Onset of Pyoderma Gangrenosum in Patients on Biologic Therapies: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize clinical outcomes of paradoxical pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) onset in patients on biologic therapy. METHODS: The authors conducted MEDLINE and EMBASE searches using PRISMA guidelines to include 57 patients (23 reports). RESULTS: Of the included patients, 71.9% (n = 41/57) noted PG onset after initiating rituximab, 21.1% (n = 12/57) noted tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors, 5.3% (n = 3/57) reported interleukin 17A inhibitors, and 1.8% (n = 1/57) reported cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 antibodies. The majority of patients (94.3%) discontinued biologic use. The most common medications used to resolve rituximab-associated PG were intravenous immunoglobulins, oral corticosteroids, and antibiotics, with an average resolution time of 3.3 months. Complete resolution of PG in TNF-α-associated cases occurred within an average of 2.2 months after switching to another TNF-α inhibitor (n = 1), an interleukin 12/23 inhibitor (n = 2), or treatment with systemic corticosteroids and cyclosporine (n = 3), systemic corticosteroids alone (n = 1), or cyclosporine alone (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Further investigations are warranted to determine whether PG onset is associated with underlying comorbidities, the use of biologic agents, or a synergistic effect. Nevertheless, PG may develop in patients on rituximab or TNF-α inhibitors, suggesting the need to monitor and treat such adverse effects.

Terapias biológicas y tuberculosis en pediatría / Biological therapies and tuberculosis in pediatrics

En los últimos años, ha habido un aumento sostenido del uso de terapias inmunomoduladoras como las terapias biológicas y en un período más reciente, de las terapias con moléculas pequeñas. Estos tratamientos constituyen un factor de riesgo más para enfermar de tuberculosis en adultos y aunque en menor grado, también en niños, especialmente con el uso de anti TNF-α, por lo que antes de iniciar una terapia biológica, hay que descartar la tuberculosis activa y la latente. En el tratamiento de una tuberculosis activa producida por un biológico se debe prolongar la etapa de continuación a 9 meses. Es importante el seguimiento clínico prolongado en años de quienes usan o han completado el uso de estas terapias. Hay que posponer la vacunación BCG en los hijos de madres que usaron terapias biológicas durante la gestación hasta la edad 6 a 12 meses de los niños. El foco de esta revisión está centrado en la tuberculosis por progresión de una forma latente a una activa o por un contacto estrecho con una persona con tuberculosis pulmonar en pacientes que reciben terapias biológicas anti TNF alfa de uso inmunoreumatológico.

In recent years, there has been a sustained increase in the use of immunomodulatory therapies such as biologic therapies and, more recently, small molecule therapies. Those therapies have become another risk factor for tuberculosis in adults and, although to lesser degree, also in children, especially some of them, such as anti-TNF α. Before starting biological therapy, active tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis must be ruled out. In the treatment of active tuberculosis caused by a biologic, the continuation stage should be extended to 9 months. Long-term clinical follow-up in years of those who use them or have completed their use, is important. BCG vaccine should be postponed in children of mother who used biologic therapies during pregnancy until the children ́s age 6 to 12 months. The focus of this review is centered on tuberculosis due to progression from a latent to an active form or due to close contact with a person with pulmonary tuberculosis in patients receiving anti-TNF alpha biological therapies for immunorheumatology use.

The incidence of psoriasis among smokers and/or former smokers inflammatory bowel diseases patients treated with tumor necrosis factor antagonist: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) refer to the classic drugs to treat moderate-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which have been proven to be effective to control IBD. However, the side effects exerted by IFX and ADA should be monitored in therapies, especially the paradoxical reaction of the skin system (e.g., psoriasis). Psoriasis is recognized as the most common skin lesion, capable of significantly affecting the quality of patients' life. METHODS: This study searched literatures published in English language with the qualifications on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Google, and Geenmedical databases. Over 2 co-authors assessed the quality of the articles and extracted the data independently. The data acquired were statistically analyzed with the statistical software of Revman and Stata. RESULTS: The ADA Group achieved a higher incidence of psoriasis (odds ratio [OR] = 0.658, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.471-0.919]); Females achieved a higher incidence of psoriasis than males (OR = 1.941, 95%CI [1.326-2.843], P < .05); Smoking up-regulated the incidence of psoriasis (OR = 1.679, 95%CI [1.237-2.279], P < .05); The interval of medication was over 1 year, and the interval of medication applying IFX was longer than that of the ADA Group; most cases could be relieved by using local hormone, phototherapy, or systemic hormone therapy under the strategy of biological agents. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of reported in IBD exceeds those of other autoimmune diseases, and the ADA treatment for IBD is safer than IFX. Psoriasis is more common in females than in males. Smoking refers to one of risk factors of psoriasis.

