Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 51(4): 571-577, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29180276

RESUMEN

Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide with a very prolonged half-life enabling treatment with a single intravenous administration that has been approved to treat complicated skin and soft-tissue infections. Information on the efficacy and safety of dalbavancin in other situations is very scarce. This retrospective study included adult patients who received at least one dose of dalbavancin between 2016 and 2017 in 29 institutions in Spain. The primary objective was to report the use of dalbavancin in clinical practice, including its efficacy and tolerability. The potential impact of dalbavancin on reducing the length of hospital stay and hospital costs was also evaluated. A total of 69 patients received dalbavancin during the study period (58.0% male; median age 63.5 years). Dalbavancin was used to treat prosthetic joint infection (29.0%), acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection (21.7%), osteomyelitis (17.4%) and catheter-related bacteraemia (11.6%). These infections were mainly caused by Staphylococcus aureus (27 isolates), coagulase-negative staphylococci (24 isolates) and Enterococcus spp. (11 isolates). All but two patients received previous antibiotics for a median of 18 days. Dalbavancin was administered for a median of 21 days (range 7-168 days), and concomitant antimicrobial therapy was prescribed to 25 patients (36.2%). The overall clinical success rate of dalbavancin was 84.1%. Adverse events, mainly mild in intensity, were reported in nine patients. Overall, dalbavancin was estimated to reduce hospitalisation by 1160 days, with an estimated overall cost reduction of €211 481 (€3064 per patient). Dalbavancin appears to be an effective therapy for many serious Gram-positive infections.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteomielitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Cutáneas Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Teicoplanina/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/economía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteomielitis/economía , Osteomielitis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/economía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/economía , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/microbiología , España , Teicoplanina/efectos adversos , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico
2.
Kidney Int ; 79(6): 587-598, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21178979

RESUMEN

Central venous catheter-related infections have been associated with high morbidity, mortality, and costs. Catheter use in chronic hemodialysis patients has been recognized as distinct from other patient populations who require central venous access, leading to recent adaptations in guidelines-recommended diagnosis for catheter-related bacteremia (CRB). This review will discuss the epidemiology and pathogenesis of hemodialysis CRB, in addition to a focus on interventions that have favorably affected CRB outcomes. These include: (1) the use of prophylactic topical antimicrobial ointments at the catheter exit site, (2) the use of prophylactic catheter locking solutions for the prevention of CRB, (3) strategies for management of the catheter in CRB, and (4) the use of vascular access managers and quality initiative programs.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/economía , Cateterismo Venoso Central/economía , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/economía , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/economía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Diálisis Renal/economía , Diálisis Renal/instrumentación , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol ; 72(2): 167-77, 1991 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1833710

RESUMEN

A decision-analytic model and a cost effectiveness analysis was performed on 1 million hypothetic prosthetic joint patients undergoing dental treatment, to determine the most cost-effective strategy to prevent late prosthetic joint infections. The cost per quality-adjusted life-year saved (QALY) was determined for three preventive strategies: no prophylaxis, oral penicillin, and oral cephalexin. The UCLA Pain-Walking-Function-Activity Scale was used to obtain quality-of-life adjustments (utility assessment) for the study population. Costs were derived from 70 patients hospitalized between July 1, 1982, and June 30, 1986, at the UCLA Center for Health Sciences. The most cost-effective preventive strategy was the no prophylaxis alternative ($196,500/QALY). However, by recommending a 1-day strategy of oral cephalexin only to those dental patients at high risk for late prosthetic joint infections rather than a 3-day regimen to all patients, the cost effectiveness improved from $1.1 million/QALY to $446,100/QALY while maintaining a low risk of death (0.38 deaths per 10(6) dental visits).


Asunto(s)
Atención Dental para la Persona con Discapacidad/economía , Prótesis de Cadera/economía , Prótesis de la Rodilla/economía , Modelos Estadísticos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Cefalexina/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Árboles de Decisión , Política de Salud , Humanos , Dimensión del Dolor , Penicilinas/uso terapéutico , Premedicación , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/economía , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA