Characterization of mouse models of Mycobacterium avium complex infection and evaluation of drug combinations.

The Mycobacterium avium complex is the most common cause of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease worldwide; yet, an optimal treatment regimen for M. avium complex infection has not been established. Clarithromycin is accepted as the cornerstone drug for treatment of M. avium lung disease; however, good model systems, especially animal models, are needed to evaluate the most effective companion drugs. We performed a series of experiments to evaluate and use different mouse models (comparing BALB/c, C57BL/6, nude, and beige mice) of M. avium infection and to assess the anti-M. avium activity of single and combination drug regimens, in vitro, ex vivo, and in mice. In vitro, clarithromycin and moxifloxacin were most active against M. avium, and no antagonism was observed between these two drugs. Nude mice were more susceptible to M. avium infection than the other mouse strains tested, but the impact of treatment was most clearly seen in M. avium-infected BALB/c mice. The combination of clarithromycin-ethambutol-rifampin was more effective in all infected mice than moxifloxacin-ethambutol-rifampin; the addition of moxifloxacin to the clarithromycin-containing regimen did not increase treatment efficacy. Clarithromycin-containing regimens are the most effective for M. avium infection; substitution of moxifloxacin for clarithromycin had a negative impact on treatment efficacy.

Hot tub lung: presenting features and clinical course of 21 patients.

BACKGROUND: Hot tub lung is an emerging lung disorder associated with exposure to Mycobacterium avium complex organisms contaminating hot tub water. OBJECTIVES: To define the clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with hot tub lung. METHODS: Retrospective review of 21 patients diagnosed with hot tub lung at a tertiary medical center over a 7-year period. RESULTS: The mean (+/-sd) age at presentation was 46 (+/- 15) years; 9 patients were men (43%). All patients described ongoing exposure to hot tubs. The most common referral diagnoses were sarcoidosis, bronchitis, and asthma. Dyspnea and cough were present in all patients, hypoxemia was noted in 10 patients (48%). High-resolution computed tomography of the chest had been performed in 20 patients and demonstrated diffuse centrilobular nodules and/or ground-glass opacities in all patients. M. avium complex was isolated from the hot tub water, respiratory secretions and/or lung tissue in all patients. Bronchoscopic or surgical lung biopsy was obtained in 18 patients and demonstrated bronchiolocentric granulomatous inflammation. With avoidance of exposure, clinical and radiologic improvement was observed in all patients. Additionally, 13 patients (62%) received corticosteroid therapy, 1 (5%) antimycobacterial therapy, 2 (10%) received both, and 5 patients (24%) received no pharmacologic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Hot tub lung likely represents hypersensitivity pneumonitis due to inhalational exposure to M. avium complex. Antimycobacterial therapy does not appear to be required in the management of this disease. Although corticosteroids may be helpful in the treatment of severely affected patients, others can be managed by avoidance of additional exposure alone.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis reaction to Mycobacterium avium in household water.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity pneumonitis has been described with exposure to aerosolized Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) in indoor hot tubs (hot tub lung). OBJECTIVES: To describe a case of MAC-associated hypersensitivity pneumonitis-like reaction possibly from showering and review previous hot tub lung reports. METHODS: For the case report, we investigated a patient with histologically diagnosed hypersensitivity pneumonitis and MAC-positive sputum culture findings. Mycobacterial cultures were obtained from his home and workplace. Isolates were typed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. For the review, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for hot tub lung reports, which were reviewed and summarized. RESULTS: A 50-year-old man had progressive dyspnea and episodic fever and myalgias. Pulmonary function testing results revealed obstruction and impaired diffusion; a chest CT scan found diffuse, centrilobular, ground-glass nodules, and air trapping, and a lymphocytic alveolitis with an elevated CD4/CD8 ratio. Transbronchial biopsy showed multiple well-formed nonnecrotizing granulomas. Multiple respiratory samples and shower and bathtub specimens grew MAC, with matching pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns. The patient changed from showering to tub bathing. Prednisone and antimycobacterial drugs were administered for approximately 1 year. His symptoms, pulmonary function abnormalities, and CT scan findings resolved. The literature review yielded 36 cases of hot tub lung. Clinical features included dyspnea (97%), cough (78%), and fever (58%). Pulmonary function testing showed obstruction (67%), restriction (55%), and impaired diffusion (75%). A chest CT scan showed ground-glass opacification (95%) and nodules (67%). Granulomas were well-formed in 95%. Treatments included discontinuation of hot tub use and prednisone, antimycobacterial drugs, or both. Outcomes were favorable. CONCLUSIONS: A hypersensitivity pneumonitis-like reaction to mycobacteria can occur from exposures other than hot tubs. There are key differences between classic hypersensitivity pneumonitis and MAC-associated hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Antimycobacterial therapy may be required. The possibility of MAC hypersensitivity pneumonitis from showering raises potential implications in the investigation of patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

