Use of Efficiency Frontiers to Align Prices and Clinical Benefits of Biologic Therapies for Plaque Psoriasis.

Importance: The US lacks a systematic approach for aligning drug prices with clinical benefit, and traditional cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) faces political obstacles. The efficiency frontier (EF) method offers policymakers an alternative approach. Objective: To assess how the EF approach could align prices and clinical benefits of biologic medications for plaque psoriasis and estimate price reductions in the US vs 4 peer countries: Australia, Canada, France, and Germany. Design and Setting: This health economic evaluation used the EF approach to compare the prices and clinical benefits of 11 biologics and 2 biosimilars for plaque psoriasis in the US, Australia, Canada, France, and Germany. Data were collected from February to March 2023 and analyzed from March to June 2023. Main Outcome Measures: EFs were constructed based on each biologic's efficacy, measured using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 response rate, and annual treatment cost as of January 2023; US costs were net of estimated manufacturer rebates. Prices based on the EF were compared with traditional CEA-based prices calculated by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review at a threshold of $150 000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Results: Among 13 biologics, PASI 90 response rates ranged from 17.9% (etanercept) to 71.6% (risankizumab); US net annual treatment costs ranged from $1664 (infliximab-dyyb) to $79 277 (risankizumab). The median (IQR) net annual treatment cost was higher in the US ($34 965 [$20 493-$48 942]) than prerebate costs in Australia ($9179 [$6691-$12 688]), Canada ($15 556 [$13 017-$16 112]), France ($9478 [$6637-$11 678]), and Germany ($13 829 [$13 231-$15 837]). The US EF included infliximab-dyyb (PASI 90: 57.4%; annual cost: $1664), ixekizumab (PASI 90: 70.8%; annual cost: $33 004), and risankizumab (PASI 90: 71.6%; annual cost: $79 277). US prices for psoriasis biologics would need to be reduced by a median (IQR) of 71% (31%-95%) to align with those estimated using the EF; the same approach would yield smaller price reductions in Canada (41% [6%-57%]), Australia (36% [0%-65%]), France (19% [0%-67%]), and Germany (11% [8%-26%]). Except for risankizumab, the EF-based prices were lower than the prices based on traditional CEA. Conclusions and Relevance: This economic evaluation showed that for plaque psoriasis biologics, using an EF approach to negotiate prices could lead to substantial price reductions and better align prices with clinical benefits. US policymakers might consider using EFs to achieve prices commensurate with comparative clinical benefits, particularly for drug classes with multiple therapeutic alternatives for which differences can be adequately summarized by a single outcome measurement.

Corticosteroid-resistant immune-related adverse events: a systematic review.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment has become an important therapeutic option for various cancer types. Although the treatment is effective, ICI can overstimulate the patient's immune system, leading to potentially severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including hepatitis, colitis, pneumonitis and myocarditis. The initial mainstay of treatments includes the administration of corticosteroids. There is little evidence how to treat steroid-resistant (sr) irAEs. It is mainly based on small case series or single case reports. This systematic review summarizes available evidence about sr-irAEs. We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed. Additionally, we included European Society for Medical Oncology, Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines for irAEs in our assessment. The study population of all selected publications had to include patients with cancer who developed hepatitis, colitis, pneumonitis or myocarditis during or after an immunotherapy treatment and for whom corticosteroid therapy was not sufficient. Our literature search was not restricted to any specific cancer diagnosis. Case reports were also included. There is limited data regarding life-threatening sr-irAEs of colon/liver/lung/heart and the majority of publications are single case reports. Most publications investigated sr colitis (n=26), followed by hepatitis (n=21), pneumonitis (n=17) and myocarditis (n=15). There is most data for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to treat sr hepatitis and for infliximab, followed by vedolizumab, to treat sr colitis. Regarding sr pneumonitis there is most data for MMF and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) while data regarding infliximab are conflicting. In sr myocarditis, most evidence is available for the use of abatacept or anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (both with or without MMF) or ruxolitinib with abatacept. This review highlights the need for prompt recognition and treatment of sr hepatitis, colitis, pneumonitis and myocarditis. Guideline recommendations for sr situations are not defined precisely. Based on our search, we recommend-as first line treatment-(1) MMF for sr hepatitis, (2) infliximab for sr colitis, followed by vedolizumab, (3) MMF and IVIG for sr pneumonitis and (4) abatacept or ATG (both with or without MMF) or ruxolitinib with abatacept for sr myocarditis. These additional immunosuppressive agents should be initiated promptly if there is no sufficient response to corticosteroids within 3 days.

