Bleeding risk after acupuncture in patients taking anticoagulant drugs: A case control study based on real-world data.

OBJECTIVES: Patients on anticoagulant medications may be at a higher risk of bleeding after acupuncture. This study aimed to assess the association between anticoagulant drug use and bleeding after acupuncture. DESIGN: Case control study SETTING: We analysed the diagnosis and treatment records (2000-2018) of a random sample of two million patients from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. INTERVENTIONS: anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence rates of major (visceral bleeding or ruptured blood vessels requiring transfusion) and minor (skin bleeding or contusion) bleeding after acupuncture RESULTS: We included the records of 13,447,563 acupuncture sessions in 821,946 participants and followed up the patients for 14 days after each session. The incidence of minor bleeding was 8.31 per 10,000 needles, whereas that of major bleeding was 4.26 per 100,000 needles. Anticoagulants significantly increased the risk of minor bleeding (adjusted OR = 1.15 (1.03-1.28)), but the risk of major bleeding did not reach statistical significance (adjusted OR = 1.18 (0.8 0-1.75)). Anticoagulants, such as warfarin (adjusted OR = 4.95 (2.55-7.64)), direct oral anticoagulants (adjusted OR = 3.07 (1.23-5.47)), and heparin (adjusted OR = 3.72 (2.18-6.34)) significantly increased the risk of bleeding. However, antiplatelet drug was not significantly associated with post-acupuncture bleeding. Comorbidities including liver cirrhosis, diabetes, and coagulation defects, were the risk factors for bleeding after acupuncture. CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulant drugs may increase the risk of bleeding after acupuncture. We encourage physicians to ask patients in detail about their medical history and drug use prior to acupuncture treatment.

Occurrence of intraocular hemorrhages under monotherapy or combination therapy of antiplatelets and anticoagulants using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.

Purpose: An intraocular hemorrhage is an adverse event that can lead to visual acuity impairment. Antithrombotic therapy with antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants may increase intraocular hemorrhage. However, since their frequency is low, studies on the risk of intraocular hemorrhage with these drugs, especially under combination therapy, are limited. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of intraocular hemorrhages under monotherapy and combination therapy with antiplatelets and anticoagulants by analyzing a large pharmacovigilance database. Methods: Intraocular hemorrhage signals with oral antiplatelets and anticoagulants were evaluated by calculating reporting odds ratios and information components using the Japan Adverse Drug Reactions Report database from April 2004 to March 2022. In addition, differences in signals between younger and elderly patients, affecting factors, and time-to-onset from initial antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatments were analyzed. Results: Aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin, apixaban, and rivaroxaban, but not ticagrelor, ticlopidine, prasugrel, dabigatran, and edoxaban showed intraocular hemorrhage signals under monotherapy. In combination therapy, dual therapy (aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitors, warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants, and P2Y12 inhibitors + warfarin) and triple therapy (aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitors + warfarin) resulted in intraocular hemorrhage signals. Intraocular hemorrhage signals were observed in younger patients receiving monotherapy with aspirin and in elderly patients receiving monotherapy and combination therapy with warfarin. Affecting factors were diabetes mellitus in patients with prasugrel, use of medications for intravitreal injections, and posterior sub-Tenon injections with some antiplatelets and anticoagulants. The median period of intraocular hemorrhage occurrence after starting monotherapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin, or rivaroxaban was within 90 days. Conclusion: In addition to monotherapy with several antiplatelets and anticoagulants, combination therapy using aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, and warfarin has the potential risk of intraocular hemorrhage. Particular attention should be paid to the occurrence of intraocular hemorrhages in younger patients taking aspirin, in elderly patients taking warfarin, and within the first 90 days of antiplatelet and anticoagulant use.

