Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 474(3): 677-83, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26013153

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Long-term survival for all patients with osteosarcoma using current aggressive adjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection is between 60% and 70%. In patients who present with nonmetastatic, high-grade extremity osteosarcoma of bone, limb salvage surgery is favored, when appropriate, over amputation to preserve the limb, because limb salvage may lead to a superior quality of life compared with amputation. However, concern remains that in the attempt to preserve the limb, close or microscopically positive surgical margins may have an adverse effect on event-free survival. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does a positive or close surgical margin increase the likelihood of a local recurrence? (2) Does a positive or close surgical margin adversely affect the development of metastatic disease? (3) What is the relationship of surgical margin on overall survival? METHODS: With institutional review board approval, we retrospectively evaluated 241 patients treated at our institution between 1999 and 2011. Exclusion criteria included nonextremity locations, metastatic disease at initial presentation, low- or intermediate-grade osteosarcoma, treatment regimens that did not follow National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, incomplete medical records, and any part of treatment performed outside of Moffitt Cancer Center or All Children's Hospital. Fifty-one patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 31 (61%) had followup data at a minimum of 2 years or whose clinical status was known but had died before 2 years of followup. Margin status was defined as (1) microscopically positive; (2) negative ≤ 1 mm; and (3) negative > 1 mm. Margin status, histologic response (tumor percent necrosis), type of osteosarcoma, type of surgery, presence of local recurrence, metastatic disease, and overall survival were recorded for each patient. The mean age was 22 years (range, 12-74 years) and the mean followup was 3 years (range, 0.1-14 years). Margin status was positive in 10% (five of 51), negative ≤ 1 mm 26% (13 of 51), and negative > 1 mm 65% (33 of 51). RESULTS: Local recurrence was noted to be 14% (seven of 51) at 3.4 years. After controlling for relevant confounding variables, the presence of a positive margin compared with a negative margin > 1 mm was the only independent predictor of local recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 8.006; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.314-48.781; p = 0.0241). At a mean of 3.4 years, 29% (15 of 51) of the patients developed metastatic disease with no difference with the numbers available in the probability of developing metastatic disease among the three margin groups (p = 0.614). Overall survival at 3.8 years was 75% (38 of 51). After controlling for relevant confounding variables, we found that patients with positive margins were more likely to die from disease than those with negative margins (HR, 6.26; 95% CI, 1.50-26.14; p = 0.0119); no other independent predictors of survival were identified. CONCLUSIONS: With the numbers of patients we had, we observed that patients with extremity, nonmetastatic, high-grade osteosarcoma who had positive margins showed a higher probability of local recurrence in comparison to those with negative surgical margins. Given that positive margins appear to be associated with poorer survival in patients with high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities, surgeons should strive to achieve negative margins, but larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Huesos de la Pierna/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Osteosarcoma/cirugía , Amputación Quirúrgica , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Huesos de la Pierna/patología , Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Osteosarcoma/patología , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia
2.
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek ; 163(2): 60-8, 2004.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15199773

RESUMEN

A retrospective analysis was performed of treatment of 1612 patients with gunshot fractures of long bones of the extremities wounded in the Republic of Afghanistan and Chechen Republic. Under study was the infrastructure of the gunshot fractures, general and local factors responsible for the development of suppurations. A angioneurodystrophy theory of pathogenesis of gunshot osteomyelitis is proposed. The level of proinflammatory cytokines was determined in blood serum and wound discharge for the early diagnosis of purulent complications. An algorithm of the diagnostic search was developed with using modern radio- and electrophysiological methods. The standards of general and local treatment are proposed for different stages and spread of the purulent process.


Asunto(s)
Huesos de la Extremidad Superior/lesiones , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Huesos de la Pierna/lesiones , Osteomielitis/terapia , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/terapia , Guerra , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Huesos de la Extremidad Superior/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Fracturas Óseas/sangre , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Humanos , Huesos de la Pierna/cirugía , Osteomielitis/etiología , Osteomielitis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/sangre , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA