Selection strategy of second-line biologic therapies in adult patients with ulcerative colitis following prior biologic treatment failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing second-line biologic therapies for adult ulcerative colitis (UC) post first-line failure is essential. OBJECTIVE: Compare second-line biologic therapy efficacy in adult UC patients with prior treatment failure. METHODS: A comprehensive search of electronic databases up to May 2023 was conducted to assess second-line biologic therapy efficacy using a random effects model. Parameters analyzed included clinical remission rate, clinical response rate, mucosal healing rate, annual discontinuation rate, and colectomy rates. RESULTS: Forty-three research papers were analyzed. Clinical remission rates for second-line biologics were ranked at 6-14 weeks: Infliximab (30%) was followed by Vedolizumab (29%), Ustekinumab (27%), and Adalimumab (19%). At 52-54 weeks, the order shifted, with Vedolizumab (35%) followed by Infliximab (32%), Ustekinumab (31%), and Adalimumab (26%). The mucosal healing rate was 21%, ranked as: Infliximab (31%), Vedolizumab (21%), Adalimumab (21%), and Ustekinumab (14%). The annual discontinuation rate stood at 20%, with Adalimumab (25%), Vedolizumab (18%), Infliximab (17%), and Ustekinumab (16%). Discontinuation rates due to primary failure (PF), secondary failure (SF), and adverse events (AE) were 6%, 12%, and 3%, respectively. The annual colectomy rate was 9%, with Adalimumab (15%) followed by Vedolizumab (10%), Ustekinumab (9%), and Infliximab (5%), and colectomy rates of 10% due to PF, 12% due to SF, and 4% due to AE. CONCLUSION: For UC patients with first-line treatment failure, it is recommended to prioritize infliximab or vedolizumab as second-line biologic therapies, while avoiding adalimumab as the primary choice. Further clinical trials are necessary to assess ustekinumab efficacy accurately.

Infections in inflammatory bowel disease patients on immunomodulator and biologic therapy are not associated with high serum drug levels.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies now utilise higher doses of immunomodulatory and biologic therapies, predisposing patients to an increased risk of infections. AIMS: We aimed to determine whether infections were associated with high anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drug levels in IBD and to quantify the risk and consequences of infections. METHODS: Two retrospective studies were performed, a descriptive cohort study and a matched case-control study. For the matched case-control study, cases of infection occurring on anti-TNF agents were matched in a 1:2 ratio to controls of anti-TNF treated patients without infections. RESULTS: In the descriptive study, 76 infections occurred in 60 patients, including 49 bacterial, 24 viral, four fungal and four parasitic. Of these, 61 (80.3%) were on biologics, 49 (64.5%) on immunomodulators and 11 (14.5%) on corticosteroids. Thirty-four (44.7%) were on combination therapy, 27 (35.5%) on biologic monotherapy and 15 (19.7%) on immunomodulator monotherapy. Median anti-TNF drug levels in infection cases were 3.9 µg/mL for infliximab and 6.0 µg/mL for adalimumab. In the case-control study, 32 cases of infection in 27 anti-TNF treated patients were matched with 64 anti-TNF treated controls without infections. Among infection cases, 59.5% were on combination therapy versus 40.6% on biologic monotherapy (P = 0.59). Median drug levels for cases and controls respectively were 3.9 µg/mL versus 5.5 µg/mL for infliximab (P = 0.72) and 6.0 µg/mL versus 9.9 µg/mL for adalimumab (P = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Infections in patients with IBD were common, and the risk was highest with combination therapy. Infections were not associated with high serum anti-TNF levels.

Sarcopenia assessed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging is associated with the loss of response to biologic therapies in adult patients with Crohn's disease.

Sarcopenia occurs in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, the association between sarcopenia and loss of response (LOR) to biologic agents remains unclear. This study explored such an association in CD patients. This retrospective study included 94 CD patients who received biologic therapy. The skeletal muscle cross-sectional area at the third lumbar was assessed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for sarcopenia evaluation. A LOR was defined by fecal calprotectin (FC) < 250 µg/g or >50% reduction from baseline levels or other factors, such as the used agent being replaced by other biologic agents. The association between sarcopenia and LOR was assessed by logistic regression analysis. LOR was observed in 54 patients (57.4%). The prevalence of sarcopenia in the LOR group was higher than that in response group (70.4% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.003). Sarcopenia (odds ratio [OR] = 3.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31-11.54), Montreal L1 type (OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.06-0.60), perianal lesions (OR = 4.08, 95% CI: 1.31-12.70), and monocytes percentage (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.02-1.57) at baseline were independent associated factors for LOR. Sarcopenia was also associated with LOR in patients who received infliximab (OR = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.11-9.87). Montreal L1 type, perianal lesions, and monocytes percentage (Model 1), and with additional consideration of sarcopenia (Model 2), were developed to predict LOR. Model 2 showed better performance than Model 1 (area under the curve [AUC] 0.82 vs. 0.75). Sarcopenia was associated with the LOR to biological agents or infliximab in adult patients with CD.

