Day hospital and psychosocial care center: Expanding the discussion of partial hospitalization in mental health.

INTRODUCTION: Since the second half of the twentieth century the discussions about mental patient care reveal ongoing debate between two health care paradigms: the biomedical/biopsychosocial paradigm and the psychosocial paradigm. The struggle for hegemony over the forms of care, on how to deal optimally with the experience of becoming ill is underpinned by an intentionality of reorganizing knowledge about the health/disease dichotomy, which is reflected in the models proposed for the implementation of actions and services for the promotion, prevention, care and rehabilitation of human health. OBJECTIVE: To discuss the guidelines of care in mental health day hospitals (MHDH) in contrast to type III psychosocial care centers (CAPS III). METHOD: Review of mental health legislation from 1990 to 2014. RESULTS: A definition of therapeutic project could not be found, as well as which activities and techniques should be employed by these health services. CONCLUSION: The MHDH and PCC III are services that replace psychiatric hospital admission and are characterized by their complementarity in the care to the mentally ill. Due to their varied and distinctive intervention methods, which operate synergistically, the contributions from both models of care are optimized. Discussions on the best mental health care model reveal polarization between the biomedical/biopsychosocial and psychosocial paradigms. This reflects the supremacy of the latter over the former in the political-ideological discourse that circumscribes the reform of psychiatric care, which may hinder a better clinical outcome for patients and their families.

Conciliación de la medicación: desde el ingreso hasta la atención primaria / Medication reconciliation: from admission to primary care

Objetivos. Implementar un circuito de conciliación de la medicación interniveles, integral y multidisciplinar en una organización sanitaria integrada. Medir las discrepancias detectadas en cada uno de los pasos estudiados. Método. Estudio de intervención, prospectivo y de un año de duración. La medicación se concilió en 3 momentos distintos del paso del paciente por el sistema sanitario: al ingreso en el hospital, al alta y cuando el paciente acudió a su médico de Atención Primaria. Se recogieron y resolvieron las discrepancias detectadas cada vez que se concilió la medicación, y se cuantificó el número total de medicamentos antes y después de cada proceso de conciliación. Resultados. Entre el 1 de noviembre de 2013 y el 30 de octubre de 2014 se concilió la medicación a 77 pacientes, 63% hombres, con una media de edad de 69,5 años. La media de discrepancias por paciente fue de 7,85 al ingreso, 3,67 al alta y 2,19 en Atención Primaria. Conclusiones. Este programa de conciliación de la medicación, además de detectar y resolver las discrepancias, ha sido un punto de partida para establecer nuevas vías de comunicación entre los diferentes profesionales sanitarios que han intervenido en el programa y difundir la cultura de seguridad dentro de la organización (AU)

Objectives. To implement a medication reconciliation circuit of inter-level, comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach in an integrated health organization. To measure the discrepancies detected in each of the steps studied. Method. A prospective intervention study of one-year duration. The medication is reconciled at admission to the hospital, at discharge and when the patient goes to his Primary Care physician. The number and type of discrepancies detected each time the medication is reconciled are collected and resolved, as well as the total number of drugs before and after each reconciliation process quantified. Results. Between November 1, 2013 and October 31, 2014 the medication had been reconciled to 77 patients, 63% male, mean age 69,5 years. Mean admission discrepancy per patient was 7,85, 3,67 at discharge and 2,19 at Primary Care. Conclusions. This program of medication reconciliation, in addition to detect and resolve discrepancies, has been a starting point for establishing new channels of communication between the different health professionals who have participated in the program and disseminate the safety culture within the organization (AU)

Day hospital and psychosocial care center: Expanding the discussion of partial hospitalization in mental health / Hospital-dia e Centro de Atenção Psicossocial: ampliando o debate da internação parcial em saúde mental

