiomodulation mediated by IPL, which can influence numerous signal pathways to achieve anti-inflammatory, anti-infective, and prodifferentiation effects. Conclusions: The evidence suggests that IPL is an effective therapeutic tool for most patients with MGD, but more clinical evidence is needed for other indications.
Asunto(s)
Blefaritis , Enfermedades de los Párpados , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio , Rosácea , Humanos , Glándulas Tarsales , Enfermedades de los Párpados/terapia , Blefaritis/radioterapia , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/terapia , Fototerapia , Rosácea/radioterapiaRESUMEN
Dry eye disease is a complex ophthalmic disorder that consists of two main subtypes, aqueous deficient dry eye (ADDE) and evaporative dry eye disease (EDED). Due to the complex underlying physiology, human dry eye disease can be difficult to model in laboratory animal species. Thus, the identification and characterization of a spontaneous large animal model of dry eye disease is desirable. Dogs have been described as an ideal spontaneous model of ADDE due to the similar pathophysiology between dogs and humans. Recently, EDED and meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) have been increasingly recognized and reported in dogs. These reports on EDED and MGD in dogs have identified similarities in pathophysiology, clinical presentations, and diagnostic parameters to humans with the comparable disorders. Additionally, the tests that are used to diagnose EDED and MGD in humans are more easily applicable to dogs than to laboratory species due to the comparable globe sizes between dogs and humans. The reported response of dogs to EDED and MGD therapies are similar to humans, suggesting that they would be a valuable preclinical model for the development of additional therapeutics. Further research and clinical awareness of EDED and MGD in dogs would increase their ability to be utilized as a preclinical model, improving the positive predictive value of therapeutics for EDED and MGD in both humans and dogs.