The predictors of paradoxical reactions, especially psoriasis, to biologic therapy-findings from the TReasure database: a 5-year follow-up study.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to assess the clinical characteristics, predictive factors, and practical algorithms of paradoxical reactions (PRs), specifically paradoxical psoriasis (PP). METHODS: The TReasure database is a web-based prospective observational cohort comprised of patients with RA and SpA from 17 centres around Turkey since 2017. A cohort study and a case-control study nestled within the cohort were identified. RESULTS: In total, 2867 RA and 5316 SpA patients were evaluated. The first biologic agent was found to have caused PRs in 60% of the 136 patients (1.66%) who developed the PRs. The median time interval between the PRs and biological onset was 12 months (range 1-132 months, mean 21 months). The most common types of PP, constituting 92.6% of PRs, were pustular (60.3%) and palmoplantar (30.9%). Adalimumab (30.9%), infliximab (19%) and etanercept (17.4%) were the most common agents causing the PP. In the treatment of most PP patients (73.2%), switching biologic agents was favoured, with TNF inhibitor (TNFi) chosen in 46.03% and non-TNFi in 26.9% of cases. The three most frequently selected drugs were etanercept (24.6%), secukinumab (9.5%) and adalimumab (8.7%). Only 5.17% of patients who switched to another TNFi showed progression. The odds ratios (s) for SSZ, HCQ, and LEF use were significantly higher in RA controls than in PP patients (P = 0.033, OR = 0.15; P = 0.012, OR = 0.15; and P = 0.015, OR = 0.13, respectively). In the PP group with SpA, the number of smokers was significantly higher (P = 0.003, OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.05, 3.81). CONCLUSION: Contrary to expectations based on earlier research suggesting that paradoxical reactions develop with the class effect of biological agents, the response of patients who were shifted to another TNFi was favourable.

Biologic therapies associated with development of palmoplantar pustulosis and palmoplantar pustular psoriasis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) and palmoplantar pustular psoriasis (PPPP) are chronic inflammatory skin conditions characterized by eruptions of sterile pustules on the palms and/or soles. Biologic use has been associated with PPP and PPPP development in the literature. OBJECTIVES: To identify PPP and PPPP associated with biologics and summarize reported treatments and outcomes. METHODS: We systematically searched in MEDLINE and Embase for articles that reported PPP or PPPP during biologic treatment. After a full-text review, 53 studies were included for analysis. RESULTS: We identified 155 patients with PPP/PPPP onset during biologic treatment, with a mean age of 44.1 years and a female preponderance (71.6%). The most frequently reported biologics were adalimumab (43.9%) and infliximab (33.3%). IL-17 inhibitors, secukinumab (7.6%) and brodalumab (1.5%), were reported only in association with PPPP. Overall, 58.8% of patients had complete remission (CR) in 3.6 months and 23.5% had partial remission (PR) in 3.7 months. The most common treatments that led to CR were topical corticosteroids (n = 16) and biologic switching (n = 8). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should anticipate PPP or PPPP as potential drug reactions to biologics such as adalimumab and infliximab. Large-scale studies are required to confirm our findings and further explore the pathogenesis for biologic-associated PPP and PPPP.