Summary Introduction: Since the second half of the twentieth century the discussions about mental patient care reveal ongoing debate between two health care paradigms: the biomedical/biopsychosocial paradigm and the psychosocial paradigm. The struggle for hegemony over the forms of care, on how to deal optimally with the experience of becoming ill is underpinned by an intentionality of reorganizing knowledge about the health/disease dichotomy, which is reflected in the models proposed for the implementation of actions and services for the promotion, prevention, care and rehabilitation of human health. Objective: To discuss the guidelines of care in mental health day hospitals (MHDH) in contrast to type III psychosocial care centers (CAPS III). Method: Review of mental health legislation from 1990 to 2014. Results: A definition of therapeutic project could not be found, as well as which activities and techniques should be employed by these health services. Conclusion: The MHDH and PCC III are services that replace psychiatric hospital admission and are characterized by their complementarity in the care to the mentally ill. Due to their varied and distinctive intervention methods, which operate synergistically, the contributions from both models of care are optimized. Discussions on the best mental health care model reveal polarization between the biomedical/biopsychosocial and psychosocial paradigms. This reflects the supremacy of the latter over the former in the political-ideological discourse that circumscribes the reform of psychiatric care, which may hinder a better clinical outcome for patients and their families.

Resumo Introdução: desde a segunda metade do século XX, as discussões em torno da assistência ao doente mental revelam o debate, ainda inacabado, entre dois paradigmas de atenção à saúde: o paradigma biomédico/biopsicossocial e o paradigma psicossocial. A luta pela hegemonia sobre as formas do cuidado, sobre a melhor maneira de lidar com a experiência do adoecimento, subjaz a uma intencionalidade de reorganização dos saberes sobre o binômio saúde/doença, que se reflete nos modelos propostos para a execução das ações e serviços de promoção, prevenção, assistência e reabilitação da saúde humana. Objetivo: problematizar as diretrizes do cuidado do Hospital-dia em Saúde Mental (HDSM) em contraste com o Centro de Atenção Psicossocial tipo III (CAPS III). Método: revisão da legislação em saúde mental entre 1990-2014. Resultados: não foi encontradas a definição de projeto terapêutico e as atividades e técnicas que devem ser empregadas por esses serviços de saúde. Conclusão: o HDSM e o CAPS III são serviços substitutivos à internação hospitalar psiquiátrica que se caracterizam pela complementaridade na atenção ao doente mental. Pelos seus variados e distintos métodos de intervenção, em ação sinérgica, potencializam-se com as contribuições tanto de um modelo quanto do outro modelo de atenção. As discussões em torno do melhor modelo de atenção em saúde mental mostram-se polarizadas entre os paradigmas biomédico/biopsicossocial e psicossocial, condição que reflete a supremacia do segundo sobre o primeiro no discurso político-ideológico que circunscreve a reforma da assistência psiquiátrica, fato que pode prejudicar o desfecho clínico para o paciente e sua família.

[Acute inpatient multimodal pain therapy and rehabilitation: Framework conditions, tasks and differentiated patient allocation]. / Akutstationäre multimodale Schmerztherapie und Rehabilitation: Rahmenbedingungen, Aufgaben und differenzierte Patientenzuweisung.

Multimodal pain treatment programs are widely accepted as the medical treatment standard in the management of patients with chronic pain syndromes. The concepts and treatment strategies are based on the biopsychosocial model of pain and programs for early restoration of function. Although this concept is primarily implemented in the curative field, i.e. in hospitals for the treatment of patients with chronic pain diseases, modified programs based on the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) can now also be found in rehabilitation clinics. Despite the assumed similarities, significant differences in, for example the aims of the therapy and relevant structural and process variables have to be kept in mind when allocating patients to a program as provided by a hospital or a rehabilitation clinic. The aim of this article is to present the framework structures of both treatment levels with respect to the implementation of multimodal pain therapy programs and to elucidate the differential diagnostic approach to the indications.

