Self-care treatment for lymphoedema of lymphatic filariasis using integrative medicine.

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a neglected tropical disease presenting mainly as lymphoedema (elephantiasis). At present, LF is not effectively treated. Integrative medicine (IM) treatment for lymphoedema uses a combination of Indian traditional medicine, Ayurveda, alongside yoga exercises, compression therapy, antibiotics and antifungal treatments, providing a useful combination where resources are limited and different practices are in use. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of the IM in the existing clinical practice of lower-limb lymphoedema management and to determine whether the treatment outcomes align with the World Health Organization (WHO) global goal of LF management. METHODS: Institutional data from electronic medical records of all 1698 patients with LF between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively analysed using pre- and post-treatment comparisons and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for clinical audit. The primary treatment outcomes evaluated were limb volume, bacterial entry points (BEEPs), episodes of cellulitis, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Secondary outcomes included the influence of the patient's sex, duration of illness, education and employment status on volume reduction. Multiple regression analysis, t-test, χ2-test, analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney U-test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to assess the association between IM and patients' treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Limb volume reduced by 24.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.47-26.61; n = 1660] following an intensive supervised care period (mean 14.84 days, n = 1660). Limb volume further reduced by 1.42% (95% CI 0.76-2.07; n = 1259) at the first follow-up visit (mean 81.45 days), and by 2.3% between the first and second follow-up visits (mean 231.32 days) (95% CI 1.26-3.34; n = 796). BEEPs were reduced upon follow-up; excoriations (78.4%) and intertrigo (26.7%) were reduced at discharge and further improvements was achieved at the follow-up visits. In total, 4% of patients exhibited new BEEPs at the first follow-up [eczema (3.9%), folliculitis (6.5%), excoriations (11.9%) and intertrigo (15.4%); 4 of 7 BEEPs were recorded]. HRQoL, measured using the disease-specific Lymphatic Filariasis Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, showed an average score of 73.9 on admission, which increased by 17.8 at the first follow-up and 18.6 at the second follow-up. No patients developed new cellulitis episodes at the first follow-up, and only five patients (5.3%) developed new episodes of cellulitis at the second follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: IM for lower-limb lymphoedema successfully reduces limb volume and episodes of cellulitis, and also reduces BEEPs, leading to improved HRQoL. IM aligns with the LF treatment goals of the WHO and is a low-cost, predominantly self-care management protocol. IM has the potential to change care models and improve the lives of patients with lymphoedema.

Medical honey for canine nasal intertrigo: A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, adaptive clinical trial to support antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary dermatology.

Intertrigo is a skin fold dermatitis often requiring recurrent treatment with topical antiseptics or antibiotics, which can select antimicrobial resistance. To minimize this risk, we tested the effectiveness of medical-grade Manuka honey at treating intertrigo as compared to a placebo hydrogel. We additionally characterized the culturable microbial flora of intertrigo and recorded any adverse effect with either treatment. During this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, adaptive group-sequential trial, the owners washed the affected sites on their dog with water, dried and applied a thin film of either the honey or the placebo product once daily for 21 days. Cytological and lesional composite scores, owner-assessed pruritus, and microbial cultures were assessed prior to treatment and on Day-22. The fixed effects of time, treatment, and animal-related variables on the pruritus and on each composite score, accounting for random dog effect, were estimated separately with generalized linear mixed models for repeated count outcomes (α = 0.05). The null hypothesis of equal treatment effects was rejected at the first interim analysis. The placebo (n = 16 dogs) outperformed the medical honey (n = 13 dogs) at improving both the cytological score (Treatment×Time = -0.35±0.17; P = 0.04) and clinical score (Treatment×Time = -0.28±0.13; P = 0.04). A microbial burden score higher than 4 increased the severity of the cytological score (dichotomous score: 0.29±0.11; P = 0.01), which in turn increased the severity of the clinical score and pruritus score. For every unit increase in cytological score, the linear predictor of clinical score increased by 0.042±0.019 (P = 0.03), and the one of pruritus score increased by 0.12±0.05 (P = 0.01). However, medical honey outperformed the placebo at alleviating the dog's owner-assessed pruritus after statistically controlling for masking effects (Time = -0.94±0.24; P = 0.002; and Treatment×Time = 0.80±0.36; P = 0.04). Unilateral tests of the least-square mean estimates revealed that honey only significantly improved the pruritus (Hommel-adjusted P = 0.003), while the placebo only improved the cytological and clinical scores (Hommel-adjusted P = 0.01 and 0.002, respectively). Taken together, these results question the value of Manuka honey at treating nasal intertrigo in dogs.

Successful treatment of recalcitrant candidal intertrigo with Dr Michaels® (Fungatinex®) product family.

Candidal intertrigo is an infection of the skin caused by Candida albicans that typically occurs in opposing cutaneous or muco-cutaneous surfaces. Because Candidiasis requires a damaged and moist environment for infection, it typically occurs in areas of friction such as the skin folds of the body. Candidal intertrigo is often difficult to treat and results are often unsatisfactory. In addition, there is a lack of evidence-based literature supporting prevention and treatments for candidal intertrigo. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of Dr Michaels® (also branded as Fungatinex®) products in the treatment of fungal intertrigo, in 20 women and 2 men with a mean age of 72. Five patients (3 female and 2 male) had type 2 diabetes and 16 (14 female and 2 male) were obese. The patients were treated with Dr Michaels® (Fungatinex®) moisturising bar, topical ointment (twice daily application) and oral herbal formulation, PSC 200 two tablets twice daily with food. After 2 weeks of treatment, the lesions had mostly resolved in all patients with only slight erythema evident. After six weeks of treatment using the moisturising bar, topical ointment and oral herbal formulations from the Dr Michaels® (Fungatinex®) product family, the lesions had totally resolved in 18 patients, while 4 patients had to continue the therapeutic protocol for another 2 weeks. Our results demonstrate that the Dr Michaels® (Fungatinex®) complementary product family is efficacious in the treatment of recalcitrant candidal intertrigo. Furthermore, this study highlights that the Dr Michaels® (Fungatinex®) product family is fast-acting and well tolerated with no serious adverse events reported. These data have important implications for resistant cases of candidal intertrigo where traditional therapies have failed.