Influence of biologic therapy on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. / Influencia del tratamiento biológico en los factores de riesgo cardiovascular de los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic immune-mediated diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), present an increased risk of developing early atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events (CVE) at early age. OBJECTIVE: To describe the baseline and 1-year cardiovascular profile of patients with IBD according to the biologic treatment received, taking into account the inflammatory activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: It is a retrospective, observational study that included 374 patients. Cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and CVE were collected at the baseline visit and at one-year follow-up to describe the cardiovascular risk according to the biological treatment received, also assessing clinical and biological remission. RESULTS: A total of 374 patients were included: 146 (38.73%) were treated with Infliximab, 128 (33.95%) with adalimumab, 61 (16.18%) with ustekinumab and 42 (11.14%) with vedolizumab. The changes in blood glucose levels are [86.31mg/dL (84.57-88.06) vs. 89.25mg/dL (87.54-90.96), P=.001] for those treated with antiTNFα and [86.52mg/dL (83.48-89.55) vs. 89.44mg/dL (85.77-93.11), P=.11] in the other group. In the group treated with antiTNFα total cholesterol values at baseline visit are [169.40mg/dL (164.97-173.83) vs. 177.40mg/dL (172.75-182.05) at one year of treatment, P=<.001], those of HDL [50.22mg/dL (48.39-52.04) vs. 54.26mg/dL (52.46-56.07), P=<.001] and those of triglycerides [114.77mg/dL (106.36-123.18) vs. 121.83mg/dL (112.11-131.54), P=.054]. Regarding weight, an increase was observed, both in those patients treated with antiTNFα [71.39kg (69.53-73.25) vs. 72.87kg (71.05-74.70), P<.001], and in the group treated with ustekinumab and vedolizumab [67.59kg (64.10-71.08) vs. 69.43kg (65.65-73.04), P=.003]. Concerning CVE, no significant differences were observed neither according to the drug used (p=0.36), nor according to personal history of CVE (P=.23) nor according to inflammatory activity (P=.46). CONCLUSIONS: Our results on a real cohort of patients with IBD treated with biologic drugs show a better control of certain cardiovascular parameters such as CRP or HDL, but a worsening of others such as total cholesterol or triglycerides, regardless of the treatment. Therefore, it is possibly the disease control and not the therapeutic target used, the one that affect the cardiovascular risk of these patients.

Efficacy and safety of biologic therapy in microscopic colitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of biologic therapy in the treatment of steroid-refractory microscopic colitis (MC). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central to identify articles and abstracts reporting efficacy or safety data on biologic use (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and tofacitinib) for induction and maintenance of remission in MC. We assessed clinical remission and response rates and all reported adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 376 studies were screened yielding 13 articles (including four abstracts) with a combined information on 78 patients for efficacy and safety outcomes. Most studies were case series. Vedolizumab was used in five studies, adalimumab in three, and a combination of infliximab and adalimumab in five studies. The rates of remission were 66.08% (95% CI, 36.79-95.37%; I2 , 71%) at weeks 3-6 and 54.20% (95% CI, 39.39-69.01%; I2 , 0%) at weeks 12-16. Clinical response rates were 100% (95% CI, 88.04-100%; I2 , 0%) at weeks 3-6 and 67.20% (95% CI, 47.72-86.69%; I2 , 52%) at weeks 12-16. Most frequent AE was medication discontinuation with a pooled incidence of 16.1% (95% CI, 5.9-37.5%). No deaths attributable to biologic use were reported. The overall quality of evidence was very low due to the high risk of biases. CONCLUSION: Low-quality evidence supports the short-term efficacy of biologics in budesonide refractory MC. While our findings represent the most comprehensive evaluation of biologic therapy in severe MC, further research including randomized clinical trials is needed to better define the role of specific agents and long-term therapy.

Safety of sequential biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: results from a tertiary referral centre.

BACKGROUND: Biologicals represent the cornerstone of treatment for moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Many patients cycle between biologicals when encountering loss of response or adverse events. AIM: To assess the occurrence of serious infections and malignancies with exposure to several (classes of) biologicals. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary referral centre including consecutive IBD patients exposed to adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab or vedolizumab between 1996 and 2019. All serious infections and malignancies, as well as potential confounders, were accounted for. RESULTS: In total, 1575 patients were included with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 10 (6-16) years and a duration of biological therapy of 71 (39-112) months. Incidence rates of serious infections were 3.4 per 100 patients' years (PY) in the post-biological setting. Serious infections after biological exposure were associated with systemic steroids in monotherapy (hazard ratio 2.96 [95% confidence interval 1.78-4.93], p < 0.0001), combination therapy of systemic steroids and a biological (2.44 [1.37-4.34], p = 0.002), female gender (1.25 [1.04-1.51], p = 0.02), and prior serious infections in the pre-biological setting (1.42 [1.03-1.96], p = 0.03). Malignancy rates were 1.06 per 100PY in the post-biological setting and increased with older age at biological initiation (1.04 [1.02-1.05], p < 0.0001). The risk for serious infections or malignancies was independent of type and number of biologicals to which the patient was exposed. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the sequential use of biological therapy in IBD does not seem to convey an overall higher risk of serious infections or malignancies, but that underlying more refractory disease seems to increase this risk.