Optimal Anticoagulation on TAVI Patients Based on Thrombotic and Bleeding Risk and the Challenge Beyond: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) has been established as the treatment of choice for symptomatic aortic stenosis, while it is expanding in all risk-related group categories of patients, gaining gradually ground over the surgical approach. However, complications and adverse events are yet to be effectively limited and diminished with thrombotic and hemorrhagic events being rooted as a crucial topic of discussion. Favorable anticoagulation pharmacotherapy options are constantly being revised and tested, whilst guidelines are being modified to meet current clinical evidence. This review aims to systematically assess already existing guidelines on anticoagulation in post-TAVI patients and examine novel regimens for the specific use, like apixaban, rivaroxaban, and other anticoagulants, essentially constructing a holistic point of view on future progress on this matter. The added complexity brought by coagulation-affecting comorbidities such as atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, and more contributes to the direct association of the topic to the quality of healthcare as a public service. The literature was systematically searched to examine the effectiveness and safety of various anticoagulation treatments and cross-evaluate them based on the according category of patients that were assigned to. Clinical trials, observational studies and systematic reviews were included and, eventually, conclusive remarks and future considerations were developed and presented. In the category of patients without prior indication to anticoagulation, SAPT was proven safer and still effective, when antiplatelet therapies were compared, while a comparison of antiplatelet versus anticoagulation strategies noted the first one, with limited data, as the optimal one. Lastly, direct oral anticoagulants were shown to be safe substitutes for vitamin K antagonists for patients with prior indication to anticoagulation.

Clopidogrel resistance is common in patients undergoing vascular and coronary interventions.

OBJECTIVES: "Clopidogrel resistance," also defined as heightened platelet reactivity (HPR) while on clopidogrel therapy, may lead to a sub-optimal antiplatelet effect and a potential thrombotic event. There is limited literature addressing the prevalence of HPR in a large cohort of patients receiving either coronary or endovascular interventions. METHODS: In a large integrated healthcare system, patients with a P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) test were identified. HPR was defined as a PRU ≥ 200 during clopidogrel therapy. Vascular and coronary interventions were identified utilizing CPT codes, HPR prevalence was calculated, and Fischer's exact test was used to determine significance. RESULTS: From an initial cohort of 2,405,957 patients (October 2014 to January 2020), we identified 3301 patients with PRU tests administered. Of these, 1789 tests had a PRU ≥ 200 (HPR overall prevalence, 54%). We then identified 1195 patients who underwent either an endovascular or coronary procedure and had a PRU measurement. This corresponded to 935 coronary and 260 endovascular interventions. In the coronary cohort, the HPR prevalence was 54% (503/935). In the vascular cohort, the HPR prevalence was 53% (137/260); there was no difference between cohorts in HPR prevalence (p = 0.78). CONCLUSION: "Clopidogrel resistance" or HPR was found to be present in nearly half of patients with cardiovascular disease undergoing intervention. Our data suggest HPR is more common in the cardiovascular patient population than previously appreciated. Evaluating patients for HPR is both inexpensive ($25) and rapid (< 10 min). Future randomized studies are warranted to determine whether HPR has a clinically detectable effect on revascularization outcomes.

To study the mechanism of panax notoginseng in the treatment of aspirin resistance in the secondary prevention of stroke based on TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway: A study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Aspirin, as an typical antiplatelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention, have been proved that can significantly reduce incidence and recurrence of cerebrovascular ischemic events. However, due to drugs biological characteristics, aspirin resistance (AR) often occurs in clinical practice, which significantly influence secondary prevention in stroke patients. The growing evidence of activating blood and removing stasis herbs medicine (Sanqi) for AR is promising. However, the efficacy and mechanism of Panax notoginseng (Sanqi) for AR in secondary stroke prevention has not been confirmed. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a prospective 2-center, assessor and statistician blinded, randomized, controlled trial. We will allocate 106 subjects aged between 45 and 65 years old, diagnosed with aspirin semi-resistance after stroke to 2 groups randomly in a ratio of 1:1. Patients in the experimental group will be treated with conventional treatments plus Panax notoginseng (Sanqi) while the others in the control group will be treated with only conventional treatments. All will be given different medications for 30 days. Patients will be measured with the platelet aggregation rate and serum TLR4, MyD88, NF-κB, COX-2, IL-6, CRP, TXB2 level for clinical efficacy and mechanisms at baseline and the 14th, 30th day of treatment. Baseline characteristics of patients will be summarized by groups and compared with Chi-square for categorical variables, and Student's independent t test or nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test for the continuous variables. Primary and secondary outcomes will be analyzed with 2-way repeated measures Anova, and Post Hoc test. CONCLUSION: The present study aims to investigate short-term add-on efficacy and mechanism of Panax notoginseng (Sanqi) for aspirin resistance in secondary stroke prevention via TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway. With this, we expect to find out an appropriate partial substitute of aspirin for aspirin resistance individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx) with the ID ChiCTR2100045773 at April 24, 2021.