Infections in inflammatory bowel disease patients on immunomodulator and biologic therapy are not associated with high serum drug levels.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies now utilise higher doses of immunomodulatory and biologic therapies, predisposing patients to an increased risk of infections. AIMS: We aimed to determine whether infections were associated with high anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drug levels in IBD and to quantify the risk and consequences of infections. METHODS: Two retrospective studies were performed, a descriptive cohort study and a matched case-control study. For the matched case-control study, cases of infection occurring on anti-TNF agents were matched in a 1:2 ratio to controls of anti-TNF treated patients without infections. RESULTS: In the descriptive study, 76 infections occurred in 60 patients, including 49 bacterial, 24 viral, four fungal and four parasitic. Of these, 61 (80.3%) were on biologics, 49 (64.5%) on immunomodulators and 11 (14.5%) on corticosteroids. Thirty-four (44.7%) were on combination therapy, 27 (35.5%) on biologic monotherapy and 15 (19.7%) on immunomodulator monotherapy. Median anti-TNF drug levels in infection cases were 3.9 µg/mL for infliximab and 6.0 µg/mL for adalimumab. In the case-control study, 32 cases of infection in 27 anti-TNF treated patients were matched with 64 anti-TNF treated controls without infections. Among infection cases, 59.5% were on combination therapy versus 40.6% on biologic monotherapy (P = 0.59). Median drug levels for cases and controls respectively were 3.9 µg/mL versus 5.5 µg/mL for infliximab (P = 0.72) and 6.0 µg/mL versus 9.9 µg/mL for adalimumab (P = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Infections in patients with IBD were common, and the risk was highest with combination therapy. Infections were not associated with high serum anti-TNF levels.

Biologic Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease - Results from a Single Tertiary Care Center in North Macedonia.

Medical therapies used for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) include conventional (e.g. 5-aminosalicylates, steroids, immunomodulators) and biologic (e.g. inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor - alpha, integrin inhibitors, interleukin inhibitors) medications. Biologics, due to their high cost, were unfortunately not covered by the public health insurance system in North Macedonia until 2019 and, therefore, not widely utilized for our IBD patients. In 2019, the University Clinic of Gastroenterology and Hepatology in Skopje developed a biologic therapy supply, provided by the National Health Insurance Fund, making this therapy available for a larger number of patients. This report presents the initial results of our prospective, single tertiary-care center study on the effects of biologic therapy in patients with IBD in North Macedonia. The study is focused on the evaluation of clinical outcomes after anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti TNF-alpha) therapy in IBD patients with prior inadequate response to conventional medications.

Impact of Functional Polymorphisms on Drug Survival of Biological Therapies in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis.

Biological therapies (BTs) indicated for psoriasis are highly effective; however, not all patients obtain good results, and loss of effectiveness is the main reason for switching. Genetic factors may be involved. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the drug survival of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNF) medications and ustekinumab (UTK) in patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. We conducted an ambispective observational cohort study that included 379 lines of treatment with anti-TNF (n = 247) and UTK (132) in 206 white patients from southern Spain and Italy. The genotyping of the 29 functional SNPs was carried out using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with TaqMan probes. Drug survival was evaluated with Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier curves. The multivariate analysis showed that the HLA-C rs12191877-T (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.560; 95% CI = 0.40-0.78; p = 0.0006) and TNF-1031 (rs1799964-C) (HR = 0.707; 95% CI = 0.50-0.99; p = 0.048) polymorphisms are associated with anti-TNF drug survival, while TLR5 rs5744174-G (HR = 0.589; 95% CI = 0.37-0.92; p = 0.02), CD84 rs6427528-GG (HR = 0.557; 95% CI = 0.35-0.88; p = 0.013) and PDE3A rs11045392-T together with SLCO1C1 rs3794271-T (HR = 0.508; 95% CI = 0.32-0.79; p = 0.002) are related to UTK survival. The limitations are the sample size and the clustering of anti-TNF drugs; we used a homogeneous cohort of patients from 2 hospitals only. In conclusion, SNPs in the HLA-C, TNF, TLR5, CD84, PDE3A, and SLCO1C1 genes may be useful as biomarkers of drug survival of BTs indicated for psoriasis, making it possible to implement personalized medicine that will reduce financial healthcare costs, facilitate medical decision-making and improve patient quality of life. However, further pharmacogenetic studies need to be conducted to confirm these associations.