Eficacia y seguridad de guselkumab en el tratamiento de pacientes adultos con psoriasis vulgar activa, moderada a severa con respuesta inadecuada o intolerancia a seis líneas de tratamiento: terapia tópica convencional (beclometasona o clobetasol), fototerapia, terapia convencional sistémica (acitretin, metotrexate o ciclosporina), otros anti-tnf (adalimumab y etanercept) diferentes a infliximab, anti-il17 (secukinumab), y antecedentes de tuberculosis activa o latente ante el uso de infliximab / Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in the treatment of adult patients with active, moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris with inadequate response or intolerance to six lines of treatment: conventional topical therapy (beclomethasone or clobetasol), phototherapy, conventional systemic therapy (acitretin, methotrexate or cyclosporine ), other anti-tnf (adalimumab and etanercept) other than infliximab

ANTECEDENTES: En el marco de la metodología ad hoc para evaluar solicitudes de tecnologías sanitarias, aprobada mediante Resolución del Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación N° 111-IETSI-ESSALUD-2021, se ha elaborado el presente dictamen, el cual expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad de guselkumab en el tratamiento de pacientes adultos con psoriasis vulgar activa, moderada a severa con respuesta inadecuada o intolerancia a seis líneas de tratamiento: terapia tópica convencional (beclometasona o clobetasol), fototerapia, terapia convencional sistémica (acitretin, metotrexate o ciclosporina), otros anti-TNF (adalimumab y etanercept) diferentes a infliximab, anti-IL17 (secukinumab), y antecedentes de tuberculosis activa o latente ante el uso de infliximab. ASPECTOS GENERALES: La psoriasis es la enfermedad dermatológica crónica e inmunitaria más frecuente, que afecta a más de 60 millones de adultos y niños en el mundo (WHO, 2016), con una prevalencia de alrededor de 2.5 % en el Perú (Rodríguez-Zúñiga, 2016). Esta enfermedad presenta varios fenotipos, donde destaca la presentación en placas, también conocida como psoriasis vulgar (Greb, 2016). Este fenotipo es el más común, y se caracteriza por la presencia de placas circunscritas, simétricas, con zonas eritematosas, gruesas y escamosas que aparecen frecuentemente en cuero cabelludo, tronco y extremidades (superficies extensoras) (Griffiths et al., 2021). La psoriasis suele clasificarse en leve, moderada y severa, y se rige de las mediciones de la Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), la Body surface area (BSA) y la calidad de vida medida a partir del Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (Finlay, 2015; Robinson et al., 2012). La enfermedad severa se define cuando el paciente presenta un BSA de más del 10 %, y más de 10 puntos en la DLQI (Daudén et al., 2016). Los pacientes con psoriasis vulgar que tienen un compromiso severo requieren cualquiera de los tratamientos sistémicos convencionales (metotrexato, ciclosporina o acitretin) y fototerapia. Cuando estos medicamentos no producen una respuesta adecuada, se administran terapias biológicas (Paolo Gisondi et al., 2017). Las terapias biológicas tienen una inhibición dirigida de las vías del sistema inmune que implican citoquinas específicas, como el factor de necrosis tumoral (TNF), la interleucina (IL)-17 y la IL-23 (Fellner, 2016). La decisión de cuándo y cómo progresar en los algoritmos de tratamiento se basa en objetivos de tratamiento; los cuales están relacionados con medidas de resultados y el impacto de la enfermedad en la calidad de vida (Mrowietz et al., 2011). Actualmente, el objetivo final del tratamiento es la remisión completa o casi completa de las lesiones cutáneas, y una mejora del 90 % o más del PASI que suelen evaluarse a las 12 o 16 semanas, que es el resultado más relevante del tratamiento en la enfermedad severa (Daudén et al., 2016; P. Gisondi et al., 2017; Piaserico et al., 2014). Cuando no se alcanzan estos objetivos, se puede aumentar la dosis, reducir el intervalo de tiempo entre las administraciones o realizar combinaciones de medicamentos. Cuando estas estrategias no funcionan se indica el cambio de medicamento (Piaserico et al., 2014). METODOLOGÍA: Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda bibliográfica amplia y exhaustiva con el objetivo de identificar la mejor evidencia disponible sobre la eficacia y seguridad de guselkumab en el tratamiento de pacientes adultos con psoriasis vulgar activa, moderada a severa con respuesta inadecuada o intolerancia a seis líneas de tratamiento: terapia tópica convencional (beclometasona o clobetasol), fototerapia, terapia convencional sistémica (acitretin, metotrexate o ciclosporina), otros anti-TNF (adalimumab y etanercept) diferentes a infliximab, anti-IL17 (secukinumab), y antecedentes de tuberculosis activa o latente ante el uso de infliximab. La búsqueda bibliográfica