ISTH guidelines for antithrombotic treatment in COVID-19.

Antithrombotic agents reduce risk of thromboembolism in severely ill patients. Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may realize additional benefits from heparins. Optimal dosing and timing of these treatments and benefits of other antithrombotic agents remain unclear. In October 2021, ISTH assembled an international panel of content experts, patient representatives, and a methodologist to develop recommendations on anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents for patients with COVID-19 in different clinical settings. We used the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association methodology to assess level of evidence (LOE) and class of recommendation (COR). Only recommendations with LOE A or B were included. Panelists agreed on 12 recommendations: three for non-hospitalized, five for non-critically ill hospitalized, three for critically ill hospitalized, and one for post-discharge patients. Two recommendations were based on high-quality evidence, the remainder on moderate-quality evidence. Among non-critically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19, the panel gave a strong recommendation (a) for use of prophylactic dose of low molecular weight heparin or unfractionated heparin (LMWH/UFH) (COR 1); (b) for select patients in this group, use of therapeutic dose LMWH/UFH in preference to prophylactic dose (COR 1); but (c) against the addition of an antiplatelet agent (COR 3). Weak recommendations favored (a) sulodexide in non-hospitalized patients, (b) adding an antiplatelet agent to prophylactic LMWH/UFH in select critically ill, and (c) prophylactic rivaroxaban for select patients after discharge (all COR 2b). Recommendations in this guideline are based on high-/moderate-quality evidence available through March 2022. Focused updates will incorporate future evidence supporting changes to these recommendations.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Antiplatelet Monotherapy Plus Oral Anticoagulation in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Coronary Artery Ectasia: Design and Rationale of OVER-TIME Randomized Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal anti-thrombotic therapy to prevent recurrent ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome and coronary artery ectasia (CAE) remains unclear. AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet plus anticoagulant therapy versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes and coronary artery ectasia. METHODS: OVER-TIME is an investigator initiated, exploratory, open label, single center, randomized clinical trial comparing dual antiplatelet therapy (acetyl-salicylic acid plus a P2Y12 inhibitor) with the combination of an antiplatelet monotherapy (a P2Y12 inhibitor) plus a low dose anticoagulant (rivaroxaban, 15mg oral dose) for the prevention of recurrent ischemic events among patients with CAE. We aim to enroll approximately 60 patients with CAE and acute coronary syndromes. After recruitment, patients are randomized to (a) standard of care (dual antiplatelet regimen) or (b) the combination of antiplatelet monotherapy and low dose anticoagulant. Patients will be followed for at least 12 months. The OVER-TIME study aims to assess the efficacy of the regimen in prevention of major cardiovascular events and its security in bleeding events in acute coronary syndromes among patients with CAE. Expected results and conclusions: OVER-TIME is the first randomized controlled trial to assess different antithrombotic strategies in patients with CAE and acute coronary syndrome, and its results will offer preliminary data for the prevention of major cardiovascular events and bleeding events in this group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05233124 (ClinicalTrials.gov), date of registration: February 10, 2022.

Distinct Approaches to Perioperative Management of Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy among Providers Performing Cutaneous Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing cross-collaboration between providers who perform cutaneous surgery, a disparity still exists in the current practices regarding perioperative management. This could lead to treatment delays, patient confusion, and increased morbidity, such as clotting, infection, and discomfort of patients. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the management practices of different providers in regards to perioperative anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for cutaneous surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study used an electronic survey to assess current perioperative management practices of dermatologic surgeons and plastic and reconstructive surgeons. RESULTS: 177 physicians (115 dermatologic surgeons and 62 plastic and reconstructive surgeons) responded to the survey. For all therapeutic agents, dermatologic surgeons were significantly more likely than their plastic and reconstructive surgery colleagues to continue all anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents perioperatively for cutaneous surgery (vitamin K antagonists, antiplatelets, LMWH, direct Xa inhibitors, direct thrombin inhibitors, NSAIDS: P<0.001; fish oil, vitamin E: P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Our data highlight the significant practice gaps that exist between dermatologic surgeons and plastic and reconstructive surgeons. Reducing this disparity will facilitate improved continuity of care, especially when patients are referred from dermatologic surgeons to plastic and reconstructive surgeons for more complex repairs, and potentially reduce morbidity and mortality associated with medication discontinuation. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(7):766-772. doi:10.36849/JDD.6726.

