The effects of overnight nutrient intake on hypothalamic inflammation in a free-choice diet-induced obesity rat model.

Consumption of fat and sugar induces hyperphagia and increases the prevalence of obesity and diabetes type 2. Low-grade inflammation in the hypothalamus, a key brain area involved in the regulation of energy homeostasis is shown to blunt signals of satiety after long term high fat diet. The fact that this mechanism can be activated after a few days of hyperphagia before apparent obesity is present led to our hypothesis that hypothalamic inflammation is induced with fat and sugar consumption. Here, we used a free-choice high-fat high-sugar (fcHFHS) diet-induced obesity model and tested the effects of differential overnight nutrient intake during the final experimental night on markers of hypothalamic inflammation. Male Wistar rats were fed a control diet or fcHFHS diet for one week, and assigned to three different feeding conditions during the final experimental night: 1) fcHFHS-fed, 2) fed a controlled amount of chow diet, or 3) fasted. RT-qPCR and Western blot were utilized to measure hypothalamic gene and protein expression, of cytokines and intermediates of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) pathway. Lastly, we investigated the effects of acute fat intake on markers of hypothalamic inflammation in fat-naïve rats. fcHFHS-fed rats consumed more calories, increased adipose tissue, and showed elevated expression of hypothalamic inflammation markers (increased phosphorylation of NF-κB protein, Nfkbia and Il6 gene expression) compared to chow-fed rats. These effects were evident in rats consuming relative high amounts of fat. Removal of the fat and sugar, or fasting, during the final experimental night ameliorated hypothalamic inflammation. Finally, a positive correlation was observed between overnight acute fat consumption and hypothalamic NF-κB phosphorylation in fat-naïve rats. Our data indicate that one week of fcHFHS diet, and especially the fat component, promotes hypothalamic inflammation, and removal of the fat and sugar component reverses these detrimental effects.

Reduced reward-driven eating accounts for the impact of a mindfulness-based diet and exercise intervention on weight loss: Data from the SHINE randomized controlled trial.

Many individuals with obesity report over eating despite intentions to maintain or lose weight. Two barriers to long-term weight loss are reward-driven eating, which is characterized by a lack of control over eating, a preoccupation with food, and a lack of satiety; and psychological stress. Mindfulness training may address these barriers by promoting awareness of hunger and satiety cues, self-regulatory control, and stress reduction. We examined these two barriers as potential mediators of weight loss in the Supporting Health by Integrating Nutrition and Exercise (SHINE) randomized controlled trial, which compared the effects of a 5.5-month diet and exercise intervention with or without mindfulness training on weight loss among adults with obesity. Intention-to-treat multiple mediation models tested whether post-intervention reward-driven eating and psychological stress mediated the impact of intervention arm on weight loss at 12- and 18-months post-baseline among 194 adults with obesity (BMI: 30-45). Mindfulness (relative to control) participants had significant reductions in reward-driven eating at 6 months (post-intervention), which, in turn, predicted weight loss at 12 months. Post-intervention reward-driven eating mediated 47.1% of the total intervention arm effect on weight loss at 12 months [ß = -0.06, SE(ß) = 0.03, p = .030, 95% CI (-0.12, -0.01)]. This mediated effect was reduced when predicting weight loss at 18 months (p = .396), accounting for 23.0% of the total intervention effect, despite similar weight loss at 12 months. Psychological stress did not mediate the effect of intervention arm on weight loss at 12 or 18 months. In conclusion, reducing reward-driven eating, which can be achieved using a diet and exercise intervention that includes mindfulness training, may promote weight loss (clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT00960414).

Position of the American Dietetic Association: nutrition intervention in the treatment of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and eating disorders not otherwise specified (EDNOS).

More than 5 million Americans suffer from eating disorders. Five percent of females and 1% of males have anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or binge eating disorder. It is estimated that 85% of eating disorders have their onset during the adolescent age period. Although Eating Disorders fall under the category of psychiatric diagnoses, there are a number of nutritional and medical problems and issues that require the expertise of a registered dietitian. Because of the complex biopsychosocial aspects of eating disorders, the optimal assessment and ongoing management of these conditions appears to be with an interdisciplinary team consisting of professionals from medical, nursing, nutritional, and mental health disciplines (1). Medical Nutrition Therapy provided by a registered dietitian trained in the area of eating disorders plays a significant role in the treatment and management of eating disorders. The registered dietitian, however, must understand the complexities of eating disorders such as comorbid illness, medical and psychological complications, and boundary issues. The registered dietitian needs to be aware of the specific populations at risk for eating disorders and the special considerations when dealing with these individuals.

Nutrition management and dietary treatment of bulimia.

Bulimia is a complex disorder that requires a multifaceted treatment approach. Treatment for bulimia, as for anorexia nervosa, is often difficult and challenging. Treatment approaches have been limited, and no single approach has emerged as a treatment of choice. This article presents one method for treating bulimic patients, emphasizing a multidisciplinary treatment team and an individualized treatment plan.