Considering a Biologic: What's a Clinician to Do? Management of Biologics in Surgery, Vaccinations, and Cancer.

In the past two decades, biologic therapy has become ubiquitous in the treatment of psoriasis; however, important considerations should be taken with regard to biologic use in the context of surgery, vaccinations, and cancers. With conflicting evidence on the effects of perioperative biologic use, we recommend withholding tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitor therapy for one dose prior to surgical procedures.1 Although no studies have shown a direct link between live vaccines and infection in patients receiving biologics, due to the theoretical risk of live vaccines producing infection in patients with altered immune responses, we recommend withholding biologic therapy for 4 to 5 half-lives prior to the administration of live or live-attenuated vaccines.2,3 Finally, although an increased rate of cancer recurrence has not been demonstrated with biologic use, experts recommend withholding biologic therapy for 2 years after the completion of treatment for invasive cancers and 5 years after the completion of treatment for aggressive malignancies (including melanomas, breast cancers, sarcomas, urinary tract cancers, and myelomas)4; however, exceptions should be considered depending on the patient's circumstances and severity of the psoriasis. (SKINmed. 2021;19:17-0).

A More Severe Non-melanoma Skin Cancer Phenotype Is Seen in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Antagonists.

BACKGROUND: Limited data suggest that non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) risk is higher in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) particularly in those on a tumor necrosis factor-α antagonist (TNF antagonist). It remains unknown whether TNF antagonist exposure alters the clinical course of NMSC in patients with IBD or if this therapy should be discontinued. AIMS: To assess the impact of TNF antagonist exposure on NMSC severity, recurrence and need for ancillary treatments. METHODS: Patients with IBD seen at London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada were assessed for a history of NMSC and pre-diagnosis TNF antagonist exposure. NMSC severity (low risk and high risk), ancillary NMSC therapies, including chemo or radiotherapy, and changes to IBD therapy were assessed. RESULTS: Eleven of 472 patients with IBD reviewed were diagnosed with NMSC. Sixty-four percent (7/11) were on a TNF antagonist at the time of NMSC diagnosis. All patients with TNF antagonist exposure, (7/7) presented with a high-risk lesion based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines. The incidence of positive margins was 42.9% (3/7) and 14.3% (1/7) required ancillary therapy. No metastatic disease was seen. TNF antagonist therapy was discontinued in a single patient due to NMSC diagnosis. Recurrent NMSC lesions were not seen in any of the TNF antagonist exposed patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this case series, TNF antagonist exposure may be associated with a severe NMSC clinical course. Larger studies are needed to confirm whether TNF antagonist discontinuation should be considered in the setting of NMSC diagnosis in IBD.

Anti-TNF agent etanercept augments UV-induced skin cancer development in SKH-1 mice.

BACKGROUND: Despite being employed in the treatment of inflammatory disorders for more than 20 years all over the world, data regarding photocarcinogenic risks of anti-TNF agents is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To assess photocarcinogenic potential of anti-TNF agents. METHODS: This was a placebo controlled, split-body (UVB-treated versus -untreated) study on mice. Treatment groups were infliximab (n = 11), etanercept (n = 11), cyclosporine (n = 11) and vehicle control (n = 11). Agents were introduced on the 10th week of phototherapy and continued through 24th week. The macroscopic, histological and immunohistochemical analysis of test sites were carried out. RESULTS: Overall 132 tumors were detected on test sites. All of these tumors developed on UV-exposed sides. Histologic examination of these tumors was compatible with keratinocytic neoplasia in 128, mastocytosis in 3, epidermal cyst in 1. Median tumor burden in the UVB exposed areas for ETN, IFX, CYC, and control groups were 14.91, 10.20, 6.28, and 3.14 cm2, respectively. ETN group demonstrated both higher tumor burden and keratinocytic neoplasia numbers than controls (p = .03, p = .025). Although there were 1.8 and 1.7 times more keratinocytic neoplasms in IFX and CYC groups compared to controls, these differences didn't reach statistically significant levels (p = .14; p = .19). CONCLUSION: This study points out to a significant photocarcinogenic potential of anti-TNF agent etanercept.