Thrombosis within the left anterior descending coronary artery and left ventricle after high-dose nitrous oxide use.

We present a man in his 30s with acute anterior myocardial infarction due to thrombotic occlusion of the left anterior descending artery and subsequent left ventricular thrombus formation after high-dose recreational use of nitrous oxide (N2O). Initial questioning for use of illicit substances was negative, but low vitamin B12 levels and severely elevated homocysteine levels prompted us to interrogate for the use of laughing gas. On questioning, the patient admitted to have used this substance, which he presumed to be innocent. Neither percutaneous coronary intervention with balloon dilatation nor intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, nor continuous use of anticoagulation and double antiplatelet therapy resulted in thrombus resolution. Due to a severely reduced left ventricular function, despite 3 months on heart failure therapy, the patient is being counselled for intracardiac defibrillator implantation. We conclude that N2O, notably when consumed in conjunction with other proatherogenic substances, is associated with thrombosis: a relation possibly mediated by severe hyperhomocysteinaemia.

Prophylactic Rivaroxaban Therapy for Left Ventricular Thrombus After Anterior ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of rivaroxaban on left ventricle thromboprophylaxis in patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: Anterior STEMI is associated with an increased risk of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) formation. The contemporary role of prophylactic rivaroxaban therapy remains unclear. METHODS: We randomly assigned 279 patients with anterior STEMI who had undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention to receive, in a 1:1 ratio, low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily for 30 days) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or only DAPT. The primary efficacy outcome was the LVT formation within 30 days. Net clinical adverse events were assessed at 30 days and 180 days, including all-cause mortality, LVT, systemic embolism, rehospitalization for cardiovascular events, and bleeding. RESULTS: The addition of low-dose rivaroxaban to DAPT reduced LVT formation within 30 days compared with only DAPT (0.7% vs 8.6%; HR: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.01-0.62; P = 0.015; P < 0.001 for superiority). Net clinical adverse events were lower within 30 days in the rivaroxaban group versus those in the only DAPT group and remained relatively low throughout the follow-up period. There were no significant differences in bleeding events between the 2 groups in 30 days and 180 days. However, 1 case of intracranial hemorrhage (major bleeding) occurred in the rivaroxaban group within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our results supported that the short-duration addition of low-dose rivaroxaban to DAPT could prevent LVT formation in patients with anterior STEMI following primary percutaneous coronary intervention. A larger multiple-institution study is necessary to determine the generalizability.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Peripheral Artery Disease: Risk Stratification and Clinical Decision Making.

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are an underrecognised group with significant thrombotic risk. This risk is modifiable with the use of aggressive secondary preventative efforts, including optimisation of antithrombotic therapy. Appropriate antithrombotic selection for patients with PAD requires appropriate assessment of thrombotic and bleeding risk. Recent Canadian guidelines have recommended dual pathway therapy initiation for stable PAD and post-revascularisation patients. However, there is ongoing discussion about how to identify PAD patients who stand to benefit most from these therapies while trying to minimise harm from bleeding. Clinical equipoise also persists around questions such as the utility of dual antiplatelet therapy in conjunction with rivaroxaban after high-risk endovascular interventions and the optimal therapy for patients experiencing acute limb ischemia. In patients with chronic PAD and high-risk comorbidities or limb features, or in patients after revascularisation, dual pathway therapy with low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin has emerged as the only regimen to reduce major adverse cardiovascular and limb events while maintaining an acceptable bleeding profile. After endovascular revascularisation, limited-duration (< 30 days) clopidogrel may be added to rivaroxaban and aspirin in selected high-risk patients at the provider's discretion. After acute limb ischemia, the risk of another vascular event is exceptionally high, but there is no high-quality evidence to guide decision making for intensified antithrombotic therapy. Randomised investigations addressing this question are urgently needed to better serve this high-risk and vulnerable population.