se realizó en las bases de datos bibliográficas PubMed, The Cochrane Library y LILACS (Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud). Asimismo, se realizó una búsqueda dentro de la información generada en las páginas web de grupos o instituciones que realizan revisiones sistemáticas, evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias y guías de práctica clínica, tales como: el National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), la Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), el Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), la Haute Authorité de Santé (HAS), el Institute for Quality and Efficiency in HealthCare (IQWiG), el Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) y en la Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas (BRISA), y en las principales instituciones o sociedades especializadas en reumatología: la American Academy of Dermatology (AAD), la British Association of Dermatologists (BAD), la European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), y la International Psoriasis Council (IPC). Además, se llevó a cabo una búsqueda manual en el motor de búsqueda Google utilizando los términos: "Psoriasis guidelines"; revisando en las diez primeras páginas de resultados, a fin de poder identificar otras publicaciones de relevancia que pudiesen haber sido omitidas por la estrategia de búsqueda o que no hayan sido publicadas en las bases de datos bibliográficas consideradas. Finalmente, se realizó una búsqueda manual en ClinicalTrials.gov para identificar ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (ECA) en curso o que no hayan sido publicados aún. RESULTADOS: Luego de la búsqueda bibliográfica hasta enero de 2021, se identificaron: una guía de práctica clínica (GPC) (BAD, 2020), y tres ECA fase III (Reich et al., 2019; Blauvelt et al., 2017; Reich et al., 2017). Por otro lado, se excluyeron tres GPC (AAD, 2019; EGDG, 2020; EDF, 2015) debido a que no brindan recomendaciones específicas para pacientes que han fallado a múltiples terapias. Además, se excluyeron seis ETS (SMC, 2018; HAS, 2018; IQWiG, 2018; ICER, 2018; NICE, 2018; CADTH, 2018) porque realizaron evaluaciones de guselkumab en una población que no corresponde a la población PICO. CONCLUSIÓN: Por lo expuesto, el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e InvestigaciónIETSI no aprueba el uso de guselkumab en pacientes adultos con psoriasis vulgar activa, moderada a severa con respuesta inadecuada o intolerancia a seis líneas de tratamiento: terapia tópica convencional (beclometasona o clobetasol), fototerapia, terapia convencional sistémica (acitretin, metotrexate o ciclosporina), otros anti-TNF (adalimumab y etanercept) diferentes a infliximab, anti-IL17 (secukinumab), y antecedentes de tuberculosis activa o latente ante el uso de infliximab, como producto farmacéutico no incluido en el Petitorio Farmacológico de EsSalud.

De-escalation of biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients following prior dose escalation.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on biological therapy de-escalation after prior escalation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. This study aimed to assess the frequency and success rate of de-escalation of biological therapy in IBD patients after prior dose escalation and to evaluate which measures are used to guide de-escalation. METHODS: This multicentre retrospective cohort study enrolled IBD patients treated with infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA) or vedolizumab (VEDO) in whom therapy was de-escalated after prior biological escalation. De-escalations were considered pharmacokinetic-driven if based on clinical symptoms combined with therapeutic or supratherapeutic trough levels, and disease activity-driven if based on faecal calprotectin less than or equal to 200 µg/g or resolution of perianal fistula drainage or closure or endoscopic remission. Successful de-escalation was defined as remaining on the same or lower biological dose for greater than or equal to 6 months after de-escalation without the need for corticosteroids. RESULTS: In total, 206 IFX users, 85 ADA users and 55 VEDO users underwent therapy escalation. Of these patients, 34 (17%) on IFX, 18 (21%) on ADA and 8 (15%) on VEDO underwent therapy de-escalation. De-escalation was successful in 88% of IFX patients, 89% of ADA and 100% of VEDO. The probability of remaining on the de-escalated regimen or further de-escalation after 1 year was 85% for IFX, 62% for ADA and 100% for VEDO. Disease activity-driven de-escalations were more often successful (97%) than pharmacokinetic- and no marker-driven de-escalations (76%); P = 0.017. CONCLUSION: De-escalation after biological dose escalation was successful in the majority of carefully selected IBD patients. Objective assessment of remission increased the likelihood of successful de-escalation.