Hepcidin and Iron Status in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Undergoing Induction Therapy With Vedolizumab or Infliximab.

BACKGROUND: Hepcidin, the systemic iron regulator, could be critical in differentiating iron deficiency (ID) from functional iron restriction in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We assessed hepcidin as a diagnostic ID marker and explored the relationship between hepcidin and its regulators in patients with IBD undergoing induction therapy with infliximab (IFX) or vedolizumab (VEDO). METHODS: Patients with active IBD receiving induction therapy with IFX or VEDO were included. Serum samples at baseline and after 6 weeks of induction therapy were analyzed for hepcidin, inflammation- and hypoxia-associated cytokines, and oxidative stress. Data were analyzed by stratifying based on the response at week 14. Results were compared with samples from age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects. RESULTS: Patients receiving induction therapy with IFX (n = 71) or VEDO (n = 51) and healthy control subjects (n = 50) were included. At baseline, hepcidin correlated positively with ferritin and negatively with soluble transferrin receptor/log ferritin index (P < .001). ID was prevalent in 96.7% of patients who had hepcidin levels below the median. Hepcidin accurately identified ID: the area under the curve (hepcidin) was 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.95; P < .001). In total, 75.4% of patients responded to induction therapy; inflammation, hepcidin, and ferritin decreased significantly, while transferrin increased during induction therapy. These changes were observed only in patients who responded to the therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Hepcidin levels in IBD are primarily determined by ID, even in an inflammatory state. In addition, induction therapy can decrease hepcidin levels, which might lead to better bioavailability of iron supplements. Therefore, hepcidin is a potential diagnostic ID biomarker that could assist therapeutic decision making.

Absolute iron deficiency is the primary determinant of hepcidin levels, even in an inflammatory state. Induction therapy can decrease hepcidin levels, which might improve iron bioavailability. Hence, hepcidin is a potential diagnostic iron deficiency biomarker that could assist therapeutic decision making.

Drug utilization of biologic therapy in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: a population-based Danish cohort study 2015-2020.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to characterize the drug utilization and switch patterns of biological treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Using Danish national registries, this nationwide study included individuals diagnosed with UC or CD, bio-naïve at the initiation of treatment with infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, golimumab, or ustekinumab in 2015-2020. Hazard ratios of discontinuing the first treatment or switching to another biological treatment were explored using Cox regression. RESULTS: Among 2995 UC patients and 3028 CD patients, infliximab was used as a first-line biologic treatment in 89% of UC patients and 85% of CD patients, followed by adalimumab with 6%, vedolizumab with 3%, and golimumab with 1% for UC, and adalimumab with 12%, vedolizumab with 2%, and ustekinumab with 0.4% for CD.When comparing adalimumab as the first treatment series to infliximab, there was a higher risk of treatment discontinuation (excluding switch) among UC patients (hazard ratio: 2.02 [95% confidence interval: 1.57; 2.60]) and CD patients (1.85 [1.52; 2.24]). When comparing vedolizumab to infliximab, there was a lower risk of discontinuation for UC patients (0.51 [0.29-0.89]), and for CD patients, although not significantly (0.58 [0.32-1.03]). We observed no significant difference in the risk of switching to another biologic treatment for any of the biologics. CONCLUSION: More than 85% of UC and CD patients initiating biologic therapy had infliximab as their first-line biologic treatment, in accordance with official treatment guidelines. Future studies should explore the higher incidence of treatment discontinuation of adalimumab as the first treatment series.Key summarySeveral biologic therapies are available in the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.Clinical guidelines stipulate that infliximab should be the first-line biologic therapy.Drug utilization studies comparing biologic therapies head-to-head are sparse.In Denmark, during 2015-2020 infliximab remained the most widely used biologic treatment, with adalimumab being second.One in four patients experienced more than one biologic during the study period.The risk of discontinuation of biologic treatment (and not starting a new biologic) was higher for initiators of adalimumab.Clinical and social background factors available from the registers could not account for the observed risk difference in discontinuation.