Selection of clarithromycin-resistant Mycobacterium avium complex during combined therapy using the beige mouse model.

Sixteen weeks of treatment with clarithromycin (CLARI) alone displayed significant bactericidal activity against Mycobacterium avium complex infection in beige mice. Only two combined regimens, CLARI combined with an initial 4 or 8 weeks of amikacin (AMIKA), displayed activity greater than that displayed by CLARI alone. Four other combined regimens, CLARI combined with ethambutol (EMB), rifabutin (RBT), or both EMB and RBT during the entire 16 weeks of treatment or with AMIKA administered in an initial 2-week course showed bactericidal activity not significantly greater than that of CLARI alone. After 16 weeks of treatment, CLARI-resistant mutants were isolated from the majority of mice that had been treated with CLARI alone, CLARI-RBT, CLARI-EMB, or CLARI-EMB-RBT, as was the case for untreated controls, but the frequencies of occurrence of mutants were significantly greater in the groups treated with these combinations or CLARI alone. On the other hand, no CLARI-resistant mutants were isolated from the mice that had been treated with the combination of CLARI plus an initial 4 or 8 weeks of AMIKA and were isolated from only a tiny proportion of mice that had been treated with CLARI plus an initial 2 weeks of AMIKA. Therefore, only treatment with CLARI combined with an initial 4 or 8 weeks of AMIKA but not combined with RBT or EMB or both, could enhance the activity of the drug treatment and prevent the selection of CLARI-resistant mutants.

Survival of patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome and disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection with and without antimycobacterial chemotherapy.

The contribution of disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (DMAC) infection to the morbidity and mortality of patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) is unclear. Previous studies that suggested the decreased survival of patients with AIDS and DMAC had incomplete information on patient immunologic status and follow-up. We studied patients with AIDS and DMAC and compared their survival with that of AIDS patients without DMAC but with other comparable risk factors for survival. Case and control subjects were similar in terms of CD4 cell count, prior AIDS status, history of antiretroviral therapy, history of Pneumocystis carinii prophylaxis, and year of diagnosis. A group of 39 patients with untreated DMAC had significantly shorter survival, mean of 5.6 +/- 1.1 months (median 4 months), than 39 matched patients with AIDS but without DMAC, mean 10.8 +/- 1.3 months (median 11 months, p less than 0.0001). The survival of 16 additional patients with DMAC who received antimycobacterial therapy, mean of 9.5 +/- 1.4 months (median 8 months), was not significantly shorter than that of an additional 16 matched control subjects, mean 11.7 +/- 1.9 months (median 11 months, p = 0.58). Patients with treated DMAC survived significantly longer than those with untreated DMAC (p less than 0.01). We conclude that untreated DMAC significantly shortens survival. Moreover, these results indicate that patients with DMAC who receive antimycobacterial therapy do not experience the shortened survival seen in untreated DMAC.