Long-term survival of biological therapy in psoriatic arthritis: 18-year analysis of a cohort in a tertiary hospital.

To study retention of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or apremilast and potential predictors of lack of response in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). A single-center retrospective analysis of PsA patients who received ≥ 1 bDMARD or apremilast during 2000-2018. The main endpoint was lack of response (primary or secondary failure). Analyses included retention of DMARDs (Kaplan-Meier curves) and potential predictors of lack of response (bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models). A total of 159 patients with PsA received up to 8 DMARDs: etanercept (34%), adalimumab (30%), infliximab (9%), golimumab (9%), apremilast (7%), ustekinumab (5%), certolizumab (4%), and secukinumab (2%). Therapy was discontinued in 96 cases (60%), mainly owing to secondary failure (37%), followed by primary failure (25%) and adverse effects (24%). Retention was analyzed based on 313 units of analysis. Duration of follow-up was 846.1 treatment-years (maximum 14.8 years, median 2.75 years). A total of 172 DMARDs were discontinued. The probability of continuing the initial treatment was 37% at 5 years, 22% at 10 years, and 12% at 14 years. The longest medium retention time was observed for infliximab (6.2 years) and etanercept (4.5 years). Predictors of lack of response included male sex, number of swollen joints, and, especially, depression (OR = 35.2). The sensitivity and specificity of the model were 86.4% and 85.7%, respectively, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 45.6 (ROC, 0.912). Rates of discontinuation due to primary and secondary failure are high in PsA. Retention is better for anti-TNF agents than for other agents.

Psoriasis induced by biological therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a multicentre case series of new onset or worsening of psoriasis in patients treated with biological drugs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive study. We reviewed the clinical history of patients with chronic inflammatory disease (CID) treated with biological drugs, who developed new onset or worsening of psoriasis during the follow-up period. RESULTS: Twenty-six cases of paradoxical psoriasis (PP) were recorded. Ninety-three percent of the patients were treated with anti-TNFα and adalimumab was responsible for 50% of the cases. Only 5 patients had a personal history of psoriasis. The biological drug was discontinued in 13 patients. Lesion recurrence was more frequent when another anti-TNFα was reintroduced. CONCLUSIONS: The PP is a reversible adverse effect that can be observed in patients exposed to biological drugs, mainly anti-TNFα.

Safety of Biological Therapy in Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

OBJECTIVES: Retrospective, observational, single-center, cohort study investigating the safety profile of biological therapy in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Retrospective, observational, cohort study of pediatric patients with IBD, receiving infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab for at least 2 months. Data related to the immediate and delayed adverse events (AEs) were collected, focusing on the reaction type and severity, the time of onset, the outcome and the temporary or definitive therapy discontinuation secondary to the AE. Number of suspected and confirmed coronavirus disease-209 (COVID-19) cases and their outcomes, as well as flu vaccination coverage were collected. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five children were included (101 [55%] CD, 82 [44%] UC, and 2 [1%] IBDU): 149 received infliximab (IFX) (81%), 88 (48%) adalimumab (ADA), 18 (21%) vedolizumab, and 4 (2%) ustekinumab. The overall AE rates were 49%, 67% of whom likely medication-related. Eleven (6%) patients experienced more than 1 AE, 18 patients (10%) presented an immediate reaction, and 82 (45%) a delayed AE. Among the 90 patients experiencing at least 1 AE, 97% had mild-to-moderate AEs. Only 4 SAEs were reported (4%). Treatment discontinuation because of AE occurred in 25 patients (14%). Four COVID-19 cases were reported, all with a mild course. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm a good safety profile of biologics. Infusion reactions to IFX administration remain one of the main issues, significantly linked to its immunogenicity and consequently with an impact on its efficacy and durability.

Anti-TNF agent etanercept augments UV-induced skin cancer development in SKH-1 mice.