Antiplatelet and myocardial protective effect of Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pill in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity could be partially explained by loss-of-function alleles of CYP2C19, the enzyme that converts clopidogrel into its active form. Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pill (STDP) is a traditional Chinese medicine to treat angina pectoris. STDP has been shown to improve blood flow in patients with slow coronary flow and attenuate atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. However, whether STDP can affect platelet function remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to examine the potential effects of STDP on platelet function in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unstable angina. The interaction between the effects of STDP with polymorphisms of CYP2C19 was also investigated. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: This was a single-center, randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing elective PCI for unstable angina. Eligible subjects were randomized to receive STDP (210 mg per day) plus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel and aspirin or DAPT alone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was platelet function, reflected by adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation and platelet microparticles (PMPs). The secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including recurrent ischemia or myocardial infarction, repeat PCI and cardiac death; blood biomarkers for myocardial injury including creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme (CK-MB) and high-sensitive troponin I (hsTnI); and biomarkers for inflammation including intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and galectin-3. RESULTS: A total of 118 subjects (mean age: [66.8 ± 8.9] years; male: 59.8%) were included into analysis: 58 in the control group and 60 in the STDP group. CYP2C19 genotype distribution was comparable between the 2 groups. In comparison to the control group, the STDP group had significantly lower CK-MB (P < 0.05) but similar hsTnI (P > 0.05) at 24 h after PCI, lower ICAM-1, VCAM-1, MCP-1 and galectin-3 at 3 months (all P < 0.05) but not at 7 days after PCI (P > 0.05). At 3 months, the STDP group had lower PMP number ([42.9 ± 37.3] vs. [67.8 ± 53.1] counts/µL in the control group, P = 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that STDP increased percentage inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation only in slow metabolizers (66.0% ± 20.8% in STDP group vs. 36.0% ± 28.1% in the control group, P < 0.05), but not in intermediate or fast metabolizers. The rate of MACEs during the 3-month follow-up did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: STDP produced antiplatelet, anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective effects. Subgroup analysis indicated that STDP inhibited residual platelet reactivity in slow metabolizers only. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on www.chictr.org.cn: ChiCTR-IPR-16009785.

The impact of kidney function in patients on antithrombotic therapy: a post hoc subgroup analysis focusing on recurrent bleeding events from the AFIRE trial.

BACKGROUND: The success of antithrombotic therapies is assessed based on thrombotic and bleeding events. Simultaneously assessing both kinds of events might be challenging, and recurrent bleeding events are often ignored. We tried to confirm the effects of kidney function on outcome events in patients undergoing antithrombotic therapy. METHODS: As a post hoc subgroup analysis of the Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events with Rivaroxaban in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) trial, a randomized clinical trial with a median follow-up of 36 months, patients were divided into high and low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) groups with a cutoff value of 50 mL/min. The cumulative incidence of bleeding and crude incidence of recurrent bleeding per 100 patient-years were calculated. We used the Cox regression model with multiple failure time data for recurrent bleeding events. RESULTS: Among 2092 patients, 1386 (66.3%) showed high eGFR. The cumulative bleeding events per 100 patients at 1 year were 5.4 and 6.2 in the high and low eGFR groups, respectively. The difference continued to increase over time. The hazard ratio for time to the first bleeding event in the high eGFR group was 0.875 (95% confidence interval 0.701-1.090, p = .234) and that for the first composite event was 0.723 (95% confidence interval 0.603-0.867, p < .000). The recurrent bleeding events per 100 person-years were 11.3 and 15.3 in the high and low eGFR groups, respectively, with a rate ratio of 0.738 (95% confidence interval 0.615-0.886, p = .001). During the observation period, the risk of bleeding changed with time. It peaked soon after the study enrollment in both groups. It decreased continuously in the high eGFR group but remained high in the low eGFR group. CONCLUSIONS: We reaffirmed that kidney function affects bleeding events in patients on antithrombotic therapy, considering recurrent events. Patients should have detailed discussions with physicians regarding the possible bleeding events when continuing antithrombotic therapy, especially in patients with decreased kidney function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000016612 . ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02642419 . Registered on 21 October 2015.