Efficacy of biological therapies and small molecules in induction and maintenance of remission in luminal Crohn's disease: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: There are numerous biological therapies and small molecules licensed for luminal Crohn's disease (CD), but these are often studied in placebo-controlled trials, meaning relative efficacy is uncertain. We examined this in a network meta-analysis. DESIGN: We searched the literature to 1 July 2022, judging efficacy according to induction of clinical remission, clinical response and maintenance of clinical remission, and according to previous exposure or non-exposure to biologics. We used a random effects model and reported data as pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs, ranking drugs according to p-score. RESULTS: We identified 25 induction of remission trials (8720 patients). Based on failure to achieve clinical remission, infliximab 5 mg/kg ranked first versus placebo (RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.79, p-score 0.95), with risankizumab 600 mg second and upadacitinib 45 mg once daily third. However, risankizumab 600 mg ranked first for clinical remission in biologic-naïve (RR=0.66, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.85, p-score 0.78) and in biologic-exposed patients (RR=0.74, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.82, p-score 0.92). In 15 maintenance of remission trials (4016 patients), based on relapse of disease activity, upadacitinib 30 mg once daily ranked first (RR=0.61, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.72, p-score 0.93) with adalimumab 40 mg weekly second, and infliximab 10 mg/kg 8-weekly third. Adalimumab 40 mg weekly ranked first in biologic-naïve patients (RR=0.59, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.73, p-score 0.86), and vedolizumab 108 mg 2-weekly first in biologic-exposed (RR=0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.86, p-score 0.82). CONCLUSION: In a network meta-analysis, infliximab 5 mg/kg ranked first for induction of clinical remission in all patients with luminal CD, but risankizumab 600 mg was first in biologic-naïve and biologic-exposed patients. Upadacitinib 30 mg once daily ranked first for maintenance of remission.

Biological therapy for ocular Behçet's disease with off-label drug prescription in Turkey.

OBJECTIVE: The use of biological agents in the treatment of ocular Behçet's disease has recently become more frequent. The use of two agents, infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA), for the treatment of Behçet's disease requires prior approval by the Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency. We report on a review of such applications with a view to informing on how such agents are used off-label in Turkey. METHODS: Prescriptions for off-label use of IFX or ADA sent from hospitals in Turkey to the Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency in 2018 were evaluated. Demographic data, previous treatment regimens and reasons for referral were extracted from the files of the cases. RESULTS: A total of 662 patients were considered for off-label use of IFX or ADA for the treatment of ocular Behçet's disease. The mean age of the patients was 35.7±10.8 years (range 12-76); 61.5% of patients were men and 38.5% were women. Of the applications, 345 (52.1%) were for IFX and 317 (47.9%) for ADA. Among the referring hospitals, the public university hospitals ranked first, accounting for 77.9% of IFX and 88.6% of ADA prescriptions. Most applications were made after the failure of conventional therapy, which included steroids and immunosuppressive agents. CONCLUSION: IFX and ADA are rarely used as initial therapy. Stepwise treatment is still preferred in the treatment of ocular Behçet's disease in Turkey. Our report informs on the management of this difficult-to-treat condition.

