Patterns of symptoms in women after gynecologic surgery.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To explore patterns of symptoms over time and the relationships between selected demographic and clinical characteristics. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of longitudinal data. SETTING: A hospital and comprehensive cancer center in the northeastern United States. SAMPLE: 66 women with gynecologic cancers, postsurgical, and scheduled to receive chemotherapy. METHODS: A secondary analysis using descriptive and general estimating equation statistical procedures was conducted on symptom and disease data in a subset of a larger nursing intervention study. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Demographic and clinical variables including cancer site, new diagnosis or recurrence, stage, treatment, comorbidities, emotional distress, use of a symptom management tool kit, and 10 symptoms over time. FINDINGS: Two patterns of symptoms were identified. The first pattern (pain, bowel dysfunction, disturbed sleep, depression, nausea, and lack of appetite) decreased, and the second pattern (fatigue, anxiety, hair loss, and numbness) remained constant over time. The total number of symptoms decreased over time. Factors associated with symptoms, such as the use of a tool kit and emotional distress, were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Tool kit use by women who experienced fatigue, bowel dysfunction, and anxiety suggests its usefulness as a self-care guide. Explanations for the two patterns of symptoms are discussed. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Postsurgical management should include management and monitoring of symptoms associated with treatment. Screening for emotional distress is recommended in this population. Use of the tool kit could be an effective postsurgical management strategy for women with gynecologic cancers.

Quantification of patient fears regarding dental injections and patient perceptions of a local noninjectable anesthetic gel.

Data have shown that 30% of all Americans do not seek dental care and/or treatment unless a problem arises that causes them severe pain. Similar study results have been found in Europe as well. While some studies indicate that cost concerns prevent people from seeking dental care, the fear of pain has been identified as a factor in keeping people from seeing a dentist. A random sample of US and European patients who had recently undergone a scaling and root planing procedure was surveyed via telephone interview to quantify data on patient concerns and fears regarding anesthesia administered by injection, as well as to determine patient interest and price perception of an anesthetic gel product. The survey also provided data on the patient's experience and perception about the scaling and root planing procedure. Responses from the study population showed that patients find the injection painful and do not like the prolonged numbness. Additionally, based on the patients surveyed, they experience injection anxiety before appointments, and a significant number of them cancel appointments or simply do not seek treatment because they are afraid of the injection. Finally, the study also demonstrated that, while not eliminating dental anxiety completely, the availability of a new noninjectable anesthetic would assist in relieving patient fear, with almost half of the patients surveyed being more likely to seek treatment if only the new noninjectable anesthetic was used. Additionally, most patients surveyed would be willing to pay for the noninjectable anesthetic out of their own pockets if it was not covered by their health insurance.

Hypnotic hypo- and hyperalgesia: divergent effects on pain ratings and pain-related cerebral potentials.

Pain ratings and pain-related cerebral potentials in response to noxious stimuli were investigated under hypnotic hypo- or hyperalgesia. Out of a sample of 50 subjects the 10 most highly hypnotizable were selected using the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale. Phasic pain was induced by brief electrical stimuli intracutaneously applied to the subject's left middle finger. The subjects took part in three experimental sessions. The first session was without hypnosis for familiarization with the experimental surroundings. In the two other sessions, the subjects were hypnotized and given a suggestion of analgesia or hyperalgesia with respect to pain sensation in the left hand. The sequence of hypnosis was matched within and between sessions. Pain ratings and late cerebral somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) were used to quantify pain reactions. In addition, auditory evoked potentials (AEP) and spontaneous EEG were evaluated to differentiate between pain-specific and unspecific effects of hypnosis. Only the subjects' verbal reports of pain were drastically influenced by hypnosis: suggestion of analgesia diminished the mean pain ratings, suggestion of hyperalgesia enhanced them (P < 0.001). In contrast, the amplitudes of the late somatosensory potentials evoked by the pain-inducing stimuli were not modified in either of the suggestive states. Furthermore, no effects of hypnosis were found on AEPs and on the power spectra of the spontaneous EEG. The results are discussed on the basis of a dissociation of sensory and affective components of pain under hypnosis.