BACKGROUND: Despite being employed in the treatment of inflammatory disorders for more than 20 years all over the world, data regarding photocarcinogenic risks of anti-TNF agents is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To assess photocarcinogenic potential of anti-TNF agents. METHODS: This was a placebo controlled, split-body (UVB-treated versus -untreated) study on mice. Treatment groups were infliximab (n = 11), etanercept (n = 11), cyclosporine (n = 11) and vehicle control (n = 11). Agents were introduced on the 10th week of phototherapy and continued through 24th week. The macroscopic, histological and immunohistochemical analysis of test sites were carried out. RESULTS: Overall 132 tumors were detected on test sites. All of these tumors developed on UV-exposed sides. Histologic examination of these tumors was compatible with keratinocytic neoplasia in 128, mastocytosis in 3, epidermal cyst in 1. Median tumor burden in the UVB exposed areas for ETN, IFX, CYC, and control groups were 14.91, 10.20, 6.28, and 3.14 cm2, respectively. ETN group demonstrated both higher tumor burden and keratinocytic neoplasia numbers than controls (p = .03, p = .025). Although there were 1.8 and 1.7 times more keratinocytic neoplasms in IFX and CYC groups compared to controls, these differences didn't reach statistically significant levels (p = .14; p = .19). CONCLUSION: This study points out to a significant photocarcinogenic potential of anti-TNF agent etanercept.

Retrospective analysis of patients with psoriasis receiving biological therapy: Real-life data.

The aim of this study is to investigate the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients receiving biological therapy for psoriasis. All patients who received biological treatment for psoriasis were included in the study. Characteristics of patients and PASI responses' rates were evaluated at 6, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks. One hundred and three patients enrolled. Of all, 28 patients were using adalimumab (27.2%), 26 were using secukinumab (25.2%), 22 were using infliximab (21.4%), 22 were using ustekinumab (21.4%), 5 were using ixekizumab (4.9%). PASI75 response rates at sixth and 52nd weeks; were 68.1% and 95% for infliximab, 64.3% and 100% for adalimumab, 77.3% and 100% for ustekinumab, 76.9% and 81.3% for secukinumab, respectively. The most common reason for biologic switching was secondary failure. Treatment failure was the main reason of switching therapies. In our study, no statistically significant difference was found between efficacies of biological drugs. It remains unclear in what order and how exactly biological agent switching should be done. There is a need for large-scale studies on the treatment response rates, and survival times of different biologics.

Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor-Induced Psoriasis in a Pediatric Crohn's Disease Patient Successfully Treated with Ustekinumab.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are widely used in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease, as well as psoriasis. However, there is growing evidence that these medications can also paradoxically induce a psoriasiform skin reaction in a subset of patients. GOALS: We seek to share our experience in treating severe TNF inhibitor-induced psoriasis in a pediatric patient with Crohn’s disease. STUDY: We report a case of a 10-year-old female with Crohn’s disease, who developed psoriasis after twelve months of infliximab therapy. Her skin disease was recalcitrant to topical therapies, methotrexate, and phototherapy. RESULTS: The patient was transitioned to ustekinumab with significant improvement in her symptoms and maintenance of remission of her bowel disease. CONCLUSION: This is the first reported case of a school-age pediatric patient with TNF inhibitor-induced psoriasis treated with ustekinumab. Controlled trials are warranted to fully assess the safety and efficacy of ustekinumab for treating TNF inhibitor-induced psoriasis in the pediatric population.J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(3): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.2106.

Longitudinal Trajectory of Fatigue With Initiation of Biologic Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: Fatigue is prevalent in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD]. Biologic therapy is effective in achieving symptomatic and endoscopic remission, but its impact on fatigue is less well established. Our aim is to define the longitudinal trajectory of fatigue over 1 year in patients initiating biologic therapy. METHODS: This prospective cohort enrolled patients diagnosed with Crohn's disease [CD] or ulcerative colitis [UC] initiating biologic therapy with infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, or vedolizumab. Fatigue was quantified using the seven-point fatigue question in the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [SIBDQ]. A score of ≤4 for this question was used to define fatigue. Multivariable regression models adjusting for relevant confounders examined the independent association between attaining clinical remission and resolution of fatigue. RESULTS: Our study included 326 patients [206 CD, 120 UC] initiating biologic therapy [144 anti-tumour necrosis factor, 129 vedolizumab, 63 ustekinumab]. A total of 61% of the included patients reported significant fatigue at baseline. This was associated with female gender, depressive symptoms, active disease, and disturbed sleep [p < 0.001]. Among the 198 patients who were fatigued at therapy initiation, 86 [70%], 55 [63%], and 44 [61%] remained fatigued at Week 14, 30, and 54, respectively. At each of these time points, achieving clinical remission was associated with lower likelihood of persistent fatigue. However, despite achieving remission, 35%, 30%, and 28% of patients experienced persistent fatigue at Week 14, 30, and 54, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Fatigue is common in IBD. Though biologic therapy improves fatigue parallel symptomatic improvement, a significant proportion continue to experience persistent fatigue up to 1 year.