Comparative Efficacy of Biologic Therapies for Inducing Response and Remission in Fistulizing Crohn's Disease: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: The medical treatment of fistulizing Crohn's disease (CD) remains a challenge to clinicians. Over the last 20 years, biologic therapies have been the mainstay of medical treatment of fistulizing CD. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of biologic therapies in inducing response and remission in fistulizing CD. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central databases from inception to December 2021. Inclusion criteria were any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of biologic therapies against an active comparator or placebo for induction of response or remission in adults with fistulizing CD. The proportion of patients with fistula response or remission, as defined by each clinical trial, was our primary study outcome. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was used to measure treatment effects and results were reported as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: In our analysis, 10 studies were included, and all were RCTs. Infliximab was superior to adalimumab in inducing response (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.06-0.99) but not in inducing remission (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.04-2.27). Tumor necrosis factor antagonists were superior to placebo in the induction of response (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.750) and remission (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.22-0.58). Infliximab was superior to placebo in inducing response (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17-0.75) and remission (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.87). Ustekinumab was superior to placebo in inducing response (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.860) but not in inducing remission (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.13-1.93). When comparing biologic therapies against each other, there was no statistical difference in inducing remission. Vedolizumab was not superior to placebo in inducing remission (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.04-2.29). Certolizumab was not superior to placebo in inducing response (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.40-1.55) or remission (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.40-1.55). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor necrosis factor antagonists are effective in inducing response and remission in fistulizing CD. Infliximab was superior to adalimumab for inducing response but not for inducing remission. Ustekinumab is effective in the induction of response but not in the induction of remission. When compared against each other, biologic therapies showed no significant difference in the induction of remission. Based on the available data, infliximab is the preferred first-line treatment. As for other biologics, the limited published data do not allow us to make firm recommendations. This study supports current practice and emphasizes the need for dedicated RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of biologic therapies in fistulizing CD.

Despite the era of biologic therapies, the management of fistulizing Crohn's disease remains challenging. This is the first systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of biologic therapies in inducing response and remission in patients with fistulizing Crohn's disease. We found that anti-tumor necrosis factor agents are effective in inducing response and remission. Infliximab was superior to adalimumab for inducing response but not for inducing remission.

Is biologic therapy effective for antibiotic-refractory pouchitis?

MAIN TEXT INTRODUCTION: The use of biologic therapy for antibiotic-refractory pouchitis is controversial, due to few studies on the subject and lack of convincing results. OBJECTIVES: To study the efficacy of biologic therapy for refractory pouchitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, patient records at the Medical and Surgical departments in our hospital during an eleven-year period were scrutinized. 25 patients treated with biologics for refractory pouchitis were identified. RESULTS: The majority of these patients (n = 19, 76%) had either good or partial effect of biologic therapy for refractory pouchitis. Six of these patients did not respond until the second or third-line treatment. All naïve patients (n = 14) had good or partial response regardless if the diagnosis was idiopathic or Crohn's-like pouchitis. In comparison, only 45% (n = 5) of the patients with prior exposure to biologics (n = 11) had a positive response. Six of ten patients treated with second or third-line therapy had a good or partial response. All not naïve patients who had previously been treated with Infliximab (n = 9) had adverse reactions when the same drug was given for pouchitis. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study suggests that biologic therapy may be effective for both idiopathic and Crohn's-like refractory pouchitis. Naïve patients seem to respond more successfully than not naïve patients. In cases without response on first-line treatment should second-line treatment be considered. Due to the high risk of adverse reactions Infliximab should be avoided to not naïve patients.

Disease recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease after biologic therapy or surgery: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Relapse is a problem in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) after medical therapy (including biologics) and after surgery to treat acute inflammation. It is unclear whether the recurrence rate over time is higher after surgical therapy than after continuous drug treatment. AIM: We sought to compare clinical relapse rates and the need for re-interventions (resection or therapeutic endoscopic intervention) in patients with CD. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: The need for one of the three re-interventions (surgery, biologics or both) increased over time. The recurrence rates in patients after ileocecal resection were lower than the rates under biologic therapy. The odds ratio for clinical recurrence under biologics versus after surgical treatment was 2.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-4.08, p-value < 0.001). The odds ratio for surgical recurrence under biologics versus after surgery was 3.60 (95% CI 1.06-12.3, p-value 0.041). CONCLUSION: These findings support surgical resection as a treatment option in patients with CD with limited disease.

Tapering biologics in axial spondyloarthritis: A systematic literature review.