Novel bleeding prediction model in atrial fibrillation patients on new oral anticoagulants.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical models such as the HAS-BLED (standing for Hypertension, Abnormal liver/renal function, Stroke history, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drug/alcohol usage) were developed to predict risk of major bleeding on vitamin K antagonists/antiplatelet therapy. We aimed to develop a model that will improve the ability to predict major bleeding events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with new oral anticoagulants (NOACs). METHODS: Clalit Health Services is the largest of four integrated healthcare organisations in Israel, which insures 4.7 million patients (53% of the population). We identified in Clalit Health Services all patients with AF, new users of an NOAC (2013-2017), and followed them until first occurrence of a major bleeding event, death, switch to another oral anticoagulant, 30 days after discontinuation of NOAC or end of follow-up (31 December 2019). Importance of the candidate model variables was estimated by inclusion frequencies across forward selection algorithm applied to 50 bootstrap samples. Then, backward selection algorithm using the modified Bayesian Information Criterion for competing risks was applied to select predictors for the final model. RESULTS: 47 623 patients with AF prescribed NOAC were studied. 28 055 patients with AF, initiators of apixaban (mean age 78.7, SD 9.0), were included in the first phase and had 662 major bleeding events. Nine variables were selected for inclusion in a final points-based risk-scoring system: male sex, anaemia, thrombocytopaenia (<99×103/µL), concurrent antiplatelet therapy, hypertension, prior major bleeding, risk factors for a fall, low cholesterol level and low estimated glomerular filtration rate, with apparent area-under-curve (AUC) of 0.6546. Applicability of the model was then shown for 14 118 and 5450 patients with AF, initiators of dabigatran and rivaroxaban, where the score achieved c indices of 0.62 and 0.61, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We present a novel and simple risk score for prediction of major bleeding in patients with non-valvular AF treated with NOACs. Validation in additional cohorts is warranted.

Antiplatelet and myocardial protective effect of Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pill in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled trial / 中西医结合学报

BACKGROUND@#High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity could be partially explained by loss-of-function alleles of CYP2C19, the enzyme that converts clopidogrel into its active form. Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pill (STDP) is a traditional Chinese medicine to treat angina pectoris. STDP has been shown to improve blood flow in patients with slow coronary flow and attenuate atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. However, whether STDP can affect platelet function remains unknown.@*OBJECTIVE@#The purpose of this study is to examine the potential effects of STDP on platelet function in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unstable angina. The interaction between the effects of STDP with polymorphisms of CYP2C19 was also investigated.@*DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION@#This was a single-center, randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing elective PCI for unstable angina. Eligible subjects were randomized to receive STDP (210 mg per day) plus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel and aspirin or DAPT alone.@*MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES@#The primary outcome was platelet function, reflected by adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation and platelet microparticles (PMPs). The secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including recurrent ischemia or myocardial infarction, repeat PCI and cardiac death; blood biomarkers for myocardial injury including creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme (CK-MB) and high-sensitive troponin I (hsTnI); and biomarkers for inflammation including intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and galectin-3.@*RESULTS@#A total of 118 subjects (mean age: [66.8 ± 8.9] years; male: 59.8%) were included into analysis: 58 in the control group and 60 in the STDP group. CYP2C19 genotype distribution was comparable between the 2 groups. In comparison to the control group, the STDP group had significantly lower CK-MB (P < 0.05) but similar hsTnI (P > 0.05) at 24 h after PCI, lower ICAM-1, VCAM-1, MCP-1 and galectin-3 at 3 months (all P < 0.05) but not at 7 days after PCI (P > 0.05). At 3 months, the STDP group had lower PMP number ([42.9 ± 37.3] vs. [67.8 ± 53.1] counts/μL in the control group, P = 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that STDP increased percentage inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation only in slow metabolizers (66.0% ± 20.8% in STDP group vs. 36.0% ± 28.1% in the control group, P < 0.05), but not in intermediate or fast metabolizers. The rate of MACEs during the 3-month follow-up did not differ between the two groups.@*CONCLUSION@#STDP produced antiplatelet, anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective effects. Subgroup analysis indicated that STDP inhibited residual platelet reactivity in slow metabolizers only.@*TRIAL REGISTRATION@#This study was registered on www.chictr.org.cn: ChiCTR-IPR-16009785.

Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Prior Atherothrombotic Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of the AFIRE Trial.