Conhecimento dos profissionais da saúde acerca dos direitos da criança e do adolescente hospitalizados / Knowledge of health professionals about the rights of children and adolescents hospitalized

Objetivo: caracterizar os profissionais da saúde envolvidos na assistência a criança e adolescentehospitalizado. Método: estudo exploratório e descritivo, com abordagem quantitativa e qualitativa realizadocom nove profissionais da saúde de um hospital público pediátrico da cidade de João Pessoa/PB através de umquestionário contendo questões objetivas e subjetivas. Os dados objetivos foram agrupados e apresentadosem números absolutos e percentuais e os subjetivos analisados por meio da Técnica do Discurso do SujeitoColetivo. O projeto de pesquisa foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa, CAAC no01250351000-11.Resultados: a maioria dos direitos é desconhecida dos profissionais, porém a maioria referiu que estes eramrespeitados naquela instituição, apesar da falta de brinquedoteca, de visita aberta, de acompanhante na UTIe de capacitação dos profissionais para prestar uma assistência holística. Conclusão: para se prestar aassistência de qualidade as crianças e adolescentes hospitalizados, é necessário o envolvimento tanto daequipe da saúde quanto dos gestores.

[Psychiatric polypharmacy: hazard through drug-drug-interaction and possibilities for prevention]. / Psychiatrische Polypharmazie: Risiken durch Arzneimittel-wechselwirkungen und mögliche Vermeidungsstrategien.

Psychiatric diseases and comorbidity have increased over the past years. Commonly used psychotropic drugs contain a high risk of drug interactions and adverse drug events (ADE). With a frequency of 10-12% psychotropic drugs are, among all pharmaceuticals, the most common cause of hospitalisation due to ADE. During a hospital stay the application of psychotropic drugs can also lead to adverse drug events--sometimes due to drug interactions. Currently, ADEs and drug interactions are the most frequent cause of death for in-patients (18% of all causes of death) with an overall mortality of 0.95%. As studies have shown, hospitals as well as insurers could save a considerable amount of resources by implementing a system with on-ward pharmacists, hereby reducing ADE and re-hospitalisation rates. In recent studies a large amount of current ADEs were rated as preventable. Patient impairment due to ADE is leading to an increase in liability cases with an expected 5% increase of compensation payments in 2011. To evaluate these ADE-related cases, a pharmaceutical assessment should be included in the expert trials, especially since a lack of awareness of medication errors is prevalent. When aiming towards a successful drug therapy, physicians must also consider that cheaper substances may often have an unfavourable drug interaction profile.

[Indication criteria for stationary psychosomatic treatment]. / Kriterien zur Indikation einer stationären psychosomatischen Behandlung (I).

In consideration of the existing possibilities in Germany, the author discusses the indication criteria and the duration of stationary psychosomatic treatment. Aside from the general criteria for hospitalisation, the traditional bio-psycho-social model of illness is emphasized as an important basic principle, to include social factors in the indication criteria for stationary psychosomatic treatment. Adjacent, backgrounds for the decision between a regional and a regionally distant treatment are proposed.

[Inadmissible cooperation contract between hospital and physician. New court decision confirms criticism of the previous practice]. / Unzulässiger Kooperationsvertrag zwischen Krankenhaus und Arzt. Neues Urteil bestätigt Kritik an Zuweisermodell.

The decision of the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf from 01.09.2009 (20 U 121/08), given below in parts, confirms the decision of the Regional Court Duisburg from 01.04.2008 (4 O 300/07) published in Der Urologe issue 10.2008 (1355 ff). The hope expressed in the literature (e.g. Wienke/Janke, OM 4-2009, 461) that the decision of the Regional Court Duisburg would not be upheld on appeal, proved to be unwarranted.

[Improper cooperation contract between a hospital and a physician]. / Unzulässiger Kooperationsvertrag zwischen Krankenhaus und Arzt.

The term interdisciplinary care is frequently used to indicate the often criticized division between inpatient and outpatient treatment. Interdisciplinary care in the actual sense in the form of integrated care necessarily requires the involvement of health insurance providers as the contractual partner.

Sexual predators.

Social responses to sex-offending behaviors have included criminal sanctions and clinical interventions that have evolved over time. These developments have created various challenges for mental health professionals charged with providing care to offenders, particularly when legislative expectations have exceeded available treatments. A summary is provided of recent clinical developments in assessments, therapies, and pharmacology. The usefulness of SRIs, in particular, may prompt the involvement of more psychiatrists in this treatment. Other implications for future practice of these clinical and legal developments are also discussed.