RESUMEN
The federal Crisis Counseling Program (CCP) funds states' delivery of mental health services after disasters. These services are provided by social workers, other mental health professionals, and paraprofessionals from the local community. The present study examined whether CCP grant recipients that reported more tailoring of their interventions to the needs of diverse community segments achieved greater community penetration. The study reviewed archival records from 36 crisis counseling projects ending between 1996 and 2001. Numbers of clients and client ethnicity were determined through service logs. Tailoring ofservices was determined by content coding of projects' reports. Community demographics were determined from census data. Fifty-six percent of the projects reported using three or more tailoring strategies, suggesting a "precompetence" or greater stage of cultural competence. The proportion of members of racial or ethnic minority groups among program clients closely matched the proportion in grantees' communities. Projects that reported more types of tailored activities reached more clients and served more members ofminority groups. These findings confirm that adapting crisis counseling services to diverse local needs is associated with greater community penetration of mental health services.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría) , Competencia Cultural , Desastres , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/economía , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/economía , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Análisis de Regresión , Servicio Social , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/diagnóstico , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/economía , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/epidemiología , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/economía , Ahorro de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/economía , Estudios Transversales , Alemania , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Socialización , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención del SuicidioRESUMEN
It is generally accepted that modern mental health care gives community treatment priority over partial or full inpatient treatment. The requirements for community treatment of severely ill and chronic psychiatric patients are complex and, together with financing by the different social insurance providers, may lead to a rather problematic fragmentation of health service supply. Schizophrenia is considered the most expensive mental illness in Germany. It is estimated that indirect costs (expressed in financial terms) are five times higher than the direct costs of treatment and care. Innovative concepts of psychosocial intervention show that case management and assertive community treatment reduce the hospitalisation rate and duration of inpatient treatment, enhance social integration, and find the approval of most patients. However, there is no empirical evidence supporting this "psychiatry with no beds". Consideration should be given to psychosocial interventions as an alternative to inpatient hospital treatment such as day hospital care, crisis houses, or acute home treatment.