Background Among patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease, those with histories of atherothrombotic disease are at high-risk for future ischemic events. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban monotherapy in patients with atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, and histories of atherothrombotic disease. Methods and Results This was a post hoc subanalysis of the AFIRE (Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease) trial. Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease were recruited and randomized to receive the rivaroxaban monotherapy or combination therapy with rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet drug. For the purpose of this sub-study, participants were divided into 2 subgroups, including the atherothrombosis group (those with histories of myocardial infarction, stroke, and/or peripheral artery disease; n=1052, 47.5%) and non-atherothrombosis group (n=1163, 52.5%). The efficacy end point included cardiovascular events or all-cause death, while the safety end point was major bleeding. Net adverse events consisted of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major bleeding. In the atherothrombosis group, rivaroxaban monotherapy was significantly associated with a lower risk of net adverse events when compared with combination therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.34-0.74; P<0.001), with a decrease in both efficacy (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.99; P=0.044) and safety (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.71; P=0.003) end points. By contrast, there were no differences between treatment outcomes for the non-atherothrombosis group. Conclusions Rivaroxaban monotherapy significantly reduced net adverse events as compared with combination therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, and prior atherothrombotic disease. Registration URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique identifier: UMIN000016612. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02642419.

Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban Compared with Other Therapies Used in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Undergoing Peripheral Revascularization: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The guidelines on antithrombotic treatment in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) undergoing peripheral revascularization of the lower extremities were developed based on heterogeneous trials, assessing various dose regimens and recruiting patients who were subjected to different revascularization procedures. OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and safety of treatments used in patients with PAD undergoing peripheral revascularization accounting for between-trial heterogeneity and large dispersion of the quality of evidence. METHODS: A systematic literature review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting adult patients with PAD receiving antithrombotics was conducted until January 2020. Hazard ratios (HR) were pooled using Bayesian network meta-analysis. The estimated between-treatment effects were presented as HR together with 95% credible intervals. The base case analysis included studies recruiting patients following recent peripheral revascularization, who received treatment regimens administered within the recommended therapeutic window, while a sensitivity scenario included all identified trials. RESULTS: Thirteen RCTs were identified (8 RCTs enrolled patients following peripheral revascularization and 5 RCTs regardless of the previous revascularization). Five trials, recruiting an overall of 8349 patients, were considered for the base case analysis. Of those, 6564 patients were recruited in the VOYAGER PAD trial comparing rivaroxaban plus aspirin (RIV plus ASA) versus ASA. RIV plus ASA was associated with a lower risk of repeated peripheral revascularization versus ASA monotherapy (HR = 0.88 [0.79, 0.99]), however having a trend towards an increased rate of major bleeding (HR = 1.43 [0.98, 2.11]). There was no evidence for differences between RIV plus ASA and dual antiplatelet therapy and vitamin K antagonists plus ASA. Similar results were observed in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: RIV plus ASA is associated with reduced risk of revascularization compared with ASA monotherapy, but the evidence for other comparators, in particular antiplatelet regimens, was insufficient to guide treatment decisions and highlights the challenge in establishing the magnitude of comparative efficacy using existing RCTs.

Antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a treatment option for symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis who are candidates for a bioprosthesis across the entire spectrum of risk. However, TAVR carries a risk for thrombotic and bleeding events, underscoring the importance of defining the optimal adjuvant antithrombotic regimen. Antithrombotic considerations are convoluted by the fact that many patients undergoing TAVR are generally elderly and present with multiple comorbidities, including conditions that may require long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) (eg, atrial fibrillation) and antiplatelet therapy (eg, coronary artery disease). After TAVR among patients without baseline indications for OAC, recent data suggest dual-antiplatelet therapy to be associated with an increased risk for bleeding events, particularly early postprocedure, compared with single-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin. Concerns surrounding the potential for thrombotic complications have raised the hypothesis of adjunctive use of OAC for patients with no baseline indications for anticoagulation. Although effective in modulating thrombus formation at the valve level, the bleeding hazard has shown to be unacceptably high, and the net benefit of combining antiplatelet and OAC therapy is unproven. For patients with indications for the use of long-term OAC, such as those with atrial fibrillation, the adjunctive use of antiplatelet therapy increases bleeding. Whether direct oral anticoagulant agents achieve better outcomes than vitamin K antagonists remains under investigation. Overall, single-antiplatelet therapy and OAC appear to be reasonable strategies in patients without and with indications for concurrent anticoagulation. The aim of the present review is to appraise the current published research and recommendations surrounding the management of antithrombotic therapy after TAVR, with perspectives on evolving paradigms and ongoing trials.