Metabolic, pharmacokinetic, and toxicological issues of biologic therapies currently used in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa.

INTRODUCTION: Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic, relapsing, debilitating inflammatory dermatologic disease of the terminal hair follicles at intertriginous sites clinically characterized by painful inflammatory nodules, abscesses, draining sinus tracts, and dermal fibrosis. The management of hidradenitis suppurativa is a challenge and usually consists of both medical and surgical approaches, which must often be combined for best outcome. The introduction of biological therapies, specifically TNFα-inhibitors such as adalimumab, has profoundly changed the therapeutic armamentarium of the disease. AREAS COVERED: The PubMed database was searched using combinations of the following keywords: hidradentis suppurativa, biologic therapy, TNF-α inhibitors, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, adverse effects, pharmacodynamics, pharmacology, adverse events, pharmacokinetics, drug interaction. This article reviews and updates the chemistry, pharmacokinetics, mechanism of action, adverse effects, drug interactions of on-label and off-label use of TNF-α inhibitors in HS. EXPERT OPINION: Biologic agents, particularly adalimumab, exhibit clinical efficacy in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. Careful patient selection and close monitoring during treatment are mandatory to provide safe and effective use of the TNF-α inhibitor. Familiarity with biologic agents is crucial because these agents could become a consolidated treatment option in the clinician's therapeutic approaches.

Assessment of Body Weight Changes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Initiating Biologic Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have inconsistently suggested that biologic therapy may be associated with weight gain in inflammatory bowel disease patients (IBD). Our aim was to compare weight gain across different biologic therapy classes with distinct mechanisms of action. METHODS: This prospective cohort study recruited patients with moderate to severe IBD initiating outpatient biologic therapy with anti-TNF (infliximab, adalimumab), vedolizumab, or ustekinumab. Weight measurements were performed at weeks 0, 14, 30, and 54. Changes in weight between baseline and each of the follow-up visits were modeled as a continuous variable, and multivariate regression assessed the independent effect of therapeutic class on this outcome. RESULTS: Our study enrolled 269 patients (163 CD, 106 UC) initiating biologic therapy [99 anti-TNF (37%), 122 vedolizumab (45%), 48 ustekinumab (18%)]. From baseline, the weight significantly increased at week 14 with a mean of 0.36 kg (± 3.8 kg, p = 0.004) and continued to increase compared to baseline with 0.96 kg (± 3.9 kg, p < 0.001) and 1.29 kg (± 4.2 kg, p < 0.001) at week 30 and 54, respectively. On univariate and multivariable analysis, no significant differences between any of the biologic therapies for weight gain were seen at any time point (weight gain anti-TNF: 0.31 kg, 1.06 kg, 1.33 kg; VDZ: 0.30 kg, 0.83 kg, 1.10 kg; UST: 0.63 kg, 1.21 kg, 2.31 kg at wk 14, wk 30, and wk 54, respectively). None of the disease activity parameters showed any statistical association with weight gain. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in weight gain among the different biologic therapeutic classes.