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of biologics has improved the management of patients with rheumatic disease, mainly with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Sustained remission has become a reachable goal thanks to the treat to target strategy. Contrary to rheumatoid arthritis, data on biologic optimization among SpA patients in remission is scarce and still a subject of debate. The main objective of this systematic review was to provide the most up-to-date published literature regarding biologic tapering in axial spondyloarthritis. METHODS: This systematic review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews guidelines. Original articles from Pubmed and Scopus, published until December 20th 2021, and tackling tapering strategies of the biologics in patients with axial SpA were included RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. They were published between 2008 and 2020. The most studied molecules were Etanercept (ETN) (n = 13), Infliximab (IFX) (n = 6), Adalimumab (ADA) (n = 5), certolizumab pegol (CZP) (n = 2), Golimumab (n = 1) and ETN biosimilar. There are no studies published regarding anti-IL 17 tapering strategy. Patient-tailored dose reduction of anti TNF-α agents was successful in preserving stable low disease activity in most of the studies with remission rates ranging between 20.2 % and 93.7 %. Complete treatment discontinuation is associated with a high risk of flares. CONCLUSION: To conclude, published data indicate that a progressive tapering strategy for anti TNF-α therapy is successful among axial SpA in sustained remission. However, further studies with more homogenized tapering strategies are needed in order to ascertain the specific implication of each subset for a better holistic approach.

Implications for sequencing of biologic therapy and choice of second anti-TNF in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: results from the IMmunogenicity to Second Anti-TNF therapy (IMSAT) therapeutic drug monitoring study.

BACKGROUND: Anti-drug antibodies are associated with treatment failure to anti-TNF agents in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). AIM: To assess whether immunogenicity to a patient's first anti-TNF agent would be associated with immunogenicity to the second, irrespective of drug sequence METHODS: We conducted a UK-wide, multicentre, retrospective cohort study to report rates of immunogenicity and treatment failure of second anti-TNF therapies in 1058 patients with IBD who underwent therapeutic drug monitoring for both infliximab and adalimumab. The primary outcome was immunogenicity to the second anti-TNF agent, defined at any timepoint as an anti-TNF antibody concentration ≥9 AU/ml for infliximab and ≥6 AU/ml for adalimumab. RESULTS: In patients treated with infliximab and then adalimumab, those who developed antibodies to infliximab were more likely to develop antibodies to adalimumab, than patients who did not develop antibodies to infliximab (OR 1.99, 95%CI 1.27-3.20, p = 0.002). Similarly, in patients treated with adalimumab and then infliximab, immunogenicity to adalimumab was associated with subsequent immunogenicity to infliximab (OR 2.63, 95%CI 1.46-4.80, p < 0.001). For each 10-fold increase in anti-infliximab and anti-adalimumab antibody concentration, the odds of subsequently developing antibodies to adalimumab and infliximab increased by 1.73 (95% CI 1.38-2.17, p < 0.001) and 1.99 (95%CI 1.34-2.99, p < 0.001), respectively. Patients who developed immunogenicity with undetectable drug levels to infliximab were more likely to develop immunogenicity with undetectable drug levels to adalimumab (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.39-4.19, p < 0.001). Commencing an immunomodulator at the time of switching to the second anti-TNF was associated with improved drug persistence in patients with immunogenic, but not pharmacodynamic failure. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of drug sequence, immunogenicity to the first anti-TNF agent was associated with immunogenicity to the second, which was mitigated by the introduction of an immunomodulator in patients with immunogenic, but not pharmacodynamic treatment failure.

Biologic Therapy for Budesonide-refractory, -dependent or -intolerant Microscopic Colitis: a Multicentre Cohort Study from the GETAID.