Adverse Medical Conditions Across Treatment Options in Patients With Psoriasis: A Claims-Based Analysis

Objective: To assess the real-world risk of developing adverse medical conditions (AMCs) among patients with psoriasis treated with biologic therapies or conventional systemic/topical therapies (CST/topical). Methods: Adult patients with psoriasis were identified from the Truven MarketScan US claims database (2008 Q3­2015 Q3) and classified into cohorts based on treatment initiated on the index date (adalimumab [ADA], etanercept [ETN], ustekinumab [UST], infliximab [IFX], or CST/topical). Incident AMCs were identified while on treatment from diagnoses recorded in medical claims and included abnormal test results, infections, mental disorders, cardiovascular disease, malignancies (skin and non-skin), and respiratory disease. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare AMC risk for (1) ADA, ETN, and UST (separately) vs CST/topical, and (2) ADA vs other biologic therapies (ETN, UST, and IFX combined). Regressions were adjusted for age, gender, region, insurance plan type, year, Charlson comorbidity index, and prior AMCs; and based on stepwise selection, comorbidities, specialist encounters, and frequently prescribed treatments. Results: A total of 42,981 patients were identified (ADA: 5,197; ETN: 3,311; UST: 1,370; IFX: 187; CST/topical: 32,916). Across cohorts, median age was 46­50 years, 46.2%­53.1% were female, and median follow-up duration was 3.3­7.9 months. For all cohorts, infection was the most frequent AMC (28.7%­41.8%). Compared with CST/topical, ADA, ETN, and UST were associated with a lower risk of infections (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.93, 0.92, and 0.86, respectively, all P<0.05). ADA was associated with a lower risk of malignancies (aHR: 0.71, P<0.05), and ETN was associated with a lower risk of respiratory disease (aHR: 0.80, P<0.05). Compared with biologic therapies, ADA was not associated with higher risk of AMCs. Conclusions: Compared to CST/topical, biologic therapies were associated with similar or lower risk of AMCs. Comparison between ADA and other biologic therapies suggests a similar safety profile with respect to the studied AMCs.

Clinical management of Anti-TNF-alpha-induced psoriasis or psoriasiform lesions in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a systematic review.

Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (anti-TNF-α) completely revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, anti-TNF-α-induced cutaneous side effects have been increasingly reported in the literature. Particularly, psoriasis and the recently recognized psoriasiform lesions are of particular concern, as anti-TNF-α agents are also used in the treatment of psoriasis, seemingly reflecting an immunological paradox. The clinical management of these cutaneous lesions is particularly challenging, owing to the potential need of anti-TNF-α discontinuation and scarcity of other therapeutic options. Therefore, optimization of current topical and systemic therapies and incorporation of new therapeutic agents is of great interest. Our aim is to review data in the literature regarding the clinical management of these cutaneous lesions and provide a therapeutic algorithm, supported by our experience as a tertiary referral center for IBD. Although in older reports no distinction was made, anti-TNF-α-induced psoriasiform lesions are not only more prevalent but also bear notable differences from classical psoriasis, possibly reflecting a different nosological entity. Onset of lesions has been related to periods of IBD remission, as supported by low levels of fecal calprotectin. Psoriasiform lesions can be adequately managed either by topical (glucocorticoids, calcineurin inhibitors, and antibiotics) or systemic (phototherapy, acitretin, glucocorticoids, and antibiotics) therapies and/or switch to other anti-TNF-α agents. Data referring to patients who were able to continue on the same IBD therapy ranged from 30.7 to 100%, reinforcing the importance of an adequate control of these lesions. The recently approved ustekinumab offers another step in the management of anti-TNF-α-intolerant patients.