Gastrointestinal perforations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Sweden: a nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare incidence rates of gastrointestinal (GI) perforations between patients with RA and the general population, and between patients treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and non-TNFi biologics. METHODS: In this nationwide cohort study, a total of 63 532 patients with RA, with 26 050 biological treatment episodes (TNFi, rituximab, abatacept or tocilizumab) and 76 304 general population controls, were followed between 2009 and 2017 until the first outcome event. The main outcome was hospitalisation or death due to lower GI perforations, identified according to a prespecified list of ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision) codes. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used for adjustment. RESULTS: The sex-standardised and age-standardised incidence rates of lower GI perforations were 1.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3) events per 1000 person-years among general population controls, 1.6 (1.5-1.7) among bionaïve patients and ranged from 1.8 (1.4-3.6) (TNFi) to 4.5 (2.7-10.4) (tocilizumab) among biologics-treated patients. After adjustment for glucocorticoid use, the risk in bionaïve, TNFi-treated, abatacept-treated or rituximab-treated patients with RA was no longer different from the general population, while for tocilizumab it remained significantly higher. Comparing tocilizumab to TNFi, the adjusted HR for lower GI perforations was 2.2 (1.3-3.8), corresponding to one additional GI perforation per 451 patient-years treated with tocilizumab instead of TNFi. CONCLUSION: Tocilizumab was associated with a higher risk of lower GI perforations compared with alternative biologics. In absolute numbers, the risk remained low on all biologics commonly used to treat RA, but the accumulated evidence across settings and outcome definitions supports that this risk should be considered in treatment guidelines for RA.

Predicting response to anti-TNFα therapy among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA): results from BSRBR-AS.

OBJECTIVES: While many axSpA patients, eligible to receive anti-TNFα therapy, derive benefit when prescribed them, some patients do not. The current study aims to identify modifiable targets to improve outcome as well as non-modifiable targets that identify groups less likely to derive benefit. METHODS: The BSRBR-AS is a prospective cohort study of axSpA patients who, at recruitment, were naïve to biologic therapy. Those in the 'biologic' sub-cohort commenced their first anti-TNFα therapy at recruitment or during follow-up. Prior to commencement, information was collected on socio-economic, clinical and patient-reported factors. Outcome was assessed according to ASAS20, ASAS40, ASDAS reduction and achieving a moderate/inactive ASDAS disease state. RESULTS: 335 participants commenced their first anti-TNFα therapy and were followed up at a median of 14 (inter-quartile range 12-17) weeks. Response varied between 33% and 52% according to criteria used. Adverse socio-economic factors, fewer years in education predicted lower likelihood of response across outcome measures as did not working full-time. Co-morbidities and poor mental health were clinical and patient-reported factors, respectively, associated with lack of response. The models, particularly those using ASDAS, were good at predicting those who did not respond (negative predictive value (NPV) 77%). CONCLUSION: Some factors predicting non-response (such as mental health) are modifiable but many (such as social/economic factors) are not modifiable in clinic. They do, however, identify patients who are unlikely to benefit from biologic therapy alone. Priority should focus on how these patients receive the benefits that many derive from such therapies.

Predictive clinical-genetic model of long-term non-response to tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor therapy in spondyloarthritis.

AIM: Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are effective in controlling disease activity in spondyloarthritis (SpA). However, in a proportion of patients these treatments are ineffective or lead to adverse events. Recently, alternative therapies, such as interleukin (IL)-17 or IL-23 inhibitors, have emerged in the treatment of these pathologies. This study aimed to determine clinical and genetic predictors of non-response to TNFi treatment in 118 spondyloarthritis patients diagnosed according to Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria. METHOD: From the literature, 41 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected that had previously been associated with TNFi treatment response in spondyloarthropathies, rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis. A clinical non-response was defined as a decrease of <50% of initial Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) in axial involvement, or a reduction of less than 1.2 of initial Disease Activity Score of 28 joints-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) in patients with only peripheral involvement. Univariate and multivariate hazard ratios (HR) were determined using Cox proportional hazard models to analyze the potential prognostic factors affecting non-response to TNFi treatment. RESULTS: The clinical factors that significantly increased the non-response rate were: global visual analog scale (VAS), CRP, BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and the number of TNFi used. Only rs11591741 SNP showed an association with non-response. In the multivariate analysis, females had a non-response rate 4.46 times higher than males; each one-point increase in the BASFI index increased the non-response rate by 75%, and being a genotype GG vs GC or CC carrier was associated with an almost 4 times greater non-response rate. CONCLUSION: We developed a clinical-genetic model to identify SpA patients with a long-term non-response to TNFi therapy.