BACKGROUND: Budesonide remains the backbone therapy for microscopic colitis [MC]; however, relapses are frequent, and some patients are intolerant or dependent. Anti-TNF therapy is increasingly used to treat these patients, but available evidence is still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anti-TNF therapy in MC patients failing budesonide. METHODS: In a multicentre retrospective cohort study, budesonide-refractory, -dependent, or -intolerant MC patients treated with anti-TNF agents were included. Clinical remission was defined as fewer than three bowel movements per day, and clinical response was defined as an improvement in stool frequency of at least 50%. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included. Median age was 58.5 years, median disease duration was 25 months, and median follow-up was 29.5 months. Seven patients were treated with infliximab [IFX], and seven with adalimumab. Clinical remission without steroids at 12 weeks was reached in 5/14 [35.7%] patients; all of these received IFX. Clinical response at 12 and 52 weeks, was obtained in 9/14 [64.3%] and 7/14 [50%] patients, respectively. Five patients switched to another anti-TNF agent. When considering both first- and second-line anti-TNF therapies, 7 [50%] patients were in clinical remission at Week 52. Mild to moderate adverse events were reported in six ptients. Two patients were treated with vedolizumab, of whom one had clinical response; one patient treated with ustekinumab had no response. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first multicentre cohort study showing that half of patients treated with anti-TNF therapy for MC achieved clinical remission in case of budesonide failure.

Adalimumab or etanercept as first line biologic therapy in enthesitis related arthritis (ERA) - a drug-survival single centre study spanning 10 years.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse and compare drug-survival of adalimumab and etanercept (and their biosimilars) in biologic-naïve patients with ERA (Enthesitis-Related Arthritis). METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, conventional statistics and machine-learning were applied to compare drug-survival (adalimumab, etanercept and their biosimilars initiated: 2009-2019) in ERA and identify determinants. The primary outcome was discontinuation of treatment due to primary- or secondary-failure and adverse drug-reactions. RESULTS: During the observation period, 99 of 188 patients with ERA on first-line TNF inhibitors (etanercept-n=108, adalimumab-n=80) discontinued their treatment (median survival-time 3.9years, 95%CI 2.6-4.9years). Adalimumab was associated with longer drug-survival compared to etanercept especially after an initial positive response, with the median time to treatment discontinuation 4.9years (95% CI 3.9-5.7) for adalimumab, compared to 2years (95%CI 1.4-4.0) for etanercept (HR of treatment-discontinuation-0.49, 95%CI 0.32--0.75, p=0.001). Adjusted by propensity-score, adalimumab-methotrexate combination was associated with longer drug survival, compared to adalimumab-monotherapy (HR-0.41, 95%CI 0.20-0.85), etanercept-monotherapy (HR-0.28, 95%CI 0.15-0.53), and etanercept-methotrexate combination (HR-0.39, 95%CI 0.21-0.73). The presence of HLA-B27 was associated with longer drug-survival (HR-0.50, 95%CI 0.29-0.87) following an initial positive response. Higher-CRP at baseline was associated with higher rate of primary-failure (HR-1.68, 95%CI 1.08-2.62). Axial-ERA (sacroiliitis±spinal-involvement) was associated with poorer drug-survival for both primary- and secondary-failure (overall HR-2.03, 95%CI 1.22-3.40). Adjusted by propensity-score, shorter drug-survival was observed in patients with baseline-CRP≥12.15 mg/L, but only in the context of axial-ERA, not in peripheral-ERA (no sacroiliitis/spinal-involvement) (HR-2.28, 95%CI 1.13--3.64). CONCLUSION: Following an initial positive primary response, continuing methotrexate with adalimumab was associated with the longest drug-survival compared to adalimumab-monotherapy or etanercept-based regimens. Axial-ERA was associated with a poorer drug-survival. A CRP >12.15 in patients with axial-ERA was associated with a higher rate of primary-failure. Further prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Advancing Biologic Therapy for Refractory Autoimmune Hepatitis.

Biologic agents may satisfy an unmet clinical need for treatment of refractory autoimmune hepatitis. The goals of this review are to present the types and results of biologic therapy for refractory autoimmune hepatitis, indicate opportunities to improve and expand biologic treatment, and encourage comparative clinical trials. English abstracts were identified in PubMed by multiple search terms. Full-length articles were selected for review, and secondary and tertiary bibliographies were developed. Rituximab (monoclonal antibodies against CD20 on B cells), infliximab (monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor-alpha), low-dose recombinant interleukin 2 (regulatory T cell promoter), and belimumab (monoclonal antibodies against B cell activating factor) have induced laboratory improvement in small cohorts with refractory autoimmune hepatitis. Ianalumab (monoclonal antibodies against the receptor for B cell activating factor) is in clinical trial. These agents target critical pathogenic pathways, but they may also have serious side effects. Blockade of the B cell activating factor or its receptors may disrupt pivotal B and T cell responses, and recombinant interleukin 2 complexed with certain interleukin 2 antibodies may selectively expand the regulatory T cell population. A proliferation-inducing ligand that enhances T cell proliferation and survival is an unevaluated, potentially pivotal, therapeutic target. Fully human antibodies, expanded target options, improved targeting precision, more effective delivery systems, and biosimilar agents promise to improve efficacy, safety, and accessibility. In conclusion, biologic agents target key pathogenic pathways in autoimmune hepatitis, and early experiences in refractory disease encourage clarification of the preferred target, rigorous clinical trial, and comparative evaluations.

Biologic therapy in refractory neurobehçet's disease: a multicentre study of 41 patients and literature review.

OBJECTIVES: To assess efficacy and safety of biologic therapy (BT) in neurobehçet's disease (NBD) refractory to glucocorticoids and at least one conventional immunosuppressive drug. METHODS: Open-label, national, multicentre study. NBD diagnosis was based on the International Consensus Recommendation criteria. Outcome variables were efficacy and safety. Main efficacy outcome was clinical remission. Other outcome variables analysed were glucocorticoid-sparing effect and improvement in laboratory parameters. RESULTS: We studied 41 patients [21 women; age 40.6 (10.8) years]. Neurological damage was parenchymal (n = 33, 80.5%) and non-parenchymal (n = 17, 41.5%). First BTs used were infliximab (n = 19), adalimumab (n = 14), golimumab (n = 3), tocilizumab (n = 3) and etanercept (n = 2). After 6 months of BT, neurological remission was complete (n = 23, 56.1%), partial (n = 15, 37.6%) and no response (n = 3, 7.3%). In addition, median (IQR) dose of oral prednisone decreased from 60 (30-60) mg/day at the initial visit to 5 (3.8-10) mg/day after 6 months (P < 0.001). It was also the case for mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate [31.5 (25.6)-15.3 (11.9) mm/1st h, P = 0.011] and median (IQR) C-reactive protein [1.4 (0.2-12.8) to 0.3 (0.1-3) mg/dl, P = 0.001]. After a mean follow-up of 57.5 months, partial or complete neurological remission persisted in 37 patients (90.2%). BT was switched in 22 cases (53.6%) due to inefficacy (n = 16) or adverse events (AEs) (n = 6) and discontinued due to complete prolonged remission (n = 3) or severe AE (n = 1). Serious AEs were observed in two patients under infliximab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: BT appears to be effective and relatively safe in refractory NBD.

Efficacy and Safety of High-dose Cholecalciferol in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Infliximab.

OBJECTIVE: Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of high-dose, interval cholecalciferol administration in patients with IBD receiving infliximab. METHODS: This prospective, longitudinal, open-label study enrolled pediatric and young adult patients with IBD and vitamin D deficiency. Subjects received 50,000 IU every 4 to 5 weeks (n = 11) or 100,000 IU every 6 to 8 weeks (n = 32) of oral cholecalciferol for 1 year. Dosing was directly observed and administered in conjunction with infliximab infusions. The primary endpoint was vitamin D sufficiency, defined as a 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25-OHD) level ≥30 ng/mL. RESULTS: Forty-three participants constituted the primary analysis population. 25-OHD levels reached steady-state after the third dose, and mean increases in 25-OHD levels were 8 vs. 4.5 ng/mL in the 100,000 IU vs. 50,000 IU treatment groups, respectively. Only 43.8% of patients receiving 100,000 IU and 18.2% of patients receiving 50,000 IU achieved sufficiency. There was no difference in the 25-OHD level responsiveness in patients with Crohn disease versus those with ulcerative colitis (P = 0.72). There was no correlation between 25-OHD levels and clinical disease activity in patients with Crohn disease (P = 0.85) or ulcerative colitis (P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation with cholecalciferol was well-tolerated and direct observation is a promising paradigm for ensuring compliance with therapy. Patients with IBD, however, appear to require high doses of cholecalciferol, with less than half of patients (37% overall) achieving vitamin D sufficiency. Additional studies are necessary to determine the optimal treatment regimens.